![]() |
|
|
Vol. 295, Issue 3, 853-861, December 2000
Psychopharmacology Department, Institut de Recherches Servier, Centre de Recherches de Croissy, Croissy/Seine, Paris, France
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although antagonism of mesolimbic dopamine D2
receptors by neuroleptics such as haloperidol attenuates positive
symptoms of schizophrenia, a significant population of "resistant"
patients fails to respond while negative and cognitive symptoms are
little modified. Furthermore, concomitant blockade of striatal
D2 receptors is associated with extrapyramidal motor side
effects. The superior "atypical" antipsychotic profile of clozapine
appears to reside in its broad pattern of interaction with
D2 receptors and a diversity of other monoaminergic sites.
In this regard, serotonergic mechanisms are of particular relevance
both in view of their modulation of dopaminergic transmission and their
key role in the control of mood, cognition, and motor behavior. While
most attention has focused on potential advantages of preferential
5-HT2A versus D2 receptor blockade,
5-HT1A receptors likewise represent a valid target for
improved antipsychotic agents. In this regard, rather than selective
agents, ligands interacting with both 5-HT1A
and D2 receptors appear of interest. A
modest level of efficacy appears optimal, that is, sufficient to engage
highly sensitive 5-HT1A autoreceptors while blocking their
low-sensitivity postsynaptic counterparts. Such a profile may counter
negative and cognitive symptoms, improve mood, diminish extrapyramidal
5-HT1A motor side effects, and, perhaps, enhance efficacy
in refractory patients. Notably, "partial agonist" properties of
clozapine at 5-HT1A receptors may contribute to its
distinctive functional profile. However, notwithstanding this
compelling body of experimental data, clinical studies of
antipsychotics interacting with 5-HT1A receptors are required to establish their genuine pertinence to the
hopefully improved
treatment of schizophrenia.
| |
Schizophrenia, Dopamine Receptors, and Neuroleptics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The highly complex and heterogenous disorder of schizophrenia is characterized by a diversity of symptoms that cannot realistically be ascribed to a unitary, discrete neuroanatomical or neurochemical lesion: positive (delusions, hallucinations, etc.), negative (alogia, flattened affect, social withdrawal), and cognitive-attentional (sensory-gating, working, and verbal memory, etc.). Correspondingly, any one single mechanism of drug action is unlikely to correct this panoply of symptoms in the absence of disruptive side effects.
Conventionally, schizophrenia has been treated with neuroleptics, such
as haloperidol, which interact preferentially with dopaminergic
systems. Reflecting the involvement of hyperactive (or hyper-reactive)
mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways, blockade of limbic
D2 receptors improves positive symptoms (Brunello
et al., 1995
; Kapur et al., 2000
). However, a significant population of
resistant patients remains refractory to treatment, while concomitant antagonism of normosensitive, striatal D2
receptors elicits extrapyramidal motor side effects. Furthermore,
negative and cognitive symptoms are little improved, probably because
they reflect, at least partially, diminished function of mesocortical
dopaminergic projections (Knable and Weinberger, 1997
).
There are several strategies through which novel agents interacting
principally with dopaminergic mechanisms might offer an improved
antipsychotic profile: 1) low affinity, rapidly dissociating and/or
"neutral" D2 receptor antagonists which, in
contrast to potent and slowly dissociating "inverse agonists", such
as haloperidol, may less markedly and durably perturb basal
dopaminergic activity (Seeman and Tallerico, 1999
; Kapur et al., 2000
);
2) partial D2/D3 receptor
agonists permitting dual presynaptic (via autoreceptors) and
postsynaptic attenuation of mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission (Lahti
et al., 1998
); 3) preferential antagonists at D3
versus D2 receptors
no currently employed
antipsychotic agent distinguishes these sites (Brunello et al., 1995
);
and 4) regarding cognitive deficits, selective D4
receptor antagonists or D1 receptor agonists (Friedman et al., 1999
).
Nonetheless, recent years have seen increasing commitment to the
concept that nondopaminergic mechanisms play a crucial role in the
pathogenesis and, potentially, improved treatment of schizophrenia (Brunello et al., 1995
; Roth and Meltzer, 1995
). One major factor underpinning this conviction is the atypical dibenzodiazepine, clozapine.
| |
Clozapine: A Multireceptorial, Monoaminergic, Atypical Antipsychotic |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clozapine is active in many patients that are not responsive to
neuroleptics and exerts antipsychotic activity in the virtual absence
of an extrapyramidal motor syndrome (atypical profile). Furthermore, it
moderates negative and cognitive symptoms in a subpopulation of
patients and, generally, stabilizes mood (Brunello et al., 1995
;
Meltzer et al., 1999
). Clozapine is not, however, an ideal
agent because its use is associated (in a small minority of patients)
with serious hemotoxicity, while its blockade of muscarinic and
histaminergic receptors provokes marked cardiovascular-autonomic side
effects (Cunningham-Owens, 1996
).
The significance of antagonist properties of clozapine at mesolimbic
D2 receptors in the control of positive symptoms
should not be neglected. In fact, at clinically relevant
doses, clozapine may elicit lower (and, perhaps, more transient)
D2 receptor occupation than haloperidol (Seeman
and Tallerico, 1999
; Kapur et al., 2000
), but such observations fail to
provide a satisfactory explanation for the unique clinical profile of
clozapine, which cannot as yet be attributed to a single
receptorial mechanism. Indeed, clozapine interacts with a broad array
of dopaminergic, serotonergic (and adrenergic) receptors, and this
global receptorial profile may account for its distinctive
pattern of clinical activity (Fig. 1)
(Brunello et al., 1995
; Millan et al., 1998a
). Within this multireceptorial framework, the relatively pronounced interaction of
clozapine at specific receptor types relative to its modest antagonist
properties at D2 receptor actions may be the key
to its improved functional profile.
|
In accordance with this concept, while retaining significant
antagonist properties at D2 receptors, the
incorporation of additional components of activity may permit
optimization of beneficial versus deleterious properties. In this
regard, serotonergic mechanisms have attracted particular interest, not
in the least because the fifteen 5-HT types identified to date offer a
broad palette of potential targets for novel, antipsychotic agents
(Roth and Meltzer, 1995
).
| |
Serotonergic Mechanisms in the Treatment of Schizophrenia |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of this plethora of receptors, 5-HT3,
5-HT6, and 5-HT7 subtypes
have all been advocated as involved in the innovative mechanism of
action of clozapine. However, data are limited and the arguments are
not overly compelling (Brunello et al., 1995
; Roth and Meltzer, 1995
).
On the other hand, hallucinogens stimulate 5-HT2A
receptors, and the relatively pronounced antagonist activity at
5-HT2A versus D2 receptors
of clozapine and certain other antipsychotics may improve their
therapeutic window concerning separation of antipsychotic from
extrapyramidal side effects (Roth and Meltzer, 1995
). Moreover, blockade of mesolimbic 5-HT2A receptors by
clozapine underlies its potent antagonism of the effects of
phencyclidine, an agent unique in reproducing both positive
and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in normal subjects
(Millan et al., 1999
). More recently, attention has focused on closely
related 5-HT2C receptors, which antipsychotics generally fail to discriminate from their 5-HT2A
counterparts (Brunello et al., 1995
). Although it has been suggested
that 5-HT2C receptor blockade might compromise
the benefits of 5-HT2A receptor antagonism
(Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
), this contention underplays the prominent
5-HT2C receptor antagonist properties of
clozapine. Moreover, selective blockade of 5-HT2C
receptors reinforces frontocortical dopaminergic transmission,
attenuates the extrapyramidal versus antipsychotic actions of
haloperidol, and exerts anxiolytic properties, observations suggestive
of a favorable influence in psychotic patients (Millan et al., 1998b
,
2000
; Reavill et al., 1999
).
Irrespective of their relative importance, 5-HT2A
and 5-HT2C receptors display functional
interactions with 5-HT1A receptors. For example,
5-HT2A antagonists modify the influence of
5-HT1A agonists upon dopaminergic transmission
(Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
) while 5-HT1A
agonists attenuate 5-HT2A and
5-HT2C receptor-mediated actions of hallucinogens
(Schreiber et al., 1995
). These findings raise the possibility that
5-HT1A receptors may likewise be implicated in
the pathogenesis and treatment of schizophrenia.
| |
5-HT1A Receptors: Neuronal Localization and Organization |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5-HT1A receptors are localized dendritically
as inhibitory autoreceptors on serotonergic cell bodies of the median
raphe nucleus (MRN), which predominantly innervates the dorsal
hippocampus, septum and hypothalamus, and the dorsal raphe nucleus
(DRN), which provides a major input to frontal cortex (FCX), ventral
hippocampus, and striatum (Barnes and Sharp, 1999
). In addition,
postsynaptic 5-HT1A sites are enriched in the
FCX, hippocampus, and other corticolimbic structures implicated in the
etiology of schizophrenia and in the actions of antipsychotic agents.
In line with this organization, both pre- and postsynaptic
5-HT1A receptors fulfill an important role in the
modulation of mood, cognition, and motor behavior (Barnes and Sharp,
1999
), functions perturbed in schizophrenic patients and profoundly
affected by antipsychotic agents.
It is important to underline the greater sensitivity of
5-HT1A autoreceptors compared with their
postsynaptic counterparts (Barnes and Sharp, 1999
). Correspondingly,
certain drugs of intermediate efficacy simultaneously activate and
antagonize dendritic and postsynaptic 5-HT1A
receptors, respectively (Fig. 2). As
exemplified in the ensuing discussion, such partial agonist properties
appear appropriate to the improved control of schizophrenia.
|
Three principal lines of evidence implicate 5-HT1A receptors in the pathogenesis and management of schizophrenia: first, alterations in levels of 5-HT1A receptors in schizophrenia; second, functional actions of selective ligands at 5-HT1A receptors; and third, partial agonist properties of clozapine at 5-HT1A receptors.
| |
Alterations of 5-HT1A Receptor Density in Schizophrenia: Neurodevelopmental Aspects |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies of schizophrenic brain have identified a reproducible
elevation in 5-HT1A receptor density in FCX
(Burnet et al., 1996
, 1997
; Gurevich and Joyce, 1997
). This increase is
independent of the radioligand and is not an effect of medication.
Furthermore, it is specific to schizophrenia because depressed patients
revealed a diminution in 5-HT1A sites in a
positron emission tomography (PET) study (Sargent et al., 2000
), a
technique that could instructively be applied to characterize
5-HT1A receptors in the precocious phase of
schizophrenia. The mechanism underlying the increase in
5-HT1A receptor density remains uncertain but,
because 5-HT2A sites are decreased in
parallel (Roth and Meltzer, 1995
; Burnet et al., 1996
), it is unlikely
to reflect up-regulation due to deficient serotonergic transmission. In
line with this assertion, no consistent alteration in extracellular
levels of 5-HT has been documented in schizophrenics (Roth and Meltzer,
1995
). Furthermore, levels of mRNA encoding
5-HT1A receptors are not modified (Burnet et al.,
1996
), implying that post-transcriptional processes are involved. Challenge studies with the 5-HT1A
agonist, ipsapirone, revealed no marked change in
5-HT1A receptor sensitivity in
schizophrenics
although it is debatable to what extent endocrine
parameters provide insights into the functional state of
cortical 5-HT1A receptors (Roth and Meltzer, 1995
; Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
). The pathophysiological significance of the increase in 5-HT1A receptor
density in schizophrenia, and its relationship to hypofrontality,
remains, thus, to be elucidated. Furthermore, it needs to be
established whether all schizophrenic patients, or only certain
subpopulations, show elevations in frontocortical levels of
5-HT1A receptors.
Interestingly, the alteration in frontocortical
5-HT1A receptors is largely restricted to
superficial laminae and likely includes a subpopulation localized on
glutamatergic cortico-cortical neurones implicated in cognitive
processes and possibly disrupted in schizophrenic patients (Francis et
al., 1993
; Burnet et al., 1996
, 1997
; see below). A comparable increase
in 5-HT1A sites has been detected in orbital and
temporal cortex, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens but would profit
from independent confirmation (Burnet et al., 1996
).
Interestingly, Burnet et al. (1997)
reported an augmentation in the
density of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in raphe nuclei,
although functional correlates remain to be identified.
A final, intriguing finding was an elevation in levels of
5-HT1A receptors in the cerebellar vermis of
schizophrenic patients, a structure implicated in sensory-attentional
processes and motor function (Slater et al., 1998
). This observation,
which resembles the immature state, may reflect a failure to regress in
maturity and be a consequence of neurodevelopmental abnormalities
presaging schizophrenia. On the other hand,
5-HT1A receptors themselves exert a trophic role.
Indeed, in both immature and adult brain, they can modify synaptic
architecture and plasticity via interactions with astrocytes and
neurones, including monoaminergic and cholinergic pathways (Riad et
al., 1994
; Azmitia et al., 1995
). Thus, the possibility that
5-HT1A receptors might be causally involved in the aberrant, neurodevelopmental processes underlying schizophrenia would be interesting to evaluate.
| |
Functional Actions of 5-HT1A Receptor Ligands |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Relevance to Positive Symptoms.
5-HT1A
agonists attenuate induction of DA release in the nucleus
accumbens by the psychostimulant, amphetamine (Ichikawa et al., 1995
;
Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
). However, upon administration alone,
in neurochemical and behavioral studies, no consistent pattern of data
has emerged, with reports that they facilitate, suppress or fail to
modify mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission (see Ichikawa and Meltzer,
1999
; De La Garza and Cunningham, 2000
; Millan et al., 2000
).
Furthermore, although 5-HT1A agonists block discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine in primates (Nader
and Woolverton, 1994
), a complex pattern of effects has been obtained
in rodents, including both attenuation and, albeit rarely, facilitation
of the actions of amphetamine and cocaine (see Herges and Taylor, 1999
;
De La Garza and Cunningham, 2000
).
Relevance to Negative and Cognitive Symptoms.
5-HT1A receptor agonists consistently enhance the
activity of the mesocortical dopaminergic pathway via actions expressed proximally to ventrotegmental dopaminergic cell bodies.
Currently, the prevailing hypothesis is that engagement of
5-HT1A autoreceptors relieves a tonic,
inhibitory influence of 5-HT2C receptors
exerted via excitation of inhibitory GABAergic interneurones in the
ventrotegmental area (Millan et al., 2000
). In addition, GABAergic
interneurones may be directly inhibited by postsynaptic
5-HT1A receptors, but evidence of this mechanism
is weak, and it is probably of secondary importance (Millan et al.,
2000
).
1-adrenoceptors (ARs) and, possibly,
1/2-ARs play an important role in processes
underlying cognition, attention, and mood; indeed, they may be
implicated in cognitive deficits associated with hypofrontality
(Friedman et al., 1999Relevance to Mood.
5-HT1A agonists
express anxiolytic properties (Jann et al., 1990
; Schreiber and De Vry,
1993
) that may predominantly be ascribed to activation of
5-HT1A autoreceptors. Although early studies suggested that postsynaptic 5-HT1A sites likewise
mediate anxiolytic actions, recent work indicates that their
antagonism is associated with anxiolytic properties
(Schreiber and De Vry, 1993
). In view of the exacerbation of comorbid
anxious states both by psychotic symptoms per se as well as by
neuroleptic treatment, auxiliary anxiolytic properties would be
advantageous for an antipsychotic agent. Anti-aggressive properties of
5-HT1A receptor agonists in experimental studies
are likewise attributable to activation of 5-HT1A
autoreceptors (Miczek et al., 1995
). Because hostile behavior is often
encountered in psychotic patients, such properties would also be
beneficial. However, the relationship of serotonergic transmission to
aggressive behavior remains ambiguous and rigorous demonstration of
anti-aggressive actions of selective 5-HT1A
ligands in man is awaited, so such potential advantages require
cautious interpretation (Miczek et al., 1995
).
Relevance to Extrapyramidal Side Effects.
5-HT1A receptor agonists attenuate induction of
catalepsy by D2 receptor antagonists in rodents,
a response predictive of extrapyramidal motor side effects (Wadenberg,
1996
; Wadenberg et al., 1999
). They also inhibit extrapyramidal motor
effects of neuroleptics in primates (Casey, 1993
).
5-HT1A receptors are virtually absent from the
striatum, and these actions primarily reflect engagement of
5-HT1A autoreceptors localized in the MRN, although the DRN may also be implicated (Wadenberg, 1996
; Wadenberg et
al., 1999
). Involvement of the latter would be consistent with projection of DRN-derived serotonergic neurones to the striatum, raising the possibility that subsequent to a reduction of 5-HT release,
postsynaptic mechanisms integrated therein abrogate cataleptogenic effects of striatal D2 receptor blockade.
Modulation of nigrostriatal dopaminergic transmission is unlikely to be
implicated, because 5-HT1A agonists exert a
variable influence upon striatal DA release and fail to
modify its enhancement by haloperidol (Millan et al., 1998a
; Ichikawa
and Meltzer, 1999
, 2000
). Nevertheless, other mechanisms may
potentially be involved: e.g., actions in structures downstream of the
striatum or modulation of corticostriatal glutamatergic afferents
(Francis et al., 1993
).
| |
Actions of Clozapine at 5-HT1A Receptors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In light of the above comments, the demonstration that clozapine
behaves as a partial agonist at human 5-HT1A
receptors is clearly of significance (Assié et al., 1997
;
Newman-Tancredi et al., 1998
), particularly because this action is
expressed with a potency similar to that antagonizing
D2 receptors. Indeed, several lines of
experimental evidence suggest that actions of clozapine at central
5-HT1A sites participate in its functional actions.
First, much has (justifiably) been made of 1) the higher (100-fold)
potency of clozapine at 5-HT2A versus
D2 receptors, and 2) its superior potency at
5-HT2A sites compared with haloperidol, whereas
the opposite holds for D2 receptors (Roth and
Meltzer, 1995
). However, clozapine is clinically used at doses
substantially higher than those of haloperidol and at which
significant D2 receptor occupation is
detected in PET imaging studies (Seeman and Tallerico, 1999
; Kapur et
al., 2000
). If D2 receptors are occupied then so, presumably, are 5-HT1A sites for which it
displays similar affinity. That clozapine genuinely occupies
5-HT1A receptors at therapeutically effective
doses was recently suggested by PET imaging studies in primates (Chuo
et al., 2000
), an approach which should be extended to the clinic.
Second, in experimental studies, many of the above-described actions of
5-HT1A autoreceptor agonists have been observed
with clozapine, which similarly activates and blocks pre- and
postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, respectively
(Millan et al., 1998a
,b
; Newman-Tancredi et al., 1998
). Notably,
frontocortical (versus subcortical) release of DA and NA, enhancement
of social interaction, anxiolytic and anti-aggressive properties, and
attenuation of the cataleptogenic effects of neuroleptics (Corbett et
al., 1993
; Millan et al., 1998b
; Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
). Arguing
by analogy, agonist actions of clozapine at
5-HT1A autoreceptors may contribute to these
effects. Correspondingly, they may contribute to the clinical improvement of negative symptoms and mood in the absence of
extrapyramidal motor side effects. However, the "isolation" of a
5-HT1A receptor-mediated component of action of
clozapine is complicated by its other receptorial interactions. For
example, apart from activation of 5-HT1A
autoreceptors, blockade of DRN-localized
1-ARs
contributes to suppression of serotonergic transmission by clozapine
(Millan et al., 2000
). Furthermore, blockade of postsynaptic
5-HT2C receptors also participates in its
acceleration of DA and NA release in FCX, as well as the expression of
its anxiolytic properties (see Millan et al., 1998b
, 2000
).
The third line of evidence is, nevertheless, derived from interaction
studies with WAY100,635 which neutralizes 5-HT1A
autoreceptor agonist properties of clozapine. Thus, in several but
not all reports, WAY100,635 attenuated the increase in FCX
levels of DA elicited by clozapine, as well as its anxiolytic
properties and its ability to moderate the cataleptogenic actions of
haloperidol (see Millan et al., 1998b
; Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
).
This variable pattern of data reflects the above-mentioned implication
of mechanisms other than 5-HT1A
autoreceptor stimulation in these effects of clozapine.
Clearly, further study is required to underpin the importance of 5-HT1A receptors in the actions of clozapine. In this regard, the potential involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in its influence upon cognitive-attentional function remains to be elucidated.
| |
Other Antipsychotic Agents Interacting with 5-HT1A Receptors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In light of the above, there is considerable interest in the
potential role of 5-HT1A receptors in the actions
of antipsychotics (Roth and Meltzer, 1995
; Ichikawa and Meltzer, 1999
).
Several drugs are illustrated in Fig. 3.
Certain ones justify brief commentary.
|
First, like clozapine, ziprasidone shows equilibrated, but more potent,
partial agonist and antagonist activity at 5-HT1A and D2 sites, respectively, in cellular models.
However, the functional actions of ziprasidone at
5-HT1A receptors in vivo are paradoxically weak
relative to D2 receptor blockade (Perry et al.,
1998
; Sprouse et al., 1999
). Second, S16924 possesses a clozapine-like
multireceptorial profile and shows pronounced partial agonist activity
at 5-HT1A receptors. Stimulation of
5-HT1A autoreceptors plays a key role in its
functional actions in experimental studies: notably, potentiation of
mesocortical DA and NA release, anxiolytic properties, and blockade of
haloperidol-induced catalepsy (Millan et al., 1998a
,b
). Third,
clozapine, ziprasidone, S16924, and other antipsychotics shown in Fig.
3 display marked antagonist activity at
1-ARs, 5-HT2A, and/or 5-HT2C
receptors. On the other hand, the novel benzodioxane derivative,
BTS79018 (Birch et al., 1999
), may be distinguished by modest affinity
for these sites. Experimental and clinical exploration of its
functional profile should, thus, prove instructive in elucidating the
significance of partial agonist properties at
5-HT1A receptors for antipsychotic agents.
One "absentee" from Fig. 3 is the azaspirone and
5-HT1A receptor agonist, buspirone, which
possesses modest affinity at D2 receptors and low
affinity at
1-ARs and
5-HT2 sites. Buspirone, a clinically employed
anxiolytic and antidepressant, was originally evaluated as a potential
antipsychotic agent but yielded disappointing and inconsistent results
in several small trials. In fact, it appeared to improve mood and
reduce extrapyramidal motor symptoms in patients concurrently
administered neuroleptics (Jann et al., 1990
; see Sharma and Shapiro,
1996
). However, the significance of these observations is difficult to
discern because buspirone is rapidly degraded to
1-pyrimidinylpiperazine. This metabolite is virtually devoid of
activity at the 5-HT1A and
D2 receptors, although a potent antagonist at
2-ARs, the blockade of which improves mood and
motor function (see Millan et al., 2000
). In addition, buspirone
displays substantial efficacy at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors (Schreiber and De Vry, 1993
),
whereas, as discussed above, low efficacy at these sites
appears desirable for antipsychotic agents.
| |
Optimal Efficacy and Potency at 5-HT1A Receptors: A Crucial and Complex Question |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As exemplified throughout this review, modest intrinsic activity permitting activation and blockade of pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, respectively, appears to be the most appropriate profile for improved management of schizophrenia.
However, relative functional roles of pre- and postsynaptic
5-HT1A receptors require clarification (Barnes
and Sharp, 1999
). Furthermore, drug efficacy at specific populations of
the 5-HT1A receptor in human brain in vivo
depends critically upon a diversity of unknown variables, such as
G-protein availability, receptor number and sensitivity, pre-exposure
to 5-HT, and constitutive activity. Thus, it is virtually impossible to
predict the precise actions of 5-HT1A receptor
ligands at specific populations of 5-HT1A
receptors in schizophrenia patients. This assertion
is
unfortunately!
particularly valid for partial agonists. As a
corollary of this uncertainty, it is difficult to ascertain the optimal
degree of efficacy at 5-HT1A receptors
required for potential antipsychotic agents. Yet this is a crucial
factor since
at least upon initiation of treament
excessive
activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors may
be deleterious (amnesic and anxiogenic actions, perturbation of sleep,
and a constellation of physiological signs loosely termed the
"syndrome"). On the contrary, a "pure" antagonist, in blocking postsynaptic sites, would exert procognitive properties, yet be deprived of potential advantages of autoreceptor stimulation. Indeed,
5-HT1A autoreceptor blockade may exacerbate
extrapyramidal symptoms provoked by the D2
receptor blockade (Prinssen et al., 1999
).
In addition to efficacy, the relative potency of actions at 5-HT1A receptors versus D2 receptor blockade is an incompletely resolved conundrum. That is, whether equilibrated affinity at 5-HT1A and D2 sites is desirable or, alternatively, a clear preference in favor of the former. This will likely be a function of whether the drug interacts with other sites ("multireceptorial profile") or exclusively recognizes 5-HT1A and D2 receptors.
| |
Clinical Evaluation of Antipsychotics Interacting with 5-HT1A Receptors: Key Issues |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In concluding, it is appropriate to specify certain important considerations in the clinical evaluation of antipsychotic agents possessing marked activity at 5-HT1A receptors.
First, a crucial issue is the demonstration that, at doses
exploited for efficacy studies, there is significant occupation of
central 5-HT1A receptors. PET studies have proven
indispensable for characterization of drug actions at
5-HT2A versus D2 receptors and, with the availability of [11C]WAY100,635,
this strategy may likewise be adopted for 5-HT1A receptors. This approach permits, further, observations of the relative
occupancy of pre- versus postsynaptic receptors, which may
not necessarily be identical. Although PET imaging yields no
information on drug efficacy, measures of core temperature, corticosterone, and growth hormone secretion may be of use (Roth and
Meltzer, 1995
). Drug influence upon such parameters can be extrapolated from experimental studies, although the relative contribution of pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1A
receptors to their modulation remains uncertain. Whether
5-HT1A receptor ligands generate an idiosyncratic
electroencephalographic signature remains unclear, but their influence
upon sleep patterns is well characterized, so such information would be
important to acquire.
A second fundamental issue concerns patient selection and clinical assessment. It is improbable that actions at 5-HT1A receptors per se control positive symptoms in neuroleptic-responsive patients, although any potential improvement in resistant subjects patients justifies examination. Otherwise, therapeutic benefits are more likely to be encountered for deficit and cognitive symptoms. Their quantification should be a principal focus of studies adopting appropriate rating scales and, if feasible, models of cognitive-attentional function.
Third, activation of 5-HT1A autoreceptors is, in general terms, "activating" rather than sedative and/or motor-suppressant, so the introduction of antipsychotics possessing such actions in patients accustomed to neuroleptics (and tranquilizing agents) should be undertaken cautiously, in particular, if concurrent D2 receptor blockade cannot be guaranteed. In this light, for an optimal appreciation of the potential benefits and disadvantages of agents interacting with 5-HT1A receptors, if possible, it would be advisable to avoid recent or simultaneous utilization of other classes of psychotropic agent.
Finally, because 5-HT1A receptors modulate
sympathetic outflow, the potential modification of cardiovascular
parameters, particularly in association with
1-AR and 5-HT2 receptor
blockade, requires careful surveillance.
Such potential complications are arguably inherent to any drug class possessing a novel mechanism of action. Furthermore, these issues are most relevant at the onset of treatment and do not appear unsurmountable within the framework of prudent and appropriately designed, long-term clinical trials.
| |
Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conclusion, selective 5-HT1A receptor ligands are unlikely to be of use in the treatment of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, antipsychotics possessing partial agonist properties at 5-HT1A receptors (allowing stimulation and antagonism of pre- and postsynaptic populations, respectively) may offer advantages. In this respect, both dual 5-HT1A/D2 receptor and multireceptorial ligands are of interest. Additional study is necessary to define the precise degree of potency and efficacy at 5-HT1A receptors requisite for optimization of clinical benefit. Antipsychotics interacting with 5-HT1A receptors are unlikely to provide a panacea for the problem-free treatment of all schizophrenic patients, and well designed, thorough, and imaginative clinical trials are required to more precisely characterize the potential use of this mechanism of action in the management of psychotic disorders.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
I thank Gilbert Lavielle, Alain Gobert, and Adrian Newman-Tancredi for helpful comments concerning the manuscript, Marianne Soubeyran for secretarial assistance, and Solange Huet for the preparation of Fig. 3.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication August 3, 2000.
Received for publication July 6, 2000.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Mark J. Millan, Institut de Recherches Servier, Centre de Recherches de Croissy, Psychopharmacology Department, 125, chemin de Ronde, 78290 Croissy/Seine, France. E-mail: mark.millan{at}fr.netgrs.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
5-HT, serotonin;
AR, adrenoceptor;
DA, dopamine;
DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus;
FCX, frontal cortex;
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
MRN, median raphe nucleus;
NA, noradrenaline;
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate;
PET, positron emission tomography.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (preclamol) in schizophrenia.
Biol Psychiatry
43:
2-11[Medline].