JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lindstrom, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anand, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lindstrom, J.

Vol. 287, Issue 2, 469-479, November 1998

Determinants of Channel Gating Located in the N-Terminal Extracellular Domain of Nicotinic alpha 7 Receptor1

René Anand, Mark E. Nelson, Volodymyr Gerzanich, Gregg B. Wells and Jon Lindstrom

Neuroscience Center of Excellence and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 (R.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, MTSF, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (V.G.); and Department of Neuroscience (M.E.N., J.L.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (G.B.W.), University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6074


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We identified regions within the N-terminal extracellular domain of alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that affect channel gating. By single-channel analysis of alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors currents, we show that the difference in efficacy between the two agonists acetylcholine and 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (DMPP) is due to a slower channel activation rate by DMPP. The partial efficacy of DMPP was not caused by channel block or faster desensitization of alpha 7 AChRs by DMPP. In addition, the efficacy and, by inference, the activation rate were found to be voltage dependent. Using chimeras of the two closely related subunits alpha 7 and alpha 8, we map residues that affect channel activation rate and agonist affinity to two different regions of the extracellular domain. Residues that affect channel activation rate are within the sequence 1-179, whereas residues that affect agonist affinity are within the sequence 180-208.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

A menagerie of neuronal AChR subunit cDNAs termed alpha 2- alpha 9 and beta 2-beta 4 have been identified (Lindstrom et al., 1996; Papke, 1993; Role and Berg, 1996; Sargent, 1993). Sequence analysis revealed that they are members of a larger gene superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels whose members include the GABAA, glycine and 5-HT3 receptors (Barnard, 1992; Betz, 1990). In the AChR family, alpha 7, alpha 8 and alpha 9 subunits form functional homomers when expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Couturier et al., 1990; Elgoyhen et al., 1994; Gerzanich et al., 1994; Schoepfer et al., 1990). Other AChR subtypes require coexpression of at least pairs of alpha  and beta  subunits to form functional AChRs. Numerous investigators have exploited the inherent structural homogeneity of homomeric alpha 7 AChRs to understand the molecular determinants of AChR properties such as desensitization (Revah et al., 1991), ligand affinity (Corringer et al., 1995; Galzi et al., 1991), ion selectivity (Galzi et al., 1992) and modulation by extracellular Ca++ binding (Galzi et al., 1996), as well as to demonstrate the extensive structural similarities between members of the gene superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels (Eisele et al., 1993).

We have taken advantage of the structural homogeneity of the closely related homomeric alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs, in conjunction with their pharmacological differences, to identify regions of the N-terminal extracellular domain that affect activation of these AChRs. Previously, we have shown that ACh exhibits significantly lower potency (EC50) and DMPP exhibits dramatically lower efficacy for activation of alpha 7 AChRs compared with activation of alpha 8 AChRs (Gerzanich et al., 1994). In this report, we establish the kinetic basis for the partial efficacy of DMPP on alpha 7 AChRs. Single-channel analysis of alpha 7 AChR activity shows that the partial efficacy of DMPP is due to a slower rate of activation by DMPP compared with ACh. In contrast, the rates of desensitization, mean open times and conductances are not significantly different for alpha 7 channels activated by these two agonists. The functional properties of AChRs expressed from chimeras of subunits alpha 7 and alpha 8 have been used to identify regions that are responsible for the pharmacological differences observed between their cognate AChRs. The region 1-179 is responsible for the differences in efficacy of DMPP, whereas the region 180-208 is responsible for the differences in EC50 values for activation by ACh and DMPP. DMPP competes with ACh for activation of alpha 7 AChRs. The efficacy of DMPP is voltage dependent due to voltage dependence of the channel activation rate and not due to channel block. Collectively, our results demonstrate that regions within the N-terminal extracellular domain of alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs (and possibly other ligand-gated channels) govern not only the affinity for agonists but also the transition rates between closed and open states.

    Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mutants and chimeras. All site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the Altered Sites II in vitro Mutagenesis System (Promega, Madison, WI). The alpha 7(1-115)/alpha 8 chimera was constructed by introducing a BamHI site in the alpha 7 cDNA at a position analogous to the BamHI site in the alpha 8 cDNA. Then, a HindIII/BamHI DNA fragment corresponding to residues 1-115 of the alpha 7 subunit was used to replace the HindIII/BamHI fragment corresponding to residues 1-115 of the alpha 8 subunit. The chimera alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 was constructed by first introducing an EcoRI site in the alpha 8 cDNA at a position analogous to the EcoRI site in the alpha 7 cDNA. Then, a HindIII/EcoRI fragment corresponding to residues 1-179 of the alpha 7 subunit was used to replace the HindIII/EcoRI fragment corresponding to residues 1-179 of the alpha 8 subunit. The chimera alpha 7(1-208)/alpha 8 was constructed by a three-way ligation involving a HindIII/EcoRV fragment corresponding to residues 1-197 of the alpha 7 subunit, an EcoRV/HgaI double-stranded synthetic DNA cassette encoding residues 198-208 and a HgaI/BstEII fragment corresponding to residues 209-481 of the alpha 8 subunit. The chimera alpha 8(1-114)/alpha 7(115-179)/alpha 8(180-208)/alpha 8 was constructed by a three-way ligation involving a HindIII/BamHI fragment corresponding to residues 1-114 of the alpha 8 subunit, a BamHI/EcoRI fragment corresponding to residues 115-179 of the alpha 7 subunit and an EcoRI/BstEII fragment corresponding to residues 180-481 of the alpha 8 subunit. The DNA sequence integrity of all mutant and chimera constructs was verified by standard dideoxy sequencing.

Expression in oocytes. cRNA from linearized cDNA templates was synthesized in vitro using SP6 RNA polymerase in conjunction with reagents from the mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Oocytes were prepared for injection as previously described (Wang et al., 1996). Oocytes were injected with 50 to 100 ng of RNA per oocyte and incubated at 18°C in saline solution with (in mM): NaCl, 96; KCl, 2; MgCl2, 1; CaCl2, 1.8; HEPES, 5; pH 7.6.

Oocyte electrophysiology. Currents were measured using a standard two-microelectrode voltage-clamp amplifier (oocyte clamp OC-725; Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT) as previously described (Gerzanich et al., 1995). Electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had resistances of 0.5 to 1.0 MOmega for the current electrode and 1 to 2 MOmega for the voltage electrode. All records were digitized (MacLab/2e interface; AD Instruments) and stored on an Apple Macintosh IIcx computer and were analyzed using SCOPE (AD Instruments, Castle Hill, Australia) and Axograph software (Axon Instruments). Data were analyzed using KALEIDAGRAPH (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). The recording chamber was continually perfused at a flow rate of 10 ml/min with saline solution. Application of drugs was performed using a set of eight glass tubes (internal diameter, 2 mm) ending in the bath 3 mm from the oocyte and connected to 10-ml syringes, which were placed 10 cm above the recording chamber. Manual clamping and unclamping of the flexible tube connecting the syringe to the perfusion glass tube directed at the oocytes were used to control the flow of drugs. The delay between the application of the drugs and the appearance of a response was typically 250 to 300 msec, corresponding to the time needed for the drugs to reach the oocyte. At negative holding potentials, the Ca++ influx due to the activation of alpha 7 AChRs and alpha 8 AChRs by cholinergic agonists typically leads to the activation of endogenous Ca++-dependent Cl- channels, which may be responsible for some of the shoulder currents observed in our recordings. In all the experiments described in this report, we did not prevent the activation of these Ca++-dependent Cl- channels because we have previously shown that agonist EC50 values for activation of alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs do not significantly change under conditions in which the currents from Ca++ dependent Cl- channels are minimized (Devillers-Thiery et al., 1992; Gerzanich et al., 1994) (i.e., in the presence of BAPTA AM or at holding potentials of ~-20 mV, which is close to the reversal potentials for the Cl- channels in oocytes).

Data analysis. Concentration-response curves were obtained by measuring the response to increasing concentrations of agonists. Only oocytes that gave reproducible responses to a fixed concentration of 1 mM ACh before and after the test doses were used for further analysis. The expression levels of the AChRs were found to vary over the year and even between oocytes obtained from the same animal. Hence, the holding potentials were varied from -30 to -70 mV to obtain responses suitable for analysis. However, the agonist EC50 values for any given AChR did not change significantly as a function of the holding potential at which the experiment was done. The currents elicited by DMPP were always normalized to currents elicited by saturating concentrations of ACh on the same oocyte. The concentration-response curves were fitted to the Hill equation. All concentration-response curves shown are the mean of values obtained from at least three different oocytes.

Single-channel recordings. Xenopus oocytes were manually stripped of the vitelline membrane after osmotic shrinking with a 200 mM potassium aspartate solution (Methfessel et al., 1986). Outside-out configuration patches (Hamill et al., 1981) were formed from stripped oocytes expressing recombinant chicken alpha 7 AChRs from cRNAs that were injected cytosolically at least 4 days earlier. Single-channel currents were activated in patches by a 200-msec application of ACh flowing from one barrel of a two-barrel glass capillary tubing attached to a piezoelectric bimorph application system that was activated by an isolated pulse stimulator (either an A-M Systems model 2100 or Grass Medical Instruments models SD9 or S48-B). Before application of agonist, the patch was isolated in a continuously flowing control solution from the other barrel. Agonists were selected among by a six-way valve. The speed of solution exchange was determined by clamping an open recording electrode at 0 mV and then measuring the change in the solution junction potential when moving from a normal recording solution to one that had been diluted 5-fold with deionized water. The time constant for the change in clamping current during the solution exchange was ~1 msec. To test the system for variability of solution flow rate, the delay between applicator activation and onset of the junction potential change was measured. The onset of the change occurred within 65 µsec of the same time point for each reservoir. Single-channel recording solutions were made in the same saline solution used for the oocyte recordings and the patch pipette contained a solution consisting of (in mM): CsF, 80; CsCl, 20; Cs-EGTA, 10; HEPES, 10; MgATP, 3; pH 7.2. The pH was adjusted with CsOH. Electrodes were formed from borosilicate glass tubing and had resistances typically of 7 to 15 MOmega . Recordings were obtained with an Axopatch 1-D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and sampled with an VR-10A digital data recorder (Instrutech Corp., Great Neck, NY) onto video medium (Sharp Corp., Osaka, Japan; VHS model VC-A206C) for later analysis. Signals were sampled off-line at 50 kHz (Axoscope 2.0, Axon Inst.) and filtered at 7 kHz (Frequency Devices, Haverhill, MA; Model 902; eight-pole Bessel, -3 dB) for analysis. The effective cutoff frequency of the analysis was ~6.8 kHz after filtering and sampling. The system, therefore, would not detect events of duration <26 µsec. The 50% threshold analysis would not accurately resolve transitions of durations <50 µsec (Colquhoun and Sigworth, 1983). All single-channel analysis and fitting were performed with pClamp 6.0.3 (Axon Instruments). For channel open time determinations, events list files were formed by visual inspection of the data and manually accepting or rejecting putative events. The data in the events list files were then log-binned into histograms using eight or nine bins per decade and fitted with single- or double- (one patch) exponential functions using maximum likelihood optimization of a Simplex algorithm. The number of components that best described the fits was evaluated by the likelihood ratio. Open-level amplitude histograms were formed by conventional binning of accepted events that were longer in duration than 2.5 times the filter rise time (Tr = 0.3321/fc) and the resulting distributions were fitted with a Gaussian function of the appropriate number of components. For the ensemble averages (see fig. 2, the data were acquired using fixed-length event driven acquisition in pClamp (Fetchan) using the rising phase of the stimulator artifact at a threshold of 20 pA. The traces (episodes) were then averaged in Axograph 3.55 (Axon Instruments). For figures, histograms with fits were then exported to Origin (Version 4.1; Microcal Software, Northampton, MA). Representative single-channel traces were constructed by opening data files in Axograph and exporting data to Canvas 5.0 (Daneba Software, Miami, FL).

Molecular modeling. Nonconserved residues near the ligand binding site probably help distinguish between ACh and DMPP on alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs. Candidate residues were identified with the help of a published molecular model of the extracellular domain of the mouse muscle AChR (Tsigelny et al., 1997) and the crystal structure of DMPP (Chothia and Pauling, 1978), based on the presumed similarity in secondary and tertiary structure between muscle AChRs and alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs. The AChR model lacked residues 1-30, which were not included in our analysis. At the alpha 1/gamma interface, DMPP was placed between the alpha 1 and gamma  subunits and aligned lengthwise with its tertiary nitrogen at the midpoint of the vector between the alpha -carbon atoms of alpha 1 C192 (alpha 7 C190) and gamma  D174 (alpha 7 D164) and with the quaternary nitrogen closer to gamma  D174 (Karlin and Akabas, 1995). DMPP was positioned similarly at the alpha 1/delta interface using delta  D180 (alpha 7 D164) as a reference point on the delta  subunit. All residues at the alpha 1/gamma and alpha 1/delta interfaces whose alpha -carbons were within 20 Å of the tertiary nitrogen of the bound DMPP ligands were considered to be potential contributors to the discrimination between ACh and DMPP. These residues then were correlated with the equivalent residues of alpha 7 and alpha 8 by primary sequence similarity, and the nonconserved residues between alpha 7 and alpha 8 were identified. Sequence similarities were analyzed with the Pileup utility of the Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI). The model was displayed using InsightII (Molecular Simulations, San Diego, CA).

Simulations of concentration-response curves. Relative current as a function of time was simulated for the activation reaction shown in scheme 1. 
<UP>C</UP>+<UP>A</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>−</UP>1</SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB>1</SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>AC</UP>+<UP>A</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>−</UP>2</SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB>2</SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>C</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL>&agr;</LL><UL>&bgr;</UL></LIM> <UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP> <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>−</UP>4</SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB>4</SUB></UL></LIM> <UP>D</UP> (Scheme 1)
The current was assumed to be proportional to the fraction of the AChR population in the open state A2O. This fraction was calculated using the set of coupled differential pharmacokinetic equations 1-5, where A represents agonist; and C, AC and A2C represent unliganded, monoliganded, and diliganded closed AChRs; A2O represents diliganded open AChR; and D represents desensitized AChR. The association rate constants for agonist binding are k1 and k2; the dissociation constants are k-1 and k-2; the channel opening rate is beta ; the channel closing rate is alpha ; and the rates for desensitization and recovery from desensitization are k4 and k-4. The solutions were derived with the condition that the amount of bound ligand was negligible relative to free ligand. This set of equations was solved analytically in symbolic form using the method of Laplace transformation (Zhang et al., 1989) and the symbolic computation software Maple V (Release 3, Waterloo Maple, 450 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 5J2).
<FR><NU>d[<UP>C</UP>]</NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB>1</SUB>∗<UP>A</UP>∗<UP>C</UP>)+(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>1</SUB>∗<UP>AC</UP>) (1)
<FR><NU>d[<UP>AC</UP>]</NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>1</SUB>+k<SUB>2</SUB>∗<UP>A</UP>)∗<UP>AC</UP>+(k<SUB>1</SUB>∗<UP>A</UP>∗<UP>C</UP>)+(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>2</SUB>∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>C</UP>) (2)
<FR><NU>d[<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>C</UP>]</NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>2</SUB>+&bgr;)∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>C</UP>+(k<SUB>2</SUB>∗<UP>A</UP>∗<UP>AC</UP>)+(&agr;∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP>) (3)
<FR><NU>d[<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP>]</NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(&agr;+k<SUB>4</SUB>)∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP>+(&bgr;∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>C</UP>)+(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>4</SUB>∗<UP>D</UP>) (4)
<FR><NU>d[<UP>D</UP>]</NU><DE>dt</DE></FR>=<UP>−</UP>(k<SUB><UP>−</UP>4</SUB>∗<UP>D</UP>)+(k<SUB>4</SUB>∗<UP>A<SUB>2</SUB>O</UP>) (5)
After assignment of numerical values for the rate constants, the concentration-response curves were generated by determining the peak relative current at discrete agonist concentrations. The EC50 values and efficacies (Imax) were determined by fitting the simulated data points with a Hill-type equation (equation 6).
<UP>Peak current</UP>=<UP>I<SUB>max</SUB></UP>/{1+(<UP>EC</UP><SUB>50</SUB>/[<UP>A</UP>])<SUP>n<SUB>H</SUB></SUP>} (6)

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Kinetic basis of partial efficacy of DMPP. Previously, we showed that alpha 7 AChRs differ significantly from alpha 8 AChRs in their pharmacological properties (Gerzanich et al., 1994). ACh had 100% efficacy on both AChRs but lower apparent affinity for alpha 7 AChRs (EC50 ~110 µM) than for alpha 8 AChRs (EC50 ~2 µM). DMPP had only 9% efficacy on alpha 7 AChRs but 100% on alpha 8 AChRs. DMPP had lower apparent affinity for alpha 7 AChRs (EC50 ~30 µM) than for alpha 8 AChRs (EC50 ~6 µM).

Four possible mechanisms that could account for the lower efficacy of DMPP compared with ACh on alpha 7 AChRs were investigated. These were (1) DMPP can act as an open channel blocker; (2) DMPP-activated channels have a faster closing rate compared with ACh-activated channels; (3) DMPP desensitizes alpha 7 AChRs much faster than does ACh; or (4) the channel activation rate by DMPP is slower than by ACh. Using scheme 1 (see Materials and Methods), these four hypotheses are testable. Because the efficacy of DMPP was dramatically reduced (>80%) compared with ACh, we anticipated that the single currents channel for alpha 7 AChRs would exhibit differences between the two agonists that would be detectable even though the single-channel currents that have been attributed to alpha 7 AChRs are extremely rapid (Castro and Albuquerque, 1993).

Each of these four mechanisms would produce characteristic features in single-channel recordings. First, a channel block mechanism would be reflected in reduced single-channel open time and/or amplitude (depending on the rate of channel block and unblock) by DMPP. Extremely rapid transitions to a blocked state that are fast enough to achieve a frequency that would effectively reduce the macroscopic peak amplitude by >80% also would cause an apparent reduction in single-channel amplitude even if reduced open time could not be resolved. Alternatively, longer-lived blocked transitions with a sufficient blocking rate and duration to account for the dramatic reduction in efficacy would undoubtedly reduce the channel open time and/or open frequency. It would probably be impossible to quantify the rate or degree of block by DMPP due to limitations in the time resolution of recording; but the difference would be detectable nevertheless. Furthermore, considering that the longer duration openings would be more susceptible to channel block transitions than the shorter events that are not being resolved, the longer events that are detectable with ACh would be reduced in duration or rendered undectable by channel block when DMPP is agonist. Low frequency brief transitions that might not be resolved by single-channel analysis would not be sufficient to cause the difference in efficacy. Other evidence to be considered when evaluating a channel block mechanism that would not rely on single-channel analysis would be noncompetitive inhibition when DMPP is coapplied with ACh in macroscopic recordings of alpha 7 and whether this inhibition would be observed in recordings with alpha 7/alpha 8 chimeras that have the channel domain of alpha 8 as will be described below.

The second mechanism, a faster alpha  by DMPP, would have an effect similar to channel block in reducing channel open time leading to the predictions described above. The reduction in open time would have to be extreme to account for the >80% difference in efficacy. Because the recordings are at the limits of time resolution, channels with open times that are significantly faster would be missed altogether, which would be reflected as a reduction in the channel open frequency.

The third possible mechanism, a faster desensitization rate for DMPP to explain the >80% difference in efficacy for DMPP, would have to be dramatic, and the impact on single-channel activity would depend on the model for desensitization (i.e., whether out of the open or closed channel state). Faster desensitization out of the open channel state would result in dramatically reduced channel open time and/or channel frequency much like what has been described for the mechanisms of channel block or faster alpha . If faster desensitization occurred out of the closed channel state, then the difference in efficacy would appear as a reduction in open channel frequency.

The final possible kinetic mechanism, a slower channel opening rate by DMPP, cannot be examined by measurements of single-channel dwell times without prolonged steady state single-channel recording. This may not be possible with the alpha 7 AChR due to its propensity to desensitize as well as the problem of irreversible channel inactivation that is characteristic of neuronal nicotinic channels in outside-out patches, which would hinder such an approach. An alternative approach would be to activate channels in outside-out patches by high concentrations of both DMPP and ACh to observe their respective abilities to cause channel summation. A slower activation rate by DMPP would result in less channel summation, which would correspond to the macroscopic equivalent of partial efficacy. Furthermore, a slower activation rate would predict a slower rise time for DMPP-activated channels compared with ACh-activated channels that may be detectable from ensemble averages of multiple applications of each agonist on a patch.

Single-channel properties of alpha 7 AChRs. To distinguish among these possible kinetic mechanisms, we analyzed single-channel currents activated by ACh and DMPP in patches isolated from oocytes expressing alpha 7 AChRs. Applications of ACh or DMPP for 200 msec to outside-out patches evoked a rapid succession of extremely brief single-channel currents (fig. 1). Channel activity was extremely rare when the whole-cell currents were <7 µA (at -50 mV with 300 µM ACh) but were found in most membrane patches when the macroscopic responses were >15 µA. Channel openings began after a short delay (approx 10 msec) after a stimulus artifact. The delay was due to the placement of the recording electrode away from the interface between control and agonist solution (fig. 1). Channel activity ceased either prior to the termination of agonist application (as a result of desensitization) or within 5 to 10 msec after terminating the application, depending on agonist concentration. At higher agonist concentrations, more simultaneous multiple-channel openings occurred and desensitization happened more rapidly. By using ACh or DMPP at 60 µM, channel activity usually was sustained throughout the duration of the application and could be reactivated after approx 4 sec in control solution. Channel "rundown" was evident during the course of repetitive applications. Enough data to perform kinetic analysis was obtained by repetitively evoking channel activity by these brief agonist applications. When possible, both ACh and DMPP were tested on the same patch (n = 3).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   alpha 7 AChR single-channel currents activated by ACh or DMPP have identical mean open times. Top, rapid application of ACh or DMPP for approx 200 msec to outside-out patches from oocytes expressing alpha 7 AChRs evoked channel activity having extremely rapid open kinetics. Segments of each response to agonist application are also shown on an expanded time scale to illustrate the rapid kinetics. The solid bar above each trace represents the activation period of the application system. The delay between activation and the initial channel activity represents the distance traveled through the control solution into the agonist solution. The large current spikes are stimulator artifacts. Traces showing the entire application period were filtered at 3 kHz, while the expanded traces are shown at 7 kHz because this was the filter frequency for kinetic analysis. Bottom, representative channel open time histograms showing the distributions of channel open times activated by ACh or DMPP. Fits of the distributions to single-component exponential functions show that the mean channel open times for alpha 7 AChRs activated by either agonist are the same. All primary data shown are from the same patch while the mean open time values reflect the fits from 4 or 5 patches. In all cases, the holding potential was -80 mV.

No significant differences in channel open times or amplitudes were seen when comparing channels activated by ACh or DMPP (fig. 1). Channel open time distributions were usually best fit by single-exponential functions with time constants of 0.11 ± 0.001 msec for ACh and 0.10 ± 0.004 msec for DMPP at -80 mV. These channel open times are the same as what has been reported for a native alpha 7 AChR recorded under similar conditions from rat hippocampal neurons (Castro and Albuquerque, 1993). Since the open times for channels activated by ACh or DMPP are essentially identical, the channel closing rate alpha - and the channel desensitization rate directly out of the open state (k4) must be the same for channels activated by each agonist (see scheme 1). Additionally, the identical open times indicate that DMPP does not act as a channel blocker because channel block would appear as a shorter channel duration for DMPP. Channels activated by each agonist had similar amplitude distributions and demonstrated the presence of at least two channel conductances (data not shown). For ACh at -80 mV, the open channel amplitude distributions were fit best by Gaussian functions having constants of -3.4 ± 0.1 (n = 4), -2.4 (n = 2), and -4.6 pA (n = 1). All patches had at least the -3.4 pA channel. For DMPP (60 µM), the channel amplitudes were -3.5 ± 0.2 and -2.5 ± 0.1 pA (n = 4 for both). This indicated that the agonists showed no differential preference for activating different conductance channels. Additionally, the similar amplitudes indicate that DMPP was not causing extremely rapid block and unblock that could not be kinetically resolved due to filtering. Open probabilities were similar for both agonists at concentrations of 60 µM, which is twice the EC50 for DMPP and one half the EC50 for ACh, indicating that the rate of desensitization out of any state for DMPP was not significantly different than for ACh. Measurements of channel open frequencies were made during the applications of each agonist and the resulting frequency profiles (i.e. number of events per unit of time) were fit with an exponential probability density function (data not shown). The decay of this function represents the desensitization time constant at this concentration of agonist. The time constants were 20 msec for ACh-activated channels and 18 msec for DMPP-activated channels. In addition to different desensitization rates, the similar profile of channel frequencies during agonist applications also argue against long duration block transitions or faster channel closures by DMPP that might have been undetectable by open time analysis since this would cause an acceleration (smaller time constants) in the decay of the channel opening frequencies for DMPP compared with ACh. Collectively, these results showed that DMPP was not a channel blocker, that DMPP did not activate a lower conductance channel and that channels activated by DMPP did not have a faster channel closing or desensitization rate than those activated by ACh. More evidence against a channel blocking mechanism will be provided in later sections using macroscopic recordings and AChR chimeras.

Channel summation (i.e., simultaneous channel openings resulting in macroscopic-like responses) was used to determine whether a difference in beta  could account for the difference in efficacy between DMPP and ACh. Using concentrations of DMPP that would saturate binding avoided complications due to subsaturating conditions and allowed for possible kinetic mechanisms to be explored. First, single applications of high concentrations of DMPP (150-300 µM) caused less channel summation than did the same concentration of ACh (fig. 2, left). This experiment demonstrated that partial efficacy of DMPP could be observed in isolated patches. Second, in different experiments aimed at resolving the underlying kinetic difference between ACh and DMPP in causing channel summation to occur, ensemble averages of repetitive agonist applications (fig 2, right) show that the rise to peak of the averaged current was much slower for DMPP and that the peak of the average response for DMPP was much lower than for ACh. These results suggested that its lower efficacy compared with that of ACh was due to a slower channel activation rate (beta  in scheme 1) by DMPP.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Saturating concentrations of agonists show partial efficacy of DMPP on alpha 7 AChRs in outside-out patches. Left, from top to bottom are sequential applications of saturating concentrations of ACh or DMPP to the same outside-out patch from an oocyte expressing alpha 7 AChRs. The gray bar above each trace represents the time during which the agonist applicator is activated, with the delay to first opening representing the movement of the control solution over the tip of the recording electrode into the agonist solution. The large current spikes on either side of the bar are stimulator artifacts. The time between each application was approx 2 min. The peak amplitude of simultaneous channel opening was greater for ACh compared with DMPP, reflecting the partial efficacy of DMPP in activating alpha 7 AChRs in outside-out patches. The holding potential was -80 mV. Right, for a different outside-out patch than is shown in the left, ensemble averages of multiple applications of saturating concentrations of ACh or DMPP were constructed. The average traces represent 10 applications of ACh and 11 applications of DMPP. The peak amplitude of the average ACh response was larger than that of DMPP, whereas the onset of the current for DMPP had a slower rise to peak and was delayed. The holding potential was -80 mV.

In addition to the slower rise to peak for DMPP, a longer delay before channel activation by DMPP was observed (fig. 2, right) in several patches where both agonists were tested at high concentrations. This delay in onset of channel activation suggests that a more complex activation mechanism than is depicted by scheme 1 is likely to be involved. Nevertheless, the slower rise to peak for DMPP is entirely consistent with a smaller beta .

Analysis of alpha 7/alpha 8 subunit chimeras: determinants of efficacy and potency. To determine which regions of alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits account for the observed differences in efficacy and EC50 between ACh and DMPP, a series of chimeric alpha 7/alpha 8 subunits were expressed as homomers in Xenopus oocytes. Their functional properties with respect to activation by ACh and DMPP were compared with those of the alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs (table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Agonist potencies and efficacies for alpha 7, alpha 8, and chimeric AChRs

The degree to which the N-terminal extracellular domain alone governed the pharmacological properties of alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs was tested by constructing a chimeric subunit containing the whole N-terminal extracellular domain from the alpha 7 subunit (residues 1-208) fused to residues 209 through the C-terminus of the alpha 8 subunit. Responses of these alpha 7(1-208)/alpha 8 AChRs to various concentrations of ACh and DMPP were measured at holding potentials of -30 mV to -70 mV. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties similar to alpha 7 AChRs (fig. 3 and table 1). In particular, DMPP was a partial agonist. The close pharmacological similarity between alpha 7 and alpha 7(1-208)/alpha 8 AChRs indicated that amino acids within the N-terminal extracellular domain of these subunits largely determine the pharmacological differences between alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Comparison of agonist efficacies and potencies for the various alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunit chimeras. Shown on top are representations of alpha 7 AChRs, chimeric alpha 7(1-208)/alpha 8 AChRs, alpha 7(1-115)/alpha 8 AChRs, alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChR, alpha 8(1-114)/alpha 7(115-179)/alpha 8 AChRs and alpha 8 AChRs. Open boxes represent regions of the alpha 8 subunit and hatched boxes represent regions of the alpha 7 subunit. Black boxes represent the transmembrane domains. Numbering refers to residues in the mature alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunit. Typical responses to 2 sec applications (depicted by gray bars) of various concentrations of ACh or DMPP are shown below each representation for that AChR expressed in oocytes. The responses shown for ACh and DMPP are from different oocytes, but the DMPP response in each case is normalized to the maximal ACh response elicited by a single application of saturating concentration of ACh to that oocyte. Each point on the concentration-response relationship represents the normalized mean value from at least three different oocytes and is accompanied by the fit to a Hill equation. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. The holding potentials ranged between -30 (alpha 7 only) and -70 mV depending on peak current amplitudes.

A more precise definition of regions within the N-terminal extracellular domain that dictate the differences in pharmacological properties between alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs was sought by constructing a chimeric subunit containing only the N-terminal 115 amino acid residues of the alpha 7 subunit fused to amino acid residues 116 through the C-terminus of the alpha 8 subunit. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties similar to alpha 8 AChRs (fig. 3 and table 1). DMPP was fully efficacious. The close pharmacological similarity between alpha 8 and alpha 7(1-115)/alpha 8 AChRs indicated that amino acid residues 1-115 were not sufficient to determine the pharmacological differences observed between alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs.

To establish the extent of alpha 7 sequence necessary to confer the pharmacological properties of alpha 7 AChRs to chimeric alpha 7/alpha 8 AChRs, the N-terminal 179 amino acid residues of the alpha 7 subunit were fused to amino acid residues 180 through the C-terminus of the alpha 8 subunit. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties of both alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs: like alpha 7 AChRs, DMPP was a partial agonist; but the EC50 values were similar to alpha 8 AChRs (fig. 3 and table 1). Thus, this chimera delineated two different regions of these subunits, one corresponding to residues 1-179 that conveys the partial efficacy of DMPP and the other corresponding to residues 180-208 that affects the EC50 values of both ACh and DMPP.

Because a major transition in the efficacy of activation by DMPP, but not in the EC50 values for activation by either DMPP or ACh, was observed between the alpha 7(1-115)/alpha 8 AChRs and the alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs, a fourth chimeric subunit was constructed to assess the contributions of residues 115-179. A chimeric subunit in which amino acid residues 115-179 from the alpha 8 subunit were replaced with the corresponding residues from the alpha 7 subunit was constructed. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties similar to alpha 8 AChRs (fig. 3 and table 1). The similarity of the pharmacological profile of alpha 8(1-114)/alpha 7(115-179)/alpha 8 AChRs to that of alpha 8 AChRs demonstrated that the partial efficacy of DMPP was dependent on the simultaneous presence of residues within region 1-115 and region 116-179.

Residues within region 180-208 governing the EC50 values of ACh and DMPP were further analyzed by site-directed mutagenesis. Starting with the alpha 7 subunit, each of the nonconserved residues between alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits that were located with the region affecting the agonist EC50 values was mutated from the alpha 7 residue to the corresponding alpha 8 residue (T/N184, S/L186, F/Y187, I/V198, F/Y200 and V/I202). Each singly mutated subunit then was expressed as a homomeric AChR. The measured EC50 values and the efficacies for both ACh and DMPP were not significantly different from those of wild type alpha 7 AChRs (data not shown). The double mutant F187 to Y187 and F200 to Y200 also exhibited a profile very similar to that of the wild type alpha 7 AChRs. The difference in agonist EC50 values between alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs, therefore, did not result from any single residue difference but rather was the result of multiple interactions between the agonists and some combination of the six nonconserved residues.

DMPP competitively inhibits ACh-activated currents. To confirm that DMPP was acting only through the agonist binding site, we examined whether its interaction with ACh on alpha 7 AChRs was competitive. Responses to various concentrations of ACh applied alone and coapplied with different concentrations of DMPP were measured as shown in figure 4. In the presence of both its EC50 (30 µM) and at saturating concentrations of DMPP (300 µM), the activation of alpha 7 AChRs by ACh was inhibited in a competitive manner. These results are consistent with DMPP acting solely through competition with ACh for the agonist binding site because any allosteric interaction including channel block by DMPP would be revealed by a submaximal response at the higher end of the concentration-response curve.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   DMPP and ACh interact competitively with alpha 7 AChRs. The peak current elicited by ACh coapplied with either a saturating concentration of 300 µM DMPP or an EC50 concentration of 30 µM DMPP was plotted as a function of the ACh concentration. The peak response in each case is normalized to the peak response at 1 mM ACh in the absence of DMPP. The concentration-response curve for ACh is shifted to the right when going from 30 µM DMPP to 300 µM DMPP and ACh completely displaces DMPP to achieve its maximal response, compatible with competitive inhibition. Each point on the concentration-response relationship represents the normalized mean value from at least three different oocytes and is accompanied by the fit to a Hill equation. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. The holding potential was -50 mV.

Voltage dependence of the efficacy of DMPP. We established that the partial efficacy of DMPP with alpha 7 AChRs was due to a slower rate of activation (beta  in scheme 1) by DMPP compared with ACh. Because that step in muscle AChR activation depends on transmembrane potential (Chabala, 1992; Sine and Steinbach, 1986), we examined whether the efficacy of DMPP on alpha 7 AChRs also was voltage dependent. The voltage dependence initially was revealed experimentally by the strong deviation in the macroscopic current-voltage relationship for DMPP from the ohmic relationship observed for ACh at negative holding potentials (data not shown). To address this issue directly, the full current-voltage relationships were recorded for alpha 7 AChRs in response to 1 mM ACh (Imax, ACh) or 3 mM DMPP (Imax, DMPP) between -90 and +90 mV. The ratio of these values (Imax, DMPP/Imax, ACh) showed a strong voltage dependence (e-fold/35.5 mV) at negative holding potentials, but little voltage dependence at positive holding potentials (fig. 5). In addition, the efficacy of DMPP dramatically increased to >80% of ACh at positive potentials. In a different series of experiments, 300 µM DMPP was used to inhibit alpha 7 AChR responses elicited by 1 mM ACh at holding potentials from -90 mV to +90 mV. Normalizing to the maximal response elicited by 1 mM ACh alone from the same oocyte showed that the inhibition by DMPP was strongly voltage dependent, being greater at more negative holding potentials (data not shown). However, it should be reiterated that the single-channel and chimera data described above have completely eliminated the possibility of a channel block mechanism for DMPP. Specifically, the mean open times and amplitudes for DMPP-activated channels were identical to those activated by ACh at a concentration of DMPP where its efficacy had peaked. Most persuasively, DMPP is a partial agonist on chimeras having an alpha 8 channel domain, whereas DMPP with the full-length alpha 8 AChR is a full agonist.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The efficacy of DMPP is voltage dependent. The ratio of the maximal response at a saturating concentration of 3 mM DMPP (Imax, DMPP) to the maximal response a saturating concentration of 1 mM ACh (Imax, ACh) elicited on alpha 7 AChRs (open circle ) and chimeric alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs (bullet ) is plotted as a function of the holding potential from -90 mV to +90 mV. The data points from responses at negative holding potentials are fitted to an exponential function with the slope of the fit representing the voltage dependence of DMPP efficacy.

Because the efficacy of DMPP is governed by the region 1-179 of the extracellular domain, we questioned whether the voltage dependence of the efficacy was controlled by this region as well or if this region simply revealed an intrinsic property of the gating of alpha 7 AChRs. To this end, the maximal response elicited by 1 mM ACh alone and by 3 mM DMPP alone was measured as a function of the holding potential from oocytes expressing chimeric alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs. The ratio of Imax, DMPP to Imax, ACh for alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs exhibited nearly the same voltage dependence (e-fold/32 mV) at negative holding potentials as alpha 7 AChRs and little voltage dependence at positive potentials (fig. 5). However, unlike alpha 7 AChRs, for which the efficacy of DMPP approached that of ACh at positive potentials, the efficacy of DMPP on alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs remained <20% of that for ACh, even at +90 mV. Because the alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 chimera derives all four transmembrane domains (M1-M4) from the alpha 8 subunit, the nearly identical voltage dependence suggests that residues that are responsible for the voltage sensitivity of gating of these AChRs are conserved between the alpha 7 and the alpha 8 subunits and are probably located within their transmembrane domains. By contrast, the regions that govern the magnitude of beta  (the intrinsic voltage insensitive component) were unique to their respective AChRs.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

We demonstrated that region 1-179 within the alpha 7 AChR N-terminal extracellular domain affects efficacy of DMPP. This region, when swapped into alpha 8 AChRs, converts the efficacy of DMPP from full to partial that is characteristic of its action on alpha 7 AChRs. Partial efficacy is due to a slower opening rate beta . By comparison, region 180-208 affects EC50 values. These two regions appear to be modular because their effects segregate independently in chimeras. We also conclude that the opening rate alpha  is voltage dependent, suggesting that extracellular region 1-179 in addition to transmembrane regions that contain gating charges affect beta .

Partial efficacy of DMPP was not due to channel blockade or a faster channel closing rate alpha  for DMPP. DMPP caused a parallel rightward shift in ACh concentration-response curves for alpha 7 AChRs without reducing maximal response. Furthermore, the alpha 7 extracellular domain confers partial efficacy to chimeras having the alpha 8 channel domain, and DMPP is a full agonist on alpha 8. These results eliminated allosteric sites for DMPP including channel blockade as possible mechanisms, leaving only differences in microscopic rates as potential mechanisms. We recorded single-channel currents to determine which rate constants for activation of alpha 7 AChRs could account for partial efficacy of DMPP. Open times of alpha 7 AChRs were similar for the two agonists, ruling out faster alpha  and channel block because these would have caused shorter open times. Furthermore, unitary current amplitudes for DMPP-activated channels were not different from those for ACh-activated channels.

Possible mechanisms, therefore, were narrowed to either a faster desensitization rate out of the closed state (but not the open state) or a decreased rate of activation by DMPP compared with ACh. These possibilities were distinguished by decay in channel opening frequency during agonist application. alpha 7 AChR channels activated at lower agonist concentrations (60 µM) decayed in frequency with time constants of 20 msec for ACh and 18 msec for DMPP. Differences in channel desensitization rates were, therefore, not significant.

Partial efficacy of DMPP was best explained by a slower activation rate beta . Onsets of opening (first latency) on agonist applications (150 µM ACh or DMPP) were different. Because binding steps were saturated by high DMPP concentration, beta  for DMPP compared with ACh accounted best for differences in efficacy. Slower beta  disfavors formation of the open state by DMPP, reducing its efficacy. Efficacy of DMPP should be increased by manipulations that favor formation of the open state, thus offsetting a reduced beta . Interestingly, ivermectin, an anthelmintic, almost completely restores the efficacy of DMPP by stabilizing the open state of alpha 7 AChRs (Krause et al., 1998). These kinetics classify DMPP as a true partial agonist on chicken alpha 7 AChRs, distinguishing it from partial agonists arising from other mechanisms. A similar conclusion was reached for activation of muscle AChRs by decamethonium, although channel block complicated the interpretation (Liu and Dilger, 1993).

High-sequence identity between alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits (Schoepfer et al., 1990) facilitated mapping of regions determining differences in efficacy for DMPP, as well as differences in apparent affinity for ACh and DMPP. Only 47 residues are not conserved in the N-terminal extracellular domain of alpha 7 and alpha 8 subunits. They have identical residues in M2 and differ in M1 by 1 residue, in M3 by 3 residues, in the large cytoplasmic domain by 83 residues, in M4 by 6 residues, and in the C-terminus by two residues.

Region 1-179 was a sufficient determinant of efficacy of DMPP. Because proximity to the agonist binding site would seem required for distinguishing ACh from DMPP, it is reassuring that photoaffinity labeling and mutagenesis using Torpedo AChRs identified at least three homologous residues within this region that lie near the binding site: alpha 1 W149, delta  W57 and delta  D174 (Changeux et al., 1992). Interestingly, no difference between efficacy of ACh and DMPP was observed in the chimera alpha 8(1-114)/alpha 7(115-179)/alpha 8, suggesting that nonconserved amino acids within region 115-179 are not sole determinants of partial efficacy of DMPP. Instead, amino acids within region 1-115 of alpha 7 also are required. To account for partial efficacy of DMPP, two or more of the 41 nonconserved amino acid residues within region 1-179 must interact together with DMPP to interfere with structural transitions for activation.

Based on the presumed similarity in secondary and tertiary structure between muscle AChRs and alpha 7/alpha 8 AChRs, we used a model of mouse muscle AChR extracellular domain (Tsigelny et al., 1997) to suggest a subset of 14 nonconserved residues between alpha 7 and alpha 8 that may be nearest the binding site at the interface between subunits (fig. 6). These nonconserved residues of alpha 7/alpha 8 within 20 Å of bound DMPP in the model include Y/H151, G/S152, S/L155 and L/I156 on the alpha 1-equivalent subunit and Y/E32, F/L33, T/Q34, M/L38, T/I51, I/A54, T/V61, H/I63, H/S115 and G/N167 on the gamma - and delta -equivalent subunits. The pi-pi interactions between DMPP and aromatic residues of the AChR at positions 32, 33 and 151 may be important in slowing conformational changes triggered by DMPP binding, resulting in a slower beta .


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Nonconserved residues of alpha 7 that may contribute to the pharmacological differences of ACh and DMPP on alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs. A model of the extracellular domain (residues 31-200, based on mouse muscle AChR) of nicotinic AChRs (Tsigelny et al., 1997) was used to find nonconserved residues that may be within 20 Å of the agonist binding site. Top, the alpha -carbon trace of the original muscle AChR model as viewed from the extracellular face with the placement of DMPP at the interface between the alpha 1 and gamma  subunits and on the vector between alpha 1 C192 (alpha 7 C190) and gamma  D174 (alpha 7 D164) (Karlin and Akabas, 1995). The muscle subunits are labeled alpha , beta , gamma  and delta . A region of 20 Å radius centered on the tertiary nitrogen of DMPP is indicated by the circle. With residues renumbered by primary sequence similarity according to the alpha 7 sequence, segments in the model with alpha carbon atoms within 20 Å of DMPP included residues 110-111, 148-155 and 181-194 from the alpha 1-equivalent subunit and residues 31-41, 45-48, 52-65 and 164-171 from gamma -equivalent subunit. Similar, although not identical, segments at the alpha -delta -equivalent interface of the model were residues 136-137, 150-158 and 181-194 from the alpha 1-equivalent subunit and residues 31-39, 44-46, 48-65, 109-111, 113-115 and 164-170 from the delta -equivalent subunit. Bottom, region around DMPP and displays the heavy atoms of the following 12 residues of alpha 7 that are not conserved between alpha 7 and alpha 8: Y/H151, G/S152, S/L155 and L/I156 on the alpha 1-equivalent subunits and Y/E32, F/L33, T/Q34, M/L38, I/A54, T/V61, H/I63 and G/N167 on the gamma -equivalent subunit. The alpha -carbons of residues C190 and D164 also are labeled as reference points. Numbering of the residues in the lower panel is based on the alpha 7 sequence. Similar analysis with DMPP at the alpha 1/delta interface added T/I51 and H/S115 of the delta -equivalent subunit to form the subset of 14 nonconserved residues that are close to the agonist binding site in the model and, therefore, that may have a high likelihood of contributing to the pharmacological differences between ACh and DMPP on alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs.

A second region, 180-208, determines differences in activation EC50 values of alpha 7 and alpha 8 AChRs between ACh and DMPP. This region contains residues that previously were identified as contributing to agonist binding including Y190, C192, C193 and Y198 (Bertrand et al., 1992; Changeux et al., 1992). A combination of two or more of the six nonconserved residues (184, 186, 187, 198, 200 and 202) within this region accounts for the differences in EC50 values, since EC50 values were not significantly altered when these residues were mutated individually.

Numerical modeling of concentration-response curves confirmed that our kinetic and structural interpretations were consistent with scheme 1 (fig. 7). Differences in opening rates for ACh and DMPP were sufficient to account for differences in efficacy. Moreover, simulations showed that opening rate and agonist binding properties that segregated with regions 1-179 and 180-208, respectively, accounted for observed efficacies and EC50 values of DMPP on alpha 7, alpha 8 and chimeric alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs. These results are consistent with region 180-208 affecting EC50 through contributions to ligand binding.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Numerical modeling of AChR concentration-response curves for DMPP. Numerical simulations of concentration-response curves for DMPP with alpha 7 AChRs, alpha 8 AChRs and chimeric alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs are consistent with the assignment of gating effects to region 1-179 and binding effects to region 180-208. The simulations according to linear activation scheme 1 (see Methods) were derived from computed relative peak currents as a function of agonist concentration. The peak DMPP currents were normalized to the ACh-evoked peak current at saturation, which was assumed to be the same for alpha 7, alpha 8 and chimeric alpha 7(1-179)/alpha 8 AChRs. The intrinsic equilibrium dissociation constants of the two agonist binding sites were assumed to be equal within each AChR molecule. The closing rate alpha was fixed at 10,000 sec-1 in agreement with our single-channel data. Rate constants for the binding steps and the opening rate beta for ACh were approximated from single-channel analysis that was reported for similar steps of the muscle-type AChR expressed in fibroblasts (Sine et al., 1990). The desensitization rate k4 (100 sec-1), recovery rate k-4 (0.02 sec-1), association rate k1 (1.6 × 108 M-1 sec-1) and association rate k2 (8 × 107 M-1 sec-1) were the same for all three AChRs for both ACh and DMPP. ACh-specific rates for alpha 7 AChR: k-1 = 14,000 sec-1, k-2 = 28,000 sec-1, beta  = 45,000 sec-1; for alpha 8 AChR: k-1 = 100 sec-1, k-2 = 200 sec-1, beta  = 45,000 sec-1. DMPP-specific rates for alpha 7 AChR: k-1 = 1800 sec-1, k-2 = 3600 sec-1, beta  = 1500 sec-1; for alpha 8 AChR: k-1 =&