JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ganapathy, V.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Nucleotide
*Protein*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*HALOPERIDOL
*PENTAZOCINE
*PROGESTERONE

Vol. 289, Issue 1, 251-260, April 1999

Molecular and Ligand-Binding Characterization of the sigma -Receptor in the Jurkat Human T Lymphocyte Cell Line1

Malliga E. Ganapathy, Puttur D. Prasad, Wei Huang, Pankaj Seth, Frederick H. Leibach and Vadivel Ganapathy

From the Departments of Medicine (M.E.G.), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (W.H., P.S., F.H.L., V.G.), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.D.P.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The sigma  binding site present in the Jurkat human T lymphocyte cell line was investigated. Jurkat cell membranes were found to have a single saturable binding site for [3H]haloperidol, a sigma  ligand (dissociation constant, 3.9 ± 0.3 nM). The binding of [3H]haloperidol was inhibited by several sigma  ligands. Northern analysis and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction provided evidence for the expression of the recently cloned type 1 sigma -receptor (sigma -R1) in Jurkat cells. The sigma -R1 cDNA cloned from these cells was functional in heterologous expression systems. When expressed in mammalian cells, the cDNA-induced binding was saturable with dissociation constants of 1.9 ± 0.3 nM for [3H]haloperidol and 12 ± 2 nM for (+)-pentazocine. The binding of [3H]progesterone, a putative endogenous ligand to sigma -R1, to the Jurkat cell sigma -receptor could be directly demonstrated by using heterologously expressed sigma -R1 cDNA. The binding of [3H]progesterone was saturable, with a dissociation constant of 88 ± 7 nM. Progesterone and haloperidol interacted with the receptor competitively. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction also produced evidence for the existence of an alternatively spliced sigma -R1 variant in Jurkat cells. This splice variant was found to be nonfunctional in ligand binding assays. This constitutes the first report on the molecular characterization of the sigma -receptor in immune cells.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

sigma -receptors are defined as nonopiate, nondopaminergic, and nonphencyclidine binding sites that interact with several psychoactive agents including benzomorphans, haloperidol, and phencyclidine (Walker et al., 1990; Ferris et al., 1991; Su, 1991). These binding sites are, however, heterogeneous, consisting of several subtypes that can be differentiated by pharmacological and biochemical characteristics. One of these subtypes, namely sigma -R1, has recently been cloned from guinea pig liver (Hanner et al., 1996). Subsequently, we have cloned the human (Kekuda et al., 1996), rat (Seth et al., 1998), and mouse (Seth et al., 1997) homologs of the receptor and also deduced the structure, exon-intron organization, and chromosomal location of the human (Prasad et al., 1998) and murine (Seth et al., 1997) gene coding for the receptor. Interest in sigma -receptors in immune cells stems from the findings that sigma -specific ligands have profound effects on immune function. sigma -receptor ligands induce inhibition of proliferative response to mitogens on lymphocytes both in vivo and in vitro (Carr et al., 1992; Casellas et al., 1994). Furthermore, Liu et al. (1995), using a large number of sigma  ligands, have shown that a high degree of correlation exists between drug binding potency at sigma -receptors and the ability of these drugs to modulate splenocyte proliferation. The ability of several sigma  ligands to inhibit mitogen-induced human T lymphocyte proliferation in vitro is comparable to that of cyclosporin A (Casellas et al., 1994). Studies on the cellular mechanism of sigma  ligand-induced immunosuppression have shown that these ligands interfere with the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-alpha (Derocq et al., 1995) and also inhibit experimental acute graft-versus-host disease by blocking the production of IFN-gamma by Th1 CD4+ T cells (Carayon et al., 1995). These effects that the sigma  ligands have on the function of immune cells are similar to those of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, which is produced by Th2 CD4+ T cells and macrophages. Recent studies have in fact demonstrated that sigma  ligands enhance the production of endotoxin-induced IL-10 in vivo (Bourrie et al., 1995). Taken collectively, these studies provide strong evidence for an important role of sigma -receptors in the function of immune cells, especially lymphocytes.

The presence of sigma -receptors in immune cells was first reported by Su et al. (1988) in guinea pig spleen and by Wolfe et al. (1988) in human peripheral blood leukocytes. Subsequently, T-enriched lymphocytes and B-enriched lymphocytes isolated from mouse spleen were used to characterize these receptors (Carr et al., 1991; Garza et al., 1993). Even though all of these studies have unequivocally demonstrated the presence of sigma -receptors in immune cells, the biochemical and pharmacological profiles of these receptors differ markedly, indicating species- and cell type-dependent differential expression of various subtypes of sigma -receptors in immune cells. Because the sigma -receptor subtypes exhibit profound differences in affinity and selectivity toward sigma  ligands, including the putative endogenous ligands such as progesterone, molecular identification of the receptor subtypes that are expressed in different cell types of the immune system is needed to further our current understanding of the role of sigma  ligands and sigma -receptors in immune function. The present investigation was undertaken to characterize, using pharmacological and molecular biological approaches, the sigma -receptor that is expressed in the Jurkat cell, a human T cell line. This cell line is CD4-positive and has the ability to produce IL-2 and IFN-gamma in response to stimuli, a characteristic of Th1 CD4+ T cells (Mohagheghpour et al., 1984). The results of this investigation show that Jurkat cells functionally express the sigma -R1 subtype. In addition, we have demonstrated in this investigation that sigma -R1 cDNA cloned from the Jurkat cells can be functionally expressed in an heterologous system, and we have obtained direct evidence that the cloned receptor interacts with progesterone, a putative endogenous ligand with well documented immunomodulating properties. We have also obtained evidence for the existence of an alternatively spliced form of sigma -R1, which exhibits markedly reduced ligand binding capacity.

    Experimental Procedures
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials. [3H]Haloperidol (sp. radioactivity, 15 Ci/mmol), [ring-1,3-3H]-(+)-pentazocine (sp. radioactivity, 31.4 Ci/mmol), [3H]-(+)-1-propyl-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine [(+)-PPP; sp. radioactivity, 92.4 Ci/mmol], and [1,2-3H]progesterone (sp. radioactivity, 47.5 Ci/mmol) were purchased from DuPont-NEN (Boston, MA). The unlabeled sigma  ligands haloperidol, (+)-pentazocine, (+)-PPP, 1,3-di(2-tolyl) guanidine (DTG), clorgyline, dextromethorphan, spiperone, (+)-allylnormetazocine, (-)-N-(3-phenyl-1-propyl)-1-phenyl-2-aminopropane [(-)-PPAP], and carbetapentane were purchased from Research Biochemicals, Inc. (Natick, MA). The cell lines Jurkat (clone E6-1), HeLa, and JAR cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). MCF-7 cells were kindly given by Dr. J.A. Moscow (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Cell culture media were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD) and fetal bovine serum was obtained from Atlanta Biologicals (Atlanta, GA).

Culture of Jurkat Cells and Preparation of Cell Membranes. Jurkat cells were grown in 225-cm2 culture flasks, using Roswell Park Memorial Institute-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. The cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended in 5 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5). The suspension was homogenized using the Ultra-Turrax Tissuemizer (Tekmar Company, Cincinnati, OH). The resulting homogenate was centrifuged at 60,000g for 30 min, and the membrane pellets were suspended in 5 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5) at a protein concentration of 5 mg/ml. The membrane suspensions were stored in small aliquots in liquid nitrogen until use. HeLa, JAR, and MCF-7 cells were cultured as previously described (Kekuda et al., 1996; Seth et al., 1997, 1998).

Binding Assays. Binding of different radiolabeled ligands to Jurkat cell membranes was measured as described previously (Ramamoorthy et al., 1995). Membranes (250 µg protein) were incubated with ligands in 200 µl of 5 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5) for 3 h at room temperature. Binding was terminated by the addition of ice-cold binding buffer, followed by rapid filtration of the mixture on a Whatman GF/F glass fiber filter (pore size, 0.7 µm) that had been presoaked in 0.3% polyethyleneimine. The filter was washed three times with 5 ml of ice-cold binding buffer. Radioactivity associated with the filter was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Nonspecific binding was determined under similar conditions, but in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled haloperidol. This value was subtracted from total binding to calculate specific binding. Nonspecific binding was less than 15% of total binding at saturating concentrations of haloperidol. Use of 10 µM clorgyline or carbetapentane instead of unlabeled haloperidol yielded similar values for nonspecific binding. Stock solutions of competitive inhibitors were prepared either in dimethyl sulfoxide (haloperidol, DTG, (-)-PPAP, and spiperone) or in binding buffer. When stock solutions made in dimethyl sulfoxide were used, an equal concentration (final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide during binding assay was 1%) of the solvent was included in the assays to provide appropriate controls.

Northern Blot Analysis. Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from Jurkat and JAR cells using the FastTrack mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). The human sigma -R1 (hsigma -R1) cDNA (Kekuda et al., 1996) was radiolabeled with [alpha -32P]-dCTP by random priming using the Ready-to-go oligo-labeling kit (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). Poly(A)+ RNA samples were size-fractionated on a denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gel and probed with [32P]cDNA under high-stringency conditions (Kekuda et al., 1996).

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) and Subcloning and Sequencing of RT-PCR Products. RT-PCR using poly(A)+ RNA isolated from Jurkat cells was done with sigma -R1-specific primers. The upstream (sense) primer was 5'-CGTCCTCGAGCCGGCTCCCTCCT-3', which corresponds to nucleotide positions 5 to 17 of the hsigma -R1 cDNA and contains an added nucleotide sequence (underlined) to introduce an XhoI site. The downstream (antisense) primer was 5'-CCCGCTCTAGACCATCCGCAGGT-3', which corresponds to nucleotide positions 740 to 762 of the hsigma -R1 cDNA. Nucleotide substitutions were present in this primer in three places, nucleotides 752, 754, and 755, to introduce an XbaI site (underlined). These restriction sites were introduced for directional cloning of the RT-PCR products in pBluescript vector under the control of T7 promoter. These two primers encompass the complete protein-coding region of the hsigma -R1 cDNA (nucleotide positions 48 to 719 with the termination codon). The RT-PCR products were genecleaned and, after digestion with XhoI and XbaI, were ligated into pBluescript for nucleotide sequencing and functional expression. Sequencing was done using an automated DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Instruments, Eden Prairie, MN).

Vaccinia Virus Expression and Measurement of sigma -Receptor Ligand Binding. This was done using the procedure described previously (Kekuda et al., 1996; Seth et al., 1997, 1998). HeLa and MCF-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Subconfluent cultures grown in 24-well culture plates were first infected with a recombinant vaccinia virus VTF 7-3, which carries the gene for T7 RNA polymerase as a part of its genome. This enables HeLa and MCF-7 cells to express T7 RNA polymerase. After the infection, the cells were transfected with either pBluescript vector alone or pBluescript-cDNA construct. In the constructs, the cDNA inserts were present in such an orientation that the transcription of the cDNAs was under the control of T7 promoter present in the vector. Transfection was mediated by lipofection. The virus-encoded T7 RNA polymerase catalyzes the transcription of the cDNA inserts in the constructs, allowing transient expression of the cDNA-encoded proteins in the cells. After 10 to 12 h after transfection, the medium from each well was removed and replaced with 300 µl of 5 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5). The culture plate was kept at -80°C for 2 h to freeze the cells. The frozen cells were then thawed and homogenized by passing through a 25-gauge needle several times. The homogenate was used in ligand binding assays. The procedure for binding assays was similar to that described previously for Jurkat cell membranes, except that the final concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide in the assay mixture was kept at 2% in experiments dealing with progesterone binding. This was necessary to keep the steroid in solution.

Data Analysis. The kinetic parameters of equilibrium binding, namely Kd (apparent dissociation constant) and Bmax (maximal binding capacity) were calculated by linear as well as nonlinear regression methods using the Fig. P (version 6.0) computer program (BioSoft, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Inhibition constants (Ki) were calculated from the IC50 values (i.e., the concentration of unlabeled test compound that was needed to cause 50% inhibition of the specific binding of radiolabeled ligand) according to the method of Cheng and Prusoff (1973). Experiments were performed in triplicate and each experiment was repeated two or three times. Data are presented as means ± S.E. (n = 6-9).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Characteristics of [3H]haloperidol Binding to Jurkat Cell Membranes. To characterize the sigma  binding sites in the Jurkat cell line, we first used [3H]haloperidol as the ligand. Haloperidol is a high-affinity ligand to both type 1 and type 2 sigma -receptors (Walker et al., 1990; Ferris et al., 1991; Su, 1991). The binding assays were done using Jurkat cell membranes in the presence of [3H]haloperidol (10 nM) alone to determine the total binding, and in the presence of [3H]haloperidol (10 nM) and unlabeled haloperidol (10 µM) to determine the nonspecific binding. The total binding increased with time and the binding was approximately at equilibrium between 2 and 6 h of incubation. The nonspecific binding did not show time-dependent increase and this component was always found to be ~15% of total binding under equilibrium binding conditions.

The specific binding of [3H]haloperidol to Jurkat cell membranes was saturable over a concentration range of 0.5 to 10 nM (Fig. 1A). Compared with total binding, nonspecific binding was ~25% at 0.5 nM haloperidol and ~15% at 10 nM haloperidol. Scatchard analysis of the data for specific binding showed the presence of a single binding site (Fig. 1B). Kd was 3.9 ± 0.3 nM and Bmax was 1.00 ± 0.05 pmol/mg of membrane protein.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Saturation kinetics of [3H]haloperidol binding to Jurkat cell membranes. Binding assays were done by incubating Jurkat cell membranes (250 µg protein) with 0.5 to 10 nM [3H]haloperidol for 2.5 h. Nonspecific binding was determined under identical assay conditions but in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled haloperidol. A, total binding () and nonspecific binding (open circle ) at varying concentrations of [3H]haloperidol. B, Scatchard plot, describing the relationship between specific binding and specific binding/free haloperidol concentration.

The binding of [3H]haloperidol to Jurkat cell membranes was inhibited by several sigma  ligands with high potency (Fig. 2). The dose-response relationship for the inhibition was monophasic for all ligands tested, adding credence to the conclusion from the saturation kinetics that haloperidol binds to a single site in the membranes. The IC50 and Ki values for the ligands to inhibit [3H]haloperidol binding are given in Table 1. The Ki value for haloperidol (3.7 ± 0.6 nM) was close to the Kd value (3.9 ± 0.3 nM) determined from Scatchard analysis, again indicating the homogeneity of the binding site. Clorgyline, (-)-PPAP, carbetapentane, (+)-PPP, and DTG were found to be very potent inhibitors of [3H]haloperidol binding (Ki <=  100 nM). Dextromethorphan and (+)-allylnormetazocine exhibited Ki values in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 µM. Spiperone, also a D2 receptor antagonist, inhibited the binding of [3H]haloperidol with a Ki value of ~0.35 µM. The relatively low potency of spiperone indicates that the binding of [3H]haloperidol observed in Jurkat cell membranes is not due to binding to the D2 receptor. Dextromethorphan and (+)-allylnormetazocine are highly specific for sigma  binding sites, but they interact with the site with a much lower affinity when compared to other sigma  ligands such as haloperidol, clorgyline, (-)-PPAP, and carbetapentane.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Dose-response relationship for the inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding to Jurkat cell membranes by various sigma  ligands. Binding assays were done by incubating Jurkat cell membranes (250 µg protein) with 10 nM [3H]haloperidol in the presence of increasing concentrations of various sigma  ligands. The control binding measured in the absence of inhibitors was taken as 100% which was 0.96 ± 0.02 pmol/mg of protein. open circle , haloperidol; black-down-triangle , clorgyline; star , (-)-PPAP; , carbetapentane; , (+)-PPP; black-square, DTG; down-triangle, (+)-allylnormetazocine; black-triangle, spiperone; triangle , dextromethorphan.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
IC50 and Ki values for various sigma  ligands to inhibit [3H]haloperidol binding to Jurkat cell membranes

Molecular Identity of the sigma  Binding Site in Jurkat Cells. The sigma -R1 has been cloned from several animal species (Hanner et al., 1996; Kekuda et al., 1996; Seth et al., 1997, 1998). In humans, the size of the sigma -R1 mRNA is about 1.7 kb (Kekuda et al., 1996; Prasad et al., 1998). We investigated, using molecular biological approaches, whether the sigma -R1 is expressed in Jurkat cells. We first carried out Northern blot hybridization of size-fractionated poly(A)+ RNA isolated from Jurkat cells with the hsigma -R1 cDNA as the probe. Poly(A)+RNA from JAR human placental choriocarcinoma cell line was used as a positive control because the hsigma -R1 cDNA was isolated from a JAR cell cDNA library. As shown in Fig. 3, Jurkat cells as well as JAR cells contain a 1.7-kb mRNA species that specifically hybridizes to the hsigma -R1 cDNA probe.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA from Jurkat cells and JAR cells using hsigma -R1 cDNA as the probe.

To provide unequivocal evidence for the presence of the sigma -R1 in Jurkat cells, RT-PCR was carried out with Jurkat cell mRNA using hsigma -R1 cDNA-specific primers. The primers encompassed the entire coding region of the hsigma -R1 cDNA. The RT-PCR yielded a product of expected size. The product was subcloned into pSPORT vector for sequencing and functional expression. Introduction of XbaI and XhoI sites in the primers made it possible to clone the RT-PCR products unidirectionally; the cDNA inserts in the resultant constructs were under the control of T7 promoter. Subcloning of the RT-PCR products obtained with Jurkat cell mRNA yielded two distinct clones, clone A and clone B. These two cDNAs were sequenced. Clone A was exactly identical with the hsigma -R1 cDNA that was cloned previously from the JAR cell line. It contained an open reading frame, coding for a protein of 223 amino acids. Clone B was highly homologous to clone A except that it contained a deletion of 93 bp in the coding region and, in addition, had nucleotide substitutions in three places, resulting in three amino acid substitutions. Clone B, however, contained an open reading frame, coding for a protein of 192 amino acids. Apparently, the size difference between the two RT-PCR products was not large enough to be detected under the conditions used to visualize the size of the RT-PCR products with ethidium bromide. An alignment of the amino acid sequences of clone A and clone B is shown in Fig. 4A. The protein coded by clone B differed from the protein coded by clone A in three places: Ala-13, Leu-28, and Ala-86 in clone A were replaced by Thr-13, Pro-28, and Val-86, respectively, in clone B. The 93-bp deletion in clone B resulted in the deletion of 31 amino acids, corresponding to the amino acid position 119-149 in hsigma -R1 protein.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A, comparison of amino acid sequence of the RT-PCR products obtained from Jurkat cell mRNA (clone A and clone B). B, generation of sigma -R1 and sigma -R1A by alternative splicing.

The human gene for the sigma -R1 has already been characterized (Prasad et al., 1998). It is located on chromosome 9 and it consists of four exons. The third exon is 93 bp long. The 93 bp that was deleted in clone B corresponds to this exon. Therefore, clone B represents an alternatively spliced sigma -R1. The generation of the alternatively spliced sigma -R1 (sigma -R1A) is schematically described in Fig. 4B. Interestingly, clone B also contained three nucleotide substitutions in addition to the deletion of the third exon. This indicates that clone A and clone B did not originate from the same chromosome 9.

Ligand-Binding Characterization of the Jurkat Cell sigma -R1 and sigma -R1A cDNAs. The sigma -R1 cDNA (clone A) was expressed in HeLa cells using the vaccinia virus expression technique. The ligand-binding function of the cDNA was assessed by comparing [3H]haloperidol binding to cell membranes between HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector and HeLa cells transfected with pSPORT-sigma -R1 cDNA construct (Fig. 5). [3H]Haloperidol binding was 2 to 3 times higher in cDNA-transfected cells than in vector-transfected cells, demonstrating that the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA is functionally active in terms of sigma  ligand binding.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course of [3H]haloperidol binding to membranes derived from HeLa cells transfected with empty vector (), sigma -R1 cDNA (open circle ), or sigma -R1A cDNA (black-square). The cDNAs were expressed in HeLa cells by vaccinia virus expression system. Cells transfected with empty vector served as control. Binding assays were done with cell homogenates using 5 nM [3H]haloperidol.

Because clone B contained three amino acid substitutions as well as deletion of exon 3, resulting in the removal of 31 amino acids, we constructed two chimeras between clone A and clone B such that one chimera contained the three amino acid substitutions but no deletion (chimera 1), whereas the other chimera had the deletion of 31 amino acids but not the three amino acid substitutions (chimera 2). Construction of these chimeras was facilitated because of the presence of a single StyI site in clone A and in clone B between the region containing the three amino acid substitutions and the region containing the deletion. Because both clones were ligated in pSPORT vector at an XhoI site at the 5' end and at an XbaI at the 3' end, the XhoI/StyI and XbaI/StyI fragments of the two clones could be exchanged easily to generate the chimeras. Expression of chimera l in HeLa cells indicated that it was able to bind [3H]haloperidol, although to a much lesser extent (~60%) compared to clone A (data not shown). This shows that the three amino acid substitutions interfere to some extent with the ability of the protein to bind [3H]haloperidol. However, chimera 2, which contained the deletion of 31 amino acids, was devoid of sigma  ligand-binding activity. The binding of [3H]haloperidol in HeLa cells transfected with chimera 2 was not significantly different from the binding in vector-transfected control cells (Fig. 5). Thus, the alternatively spliced sigma -R1A, lacking the third exon, is nonfunctional in terms of ligand binding. This was confirmed with two additional sigma  ligands, [3H]-(+)-PPP and [3H]-(+)-pentazocine. sigma -R1 cDNA increased the binding of these ligands in HeLa cells, whereas sigma -R1A cDNA failed to do so (Fig. 6).


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Binding of [3H]-(+)-PPP and [3H]-(+)-pentazocine to membranes derived from HeLa cells transfected with empty vector (pSPORT), sigma -R1 cDNA, or sigma -R1A cDNA. The cDNAs were expressed using the vaccinia virus expression technique. Binding assays were done with cell homogenates using an incubation period of 2.5 h (equilibrium binding) and 5 nM ligand concentration.

Because HeLa cells, which were used here to express heterologously the sigma -R1 and sigma -R1A cDNAs cloned from the Jurkat cells, possess endogenous sigma -R1 activity, it can be argued that the binding data obtained from the cDNA-transfected HeLa cells are possibly due to changes in the expression of the endogenous receptor after the cDNA transfection. To address this issue, we used MCF-7 cells (a human breast cancer cell line) for heterologous expression of the cDNAs. MCF-7 cells do not express sigma -R1 activity (Vilner et al., 1995). There is no detectable saturable binding of (+)-pentazocine, a type 1-specific sigma  ligand, in these cells (Vilner et al., 1995; Seth et al., 1998). Furthermore, Northern blot analysis has shown that MCF-7 cells do not contain mRNA that is hybridizable to the sigma -R1 cDNA (Seth et al., 1998). Therefore, we expressed the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 and sigma -R1A cDNAs in MCF-7 cells and assessed their ligand-binding function using [3H]-(+)-pentazocine as the ligand (Table 2). Haloperidol-inhibitable [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding was negligible in pSPORT-transfected MCF-7 cells, confirming the earlier studies (Vilner et al., 1995; Seth et al., 1998). In contrast, [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding in sigma -R1 cDNA-transfected MCF-7 cells increased 2.5-fold compared with pSPORT-transfected cells; this increased binding was completely inhibitable by haloperidol. These results show that the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA is functional in terms of binding to sigma  ligands in MCF-7 cells, which lack endogenous sigma -R1. Therefore, the binding of sigma  ligands induced by the cDNA in HeLa cells was not due to changes in endogenous sigma -receptor activity. When we performed similar experiments with sigma -R1A cDNA, there was no detectable increase in [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding in MCF-7 cells after transfection with the cDNA, confirming that the cDNA is nonfunctional with respect to sigma  ligand binding.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Expression of sigma -R1 and sigma -R1A cDNAs in MCF-7 cells as assessed by [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding

The Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA is identical with the JAR cell sigma -R1 cDNA cloned previously from our laboratory (Kekuda et al., 1996). To our knowledge, the JAR cell sigma -R1 is the only hsigma -R1 cloned thus far. However, our initial report on the JAR cell sigma -R1 focused primarily on the cloning and structural elucidation of the receptor (Kekuda et al., 1996). Very little is known in terms of the ligand-binding function of this hsigma -R1 cDNA except that, when expressed in HeLa cells, it induces [3H]haloperidol binding and that the cDNA-induced [3H]haloperidol binding is inhibitable by various sigma -receptor-specific ligands. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the ligand-binding function of the hsigma -R1 in a greater detail using the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA. Figure 7 describes the saturation kinetics of [3H]haloperidol binding in control HeLa cells and in HeLa cells expressing the cDNA. The binding is saturable in control HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector, indicating the presence of endogenous sigma -receptor activity in these cells. We have shown previously that HeLa cells possess mRNA that hybridizes to hsigma -R1 cDNA under high stringency conditions (Seth et al., 1998), suggesting that these cells express sigma -R1 constitutively. The kinetic parameters, Kd and Bmax, for the endogenous [3H]haloperidol binding activity, were 1.5 ± 0.3 nM and 2.6 ± 0.4 pmol/mg protein. The binding increased more than 2-fold in HeLa cells transfected with the Jurkat sigma -R1 cDNA. The binding was saturable in cDNA-transfected cells and Kd and Bmax were 1.7 ± 0.2 nM and 6.8 ± 0.6 pmol/mg protein. Kdwas almost the same in control cells and in cDNA-transfected cells, but Bmax in cDNA-transfected cells was 2.6-fold higher than in control cells, indicating that expression of the Jurkat sigma -R1 cDNA in HeLa cells results in an increase in the receptor density with no apparent change in the binding affinity. The cDNA-specific binding data were also analyzed separately. Kd and Bmax for the cDNA-specific binding were 1.9 ± 0.3 nM and 4.2± 0.4 pmol/mg protein.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Saturation kinetics of [3H]haloperidol binding to membranes derived from HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector (open circle ) or sigma -R1 cDNA (). The cDNA was expressed by the vaccinia virus expression technique. Binding assays were done with cell homogenates using [3H]haloperidol in the concentration range of 0.1 to 5 nM. Results are given as Scatchard plots describing the relationship between ligand binding (B) and ligand binding/free ligand concentration (B/F). Inset: Data for sigma -R1 cDNA-specific binding, which were obtained by subtracting the binding in empty vector-transfected cells from the binding in sigma -R1 cDNA-transfected cells. B is given in pmol/106 cells and F is given in nM.

Interaction of Progesterone with the Cloned Jurkat sigma -R1. Progesterone is believed to be an endogenous ligand to sigma -R1. However, the direct binding of this steroid has not been demonstrated with any of the cloned sigma -R1 (guinea pig, rat, mouse, or human). Therefore, we investigated the binding of progesterone to Jurkat cell sigma -R1 using HeLa cells expressing the Jurkat sigma -R1 cDNA. We first measured the binding of [3H]progesterone in control HeLa cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector and in HeLa cells transfected with the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA (Table 3). There was almost a 2-fold increase in the binding in cDNA-transfected cells compared with control cells. The cDNA-specific [3H]progesterone binding was inhibited >90% by the sigma  ligands haloperidol, clorgyline, carbetapentane, and (+)-PPP, indicating that the observed increase is due to specific binding to the cDNA-encoded sigma -receptor. R5020 is a progesterone analog that is an inhibitor of progesterone binding to the progesterone receptor. This compound did not inhibit [3H]progesterone binding in HeLa cells induced by the cDNA. This rules out the participation of the classical progesterone receptor in the observed increase in [3H]progesterone binding in cDNA-transfected cells.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Inhibition of sigma -R1 cDNA-induced [3H]Progesterone binding by sigma  ligands

Fig. 8 describes the kinetics of the cDNA-specific progesterone binding. The binding was saturable and Scatchard analysis of the binding data showed that Kd is 88 ± 7 nM and Bmax is 4.6 ± 0.2 pmol/mg of protein. We also evaluated the kinetic nature of the inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone in control HeLa cells and in cDNA-transfected cells (Fig. 9). In control cells transfected with empty pSPORT vector, progesterone competed with [3H]haloperidol for the binding site. Progesterone (200 nM) increased the Kd for [3H]haloperidol binding from 1.7 ± 0.5 nM to 6.5 ± 1.6 nM. Bmax was not altered significantly (2.2 ± 0.3) pmol/106 cells in the absence of progesterone versus 2.8 ± 0.5 pmol/106 cells in the presence of progesterone). In HeLa cells expressing the Jurkat cell sigma -R1 cDNA, the binding of [3H]haloperidol was increased about 2.5-fold. Again, the inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone was competitive. The Kd value, which was 1.2 ± 0.2 nM in the absence of progesterone, increased to 3.9 ± 0.4 nM in the presence of progesterone. The Bmax value remained the same (5.7 ± 0.4 versus 5.7 ± 0.3 pmol/106 cells).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Saturation kinetics of [3H]progesterone binding induced by sigma -R1 cDNA. HeLa cells were transfected with either empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT-sigma -R1 cDNA. Vaccinia virus expression technique was used to express the cDNA functionally. Cell homogenates were used for [3H]progesterone binding at varying concentrations of progesterone in the range of 10 to 250 nM. The cDNA-specific binding, which was obtained by subtracting the binding in empty vector-transfected cells from the binding in cDNA-transfected cells, was used for data analysis. Inset: Scatchard plot describing the relationship between progesterone binding (B) and progesterone binding/progesterone concentration (B/l).


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Kinetics of inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding by progesterone in control HeLa cells transfected with empty vector (A) and in HeLa cells transfected with sigma -R1 cDNA (B). Vaccinia virus expression technique was used to express the cDNA functionally. Haloperidol binding to cell homogenates was measured with varying concentrations of [3H]haloperidol in the range of 0.5 to 7.5 nM in the absence (open circle ) or presence () of 200 nM progesterone. Data are given as Scatchard plots, describing the relationship between haloperidol binding and haloperidol binding/free haloperidol concentration. Values for binding are given in pmol/106 cells and values for free haloperidol concentration are given in nM.

(+)-Pentazocine is a specific high-affinity ligand and progesterone is a putative endogenous ligand for sigma -R1. Therefore, we analyzed the inhibition of sigma -R1 cDNA-specific [3H]haloperidol binding by these two ligands (Fig. 10). With the concentration of [3H]haloperidol at 3 nM, (+)-pentazocine and progesterone inhibited the binding with IC50 values of 57 ± 8 nM and 279 ± 21 nM, respectively. The corresponding Ki values were 19 ± 3 nM and 93 ± 7 nM. Thus, (+)-pentazocine interacts with the cloned sigma -R1 with high affinity. The Ki value calculated for progesterone is similar to the Kd value (88 ± 7 nM) determined directly from the binding of [3H]progesterone to the cloned receptor. We also analyzed the saturation kinetics of (+)-pentazocine binding to the cloned sigma -R1 (Fig. 11A). The binding was saturable with a Kd of 12 ± 2 nM and a Bmax of 3.7 ± 0.3 pmol/106 cells. The binding of [3H]-(+)-pentazocine (3 nM) to the cloned receptor was inhibitable by progesterone with an IC50 value of 69 ± 19 nM (Fig. 11B). The corresponding Ki value (55 ± 15 nM) is comparable to the Ki value calculated for the inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding (93 ± 7 nM) and the Kd value calculated directly from binding of progesterone (88 ± 7 nM).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Dose-response relationship for the inhibition of [3H]haloperidol binding to the cloned sigma -R1 by (+)-pentazocine (black-square) and progesterone (open circle ). HeLa cells were transfected with either empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT-sigma -R1 cDNA. Vaccinia virus expression technique was used to express the cDNA functionally. Cell homogenates were used for the binding of [3H]haloperidol (3 nM) in the presence of increasing concentrations of (+)-pentazocine and progesterone. The cDNA-specific binding, which was obtained by subtracting the binding in empty vector-transfected cells from the binding in cDNA-transfected cells, was used for data analysis. The results are given as a percentage of control binding measured in the absence of (+)-pentazocine and progesterone.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Saturation kinetics of [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding (A) and inhibition of [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding by progesterone (B). Binding measurements were made in cell homogenates derived from HeLa cells transfected with either empty pSPORT vector or pSPORT-sigma -R1 cDNA. Only the cDNA-specific binding was used for data analysis. Saturation binding was analyzed over a (+)-pentazocine concentration of 3 to 100 nM (A). In inhibition studies with progesterone, the concentration of [3H]-(+)-pentazocine was 3 nM.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

There is increasing evidence that suggests potent immunomodulatory effects of sigma -receptor ligands (Carr et al., 1992; Casellas et al., 1994; Liu et al., 1995; Derocq et al., 1995; Carayon et al., 1995; Bourrie et al., 1995). Because some of these ligands have been shown to elevate the circulating levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines and at the same time to suppress the circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, sigma  ligands may prove to be potentially useful therapeutic agents in the treatment of various immune disorders. sigma -receptors, which are the targets for these ligands, have thus far been studied in immune cells only by ligand binding assays to characterize the pharmacological profiles of these receptors (Su et al., 1988; Wolfe et al., 1988; Carr et al., 1991; Garza et al., 1993). Very little is known about the molecular nature of these receptors. The present investigation was undertaken to study the sigma -receptors in immune cells at molecular level.

We have established in this investigation that Jurkat cells express the recently cloned sigma -R1. This was done by Northern analysis and RT-PCR, which unequivocally showed the presence of sigma -R1 mRNA in these cells. The RT-PCR yielded a functionally active sigma -R1 cDNA as assessed by binding of sigma  ligands. Using this cDNA, we have now investigated the ligand-binding characteristics of the hsigma -R1 for the first time by using heterologous expression systems. These studies have shown that the sigma -R1 cDNA, cloned from the Jurkat cells, induces sigma  ligand binding activity when expressed in HeLa cells and MCF-7 cells. HeLa cells are known to possess endogenous sigma -R1 activity, whereas MCF-7 cells lack sigma -R1 activity. The fact that the sigma -R1 cDNA can be functionally expressed in both of these cells indicates that the cDNA-induced sigma  ligand binding activity is unrelated to the endogenous sigma -R1. The cDNA-induced ligand binding was demonstrated with more than one ligand: haloperidol, (+)-PPP, and (+)-pentazocine. Haloperidol can interact with several subtypes of sigma -receptors, whereas (+)-pentazocine is believed to be a specific ligand for the sigma -R1. This suggests that the cDNA cloned from the Jurkat cells codes for the sigma -R1. When functionally assessed in HeLa cells, the cDNA induces a single saturable binding site that exhibits Kd values of 1.9 ± 0.3 nM for haloperidol and 12 ± 2 nM for (+)-pentazocine. When assessed in native Jurkat cell membranes, haloperidol was found to bind to a single saturable binding site with a Kd of 3.9 ± 0.3 nM. Thus, the affinity for haloperidol for the native Jurkat cell binding site and for the cDNA-induced binding site was comparable.

The time course of [3H]haloperidol binding to either native Jurkat cell membranes or HeLa cell membranes expressing the cloned sigma -R1 showed that the binding reached equilibrium only with incubation periods of >2 h. Similar observations were made when haloperidol binding to human placental brush-border membranes was studied (Ramamoorthy et al., 1995). A survey of the literature on the binding of haloperidol to membrane preparations shows that a 90- to 120-min incubation period has been used in a majority of the studies. sigma -R1 is membrane-bound and is associated with the plasma membrane as well as with intracellular membranes. The cloned receptor possesses a single putative transmembrane domain. The exact membrane topology of the receptor is not known; neither is the location of the ligand-binding site. Because membrane preparations exist as vesicles to a significant extent, the slow reaching of equilibrium binding suggests that the binding site may not be readily accessible to the ligand in these membrane vesicles. This is, however, only speculative because the exact topology of the ligand-binding site has not yet been elucidated.

Interaction with progesterone is a characteristic that is unique to the sigma -R1 because other subtypes of sigma -receptor do not bind this steroid. We have shown in this study that the cloned Jurkat cell sigma -R1 binds progesterone. This is the first demonstration of the direct interaction of progesterone with a cloned sigma -R1. The cDNA-induced progesterone binding was inhibitable by various sigma  ligands but not by R5020, a steroid analog that antagonizes the binding of progesterone to the classical progesterone receptor. We have also shown that progesterone was a competitive inhibitor of the cDNA-induced haloperidol binding. The interaction of progesterone with the cloned Jurkat cell sigma -R1 was of high affinity as suggested by the Kd value (~80 nM). Because progesterone is thought to be an endogenous ligand for the sigma -R1, the high-affinity interaction between the cloned sigma -R1 and the steroid as demonstrated in this study is physiologically relevant. Progesterone concentrations in human plasma are in the range of 30 to 40 nM (Johansson, 1969), a value that is close to the observed Kd value. In women, the circulating levels of progesterone vary dramatically under various physiological conditions such as menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The levels are known to be as high as 500 nM in late pregnancy (Johansson, 1969). It is therefore likely that, with a Kd value of ~80 nM, the fractional occupancy of the receptor with progesterone fluctuates markedly in women depending on the physiological status. This would mean that the biological effects of progesterone that are mediated by the interaction of this steroid with the sigma -R1 may vary in magnitude in women under different physiological conditions, determined by the circulating levels of progesterone. Progesterone has been shown to be active in anti-inflammatory tests (Siiteri et al., 1977) and a direct comparison between the relative affinities of various steroids for the sigma -R1 and the relative potencies of these steroids in anti-inflammatory tests has suggested that the immunomodulatory effects of progesterone are likely to be produced through the sigma -receptor (Siiteri et al., 1977; Su et al., 1988). These observations are especially relevant to pregnancy, when the circulating levels of progesterone are high enough to saturate the sigma -R1 in immune cells, because it is possible that the immunosuppressive function of progesterone may play a significant role in the maternal immunotolerance of the placental allograft.

Another significant aspect of the present study was the demonstration of the existence of an alternatively spliced form of the sigma -R1. This receptor variant, sigma -R1A, arises as a result of deletion of the third exon. This causes the deletion of 31 amino acids. This alternatively spliced receptor variant is inactive as assessed by the binding of haloperidol, (+)-PPP, and (+)-pentazocine. We have not yet studied the expression of the alternatively spliced variant in normal tissues. The inactive nature of this variant implies that the generation of this variant in immune cells is likely to have profound consequences in immune function. Furthermore, because the sigma -R1 is expressed in other tissues as well, especially in the nervous system, the consequences of the production of the inactive variant would involve multiple organs. Therefore, the evidence provided in this study for the occurrence of an inactive splice variant of the sigma -R1 may have clinical significance.

    Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sarah A. Taylor and Ida O. Walker for excellent secretarial assistance.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 23, 1998.

Received for publication May 1, 1998.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DA 10045 (V.G.) and GM 54122 (M.E.G.).

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Vadivel Ganapathy, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia. E-mail: vganapat{at}mail.mcg.edu

    Abbreviations

(+)-PPP, (+)-1-propyl-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)piperidine; DTG, 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine; (-)-PPAP, (-)-N-(3-phenyl-1-propyl)-1-phenyl-2-aminopropane; sigma -R1, type 1 sigma -receptor; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; sigma -R1A, alternatively spliced sigma -R1; hsigma -R1, human sigma -R1.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/99/2891-0251$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics