JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, K. S.

Vol. 288, Issue 2, 597-606, February 1999

Differences in Excretion of Hippurate, as a Metabolite of Benzoate and as an Administered Species, in the Single-Pass Isolated Perfused Rat Kidney Explained1

Wanping Geng and K. Sandy Pang

Faculty of Pharmacy (W.G., K.S.P.) and Department of Pharmacology (K.S.P.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

The extents of excretion of [14C]hippurate and [3H]hippurate were compared in the single-pass, constant flow (8 ml/min) isolated rat kidney which was perfused simultaneously with tracer concentrations of [14C]benzoate and [3H]hippurate. The steady-state renal extraction ratio of [14C]benzoate was 0.26 ± 0.04 and was associated with a renal clearance of 1.13 ± 0.17 ml/min/g. The urinary clearance of [14C]benzoic acid was low (0.011 ± 0.01 ml/min/g), yielding a low fractional excretion [unbound urinary clearance/glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] value of 0.27 ± 0.19 and suggesting that glycination of [14C]benzoate to [14C]hippurate accounted almost completely for the total renal clearance. Fractional excretion for preformed [3H]hippurate was eight times that of GFR, but the steady-state renal extraction ratio of preformed [3H]hippurate, E{pmi} (0.24 ± 0.05) was much lower than the apparent extraction ratio of the renally formed [14C]hippuric acid [E{mi} = 0.39 ± 0.09] (p < .05). The theoretical basis for the discrepancy was explored with mathematical formulations developed from a physiologically based model of the kidney. It was found that parent drug kinetic parameters (transport and metabolic intrinsic clearance of benzoate) were unimportant for E{mi} or E{pmi}. Rather, the value of EK{mi} exceeded EK{pmi} because of the ratio of efflux clearances at the basolateral and luminal membranes for urate hippurate was less than 26.089, a value determined by the GFR, plasma renal flow, and the unbound fraction of hippurate of the system that would render E{mi} to equal E{pmi} in the system. The influx clearance for hippurate to enter from plasma to cell at the basolateral membrane and the reabsorption clearance of hippurate to enter from tubular urine to cell at the luminal membrane failed to alter the ratio of EK{pmi}/EK{mi}.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

The kidney, a key organ for the maintenance of water and electrolyte balance, is capable of synthesis, metabolism, and secretion of hormones and is responsible for the excretion of drugs and synthetic compounds, particularly biotransformation products that are usually of greater polarity than the parent compounds (see recent review, Lohr et al., 1998). The kinetics of renal drug excretion are complex (Cummings et al., 1967, Garrett, 1978): the free species undergoes glomerular filtration and additional secretion results when substrate in the postglomerular circulation enters the basolateral and then the brush border (luminal) membranes into tubular urine, with the kinetic events being complicated by reabsorption at the brush border membrane. The scenario is complex because membrane transport processes at the basolateral and brush border membranes operate in both directions and are subject to local pH conditions that influence passive diffusion and saturation behaviors of carrier proteins that effect facilitative transport (Garrett, 1978; Levy, 1980; Tucker, 1981; Lohr et al., 1998).

The kinetics involving metabolite formation and excretion in the kidney are even more elaborate (Diamond and Quebbeman, 1981; Tremaine et al., 1984; de Lannoy et al., 1990). For the in vivo system in which metabolite formed by the kidney is directly excreted into urine and reenters the circulation, the apparent clearance of the formed metabolite estimated by conventional methods (urinary clearance/midpoint concentration) is not constant and exceeds that for the preformed metabolite (Wan and Riegelman, 1972; de Lannoy et al., 1989, 1990; de Lannoy and Pang, 1993; Kugler et al., 1996). In vivo, has been suggested that the handling of a metabolite formed from drug differs from that of the metabolite (preformed) administered to the kidney (Garrett, 1978), that the apparent renal clearance of the formed metabolite exceeds the renal clearance of the metabolite given per se as a preformed species, provided that the same transport processes are involved in the handling of both the formed and preformed metabolites, and given that there is lack of reabsorption (efflux) of the metabolite and absence of interaction between the parent drug and metabolite (Tucker, 1981).

Differentiation of the renal handling of formed and preformed metabolite in a recirculating system or in vivo is difficult (de Lannoy et al., 1990). For this reason, the single-pass isolated perfused rat kidney (IPK) preparation is ideal for distinguishing the fate of the preformed versus formed metabolite in the kidney, when both precursor and metabolite, labeled with different radiolabeled isotopes, are given simultaneously at tracer concentrations to the IPK (de Lannoy et al., 1989). The single-pass IPK precludes recirculation of the venous metabolite back to the kidney and allows for mass balance considerations and quantitation of the kinetics in absence of added organs. In this instance, one could postulate that because of filtration of the preformed but not the formed metabolite species which originates within the postglomerular region in situ the kidney that precludes filtration, the urinary clearance (CLtot,K{pmi}) for a preformed metabolite that is solely excreted is greater in comparison to the apparent clearance of the metabolite formed from its precursor CLtot,K{mi}, unless a transport barrier for entry of the metabolite exists (deLannoy et al., 1990). Renal metabolic studies on the comparative fates of the diacid metabolite [14C]enalaprilat generated from [14C]enalapril and preformed [3H]enalaprilat in the single-pass isolated perfused rat kidney preparation indeed showed that CLtot,K{mi} > CLtot,K{pmi} (de Lannoy et al., 1989). The observation was explained by the existence of a transport barrier at the basolateral membrane for the metabolite enalaprilat (de Lannoy et al., 1990) and was later confirmed with multiple indicator dilution studies (Schwab et al., 1992). Since renal metabolism and the resulting toxicity of xenobiotics have been well recognized (Elfarra and Anders, 1984; Spry et al., 1985; Stevens et al., 1988; Monks et al., 1990), the circumstances and the determining factors surrounding the renal clearance of the preformed metabolite that result in a different apparent renal clearance of the formed metabolite need to be clarified.

The present study was designed to address these issues through experimental and theoretical examinations. Experimentally, the handling of a formed versus preformed metabolite was compared with benzoate and hippurate in the single-pass IPK. Much is known about the precursormetabolite pair. Hippurate is formed via the conjugation of benzoate with glycine which occurs in the kidney (Wan and Riegelman, 1972; Kao et al., 1978; Poon and Pang, 1995), although the reaction also takes place in liver (Bridges et al., 1970; Chiba et al., 1994) and in the intestine (Strahl and Barr, 1971). Glycine conjugation is catalyzed by benzoyl-Co A synthetase and benzoyl-Co A-glycine N-acyltransferase in the matrix of mitochondria (Gatley and Sherratt, 1977). The inhibition of these two enzymes or the reduced availability of Co A will also affect the hepatic glycine conjugation (Amsel and Levy, 1969; Gregus et al., 1992, 1993). The uptake of hippurate across the basolateral membrane of the dog kidney was saturable with a high Km (223 mM) (Knoefel and Huang, 1959; Russel et al., 1989). The inhibitory constants of hippurate on uptake of p-aminohippurate (PAH) were 4.8 and 11.6 mM in dog renal basolateral and brush border membrane vesicles, respectively (Russel and Vermeulen, 1994). The precursor, benzoate, also inhibited the uptake of PAH in dog renal basolateral and brush border membrane vesicles (Russel et al., 1991) and repressed the sodium-dependent reabsorption of lactate in the rat kidney (Ullrich et al., 1982; Ullrich and Rumich, 1988).

Although concentration-dependent removal of benzoate was found in the single-pass IPK preparation, the apparent extraction ratio of renally formed hippurate was constant (0.48) among all concentrations (Poon and Pang, 1995). Yet the fate of preformed hippurate was not directly investigated. In the present study, we compared the renal elimination of [14C]hippurate formed from tracer [14C]benzoate and of preformed [3H]hippurate when [14C]benzoate and [3H]hippurate were delivered simultaneously at tracer concentrations to the single-pass IPK preparation to obtain paired observations on the metabolites in the kidney. We explored, with the use of a physiological model, the analytical solutions for the clearances (or extraction ratio) of the drug and preformed metabolite, and the apparent clearance (or extraction ratio) of the formed metabolite species under linear conditions. With these solutions, parameters pertaining to the transport of benzoate and hippurate and the metabolite intrinsic clearances of benzoate were optimized for the observed data. The solutions were also used to divulge the interrelationships among the transport clearances and metabolic intrinsic clearance on the kinetics of formed versus preformed metabolite species.

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

Source of Materials

[14C]Benzoic acid (specific activity, 16.0 mCi/mmol) was purchased from New England Nuclear Company (Boston, MA). The radiochemical purity of [14C]benzoate was >99%, as judged by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). [2-3H]Glycine that was used for the synthesis of [3H]hippurate (38.8 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Dupont (Boston, MA). All reagents used were of glass-distilled HPLC grade or were of the highest purity available.

Synthesis of [3H]Hippurate

[3H]Hippurate was chemically synthesized from benzoyl chloride and [3H]glycine according to the method of Ingersoll and Babcock (1943). [3H]Glycine (0.026 µmol in 1 ml of 2% ethanolic water) was dried under nitrogen in a test tube, and unlabeled glycine (4.97 µmol) and 6.25 µmol of sodium hydroxide in 1 ml of distilled water were added and mixed. Then 10 µmol of NaOH (100 µl of 1 N NaOH) was added dropwise as the test tube was thoroughly mixed and the speed of sodium hydroxide addition affected the yield of the reaction. The reaction mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 60 min before termination of the reaction by placement in an ice bucket, and 400 µl of 0.1 N HCl was added. The formed [3H]hippuric acid in the aqueous phase was extracted into ether, which was transferred to a separate test tube and dried under N2. The residue was reconstituted in water and further purified by HPLC. After purification, the specific activity of synthesized [3H]hippurate was 56 µCi/µmol, and the radiochemical purity was >98% as judged by HPLC.

Kidney Perfusion

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, St. Constant, Quebec City, Canada; 402 ± 11 g) were fed ad libitum and allowed free access to water. The animals were housed in a room with a 12-h light/dark cycle. Isolated rat kidney perfusion was performed according to Ross (1978) and de Lannoy et al. (1989). Before surgery, the animals were anesthetized by an i.p. administration of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg b.wt.). The surgical procedure and the perfusion apparatus were identical to those described previously (Poon and Pang, 1995). The perfusate, consisting of 20% washed bovine red blood cells (Ryding-Meat Packer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), 4% bovine serum albumin (Fraction V; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO), 5 mM glucose, and a complement of 20 amino acids in Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate solution buffered to pH 7.4 was oxygenated with 95% oxygen-5% carbon dioxide (Matheson Gas, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Unlabeled inulin (50 µM) was added to the perfusate in reservoir, and its clearance was used for estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The kidney was first equilibrated under constant perfusion pressure (approximately 90 mm Hg) for 20 min and then the perfusion was continued under constant perfusate flow rate (8 ml/min) for the remainder of the experiment (50 min). During the entire experiment, urine was collected into preweighed microfuge tubes at 5-min intervals. The volume of urine was measured gravimetrically, with the assumption that the specific gravity is unity. Three samples were taken from the reservoir at 7.5, 27.5, and 47.5 min postequilibration to determine the steady-state input concentration (CIn), whereas the outflow perfusate was sampled at the midpoint of each of the 5-min intervals (2.5, 7.5, 12.5, 17.5, 22.5, 27.5, 32.5, 37.5, 42.5, and 47.5 min); the data obtained for the last five samples were averaged to provide the steady-state output plasma concentration (COut).

Red Blood Cell Distribution and Protein Binding of [3H]Hippurate

Blank blood perfusate (4% albumin) containing 40% of washed bovine red blood cells (RBCs) (v/v) was diluted with plasma perfusate containing [3H]hippurate to result in 20% RBC blood perfusate. [14C]Sucrose, a reference that does not enter into the red blood cell, was also included. After admixture, samples were incubated at 37°C and duplicate samples were taken at various times up to 3 h. The radioactivities of [3H]hippurate and [14C]sucrose in plasma before and after dilution were assayed using the liquid scintillation counter (model LS 5801; Beckman Instruments, Beckman Canada, Mississauga, Canada); the hematocrit of each sample was determined by a hematocrit centrifuge (Microfuge B; Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). The concentration ratio of [3H]hippurate in RBC water to the unbound [3H]hippurate in plasma water, lambda HA, was estimated as a ratio of the activities in RBC water and plasma water:
&lgr;<SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>c<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB>/f<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB></NU><DE>(<UP>f<SUB>u</SUB></UP>C<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB><UP>/</UP>f<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>)</DE></FR> (1)
where cr and cp are the total (bound and unbound) concentrations of [3H]hippurate in RBC and plasma, respectively, fr and fp are the fractions of RBCs and plasma which are water (0.70 and 0.94 for 4% albumin), respectively, and fu is the unbound fraction in plasma. Since the resulting plasma concentrations for the sucrose tracer (c*suc) and the tracer hippurate (c*p) after admixture are related to the original amounts of added sucrose and hippurate radioactivity, R*suc and R*HA, respectively, and the newly diluted volume (V) and hematocrit (Hct) these concentrations, c*suc and c*p, are expressed as:
c<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>suc</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>suc</UP></SUB></NU><DE><UP>V</UP>(1−<UP>Hct</UP>)</DE></FR> (2)
c<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB></NU><DE><UP>V</UP>(1−<UP>Hct</UP>)(1+<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>&bgr;&lgr;<SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB>)</DE></FR> (3)
where beta  is the volume ratio of RBC water to plasma water,
&bgr;=<FR><NU>f<SUB><UP>r</UP></SUB><UP>Hct</UP></NU><DE>f<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>(1−<UP>Hct</UP>)</DE></FR> (4)
Division of eq. 2 by eq. 3 and further substitution of lambda HA (eq. 1) and beta  (eq. 4) result in the following (Pang et al., 1995),
<FR><NU>c<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>suc</UP></SUB></NU><DE>c<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>suc</UP></SUB></NU><DE>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB></DE></FR>+<FR><NU>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>suc</UP></SUB></NU><DE>R<SUP>*</SUP><SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB></DE></FR><UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>&bgr;&lgr;<SUB><UP>HA</UP></SUB> (5)
Since (c*suc/c*p), beta , (R*suc/R*HA), and fu are known, lambda HA is readily estimated from eq. 5.

The corresponding plasma samples containing the tracer [3H]hippurate were used for the determination of the unbound fraction (fu) by ultrafiltration (Centricon Amicon, Beverly, MA; 10,000 molecular weight cutoff). The samples were centrifuged at 1000g for 20 min at room temperature. The unbound fraction in plasma was estimated as the ratio of the disintegrations per minute (dpm) of [3H]hippurate in the ultrafiltrate (unbound) to that in original plasma (total).

Analytical Methods

Viability. Perfusate and urine samples were analyzed for sodium, potassium, glucose, and inulin. Sodium and potassium were determined by flame photometry (IL 943 Flame Photometer; Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA). Glucose was assayed by the oxygen rate method (Glucose Analyzer 2; Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA). The percentage of reabsorbed sodium and glucose were used as indices for the reabsorptive function of the isolated IPK. Inulin in urine and plasma was determined using the UV method of Heyrovsky (1956) at 550 nm.

Drug and Metabolite Assays. [14C]Benzoic acid, formed [14C]hippurate, and preformed [3H]hippurate in urine and plasma were separated by a HPLC method with UV detection of methoxybenzoic acid, the internal standard (Chiba et al., 1994). The radiolabeled compounds eluted from the HPLC system were collected at predetermined collection intervals. Quantification was performed with calibration curves constructed with varying amounts of radioactive [14C]benzoate and [3H]hippurate added to plasma and urine.

Calculations. The plasma clearance of inulin was used as an estimate of GFR, and the value was normalized to the weight of the unperfused left kidney. The percentage of reabsorption of sodium and glucose was calculated as: [(filtered load - excreted load)/filtered load] × 100%.

The urinary excretory clearance (CLu,K) is the ratio of the excretion rate (product of the drug urinary concentration, Cu, and the urinary flow rate, Qu, and the steady-state input plasma concentration, CIn. The fractional excretion (FE) is the unbound urinary clearance (CLu,K/fu) normalized to GFR which was defined by the renal clearance of inulin. The total renal clearance (CLtot,K), which encompasses the components of filtration, secretion, reabsorption, and metabolism at steady-state, is given as the product of renal steady-state extraction ratio of benzoate (EK) and renal plasma flow (QK),
<UP>CL</UP><SUB>tot,K</SUB>=<UP>E</UP><SUB>K</SUB><UP>Q</UP><SUB>K</SUB> (6)
Similarly, the product of the renal steady-state extraction ratio of [3H]hippurate, EK{pmi}, and the plasma flow rate (QK) yields the renal clearance of hippurate. Since the plasma flow rate is effectively reduced by the urine flow rate (Qu) due to filtration/reabsorption of water, EK is expressed as the difference between the steady-state input rate and output rate divided by the input rate; CIn and COut are the steady-state input and output plasmas concentrations of drug:
<UP>E</UP><SUB>K</SUB>=<FR><NU><UP>Q</UP><SUB>K</SUB><UP>C<SUB>In</SUB></UP>−(<UP>Q</UP><SUB>K</SUB>−<UP>Q</UP><SUB>u</SUB>)<UP>C</UP><SUB><UP>Out</UP></SUB></NU><DE><UP>Q</UP><SUB>K</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB><UP>In</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (7)
The same relationship holds for the extraction ratio of the preformed metabolite EK{pmi}.

Since removal of the formed [14C]hippurate is solely by excretion, the apparent extraction ratio of the formed hippurate, EK{mi}, was expressed as:
<UP>E</UP><SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}=<FR><NU><UP>excretion rate of mi</UP></NU><DE><UP>formation rate of mi</UP></DE></FR> (8)
=<FR><NU><UP>Q</UP><SUB>u</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>Q</UP><SUB>u</SUB><UP>C</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}+(<UP>Q</UP><SUB>K</SUB>−<UP>Q</UP><SUB>u</SUB>)<UP>C</UP><SUB><UP>Out</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</DE></FR>
where COut{mi} is the steady state output concentration of the found metabolite. Data obtained at steady-state were expressed as the mean ± S.D. and were compared with use of Student's paired t test. The difference was viewed as significant when p < .05.

Physiological Modeling. The handling of benzoate and hippurate by the kidney was examined with a physiological model similar to that used previously (Hekman and van Ginneken, 1982; deLannoy et al., 1990; Sirianni and Pang, 1998). In this model, tubular reabsorption of water (from lumen into plasma of peritubular circulation) was not taken into consideration in mass transfer relationships. The kidney is subdivided into three distinct compartments: the vascular (plasma), tissue (tubular cell), and urine (tubular lumen) compartments (Fig. 1).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Physiological models for renal elimination of a substrate that is both metabolized and excreted by kidney as the only eliminating organ. The kidney is divided into three compartments: plasma, tissue, and urine. The outflow plasma does not recirculate to the reservoir in the single-pass system. The amount of drug in reservoir (AR) entering the kidney plasma (APK) is first filtered, and only that in the postglomerular circulation reaches the renal tubular cells. Exchange of drug between renal plasma and tissue is characterized by influx (CLinb) and efflux (CLefb) clearances across the renal basolateral (b) membrane, and the exchange between urine and tissue is characterized by CLinl and CLefl at the luminal (l) membrane. Drug within the kidney tissue (AK) is metabolized with a renal metabolic intrinsic clearance, CLint,K. Urinary excretion of drug is a function of urine flow (Qu) and the net transfer clearances at both basolateral and luminal membranes. See Appendix for the definition of the terms. Parameters associated with the metabolite are further qualified by {mi}, and mass transfer for the preformed metabolite was not shown. See Appendix for the definition of other parameters.

Only linear conditions are considered since tracer concentrations were used in the present study. The mass balance differential equations and the definition of terms which describe the rates of change of drug (benzoic acid) and metabolite [preformed {pmi} and renally formed {mi} hippurate] between the renal compartments during single-pass perfusion are summarized in the Appendix. Upon presenting the coefficients as elements in a 7 × 7 matrix, inversion of the resulting square matrix on the POWERMac (Theorist; Prescience, San Francisco, CA) furnished solutions for the amounts of drug and formed metabolite in renal plasma (PK) and urine (u) at steady-state; Upon division by the respective volume terms, these in turn provided the concentrations of drug and formed metabolites in each compartment. Likewise, inversion of the 4 × 4-square matrix based on coefficients from equations for preformed hippurate yielded solutions pertaining to the preformed metabolite.

The analytical solutions provided the basis for exploration of the sensitivity of the extraction ratios, EK, EK{mi}, EK{pmi}, and the urinary and renal clearances toward changes in the transport clearances at the basolateral and brush border membranes of the kidney. Moreover, the transport and metabolic intrinsic clearance values were optimized to provide predicted EK values and clearances that matched closely with the observations; the unbound fractions of drug and metabolite in renal tissue were assumed to equal those in plasma. Simulations were then performed with the optimized parameters to explore the dependency of the EK{mi} and EK{pmi} on drug transport and metabolic parameters, GFR, the unbound fractions, and the transport parameters for the metabolite.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

Protein Binding and RBC Distribution of [3H]Hippurate

The unbound fraction of [3H]hippurate in plasma (fu{mi}) determined by ultrafiltration at 25°C was 0.48 and was not expected to change dramatically at 37°C due to the low extent of binding. The blood/plasma concentration ratio of [3H]hippurate was 0.84 ± 0.02 (n = 10), which was almost identical with the value of [1 - hematocrit] (0.86 ± 0.01) in the same samples (p > .05); the RBC/plasma water distribution ratio (lambda HA) was zero. The blood/plasma ratio of [14C]sucrose in the same sample was 0.86 ± 0.02 and was not different from [1 - hematocrit]. These observations suggest that hippurate was not distributed into RBCs, as reported elsewhere (Yoshimura et al., 1998).

Isolated Rat Kidney Perfusion (IPK)

Viability of the IPK. Glucose reabsorption of the IPK during the steady-state (35-50 min) single-pass perfusion was 95 ± 4% (mean ± S.D. of five preparations), whereas that for sodium reabsorption was lower (73 ± 11%). The GFR and the urinary flow rate were 0.34 ± 0.09 and 0.11 ± 0.05 ml/min/g, respectively (Table 1). The increase in weight of the perfused right kidney (1.85 ± 0.08 g) to that of the unperfused left kidney (1.54 ± 0.1 g) was only 20 ± 5%. These indices on viability were generally similar to those reported previously for the single-pass rat kidney perfused under constant flow (deLannoy et al., 1989; Poon and Pang, 1995).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Renal handling of tracer concentrations of [14C]benzoate and [3H]hippurate by the constant flow (8 ml/min) single-pass IPKa

Elimination of [14C]Benzoate, [14C]Hippurate, and [3H]Hippurate. Steady-state was readily attained in the rat IPK perfused in a single-pass fashion with tracer [14C]benzoate (30,200 ± 4,100 dpm/ml or 0.86 ± 0.12 µM), shown by the constancy in the output rates of [14C]benzoate and [14C]hippurate in venous plasma and urine (Fig. 2A). The steady-state extraction ratio of [14C]benzoic acid was 0.26 ± 0.04 (mean ± S.D., n = 5, Table 1). However, the urinary clearance of unchanged benzoic acid was very small and variable (0.011 ± 0.01 ml/min/g) with an FE value of 0.27 ± 0.19, and 99% of the renal clearance (1.13 ± 0.17 ml/min/g) was attributed to the metabolic clearance (1.12 ± 0.17 ml/min/g) for glycine conjugation in the formation of [14C]hippurate. These values agreed with those previously obtained for benzoate given at tracer concentrations to the rat IPK (Poon and Pang, 1995). Almost half of the formed [14C]hippurate was excreted immediately into urine, and the apparent extraction ratio or EK{mi} was 0.39 ± 0.09. The ratio of the apparent renal clearance of [14C]hippurate (EK{mi}QK) to fu{mi} GFR was 11.3 ± 3.3. 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The observed output rates of [14C]benzoate (BA) and [14C]hippurate (HA) in venous plasma and urine, after single-pass delivery of [14C]benzoate to the constant flow IPK (8 ml/min) (A), and those for the simultaneously perfused [3H]hippurate (B) were plotted versus the postequilibration perfusion time. The lines were simulated data based on predictions afforded by the optimized parameters shown in Table 3 and the rate equations shown in the Appendix.

Steady-state was also reached for the preformed metabolite, [3H]hippurate (44,000 ± 5,400 dpm/ml or 0.35 ± 0.04 µM) that was administered simultaneously with [14C]benzoate. This was shown by the constancy in the levels of [3H]hippurate in both venous plasma and urine (Fig. 2B). The renal steady-state extraction ratio of preformed hippurate (EK{pmi} = 0.24 ± 0.05) was, however, lower than the value of EK{mi} (p < .05); its value was not close to unity as expected for other species (Przedlacki et al., 1968; Shames and Korobkin 1976; Spustová et al., 1991). The renal clearance of [3H]hippurate in IPK was 1.1 ± 0.2 ml/min/g; the average FE value was 7.7 ± 1.0 times that of the GFR (Table 1). There was a greater fluctuation existing in the levels of preformed [3H]hippurate in plasma and urine in comparison to those bearing the [14C] label originating from [14C]benzoate, which was not excreted much, and formed [14C]hippurate which was excreted to a greater extent than preformed [3H]hippurate.

Physiological Modeling

The mass transfer rate equations pertaining to drug and metabolite and to the preformed hippurate are summarized in the Appendix. Inversion of the resulting matrices for benzoate and formed hippurate and for preformed hippurate yielded analytical solutions for the steady-state output concentrations of drug and formed/preformed metabolite in venous plasma and urine. These in turn were substituted into eqs. 6 to 8 to provide the total renal and urinary clearance of benzoate, and the extraction ratios of the formed and preformed hippurate (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Solved equations for renal physiological model, when renal metabolism and excretion occur for the precursor and excretion occurs for the metabolite

The analytical solution of EK{mi}, solved for the first time, provided the needed comparison with EK{pmi} (Table 2). It was found that GFR and parameters associated with the precursor were absent in the solution for the formed metabolite, EK{mi}, i.e., the extent of excretion of formed hippurate was dependent only on its unbound fraction in plasma and influx and efflux clearances across the renal basolateral and brush border membranes, its unbound fraction, and the plasma and urinary flow rates. In comparison, the extraction ratio for preformed hippurate, EK{pmi}, was additionally dependent on the GFR. The difference between EK{pmi} and EK{mi} became zero when CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} = (QK - fu{mi}GFR)/(fu{mi}GFR) (see Table 2) or 26.089 after substitution of the experimentally observed values of QK, fu{mi}, and GFR into the relationship. At CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} > 26.089, EK{pmi} exceeds EK{mi}, whereas when CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} < 26.089, EK{mi} exceeds EK{pmi}. The ratio of EK{pmi}/EK{mi} was described by a relation in which the drug transport and metabolic parameters and the reabsorption clearance of mi (CLinl{mi}) were absent (Table 2).

Simulations. The values of the volumes of renal plasma, renal tissue, and tubular urine used for simulation were similar to those previously reported (Table 3), whereas the flow rates and unbound fractions were experimentally determined; CLint,K was set as 40 ml/min/g, a value similar to the ratio Vmax/Km or 195 nmol/min/g/5.3 µM reported for the glycination of benzoate in the IPK (Poon and Pang, 1995). The solutions in Table 2 were used to provide optimized parameter of CLinb, CLefb, CLinl, CLefl, CLint,K, CLinb{mi}, CLefb{mi}, CLinl{mi}, or CLefl{mi}. Formulations of the clearances of drug and formed and preformed metabolites (Table 2) were placed in mathematical worksheets (Excel, version 5; Microsoft, Seattle, WA), and each parameter was varied individually to examine the range of values that would yield predicted values that closely matched the observations. The optimized parameters are summarized in Table 3. The appropriateness of these parameters were shown by the ability of the parameters to provide closely matching urinary venous plasma output rates of benzoate and formed hippurate (Fig. 2A) and of preformed hippurate (Fig. 2B), and clearances and extraction ratios values for benzoate and formed and preformed hippurate similar to those observed (Table 1). The ratio of CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} was 4:38 or 0.11, a value much less than 26.089, and was consistent with the view that EK{pmi} < EK{mi}.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Parameter values used in computer simulation of benzoate (BA) and hippurate (HA) kinetics in the IPK

Changes in EK{pmi}, EK{mi}, and the ratio, EK{pmi}/EK{mi} are simulated with the set of parameters shown in Table 3. The influence of CLinb{mi}, CLefb{mi}, CLinl{mi}, and CLefl{mi} on EK{pmi} and EK{mi} was generally similar, although values for EK{pmi} were lower than those for EK{mi} for the same given CLefb{mi}, CLinl{mi}, and CLefl{mi} values used for simulation (data not shown). The difference was better displayed in the ratio, EK{pmi}/EK{mi} versus changes in CLefl{mi}/CLefb{mi} and CLinl{mi}, or CLinb{mi} (Fig. 3). For the given set of values of GFR, plasma and urinary flow rates, and unbound fraction of hippurate, the ratio of EK{pmi}/EK{mi} was unity when the efflux clearances at the basolateral/brush border membranes (CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi}) approximated 26.089, in which case the ratio became insensitive to changes in the influx clearance of hippurate CLinl{mi}. At other times when CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} > 26.089, values for EK{pmi}/EK{mi} exceeded unity, and increasing values of the influx metabolite clearance CLinb{mi} decreased the values of EK{pmi}/EK{mi}. At CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} < 26.089, however, ratios of EK{pmi}/EK{mi} remained below unity, and these tended to increase toward unity with increasing influx clearance CLinb{mi} (Fig. 3A). The ratio, EK{pmi}/EK{mi}, was independent of values of the reabsorptive clearance at the luminal membrane (CLinl{mi}) (Fig. 3B) and was not very sensitive to small changes in GFR (data not shown).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Simulated ratios of EK{pmi}/EK{mi}, based on analytical solutions and parameter values outlined in Tables 2 and 3, are plotted against ratios of CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} and the influx clearance at the basolateral membrane CLinb{mi} (A) or the reabsorption clearance at the luminal membrane, CLinl{mi} (B). The value of CLefl{mi} was fixed (38 ml/min/g) whereas that for CLefb{mi} was varied. The parameters varied are shown on the x- and y-axes.

Nonlinear fitting of the data with equations in the Appendix, with the optimized values (Table 3) as initial estimates failed to provide good fits. The reabsorption clearances for drug and metabolite became negative numbers. The underlying reason may be due to a relative large number of parameters for estimation and the relative few data points (steady-state data became time invariant).

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

The single-pass IPK preparation is an ideal model to examine the dynamic interplay of filtration, metabolism, reabsorption, and secretion of the kidney, and to obtain comparative data on formed metabolite and preformed metabolite kinetics with differentially labeled precursor and preformed metabolite. In parallel, examination with the physiological model provided the theoretical basis on the kinetic behaviors expected of the observed data. The premise of the comparative kinetics and the analytical solutions was based on the lack of interaction between benzoate and preformed hippurate, as well as between the formed and preformed hippurate, and preservation of linearity of the system. The total, metabolic, and urinary clearances and FE value of benzoate (Table 1) were similar to those observed previously when the low benzoate concentration was given alone (Poon and Pang, 1995). The apparent renal clearance of formed hippurate that coexisted with tracer preformed [3H]hippurate in the present study (11.0 ± 3.3) was not different (p > .05) from the apparent renal clearance of hippurate formed from benzoate (9.4 ± 3.6) in previous IPK studies (Poon and Pang, 1995). With these indices for benzoate and hippurate remaining constant, we concluded that the experimental condition of using only tracer concentrations of [3H]hippurate and [14C]benzoate (micromolar range) is devoid of interactions, thus preserving linearity of the system and justifying use of linear algebra for arriving at the analytical solutions. The view is likely correct since the Km values (millimolar) for transport are high.

The theoretical examination had advanced our understanding of the difference in kinetics between the formed and preformed metabolite in the kidney (Table 2). The theory is based only on the linearity of the system and is not predicated on the lack of efflux of metabolite back to the circulation or lack of reabsorption of the metabolite, as previously suggested (Garrett, 1978; Tucker, 1981). With these formulations on hand, optimized parameters for benzoate and hippurate transport are readily found (Table 3). These represent reasonably high influx clearances across the basolateral membrane for benzoate and hippurate (13 and 14 ml/min/g), and lower but comparable reabsorptive clearance (CLinl or CLinl{mi}) (3 and 4 ml/min/g) and efflux clearance (CLefb or CLefb{mi}) from the cell to the circulation (2.5 and 4 ml/min/g). However, at the brush border membrane, a higher secretory clearance (CLefl{mi}) was found for hippurate (38 ml/min/g) than for benzoate (CLefl or 10 ml/min/g). One could further surmise the roles of putative transporters. The recently cloned OAT-K1 transporter for methotrexate (Saito et al., 1996), however, does not seem to be involved. At the basolateral membrane, benzoate and hippurate may share the transporter for PAH (Russel et al., 1990), and this affinity may increase with increasing hydrophobicity and pKa (Ullrich and Rumrich, 1988). A sodium-independent organic anion transporter, ROAT1, which is capable of transporting PAH and urate (Sekine et al., 1997) and that is susceptible to inhibition by probenecid, glutarate, and alpha -ketoglutarate (Sweet et al., 1997), has recently been cloned, but it is unknown whether there is overlapping specificity for benzoate or hippurate with this transport system. By contrast, the involvement of the sodium-dependent lactate transporter for benzoate reabsorption has been suggested (Ullrich et al., 1982; Barbarat and Podevin, 1987). However, PAH (Kullack-Ublick et al., 1994), benzoate, and hippurate are not transported by oatp1, the organic anion transport polypeptide (Pang et al., 1998), which has been immunologically localized to exist on the apical (luminal) membrane of the rat kidney (Bergmann et al., 1996).

The optimized parameters for benzoate and hippurate transport at both the basolateral and brush border membranes and for metabolism of benzoate (Table 3) yielded close approximations of the observed urinary and venous output data (Fig. 2) and renal clearances of benzoate and extraction ratios of the formed and preformed hippurate (Table 1). The solutions further predicted that EK{pmi} would be more prone to changes in GFR, whereas the condition would not exist for EK{mi} (Table 2). This was indeed observed for the kinetics of the preformed [3H]hippurate during the early times of perfusion when GFR fluctuated markedly, but the effect was absent for formed hippurate which was excreted to a greater extent than preformed [3H]hippurate (Fig. 2).

Another remarkable observation was that the extraction ratio of formed [14C]hippurate, EK{mi} (0.39 ± 0.05) was higher than the renal extraction ratio of preformed [3H]hippurate (EK{pmi} = 0.24 ± 0.05) (p < .05). As a first impression, a ratio of EK{pmi}/EK{mi} of less than unity might be erroneously attributed to low influx of hippurate at the basolateral membrane. In fact, the difference between EK{pmi} and EK{mi} for given GFR, fu{mi} and QK values was reliant on the ratio of CLefb{mi} and CLefl{mi}. That EK{mi} could be greater than EK{pmi} is therefore not solely dependent on whether barrier-limited influx existed for the metabolite as previously envisioned (deLannoy et al., 1990).

Another interesting observation was the low FE value of benzoate [0.27 ± 0.19, or CLu,K/(fuGFR)] would ordinarily suggest net reabsorption of [14C]benzoate. However, recent examination of renal clearance concepts suggest that extensive intracellular metabolism could mask our ability to detect the net secretory flux of substrates across the basolateral and brush border membranes (Smith and Kugler, 1994; Sirianni and Pang, 1997). This might occur when renal metabolism reduces the FE from values above unity when metabolism is absent to values below unity in the presence of metabolism. Interestingly, when the metabolic intrinsic clearance of benzoate (40 ml/min/g) was set to zero, the FE value of benzoate was increased markedly (from 0.27 to 4.7). From the theoretical projection, the extensive intracellular metabolism of benzoate to hippurate had indeed masked our ability to detect the high secretory potential of the kidney for benzoate. By contrast, for the nonmetabolized substrate, [3H]hippurate, its FE value greatly exceeds unity, and the net handling mechanism is unmistakably due to secretion.

In summary, the renal elimination of [14C]benzoate and [3H]hippurate at tracer concentrations was studied simultaneously in the single pass IPK preparation. The renal extraction ratio of preformed [3H]hippuric acid was lower than the apparent extraction ratio of the renally formed [14C]hippurate. Based on analytical solutions provided upon solving mass balance rate equations obtained with a physiological model, the kinetic difference between formed and preformed hippurate was found to be due to the ratio of CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} for hippurate than on the influx clearance (CLinb{mi}) of the metabolite.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 18, 1998.

Received for publication September 29, 1997.

1 This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada (MA-9104).

Send reprint requests to: Dr. K. S. Pang, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2S2 E-mail: pang{at}phm.utoronto.ca.

    Abbreviations

IPK, isolated perfused rat kidney; CLtot, k{pmi}, urinary clearance for a preformed metabolite; CLtot,k{mi}, urinary clearance for a formed metabolite; PAH, p-aminohippurate; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; CIn, steady-state input concentration; COut, steady-state output plasma concentration; RBC, red blood cell; FE, fractional excretion.

    Appendix
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References

The mass balanced rate equations for the single-pass system physiological model (Fig. 1) are shown below.

For rate of benzoate disappearance in reservoir:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>Q<SUB>K</SUB><FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> (A1)
For rate of change of benzoate in kidney plasma:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>PK</SUB></NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>
=(Q<SUB>K</SUB>−<UP>GFRf<SUB>u</SUB></UP>)<FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR>−(Q<SUB>K</SUB>−Q<SUB>u</SUB>+<UP>f<SUB>u</SUB>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>)<FR><NU>A<SUB>PK</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>PK</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>f<SUB>K</SUB>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB><FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR> (A2)
For rate of change of benzoate in kidney:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>
=<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB><FR><NU>A<SUB>u</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR>−<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>(<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>+<UP>CL</UP><SUB>int,K</SUB>)<FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>f<SUB>u</SUB>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB><FR><NU>A<SUB>PK</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>PK</SUB></DE></FR>
For rate of change of benzoate in urine:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>u</SUB></NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>+Q<SUB>u</SUB>)<FR><NU>A<SUB>u</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB> <UP>f<SUB>K</SUB></UP><FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>GFRf<SUB>u</SUB></UP><FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> (A4)
For rate of change of formed hippurate in kidney plasma:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB><UP>PK</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR><UP> = f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR> (A5)
−[<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}+(Q<SUB>K</SUB>−Q<SUB>u</SUB>)]<FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>PK</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB><UP>PK</UP></SUB></DE></FR>
For rate of change of formed hippurate in kidney:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR> =<UP>CL</UP><SUB>int,K</SUB> <UP>f<SUB>K</SUB></UP><FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB></NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>} <FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>PK</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB><UP>PK</UP></SUB></DE></FR>−<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}(<UP>CL</UP><SUB>efl</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>} (A6)
+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR>
For rate of change of formed hippurate in urine:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>u</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>−(<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}+Q<SUB>u</SUB>)<FR><NU>A<SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR> (A7)
For rate of preformed hippurate disappearance in reservoir:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>R</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>Q<SUB>K</SUB><FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> (A8)
For rate of change of preformed hippurate in kidney plasma:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>PK</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=(Q<SUB>K</SUB>−<UP>GFRf</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>})<FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR> (A9)
−(Q<SUB>K</SUB>−Q<SUB>u</SUB>+<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>})<FR><NU>A<SUB>PK</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>PK</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>
For rate of change of preformed hippurate in kidney:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>u</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR> (A10)
−<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}(<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>CL</UP><SUP>b</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>PK</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>PK</SUB></DE></FR>
For rate of change of preformed hippurate in urine:
<FR><NU><UP>d</UP>A<SUB>u</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE><UP>dt</UP></DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>in</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}+Q<SUB>u</SUB>)<FR><NU>A<SUB>u</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>u</SUB></DE></FR> (A11)
+<UP>CL</UP><SUP>l</SUP><SUB>ef</SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<UP>f</UP><SUB><UP>K</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>K</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>K</SUB></DE></FR>+<UP>GFRf</UP><SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB>{<UP>mi</UP>}<FR><NU>A<SUB>R</SUB>{<UP>pmi</UP>}</NU><DE>V<SUB>R</SUB></DE></FR>
where AR, APK, AK, and Au, respectively, represent the amounts of parent drug (benzoate) in reservoir, kidney plasma, kidney tissue, and urine, respectively, AR{mi}, APK{mi}, AK{mi}, and Au{mi} are the corresponding amounts for the metabolite hippurate, with AR{pmi}, APK{pmi}, AK{pmi}, and Au{pmi} denoting those for the preformed hippurate; VR, VPK, VK, and Vu represent the renal plasma, tissue, and tubular urine volumes, respectively; QK and Qu denote renal arterial plasma and urine flow rates, respectively; fu, fK, fu{mi}, and fK{mi} are the unbound fractions of drug and metabolite in plasma and tissue respectively; CLinb/CLinb{mi}, CLefb/CLefb{mi}, CLinl/CLinl{mi}, and CLefl/CLefl{mi}, respectively, denote the influx and efflux clearances of drug or metabolite across the basolateral and luminal membranes.

The coefficients of eqs. A1 to A7 were placed as elements of a 7 × 7-square matrix. Upon inversion of the matrix (as shown for Sirianni and Pang, 1997), solutions for the amounts of drug (benzoate) and formed metabolite (hippurate) in output venous plasma and urine were obtained. These, upon division by their appropriate volumes, yielded the appropriate steady-state plasma venous and urinary concentrations. The equivalent equations (eqs. A8 to A11) were similarly treated for preformed hippurate.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Appendix
References