![]() |
|
|
Vol. 293, Issue 3, 771-778, June 2000
R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, San Diego, California
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent cloning and characterization of the human histamine H3 receptor cDNA marked a significant step toward a greater understanding of the role of this receptor in the central nervous system. We now report the cloning of the rat histamine H3 receptor cDNA and demonstrate distinct pharmacological species differences. The rat cDNA clone encodes a putative 445-amino acid protein with 93% identity to the human H3 receptor. Northern blot analysis revealed a major single entity of 2.7-kb in length expressed only in brain. Transfection of the rat receptor cDNA into SK-N-MC cells conferred an ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation in response to histamine and other H3 agonists. N-[3H]methylhistamine saturably bound to transfected cells with high affinity (Kd = 0.8 nM). All agonists tested had low or subnanomolar Ki values similar to that for the human recombinant receptor. The antagonists thioperamide and clobenpropit also bound with high affinity (Ki = 4 and 0.4 nM, respectively). This is in contrast to the antagonist profile obtained for the human recombinant receptor that showed Ki values of 58 and 0.6 nM for thioperamide and clobenpropit, respectively. These data suggest that the low affinity of thioperamide for the human H3 receptor represents a species difference in pharmacology and not a unique pharmacological subtype. It also was found that chloroproxyfan behaved as a full agonist at the rat recombinant receptor. These findings highlight the significance of validating the pharmacology of experimental compounds at both the rat and human H3 receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
histamine H3 receptor was first identified as a
presynaptic autoreceptor on histamine neurons in the brain controlling the stimulated release of histamine (Arrang et al., 1983
). It has
subsequently been shown to be a presynaptic heteroreceptor in
nonhistamine-containing neurons in both the central and peripheral nervous systems (for review, see Hill et al., 1997
). We recently reported the cloning and functional characterization of the human H3 receptor cDNA (Lovenberg et al., 1999
) and
showed that the recombinant H3 receptor is a
G-protein-coupled receptor that signals through the inhibition of
adenylate cyclase. Pharmacological comparison between binding potencies
of known ligands for the cloned human receptor and previously published
rodent data were mostly consistent. However, there were some
discrepancies such as the apparent low affinity of the prototypical
H3 antagonist thioperamide for the human clone
(60 nM), whereas the H3 antagonist clobenpropit
exhibited high affinity (1 nM). Thioperamide had been reported by many
investigators to bind with high affinity to rodent
H3 receptors from various species and tissues
(2-5 nM). West et al. (1990)
also have reported that in rodent tissue,
thioperamide binds to both high (H3a; 5 nM)- and low (H3b; 68 nM)-affinity sites, thus possibly distinguishing between two distinct
populations of receptor (West et al., 1990
). To determine whether the
human clone that we found represented the putative H3b subtype, we
cloned and characterized its rat homolog and determined the
pharmacological properties.
| |
Experimental Procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. cDNA synthesis kits were purchased from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Gelzyme was from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA) and pCIneo vector was from Promega (Madison, WI). SK-N-MC cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). cAMP flashplates were from NEN (Boston, MA). G-418 was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). All histamine ligands were purchased from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Cloning of Rat Histamine H3 Receptor cDNA.
To
screen for cDNAs encoding the rat ortholog of the human H3 receptor, a
cDNA library derived from rat hypothalamus (Life Technologies) was
constructed. Briefly, 5 µg of poly(A)-selected RNA was synthesized
into double-stranded cDNA, followed by size selection via a 0.8%
low-melting agarose gel. The cDNA in the range of 2.5 to 5 kb was
subsequently ligated (pSport) and transformed into Escherichia
coli. The subsequent cDNA library was screened with a 600-base
pair 32P-radiolabeled cDNA fragment (1.5 × 106 counts/ml). The fragment was derived by
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers (identical with the human
H3 cDNA sequence) to amplify a fragment from rat
hypothalamus cDNA. Library filters were hybridized overnight (buffer
from 5'
3', Boulder, CO) and then washed twice at room temperature
in 2× standard saline citrate (SSC)/0.2% SDS for 30 min followed
by two washes at 50°C in 0.2× SSC for 30 min. Filters were
exposed to film (24 h) and developed. Positive clones were
subsequently sequenced (ABI 377; Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). The
full-length rat H3 receptor cDNA was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pCIneo (Promega) for recombinant expression.
Transfection of Cells with Rat H3 Receptor.
SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells were grown to ~70 to 80% confluence and
removed from the plate with trypsin and pelleted in a clinical
centrifuge. The pellets were resuspended in 400 µl of complete medium
and transferred to an electroporation cuvette with a 0.4-cm gap between
the electrodes (Bio-Rad 165-2088). One microgram of supercoiled DNA was
added to the cells and mixed. The voltage for the electroporation was
set at 0.25 kV, and the capacitance was set at 960 µF. After
electroporation, the cells were diluted into 10 ml of complete medium
and plated onto four 10-cm dishes at the following ratios: 1:20, 1:10,
1:5, and the rest. The cells were allowed to recover for 24 h
before adding G-418. Colonies that survived selection were grown and
tested for the ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in response to histamine. SK-N-MC cells expressing the
human H3 receptor were derived as previously
described (Lovenberg et al., 1999
).
cAMP Accumulation. Transfected cells were plated on 96-well clear tissue culture plates. Confluent overnight cultures were then incubated with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F12 containing isobutylmethylxanthine (2 mM) for 20 min. Cells were then incubated with test compounds for 5 min, with histamine (various concentrations) for 5 min, and then with forskolin (5 µM) for 20 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with one-fifth volume 0.5 N HCl. Plates were placed at 4°C for at least 2 h and then the cell media was tested for cAMP concentration by radioimmunoassay with cAMP flashplates. When examining agonist potency, cells were treated with test compound alone before forskolin addition.
N-[3H]Methylhistamine Binding.
Cell pellets from SK-N-MC cells expressing either the rat or human
H3 receptor were homogenized in 20 mM
Tris-HCl/0.5 mM EDTA (for rat tissue analysis, frozen rat cortical
hemispheres were used instead of cell pellets). Supernatants from an
800g spin were collected and recentrifuged at
30,000g for 30 min. Pellets were rehomogenized in 50 mM
Tris/5 mM EDTA (pH 7.4). Membranes were incubated with 0.8 nM
N-[3H]methylhistamine plus/minus
test compounds for 45 min at 25°C and harvested by rapid filtration
over GF/C glass fiber filters (pretreated with 0.3% polyethylenimine)
followed by four washes with ice-cold buffer. Nonspecific binding was
defined with 10 µM histamine. IC50 values were
determined by a single site curve-fitting program (GraphPad, San Diego,
CA) and converted to Ki values based on a N-[3H]methylhistamine
Kd of 800 pM and a ligand
concentration of 800 pM (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973
).
RNA Blot. A blot containing poly(A)-selected RNA extracted from various rat tissues was obtained (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and probed with a 32P-labeled 600-bp cDNA encoding a fragment of the rat H3 receptor. The blot was hybridized with ExpressHyb (Clontech) for 2 h at 68°C and subsequently washed three times at room temperature in 2× SSC/0.05% SDS for 30 min followed by two washes at 50°C in 0.1× SSC/0.1% SDS for 30 min each. The blot was exposed to X-ray film (36 h) and developed.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rat and Human H3 Receptors Have High Sequence
Identity.
Screening of a size-selected rat hypothalamus cDNA
library resulted in the identification of a 2.4-kb cDNA clone. An open reading frame of 1335 bp was identified, encoding a putative protein of
445 amino acids. Homology comparison of the rat and human proteins, with Lipman-Pearson pairwise analysis (Lipman and Pearson, 1985
), revealed 93% overall sequence identity (Fig.
1). The putative seven transmembrane
domains are underlined in Fig. 1 and labeled TM1 to TM7. Analysis
within the seven transmembrane domains revealed 97% identity,
corresponding to a total of only five amino acid differences, as
denoted by asterisks in the figure. There are two amino acid changes
found in transmembrane domain 3 and a single change found in each of
transmembrane domains 4, 6, and 7.
|
Rat H3 Receptor Is Selectively Expressed in Brain.
We have previously demonstrated, via in situ hybridization, that the
rat ortholog of human H3 receptor is robustly
expressed in various regions of the rat brain. To determine expression
in both neural and nonneural tissue, RNA extracted from a variety of
rat tissues was probed for H3 receptor expression
via Northern blot analysis. Similar to the previous findings for the
human receptor, we could only identify the brain as the primary site of
expression of the histamine H3 receptor.
Detectable RNA expression was not present in heart, spleen, lung,
liver, skeletal muscle, kidney, or testes (Fig.
2).
|
Rat H3 Receptor-Expressing Cells Inhibit Adenylate
Cyclase in Response to H3 Agonists.
We have previously
shown that the human H3 receptor couples
negatively to adenylate cyclase. Therefore, cells transfected with the
recombinant rat receptor were tested for the same effect. Figure
3 shows that histamine, imetit, and
R-
-methylhistamine dose dependently inhibit
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation with EC50
values of 3, 0.5, and 0.5, respectively. These values are not only
similar to those observed for the human recombinant H3 receptor but also are consistent with
literature values for binding and function in rat tissues (i.e.,
nonrecombinant).
|
Rat H3 Receptor-Expressing Cells Bind
N-[3H]Methylhistamine with High
Affinity.
All binding studies were done on SK-N-MC cells stably
transfected with the rat or human H3 receptor.
Saturation isotherms show that
N-[3H]methylhistamine binds
saturably to the rat receptor with an apparent single site with high
affinity (Fig. 4). Nonspecific binding
was <10% at all concentrations tested. Scatchard transformation of
the saturation data revealed that the approximate
Kd for
N-[3H]methylhistamine binding to the
rat receptor was 0.8 nM (data not shown).
N-[3H]methylhistamine was used at a
concentration of 0.8 nM for the competition-binding studies.
Nontransfected SK-N-MC cells exhibit no specific binding of
N-[3H]methylhistamine (data not
shown).
|
Rat H3 Receptors Show a Different Pharmacological
Profile Than Human Receptors.
We had previously shown that the
recombinant human H3 receptor had a similar
pharmacological profile to that of the rat/mouse/guinea pig receptors,
which have been extensively characterized in various tissues over the
past decade. We tested the same compounds in this study for their
ability to bind to the recombinant rat receptor. For the purposes of
this study, binding affinities of the human recombinant receptor, the
rat recombinant receptor, and rat cortical tissue were simultaneously
determined for more accurate cross-comparisons. The agonists imetit,
immepip, histamine, R-alphamethylhistamine, and
N-methylhistamine were able to compete for rat recombinant H3 receptor binding with high affinity. The rank
order of potency was similar to that seen for the human recombinant
receptor and rat cerebral cortex (Table
1). However, when we tested the
antagonists thioperamide and clobenpropit, we found a distinct species
difference between the two compounds. Thioperamide showed a clear
difference in affinity between the two recombinant receptors, whereas
clobenpropit displayed high affinity for both receptors (~0.5 nM).
Specifically, thioperamide displayed high affinity for the recombinant
rat clone (4.2 nM), whereas it had low affinity (58 nM) for the human
recombinant receptor. The profile of the recombinant rat receptor was
identical with that seen with rat cerebral cortex as a receptor source
(Table 1). In addition, we had previously reported that clozapine did not compete for binding to the human H3 receptor
(Ki > 10 µM). In contrast, we found
that clozapine does effectively compete for binding to the recombinant
rat H3 receptor, albeit with low affinity (1.75 µM). We performed a correlation analysis comparing the
pKi values for rat recombinant
receptor binding versus the human recombinant receptor binding. A
highly significant correlation (r2 = 0.956) was observed when thioperamide was left out of the analysis, whereas a poor correlation (r2 = 0.711) was observed when thioperamide was included (Fig.
5). This analysis included all of the
compounds listed in Table 1 except clozapine.
|
|
Functional Antagonism in Recombinant H3 Receptors
Correlates with Binding Ki Values.
To
define the antagonist potency of various H3
ligands, we measured the pA2 values for
competitive antagonism of R-
-methylhistamine-induced inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. For the rat
receptor, Fig. 6, A and B show the
competitive antagonism by both thioperamide and clobenpropit,
respectively, with corresponding Schild regression analyses in Fig. 6,
C and D. The rat pA2 values for thioperamide and
clobenpropit were 8.56 and 9.53, respectively. The corresponding data
for the human receptor is shown in Fig. 6, E through H, where the human
pA2 values were 7.06 and 9.11 for thioperamide
and clobenpropit, respectively. Figure 7
shows the correlation between antagonist potency
(pA2) and binding affinity (pKi) for clobenpropit and
thioperamide in both species. The antagonist potency of the compounds
correlate highly with their binding affinities regardless of species
(r2 = 0.979). This shows that the
compounds are behaving as competitive antagonists and that the binding
affinities can be predictive of antagonist potency.
|
|
Functional Analysis in Recombinant Cells Confirms That
Chloroproxyfan Is an Agonist.
The known H3
ligand clorproxyfan was tested for its ability to modulate
histamine-induced inhibition of cAMP accumulation. Our initial analysis
with chloroproxyfan showed that it could not block the effects of
histamine. In fact, chloroproxyfan dose dependently enhanced
histamine-induced inhibition of cAMP accumulation (data not shown).
When analyzed in the absence of histamine, chloroproxyfan could dose
dependently inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase with an
EC50 of 2 nM (Fig.
8). This corresponds with its binding
affinity of 1 nM at both the rat and human recombinant receptors. In
addition, chloroproxyfan was a full agonist in that it was equally
efficacious to both histamine and R-
-methylhistamine at
inhibiting >90% of the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (data
not shown).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent cloning of the human histamine H3 receptor cDNA opens up a new area of study for function and pharmacological intervention of histamine function in the central nervous system. Although most of the data reported for the human clone were consistent with the known pharmacological properties of the rodent H3 receptor characterized in tissue, there were some interesting differences, most notably the low-affinity binding of the prototypical H3 antagonist thioperamide. One possible explanation for the low affinity was a simple species difference; however, there is evidence reported in the literature to suggest the existence of multiple H3 receptor subtypes. To address these two hypotheses, we cloned and pharmacologically characterized the rat ortholog of the H3 receptor.
We had previously identified, via PCR, a fragment of the rat ortholog
encoding the H3 receptor to map the mRNA
expression within the central nervous system. In doing so, we
determined that the rat H3 receptor was robustly
expressed in the cortex, striatum, thalamus, and hypothalamus. A
size-selected cDNA library from rat hypothalamus tissue was used to
identify a full-length clone consisting of 2.4 kb with a 1335-bp open
reading frame encoding a putative protein of 445 amino acids. The cDNA
clone showed high sequence identity to the human receptor with 93%
identity at the amino acid level. As expected, a majority of the
identity is observed within the transmembrane domains (97%), a result
of only five amino acid substitutions (Fig. 1). These transmembrane
domains contain the presumed binding pockets for agonists (e.g.,
histamine) as well as competitive antagonists (e.g., thioperamide). The
binding of various biogenic amines to their respective receptors
appears to be highly dependent on specific amino acid residues in
transmembrane domains 3, 5, and 6 (for reviews, see Jackson, 1991
;
Beck-Sickinger, 1996
). For example the conserved aspartic acid residue
in transmembrane 3 is thought to interact with the primary amine
function of catecholamines (Gros et al., 1998
) and serotonin (Boess et
al., 1998
). Likewise, the serine and threonine residues in
transmembrane domain 5 are thought to interact with the hydroxyl groups
on the catechol ring or indole ring of dopamine or serotonin,
respectively (Lee et al., 1994
, Liggett, 1999
). In fact,
mutagenesis studies of the histamine H1 receptor
show that the transmembrane domains are critical for histamine, as well
as antagonist binding (Wieland et al., 1999
). Because the
H3 receptor is highly related structurally, these
previous studies suggest that the five amino acid differences in the
transmembrane domains of the rat and human H3
receptors may account for the differences in the pharmacological
profiles of thioperamide and clozapine binding. Results from a
site-directed mutagenesis experiment will no doubt lead to a better
understanding of how histamine and synthetic H3
ligands interact with the receptor binding pocket as well as aid in the
development of more potent, selective ligands.
The tissue distribution of the rat H3 receptor,
by Northern blot analysis, was identical with that of the human in that
it was detected only in brain tissue. There is ample evidence in the
literature to suggest peripheral expression of the
H3 receptor, particulary on adrenergic and
cholinergic cells innervating the heart, lung, intestine, and spleen
among others (Cardell and Edvinsson, 1994
; Dimitriadou et al., 1994
;
Imamura et al., 1995
; Coruzzi et al., 2000
). Indeed, we noted
expression of human H3 receptor mRNA (via PCR)
from human small intestine, prostate, and testis but could not detect
mRNA expression in peripheral tissue via Northern blot (Lovenberg et
al., 1999
). Our attempts to identify peripheral expression in rat via
in situ hybridization have been unsuccessful due to technical
difficulties. The question of central versus peripheral subtypes of
H3 receptors thus awaits more careful expression
analysis of the cDNA we have cloned versus known sites of action. The
presynaptic nature of the receptor (i.e., distal expression of the mRNA
versus final location of the functional protein) makes it difficult to
correlate functional receptors with mRNA expression, particularly in
the periphery.
Functionally, the rat H3 receptor is similar to
the human in that it inhibits adenylate cyclase in response to
histamine and various selective H3 agonists.
Inhibition of adenylate cyclase is the mechanism of action shared by
the major release-inhibiting G-protein-coupled autoreceptors and
heteroreceptors such as
2 (norepinephrine),
D2 (dopamine), M2
(acetylcholine), 5HT1D (serotonin), and
H3 (histamine) (Langer, 1997
). Interestingly, the
dominant structural homology of the H3 receptor
in certain transmembrane domains is to
2 and
M2 receptors, not to H1 or
H2 receptors (Lovenberg et al., 1999
).
The EC50 values for agonist activation of the rat
H3 receptor were nearly identical with those for
activation of the human receptor. In addition, binding of the agonists
to the rat receptor showed similar affinity between the rat and the
human receptors. In contrast, antagonist binding showed several
pharmacological differences between the rat and human receptors. Our
previous report of antagonist Ki
values at the human receptor were mostly consistent with published data
for binding to rat tissues. However, one notable distinction was the
apparent low affinity of thioperamide for the human recombinant
receptor (58 nM). This finding has recently been confirmed by examining
the binding of N-[3H]methylhistamine
to human postmortem cerebral cortex where thioperamide had a reported
Ki of 200 nM (West et al., 1999
).
Earlier functional reports with human saphenous vein (Oike et al.,
1992
) and a human gastric cell line (Cherifi et al., 1992
) had alluded
to low Ki values for thioperamide. In
this article, we show that thioperamide displays high affinity for the
recombinant rat H3 receptor and the
H3 receptor expressed in rat cortex, consistent
with literature values for binding to rat tissue. Together, these data
suggest that the recombinant receptors are representative of the
natural binding affinities.
One other difference that was noted was the affinity of clozapine for
the rat receptor. Clozapine had previously been reported to bind to the
rat H3 receptor (from brain tissue), leading to speculation that some of its antipsychotic effects in humans may be due
to H3 receptor antagonism (Kathmann et al., 1994
,
Rodrigues et al., 1995
, Stark et al., 1996
). Our finding (Lovenberg et
al., 1999
) that clozapine did not significantly compete for binding to
the recombinant human receptor put serious doubt on the validity of the
hypothesis. However, our current findings with the rat recombinant
receptor confirm the validity of the original findings in rat tissue
because clozapine effectively competes for binding albeit with low
affinity (1.75 µM). These findings also suggest that much of the
differences in pharmacology reported in the literature may be due
solely to species differences and not H3
heterogeneity (West et al., 1990
). It does not however completely rule
out the existence of multiple H3 receptor
subtypes. Indeed, a recent article by Harper et al. (1999b)
demonstrates a lack of correlation between agonist
pKi values in the guinea pig cerebral
cortex versus guinea pig longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus, whereas
good correlation was seen between antagonist
pKi values. This could be suggestive of multiple subtypes of binding sites or may be reflective of complex
agonist binding. The development of radiolabeled antagonists may help
address this issue (Harper et al., 1999a
).
One of the difficult aspects of studying presynaptic receptors is the
determination of the functional potency of agonists and antagonists.
Approaches such as neurogenic ileum twitch and neurotransmitter release
are effective, but tend to be both labor-intensive and indirect. In
addition, a recent report highlighted that certain classes of compounds
behave as antagonists in the guinea pig ileum twitch assay, but
actually behave as agonists in neurotransmitter release assays (Sasse
et al., 1999
). These potential assay inconsistencies led us to evaluate
the use of the recombinant system to determine ligand affinities
simultaneously with the determination of agonist/antagonist function.
This current report demonstrates that the recombinant receptor systems
can be used to predict antagonist potency because the
pA2 values derived from Schild regression
analysis highly correlate with binding
pKi values regardless of compound or
species. In addition, the data demonstrate that the antagonism is
competitive because it is surmountable by high agonist concentrations.
In this report, we show that one can accurately determine
agonist/antagonist potency of various H3 ligands.
Previous reports have suggested that a series of substituted
"proxyfans," which were originally thought to be antagonists
(Ligneau et al., 1994
), were in fact agonists (Schlicker et al., 1996
,
Watt et al., 1997
). Because the recombinant H3
receptor systems have allowed an easy determination of agonist and
antagonist potency, we tested one of these compounds, chloroproxyfan.
In both the rat and human recombinant systems, chloroproxyfan behaved
as a pure, high-affinity receptor agonist. Although it can be argued
that that recombinant systems will not be representative of an intact
tissue, these systems allow one to easily determine an intrinsic
efficacy potential of a compound, particularly against the human
receptor where it is often difficult to obtain fresh, functional tissue preparations.
The availability of the rat cDNA will now allow for a full analysis of
various H3 receptor ligands, and hopefully will
help define the structure-activity requirements for the development of
better agonists and antagonists. There are clear pharmacological distinctions that will be critical for the development of novel H3 receptor ligands. Identification of additional
species orthologs of the H3 receptor, such as
guinea pig, also will be extremely useful because much of the
literature discrepancy surrounding H3 subtype
identification stems from differences between rat and guinea pig
H3 function and pharmacology (Schlicker et al.,
1996
).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Jose Galindo for his great help in assembling the sequence information, and Drs. Rob Leurs and Kersten Wieland for assistance in identification and correction of several sequence errors. We also thank Dr. Nigel Shankley for providing chloroproxyfan.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication February 12, 2000.
Received for publication December 14, 1999.
Send reprint requests to: Timothy W. Lovenberg, R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 3210 Merryfield Row, San Diego, CA 92121. E-mail: tlovenbe{at}prius.jnj.com
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
bp, base pair; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SSC, standard saline citrate.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Davenas, A. Rouleau, S. Morisset, and J. M. Arrang Autoregulation of McA-RH7777 Hepatoma Cell Proliferation by Histamine H3 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2008; 326(2): 406 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Haas, O. A. Sergeeva, and O. Selbach Histamine in the Nervous System Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1183 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. DeMorrow, H. Francis, and G. Alpini Biogenic Amine Actions on Cholangiocyte Function Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2007; 232(8): 1005 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Medhurst, A. R. Atkins, I. J. Beresford, K. Brackenborough, M. A. Briggs, A. R. Calver, J. Cilia, J. E. Cluderay, B. Crook, J. B. Davis, et al. GSK189254, a Novel H3 Receptor Antagonist That Binds to Histamine H3 Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease Brain and Improves Cognitive Performance in Preclinical Models J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 1032 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Esbenshade, G. B. Fox, K. M. Krueger, T. R. Miller, C. H. Kang, L. I. Denny, D. G. Witte, B. B. Yao, L. Pan, J. Wetter, et al. Pharmacological Properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile]: I. Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist with Drug-Like Properties J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2005; 313(1): 165 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Thurmond, P. J. Desai, P. J. Dunford, W.-P. Fung-Leung, C. L. Hofstra, W. Jiang, S. Nguyen, J. P. Riley, S. Sun, K. N. Williams, et al. A Potent and Selective Histamine H4 Receptor Antagonist with Anti-Inflammatory Properties J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 404 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takahashi, S. Tokita, and H. Kotani Generation and Characterization of Highly Constitutive Active Histamine H3 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 213 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Esbenshade, K. M. Krueger, T. R. Miller, C. H. Kang, L. I. Denny, D. G. Witte, B. B. Yao, G. B. Fox, R. Faghih, Y. L. Bennani, et al. Two Novel and Selective Nonimidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists A-304121 and A-317920: I. In Vitro Pharmacological Effects J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 887 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Seifert, K. Wenzel-Seifert, T. Burckstummer, H. H. Pertz, W. Schunack, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and S. Elz Multiple Differences in Agonist and Antagonist Pharmacology between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1-Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1104 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Hofstra, P. J. Desai, R. L. Thurmond, and W.-P. Fung-Leung Histamine H4 Receptor Mediates Chemotaxis and Calcium Mobilization of Mast Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1212 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Mcleod, C. A. Rizzo, R. E. West Jr., R. Aslanian, K. Mccormick, M. Bryant, Y. Hsieh, W. Korfmacher, G. G. Mingo, L. Varty, et al. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pillot, J. Ortiz, A. Heron, S. Ridray, J.-C. Schwartz, and J.-M. Arrang Ciproxifan, a Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist/Inverse Agonist, Potentiates Neurochemical and Behavioral Effects of Haloperidol in the Rat J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7272 - 7280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shin, E. Coates, N. J. Murgolo, K. L. Morse, M. Bayne, C. D. Strader, and F. J. Monsma Jr. Molecular Modeling and Site-Specific Mutagenesis of the Histamine-Binding Site of the Histamine H4 Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2002; 62(1): 38 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gomez-Ramirez, J. Ortiz, and I. Blanco Presynaptic H3 Autoreceptors Modulate Histamine Synthesis through cAMP Pathway Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2002; 61(1): 239 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wieland, G. Bongers, Y. Yamamoto, T. Hashimoto, A. Yamatodani, W. M. B. P. Menge, H. Timmerman, T. W. Lovenberg, and R. Leurs Constitutive Activity of Histamine H3 Receptors Stably Expressed in SK-N-MC Cells: Display of Agonism and Inverse Agonism by H3 Antagonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2001; 299(3): 908 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Kelley, T. Burckstummer, K. Wenzel-Seifert, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert Distinct Interaction of Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H2-Receptor with Guanidine-Type Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2001; 60(6): 1210 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, S. J. Wilson, C. Kuei, and T. W. Lovenberg Comparison of Human, Mouse, Rat, and Guinea Pig Histamine H4 Receptors Reveals Substantial Pharmacological Species Variation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2001; 299(1): 121 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Hough Genomics Meets Histamine Receptors: New Subtypes, New Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2001; 59(3): 415 - 419. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Silver, C. J. Mackins, N. C. E. Smith, I. L. Koritchneva, K. Lefkowitz, T. W. Lovenberg, and R. Levi Coupling of histamine H3 receptors to neuronal Na+/H+ exchange: A novel protective mechanism in myocardial ischemia PNAS, February 15, 2001; (2001) 51599198. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Drutel, N. Peitsaro, K. Karlstedt, K. Wieland, M. J. Smit, H. Timmerman, P. Panula, and R. Leurs Identification of Rat H3 Receptor Isoforms with Different Brain Expression and Signaling Properties Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2001; 59(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Silver, K. S. Poonwasi, N. Seyedi, S. J. Wilson, T. W. Lovenberg, and R. Levi Decreased intracellular calcium mediates the histamine H3-receptor-induced attenuation of norepinephrine exocytosis from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings PNAS, Januar |