![]() |
|
|
Vol. 295, Issue 1, 51-57, October 2000
Chemistry (M.R.G., D.M., S.L.D.) and Medical (M.F., N.D.V., A.G., S.J.G., P.E.M.) Departments, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York; and Psychiatry Department, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York (S.L.D.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The therapeutic and stimulant properties of methylphenidate (MP), a drug commonly prescribed for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, have been attributed to increases in synaptic dopamine (DA) concentrations resulting from the blockade of DA transporters. In addition to obvious difficulties inherent in any interspecies comparison, interpretation of preclinical studies done with MP is further complicated by different routes of administration in animals (i.v. and i.p.) compared with humans (oral). In the present study we compared the effects of i.p. and intragastric (oral) MP both on rat nucleus accumbens DA assessed by in vivo microdialysis and on locomotor activity measured in a photocell apparatus. We also compared regional brain uptake and plasma levels of [3H]MP after administration of 5 mg/kg via both routes. Intraperitoneal MP (5 and 10 mg/kg) was approximately twice as potent as intragastric MP in terms of increasing extracellular DA levels and in stimulating locomotion. This was consistent with the higher brain uptake of [3H]MP when given i.p. rather than intragastrically. The dose of 2 mg/kg produced significant increases in both measurements when administered i.p., but not intragastrically. This study shows that relatively low doses of MP (2 mg i.p. and 5 mg intragastric) significantly increase extracellular DA and locomotor activity and indicates that the differences in the neurochemical and behavioral effects of MP between the intragastric and the i.p. routes are due to central drug bioavailability.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Over
the past decade increased recognition of attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (Swanson et al., 1998
) has led to a dramatic increase in the use of methylphenidate (Ritalin, MP), a
psychostimulant commonly prescribed to treat this disorder. Despite
this widespread use, the mechanisms by which MP exerts its therapeutic
effects remain poorly understood. Although a considerable number of
preclinical studies have been completed, their interpretation is
limited by the fact that i.p. and i.v. routes have been used, whereas
the oral route is used clinically. Moreover, most studies have used
doses significantly higher (2-15 mg/kg i.v. or 10-50 mg/kg i.p.) than
those used clinically in humans (0.3-1 mg/kg; Sprague and Sleator,
1977
). Studies with doses that are therapeutically relevant (0.6-10
mg/kg i.p. or s.c.) have predominantly investigated sensitization and
tolerance to motor-activating and stereotypic effects of MP (McNamara
et al., 1993
; Gaytan et al., 1997
; McDougall et al., 1999
). Higher
doses of MP lead to a greater incidence of side effects, including
sleep disturbances and irritability in children (Cole, 1975
). To our
knowledge, the only two studies that have investigated the effects of
oral MP in rodents focused on its pharmacokinetic profile in brain and
plasma, and not on the concomitant behavioral or neurochemical effects
of the drug (Wargin et al., 1983
; Patrick et al., 1987
).
The therapeutic effects of MP as well as its psychostimulant properties
are thought to be related to its ability to increase extracellular
dopamine (DA) in the mesocorticolimbic system (Castellanos et al.,
1996
), secondary to blockade of DA transporters (Ritz et al., 1987
).
Similarly, the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine-like drugs
also are associated with their ability to block the DA transporter.
This has led to serious concerns regarding the potential reinforcing or
addictive properties of MP. However, despite the pharmacological
similarities between MP and cocaine, including similar potency at the
DA transporter (Volkow et al., 1995
; Gatley et al., 1999
), its abuse is
much less frequent (NIDA-CEWG, 1995
) and is mainly restricted to
the i.v. or intranasal route of administration with very infrequent
oral abuse (Parran and Jasinski, 1991
). The rare occurrence of oral
abuse is probably related to the slow rate of DA transporter blockade
achieved by oral MP because the reinforcing effects of psychostimulant
drugs are thought to be related, at least in part, to a rapid rate of binding to DA transporters (Stathis et al., 1995
) and subsequently, a
rapid increase in synaptic DA (Balster and Schuster, 1973
). Thus,
although i.v. MP produces a "high", which cocaine abusers report to
be similar to that induced by i.v. cocaine (Wang et al., 1997
), oral MP
with a slower onset of transporter blockade does not produce a
high in normal subjects (Volkow et al., 1998
).
Dose-related effects of MP were clearly demonstrated by Porrino and
coworkers. They showed that local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU)
in the rat nucleus accumbens (NACC), a brain region associated with the
reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse (Di Chiara, 1999
), was stimulated
by a low dose of MP (1.25 mg/kg i.v.), but not by a high dose (15 mg/kg). However, higher doses dramatically increased LCGU in the
extrapyramidal system (Porrino and Lucignani, 1987
). A similar
dose-related pattern was observed with amphetamine (Porrino et al.,
1984
). These authors later demonstrated that behaviorally equivalent
doses of i.v., but not i.p. cocaine, produced increases in LCGU in NACC
(Porrino, 1993
). This similarity in the distribution of changes in LCGU
led the authors to propose a significant role of the NACC in the
therapeutic response of hyperactive children to psychostimulant
medications. Taken together, these data suggest the importance of
determining the dose-response function for different routes of
administration in evaluating the biochemical and behavioral effects of psychostimulants.
The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of oral MP (intragastric administration) on extracellular DA in NACC and on locomotor activity. In addition, we directly compared the effects of oral versus i.p. MP to provide a context for evaluation of the findings from previous studies. The range of doses used (2-10 mg/kg) is, in general, lower than those investigated previously. Finally, we compared two methods of oral MP administration, a surgically implanted intragastric catheter versus gavage, to determine whether the stress associated with gavage would influence the effects of MP on NACC DA.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in all experiments (200-300 g; Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) and were given food and water ad libitum. Temperature and humidity were kept constant. Each animal was housed individually on a 12/12-h light/dark cycle. All animals were used under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol and with strict adherence to National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Drug Treatment. MP hydrochloride (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg) (a racemic mixture of d-threo- and l-threo-MP; Research Biochemicals International, Natick, MA) was dissolved in saline and injected i.p. Intragastric administration (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg) was accomplished through the preimplanted catheter followed by a rinse with vehicle. Control animals received saline via both routes. These same methods were used with microdialysis and locomotor activity studies. In a separate microdialysis experiment MP (5 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered via a gavage needle that was gently passed down the esophagus to the stomach (n = 6-8 for each treatment group). All microdialysis and activity measures were obtained between 12:00 PM and 3:00 PM.
Microdialysis Studies.
Microdialysis studies were completed
as detailed previously (Gerasimov and Dewey, 1999
). Animals were
anesthetized with an i.m. injection of ketamine/xylazine mixture and
siliconized guide cannulas were stereotaxically implanted into the
right NACC (2.0 mm anterior and 1.0 mm lateral to bregma, and 7.0 mm
ventral to the cortical surface). On completion of the brain surgery a
polyethylene catheter was placed in the stomach of animals intended for
intragastric studies by using aseptic surgical techniques. The catheter
was exteriorized after anchoring with a suture in the back of the neck.
Animals were allowed to recover for at least 4 days.
Locomotor Activity. Animals were individually placed in photocell activity boxes (San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA). The boxes were 41.3 × 41.3 × 30.5-cm clear acrylic. The electronic system used to monitor the movements consists of 16 infrared beams projecting across the cages from left to right and 16 beams from back to back. All the beams are approximately 0.39 cm from the floor. After 100 min to allow initial exploratory behavior to decrease, animals were injected i.p. with vehicle or MP (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg). In a separate group of experiments, animals received saline or MP (2, 5, or 10 mg/kg) by intragastric infusion via a catheter. Beam crossings were recorded every minute and the mean number of crossings for each group of animals was summed into 20-min intervals for graphical display.
d-[3H]threo-MP Uptake in the Brain. Animals were treated with 5 mg/kg MP plus 2 µCi (per rat) of d-[3H]threo-MP either i.p. or via gavage. After 20 min animals were sacrificed by decapitation and their striata and cerebella dissected. Brain regions were weighed and dissolved in 1 ml of tissue solubilizer (Solvable; Packard, Meriden, CT). UltimaGold (Packard) liquid scintillation fluid was added and radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting with quench connection by external standard. Data are expressed as nanomoles of d-[3H]threo-MP per gram of tissue (wet weight).
Data Analysis. Peak increases in extracellular DA, expressed as a percentage of baseline values (the average of three predrug levels differing from each other by not more than 10%) were compared for every dose across both routes of administration by a one-way ANOVA and post hoc test. Significance levels were set at P < .05.
For comparison purposes, the increases in NACC DA levels were normalized to the highest value for each dose and expressed as a percentage of that value. Locomotor activity reflects the highest beam crossing count after subtraction of the baseline activity.| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microdialysis Studies.
Intraperitoneal injections of MP dose
dependently increased extracellular NACC DA above vehicle treatment
values (F = 26.75; P < .05, P < .01, P < .001 for 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, respectively). Intragastric administration also produced an
increase in DA levels (P < .05 and P < .001 for 5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively). However, the measured
response after intragastric administration of 2 mg/kg did not reach
statistical significance. For both routes of administration and all
three doses, the maximal effect of MP occurred at 40 min with levels
returning to baseline values approximately 2.5 h
postadministration (Fig. 1). During the
first 20 min after administration the values approximately doubled for
i.p. injection, but increased only by 30% after intragastric
administration (Fig. 1, B and C), consistent with a faster rate of DA
increase after the i.p. route.
|
|
Locomotor Activity.
Similar to our microdialysis data, i.p.
injections of MP dose dependently increased gross locomotor activity
above vehicle treatment values (Fig. 3)
(F = 36.68; P < .05, P < .01, P < .001 for 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, respectively.
Intragastric administration, however, resulted in increased locomotion
only after 5- and 10-mg/kg doses (P < .01, P < .001). On average, the maximal response for i.p.
administration occurred at 20 min, whereas for intragastric administration it occurred at 40 min postdrug administration. For each dose examined, the DAergic and locomotor response to i.p. MP was significantly greater than the response after intragastric administration (Figs. 4 and
5).
|
|
|
|
Brain and Plasma Levels of MP.
Intraperitoneal administration
of [3H]MP resulted in higher levels of
radioactivity in plasma and brain than the intragastric route (Table
1).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study shows that intragastric and i.p. routes of
administration differ significantly with respect to the absolute
magnitude and the time course of increases in extracellular DA and
locomotor response. Intraperitoneal MP was approximately twice as
potent as oral MP both in increasing extracellular DA levels at the
doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg (Fig. 1A) and in stimulating locomotor activity at these same doses (Fig. 1B). This is consistent with the apparent higher uptake of [3H]MP measured in the brain
after i.p. versus intragastric administration (Table 1). However, the
interpretation of the brain uptake results is limited by the inaccuracy
of assessing the total radioactivity counts without isolating
[3H]MP from
3H-metabolites. Interestingly, at the lowest dose
of 2 mg/kg given intragastrically, we did not observe an increase in DA
levels above vehicle treatment nor was there any change in locomotor activity. In contrast, that same dose administered i.p. produced a
significant increase above baseline values in extracellular DA and in
locomotion. These data are in agreement with the notion that
quantitatively different responses to identical doses of MP
administered to humans via two systemic routes (i.v. and oral) are a
function of bioavailability (Chan et al., 1980
). The lower bioavailability for intragastric versus i.p. MP is presumably due to
the slower absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and a greater
degree of metabolism to ritalinic acid, a compound with negligible
psychostimulant properties (Faraj et al., 1974
).
Overall, quantitative and qualitative differences between oral, i.p.,
and i.v. routes of administration have been demonstrated for MP across
species (Faraj et al., 1974
; Wargin et al., 1983
). However, the reports
are varied and sometimes inconsistent. This may reflect considerable
intersubject variability due to differences in drug absorption and
metabolism. Studies by Faraj et al. (1974)
, Wargin et al. (1983)
, and
Chan et al. (1980)
provide evidence for presystemic metabolism of MP
via deesterification in the gut and microsomal hydroxylation in liver
as well as high intrinsic clearance due to plasma and/or tissue
esterase activity. Reported estimates of the absolute systemic
bioavailability of oral MP in children, rats, and monkeys vary between
10 and 50%.
Gross locomotor activity observed at 10 mg/kg i.p. does not seem to
increase further with a higher dose of 20 mg/kg (O. Rice and S. J. Gatley, unpublished observations) even though extracellular NACC
DA levels are increased further (860 versus 480% of baseline) (Rice et
al., 1998
). This is presumably due to focused stereotypies interfering
with horizontal movements of the animal (Gaytan et al., 1996
).
For both routes of administration gross locomotor activity responses to
MP approximately track increases in NACC DA. This is consistent with
the hypothesis that facilitation of DAergic transmission is involved in
the locomotor response to psychostimulants (Beninger, 1983
). The
intragastric route exhibited a very close parallelism for the
behavioral and neurochemical responses to MP, even though these
measurements were obtained in different groups of animals. Normalized
plots of extracellular DA and locomotor activity are almost identical
(Fig. 6, A and B). However, for i.p. administration the quantitative
features of MP-induced behavioral activation were dissociated from
increases in extracellular DA. Peak hyperactivity occurred at 20 min
postadministration, whereas the DA response took 40 min to reach its
maximum. Between 20 and 40 min locomotor activity was almost constant,
whereas extracellular DA continued to increase. Although this could
reflect a ceiling effect for locomotor activity, after which further DA
increases result in stereotypies, it also could reflect acute tolerance to the locomotor-activating effects of synaptic DA, occurring after the
fast initial increase in DA concentrations. A similar dissociation
between plasma levels and therapeutic efficacy has been reported for
oral MP in children (Swanson et al., 1999
). The time course of plasma
and brain MP concentration changes appears to be crucial in determining
the efficacy of this drug (Srinivas et al., 1992
). This notion was
recently emphasized by Swanson et al. (1999)
who demonstrated that the
efficacy of a given total dose of MP is affected by its rate of administration.
A dissociation between DA and locomotor activity for the i.p. route of administration also was observed for the declining portion of the curves for the 10-mg/kg dose because at 120 min postinjection DA levels were already returning to baseline, whereas locomotion remained significantly elevated. This also could have reflected a ceiling effect and we cannot rule out the possibility that as DA levels fell stereotypy decreased concomitantly. New studies are now being designed with the goal of assessing the temporal course of stereotypies. Alternatively, this dissociation could reflect lingering downstream effects.
Another explanation is based on the partial involvement of the
noradrenergic neurotransmitter system in the locomotor response to
stimulants (Svensson and Ahlenius, 1983
). We previously demonstrated that MP binds to norepinephrine transporters and is an effective in
vitro inhibitor of norepinephrine uptake (Gatley et al., 1996
). Kuczenski and Segal (1997)
demonstrated that the temporal profile of
the hippocampal norepinephrine response to i.p. MP in rats is
significantly different from that of DA, with a slower onset and longer duration.
For the highest MP dose tested (10 mg/kg) the difference in locomotor activity between the two routes is better demonstrated by comparing the areas under the curve (total movements count over the sampling period) rather than the peak effects (Figs. 3 and 5) because the magnitudes of peak activity were similar, but i.p. MP had a much longer-lasting effect. This is likely to reflect almost complete DA transporter saturation at this dose for both routes, but the higher bioavailability achieved with the i.p. route may result in a longer duration of DA transporter blockade at this high level of occupancy.
In extrapolating the results of this study to the effects of clinical
doses of MP the question of a proper dose for comparison arises.
Matching of the peak MP plasma concentrations in humans and in rats
does not seem to be appropriate for choosing a clinically relevant dose
to be administered to animals. Concentrations that are considered
therapeutic (8-10 ng/ml) (Swanson and Volkow, 2000
) are reached at an
average of 1 to 1.5 h after administration and roughly coincide
with the peak changes in behavioral and somatic variables. The average
half-life of oral MP is reported to be 2 to 3 h (Wargin et al.,
1983
; Volkow et al., 1998
). However, similar plasma levels in the rat
are only achieved for a short period of time (1.4-25 ng/ml at 15 min)
and are almost undetectable at 30 min (0-4 mg/ml) (T. Cooper, personal
communication). According to Patrick et al. (1984)
, oral administration
of 1 mg/kg MP in rats results in peak serum concentrations of 40 ng/ml
that are reached 10 min after dosing, but which fall to 15 ng/ml during the next 5 min. However, when 10 mg/kg oral MP is administered to rats,
the half-life of MP appears to be 1 h with the plasma levels of 40 ng/ml occurring 3 h after drug administration (Wargin et al.,
1983
) or 10 to 20 ng/ml 4 h after 20 mg/kg (T. Cooper, personal
communication). Based on these data one might argue that the lowest
dose of oral MP (2 mg) used in the present study is not of clinical
relevance due to its short-lived effective concentrations in plasma and
subsequently, brain concentrations. However, the intragastric dose of
10 mg/kg leads to sustained plasma levels that are higher than those
achieved therapeutically. The intermediate MP dose of 5 mg/kg
administered intragastrically might mimic the therapeutic doses better.
In terms of the magnitude of neurochemical and behavioral effects, the
5-mg/kg intragastric dose was roughly equivalent to the 2-mg/kg i.p.
dose. Thus, by extrapolation one could suggest that i.p. MP doses of
less than 5 mg/kg may be closer to those used clinically. However, one
should keep in mind that therapeutic effect of MP in humans requires
sustained brain levels, which are not achieved in rats.
In this study we did not observe a difference between the DAergic responses to MP administered intragastrically or via gavage. This indicates that both methods are adequate for testing the effects of oral MP.
Investigation of the relative effects of oral and i.p. MP is of basic
and clinical significance. Low reinforcing effects of oral versus i.v.
MP in humans have been linked to differences in pharmacokinetics rather
than poor binding efficacy at the DA transporter (Volkow et al., 1998
).
Additionally, several studies have shown that the effects of MP are
dependent on the behavioral state of the subject. This effect described
as "rate dependence" has been documented both in rats and in humans
(Rapport et al., 1984
; Weber, 1985
). Our results demonstrate that the
route of administration is an important determinant of the behavioral
and neurochemical consequences associated with MP administration in rodents. Additionally, we are currently conducting new studies investigating the changes in brain DA elicited by therapeutic doses of
MP in humans.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Wynne Schiffer and David Alexoff for helpful discussions. The d-[3H]threo-MP was the kind gift of Dr. Michael Kilbourne.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 20, 2000.
Received for publication April 10, 2000.
1 This research was carried out at Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research (USDOE/OBER DE-AC02-98CH10886), and by the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH MH49165 and NIMH R2955155) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5RO-DA06278 and DA09490).
2 Current address: Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA 70112.
Send reprint requests to: Madina R. Gerasimov, Chemistry Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000. E-mail: madina{at}bnl.gov
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
MP, methylphenidate; DA, dopamine; LCGU, local cerebral glucose utilization; NACC, nucleus accumbens.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Cassaday, B. Finger, and R. Horsley Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Gray, M. Punsoni, N. E. Tabori, J. T. Melton, V. Fanslow, M. J. Ward, B. Zupan, D. Menzer, J. Rice, C. T. Drake, et al. Methylphenidate Administration to Juvenile Rats Alters Brain Areas Involved in Cognition, Motivated Behaviors, Appetite, and Stress J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7196 - 7207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Drouin, M. Page, and B. Waterhouse Methylphenidate Enhances Noradrenergic Transmission and Suppresses Mid- and Long-Latency Sensory Responses in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex of Awake Rats J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 622 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Patel, D. J. Rademacher, and C. J. Hillard Differential Regulation of the Endocannabinoids Anandamide and 2-Arachidonylglycerol within the Limbic Forebrain by Dopamine Receptor Activity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Wilens, S. V. Faraone, J. Biederman, and S. Gunawardene Does Stimulant Therapy of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Beget Later Substance Abuse? A Meta-analytic Review of the Literature Pediatrics, January 1, 2003; 111(1): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuczenski and D. S. Segal Exposure of Adolescent Rats to Oral Methylphenidate: Preferential Effects on Extracellular Norepinephrine and Absence of Sensitization and Cross-Sensitization to Methamphetamine J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7264 - 7271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Volkow, G.-J. Wang, J. S. Fowler, J. Logan, M. Gerasimov, L. Maynard, Y.-S. Ding, S. J. Gatley, A. Gifford, and D. Franceschi Therapeutic Doses of Oral Methylphenidate Significantly Increase Extracellular Dopamine in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., January 15, 2001; 21(2): RC121 - RC121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||