![]() |
|
|
Vol. 296, Issue 3, 1043-1050, March 2001
Autonomic Neuroscience Institute, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using voltage-clamp procedures on Xenopus oocytes,
agonist-evoked ionic currents by P2X receptors resulting from the
coexpression of P2X2 and P2X3 subunits were
compared against the agonist responses of homomeric P2X2
and P2X3 receptors. With the quantity of P2X3 mRNA kept constant and quantity of P2X2 mRNA progressively
increased, expressed P2X receptors changed from a P2X3-like
receptor to a P2X2-like receptor. In all cases, however,
agonist-evoked responses comprised biphasic (fast and slow)
currents
the former showing the properties of P2X3
receptors and latter consistent with the presence of P2X2
and P2X2/3 receptors. Using desensitization procedures, the
P2X3-like fast current was selectively removed to allow the slow current to be studied in isolation. P2X2/3 receptors
were then characterized by slowly inactivating inward currents that were reproducible within 30 s of washout and whose pharmacological profile [selective agonists, Ap5A >
,
-methylene ATP
,
-methylene ATP > UTP;
antagonists, TNP-ATP
suramin
Reactive blue-2 (RB-2)] contrasted with the profile of P2X2 receptors
(Ap5A,
,
-methylene ATP,
,
-methylene ATP, and
UTP inactive; antagonists, RB-2 > TNP-ATP > suramin). Thus,
our experiments reveal that coexpression of two P2X subunits, which of
themselves can generate functional homomeric receptors, results in a
complex population of heterogeneous P2X receptors
in this case
P2X2, P2X3, and P2X2/3 receptors.
Depending on the relative levels of P2X subunit coexpression, the
operational profile of the resultant P2X receptors can change from one
phenotype to another. This spectrum may explain the variability of
agonist responses in small sensory neurons that also express
P2X2 and P2X3 subunits in different amounts.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
P2X
receptors represent a family of ATP-gated ion channels that play a
significant role in fast excitation and synaptic transmission in many
excitable tissues (Ralevic and Burnstock, 1998
). As far as sensory
neurons are concerned, P2X receptors have been implicated in the direct
excitation of primary afferent nerve fibers (Bland-Ward and Humphrey,
1997
; Cook et al., 1997
; Dowd et al., 1998
; Burgard et al., 1999
;
Hamilton and McMahon, 2000
), in ascending excitation of second order
sensory neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and
dorsomediolateral nuclei of the brainstem (Li and Perl, 1995
; Bardoni
et al., 1997
; Gu and MacDermott, 1997
; Scislo et al., 1997
; Li et al.,
1998
; Tsuda et al., 1999
) and in the excitation of higher order neurons
in the central nervous system (Dreissen et al., 1998
; Ralevic et al.,
1999
).
Thus far, cDNA sequences for seven P2X subunit proteins
(P2X1-7) have been cloned from mammalian tissues.
These P2X subunit proteins can combine to form ion channels, as
homomeric and heteromeric assemblies of three, possibly four, P2X
subunits (Kim et al., 1997
; Nicke et al., 1998
; Torres et al., 1999
).
Transcripts for six subunits (P2X1-6) have been
found in sensory neurons (Chen et al., 1995
; Collo et al., 1996
; Cook
et al., 1997
). However, immunohistochemical studies reveal a
predominance of P2X3-like protein in the cell
bodies of sensory ganglia and associated sensory nerve endings in skin
and lamina II of the spinal cord. P2X3-like immunoreactivity frequently colocalizes with
P2X2-like immunoreactivity in sensory neurons
(Cook et al., 1997
; Vulchanova et al., 1997
; Bradbury et al., 1998
;
Xiang et al., 1998
). Small sensory DRG neurons containing
P2X3-immunopositive material also contain
specific biochemical markers for nociceptor cells (Chen et al., 1995
;
Bradbury et al., 1998
).
It is well known that sensory neurons show a marked variability in the
time course of responses to P2X receptor agonists. Agonist-evoked ion
currents in many rat DRG and trigeminal ganglion neurons are known to
activate and inactivate rapidly, in a manner similar to agonist
responses of homomeric P2X3 receptors (Chen et
al., 1995
; Cook et al., 1997
; Rae et al., 1998
). Such fast agonist
responses are absent in sensory neurons of
P2X3-null (
/
) animals (Cockayne et al.,
2000
). Rat nodose ganglia and bullfrog DRG neurons often respond to P2X
agonists with slowly inactivating ionic currents that are similar to
the responses of heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors
(Bean, 1990
; Khakh et al., 1995
; Lewis et al., 1995
). Furthermore, some
DRG neurons produce composite responses with both rapidly and slowly
decaying ion currents (Burgard et al., 1999
; Grubb and Evans, 1999
).
These differences in the operational profile of native P2X receptors
may be due to different levels of expression of
P2X2, P2X3, and
P2X2/3 receptors in individual sensory neurons
(Burgard et al., 1999
). Here, we have investigated the operational
profiles of the recombinant P2X receptors generated by coexpressing
varying amounts of P2X2 and
P2X3 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. The
resultant spectrum of operational profiles was attributed to a
heterogeneous mixture of homomeric and heteromeric P2X receptors, and
this mixture might conveniently explain the range of operational
profiles of sensory neurons that also express
P2X2 and P2X3 receptor
subunits in varying amounts.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of Oocytes and Expression of Recombinant P2X
Receptors.
Xenopus laevis were anesthetized with
Tricaine (0.2%, w/v) and killed by decapitation. The preparation of
defolliculated Xenopus oocytes has been described previously
(King et al., 1997
). Defolliculated oocytes (stages V and VI) were
injected (40 nl) cytosolically with capped ribonucleic acid (cRNA)
encoding either rat P2X2 or rat
P2X3 receptor subunits. In coexpression
experiments, oocytes were injected with a mixture of cRNAs prepared at
four concentration ratios (1:500, 1:100, 1:50, and 1:20), by mixing
P2X2 cRNA (2, 10, 20, and 50 µg
ml
1) with an equal volume of
P2X3 cRNA (1 mg ml
1).
Injected oocytes were incubated at 18°C in Barth's solution (pH 7.5)
containing (mM): NaCl 110, KCl 1, NaHCO3 2.4, Tris-HCl 7.5, Ca(NO3)2
0.33, CaCl2 0.41, MgSO4
0.82, supplemented with gentamycin sulfate 50 µg
l
1 for 48 h to allow full receptor
expression and then stored at 4°C for up to 12 days.
Solutions and Electrical Recording of cRNA-Injected Oocytes.
Nucleotide-evoked membrane currents were recorded from cRNA-injected
oocytes studied under voltage-clamp conditions using a twin-electrode
amplifier (Axoclamp 2B, Foster City, CA). Intracellular microelectrodes
had a resistance of 1 to 2 M
when filled with 3 M KCl. Oocytes were
perfused constantly (at 5 ml min
1) with
Ringer's solution containing (mM): NaCl 110, KCl 2.5, HEPES 5, BaCl2 1.8, pH 7.4 to 7.5. All recordings were
made at room temperature (18°C) at a holding potential of
50 mV
(unless stated otherwise). Electrophysiological data were recorded on a
chart recorder (Gould 2200S, Ilford, UK).
,
-meATP.
EC50 values for P2X agonists were taken from Hill
plots, where the transform log
(I/Imax
I)
was used (I being the current evoked by each concentration
of agonist). The Hill coefficient was taken from the slope of Hill
plots. Concentration-response curves and inhibition curves were fitted
by nonlinear regression analysis using commercial software (Prism v2.0,
GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Data are presented as mean ± S.E. for
the given number of observations (n). The Student's unpaired t test was used and p values
0.05 were
considered significant.
Compounds and Salts Used.
All common salts were
AnalaR grade (Aldrich Chemicals, Gillingham, UK). Adenosine
5'-triphosphate disodium salt (ATP) was purchased from Boehringer
(Mannheim, Germany). Adenosine-5'-O-(3-trio)triphosphate (ATP
S),
P1,P5-diadenosine
pentaphosphate (Ap5A),
,
-methylene ATP
(
,
-meATP),
,
-methylene ATP (
,
-meATP), uridine
5'-triphosphate (UTP), and Tricaine (3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester)
were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, UK),
pyridoxal-5-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (PPADS) from
RBI-Sigma (Natick, NJ) and 2',3'-O-trinitrophenyl-ATP (TNP-ATP) from Molecular Probes (Cambridge, UK). Suramin was a gift
from Bayer plc (Newbury, UK) and Ip5I a gift from
Dr. Jesus Pintor (University of Complutense, Madrid, Spain). Solutions
of agonists and antagonists were prepared daily from a stock solution (10 or 100 mM, stored frozen) made up in extracellular bathing solution.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three groups of cRNA-injected defolliculated oocytes were tested.
The first and second groups comprised oocytes injected with P2X2 or P2X3 cRNAs,
respectively. The third group of oocytes was injected with a fixed
amount of P2X3 cRNA and varying amounts of
P2X2 cRNA. The first and second groups behaved as
previously observed for homomeric P2X2 and
P2X3 receptors (King, 1998
). The third group of
oocytes showed a spectrum of operational profiles that ranged from
predominantly P2X3-like to predominantly
P2X2-like.
Use of
,
-meATP to Distinguish Types of P2X Receptors.
,
-meATP reliably distinguishes homomeric
P2X2 receptors from homomeric
P2X3 receptors (Fig.
1A).
,
-meATP (100 µM) did not
activate any detectable current at P2X2
receptors, whereas a rapidly activating and rapidly inactivating
current was evoked at P2X3 receptors.
Sham-injected control oocytes did not produce any detectable responses
to
,
-meATP (100 µM).
|
,
-meATP to oocytes coinjected with mixed cRNAs
gave rise to biphasic responses comprising an initial rapidly activating and rapidly inactivating current
(I1) followed by a slowly rising,
slowly inactivating component (I2).
The relative amplitudes of fast (I1)
and slow (I2) currents varied with the concentration ratio of the P2X cRNAs injected (Fig. 1B). As the amount
of P2X2 cRNA was elevated (from a ratio of
1:500-1:20), there was a steady increase in the relative fraction of
the slowly inactivating component (I2)
at the expense of the rapidly inactivating component
(I1), which was progressively
incorporated into, and ultimately obscured by, the slower event.
Some homomeric P2X receptor ion channels possess binary permeability
properties, which can result in biphasic ion currents under certain
conditions (Khakh et al., 1999
,
-meATP-evoked currents appeared to be mediated by two different
sets of P2X receptors, since the former could be selectively
desensitized by repetitive applications of
,
-meATP (40 s apart)
without any significant change in the latter component (Fig. 1C). This
desensitization procedure was used later to study the slow current in
isolation. Homomeric P2X3 receptors also were found to desensitize fully with repeated applications of
,
-meATP (40 s apart) (data not shown).
Potency and Efficacy of
,
-meATP at P2X Receptors.
Concentration/response (C/R) curves for the fast current
(I1) evoked by
,
-meATP were
reliably determined for those oocytes injected with mixed cRNAs ratios
of 1:500 and 1:100 (Fig. 2A). Here,
EC50 values (and Hill coefficients) for agonism
were 1.7 ± 0.3 µM (0.8 ± 0.1; n = 7) and
1.6 ± 0.4 µM (0.8 ± 0.2; n = 5), respectively. For oocytes injected with mixed cRNAs ratios of 1:50 and
1:20, the amplitude of the fast current to
,
-meATP could not be
easily resolved from the slow current
(I2) over the full range of agonist
concentrations used and, accordingly, it was not possible to determine
EC50 values here. In contrast,
,
-meATP yielded an EC50 value of 1.9 ± 0.3 µM
(0.8 ± 0.1; n = 6) at homomeric P2X3 receptors (Fig. 2A).
|
,
-meATP were more easily monitored in oocytes injected with each
of the four ratios of mixed P2X cRNAs. Here, EC50
values (and Hill coefficients) for agonism were: 8.6 ± 1.2 µM
(0.9 ± 0.1; n = 7) at 1:500 ratio; 9.5 ± 1.0 µM (0.8 ± 0.1; n = 6) at 1:100 ratio;
10.2 ± 1.1 µM (1.0 ± 0.1; n = 3) at 1:50
ratio; and 10.3 ± 1.1 (0.8 ± 0.1, n = 3) at
1:20 ratio (Fig. 2B). None of the EC50 values for
slow responses were significantly different for each mixture of cRNAs
used, but were 5-fold higher than corresponding
EC50 values for the fast response. This
difference again supports the notion that two P2X receptors mediated
the fast and slow responses to
,
-meATP
most likely homomeric
P2X3 and heteromeric P2X2/3
receptors, respectively. Under the experimental conditions used,
homomeric P2X3 did not give rise to slow
responses to
,
-meATP, whereas homomeric
P2X2 receptors were not activated by this
synthetic nucleotide (see Fig. 1A).
The above data revealed that EC50 values for
either fast or slow currents to
,
-meATP are unaffected by
altering the mixture of injected P2X cRNAs. However, closer inspection
of the amplitude of fast and slow currents revealed a marked difference
in agonist efficacy. For a test concentration of 3 µM
,
-meATP
(applied at a constant holding potential of
50 mV), the mean
amplitude of the fast current (I1) was
approximately 800 nA when a small amount of P2X2
cRNA was injected into oocytes (1:500 ratio), and was significantly
lower, approximately 250 nA, when more P2X2 cRNA
was injected (1:20 ratio) (Fig. 2C). The converse occurred for the
amplitude of the slow current (I2)
(Fig. 2C). Since the amount of injected P2X3 cRNA
was kept constant in these experiments and only the amount of
P2X2 cRNA was changed, the observed differences in
,
-meATP efficacy appeared to involve a decrease in the number of fast-activating P2X3 ion channels and
concomitant increase in the number of slowly activating
P2X2/3 ion channels, presumably as more
P2X2 subunits competed for
P2X3 subunits to generate heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors.
Slow Currents to ATP and
,
-meATP Involve Different P2X
Receptors.
ATP and other nucleotides were tested on oocytes
coinjected with mixed cRNAs (1:500 ratio), then tested again on
homomeric P2X2 receptors.
EC50 values for these nucleotides at different P2X receptors are given in Table 1. ATP,
2-methylthioATP (2-MeSATP), and ATP
S evoked slow currents at
homomeric P2X2 receptors and produced slow ion
currents in oocytes coexpressing P2X2 and
P2X3 subunits. The potency of ATP and 2-MeSATP,
but not ATP
S, was lower at homomeric P2X2
receptors than at the P2X receptor population formed by
P2X2 and P2X3 subunit
coexpression. Furthermore, four nucleotides (
,
-meATP,
,
-meATP, Ap5A, and UTP) were inactive at
homomeric P2X2 receptors but were agonists at
presumptive P2X2/3 receptors (Table 1).
|
S had an apparent greater efficacy than
,
-meATP at presumptive heteromeric P2X2/3
receptors. In contrast,
,
-meATP, Ap5A, and
UTP showed similar or lower efficacy than
,
-meATP (Fig.
3, A and B). Thus, only those nucleotides
able to stimulate homomeric P2X2 receptors seemed
to have a greater efficacy at heteromeric P2X2/3
receptors. Otherwise, nucleotides that did not activate
P2X2 receptors showed no better efficacy than
,
-meATP at presumptive P2X2/3 receptors.
These findings could be explained if P2X2 and
P2X2/3 receptors were simultaneously generated
when P2X2 and P2X3 subunits
were coexpressed in oocytes, and if both receptor subtypes contributed
toward the slow ion currents evoked by agonists common to each subtype
(i.e., ATP, 2-MeSATP, and ATP
S).
|
,
-meATP were applied successively to generate two slow currents. Saturating concentrations of
,
-meATP (100 µM), applied until the evoked slow response had
completely desensitized, were always followed by a second slow current
when oocytes were challenged with a saturating concentration of ATP
(100 µM) (Fig. 3C). Where ATP was applied first, however, a
successive application of
,
-meATP failed to activate an
additional slow response (Fig. 3C). These results are compatible with
,
-meATP being an agonist of heteromeric
P2X2/3 receptors alone, whereas ATP acts as an
agonist of both homomeric P2X2 and heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors. Thus, the residual slow
response to ATP following desensitization of the slow response to
,
-meATP was mediated by P2X2 receptors
alone, whereas the failure of
,
-meATP to generate an additional
current after ATP was due to the latter activating then inactivating
P2X2/3 receptors.
Antagonism of the Heteromeric P2X2/3 Receptor.
A
way was devised to study P2X2/3 receptors in
isolation, using
,
-meATP to activate P2X2/3
receptors and employing a desensitizing procedure of two agonist pulses
(40 s apart) to inactivate all homomeric P2X3
receptors present (as shown in Fig. 1C). The blocking activity of a
series of P2 receptor antagonists was tested on the residual slow
response evoked by the second pulse of
,
-meATP. Suramin
(0.01-100 µM), RB-2 (0.03-100 µM), PPADS (0.03-100 µM), and
TNP-ATP (0.001-1 µM) caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of
P2X2/3 receptors, whereas
Ip5I (0.01-100 µM) was inactive. IC50 values are given in Table
2. The heteromeric
P2X2/3 receptor was remarkably sensitive to
TNP-ATP (IC50, 11 nM), a feature shared with the
homomeric P2X3 receptor
(IC50, 0.3 nM). Except for suramin, all
antagonists, including TNP-ATP appeared to work in noncompetitive manner, although their blocking actions were slowly reversible after
washout. For suramin, a pA2 value of 5.9 ± 0.4 was determined at the heteromeric P2X2/3
receptor.
|
Modulation of the Heteromeric P2X2/3 Receptor.
The
same procedure of
,
-meATP agonism and twin agonist pulses (40 s
apart) were used again to study P2X2/3 receptors
in isolation and to assess the modulatory effects of extracellular H+ and Zn2+ ions. Under
these circumstances, alteration in the extracellular pH (pH 8.0-6.5)
caused only a modest change in agonist potency at
P2X2/3 receptors (Fig.
4A). These findings contrasted with the
strong effect of pH on agonist potency at P2X2
receptors and weak inhibitory effect of H+ on
agonism of P2X3 receptors (see Table
3).
|
|
,
-meATP (1 µM) caused a modest potentiation
of slow responses (Fig. 4B), with a maximal effect of 89 ± 29%
(n = 4) above control responses. This finding
contrasted with the strong potentiation by Zn2+
ions (100 µM) of ATP responses at P2X2
receptors by some 1320 ± 90% (n = 4) and its
weak inhibitory action against P2X3 receptors in
reducing control responses by 17 ± 2% (n = 6).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was carried out for two reasons. First, we
wished to characterize the pharmacological profile of the
P2X2/3 receptor, about which surprisingly little
is known apart from
,
-meATP agonism (Lewis et al., 1995
) and
TNP-ATP antagonism (Thomas et al., 1998
). Second, we wished to shed
further light on the variability of P2X responses in sensory neurons,
in which P2X2 and P2X3
subunits commonly occur and where P2X2/3
receptors may play a role in sensory transmission.
Sensory neurons show a marked variability in the time course of
responses to P2X receptor agonists. Grubb and Evans (1999)
reported
that the majority (80%) of adult rat DRG neurons responded to
nucleotides with a P2X3-like phenotype, and the
remainder possessed noninactivating P2X receptors of undetermined
phenotype. Burgard and colleagues (1999)
reported similar findings in
adult rat DRG neurons, where 70% of IB4-labeled nociceptors showed
fast-desensitizing P2X3-like agonist responses
and the remaining 30% showed either mixed (fast and slow responses) or
slow responses. To exemplify these phenotypes, we carried out a brief
survey of ATP responses in rat neonatal DRG neurons and found
qualitatively and quantitatively similar results (Fig.
5). In this exploratory survey, 50% of
small DRG neurons produced fast P2X3-like ATP
responses, 30% gave slowly desensitizing responses, and 20% gave
mixed responses. Burgard and colleagues (1999)
have attributed the last
phenotype to mixed P2X receptors resulting from the coexpression of
P2X2 and P2X3 subunits, and
this observation motivated us to study the pharmacological properties
of heteromeric P2X2/3 receptors as fully as
possible.
|
Coexpression of P2X2 and
P2X3 subunits in approximately equal amounts in
HEK 293 cells was reported, in the first study of its kind, to generate
a hybrid P2X2/3 receptor that showed the agonist
profile of P2X3 receptors and inactivation
properties of P2X2 receptors (Lewis et al.,
1995
). However, we have found that the outcome of P2X subunit
coexpression is not straightforward. Where P2X3
expression was kept constant and the level of
P2X2 expression gradually increased, the
resultant P2X receptors changed their phenotype from predominantly
P2X3-like to a mixed phenotype of
P2X2, P2X3 and
P2X2/3 receptors. Thus, coexpression of two P2X
subunits, where each can independently form functional homomeric receptors, seems to generate a heterogeneous population of P2X receptors
in this case P2X2,
P2X3, and P2X2/3 receptors.
This finding suggests that the process of P2X receptor assembly occurs in a stochastic manner, the probability of forming either homomeric or
heteromeric receptors being dependent on the relative numbers of the
two types of P2X subunit available for receptor assembly.
For each of the four levels of
P2X2/P2X3 subunit
coexpression studied, the resultant population of recombinant P2X
receptors gave rise to complex agonist responses. These responses
involved an initial fast current that, we believe, was mediated by a
small population of homomeric P2X3 receptors.
This conclusion was based in part on the finding that
,
-meATP was
equipotent for the P2X3-like fast current and
homomeric P2X3 receptor itself, and
,
-meATP caused prolonged desensitization in both cases. Also, other
P2X3 receptor agonists (e.g.,
Ap5A) evoked fast currents in those oocytes coexpressing P2X2 and P2X3
subunits. Additionally, we have already shown that
Ip5I blocks the P2X3-like
fast current, blocks P2X3 receptors, and also
blocks the fast current of DRG sensory neurons with similar
IC50 values (King et al., 1999
; Dunn et al.,
2000
). Lastly, the amplitude of the P2X3-like
fast current was reduced as more P2X2 subunits
were expressed
a consequence, we believe, of the reduction in the
numbers of P2X3 receptors as their constituent subunits were incorporated instead into P2X2/3 receptors.
The initial P2X3-like fast current was followed
by a slow current that, in all probability, involved
P2X2/3 receptors when
,
-meATP was the
agonist, and both P2X2 and
P2X2/3 receptors when ATP was the agonist.
Significantly, other studies of P2X2 and
P2X3 coexpression have also alluded to the dual
formation of P2X2 and
P2X2/3 receptors (Thomas et al., 1998
; Ueno et
al., 1998
). A slow current to
,
-meATP is a recognized signature
of P2X2/3 receptors (Lewis et al., 1995
; Ueno et
al., 1999
), but surprisingly little else can be said with certainty
about its agonist profile. Agonism of P2X2/3
receptors was reassessed recently (Bianchi et al., 1999
), although
these investigators may not have taken into account the dual formation
of P2X2 and P2X2/3
receptors in their expression system.
The P2X2/3 receptor was further characterized in
our experiments by an agonist potency order of
Ap5A >
,
-meATP >
,
-meATP > UTP, which took into consideration that none of these nucleotides can activate P2X2 receptors. In all probability,
ATP, 2-MeSATP, and ATP
S are agonists at P2X2/3
receptors also, but a true assessment of their potency will require the
discovery of selective P2X2 receptor antagonists
to strip away the complication of coactivating P2X2 and P2X2/3 receptors.
The agonist potency order for homomeric P2X3
receptors was Ap5A >
,
-meATP >
,
-meATP > UTP (setting aside data for ATP, 2-MeSATP, and
ATP
S), which matched the rank order for heteromeric
P2X2/3 receptors, although the
EC50 values for these two P2X subtypes are not
identical (see Table 1).
The antagonist potency order at P2X2/3 receptors
was TNP-ATP > PPADS = suramin > RB-2, with
Ip5I inactive. These antagonists were tested only
on slow currents to
,
-meATP and, therefore, any interaction of
these blocking agents with P2X2 and
P2X3 receptors can be discounted. TNP-ATP was
potent in the near nanomolar concentration range, in agreement with an
earlier study (Thomas et al., 1998
). However, our analysis of the
inhibition curve (nH ~ 1) suggested only a single population of heteromeric P2X2/3
receptors. PPADS, suramin, and RB-2 also blocked the
P2X2/3 receptor in micromolar concentrations,
where the potency order (PPADS = suramin > RB-2) differed
from that for homomeric P2X2 receptors (RB-2 > PPADS > suramin) and P2X3 receptors
(PPADS > suramin > RB-2). Regarding our negative results
with Ip5I, it is of note that slow currents to
,
-meATP in sensory neurons (nodose and DRG) are similarly unaffected by this dinucleotide (Dunn et al., 2000
) and provide indirect proof that such slow responses probably involve native P2X2/3 receptors.
The potentiating effect of extracellular H+ and
Zn2+ was modest at recombinant
P2X2/3 receptors compared with their reported facilitatory actions on P2X2 receptors (Wildman
et al., 1998
). Regarding the effects of H+ ions,
our results revealed a 4-fold increase in agonist potency at
P2X2/3 receptors in changing from pH 8.0 to 6.5, and a 21-fold increase for P2X2 receptors.
Regarding the effects of Zn2+ ions, agonist
activity was enhanced about 2-fold at P2X2/3
receptors, but 14-fold at P2X2 receptors. Both
H+ and Zn2+ ions potentiate
ATP-activated slow currents in nodose ganglia, which express
P2X2 and P2X3 subunits (Li
et al., 1997
). From our present data, it is likely that any
H+- and Zn2+-based
potentiation of ATP-activated responses in sensory ganglia will involve
both P2X2 and P2X2/3 receptors.
In summary, we have carried out a sequential pharmacological survey of
the possible homomeric and heteromeric P2X receptors that could be
generated by coexpression of P2X2 and
P2X3 subunits in the same cell. Our experiments
indicate that, where cell types naturally express more than one P2X
subunit, it is likely that a mixture of homomeric and heteromeric
receptors will be present in these cells. Where the
P2X2/3 receptor was studied in isolation, we
found that the pharmacological profile is comparatively unique and does
not seem to be governed by either of the constituent P2X2 and P2X3 subunits.
Thus,
,
-meATP (but not the structurally related
,
-meATP) is
a potent agonist at P2X2/3 receptors
a profile that does not fit either homomeric P2X2 or
P2X3 receptors. Also, the potency of the
antagonists tested here on P2X2/3 receptors, particularly TNP-ATP, RB-2, and the inactive
Ip5I, did not mirror our findings with homomeric
P2X2 and P2X3 receptors.
These pharmacological findings indicate that the therapeutic value of
P2X subunit-selective agonists and antagonists (a popular objective at
this point in time) might not be entirely appropriate and that
selective agonists and antagonists for those P2X heteromultimers found
in tissues need also be sought.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to Dr. David Julius (University of California at San Francisco, CA) and Dr. John Wood (University College at London, England) for the gift of cDNAs encoding P2X2 and P2X3 subunits.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication November 14, 2000.
Received for publication September 6, 2000.
This work was supported by Roche Bioscience (Palo Alto, CA) and grants from the British Heart Foundation.
Send reprint requests to: Brian F. King. Ph.D., Autonomic Neuroscience Institute, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., Hampstead, London NW3 2PF, UK. E-mail: b.king{at}ucl.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
DRG, dorsal root ganglion;
ATP
S, adenosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate;
Ap5A, P1,P5-diadenosine
pentaphosphate;
cRNA, capped ribonucleic acid;
Ip5I, diinosine pentaphosphate;
,
-meATP,
,
-methylene ATP;
,
-meATP,
,
-methylene ATP;
2-MeSATP, 2-methylthioATP;
RB-2, Reactive blue 2;
PPADS, pyridoxal 5-phosphate
6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid;
TNP-ATP, 2',3'-O-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl)-ATP;
Vh, holding potential;
C/R, concentration/response curve.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Dang, K. Lamb, M. Cohen, K. Bielefeldt, and G. F. Gebhart Cyclophosphamide-Induced Bladder Inflammation Sensitizes and Enhances P2X Receptor Function in Rat Bladder Sensory Neurons J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 49 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D'Arco, R. Giniatullin, M. Simonetti, A. Fabbro, A. Nair, A. Nistri, and E. Fabbretti Neutralization of Nerve Growth Factor Induces Plasticity of ATP-Sensitive P2X3 Receptors of Nociceptive Trigeminal Ganglion Neurons J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8190 - 8201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Burnstock Physiology and Pathophysiology of Purinergic Neurotransmission Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 659 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Greenwood, D. J. Jagger, L.-C. Huang, N. Hoya, P. R. Thorne, S. S. Wildman, B. F. King, K. Pak, A. F. Ryan, and G. D. Housley P2X receptor signaling inhibits BDNF-mediated spiral ganglion neuron development in the neonatal rat cochlea Development, April 1, 2007; 134(7): 1407 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hausmann, J. Rettinger, Z. Gerevich, S. Meis, M. U. Kassack, P. Illes, G. Lambrecht, and G. Schmalzing The Suramin Analog 4,4',4'',4'''-(Carbonylbis(imino-5,1,3-benzenetriylbis (carbonylimino)))tetra-kis-benzenesulfonic Acid (NF110) Potently Blocks P2X3 Receptors: Subtype Selectivity Is Determined by Location of Sulfonic Acid Groups Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 2058 - 2067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. P. Chaves, E. P. Pontelli, and W. A. Varanda P2X receptors in mouse Leydig cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): C1009 - C1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dang, K. Bielfeldt, K. Lamb, and G. F. Gebhart Gastric Ulcers Evoke Hyperexcitability and Enhance P2X Receptor Function in Rat Gastric Sensory Neurons J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3112 - 3119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsuzuki, A. Ase, P. Seguela, T. Nakatsuka, C.-Y. Wang, J.-X. She, and J. G. Gu TNP-ATP-Resistant P2X Ionic Current on the Central Terminals and Somata of Rat Primary Sensory Neurons J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3235 - 3242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|