![]() |
|
|
Vol. 293, Issue 2, 390-396, May 2000
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies in this laboratory showed that the overexpression of human aldehyde dehydrogenase class-1 (ALDH-1) with a retroviral vector resulted in increased resistance to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC), an active metabolite of cyclophosphamide. The present study examined the effect of ALDH-1 antisense RNA expression on ALDH-1 activity and sensitivity to 4-HC toxicity. Three different ALDH-1 cDNAs were synthesized that are either missing the N terminus (N), C terminus (C), or both (NC) and subcloned into the BamHI cloning site of pLXSN retroviral vector in the antisense (AS) orientation (AS-N, AS-C, and AS-NC, respectively). It was demonstrated that the overexpression of each of the AS constructs in K562 leukemic cells and A549 lung cancer cells results in suppression of ALDH-1 mRNA and enzymatic activity. Furthermore, the AS-N and AS-NC were generally more effective than AS-C in reducing the ALDH-1 activity. Both K562 and A549 cells expressing the ALDH-1 AS became significantly more sensitive to 4-HC toxicity as demonstrated by clonogenic and liquid culture assays. The increase in 4-HC sensitivity was in correlation with the degree of suppression of ALDH-1 activity. Moreover, such increase in 4-HC sensitivity, especially with AS-N and AS-NC, was to a similar degree seen with the use of diethylaminobenzaldehyde, a specific inhibitor of ALDH-1. These results indicate that ALDH-1 expression and activity can be specifically and effectively suppressed by AS RNA and lead to increased sensitivity to 4-HC.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aldehyde
dehydrogenase class-1 (ALDH-1) and class-3 (ALDH-3) are established
molecular determinants of sensitivity to oxazaphosphorines, a group of
important anticancer drugs that include cyclophosphamide, 4-hydroperoxycyclophamide (4-HC), mafosfamide, ifosfamide, and 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide. Both enzymes have been shown to catalyze the
detoxification of these drugs (Sreerama and Sladek, 1997
). The
overexpression of either ALDH-1 (Magni et al., 1996
; Moreb et al.,
1996
, 1998
) or ALDH-3 (Bunting and Townsend, 1996
) has been shown to
induce resistance to 4-HC or mafosfamide in vitro. These studies have
implications for the use of these enzymes in gene therapy strategies in
vivo mainly by increasing resistance of normal hematopoietic
progenitors and thus increasing the therapeutic index of the
oxazaphosphorine drugs.
With the same technology of gene transfer, a different strategy can be
pursued in which tumor cells are manipulated to down-regulate the
expression of ALDH-1 and thus become more sensitive to treatment with
oxazaphosphorines. One such strategy is to use antisense (AS) therapy
to suppress ALDH-1 protein production. Current strategies of AS therapy
target oncogenes or drug-resistance genes (Mercola and Cohen, 1995
;
Zhang, 1996
), with either AS oligonucleutides or in vivo expression of
AS molecule delivered by a vector. Advantages and disadvantages of each
approach have been discussed in Mercola and Cohen (1995)
, Tonkinson and
Stein (1996)
, Zhang (1996)
, and Crucio et al. (1997)
. One of the
advantages for gene transfer approach is the theoretical ability to
selectively target the AS expression in tumor cells.
Targeting the expression of ALDH-1 can be of great clinical
significance due to its presence in many tumor types (Sreerama and
Sladek, 1997
) and due to the fact that oxazaphosphorines are widely
used effective drugs. This study focuses on the effects of ALDH-1 AS
RNA on ALDH-1 expression and activity and subsequently on the
resistance to 4-HC with K562 leukemic cells and A549 lung cancer cells
in vitro. Our results show that ALDH-1 AS successfully decreases ALDH-1
expression and increases sensitivity to 4-HC.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Cultures. K562 leukemia and A549 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). The cells were maintained in liquid culture with RPMI 1640 culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and used when in the exponential log phase of their proliferation. TF-1, a leukemic cell line known for its high constitutive expression of ALDH-1, was used as a positive control.
ALDH-1 AS cDNA Synthesis and Construction of Expression
Vector.
Generation of the ALDH-1 cDNA with truncated 5' and 3'
termini was performed by polymerase chain reaction with primers
containing BamHI cloning sites and the 1570-base pair (bp)
cloned ALDH-1 cDNA template (Moreb et al., 1996
). The actual ALDH-1
cDNA is 1506 bp in length, including translational start and stop
codons. The difference between 1570 and 1506 is the result of a 64-bp 5' extension that is part of the nontranslated leading sequence for
ALDH-1. Three different AS cDNAs were synthesized as follows. The
1422-bp 3' truncated ALDH-1 cDNA was synthesized by using the 5' primer
(5'-GGATCCCGATCAGAACCAAATTGCTGAC-3') and the 3' primer
(5'-GGATCCACACTGTTCCTGCCT-3'), which removed 148 bp 5' of the
translational stop codon or the C terminus (AS-C); the 1351-bp 5'
truncated ALDH-1 cDNA was synthesized with the 3' primer (5'-GGCCATCCCGTTATGAGTTCTTCTGAGAGA-3') and the 5' primer
(5'-GGATCCAGAAGGAGATAAGGA-3'), which removed 219 bp from the 5' end,
including the 64-bp extension and 155 bp 3' of the translational start
codon or the N terminus (AS-N); and the 1203-bp 5'/3' truncated ALDH-1
cDNA was synthesized with the 5' primer (5'-GGATCCAGAAGGAGATAAGGA-3'),
which removed 219 bp from the 5' end, including the 64-bp extension and
155 bp 3' of the translational start codon as well as the 3' primer (5'-GGATCCACACTGTTCCTGCCT-3'), which removed 148 bp 5' of the translational stop codon (AS-NC).
Transfection of Tumor Cells.
K562 and A549 cells were
transfected separately with 10 µg of each of the pLXSN vector or the
vector constructs with the different AS cDNAs (AS-N, AS-NC, and AS-C)
with electroporation (Bio-Rad gene pulser; Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Richmond, CA) as described in Moreb et al. (1996)
. The cells were
selected in 1 mg/ml G418 (Geniticin; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg,
MD) for 2 to 3 weeks, and the resulting cell population was used for
all the experiments.
ALDH-1 Enzyme Activity.
ALDH-1 enzyme activity assay was
performed every 1 to 2 weeks on 0.5 to 2.0 × 107 cells collected by centrifugation from both
wild-type (WT) and transfected cells. The activity was measured as
described in Moreb et al. (1996)
. Briefly, cells were washed with 1×
PBS, lysed with 6 ml of buffer solution [50 mM Tris (pH 8), 25 mM
EDTA, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and
0.1% Sarcosyl], and centrifuged at 4°C and 40,000 rpm for 1 h.
Western Blot Analysis. Western blot analysis was performed to demonstrate changes in the protein levels of ALDH-1 and ALDH-3. However, due to low levels of expression of both enzymes in K562 cells, adequate Western analysis was possible only for A549 cells. Protein was extracted from cell lysates as described above, and equal amounts for each experimental group were size separated in a 10% denaturing SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Three identical gels were performed. One was stained with Coommassie blue to verify equal protein loading and the other two were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes that were blocked for 1 h in 5% nonfat dry milk dissolved in Tris-buffered sodium containing 0.05% Tween 20. The specific proteins were then visualized with either chicken anti-human ALDH-1 or ALDH-3 primary antibodies (supplied generously by Dr. Norman Sladek, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis) at 1:400 dilution, secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-labeled rabbit anti-chicken antibody; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 1:8000 dilution, and the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) method (ECL Western blotting kit; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).
Southern Analysis.
DNA was extracted and quantitated from
K562 cells of the four experimental groups (WT, AS-N, AS-NC, and AS-C)
as described in Moreb et al. (1998)
. To determine genomic integration
of the AS cDNAs, 25 µg of DNA from each group was digested with
BamHI, BstXI, EcoRI, and
HindIII, then separated on a 0.8% agarose gel. After
capillary blotting onto a nylon membrane (MSI, Westborough, MA) in 20×
standard saline citrate overnight, the membrane was exposed to UV
(Stratalinker UV Crosslinker 1800; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and then
baked at 80°C for 2 h. The blot was hybridized overnight at
65°C with random-primer [32P]deoxy cytidine
5'-triphosphate (dCTP)-labeled ALDH-1 cDNA, and washed three times at
room temperature before being autoradiographed. Blots were exposed to
X-ray film with two intensifying screens at
80°C.
Northern Analysis.
Northern analysis was used to detect
expression of the AS RNA and its effect on ALDH-1 mRNA. Total RNA was
extracted from K562 cells of each experimental group with the
Chomczynski and Sacchi method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987
). Total RNA
(20 µg/lane) was separated on 1.2% agarose formaldehyde gel and
blotted onto a nylon membrane (MSI) by capillary transfer for 2 days.
The blots were hybridized overnight at 42°C with random-primer
[32P]dCTP-labeled ALDH-1 cDNA, and washed with
0.2× standard saline citrate and 0.1% SDS first at room temperature
and afterward at 56°C before being autoradiographed. Blots were
exposed to X-ray film with two intensifying screens at
80°C. These
same blots were stripped and reprobed twice, once with Neo cDNA for
correlation of Neo and ALDH-1 expression, and another with
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a housekeeping gene,
to assess equal loading of RNA or any nonspecific effects related to
the AS expression.
In Vitro 4-HC Treatment Assay.
Diethylaminobenzaldehyde
(DEAB), 4-HC, and phenylketophosphamide, a synthetic 4-HC analog not
metabolized by ALDH-1, were generously supplied by Dr. Michael Colvin
(Duke University, Durham, NC) and kept at
20°C until used. A
solution of 1 µg/µl 4-HC was prepared in culture medium, filter
sterilized (0.2 µm), and kept on ice immediately before use. DEAB (an
ALDH-1 inhibitor) also was prepared 10 to 15 min before use. To
investigate the effect of AS RNA on sensitivity to 4-HC, K562 cells
(5 × 104 cells/ml) or A549 cells (2.5 × 104 cells/ml) from each experimental group
(WT, AS-N, AS-NC, and AS-C) were treated with 4-HC and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. In some experiments, a separate WT cell group was
treated with 25 µM DEAB for 15 min before the addition of 4-HC to
compare the effect of the inhibitor versus ALDH-1 AS on sensitivity to
4-HC. After 4-HC treatment, cells were washed twice with chilled
culture medium (RPMI with 10% FBS), then plated. K562 cells were
plated in methylcellulose containing 25% FBS or in liquid culture
in RPMI containing 10% FBS, as described in Moreb et al. (1998)
. Colonies were counted on day 7 of methylcellulose cultures with an
inverted microscope. The total number of viable cells in liquid cultures was determined twice within a 7-day period. Viability was
determined by the trypan blue exclusion criteria. A549 cells were
plated in liquid colony assay with four 35-mm petri dishes per group.
Colonies (>10 cells) adhered to the bottom of the plate were counted
on day 4 with an inverted microscope. Untreated A549 cells were plated
similarly at 250 cells/ml/dish.
Statistical Analysis. Statistical significance of the difference between experimental groups was calculated with Student's t test for two means. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ALDH-1 Activity Measurements in K562 Cells. To determine the effect of AS RNA on ALDH-1 expression, ALDH-1 enzyme activity was measured in all experimental groups. Because the results with WT cells and those transfected with pLXSN vector only were similar in multiple experiments for both K562 and A549 (Table 1), only the results with WT cells are reported throughout the manuscript. Furthermore, transfected cells had similar morphology and proliferation characteristics as WT cells. ALDH-1 activity was measured over a 3-month period for each AS K562 cell type. Initially, all of the AS cells showed a significant decrease in ALDH-1 activity, however, ALDH-1 activity was restored by day 40 of culture and while the cells were maintained without G418 (Table 2). ALDH-1 AS expression was regained and a decrease in the ALDH-1 activity was achieved again in the same cells on reexposure and maintenance in 1 mg/ml G418. Figure 1 represents the mean ± S.E. of the activity measured over several weeks of culture for each experimental group. The ALDH-1 activity in AS-N and AS-NC cells was significantly lower than that for WT cells (P < .001). Although reduction in ALDH-1 activity was seen in the AS-C cells as well (Table 2), it did not reach significance when the overall mean was compared with that of the WT cells. This is most likely explained by lack of consistent effect of AS-C on blocking the translation of ALDH-1 protein and fluctuation in its activity over time in the AS-C K562 cells.
|
|
|
ALDH-1 AS Integration and Expression in K562 Cells.
In view of
the reduction in ALDH-1 activity, and to verify that this reduction is
indeed the result of the ALDH-1 AS cDNA genomic integration and mRNA
expression, several studies were performed. Figure
2 shows a Southern analysis in which DNA
from the different K562 experimental groups was digested with four different restriction enzymes, blotted, and labeled with
32P-labeled ALDH-1 cDNA. Digestion with
BamHI, the cloning site for ALDH-1 cDNAs in the pLXSN
vector, reveals two DNA bands that were common among all groups and
most likely represent the genomic ALDH-1 DNA. Other bands of different
sizes (1351, 1422, and 1203 bp) represent the AS ALDH-1 cDNAs: AS-N,
AS-C, and AS-NC, respectively. Digestion with EcoRI, which
cuts once in the vector upstream to the ALDH-1 cDNA, and
HindIII, which cuts once in the vector downstream to the
ALDH-1 cDNA, both showed two extra bands with all AS groups compared
with WT DNA, indicating two different integration sites. Digestion with
a noncut restriction enzyme, BstXI, resulted in at least two
DNA fragment larger than the vector that are not seen in the WT DNA and
are different in size among the different AS clones. Overall, these
results demonstrate the genomic integration of the AS vector constructs
in two different sites.
|
|
|
ALDH-1 AS Overexpression Sensitizes K562 Cells to 4-HC. To determine whether ALDH-1 AS RNA expression led to increased sensitivity to 4-HC, K562 cells, either WT or expressing ALDH-1 AS (AS-C, AS-N and AS-NC), were treated with various doses of 4-HC (10 and 15 µg/ml) and cultured in methylcellulose colony assay or liquid culture. Table 2 shows the results obtained from one of three representative experiments with similar results. Data represent the mean ± S.D. of the total colonies counted as well as the percentage recovery after 4-HC treatment compared with untreated cells. It is shown that cells expressing ALDH-1 AS were more sensitive to 4-HC than WT cells with AS-N and AS-NC exhibiting significantly increased sensitivity (P < .005) compared with AS-C. These results correspond well to the ALDH-1 activity results shown in Fig. 1. Table 3 also shows that the addition of 25 µM DEAB 10 min before the treatment of WT cells with 10 µg/ml 4-HC affected 4-HC sensitivity to a similar proportion seen with AS-N and AS-NC. Furthermore, similar treatment with 15 µg/ml phenylketophosphamide showed no significant difference between the WT and AS cells, indicating the specificity of the ALDH-1 AS effects.
|
|
|
ALDH-1 AS Overexpression Reduces ALDH-1 Activity and Sensitizes
A549 Cells to 4-HC.
To study the effectiveness of the AS approach
when large amounts of the target mRNA is present, we overexpressed the
same AS constructs in A549 NSCLC cell line, which is known to have very
high levels of both ALDH-1 and ALDH-3 (Sreerama and Sladek, 1997
).
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relationship between ALDH-1 and resistance to the
oxazaphosphorines has been established for many years mainly through correlative studies, use of ALDH-1 inhibitors, and most recently by
gene transfer studies (Kohn and Sladek, 1985
; Sladek and Landkamer, 1985
; Russo and Hilton, 1988
; Bunting and Townsend, 1996
; Magni et al.,
1996
; Moreb et al., 1996
, 1998
; Sreerama and Sladek, 1997
). Because of
several other potential mechanisms of resistance against oxazaphosphorines (McGowan and Fox, 1986
; Yuan et al., 1990
; Friedman et al., 1992
; O'Conner et al., 1992
), the exact contribution of ALDH-1
to that resistance in any cell type is still being debated and studied.
In this report, we show that suppression of ALDH-1 expression (Figs. 3
and 5) and activity (Tables 2 and 6) with gene transfer to express
ALDH-1 AS RNA in two different cell lines, results in a significant
increase in the sensitivity to 4-HC, an active metabolite of
cyclophosphamide. The increase in sensitivity to 4-HC in some of the
cells with ALDH-1 AS was similar to that seen with DEAB, a specific
inhibitor of ALDH-1.
AS strategies for gene silencing have attracted much attention in
recent years and despite potential obstacles, AS technology (oligonucleutides or AS genes) has been widely used in the laboratory for studying gene function and in recent years introduced into the
treatment of cancer patients. Because cyclophosphamide (CP) is one of
the most commonly used alkylating agents and because one of the
resistance mechanisms to CP is high levels of ALDH-1, a strategy to
reduce ALDH-1 protein with gene transfer to express AS RNA in tumor
cells may increase the therapeutic index of CP and lead to a higher
rate of complete responses. Our studies demonstrate that such a
strategy can be effective, both in K562 cells with low constitutive
expression of ALDH-1 and in A549 cells with very high constitutive
expression of ALDH-1, and in the presence of high levels of ALDH-3 as
well. Given the promising results with A549 NSCLC cell line, an AS
approach can potentially be used in the treatment of locally advanced
NSCLC cells. Similar to phase I gene therapy studies already reported
(Roth et al., 1996
; Tursz et al., 1996
), an adenoviral vector
containing the ALDH-1 AS can be directly injected into locally advanced
NSCLC cells, then treated with i.v. CP. Such strategy to reduce the
levels of ALDH-1 may increase the therapeutic index of CP and lead to
higher rates of response.
Another approach to increasing sensitivity of tumors to CP has been
reported by Chen et al. (1996)
and is based on the use of cytochrome
P450 (CYP) gene CYP2B1, which activates the prodrug CP into its
4-hydroxy-CP active metabolite. Such activation occurs normally in the
liver in vivo, however, overexpression of the CYP2B1 in tumor cells was
shown to increase susceptibility to CP and ifosfamide. Such approach
might have limited use in tumors expressing high levels of ALDH-1 or
ALDH-3. Therefore, our approach could have greater clinical
implications and could possibly be used in conjunction with other
approaches such as the one mentioned above.
The significance of aldehyde dehydrogenases in the oxidation of
retinaldehyde to retinoic acid has been known for many years (Lee et al., 1991
; Labrecque et al., 1995
; Bhat et al., 1996
; Zhao et al., 1996
). Because of the recently demonstrated critical role
of ALDH-1 in embryonic differentiation by converting retinaldehyde to
retinoic acid (Berggren et al., 1999
; McCaffery et al., 1999
), our AS
approach to studying the function of ALDH-1 may have another potentially significant use in studying embryonic differentiation.
Of interest is the difference in effectiveness of the different AS
constructs we used. Our results suggest that AS sequences missing the N
terminus (AS-N and AS-NC) are more effective in blocking ALDH-1
activity than the sequence missing the C terminus (AS-C). Such effect
has been described in Ch'ng et al. (1989)
and the most likely
explanation is that the sense-AS duplex is protected against the
ribosome's unwinding activity during RNA translation when the AS
molecule is missing the N terminus (Shaki-Eshleman and Liebhaber,
1988
). Thus, in spite of good levels of AS-C mRNA (Fig. 3), AS-C was
less effective in reducing the ALDH-1 activity and increasing 4-HC
sensitivity in K562 cells (Fig. 1 and Table 3). Similar differences,
although to a lesser degree, were seen in A549 cells (Fig. 5 and Table
6). Several other factors that determine the effectiveness of an AS
molecule have been reported and include the following: 1) rate of
transcription of the AS versus sense gene; 2) stability of the AS gene;
3) target site of the AS RNA; 4) rate of duplex formations; and 5)
location of the AS gene versus that of the targeted gene (Mercola and
Cohen, 1995
; Zhang, 1996
; Arndt and Hank, 1997
). Any one or combination of these factors could have contributed to the different effectiveness of AS-C.
Finally, our results suggest that growing the ALDH-1 AS cells in the absence of G418 selective pressure, results in the loss of AS mRNA expression and rebound increase in the WT ALDH-1 mRNA (Fig. 4). We are not aware of any previous reports on such rebound phenomenon with the AS strategy. Although it is reversible after re-exposure to G418 in vitro, it is clearly of concern because according to our results (Table 5), it can result in the opposite effect, i.e., an increase in resistance to 4-HC or CP of the affected tumor cells. However, sensitizing the cells to the toxicity of 4-HC or CP may result in the elimination of all cells expressing the AS and, therefore, such rebound phenomenon may not be clinically significant. In vivo studies with an animal model are essential to address the significance of such phenomenon. Last, the mechanism for such loss of AS expression was most likely due to the absence of selection pressure because re-exposure to G418 resulted in the restoration of AS effect and continuous exposure to 0.4 to 1 mg/ml G418 maintains the expression of the different AS mRNAs. Furthermore, repeat Southern analysis, with DNA obtained from all the experimental groups during the loss of AS expression and digested with BamHI, continued to show the presence of the different AS cDNAs (data not shown).
In summary, we have defined ALDH-1 AS constructs that can effectively reduce the ALDH-1 expression and activity and increase sensitivity to 4-HC in vitro. Our studies again demonstrate the significant contribution of ALDH-1 to the resistance against oxazaphosphorines and, therefore, the potential clinical application of ALDH-1 AS RNA in cancer treatment. Any such clinical application will have to specifically target the tumor cells to avoid introducing the ALDH-1 AS into normal cells.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Connie Cohoon for assistance in preparation of this manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication January 7, 2000.
Received for publication November 1, 1999.
1 This study was supported by Grant R29-CA59684 awarded by the National Cancer Institute (to J.S.M.).
Send reprint requests to: Jan S. Moreb, M.D., Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, P.O. Box 100277, Gainesville, FL 32610-0277. E-mail: morebjs{at}medicine.ufl.edu
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ALDH-1, aldehyde dehydrogenase class-1; 4-HC, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide; AS, antisense; NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; FBS, fetal bovine serum; bp, base pair; WT, wild type; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; dCTP, deoxy cytidine 5'-triphosphate; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; DEAB, diethylaminobenzaldehyde; CP, cyclophosphamide; CYP, cytochrome P450.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Pearce, D. Taussig, C. Simpson, K. Allen, A. Z. Rohatiner, T. A. Lister, and D. Bonnet Characterization of Cells with a High Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity from Cord Blood and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Samples Stem Cells, June 1, 2005; 23(6): 752 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Moreb, A. Gabr, G. R. Vartikar, S. Gowda, J. R. Zucali, and D. Mohuczy Retinoic Acid Down-Regulates Aldehyde Dehydrogenase and Increases Cytotoxicity of 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and Acetaldehyde J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2005; 312(1): 339 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||