From the Departments of Medicine (M.E.G.),
Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology (W.H., P.S., F.H.L., V.G.), and
Obstetrics and
Gynecology (P.D.P.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
 |
Introduction |
-receptors
are defined as nonopiate, nondopaminergic, and nonphencyclidine binding
sites that interact with several psychoactive agents including
benzomorphans, haloperidol, and phencyclidine (Walker et al., 1990
;
Ferris et al., 1991
; Su, 1991
). These binding sites are, however,
heterogeneous, consisting of several subtypes that can be
differentiated by pharmacological and biochemical characteristics. One
of these subtypes, namely
-R1, has recently been cloned from
guinea pig liver (Hanner et al., 1996
). Subsequently, we have cloned
the human (Kekuda et al., 1996
), rat (Seth et al., 1998
), and mouse
(Seth et al., 1997
) homologs of the receptor and also deduced the
structure, exon-intron organization, and chromosomal location of the
human (Prasad et al., 1998
) and murine (Seth et al., 1997
) gene coding
for the receptor. Interest in
-receptors in immune cells stems from
the findings that
-specific ligands have profound effects on immune
function.
-receptor ligands induce inhibition of proliferative
response to mitogens on lymphocytes both in vivo and in vitro (Carr et
al., 1992
; Casellas et al., 1994
). Furthermore, Liu et al. (1995)
,
using a large number of
ligands, have shown that a high degree of
correlation exists between drug binding potency at
-receptors and
the ability of these drugs to modulate splenocyte proliferation. The
ability of several
ligands to inhibit mitogen-induced human T
lymphocyte proliferation in vitro is comparable to that of cyclosporin
A (Casellas et al., 1994
). Studies on the cellular mechanism of
ligand-induced immunosuppression have shown that these ligands interfere with the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6,
and TNF-
(Derocq et al., 1995
) and also inhibit experimental acute
graft-versus-host disease by blocking the production of IFN-
by Th1
CD4+ T cells (Carayon et al., 1995
). These
effects that the
ligands have on the function of immune cells are
similar to those of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, which is
produced by Th2 CD4+ T cells and macrophages.
Recent studies have in fact demonstrated that
ligands enhance the
production of endotoxin-induced IL-10 in vivo (Bourrie et al., 1995
).
Taken collectively, these studies provide strong evidence for an
important role of
-receptors in the function of immune cells,
especially lymphocytes.
The presence of
-receptors in immune cells was first reported by Su
et al. (1988)
in guinea pig spleen and by Wolfe et al. (1988)
in human
peripheral blood leukocytes. Subsequently, T-enriched lymphocytes and
B-enriched lymphocytes isolated from mouse spleen were used to
characterize these receptors (Carr et al., 1991
; Garza et al., 1993
).
Even though all of these studies have unequivocally demonstrated the
presence of
-receptors in immune cells, the biochemical and
pharmacological profiles of these receptors differ markedly, indicating
species- and cell type-dependent differential expression of various
subtypes of
-receptors in immune cells. Because the
-receptor
subtypes exhibit profound differences in affinity and selectivity
toward
ligands, including the putative endogenous ligands such as
progesterone, molecular identification of the receptor subtypes that
are expressed in different cell types of the immune system is needed to
further our current understanding of the role of
ligands and
-receptors in immune function. The present investigation was
undertaken to characterize, using pharmacological and molecular
biological approaches, the
-receptor that is expressed in the Jurkat
cell, a human T cell line. This cell line is CD4-positive and has the
ability to produce IL-2 and IFN-
in response to stimuli, a
characteristic of Th1 CD4+ T cells (Mohagheghpour
et al., 1984
). The results of this investigation show that Jurkat cells
functionally express the
-R1 subtype. In addition, we have
demonstrated in this investigation that
-R1 cDNA cloned from the
Jurkat cells can be functionally expressed in an heterologous system,
and we have obtained direct evidence that the cloned receptor interacts
with progesterone, a putative endogenous ligand with well documented
immunomodulating properties. We have also obtained evidence for the
existence of an alternatively spliced form of
-R1, which exhibits
markedly reduced ligand binding capacity.
 |
Experimental Procedures |
Materials.
[3H]Haloperidol (sp. radioactivity, 15 Ci/mmol), [ring-1,3-3H]-(+)-pentazocine (sp.
radioactivity, 31.4 Ci/mmol),
[3H]-(+)-1-propyl-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine
[(+)-PPP; sp. radioactivity, 92.4 Ci/mmol], and
[1,2-3H]progesterone (sp. radioactivity,
47.5 Ci/mmol) were purchased from DuPont-NEN (Boston, MA). The
unlabeled
ligands haloperidol, (+)-pentazocine, (+)-PPP,
1,3-di(2-tolyl) guanidine (DTG), clorgyline, dextromethorphan,
spiperone, (+)-allylnormetazocine,
(
)-N-(3-phenyl-1-propyl)-1-phenyl-2-aminopropane [(
)-PPAP], and carbetapentane were purchased from Research
Biochemicals, Inc. (Natick, MA). The cell lines Jurkat (clone E6-1),
HeLa, and JAR cells were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (Rockville, MD). MCF-7 cells were kindly given by Dr. J.A.
Moscow (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Cell culture media were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD) and fetal
bovine serum was obtained from Atlanta Biologicals (Atlanta, GA).
Culture of Jurkat Cells and Preparation of Cell Membranes.
Jurkat cells were grown in 225-cm2 culture
flasks, using Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were collected by centrifugation and
suspended in 5 mM
K2HPO4/KH2PO4
buffer (pH 7.5). The suspension was homogenized using the Ultra-Turrax
Tissuemizer (Tekmar Company, Cincinnati, OH). The resulting
homogenate was centrifuged at 60,000g for 30 min, and the
membrane pellets were suspended in 5 mM
K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5) at a protein concentration of 5 mg/ml. The membrane suspensions were stored in small aliquots in liquid nitrogen until use.
HeLa, JAR, and MCF-7 cells were cultured as previously described (Kekuda et al., 1996
; Seth et al., 1997
, 1998
).
Binding Assays.
Binding of different radiolabeled ligands to
Jurkat cell membranes was measured as described previously (Ramamoorthy
et al., 1995
). Membranes (250 µg protein) were incubated with ligands in 200 µl of 5 mM
K2HPO4/KH2PO4
buffer (pH 7.5) for 3 h at room temperature. Binding was
terminated by the addition of ice-cold binding buffer, followed by
rapid filtration of the mixture on a Whatman GF/F glass fiber filter
(pore size, 0.7 µm) that had been presoaked in 0.3%
polyethyleneimine. The filter was washed three times with 5 ml of
ice-cold binding buffer. Radioactivity associated with the filter was
determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Nonspecific binding
was determined under similar conditions, but in the presence of 10 µM
unlabeled haloperidol. This value was subtracted from total binding to
calculate specific binding. Nonspecific binding was less than 15% of
total binding at saturating concentrations of haloperidol. Use of 10 µM clorgyline or carbetapentane instead of unlabeled haloperidol
yielded similar values for nonspecific binding. Stock solutions of
competitive inhibitors were prepared either in dimethyl sulfoxide
(haloperidol, DTG, (
)-PPAP, and spiperone) or in binding buffer. When
stock solutions made in dimethyl sulfoxide were used, an equal
concentration (final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide during binding
assay was 1%) of the solvent was included in the assays to provide
appropriate controls.
Northern Blot Analysis.
Poly(A)+ RNA
was isolated from Jurkat and JAR cells using the FastTrack mRNA
isolation kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). The human
-R1 (h
-R1)
cDNA (Kekuda et al., 1996
) was radiolabeled with
[
-32P]-dCTP by random priming using the
Ready-to-go oligo-labeling kit (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ).
Poly(A)+ RNA samples were size-fractionated on a
denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gel and probed with
[32P]cDNA under high-stringency conditions
(Kekuda et al., 1996
).
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and
Subcloning and Sequencing of RT-PCR Products.
RT-PCR using
poly(A)+ RNA isolated from Jurkat cells was done
with
-R1-specific primers. The upstream (sense) primer was
5'-CGTCCTCGAGCCGGCTCCCTCCT-3', which corresponds to
nucleotide positions 5 to 17 of the h
-R1 cDNA and contains an added
nucleotide sequence (underlined) to introduce an XhoI site.
The downstream (antisense) primer was 5'-CCCGCTCTAGACCATCCGCAGGT-3', which corresponds to
nucleotide positions 740 to 762 of the h
-R1 cDNA. Nucleotide
substitutions were present in this primer in three places, nucleotides
752, 754, and 755, to introduce an XbaI site (underlined).
These restriction sites were introduced for directional cloning of the
RT-PCR products in pBluescript vector under the control of T7 promoter.
These two primers encompass the complete protein-coding region of the h
-R1 cDNA (nucleotide positions 48 to 719 with the termination codon). The RT-PCR products were genecleaned and, after digestion with
XhoI and XbaI, were ligated into pBluescript for
nucleotide sequencing and functional expression. Sequencing was done
using an automated DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Instruments, Eden Prairie, MN).
Vaccinia Virus Expression and Measurement of
-Receptor Ligand
Binding.
This was done using the procedure described previously
(Kekuda et al., 1996
; Seth et al., 1997
, 1998
). HeLa and MCF-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Subconfluent cultures grown in 24-well culture
plates were first infected with a recombinant vaccinia virus VTF 7-3, which carries the gene for T7 RNA polymerase as a part of its genome.
This enables HeLa and MCF-7 cells to express T7 RNA polymerase. After
the infection, the cells were transfected with either pBluescript vector alone or pBluescript-cDNA construct. In the constructs, the cDNA
inserts were present in such an orientation that the transcription of
the cDNAs was under the control of T7 promoter present in the vector.
Transfection was mediated by lipofection. The virus-encoded T7 RNA
polymerase catalyzes the transcription of the cDNA inserts in the
constructs, allowing transient expression of the cDNA-encoded proteins
in the cells. After 10 to 12 h after transfection, the medium from
each well was removed and replaced with 300 µl of 5 mM
K2HPO4/KH2PO4
buffer (pH 7.5). The culture plate was kept at
80°C for 2 h to
freeze the cells. The frozen cells were then thawed and homogenized by
passing through a 25-gauge needle several times. The homogenate was
used in ligand binding assays. The procedure for binding assays was
similar to that described previously for Jurkat cell membranes, except
that the final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide in the assay mixture
was kept at 2% in experiments dealing with progesterone binding. This
was necessary to keep the steroid in solution.
Data Analysis.
The kinetic parameters of equilibrium
binding, namely Kd (apparent
dissociation constant) and Bmax
(maximal binding capacity) were calculated by linear as well as
nonlinear regression methods using the Fig. P (version 6.0) computer
program (BioSoft, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Inhibition constants
(Ki) were calculated from the
IC50 values (i.e., the concentration of unlabeled
test compound that was needed to cause 50% inhibition of the specific
binding of radiolabeled ligand) according to the method of Cheng and
Prusoff (1973)
. Experiments were performed in triplicate and
each experiment was repeated two or three times. Data are presented as
means ± S.E. (n = 6-9).
 |
Results |
Characteristics of [3H]haloperidol Binding to Jurkat
Cell Membranes.
To characterize the
binding sites in the
Jurkat cell line, we first used [3H]haloperidol
as the ligand. Haloperidol is a high-affinity ligand to both type 1 and
type 2
-receptors (Walker et al., 1990
; Ferris et al., 1991
; Su,
1991
). The binding assays were done using Jurkat cell membranes in the
presence of [3H]haloperidol (10 nM) alone to
determine the total binding, and in the presence of
[3H]haloperidol (10 nM) and unlabeled
haloperidol (10 µM) to determine the nonspecific binding. The total
binding increased with time and the binding was approximately at
equilibrium between 2 and 6 h of incubation. The nonspecific
binding did not show time-dependent increase and this component was
always found to be ~15% of total binding under equilibrium binding conditions.
The specific binding of [3H]haloperidol to
Jurkat cell membranes was saturable over a concentration range of 0.5 to 10 nM (Fig. 1A). Compared with total
binding, nonspecific binding was ~25% at 0.5 nM haloperidol and
~15% at 10 nM haloperidol. Scatchard analysis of the data for
specific binding showed the presence of a single binding site (Fig.
1B). Kd was 3.9 ± 0.3 nM and
Bmax was 1.00 ± 0.05 pmol/mg of membrane protein.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Saturation kinetics of [3H]haloperidol
binding to Jurkat cell membranes. Binding assays were done by
incubating Jurkat cell membranes (250 µg protein) with 0.5 to 10 nM
[3H]haloperidol for 2.5 h. Nonspecific binding was
determined under identical assay conditions but in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled haloperidol. A, total binding ( ) and nonspecific
binding ( ) at varying concentrations of
[3H]haloperidol. B, Scatchard plot, describing the
relationship between specific binding and specific binding/free
haloperidol concentration.
|
|
The binding of [3H]haloperidol to Jurkat cell
membranes was inhibited by several
ligands with high potency (Fig.
2). The dose-response relationship for
the inhibition was monophasic for all ligands tested, adding credence
to the conclusion from the saturation kinetics that haloperidol binds
to a single site in the membranes. The IC50 and
Ki values for the ligands to inhibit [3H]haloperidol binding are given in Table
1. The
Ki value for haloperidol (3.7 ± 0.6 nM) was close to the Kd value
(3.9 ± 0.3 nM) determined from Scatchard analysis, again
indicating the homogeneity of the binding site. Clorgyline, (
)-PPAP,
carbetapentane, (+)-PPP, and DTG were found to be very potent
inhibitors of [3H]haloperidol binding
(Ki
100 nM). Dextromethorphan and
(+)-allylnormetazocine exhibited Ki
values in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 µM. Spiperone, also a
D2 receptor antagonist, inhibited the binding of
[3H]haloperidol with a
Ki value of ~0.35 µM. The
relatively low potency of spiperone indicates that the binding of
[3H]haloperidol observed in Jurkat cell
membranes is not due to binding to the D2
receptor. Dextromethorphan and (+)-allylnormetazocine are highly
specific for
binding sites, but they interact with the site with a
much lower affinity when compared to other
ligands such as
haloperidol, clorgyline, (
)-PPAP, and carbetapentane.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Dose-response relationship for the inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding to Jurkat cell membranes by
various ligands. Binding assays were done by incubating Jurkat cell
membranes (250 µg protein) with 10 nM [3H]haloperidol
in the presence of increasing concentrations of various ligands.
The control binding measured in the absence of inhibitors was taken as
100% which was 0.96 ± 0.02 pmol/mg of protein. , haloperidol;
, clorgyline; , ( )-PPAP; , carbetapentane; , (+)-PPP;
, DTG; , (+)-allylnormetazocine; , spiperone; ,
dextromethorphan.
|
|
Molecular Identity of the
Binding Site in Jurkat Cells.
The
-R1 has been cloned from several animal species (Hanner et al.,
1996
; Kekuda et al., 1996
; Seth et al., 1997
, 1998
). In humans, the
size of the
-R1 mRNA is about 1.7 kb (Kekuda et al., 1996
; Prasad et
al., 1998
). We investigated, using molecular biological approaches,
whether the
-R1 is expressed in Jurkat cells. We first carried out
Northern blot hybridization of size-fractionated poly(A)+ RNA isolated from Jurkat cells with the
h
-R1 cDNA as the probe. Poly(A)+RNA from JAR
human placental choriocarcinoma cell line was used as a positive
control because the h
-R1 cDNA was isolated from a JAR cell cDNA
library. As shown in Fig. 3, Jurkat cells
as well as JAR cells contain a 1.7-kb mRNA species that specifically
hybridizes to the h
-R1 cDNA probe.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA
from Jurkat cells and JAR cells using h -R1 cDNA as the probe.
|
|
To provide unequivocal evidence for the presence of the
-R1 in
Jurkat cells, RT-PCR was carried out with Jurkat cell mRNA using
h
-R1 cDNA-specific primers. The primers encompassed the entire
coding region of the h
-R1 cDNA. The RT-PCR yielded a product of
expected size. The product was subcloned into pSPORT vector for
sequencing and functional expression. Introduction of XbaI and XhoI sites in the primers made it possible to clone the
RT-PCR products unidirectionally; the cDNA inserts in the resultant
constructs were under the control of T7 promoter. Subcloning of the
RT-PCR products obtained with Jurkat cell mRNA yielded two distinct
clones, clone A and clone B. These two cDNAs were sequenced. Clone A
was exactly identical with the h
-R1 cDNA that was cloned previously from the JAR cell line. It contained an open reading frame, coding for
a protein of 223 amino acids. Clone B was highly homologous to clone A
except that it contained a deletion of 93 bp in the coding region and,
in addition, had nucleotide substitutions in three places, resulting in
three amino acid substitutions. Clone B, however, contained an open
reading frame, coding for a protein of 192 amino acids. Apparently, the
size difference between the two RT-PCR products was not large enough to
be detected under the conditions used to visualize the size of the
RT-PCR products with ethidium bromide. An alignment of the amino acid
sequences of clone A and clone B is shown in Fig.
4A. The protein coded by clone B differed
from the protein coded by clone A in three places: Ala-13, Leu-28, and
Ala-86 in clone A were replaced by Thr-13, Pro-28, and Val-86,
respectively, in clone B. The 93-bp deletion in clone B resulted in the
deletion of 31 amino acids, corresponding to the amino acid position
119-149 in h
-R1 protein.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, comparison of amino acid sequence of the RT-PCR
products obtained from Jurkat cell mRNA (clone A and clone B). B,
generation of -R1 and -R1A by alternative splicing.
|
|
The human gene for the
-R1 has already been characterized (Prasad et
al., 1998
). It is located on chromosome 9 and it consists of four
exons. The third exon is 93 bp long. The 93 bp that was deleted in
clone B corresponds to this exon. Therefore, clone B represents an
alternatively spliced
-R1. The generation of the alternatively
spliced
-R1 (
-R1A) is schematically described in Fig. 4B.
Interestingly, clone B also contained three nucleotide substitutions in
addition to the deletion of the third exon. This indicates that clone A
and clone B did not originate from the same chromosome 9.
Ligand-Binding Characterization of the Jurkat Cell
-R1 and
-R1A cDNAs.
The
-R1 cDNA (clone A) was expressed in HeLa
cells using the vaccinia virus expression technique. The ligand-binding
function of the cDNA was assessed by comparing
[3H]haloperidol binding to cell membranes
between HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector and HeLa cells
transfected with pSPORT-
-R1 cDNA construct (Fig.
5).
[3H]Haloperidol binding was 2 to 3 times higher
in cDNA-transfected cells than in vector-transfected cells,
demonstrating that the Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA is functionally active
in terms of
ligand binding.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time course of [3H]haloperidol binding
to membranes derived from HeLa cells transfected with empty vector
( ), -R1 cDNA ( ), or -R1A cDNA ( ). The cDNAs were
expressed in HeLa cells by vaccinia virus expression system. Cells
transfected with empty vector served as control. Binding assays were
done with cell homogenates using 5 nM [3H]haloperidol.
|
|
Because clone B contained three amino acid substitutions as well as
deletion of exon 3, resulting in the removal of 31 amino acids, we
constructed two chimeras between clone A and clone B such that one
chimera contained the three amino acid substitutions but no deletion
(chimera 1), whereas the other chimera had the deletion of 31 amino
acids but not the three amino acid substitutions (chimera 2).
Construction of these chimeras was facilitated because of the presence
of a single StyI site in clone A and in clone B between the
region containing the three amino acid substitutions and the region
containing the deletion. Because both clones were ligated in pSPORT
vector at an XhoI site at the 5' end and at an
XbaI at the 3' end, the XhoI/StyI and
XbaI/StyI fragments of the two clones could be
exchanged easily to generate the chimeras. Expression of chimera l in
HeLa cells indicated that it was able to bind
[3H]haloperidol, although to a much lesser
extent (~60%) compared to clone A (data not shown). This shows that
the three amino acid substitutions interfere to some extent with the
ability of the protein to bind [3H]haloperidol.
However, chimera 2, which contained the deletion of 31 amino acids, was
devoid of
ligand-binding activity. The binding of
[3H]haloperidol in HeLa cells transfected with
chimera 2 was not significantly different from the binding in
vector-transfected control cells (Fig. 5). Thus, the alternatively
spliced
-R1A, lacking the third exon, is nonfunctional in terms of
ligand binding. This was confirmed with two additional
ligands,
[3H]-(+)-PPP and
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine.
-R1 cDNA increased the
binding of these ligands in HeLa cells, whereas
-R1A cDNA failed to
do so (Fig. 6).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Binding of [3H]-(+)-PPP and
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine to membranes derived from HeLa cells
transfected with empty vector (pSPORT), -R1 cDNA, or -R1A cDNA.
The cDNAs were expressed using the vaccinia virus expression technique.
Binding assays were done with cell homogenates using an incubation
period of 2.5 h (equilibrium binding) and 5 nM ligand
concentration.
|
|
Because HeLa cells, which were used here to express heterologously the
-R1 and
-R1A cDNAs cloned from the Jurkat cells, possess
endogenous
-R1 activity, it can be argued that the binding data
obtained from the cDNA-transfected HeLa cells are possibly due to
changes in the expression of the endogenous receptor after the cDNA
transfection. To address this issue, we used MCF-7 cells (a human
breast cancer cell line) for heterologous expression of the cDNAs.
MCF-7 cells do not express
-R1 activity (Vilner et al., 1995
). There
is no detectable saturable binding of (+)-pentazocine, a type
1-specific
ligand, in these cells (Vilner et al., 1995
; Seth et
al., 1998
). Furthermore, Northern blot analysis has shown that MCF-7
cells do not contain mRNA that is hybridizable to the
-R1 cDNA (Seth
et al., 1998
). Therefore, we expressed the Jurkat cell
-R1 and
-R1A cDNAs in MCF-7 cells and assessed their ligand-binding function
using [3H]-(+)-pentazocine as the ligand (Table
2). Haloperidol-inhibitable [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding was negligible in
pSPORT-transfected MCF-7 cells, confirming the earlier studies (Vilner
et al., 1995
; Seth et al., 1998
). In contrast,
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding in
-R1
cDNA-transfected MCF-7 cells increased 2.5-fold compared with
pSPORT-transfected cells; this increased binding was completely
inhibitable by haloperidol. These results show that the Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA is functional in terms of binding to
ligands in MCF-7
cells, which lack endogenous
-R1. Therefore, the binding of
ligands induced by the cDNA in HeLa cells was not due to changes in
endogenous
-receptor activity. When we performed similar experiments
with
-R1A cDNA, there was no detectable increase in
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding in MCF-7 cells
after transfection with the cDNA, confirming that the cDNA is
nonfunctional with respect to
ligand binding.
The Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA is identical with the JAR cell
-R1 cDNA
cloned previously from our laboratory (Kekuda et al., 1996
). To our
knowledge, the JAR cell
-R1 is the only h
-R1 cloned thus far.
However, our initial report on the JAR cell
-R1 focused primarily on
the cloning and structural elucidation of the receptor (Kekuda et al.,
1996
). Very little is known in terms of the ligand-binding function of
this h
-R1 cDNA except that, when expressed in HeLa cells, it induces
[3H]haloperidol binding and that the
cDNA-induced [3H]haloperidol binding is
inhibitable by various
-receptor-specific ligands. Therefore, in the
present study, we investigated the ligand-binding function of the
h
-R1 in a greater detail using the Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA. Figure
7 describes the saturation kinetics of
[3H]haloperidol binding in control HeLa cells
and in HeLa cells expressing the cDNA. The binding is saturable in
control HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector, indicating the
presence of endogenous
-receptor activity in these cells. We have
shown previously that HeLa cells possess mRNA that hybridizes to
h
-R1 cDNA under high stringency conditions (Seth et al., 1998
),
suggesting that these cells express
-R1 constitutively. The kinetic
parameters, Kd and
Bmax, for the endogenous
[3H]haloperidol binding activity, were 1.5 ± 0.3 nM and 2.6 ± 0.4 pmol/mg protein. The binding increased
more than 2-fold in HeLa cells transfected with the Jurkat
-R1 cDNA.
The binding was saturable in cDNA-transfected cells and
Kd and
Bmax were 1.7 ± 0.2 nM and 6.8 ± 0.6 pmol/mg protein.
Kdwas almost the same in
control cells and in cDNA-transfected cells, but
Bmax in cDNA-transfected cells was
2.6-fold higher than in control cells, indicating that expression of
the Jurkat
-R1 cDNA in HeLa cells results in an increase in the
receptor density with no apparent change in the binding affinity. The
cDNA-specific binding data were also analyzed separately. Kd and
Bmax for the cDNA-specific binding
were 1.9 ± 0.3 nM and 4.2± 0.4 pmol/mg protein.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Saturation kinetics of [3H]haloperidol
binding to membranes derived from HeLa cells transfected with empty
pSPORT vector ( ) or -R1 cDNA ( ). The cDNA was expressed by the
vaccinia virus expression technique. Binding assays were done with cell
homogenates using [3H]haloperidol in the concentration
range of 0.1 to 5 nM. Results are given as Scatchard plots describing
the relationship between ligand binding (B) and ligand binding/free
ligand concentration (B/F). Inset: Data for -R1 cDNA-specific
binding, which were obtained by subtracting the binding in empty
vector-transfected cells from the binding in -R1 cDNA-transfected
cells. B is given in pmol/106 cells and F is given in nM.
|
|
Interaction of Progesterone with the Cloned Jurkat
-R1.
Progesterone is believed to be an endogenous ligand to
-R1. However,
the direct binding of this steroid has not been demonstrated with any
of the cloned
-R1 (guinea pig, rat, mouse, or human). Therefore, we
investigated the binding of progesterone to Jurkat cell
-R1 using
HeLa cells expressing the Jurkat
-R1 cDNA. We first measured the
binding of [3H]progesterone in control HeLa
cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector and in HeLa cells
transfected with the Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA (Table
3). There was almost a 2-fold increase in
the binding in cDNA-transfected cells compared with control cells. The
cDNA-specific [3H]progesterone binding was
inhibited >90% by the
ligands haloperidol, clorgyline,
carbetapentane, and (+)-PPP, indicating that the observed increase is
due to specific binding to the cDNA-encoded
-receptor. R5020 is a
progesterone analog that is an inhibitor of progesterone binding to the
progesterone receptor. This compound did not inhibit [3H]progesterone binding in HeLa cells induced
by the cDNA. This rules out the participation of the classical
progesterone receptor in the observed increase in
[3H]progesterone binding in cDNA-transfected
cells.
Fig. 8 describes the kinetics of the
cDNA-specific progesterone binding. The binding was saturable and
Scatchard analysis of the binding data showed that
Kd is 88 ± 7 nM and
Bmax is 4.6 ± 0.2 pmol/mg of
protein. We also evaluated the kinetic nature of the inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone in
control HeLa cells and in cDNA-transfected cells (Fig.
9). In control cells transfected with
empty pSPORT vector, progesterone competed with
[3H]haloperidol for the binding site.
Progesterone (200 nM) increased the Kd
for [3H]haloperidol binding from 1.7 ± 0.5 nM to 6.5 ± 1.6 nM. Bmax was
not altered significantly (2.2 ± 0.3)
pmol/106 cells in the absence of progesterone
versus 2.8 ± 0.5 pmol/106 cells in the
presence of progesterone). In HeLa cells expressing the Jurkat cell
-R1 cDNA, the binding of [3H]haloperidol was
increased about 2.5-fold. Again, the inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone was
competitive. The Kd value, which was
1.2 ± 0.2 nM in the absence of progesterone, increased to
3.9 ± 0.4 nM in the presence of progesterone. The Bmax value remained the same (5.7 ± 0.4 versus 5.7 ± 0.3 pmol/106 cells).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Saturation kinetics of [3H]progesterone
binding induced by -R1 cDNA. HeLa cells were transfected with either
empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT- -R1 cDNA. Vaccinia virus expression
technique was used to express the cDNA functionally. Cell homogenates
were used for [3H]progesterone binding at varying
concentrations of progesterone in the range of 10 to 250 nM. The
cDNA-specific binding, which was obtained by subtracting the binding in
empty vector-transfected cells from the binding in cDNA-transfected
cells, was used for data analysis. Inset: Scatchard plot describing the
relationship between progesterone binding (B) and progesterone
binding/progesterone concentration (B/l).
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Kinetics of inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone in control HeLa
cells transfected with empty vector (A) and in HeLa cells transfected
with -R1 cDNA (B). Vaccinia virus expression technique was used to
express the cDNA functionally. Haloperidol binding to cell homogenates
was measured with varying concentrations of
[3H]haloperidol in the range of 0.5 to 7.5 nM in the
absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 200 nM progesterone. Data are given
as Scatchard plots, describing the relationship between haloperidol
binding and haloperidol binding/free haloperidol concentration. Values
for binding are given in pmol/106 cells and values for free
haloperidol concentration are given in nM.
|
|
(+)-Pentazocine is a specific high-affinity ligand and progesterone is
a putative endogenous ligand for
-R1. Therefore, we analyzed the
inhibition of
-R1 cDNA-specific
[3H]haloperidol binding by these two ligands
(Fig. 10). With the concentration of
[3H]haloperidol at 3 nM, (+)-pentazocine and
progesterone inhibited the binding with IC50
values of 57 ± 8 nM and 279 ± 21 nM, respectively. The
corresponding Ki values were 19 ± 3 nM and 93 ± 7 nM. Thus, (+)-pentazocine interacts with the
cloned
-R1 with high affinity. The
Ki value calculated for progesterone
is similar to the Kd value (88 ± 7 nM) determined directly from the binding of
[3H]progesterone to the cloned receptor. We
also analyzed the saturation kinetics of (+)-pentazocine binding to the
cloned
-R1 (Fig. 11A). The binding
was saturable with a Kd of 12 ± 2 nM and a Bmax of 3.7 ± 0.3 pmol/106 cells. The binding of
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine (3 nM) to the cloned
receptor was inhibitable by progesterone with an
IC50 value of 69 ± 19 nM (Fig. 11B). The corresponding Ki value (55 ± 15 nM) is comparable to the Ki value calculated for the inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding (93 ± 7 nM) and
the Kd value calculated directly from
binding of progesterone (88 ± 7 nM).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Dose-response relationship for the inhibition of
[3H]haloperidol binding to the cloned -R1 by
(+)-pentazocine ( ) and progesterone ( ). HeLa cells were
transfected with either empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT- -R1 cDNA.
Vaccinia virus expression technique was used to express the cDNA
functionally. Cell homogenates were used for the binding of
[3H]haloperidol (3 nM) in the presence of increasing
concentrations of (+)-pentazocine and progesterone. The cDNA-specific
binding, which was obtained by subtracting the binding in empty
vector-transfected cells from the binding in cDNA-transfected cells,
was used for data analysis. The results are given as a percentage of
control binding measured in the absence of (+)-pentazocine and
progesterone.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Saturation kinetics of
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding (A) and inhibition of
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding by progesterone (B). Binding
measurements were made in cell homogenates derived from HeLa cells
transfected with either empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT- -R1 cDNA. Only
the cDNA-specific binding was used for data analysis. Saturation
binding was analyzed over a (+)-pentazocine concentration of 3 to 100 nM (A). In inhibition studies with progesterone, the concentration of
[3H]-(+)-pentazocine was 3 nM.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
There is increasing evidence that suggests potent immunomodulatory
effects of
-receptor ligands (Carr et al., 1992
; Casellas et al.,
1994
; Liu et al., 1995
; Derocq et al., 1995
; Carayon et al., 1995
;
Bourrie et al., 1995
). Because some of these ligands have been shown to
elevate the circulating levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines and at
the same time to suppress the circulating levels of proinflammatory
cytokines,
ligands may prove to be potentially useful therapeutic
agents in the treatment of various immune disorders.
-receptors,
which are the targets for these ligands, have thus far been studied in
immune cells only by ligand binding assays to characterize the
pharmacological profiles of these receptors (Su et al., 1988
; Wolfe et
al., 1988
; Carr et al., 1991
; Garza et al., 1993
). Very little is known
about the molecular nature of these receptors. The present
investigation was undertaken to study the
-receptors in immune cells
at molecular level.
We have established in this investigation that Jurkat cells express the
recently cloned
-R1. This was done by Northern analysis and RT-PCR,
which unequivocally showed the presence of
-R1 mRNA in these cells.
The RT-PCR yielded a functionally active
-R1 cDNA as assessed by
binding of
ligands. Using this cDNA, we have now investigated the
ligand-binding characteristics of the h
-R1 for the first time by
using heterologous expression systems. These studies have shown that
the
-R1 cDNA, cloned from the Jurkat cells, induces
ligand
binding activity when expressed in HeLa cells and MCF-7 cells. HeLa
cells are known to possess endogenous
-R1 activity, whereas MCF-7
cells lack
-R1 activity. The fact that the
-R1 cDNA can be
functionally expressed in both of these cells indicates that the
cDNA-induced
ligand binding activity is unrelated to the endogenous
-R1. The cDNA-induced ligand binding was demonstrated with more than
one ligand: haloperidol, (+)-PPP, and (+)-pentazocine.
Haloperidol can interact with several subtypes of
-receptors,
whereas (+)-pentazocine is believed to be a specific ligand for the
-R1. This suggests that the cDNA cloned from the Jurkat cells codes
for the
-R1. When functionally assessed in HeLa cells, the cDNA
induces a single saturable binding site that exhibits
Kd values of 1.9 ± 0.3 nM for
haloperidol and 12 ± 2 nM for (+)-pentazocine. When assessed in
native Jurkat cell membranes, haloperidol was found to bind to a single
saturable binding site with a Kd of
3.9 ± 0.3 nM. Thus, the affinity for haloperidol for the native
Jurkat cell binding site and for the cDNA-induced binding site was comparable.
The time course of [3H]haloperidol binding to
either native Jurkat cell membranes or HeLa cell membranes expressing
the cloned
-R1 showed that the binding reached equilibrium only with
incubation periods of >2 h. Similar observations were made when
haloperidol binding to human placental brush-border membranes was
studied (Ramamoorthy et al., 1995
). A survey of the literature on the binding of haloperidol to membrane preparations shows that a 90- to
120-min incubation period has been used in a majority of the studies.
-R1 is membrane-bound and is associated with the plasma membrane as
well as with intracellular membranes. The cloned receptor possesses a
single putative transmembrane domain. The exact membrane topology of
the receptor is not known; neither is the location of the
ligand-binding site. Because membrane preparations exist as
vesicles to a significant extent, the slow reaching of equilibrium binding suggests that the binding site may not be readily accessible to
the ligand in these membrane vesicles. This is, however, only speculative because the exact topology of the ligand-binding site has
not yet been elucidated.
Interaction with progesterone is a characteristic that is unique to the
-R1 because other subtypes of
-receptor do not bind this steroid.
We have shown in this study that the cloned Jurkat cell
-R1 binds
progesterone. This is the first demonstration of the direct interaction
of progesterone with a cloned
-R1. The cDNA-induced progesterone
binding was inhibitable by various
ligands but not by R5020, a
steroid analog that antagonizes the binding of progesterone to the
classical progesterone receptor. We have also shown that progesterone
was a competitive inhibitor of the cDNA-induced haloperidol binding.
The interaction of progesterone with the cloned Jurkat cell
-R1 was
of high affinity as suggested by the
Kd value (~80 nM). Because
progesterone is thought to be an endogenous ligand for the
-R1, the
high-affinity interaction between the cloned
-R1 and the steroid as
demonstrated in this study is physiologically relevant. Progesterone
concentrations in human plasma are in the range of 30 to 40 nM
(Johansson, 1969
), a value that is close to the observed
Kd value. In women, the circulating
levels of progesterone vary dramatically under various physiological
conditions such as menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The levels are known
to be as high as 500 nM in late pregnancy (Johansson, 1969
). It is
therefore likely that, with a Kd value of ~80 nM, the fractional occupancy of the receptor with progesterone fluctuates markedly in women depending on the physiological status. This would mean that the biological effects of progesterone that are
mediated by the interaction of this steroid with the
-R1 may vary in
magnitude in women under different physiological conditions, determined
by the circulating levels of progesterone. Progesterone has been shown
to be active in anti-inflammatory tests (Siiteri et al., 1977
) and a
direct comparison between the relative affinities of various steroids
for the
-R1 and the relative potencies of these steroids in
anti-inflammatory tests has suggested that the immunomodulatory effects
of progesterone are likely to be produced through the
-receptor
(Siiteri et al., 1977
; Su et al., 1988
). These observations are
especially relevant to pregnancy, when the circulating levels of
progesterone are high enough to saturate the
-R1 in immune cells,
because it is possible that the immunosuppressive function of
progesterone may play a significant role in the maternal immunotolerance of the placental allograft.
Another significant aspect of the present study was the
demonstration of the existence of an alternatively spliced form of the
-R1. This receptor variant,
-R1A, arises as a result of deletion
of the third exon. This causes the deletion of 31 amino acids. This
alternatively spliced receptor variant is inactive as assessed by the
binding of haloperidol, (+)-PPP, and (+)-pentazocine. We have
not yet studied the expression of the alternatively spliced variant in
normal tissues. The inactive nature of this variant implies that the
generation of this variant in immune cells is likely to have profound
consequences in immune function. Furthermore, because the
-R1 is
expressed in other tissues as well, especially in the nervous system,
the consequences of the production of the inactive variant would
involve multiple organs. Therefore, the evidence provided in this study
for the occurrence of an inactive splice variant of the
-R1 may have
clinical significance.
Accepted for publication November 23, 1998.
Received for publication May 1, 1998.
(+)-PPP, (+)-1-propyl-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine;
DTG, 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine;
(
)-PPAP, (
)-N-(3-phenyl-1-propyl)-1-phenyl-2-aminopropane;
-R1, type 1
-receptor;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction;
-R1A, alternatively spliced
-R1;
h
-R1, human
-R1.