JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Trizna, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Trizna, W.

Vol. 290, Issue 1, 38-42, July 1999

Transport of [3H]Losartan across Isolated Perfused Rabbit Proximal Tubule

Richard M. Edwards, Elwood J. Stack and Walter Trizna

Department of Renal Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The transport of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan and its interaction with organic anion transport were examined in the isolated perfused rabbit proximal tubule. Losartan reversibly inhibited the secretion of para-aminohippurate (PAH) in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 = 15 ± 0.5 µM). Other angiotensin II receptor antagonists also inhibited PAH secretion with similar potencies: eprosartan, 11 ± 2.3 µM; irbesartan, 17 ± 2.2 µM; and valsartan 3 ± 0.6 µM. [3H]Losartan was secreted by the proximal tubule by a saturable and probenecid-sensitive mechanism. The affinity of losartan for the organic anion transporter (Km = 12.3 ±1.8 µM) was significantly greater than that of PAH (Km = 88.5 ± 10.7 µM). [3H]Losartan secretion was stimulated in the presence of alpha -ketoglutarate, suggesting that losartan, like PAH, enters the cell in exchange for a dicarboxylate. These results demonstrate that losartan and probably other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists are secreted by an organic anion transporter that is similar to, if not identical with, the classic PAH transporter.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists represent a new class of drugs with therapeutic use in hypertension and possibly other cardiovascular disorders (MacFayden and Reid, 1994). Losartan was the first of this group of compounds to be approved for the management of hypertension (Johnston, 1995). As a class, the angiotensin II receptor antagonists are highly protein bound and are anions at physiological pH (Csajka et al., 1997). The metabolism and elimination of the angiotensin II receptor antagonists are varied. For example, some angiotensin II receptor antagonists are extensively metabolized in the liver, generating active and/or inactive metabolites, which are eliminated in the bile or by the kidney (e.g., losartan and irbesartan) (Csajka et al., 1997), whereas others undergo little metabolism and are excreted in the bile and urine largely as unchanged drug (e.g., eprosartan) (Cox et al., 1996). In most cases, however, some proportion of the administered dose appears unchanged in the urine (Csajka et al., 1997), suggesting that these molecules may be secreted by the renal organic anion transporter. Evidence that these molecules may interact with renal organic anion transport comes from studies showing that losartan increased uric acid excretion and lowered plasma levels of uric acid in both healthy subjects (Nakashima et al., 1992) and hypertensive patients (Tsunoda et al., 1993). Subsequent studies demonstrated that losartan and, to a much lesser extent, EXP3174, the active metabolite of losartan, and eprosartan inhibited urate/anion exchange in proximal tubule brush border membrane vesicles from rat (Edwards et al., 1996) and human (Roch-Ramel et al., 1997) kidney.

Although the above studies showed that losartan could interact with organic anion reabsorption, little direct evidence exists as to whether losartan and other angiotensin II receptor antagonists can interact with organic anion secretion and whether this class of compounds is secreted by the renal organic anion transporter. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to examine the interaction of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, principally losartan, with renal organic anion secretion and to characterize the transport of [3H]losartan across the proximal tubule.

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Preparation and Perfusion of Isolated Tubules. Isolated tubules were perfused in vitro according to previously published methods (Edwards and Grantham, 1983). Male New Zealand White rabbits (2.5-3 kg) were anesthetized with i.v. pentobarbital, and a kidney was removed. Thin slices were cut and stored in chilled dissection solution consisting of 14 mM KCl, 44 mM K2HPO4, 14 mM KH2PO4, 8 mM NaHCO3, 160 mM sucrose, and 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4. Proximal tubule S2 segments were dissected, transferred to a temperature-controlled chamber, and mounted onto micropipettes. In most experiments, the tubules were bathed and perfused with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), supplemented with 25 mM NaHCO3 and equilibrated to pH 7.4 with 95% O2/5% CO2. In some experiments, the bath and perfusion solutions consisted of a HEPES-buffered solution that contained 116 mM NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM sodium acetate, 8.3 mM glucose, and 5 mM alanine, pH 7.4.

After the initiation of perfusion, the bath temperature was gradually increased to 37°C, and the tubule was allowed to equilibrate for at least 15 min. Throughout the experiment, bath solution was pumped through the chamber at 0.4 ml/min, and the tubules were perfused by gravity at a rate of 10 to 15 nl/min. Each experiment consisted of an initial control period followed by various experimental periods as described in Results. After warming and equilibration at 37°C, the bath solution was changed to one containing [3H]para-aminohippurate (PAH) or [3H]losartan with varying amounts of unlabeled substrate. After at least 10 min, two to four timed collections of perfusate were made over the ensuing 15 to 20 min, with a constant volume constriction pipette for measurement of control secretion rates. The bath was then changed to various experimental conditions as depicted in Results, and after a 10-min equilibration period, two to four collections were made as described above. Preliminary experiments showed that PAH or losartan secretion was stable for at least 2 h, and therefore, attempts were made to complete experiments within this time frame.

The secretory (bath to lumen) fluxes of (JPAH) and losartan (JLOS) were calculated as described by Edwards and Grantham (1983):
<UP>J<SUB>PAH or LOS</SUB></UP>=(V<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>C<SUB><UP>c</UP></SUB>)<UP>/</UP>(<UP>SA</UP>)(L) (1)
where Vc is the fluid collection rate (in nl/min), Cc is the concentration of [3H]PAH or [3H]losartan in the collected fluid (in cpm/nl), SA is the specific activity of [3H]PAH or [3H]losartan, and L is the tubule length (in mm). In each experiment, a secretory flux for a given experimental period was determined by averaging the two to four collections made during that period. The secretion of PAH or losartan is expressed as fmol/min/mm or as a percentage of control values. In a limited number of experiments, the lumen-to-bath flux of [3H]losartan was measured. In these experiments, tubules were superfused at a rate of 0.4 ml/min with DMEM-NaHCO3 and perfused with the same solution containing 15 µCi/ml [3H]losartan and unlabeled losartan at a final concentration of 50 µM. The lumen-to-bath flux (Jl-b) was measured by the rate of appearance of [3H]losartan in the continuously collected bath medium according to:
<UP>J<SUB>l−b</SUB></UP>=<UP>cpm<SUB>b</SUB>/</UP>(<UP>SA</UP>)(t)(L) (2)
where cpmb represents the counts collected in the bath, SA is the specific activity of [3H]losartan in the perfusate, t is the collection time, and L is the tubule length. For each tubule, Jl-b was determined from the average of three 10-min collections.

The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and were analyzed by Student's t test or ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons. A value of p < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. The n values refer to the number of tubules. Saturation and competition curves were analyzed by nonlinear regression analysis (GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA).

Chemicals. [3H]PAH (specific activity, 1.28 Ci/mmol) and [3H]losartan (DuP 753; specific activity, 43.9 Ci/mmol) were obtained from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). Losartan, eprosartan, valsartan, and irbesartan were provided by the Department of Medicinal and Synthetic Chemistry (SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, PA). All other reagents were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Initial experiments were conducted to determine whether losartan could cis-inhibit PAH transport as would be expected if an organic anion competed for the same transporter as PAH. As shown in Fig. 1, losartan rapidly and reversibly inhibited PAH secretion by isolated perfused proximal tubules. In the presence of 10 µM [3H]PAH, JPAH during the control period was 382 ± 4.9 fmol/min/mm. The addition of 10 µM losartan to the bath significantly (p = .0003) inhibited PAH secretion by approximately 40% to 232 ± 3.5 fmol/min/mm. On removal of losartan, PAH secretion returned to control values: 359 ± 9.6 fmol/min/mm. The inhibitory effect of losartan, as well as the other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists (eprosartan, valsartan, and irbesartan), was concentration dependent (Fig. 2). The concentrations of the antagonists needed to inhibit PAH secretion by 50% were 15 ± 0.5 µM for losartan, 11 ± 2.3 µM for eprosartan, 3 ± 0.6 µM for valsartan, and 17 ± 2.2 µM for irbesartan. Valsartan was significantly (p < .05) more potent than the other angiotensin II receptor antagonists in inhibiting PAH secretion.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Time course of the reversible inhibition of [3H]PAH secretion (JPAH) by losartan in the proximal tubule. During the control and recovery periods, the bath contained 10 µM [3H]PAH. Losartan (10 µM) was added to the bath at the indicated time (10-30 min). Results are the mean ± S.E.M. of four tubules.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of losartan, eprosartan, valsartan, and irbesartan on [3H]PAH secretion (JPAH). Concentration of [3H]PAH was 10 µM. Results are expressed as a percent of control JPAH, which was 365 ± 35 fmol/min/mm. Each point is the mean ± S.E.M. of three or four tubules.

The previous experiments demonstrated that losartan could inhibit PAH secretion, suggesting that it interacted with the PAH transporter. To determine whether losartan itself was transported, additional experiments examined the transport of [3H]losartan. The addition of 10 µM [3H]losartan to the bath resulted in a JLOS of 598 ± 54 fmol/min/mm. Probenecid, a classic inhibitor of the organic anion transporter, produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of losartan secretion (Fig. 3), with half-maximal inhibition occurring at a concentration of 17.9 ± 4.0 µM. PAH was much less effective in inhibiting [3H]losartan secretion, with an IC50 value of 0.9 ± 0.2 mM. Figure 4 shows the relationship between the bath concentration of [3H]losartan and JLOS. The bath-to-lumen transport of [3H]losartan was clearly saturable. Double reciprocal plots revealed an apparent affinity (Km) of 12.3 ± 1.8 µM and a maximal transport rate (Vmax) of 1490 ± 22 fmol/min/mm (n = 3). For comparison, similar experiments were performed with [3H]PAH (Fig. 5). Apparent Km and Vmax values for PAH were 88.5 ± 10.7 µM and 3939 ± 561 fmol/min/mm, respectively, values similar to those previously reported for JPAH in the rabbit S2 segment (Shimomura et al., 1981). The apparent Km value and the Vmax value for losartan were significantly different from the corresponding values for PAH (p = .002 and p = .01, respectively). The data shown in Figs. 4 and 5 represent total bath-to-lumen fluxes of PAH and losartan, which are composed of both active and passive components. In preliminary experiments, we measured the secretion of PAH and losartan over the same concentration range as shown in Figs. 4 and 5 in the presence of 5 mM probenecid to block active secretion (Shimomura et al., 1981). Under these conditions, both PAH and losartan passive fluxes were similar and never exceeded 6% of the total flux at any substrate concentration, and therefore, we did not correct for the passive component.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of probenecid and PAH on [3H]losartan secretion (JLOS). Concentration of [3H]losartan was 10 µM. Results are expressed as a percent of control JLOS, which was 598 ± 10.6 fmol/min/mm. Each point is the mean ± S.E.M. of four tubules.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   [3H]Losartan secretion (JLOS) as a function of bath losartan concentration. Top, JLOS was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of losartan added to the bath (5-500 µM). Bottom, double reciprocal plot of the data. Apparent Km and Vmax values were 12.3 ± 1.8 µM and 1490 ± 22 fmol/min/mm, respectively (n = 3).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   [3H]PAH secretion (JPAH) as a function of bath PAH concentration. Top, JPAH was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of PAH added to the bath (5-500 µM). Bottom, double reciprocal plot of the data. Apparent Km and Vmax values were 88.5 ± 10.7 µM and 3939 ± 561 fmol/min/mm, respectively (n = 3).

In four tubules, the lumen-to-bath flux of [3H]losartan was measured. When perfused with 50 µM losartan, the lumen-to-bath flux amounted to 54 ± 11.1 fmol/min/mm and was unaffected by 1 mM probenecid (53.5 ± 3.3 fmol/min/mm). This represented only 4.6% of the bath-to-lumen flux of losartan measured at the same concentration (1164 ± 77 fmol/min/mm).

According to the current model of organic anion secretion in the proximal tubule (Shimada et al., 1987; Pritchard, 1988), PAH and other organic anions enter the cell across the basolateral membrane in exchange for alpha -ketoglutarate (alpha -KG) moving out of the cell down its concentration gradient. The intracellular concentration of alpha -KG is maintained by intracellular synthesis as well as Na+-coupled entry of the dicarboxylate into the cell. Accordingly, exposure of the cells to alpha -KG should stimulate the uptake and secretion of an organic anion if it is transported by the organic anion/alpha -KG exchanger. To determine whether losartan transport was affected by alpha -KG, JLOS was measured in tubules exposed to increasing concentrations of alpha -KG added to the bath. For these experiments, we used a bicarbonate-free HEPES-buffered solution in which the effects of alpha -KG are more readily demonstrable (Shpun et al., 1995). As shown in Fig. 6, both PAH and losartan secretion were stimulated by the addition of alpha -KG to the bathing medium. In the absence of alpha -KG, both JPAH and JLOS were markedly reduced compared with values obtained in previous experiments using DMEM: 59.6 ± 7.8 versus 412 ± 19.9 fmol/min/mm for PAH and 95.9 ± 4.8 versus 683 ± 50.2 fmol/min/mm for losartan. Significant (p < .05) stimulation of PAH secretion occurred at concentrations of alpha -KG of 10 µM and above, whereas stimulation of losartan secretion was not observed until a concentration of 30 µM alpha -KG. At 10 µM alpha -KG, JPAH values (505 ± 91 fmol/min/mm) were similar to those obtained in DMEM, whereas 100 µM alpha -KG was required to increase JLOS (616 ± 34.4 fmol/min/mm) to values obtained in DMEM.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of alpha -KG on JPAH and JLOS. Tubules were perfused and bathed with a HEPES-based buffer in the presence of increasing concentrations of alpha -KG added to the bath. Concentrations of [3H]PAH and [3H]losartan were 10 µM. Results are expressed as a percent of control secretion in the absence of added alpha -KG and were 59.6 ± 7.8 fmol/min/mm for PAH and 95.9 ± 4.8 fmol/min/mm for losartan. Results are mean ± S.E.M. of three tubules for each anion. *p < .05 versus control.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The renal organic anion transporter or transporters are responsible for the transepithelial movement of a large number of endogenous substances, as well as numerous xenobiotics (Moller and Sheikh, 1983). The present study is the first to characterize the renal tubule secretion of a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, a class of compounds with increasing importance in the treatment of hypertension (MacFayden and Reid, 1994). The results of this study demonstrate that [3H]losartan is secreted by the proximal tubule in a manner similar to the prototypical organic anion, PAH. This conclusion is based on the observations that losartan and PAH cis-inhibited the secretion of each other, that [3H]losartan secretion was saturable and was inhibited by probenecid, and that [3H]losartan secretion was stimulated by the presence of alpha -KG. No evidence for a significant reabsorptive flux of losartan was obtained.

Despite these similarities, there were quantitative differences in the characteristics of secretion of these two anions across the proximal tubule; chief among these was the much higher affinity of the transporter for losartan (12.3 µM) than for PAH (88.5 µM) and the difference in Vmax values. This was also reflected in the more effective inhibition of PAH secretion by losartan than inhibition of losartan secretion by PAH. Furthermore, PAH secretion appeared to be more sensitive to the effects of alpha -KG than did losartan. These latter experiments were conducted in a bicarbonate-free, HEPES-based buffer in which the stimulatory effects of alpha -KG on organic anion transport are more readily apparent (Shpun et al., 1995). This is presumably due to a reduction in cellular ATP levels and tricarboxylic cycle intermediates in proximal tubules in the absence of bicarbonate (Shpun et al., 1995). This is reflected in the markedly reduced rate of PAH secretion in the absence of bicarbonate compared with that in the presence of bicarbonate observed in this and other studies (Dantzler and Evans, 1996). In these metabolically compromised tubules, the addition of exogenous alpha -KG causes a marked increase in organic anion uptake by increasing alpha -KG/organic anion countertransport as well as cellular metabolism in general (Shpun et al., 1995). Similar to observations made in basolateral membrane vesicles (Pritchard, 1988) and renal slices (Pritchard, 1990), alpha -KG produced a biphasic effect on JPAH. At concentrations up to 30 µM, alpha -KG caused a concentration-dependent increase in JPAH. This likely reflects both cis- and trans-stimulation of PAH/alpha -KG exchange, as was also observed for fluorescein secretion in the proximal tubule (Welborn et al., 1998). The JPAH values at 30 µM alpha -KG were similar to those obtained in experiments performed in bicarbonate-containing media. However, at 100 µM alpha -KG, JPAH was reduced relative to values obtained at 30 µM, possibly reflecting competition with PAH for binding to the transporter or to saturation of the Na+/dicarboxylate cotransporter and a reduction in the in>out alpha -KG gradient that drives the alpha -KG/PAH exchanger (Pritchard, 1990). In contrast, losartan secretion was not stimulated until exogenous concentrations of alpha -KG reached 30 µM and 100 µM alpha -KG was required for JLOS values to approach those obtained in bicarbonate-containing buffer. Differences in sensitivity of organic anion transport to alpha -KG have also been observed between urate and PAH transport in pig basolateral membrane vesicles (Werner and Roch-Ramel, 1991). This difference, together with differences in Cl- dependence and the rank order potency for inhibition of PAH and urate uptake by various organic anions, led the authors to suggest that in the pig kidney, urate and PAH uptakes occur via similar but separate transporters (Werner and Roch-Ramel, 1991). Whether the differences in PAH and losartan transport observed in the present study represent interaction with different transporters or simply kinetic differences awaits further investigation.

As a class, the angiotensin II receptor antagonists have high affinity for organic anion transport in the kidney. For example, losartan is 7- to 10-fold more potent than probenecid in inhibiting urate uptake in rat and human brush border membranes (Edwards et al., 1996; Roch-Ramel et al., 1997) and is uricosuric in humans (Nakashima et al., 1992; Tsunoda et al., 1993). In the present study, losartan, eprosartan, and irbesartan inhibited PAH transport with a potency similar to published values for probenecid (~15 µM; Dantzler et al., 1995), whereas valsartan was approximately 5-fold more potent than probenecid. The high affinity of this class of compounds for the organic anion secretory pathway, if confirmed in humans, suggests that these compounds may interfere with the renal excretion of other anionic drugs. However, at the present time, we are not aware of any such reports.

    Acknowledgments

We thank Sue Tirri for administrative assistance.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 27, 1999.

Received for publication December 22, 1998.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Richard Edwards, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Department of Renal Pharmacology, UW2521, 709 Swedeland Road, Box 1539, King of Prussia, PA 19406. E-mail: Richard_M_Edwards{at}sbphrd.com

    Abbreviations

PAH, para-aminohippurate; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; JPAH, secretory flux of PAH; JLOS, secretory flux of losartan; alpha -KG, alpha -ketoglutarate.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/99/2901-0038$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. H. Wright and W. H. Dantzler
Molecular and Cellular Physiology of Renal Organic Cation and Anion Transport
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 987 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
G. Hill, T. Cihlar, C. Oo, E. S. Ho, K. Prior, H. Wiltshire, J. Barrett, B. Liu, and P. Ward
The Anti-Influenza Drug Oseltamivir Exhibits Low Potential to Induce Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions via Renal Secretion---Correlation of in Vivo and in Vitro Studies
Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 13 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. S. Mulato, E. S. Ho, and T. Cihlar
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Efficiently Reduce the Transport and Cytotoxicity of Adefovir Mediated by the Human Renal Organic Anion Transporter 1
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 10 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Trizna, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Trizna, W.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition