Faculty of Pharmacy (W.G., K.S.P.) and
Department of Pharmacology
(K.S.P.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
 |
Introduction |
The
kidney, a key organ for the maintenance of water and electrolyte
balance, is capable of synthesis, metabolism, and secretion of hormones
and is responsible for the excretion of drugs and synthetic compounds,
particularly biotransformation products that are usually of greater
polarity than the parent compounds (see recent review, Lohr et al.,
1998
). The kinetics of renal drug excretion are complex (Cummings et
al., 1967
, Garrett, 1978
): the free species undergoes glomerular
filtration and additional secretion results when substrate in the
postglomerular circulation enters the basolateral and then the brush
border (luminal) membranes into tubular urine, with the kinetic events
being complicated by reabsorption at the brush border membrane. The
scenario is complex because membrane transport processes at the
basolateral and brush border membranes operate in both directions and
are subject to local pH conditions that influence passive diffusion and
saturation behaviors of carrier proteins that effect facilitative transport (Garrett, 1978
; Levy, 1980
; Tucker, 1981
; Lohr et al., 1998
).
The kinetics involving metabolite formation and excretion in the kidney
are even more elaborate (Diamond and Quebbeman, 1981
; Tremaine et al.,
1984
; de Lannoy et al., 1990
). For the in vivo system in which
metabolite formed by the kidney is directly excreted into urine and
reenters the circulation, the apparent clearance of the formed
metabolite estimated by conventional methods (urinary clearance/midpoint concentration) is not constant and exceeds that for
the preformed metabolite (Wan and Riegelman, 1972
; de Lannoy et al.,
1989
, 1990
; de Lannoy and Pang, 1993
; Kugler et al., 1996
). In vivo,
has been suggested that the handling of a metabolite formed from drug
differs from that of the metabolite (preformed) administered to the
kidney (Garrett, 1978
), that the apparent renal clearance of the formed
metabolite exceeds the renal clearance of the metabolite given per se
as a preformed species, provided that the same transport processes are
involved in the handling of both the formed and preformed metabolites, and given that there is lack of reabsorption (efflux) of the
metabolite and absence of interaction between the parent drug and
metabolite (Tucker, 1981
).
Differentiation of the renal handling of formed and preformed
metabolite in a recirculating system or in vivo is difficult (de Lannoy
et al., 1990
). For this reason, the single-pass isolated perfused rat
kidney (IPK) preparation is ideal for distinguishing the fate of the
preformed versus formed metabolite in the kidney, when both precursor
and metabolite, labeled with different radiolabeled isotopes, are given
simultaneously at tracer concentrations to the IPK (de Lannoy et al.,
1989
). The single-pass IPK precludes recirculation of the venous
metabolite back to the kidney and allows for mass balance
considerations and quantitation of the kinetics in absence of added
organs. In this instance, one could postulate that because of
filtration of the preformed but not the formed metabolite species which
originates within the postglomerular region in situ the kidney that
precludes filtration, the urinary clearance
(CLtot,K{pmi}) for a preformed metabolite
that is solely excreted is greater in comparison to the apparent
clearance of the metabolite formed from its precursor
CLtot,K{mi}, unless a transport barrier for
entry of the metabolite exists (deLannoy et al., 1990
). Renal metabolic
studies on the comparative fates of the diacid metabolite
[14C]enalaprilat generated from
[14C]enalapril and preformed
[3H]enalaprilat in the single-pass isolated perfused rat
kidney preparation indeed showed that
CLtot,K{mi} > CLtot,K{pmi} (de Lannoy et al., 1989
). The
observation was explained by the existence of a transport barrier at
the basolateral membrane for the metabolite enalaprilat (de Lannoy et
al., 1990
) and was later confirmed with multiple indicator dilution
studies (Schwab et al., 1992
). Since renal metabolism and the
resulting toxicity of xenobiotics have been well recognized (Elfarra
and Anders, 1984
; Spry et al., 1985
; Stevens et al., 1988
; Monks et
al., 1990
), the circumstances and the determining factors surrounding
the renal clearance of the preformed metabolite that result in a
different apparent renal clearance of the formed metabolite need to be clarified.
The present study was designed to address these issues through
experimental and theoretical examinations. Experimentally, the handling
of a formed versus preformed metabolite was compared with benzoate and
hippurate in the single-pass IPK. Much is known about the
precursormetabolite pair. Hippurate is formed via the conjugation
of benzoate with glycine which occurs in the kidney (Wan and Riegelman,
1972
; Kao et al., 1978
; Poon and Pang, 1995
), although the reaction
also takes place in liver (Bridges et al., 1970
; Chiba et al., 1994
)
and in the intestine (Strahl and Barr, 1971
). Glycine conjugation is
catalyzed by benzoyl-Co A synthetase and benzoyl-Co A-glycine
N-acyltransferase in the matrix of mitochondria (Gatley and
Sherratt, 1977
). The inhibition of these two enzymes or the reduced
availability of Co A will also affect the hepatic glycine conjugation
(Amsel and Levy, 1969
; Gregus et al., 1992
, 1993
). The uptake of
hippurate across the basolateral membrane of the dog kidney was
saturable with a high Km (223 mM) (Knoefel and
Huang, 1959
; Russel et al., 1989
). The inhibitory constants of
hippurate on uptake of p-aminohippurate (PAH) were 4.8 and 11.6 mM in dog renal basolateral and brush border membrane vesicles, respectively (Russel and Vermeulen, 1994
). The precursor, benzoate, also inhibited the uptake of PAH in dog renal basolateral and brush
border membrane vesicles (Russel et al., 1991
) and repressed the
sodium-dependent reabsorption of lactate in the rat kidney (Ullrich et
al., 1982
; Ullrich and Rumich, 1988
).
Although concentration-dependent removal of benzoate was found in the
single-pass IPK preparation, the apparent extraction ratio of renally
formed hippurate was constant (0.48) among all concentrations (Poon and
Pang, 1995
). Yet the fate of preformed hippurate was not directly
investigated. In the present study, we compared the renal elimination
of [14C]hippurate formed from tracer
[14C]benzoate and of preformed
[3H]hippurate when [14C]benzoate and
[3H]hippurate were delivered simultaneously at tracer
concentrations to the single-pass IPK preparation to obtain paired
observations on the metabolites in the kidney. We explored, with the
use of a physiological model, the analytical solutions for the
clearances (or extraction ratio) of the drug and preformed metabolite,
and the apparent clearance (or extraction ratio) of the formed
metabolite species under linear conditions. With these solutions,
parameters pertaining to the transport of benzoate and hippurate and
the metabolite intrinsic clearances of benzoate were optimized for the
observed data. The solutions were also used to divulge the interrelationships among the transport clearances and metabolic intrinsic clearance on the kinetics of formed versus preformed metabolite species.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Source of Materials
[14C]Benzoic acid (specific activity, 16.0 mCi/mmol) was purchased from New England Nuclear Company (Boston, MA).
The radiochemical purity of [14C]benzoate was >99%, as
judged by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
[2-3H]Glycine that was used for the synthesis of
[3H]hippurate (38.8 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Dupont
(Boston, MA). All reagents used were of glass-distilled HPLC grade or
were of the highest purity available.
Synthesis of [3H]Hippurate
[3H]Hippurate was chemically synthesized from
benzoyl chloride and [3H]glycine according to the method
of Ingersoll and Babcock (1943)
. [3H]Glycine (0.026 µmol in 1 ml of 2% ethanolic water) was dried under nitrogen in a
test tube, and unlabeled glycine (4.97 µmol) and 6.25 µmol of
sodium hydroxide in 1 ml of distilled water were added and mixed. Then
10 µmol of NaOH (100 µl of 1 N NaOH) was added dropwise as the test
tube was thoroughly mixed and the speed of sodium hydroxide addition
affected the yield of the reaction. The reaction mixture was allowed to
stand at room temperature for 60 min before termination of the reaction
by placement in an ice bucket, and 400 µl of 0.1 N HCl was added. The
formed [3H]hippuric acid in the aqueous phase was
extracted into ether, which was transferred to a separate test tube and
dried under N2. The residue was reconstituted in water and
further purified by HPLC. After purification, the specific activity of
synthesized [3H]hippurate was 56 µCi/µmol, and the
radiochemical purity was >98% as judged by HPLC.
Kidney Perfusion
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, St. Constant, Quebec
City, Canada; 402 ± 11 g) were fed ad libitum and allowed
free access to water. The animals were housed in a room with a 12-h light/dark cycle. Isolated rat kidney perfusion was performed according
to Ross (1978)
and de Lannoy et al. (1989)
. Before surgery, the animals
were anesthetized by an i.p. administration of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg b.wt.). The surgical procedure and the perfusion apparatus were
identical to those described previously (Poon and Pang, 1995
). The
perfusate, consisting of 20% washed bovine red blood cells
(Ryding-Meat Packer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada), 4% bovine serum
albumin (Fraction V; Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO), 5 mM glucose,
and a complement of 20 amino acids in Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate
solution buffered to pH 7.4 was oxygenated with 95% oxygen-5% carbon
dioxide (Matheson Gas, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Unlabeled inulin
(50 µM) was added to the perfusate in reservoir, and its clearance
was used for estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The
kidney was first equilibrated under constant perfusion pressure
(approximately 90 mm Hg) for 20 min and then the perfusion was
continued under constant perfusate flow rate (8 ml/min) for the
remainder of the experiment (50 min). During the entire experiment,
urine was collected into preweighed microfuge tubes at 5-min intervals.
The volume of urine was measured gravimetrically, with the assumption
that the specific gravity is unity. Three samples were taken from the
reservoir at 7.5, 27.5, and 47.5 min postequilibration to determine the
steady-state input concentration (CIn), whereas the outflow
perfusate was sampled at the midpoint of each of the 5-min intervals
(2.5, 7.5, 12.5, 17.5, 22.5, 27.5, 32.5, 37.5, 42.5, and 47.5 min); the
data obtained for the last five samples were averaged to provide the
steady-state output plasma concentration (COut).
Red Blood Cell Distribution and Protein Binding of
[3H]Hippurate
Blank blood perfusate (4% albumin) containing 40% of washed
bovine red blood cells (RBCs) (v/v) was diluted with plasma perfusate containing [3H]hippurate to result in 20% RBC blood
perfusate. [14C]Sucrose, a reference that does not enter
into the red blood cell, was also included. After admixture, samples
were incubated at 37°C and duplicate samples were taken at various
times up to 3 h. The radioactivities of
[3H]hippurate and [14C]sucrose in plasma
before and after dilution were assayed using the liquid scintillation
counter (model LS 5801; Beckman Instruments, Beckman Canada,
Mississauga, Canada); the hematocrit of each sample was determined by a
hematocrit centrifuge (Microfuge B; Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto,
CA). The concentration ratio of [3H]hippurate in RBC
water to the unbound [3H]hippurate in plasma water,
HA, was estimated as a ratio of the activities in RBC
water and plasma water:
|
(1)
|
where cr and cp
are the total (bound and unbound) concentrations of
[3H]hippurate in RBC and plasma, respectively,
fr and fp are the fractions of RBCs and plasma which are water (0.70 and 0.94 for 4%
albumin), respectively, and fu is the unbound
fraction in plasma. Since the resulting plasma concentrations for the
sucrose tracer (c*suc) and the tracer
hippurate (c*p) after admixture are
related to the original amounts of added sucrose and hippurate
radioactivity, R*suc and
R*HA, respectively, and the newly
diluted volume (V) and hematocrit (Hct) these concentrations,
c*suc and
c*p, are expressed as:
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
where
is the volume ratio of RBC water to plasma water,
|
(4)
|
Division of eq. 2 by eq. 3 and further
substitution of
HA (eq. 1) and
(eq. 4) result in the
following (Pang et al., 1995
),
|
(5)
|
Since
(c*suc/c*p),
,
(R*suc/R*HA),
and fu are known,
HA is readily
estimated from eq. 5.
The corresponding plasma samples containing the tracer
[3H]hippurate were used for the determination of the
unbound fraction (fu) by ultrafiltration
(Centricon Amicon, Beverly, MA; 10,000 molecular weight cutoff).
The samples were centrifuged at 1000g for 20 min at room
temperature. The unbound fraction in plasma was estimated as the ratio
of the disintegrations per minute (dpm) of [3H]hippurate
in the ultrafiltrate (unbound) to that in original plasma (total).
Analytical Methods
Viability.
Perfusate and urine samples were analyzed for
sodium, potassium, glucose, and inulin. Sodium and potassium were
determined by flame photometry (IL 943 Flame Photometer;
Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA). Glucose was assayed by the
oxygen rate method (Glucose Analyzer 2; Beckman Instruments, Inc.,
Fullerton, CA). The percentage of reabsorbed sodium and glucose were
used as indices for the reabsorptive function of the isolated IPK. Inulin in urine and plasma was determined using the UV method of
Heyrovsky (1956)
at 550 nm.
Drug and Metabolite Assays.
[14C]Benzoic acid,
formed [14C]hippurate, and preformed
[3H]hippurate in urine and plasma were separated by a
HPLC method with UV detection of methoxybenzoic acid, the internal
standard (Chiba et al., 1994
). The radiolabeled compounds eluted from
the HPLC system were collected at predetermined collection intervals.
Quantification was performed with calibration curves constructed with
varying amounts of radioactive [14C]benzoate and
[3H]hippurate added to plasma and urine.
Calculations.
The plasma clearance of inulin was used as an
estimate of GFR, and the value was normalized to the weight of the
unperfused left kidney. The percentage of reabsorption of sodium and
glucose was calculated as: [(filtered load
excreted
load)/filtered load] × 100%.
The urinary excretory clearance (CLu,K) is the
ratio of the excretion rate (product of the drug urinary concentration, Cu, and the urinary flow rate, Qu, and the
steady-state input plasma concentration, CIn. The
fractional excretion (FE) is the unbound urinary clearance
(CLu,K/fu) normalized to GFR which
was defined by the renal clearance of inulin. The total renal clearance
(CLtot,K), which encompasses the components of
filtration, secretion, reabsorption, and metabolism at steady-state, is
given as the product of renal steady-state extraction ratio of benzoate
(EK) and renal plasma flow
(QK),
|
(6)
|
Similarly, the product of the renal steady-state extraction
ratio of [3H]hippurate,
EK{pmi}, and the plasma flow rate
(QK) yields the renal clearance of hippurate.
Since the plasma flow rate is effectively reduced by the urine flow
rate (Qu) due to filtration/reabsorption of
water, EK is expressed as the difference between
the steady-state input rate and output rate divided by the input rate;
CIn and COut are the steady-state input and
output plasmas concentrations of drug:
|
(7)
|
The same relationship holds for the extraction ratio of the
preformed metabolite EK{pmi}.
Since removal of the formed [14C]hippurate
is solely by excretion, the apparent extraction ratio of the formed
hippurate, EK{mi}, was expressed as:
|
(8)
|
where COut{mi} is the steady state output
concentration of the found metabolite. Data obtained at steady-state
were expressed as the mean ± S.D. and were compared with use of
Student's paired t test. The difference was viewed as
significant when p < .05.
Physiological Modeling.
The handling of benzoate and
hippurate by the kidney was examined with a physiological model similar
to that used previously (Hekman and van Ginneken, 1982
; deLannoy et
al., 1990
; Sirianni and Pang, 1998
). In this model, tubular
reabsorption of water (from lumen into plasma of peritubular
circulation) was not taken into consideration in mass transfer
relationships. The kidney is subdivided into three distinct
compartments: the vascular (plasma), tissue (tubular cell), and urine
(tubular lumen) compartments (Fig. 1).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Physiological models for renal elimination of a
substrate that is both metabolized and excreted by kidney as the only
eliminating organ. The kidney is divided into three compartments:
plasma, tissue, and urine. The outflow plasma does not recirculate to
the reservoir in the single-pass system. The amount of drug in
reservoir (AR) entering the kidney plasma
(APK) is first filtered, and only that in the
postglomerular circulation reaches the renal tubular cells. Exchange of
drug between renal plasma and tissue is characterized by influx
(CLinb) and efflux
(CLefb) clearances across the renal
basolateral (b) membrane, and the exchange between urine and
tissue is characterized by CLinl and
CLefl at the luminal (l)
membrane. Drug within the kidney tissue (AK) is
metabolized with a renal metabolic intrinsic clearance,
CLint,K. Urinary excretion of drug is a function
of urine flow (Qu) and the net transfer
clearances at both basolateral and luminal membranes. See
Appendix for the definition of the terms. Parameters
associated with the metabolite are further qualified by {mi}, and
mass transfer for the preformed metabolite was not shown. See
Appendix for the definition of other parameters.
|
|
Only linear conditions are considered since tracer concentrations were
used in the present study. The mass balance differential equations and
the definition of terms which describe the rates of change of drug
(benzoic acid) and metabolite [preformed {pmi} and renally formed
{mi} hippurate] between the renal compartments during single-pass
perfusion are summarized in the Appendix. Upon presenting
the coefficients as elements in a 7 × 7 matrix, inversion of the
resulting square matrix on the POWERMac (Theorist; Prescience, San
Francisco, CA) furnished solutions for the amounts of drug and formed
metabolite in renal plasma (PK) and urine (u) at steady-state; Upon
division by the respective volume terms, these in turn provided the
concentrations of drug and formed metabolites in each compartment. Likewise, inversion of the 4 × 4-square matrix based on
coefficients from equations for preformed hippurate yielded solutions
pertaining to the preformed metabolite.
The analytical solutions provided the basis for exploration of the
sensitivity of the extraction ratios, EK,
EK{mi}, EK{pmi},
and the urinary and renal clearances toward changes in the transport
clearances at the basolateral and brush border membranes of the kidney.
Moreover, the transport and metabolic intrinsic clearance values were
optimized to provide predicted EK values and
clearances that matched closely with the observations; the unbound
fractions of drug and metabolite in renal tissue were assumed to equal
those in plasma. Simulations were then performed with the optimized
parameters to explore the dependency of the
EK{mi} and
EK{pmi} on drug transport and metabolic
parameters, GFR, the unbound fractions, and the transport parameters
for the metabolite.
 |
Results |
Protein Binding and RBC Distribution of [3H]Hippurate
The unbound fraction of [3H]hippurate in plasma
(fu{mi}) determined by ultrafiltration at
25°C was 0.48 and was not expected to change dramatically at 37°C
due to the low extent of binding. The blood/plasma concentration ratio
of [3H]hippurate was 0.84 ± 0.02 (n = 10), which was almost identical with the value of [1
hematocrit] (0.86 ± 0.01) in the same samples (p > .05); the RBC/plasma water distribution ratio (
HA)
was zero. The blood/plasma ratio of [14C]sucrose in the
same sample was 0.86 ± 0.02 and was not different from [1
hematocrit]. These observations suggest that hippurate was not
distributed into RBCs, as reported elsewhere (Yoshimura et al., 1998
).
Isolated Rat Kidney Perfusion (IPK)
Viability of the IPK.
Glucose reabsorption of the IPK during
the steady-state (35-50 min) single-pass perfusion was 95 ± 4%
(mean ± S.D. of five preparations), whereas that for sodium
reabsorption was lower (73 ± 11%). The GFR and the urinary flow
rate were 0.34 ± 0.09 and 0.11 ± 0.05 ml/min/g,
respectively (Table 1). The increase in
weight of the perfused right kidney (1.85 ± 0.08 g) to that of the unperfused left kidney (1.54 ± 0.1 g) was only
20 ± 5%. These indices on viability were generally similar to
those reported previously for the single-pass rat kidney perfused under
constant flow (deLannoy et al., 1989
; Poon and Pang, 1995
).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Renal handling of tracer concentrations of [14C]benzoate and
[3H]hippurate by the constant flow (8 ml/min) single-pass
IPKa
|
|
Elimination of [14C]Benzoate,
[14C]Hippurate, and [3H]Hippurate.
Steady-state was readily attained in the rat IPK perfused in a
single-pass fashion with tracer [14C]benzoate
(30,200 ± 4,100 dpm/ml or 0.86 ± 0.12 µM), shown by the
constancy in the output rates of [14C]benzoate and
[14C]hippurate in venous plasma and urine (Fig.
2A). The steady-state extraction ratio of
[14C]benzoic acid was 0.26 ± 0.04 (mean ± S.D., n = 5, Table 1). However, the urinary clearance
of unchanged benzoic acid was very small and variable (0.011 ± 0.01 ml/min/g) with an FE value of 0.27 ± 0.19, and 99% of the
renal clearance (1.13 ± 0.17 ml/min/g) was attributed to the
metabolic clearance (1.12 ± 0.17 ml/min/g) for glycine
conjugation in the formation of [14C]hippurate. These
values agreed with those previously obtained for benzoate given at
tracer concentrations to the rat IPK (Poon and Pang, 1995
). Almost half
of the formed [14C]hippurate was excreted immediately
into urine, and the apparent extraction ratio or
EK{mi} was 0.39 ± 0.09. The ratio of
the apparent renal clearance of [14C]hippurate
(EK{mi}QK) to
fu{mi} GFR was 11.3 ± 3.3.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The observed output rates of
[14C]benzoate (BA) and [14C]hippurate (HA)
in venous plasma and urine, after single-pass delivery of
[14C]benzoate to the constant flow IPK (8 ml/min) (A),
and those for the simultaneously perfused [3H]hippurate
(B) were plotted versus the postequilibration perfusion time. The lines
were simulated data based on predictions afforded by the optimized
parameters shown in Table 3 and the rate equations shown in the
Appendix.
|
|
Steady-state was also reached for the preformed metabolite,
[3H]hippurate (44,000 ± 5,400 dpm/ml or 0.35 ± 0.04 µM) that was administered simultaneously with
[14C]benzoate. This was shown by the constancy in the
levels of [3H]hippurate in both venous plasma and urine
(Fig. 2B). The renal steady-state extraction ratio of preformed
hippurate (EK{pmi} = 0.24 ± 0.05) was,
however, lower than the value of EK{mi} (p < .05); its value was not close to unity as
expected for other species (Przedlacki et al., 1968
; Shames and
Korobkin 1976
; Spustová et al., 1991
). The renal clearance of
[3H]hippurate in IPK was 1.1 ± 0.2 ml/min/g; the
average FE value was 7.7 ± 1.0 times that of the GFR (Table 1).
There was a greater fluctuation existing in the levels of preformed
[3H]hippurate in plasma and urine in comparison to
those bearing the [14C] label originating from
[14C]benzoate, which was not excreted much, and formed
[14C]hippurate which was excreted to a greater extent
than preformed [3H]hippurate.
Physiological Modeling
The mass transfer rate equations pertaining to drug and metabolite
and to the preformed hippurate are summarized in the
Appendix. Inversion of the resulting matrices for benzoate
and formed hippurate and for preformed hippurate yielded analytical
solutions for the steady-state output concentrations of drug and
formed/preformed metabolite in venous plasma and urine. These in turn
were substituted into eqs. 6 to 8 to provide the total renal and
urinary clearance of benzoate, and the extraction ratios of the formed
and preformed hippurate (Table 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Solved equations for renal physiological model, when renal metabolism
and excretion occur for the precursor and excretion occurs for the
metabolite
|
|
The analytical solution of EK{mi}, solved
for the first time, provided the needed comparison with
EK{pmi} (Table 2). It was found that GFR and
parameters associated with the precursor were absent in the solution
for the formed metabolite, EK{mi}, i.e., the
extent of excretion of formed hippurate was dependent only on its
unbound fraction in plasma and influx and efflux clearances across the
renal basolateral and brush border membranes, its unbound fraction, and
the plasma and urinary flow rates. In comparison, the extraction ratio
for preformed hippurate, EK{pmi}, was
additionally dependent on the GFR. The difference between
EK{pmi} and
EK{mi} became zero when CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} = (QK
fu{mi}GFR)/(fu{mi}GFR)
(see Table 2) or 26.089 after substitution of the experimentally
observed values of QK, fu{mi},
and GFR into the relationship. At
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} > 26.089, EK{pmi} exceeds
EK{mi}, whereas when
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} < 26.089, EK{mi} exceeds
EK{pmi}. The ratio of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi}
was described by a relation in which the drug transport and metabolic
parameters and the reabsorption clearance of mi
(CLinl{mi}) were absent (Table 2).
Simulations.
The values of the volumes of renal plasma, renal
tissue, and tubular urine used for simulation were similar to those
previously reported (Table 3), whereas
the flow rates and unbound fractions were experimentally determined;
CLint,K was set as 40 ml/min/g, a value similar
to the ratio Vmax/Km or
195 nmol/min/g/5.3 µM reported for the glycination of benzoate in the
IPK (Poon and Pang, 1995
). The solutions in Table 2 were used to
provide optimized parameter of CLinb,
CLefb, CLinl,
CLefl, CLint,K,
CLinb{mi},
CLefb{mi},
CLinl{mi}, or
CLefl{mi}. Formulations of the
clearances of drug and formed and preformed metabolites (Table 2) were
placed in mathematical worksheets (Excel, version 5; Microsoft,
Seattle, WA), and each parameter was varied individually to examine the
range of values that would yield predicted values that closely matched
the observations. The optimized parameters are summarized in Table 3.
The appropriateness of these parameters were shown by the ability of
the parameters to provide closely matching urinary venous plasma output
rates of benzoate and formed hippurate (Fig. 2A) and of preformed
hippurate (Fig. 2B), and clearances and extraction ratios values for
benzoate and formed and preformed hippurate similar to those observed
(Table 1). The ratio of
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi}
was 4:38 or 0.11, a value much less than 26.089, and was consistent
with the view that EK{pmi} < EK{mi}.
Changes in EK{pmi},
EK{mi}, and the ratio,
EK{pmi}/EK{mi}
are simulated with the set of parameters shown in Table 3. The
influence of CLinb{mi},
CLefb{mi},
CLinl{mi}, and
CLefl{mi} on
EK{pmi} and
EK{mi} was generally similar, although
values for EK{pmi} were lower than those for EK{mi} for the same given
CLefb{mi},
CLinl{mi}, and
CLefl{mi} values used for simulation
(data not shown). The difference was better displayed in the ratio,
EK{pmi}/EK{mi} versus changes in
CLefl{mi}/CLefb{mi}
and CLinl{mi}, or
CLinb{mi} (Fig.
3). For the given set of values of GFR,
plasma and urinary flow rates, and unbound fraction of hippurate, the
ratio of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi}
was unity when the efflux clearances at the basolateral/brush border
membranes
(CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi})
approximated 26.089, in which case the ratio became insensitive to
changes in the influx clearance of hippurate
CLinl{mi}. At other times when
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} > 26.089, values for
EK{pmi}/EK{mi}
exceeded unity, and increasing values of the influx metabolite
clearance CLinb{mi} decreased the values
of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi}. At
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi} < 26.089, however, ratios of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi} remained below unity, and these tended to increase toward unity with
increasing influx clearance CLinb{mi}
(Fig. 3A). The ratio,
EK{pmi}/EK{mi},
was independent of values of the reabsorptive clearance at the luminal membrane (CLinl{mi}) (Fig. 3B) and was
not very sensitive to small changes in GFR (data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Simulated ratios of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi},
based on analytical solutions and parameter values outlined in Tables 2
and 3, are plotted against ratios of
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi}
and the influx clearance at the basolateral membrane
CLinb{mi} (A) or the reabsorption
clearance at the luminal membrane,
CLinl{mi} (B). The value of
CLefl{mi} was fixed (38 ml/min/g)
whereas that for CLefb{mi} was varied.
The parameters varied are shown on the x- and
y-axes.
|
|
Nonlinear fitting of the data with equations in the
Appendix, with the optimized values (Table 3) as initial
estimates failed to provide good fits. The reabsorption clearances for
drug and metabolite became negative numbers. The underlying reason may be due to a relative large number of parameters for estimation and the
relative few data points (steady-state data became time invariant).
 |
Discussion |
The single-pass IPK preparation is an ideal model to examine the
dynamic interplay of filtration, metabolism, reabsorption, and
secretion of the kidney, and to obtain comparative data on formed
metabolite and preformed metabolite kinetics with differentially labeled precursor and preformed metabolite. In parallel, examination with the physiological model provided the theoretical basis on the
kinetic behaviors expected of the observed data. The premise of the
comparative kinetics and the analytical solutions was based on the lack
of interaction between benzoate and preformed hippurate, as well as
between the formed and preformed hippurate, and preservation of
linearity of the system. The total, metabolic, and urinary clearances
and FE value of benzoate (Table 1) were similar to those observed
previously when the low benzoate concentration was given alone (Poon
and Pang, 1995
). The apparent renal clearance of formed
hippurate that coexisted with tracer preformed
[3H]hippurate in the present study (11.0 ± 3.3) was
not different (p > .05) from the apparent renal
clearance of hippurate formed from benzoate (9.4 ± 3.6) in
previous IPK studies (Poon and Pang, 1995
). With these indices for
benzoate and hippurate remaining constant, we concluded that the
experimental condition of using only tracer concentrations of
[3H]hippurate and [14C]benzoate (micromolar
range) is devoid of interactions, thus preserving linearity of the
system and justifying use of linear algebra for arriving at the
analytical solutions. The view is likely correct since the
Km values (millimolar) for transport are high.
The theoretical examination had advanced our understanding of the
difference in kinetics between the formed and preformed metabolite in
the kidney (Table 2). The theory is based only on the linearity of the
system and is not predicated on the lack of efflux of metabolite back
to the circulation or lack of reabsorption of the metabolite, as
previously suggested (Garrett, 1978
; Tucker, 1981
). With these
formulations on hand, optimized parameters for benzoate and hippurate
transport are readily found (Table 3). These represent reasonably high
influx clearances across the basolateral membrane for benzoate and
hippurate (13 and 14 ml/min/g), and lower but comparable reabsorptive
clearance (CLinl or
CLinl{mi}) (3 and 4 ml/min/g) and efflux
clearance (CLefb or
CLefb{mi}) from the cell to the
circulation (2.5 and 4 ml/min/g). However, at the brush border
membrane, a higher secretory clearance
(CLefl{mi}) was found for hippurate (38 ml/min/g) than for benzoate (CLefl or 10 ml/min/g). One could further surmise the roles of putative transporters. The recently cloned OAT-K1 transporter for methotrexate (Saito et al., 1996
), however, does not seem to be involved. At the
basolateral membrane, benzoate and hippurate may share the transporter
for PAH (Russel et al., 1990
), and this affinity may increase with
increasing hydrophobicity and pKa (Ullrich and Rumrich, 1988
). A
sodium-independent organic anion transporter, ROAT1, which is capable
of transporting PAH and urate (Sekine et al., 1997
) and that is
susceptible to inhibition by probenecid, glutarate, and
-ketoglutarate (Sweet et al., 1997
), has recently been cloned, but
it is unknown whether there is overlapping specificity for benzoate or
hippurate with this transport system. By contrast, the involvement of
the sodium-dependent lactate transporter for benzoate reabsorption has
been suggested (Ullrich et al., 1982
; Barbarat and Podevin, 1987
).
However, PAH (Kullack-Ublick et al., 1994
), benzoate, and hippurate are
not transported by oatp1, the organic anion transport polypeptide (Pang
et al., 1998
), which has been immunologically localized to exist on the
apical (luminal) membrane of the rat kidney (Bergmann et al., 1996
).
The optimized parameters for benzoate and hippurate transport at
both the basolateral and brush border membranes and for metabolism of
benzoate (Table 3) yielded close approximations of the observed urinary
and venous output data (Fig. 2) and renal clearances of benzoate and
extraction ratios of the formed and preformed hippurate (Table 1). The
solutions further predicted that EK{pmi} would be more prone to changes in GFR, whereas the condition would not
exist for EK{mi} (Table 2). This was indeed
observed for the kinetics of the preformed [3H]hippurate
during the early times of perfusion when GFR fluctuated markedly, but
the effect was absent for formed hippurate which was excreted to a
greater extent than preformed [3H]hippurate (Fig. 2).
Another remarkable observation was that the extraction ratio of
formed [14C]hippurate, EK{mi}
(0.39 ± 0.05) was higher than the renal extraction ratio of
preformed [3H]hippurate
(EK{pmi} = 0.24 ± 0.05)
(p < .05). As a first impression, a ratio of
EK{pmi}/EK{mi} of
less than unity might be erroneously attributed to low influx of
hippurate at the basolateral membrane. In fact, the difference between
EK{pmi} and
EK{mi} for given GFR,
fu{mi} and QK values was reliant on the ratio of CLefb{mi}
and CLefl{mi}. That
EK{mi} could be greater than
EK{pmi} is therefore not solely dependent on
whether barrier-limited influx existed for the metabolite as previously
envisioned (deLannoy et al., 1990
).
Another interesting observation was the low FE value of benzoate
[0.27 ± 0.19, or
CLu,K/(fuGFR)] would ordinarily suggest net reabsorption of [14C]benzoate. However,
recent examination of renal clearance concepts suggest that extensive
intracellular metabolism could mask our ability to detect the net
secretory flux of substrates across the basolateral and brush border
membranes (Smith and Kugler, 1994
; Sirianni and Pang, 1997
). This might
occur when renal metabolism reduces the FE from values above unity when
metabolism is absent to values below unity in the presence of
metabolism. Interestingly, when the metabolic intrinsic clearance of
benzoate (40 ml/min/g) was set to zero, the FE value of benzoate was
increased markedly (from 0.27 to 4.7). From the theoretical projection,
the extensive intracellular metabolism of benzoate to hippurate had
indeed masked our ability to detect the high secretory potential of the
kidney for benzoate. By contrast, for the nonmetabolized substrate,
[3H]hippurate, its FE value greatly exceeds unity, and
the net handling mechanism is unmistakably due to secretion.
In summary, the renal elimination of [14C]benzoate and
[3H]hippurate at tracer concentrations was studied
simultaneously in the single pass IPK preparation. The renal extraction
ratio of preformed [3H]hippuric acid was lower than the
apparent extraction ratio of the renally formed
[14C]hippurate. Based on analytical solutions provided
upon solving mass balance rate equations obtained with a physiological
model, the kinetic difference between formed and preformed hippurate was found to be due to the ratio of
CLefb{mi}/CLefl{mi}
for hippurate than on the influx clearance
(CLinb{mi}) of the metabolite.
Accepted for publication August 18, 1998.
Received for publication September 29, 1997.
The mass balanced rate equations for the single-pass system
physiological model (Fig. 1) are shown below.