Neuroscience Center of Excellence and Department of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70112 (R.A.);
Department of Neurosurgery, University
of Maryland, MTSF, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (V.G.); and
Department of
Neuroscience (M.E.N., J.L.) and
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine (G.B.W.), University of Pennsylvania Medical School,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6074
 |
Introduction |
A
menagerie of neuronal AChR subunit cDNAs termed
2-
9 and
2-
4 have been identified (Lindstrom et al., 1996
;
Papke, 1993
; Role and Berg, 1996
; Sargent, 1993
). Sequence analysis
revealed that they are members of a larger gene superfamily of
ligand-gated ion channels whose members include the
GABAA, glycine and 5-HT3 receptors (Barnard, 1992
; Betz, 1990
). In the AChR family,
7,
8
and
9 subunits form functional homomers when expressed in Xenopus oocytes (Couturier et al., 1990
; Elgoyhen
et al., 1994
; Gerzanich et al., 1994
; Schoepfer
et al., 1990
). Other AChR subtypes require coexpression of
at least pairs of
and
subunits to form functional AChRs.
Numerous investigators have exploited the inherent structural
homogeneity of homomeric
7 AChRs to understand the molecular
determinants of AChR properties such as desensitization (Revah et
al., 1991
), ligand affinity (Corringer et al., 1995
; Galzi et al., 1991
), ion selectivity (Galzi et
al., 1992
) and modulation by extracellular
Ca++ binding (Galzi et al., 1996
), as
well as to demonstrate the extensive structural similarities between
members of the gene superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels (Eisele
et al., 1993
).
We have taken advantage of the structural homogeneity of the closely
related homomeric
7 and
8 AChRs, in conjunction with their
pharmacological differences, to identify regions of the N-terminal
extracellular domain that affect activation of these AChRs. Previously,
we have shown that ACh exhibits significantly lower potency
(EC50) and DMPP exhibits dramatically lower
efficacy for activation of
7 AChRs compared with activation of
8
AChRs (Gerzanich et al., 1994
). In this report, we establish
the kinetic basis for the partial efficacy of DMPP on
7 AChRs.
Single-channel analysis of
7 AChR activity shows that the partial
efficacy of DMPP is due to a slower rate of activation by DMPP compared
with ACh. In contrast, the rates of desensitization, mean open times and conductances are not significantly different for
7 channels activated by these two agonists. The functional properties of AChRs
expressed from chimeras of subunits
7 and
8 have been used to
identify regions that are responsible for the pharmacological differences observed between their cognate AChRs. The region 1-179 is
responsible for the differences in efficacy of DMPP, whereas the region
180-208 is responsible for the differences in
EC50 values for activation by ACh and DMPP. DMPP
competes with ACh for activation of
7 AChRs. The efficacy of DMPP is
voltage dependent due to voltage dependence of the channel activation
rate and not due to channel block. Collectively, our results
demonstrate that regions within the N-terminal extracellular domain of
7 and
8 AChRs (and possibly other ligand-gated channels) govern
not only the affinity for agonists but also the transition rates
between closed and open states.
 |
Methods |
Mutants and chimeras.
All site-directed mutagenesis was
performed using the Altered Sites II in vitro Mutagenesis
System (Promega, Madison, WI). The
7(1-115)/
8 chimera was
constructed by introducing a BamHI site in the
7 cDNA at
a position analogous to the BamHI site in the
8 cDNA.
Then, a HindIII/BamHI DNA fragment corresponding to residues 1-115 of the
7 subunit was used to replace the
HindIII/BamHI fragment corresponding to residues
1-115 of the
8 subunit. The chimera
7(1-179)/
8 was
constructed by first introducing an EcoRI site in the
8
cDNA at a position analogous to the EcoRI site in the
7
cDNA. Then, a HindIII/EcoRI fragment
corresponding to residues 1-179 of the
7 subunit was used to
replace the HindIII/EcoRI fragment corresponding
to residues 1-179 of the
8 subunit. The chimera
7(1-208)/
8
was constructed by a three-way ligation involving a
HindIII/EcoRV fragment corresponding to residues
1-197 of the
7 subunit, an EcoRV/HgaI
double-stranded synthetic DNA cassette encoding residues 198-208 and a
HgaI/BstEII fragment corresponding to residues
209-481 of the
8 subunit. The chimera
8(1-114)/
7(115-179)/
8(180-208)/
8 was constructed by a
three-way ligation involving a HindIII/BamHI fragment corresponding to residues 1-114 of the
8 subunit, a BamHI/EcoRI fragment corresponding to residues
115-179 of the
7 subunit and an EcoRI/BstEII
fragment corresponding to residues 180-481 of the
8 subunit. The
DNA sequence integrity of all mutant and chimera constructs was
verified by standard dideoxy sequencing.
Expression in oocytes.
cRNA from linearized cDNA templates
was synthesized in vitro using SP6 RNA polymerase in
conjunction with reagents from the mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion,
Austin, TX). Oocytes were prepared for injection as previously
described (Wang et al., 1996
). Oocytes were injected with 50 to 100 ng of RNA per oocyte and incubated at 18°C in saline solution
with (in mM): NaCl, 96; KCl, 2; MgCl2, 1;
CaCl2, 1.8; HEPES, 5; pH 7.6.
Oocyte electrophysiology.
Currents were measured using a
standard two-microelectrode voltage-clamp amplifier (oocyte clamp
OC-725; Warner Instrument, Hamden, CT) as previously described
(Gerzanich et al., 1995
). Electrodes were filled with 3 M
KCl and had resistances of 0.5 to 1.0 M
for the current electrode
and 1 to 2 M
for the voltage electrode. All records were digitized
(MacLab/2e interface; AD Instruments) and stored on an Apple Macintosh
IIcx computer and were analyzed using SCOPE (AD Instruments, Castle
Hill, Australia) and Axograph software (Axon Instruments). Data were
analyzed using KALEIDAGRAPH (Synergy Software, Reading, PA). The
recording chamber was continually perfused at a flow rate of 10 ml/min
with saline solution. Application of drugs was performed using a set of
eight glass tubes (internal diameter, 2 mm) ending in the bath 3 mm from the oocyte and connected to 10-ml syringes, which were placed 10 cm above the recording chamber. Manual clamping and unclamping of the
flexible tube connecting the syringe to the perfusion glass tube
directed at the oocytes were used to control the flow of drugs. The
delay between the application of the drugs and the appearance of a
response was typically 250 to 300 msec, corresponding to the time
needed for the drugs to reach the oocyte. At negative holding
potentials, the Ca++ influx due to the activation
of
7 AChRs and
8 AChRs by cholinergic agonists typically leads to
the activation of endogenous Ca++-dependent
Cl
channels, which may be responsible for some
of the shoulder currents observed in our recordings. In all the
experiments described in this report, we did not prevent the activation
of these Ca++-dependent
Cl
channels because we have previously shown
that agonist EC50 values for activation of
7
and
8 AChRs do not significantly change under conditions in which
the currents from Ca++ dependent
Cl
channels are minimized (Devillers-Thiery
et al., 1992
; Gerzanich et al., 1994
)
(i.e., in the presence of BAPTA AM or at holding potentials of ~
20 mV, which is close to the reversal potentials for
the Cl
channels in oocytes).
Data analysis.
Concentration-response curves were obtained
by measuring the response to increasing concentrations of agonists.
Only oocytes that gave reproducible responses to a fixed concentration
of 1 mM ACh before and after the test doses were used for further
analysis. The expression levels of the AChRs were found to vary over
the year and even between oocytes obtained from the same animal. Hence, the holding potentials were varied from
30 to
70 mV to obtain responses suitable for analysis. However, the agonist
EC50 values for any given AChR did not change
significantly as a function of the holding potential at which the
experiment was done. The currents elicited by DMPP were always
normalized to currents elicited by saturating concentrations of ACh on
the same oocyte. The concentration-response curves were fitted to the
Hill equation. All concentration-response curves shown are the mean of
values obtained from at least three different oocytes.
Single-channel recordings.
Xenopus oocytes were
manually stripped of the vitelline membrane after osmotic shrinking
with a 200 mM potassium aspartate solution (Methfessel et
al., 1986
). Outside-out configuration patches (Hamill et
al., 1981
) were formed from stripped oocytes expressing
recombinant chicken
7 AChRs from cRNAs that were injected cytosolically at least 4 days earlier. Single-channel currents were
activated in patches by a 200-msec application of ACh flowing from one
barrel of a two-barrel glass capillary tubing attached to a
piezoelectric bimorph application system that was activated by an
isolated pulse stimulator (either an A-M Systems model 2100 or Grass
Medical Instruments models SD9 or S48-B). Before application of
agonist, the patch was isolated in a continuously flowing control solution from the other barrel. Agonists were selected among by a
six-way valve. The speed of solution exchange was determined by
clamping an open recording electrode at 0 mV and then measuring the
change in the solution junction potential when moving from a normal
recording solution to one that had been diluted 5-fold with deionized
water. The time constant for the change in clamping current during the
solution exchange was ~1 msec. To test the system for variability of
solution flow rate, the delay between applicator activation and onset
of the junction potential change was measured. The onset of the change
occurred within 65 µsec of the same time point for each reservoir.
Single-channel recording solutions were made in the same saline
solution used for the oocyte recordings and the patch pipette contained
a solution consisting of (in mM): CsF, 80; CsCl, 20; Cs-EGTA, 10;
HEPES, 10; MgATP, 3; pH 7.2. The pH was adjusted with CsOH. Electrodes
were formed from borosilicate glass tubing and had resistances
typically of 7 to 15 M
. Recordings were obtained with an Axopatch
1-D amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and sampled with an
VR-10A digital data recorder (Instrutech Corp., Great Neck, NY) onto video medium (Sharp Corp., Osaka, Japan; VHS model VC-A206C) for later
analysis. Signals were sampled off-line at 50 kHz (Axoscope 2.0, Axon
Inst.) and filtered at 7 kHz (Frequency Devices, Haverhill, MA; Model
902; eight-pole Bessel,
3 dB) for analysis. The effective cutoff
frequency of the analysis was ~6.8 kHz after filtering and sampling.
The system, therefore, would not detect events of duration <26 µsec.
The 50% threshold analysis would not accurately resolve transitions of
durations <50 µsec (Colquhoun and Sigworth, 1983
). All
single-channel analysis and fitting were performed with pClamp 6.0.3 (Axon Instruments). For channel open time determinations, events list
files were formed by visual inspection of the data and manually
accepting or rejecting putative events. The data in the events list
files were then log-binned into histograms using eight or nine bins per
decade and fitted with single- or double- (one patch) exponential
functions using maximum likelihood optimization of a Simplex algorithm.
The number of components that best described the fits was evaluated by
the likelihood ratio. Open-level amplitude histograms were formed by
conventional binning of accepted events that were longer in duration
than 2.5 times the filter rise time (Tr = 0.3321/fc) and the resulting distributions were
fitted with a Gaussian function of the appropriate number of
components. For the ensemble averages (see fig. 2, the data were
acquired using fixed-length event driven acquisition in pClamp (Fetchan) using the rising phase of the stimulator artifact at a
threshold of 20 pA. The traces (episodes) were then averaged in
Axograph 3.55 (Axon Instruments). For figures, histograms with fits
were then exported to Origin (Version 4.1; Microcal Software, Northampton, MA). Representative single-channel traces were constructed by opening data files in Axograph and exporting data to Canvas 5.0 (Daneba Software, Miami, FL).
Molecular modeling.
Nonconserved residues near the ligand
binding site probably help distinguish between ACh and DMPP on
7 and
8 AChRs. Candidate residues were identified with the help of a
published molecular model of the extracellular domain of the mouse
muscle AChR (Tsigelny et al., 1997
) and the crystal
structure of DMPP (Chothia and Pauling, 1978
), based on the presumed
similarity in secondary and tertiary structure between muscle AChRs and
7 and
8 AChRs. The AChR model lacked residues 1-30, which were
not included in our analysis. At the
1/
interface, DMPP was
placed between the
1 and
subunits and aligned lengthwise
with its tertiary nitrogen at the midpoint of the vector between the
-carbon atoms of
1 C192 (
7 C190) and
D174 (
7 D164)
and with the quaternary nitrogen closer to
D174 (Karlin and Akabas,
1995
). DMPP was positioned similarly at the
1/
interface
using
D180 (
7 D164) as a reference point on the
subunit. All residues at the
1/
and
1/
interfaces whose
-carbons were within 20 Å of the tertiary nitrogen of the bound DMPP ligands were considered to be potential contributors to the
discrimination between ACh and DMPP. These residues then were
correlated with the equivalent residues of
7 and
8 by primary sequence similarity, and the nonconserved residues between
7 and
8 were identified. Sequence similarities were analyzed with the
Pileup utility of the Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package (Genetics
Computer Group, Madison, WI). The model was displayed using InsightII
(Molecular Simulations, San Diego, CA).
Simulations of concentration-response curves.
Relative
current as a function of time was simulated for the activation reaction
shown in scheme 1.
|
(Scheme 1)
|
The current was assumed to be proportional to the fraction of
the AChR population in the open state A2O. This
fraction was calculated using the set of coupled differential
pharmacokinetic equations 1-5, where A represents agonist; and C, AC
and A2C represent unliganded, monoliganded, and
diliganded closed AChRs; A2O represents diliganded open AChR; and D represents desensitized AChR. The association rate constants for agonist binding are
k1 and k2; the
dissociation constants are k-1 and
k-2; the channel opening rate is
; the
channel closing rate is
; and the rates for desensitization and
recovery from desensitization are k4 and
k-4. The solutions were derived with the
condition that the amount of bound ligand was negligible relative to
free ligand. This set of equations was solved analytically in symbolic
form using the method of Laplace transformation (Zhang et
al., 1989
) and the symbolic computation software Maple V (Release
3, Waterloo Maple, 450 Phillip Street, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L
5J2).
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
After assignment of numerical values for the rate constants, the
concentration-response curves were generated by determining the peak
relative current at discrete agonist concentrations. The
EC50 values and efficacies
(Imax) were determined by fitting the simulated
data points with a Hill-type equation (equation 6).
|
(6)
|
 |
Results |
Kinetic basis of partial efficacy of DMPP.
Previously, we
showed that
7 AChRs differ significantly from
8 AChRs in their
pharmacological properties (Gerzanich et al., 1994
). ACh had
100% efficacy on both AChRs but lower apparent affinity for
7 AChRs
(EC50 ~110 µM) than for
8 AChRs
(EC50 ~2 µM). DMPP had only 9% efficacy on
7 AChRs but 100% on
8 AChRs. DMPP had lower apparent affinity
for
7 AChRs (EC50 ~30 µM) than for
8
AChRs (EC50 ~6 µM).
Four possible mechanisms that could account for the lower efficacy
of DMPP compared with ACh on
7 AChRs were investigated. These were
(1) DMPP can act as an open channel blocker; (2) DMPP-activated channels have a faster closing rate compared with ACh-activated channels; (3) DMPP desensitizes
7 AChRs much faster than does ACh;
or (4) the channel activation rate by DMPP is slower than by ACh. Using
scheme 1 (see Materials and Methods), these four hypotheses are
testable. Because the efficacy of DMPP was dramatically reduced
(>80%) compared with ACh, we anticipated that the single currents
channel for
7 AChRs would exhibit differences between the two
agonists that would be detectable even though the single-channel currents that have been attributed to
7 AChRs are extremely rapid (Castro and Albuquerque, 1993
).
Each of these four mechanisms would produce characteristic features in
single-channel recordings. First, a channel block mechanism would be
reflected in reduced single-channel open time and/or amplitude
(depending on the rate of channel block and unblock) by DMPP. Extremely
rapid transitions to a blocked state that are fast enough to achieve a
frequency that would effectively reduce the macroscopic peak amplitude
by >80% also would cause an apparent reduction in single-channel
amplitude even if reduced open time could not be resolved.
Alternatively, longer-lived blocked transitions with a sufficient
blocking rate and duration to account for the dramatic reduction in
efficacy would undoubtedly reduce the channel open time and/or open
frequency. It would probably be impossible to quantify the rate or
degree of block by DMPP due to limitations in the time resolution of
recording; but the difference would be detectable nevertheless.
Furthermore, considering that the longer duration openings would be
more susceptible to channel block transitions than the shorter events
that are not being resolved, the longer events that are detectable with
ACh would be reduced in duration or rendered undectable by channel
block when DMPP is agonist. Low frequency brief transitions that might
not be resolved by single-channel analysis would not be sufficient to cause the difference in efficacy. Other evidence to be considered when
evaluating a channel block mechanism that would not rely on
single-channel analysis would be noncompetitive inhibition when DMPP is
coapplied with ACh in macroscopic recordings of
7 and whether this
inhibition would be observed in recordings with
7/
8 chimeras that
have the channel domain of
8 as will be described below.
The second mechanism, a faster
by DMPP, would have an effect
similar to channel block in reducing channel open time leading to the
predictions described above. The reduction in open time would have to
be extreme to account for the >80% difference in efficacy. Because
the recordings are at the limits of time resolution, channels with open
times that are significantly faster would be missed altogether, which
would be reflected as a reduction in the channel open frequency.
The third possible mechanism, a faster desensitization rate for DMPP to
explain the >80% difference in efficacy for DMPP, would have to be
dramatic, and the impact on single-channel activity would depend on the
model for desensitization (i.e., whether out of
the open or closed channel state). Faster desensitization out of the
open channel state would result in dramatically reduced channel open
time and/or channel frequency much like what has been described for the
mechanisms of channel block or faster
. If faster
desensitization occurred out of the closed channel state, then the
difference in efficacy would appear as a reduction in open channel frequency.
The final possible kinetic mechanism, a slower channel opening rate by
DMPP, cannot be examined by measurements of single-channel dwell times
without prolonged steady state single-channel recording. This may not
be possible with the
7 AChR due to its propensity to desensitize as
well as the problem of irreversible channel inactivation that is
characteristic of neuronal nicotinic channels in outside-out patches,
which would hinder such an approach. An alternative approach would be
to activate channels in outside-out patches by high concentrations of
both DMPP and ACh to observe their respective abilities to cause
channel summation. A slower activation rate by DMPP would result in
less channel summation, which would correspond to the macroscopic
equivalent of partial efficacy. Furthermore, a slower activation rate
would predict a slower rise time for DMPP-activated channels compared
with ACh-activated channels that may be detectable from ensemble
averages of multiple applications of each agonist on a patch.
Single-channel properties of
7 AChRs.
To distinguish among
these possible kinetic mechanisms, we analyzed single-channel currents
activated by ACh and DMPP in patches isolated from oocytes expressing
7 AChRs. Applications of ACh or DMPP for 200 msec to outside-out
patches evoked a rapid succession of extremely brief single-channel
currents (fig. 1). Channel activity was
extremely rare when the whole-cell currents were <7 µA (at
50 mV
with 300 µM ACh) but were found in most membrane patches when the
macroscopic responses were >15 µA. Channel openings began after a
short delay (
10 msec) after a stimulus artifact. The delay was due
to the placement of the recording electrode away from the interface
between control and agonist solution (fig. 1). Channel activity ceased
either prior to the termination of agonist application (as a result of
desensitization) or within 5 to 10 msec after terminating the
application, depending on agonist concentration. At higher agonist
concentrations, more simultaneous multiple-channel openings occurred
and desensitization happened more rapidly. By using ACh or DMPP at 60 µM, channel activity usually was sustained throughout the duration of
the application and could be reactivated after
4 sec in control
solution. Channel "rundown" was evident during the course of
repetitive applications. Enough data to perform kinetic analysis was
obtained by repetitively evoking channel activity by these brief
agonist applications. When possible, both ACh and DMPP were tested on
the same patch (n = 3).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
7 AChR single-channel currents activated by ACh
or DMPP have identical mean open times. Top, rapid application of ACh
or DMPP for 200 msec to outside-out patches from oocytes expressing
7 AChRs evoked channel activity having extremely rapid open
kinetics. Segments of each response to agonist application are also
shown on an expanded time scale to illustrate the rapid kinetics. The
solid bar above each trace represents the activation period of the
application system. The delay between activation and the initial
channel activity represents the distance traveled through the control
solution into the agonist solution. The large current spikes are
stimulator artifacts. Traces showing the entire application period were
filtered at 3 kHz, while the expanded traces are shown at 7 kHz because
this was the filter frequency for kinetic analysis. Bottom,
representative channel open time histograms showing the distributions
of channel open times activated by ACh or DMPP. Fits of the
distributions to single-component exponential functions show that the
mean channel open times for 7 AChRs activated by either agonist are
the same. All primary data shown are from the same patch while the mean
open time values reflect the fits from 4 or 5 patches. In all cases,
the holding potential was 80 mV.
|
|
No significant differences in channel open times or amplitudes were
seen when comparing channels activated by ACh or DMPP (fig. 1). Channel
open time distributions were usually best fit by single-exponential
functions with time constants of 0.11 ± 0.001 msec for ACh and
0.10 ± 0.004 msec for DMPP at
80 mV. These channel open times
are the same as what has been reported for a native
7 AChR recorded
under similar conditions from rat hippocampal neurons (Castro and
Albuquerque, 1993
). Since the open times for channels activated by ACh
or DMPP are essentially identical, the channel closing rate
- and
the channel desensitization rate directly out of the open state
(k4) must be the same for channels
activated by each agonist (see scheme 1). Additionally, the identical
open times indicate that DMPP does not act as a channel blocker because channel block would appear as a shorter channel duration for DMPP. Channels activated by each agonist had similar amplitude distributions and demonstrated the presence of at least two channel conductances (data not shown). For ACh at
80 mV, the open channel amplitude distributions were fit best by Gaussian functions having constants of
3.4 ± 0.1 (n = 4),
2.4 (n = 2), and
4.6 pA (n = 1). All patches had at least the
3.4 pA channel. For DMPP (60 µM), the channel amplitudes were
3.5 ± 0.2 and
2.5 ± 0.1 pA (n = 4 for both). This indicated that the agonists showed no differential preference for activating different conductance channels. Additionally, the similar amplitudes indicate that DMPP was not causing extremely rapid block and unblock that could not be kinetically resolved due to
filtering. Open probabilities were similar for both agonists at
concentrations of 60 µM, which is twice the
EC50 for DMPP and one half the
EC50 for ACh, indicating that the rate of
desensitization out of any state for DMPP was not significantly
different than for ACh. Measurements of channel open frequencies were
made during the applications of each agonist and the resulting
frequency profiles (i.e. number of events per
unit of time) were fit with an exponential probability density function
(data not shown). The decay of this function represents the
desensitization time constant at this concentration of agonist. The
time constants were 20 msec for ACh-activated channels and 18 msec for
DMPP-activated channels. In addition to different desensitization
rates, the similar profile of channel frequencies during agonist
applications also argue against long duration block transitions or
faster channel closures by DMPP that might have been undetectable by
open time analysis since this would cause an acceleration (smaller time
constants) in the decay of the channel opening frequencies for DMPP
compared with ACh. Collectively, these results showed that DMPP was not a channel blocker, that DMPP did not activate a lower conductance channel and that channels activated by DMPP did not have a faster channel closing or desensitization rate than those activated by ACh.
More evidence against a channel blocking mechanism will be provided in
later sections using macroscopic recordings and AChR chimeras.
Channel summation (i.e., simultaneous channel
openings resulting in macroscopic-like responses) was used to determine
whether a difference in
could account for the difference in
efficacy between DMPP and ACh. Using concentrations of DMPP that would saturate binding avoided complications due to subsaturating conditions and allowed for possible kinetic mechanisms to be explored. First, single applications of high concentrations of DMPP (150-300 µM) caused less channel summation than did the same concentration of ACh
(fig. 2, left). This experiment
demonstrated that partial efficacy of DMPP could be observed in
isolated patches. Second, in different experiments aimed at resolving
the underlying kinetic difference between ACh and DMPP in causing
channel summation to occur, ensemble averages of repetitive agonist
applications (fig 2, right) show that the rise to peak of the averaged
current was much slower for DMPP and that the peak of the average
response for DMPP was much lower than for ACh. These results suggested that its lower efficacy compared with that of ACh was due to a slower
channel activation rate (
in scheme 1) by DMPP.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Saturating concentrations of agonists show partial
efficacy of DMPP on 7 AChRs in outside-out patches. Left, from top
to bottom are sequential applications of saturating concentrations of
ACh or DMPP to the same outside-out patch from an oocyte expressing
7 AChRs. The gray bar above each trace represents the time during
which the agonist applicator is activated, with the delay to first
opening representing the movement of the control solution over the tip
of the recording electrode into the agonist solution. The large current
spikes on either side of the bar are stimulator artifacts. The time
between each application was 2 min. The peak amplitude of
simultaneous channel opening was greater for ACh compared with DMPP,
reflecting the partial efficacy of DMPP in activating 7 AChRs in
outside-out patches. The holding potential was 80 mV. Right, for a
different outside-out patch than is shown in the left, ensemble
averages of multiple applications of saturating concentrations of ACh
or DMPP were constructed. The average traces represent 10 applications
of ACh and 11 applications of DMPP. The peak amplitude of the average
ACh response was larger than that of DMPP, whereas the onset of the
current for DMPP had a slower rise to peak and was delayed. The holding
potential was 80 mV.
|
|
In addition to the slower rise to peak for DMPP, a longer delay before
channel activation by DMPP was observed (fig. 2, right) in several
patches where both agonists were tested at high concentrations. This
delay in onset of channel activation suggests that a more complex
activation mechanism than is depicted by scheme 1 is likely to be
involved. Nevertheless, the slower rise to peak for DMPP is entirely
consistent with a smaller
.
Analysis of
7/
8 subunit chimeras: determinants of efficacy
and potency.
To determine which regions of
7 and
8 subunits
account for the observed differences in efficacy and
EC50 between ACh and DMPP, a series of chimeric
7/
8 subunits were expressed as homomers in Xenopus
oocytes. Their functional properties with respect to activation by ACh
and DMPP were compared with those of the
7 and
8 AChRs (table
1).
The degree to which the N-terminal extracellular domain alone governed
the pharmacological properties of
7 and
8 AChRs was tested by
constructing a chimeric subunit containing the whole N-terminal
extracellular domain from the
7 subunit (residues 1-208) fused to
residues 209 through the C-terminus of the
8 subunit. Responses of
these
7(1-208)/
8 AChRs to various concentrations of ACh and DMPP
were measured at holding potentials of
30 mV to
70 mV. This chimera
exhibited pharmacological properties similar to
7 AChRs (fig.
3 and table
1). In particular, DMPP was a partial agonist. The close pharmacological similarity between
7 and
7(1-208)/
8 AChRs indicated that amino acids within the
N-terminal extracellular domain of these subunits largely determine the
pharmacological differences between
7 and
8 AChRs.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Comparison of agonist efficacies and potencies for
the various 7 and 8 subunit chimeras. Shown on top are
representations of 7 AChRs, chimeric 7(1-208)/ 8 AChRs,
7(1-115)/ 8 AChRs, 7(1-179)/ 8 AChR, 8(1-114)/
7(115-179)/ 8 AChRs and 8 AChRs. Open boxes represent regions of
the 8 subunit and hatched boxes represent regions of the 7
subunit. Black boxes represent the transmembrane domains. Numbering
refers to residues in the mature 7 and 8 subunit. Typical
responses to 2 sec applications (depicted by gray bars) of various
concentrations of ACh or DMPP are shown below each representation for
that AChR expressed in oocytes. The responses shown for ACh and DMPP
are from different oocytes, but the DMPP response in each case is
normalized to the maximal ACh response elicited by a single application
of saturating concentration of ACh to that oocyte. Each point on the
concentration-response relationship represents the normalized mean
value from at least three different oocytes and is accompanied by the
fit to a Hill equation. The error bars represent the standard error of
the mean. The holding potentials ranged between 30 ( 7 only) and
70 mV depending on peak current amplitudes.
|
|
A more precise definition of regions within the N-terminal
extracellular domain that dictate the differences in pharmacological properties between
7 and
8 AChRs was sought by constructing a
chimeric subunit containing only the N-terminal 115 amino acid residues
of the
7 subunit fused to amino acid residues 116 through the
C-terminus of the
8 subunit. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties similar to
8 AChRs (fig. 3 and table 1). DMPP was fully
efficacious. The close pharmacological similarity between
8 and
7(1-115)/
8 AChRs indicated that amino acid residues 1-115 were
not sufficient to determine the pharmacological differences observed
between
7 and
8 AChRs.
To establish the extent of
7 sequence necessary to confer the
pharmacological properties of
7 AChRs to chimeric
7/
8 AChRs, the N-terminal 179 amino acid residues of the
7 subunit were fused
to amino acid residues 180 through the C-terminus of the
8 subunit.
This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties of both
7 and
8
AChRs: like
7 AChRs, DMPP was a partial agonist; but the
EC50 values were similar to
8 AChRs (fig. 3
and table 1). Thus, this chimera delineated two different regions of
these subunits, one corresponding to residues 1-179 that conveys the partial efficacy of DMPP and the other corresponding to residues 180-208 that affects the EC50 values of both ACh
and DMPP.
Because a major transition in the efficacy of activation by DMPP, but
not in the EC50 values for activation by either
DMPP or ACh, was observed between the
7(1-115)/
8 AChRs and the
7(1-179)/
8 AChRs, a fourth chimeric subunit was constructed to
assess the contributions of residues 115-179. A chimeric subunit in
which amino acid residues 115-179 from the
8 subunit were replaced with the corresponding residues from the
7 subunit was constructed. This chimera exhibited pharmacological properties similar to
8 AChRs
(fig. 3 and table 1). The similarity of the pharmacological profile of
8(1-114)/
7(115-179)/
8 AChRs to that of
8 AChRs demonstrated that the partial efficacy of DMPP was dependent on the
simultaneous presence of residues within region 1-115 and region
116-179.
Residues within region 180-208 governing the
EC50 values of ACh and DMPP were further analyzed
by site-directed mutagenesis. Starting with the
7 subunit, each of
the nonconserved residues between
7 and
8 subunits that were
located with the region affecting the agonist
EC50 values was mutated from the
7 residue to
the corresponding
8 residue (T/N184, S/L186, F/Y187, I/V198, F/Y200 and V/I202). Each singly mutated subunit then was expressed as a
homomeric AChR. The measured EC50 values and the
efficacies for both ACh and DMPP were not significantly different from
those of wild type
7 AChRs (data not shown). The double mutant F187 to Y187 and F200 to Y200 also exhibited a profile very similar to that
of the wild type
7 AChRs. The difference in agonist
EC50 values between
7 and
8 AChRs,
therefore, did not result from any single residue difference but rather
was the result of multiple interactions between the agonists and some
combination of the six nonconserved residues.
DMPP competitively inhibits ACh-activated currents.
To confirm
that DMPP was acting only through the agonist binding site, we examined
whether its interaction with ACh on
7 AChRs was competitive.
Responses to various concentrations of ACh applied alone and coapplied
with different concentrations of DMPP were measured as shown in figure
4. In the presence of both its
EC50 (30 µM) and at saturating concentrations
of DMPP (300 µM), the activation of
7 AChRs by ACh was inhibited
in a competitive manner. These results are consistent with DMPP acting solely through competition with ACh for the agonist binding site because any allosteric interaction including channel block by DMPP
would be revealed by a submaximal response at the higher end of the
concentration-response curve.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
DMPP and ACh interact competitively with 7
AChRs. The peak current elicited by ACh coapplied with either a
saturating concentration of 300 µM DMPP or an EC50
concentration of 30 µM DMPP was plotted as a function of the ACh
concentration. The peak response in each case is normalized to the peak
response at 1 mM ACh in the absence of DMPP. The concentration-response
curve for ACh is shifted to the right when going from 30 µM DMPP to
300 µM DMPP and ACh completely displaces DMPP to achieve its maximal
response, compatible with competitive inhibition. Each point on the
concentration-response relationship represents the normalized mean
value from at least three different oocytes and is accompanied by the
fit to a Hill equation. The error bars represent the standard error of
the mean. The holding potential was 50 mV.
|
|
Voltage dependence of the efficacy of DMPP.
We established
that the partial efficacy of DMPP with
7 AChRs was due to a slower
rate of activation (
in scheme 1) by DMPP compared with ACh.
Because that step in muscle AChR activation depends on transmembrane
potential (Chabala, 1992
; Sine and Steinbach, 1986
), we examined
whether the efficacy of DMPP on
7 AChRs also was voltage dependent.
The voltage dependence initially was revealed experimentally by the
strong deviation in the macroscopic current-voltage relationship for
DMPP from the ohmic relationship observed for ACh at negative holding
potentials (data not shown). To address this issue directly, the full
current-voltage relationships were recorded for
7 AChRs in response
to 1 mM ACh (Imax, ACh) or 3 mM DMPP
(Imax, DMPP) between
90 and +90 mV. The ratio
of these values (Imax, DMPP/Imax,
ACh) showed a strong voltage dependence (e-fold/35.5 mV) at
negative holding potentials, but little voltage dependence at positive
holding potentials (fig. 5). In addition, the efficacy of DMPP dramatically increased to >80% of ACh at positive potentials. In a different series of experiments, 300 µM
DMPP was used to inhibit
7 AChR responses elicited by 1 mM ACh at
holding potentials from
90 mV to +90 mV. Normalizing to the maximal
response elicited by 1 mM ACh alone from the same oocyte showed that
the inhibition by DMPP was strongly voltage dependent, being greater at
more negative holding potentials (data not shown). However, it should
be reiterated that the single-channel and chimera data described above
have completely eliminated the possibility of a channel block mechanism
for DMPP. Specifically, the mean open times and amplitudes for
DMPP-activated channels were identical to those activated by ACh at a
concentration of DMPP where its efficacy had peaked. Most persuasively,
DMPP is a partial agonist on chimeras having an
8 channel domain,
whereas DMPP with the full-length
8 AChR is a full agonist.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The efficacy of DMPP is voltage dependent. The
ratio of the maximal response at a saturating concentration of 3 mM
DMPP (Imax, DMPP) to the maximal response a saturating
concentration of 1 mM ACh (Imax, ACh) elicited on 7
AChRs ( ) and chimeric 7(1-179)/ 8 AChRs ( ) is plotted as a
function of the holding potential from 90 mV to +90 mV. The data
points from responses at negative holding potentials are fitted to an
exponential function with the slope of the fit representing the voltage
dependence of DMPP efficacy.
|
|
Because the efficacy of DMPP is governed by the region 1-179 of the
extracellular domain, we questioned whether the voltage dependence of
the efficacy was controlled by this region as well or if this region
simply revealed an intrinsic property of the gating of
7 AChRs. To
this end, the maximal response elicited by 1 mM ACh alone and by 3 mM
DMPP alone was measured as a function of the holding potential from
oocytes expressing chimeric
7(1-179)/
8 AChRs. The ratio of
Imax, DMPP to Imax, ACh for
7(1-179)/
8 AChRs exhibited nearly the same voltage dependence
(e-fold/32 mV) at negative holding potentials as
7 AChRs and little
voltage dependence at positive potentials (fig. 5). However, unlike
7 AChRs, for which the efficacy of DMPP approached that of ACh at
positive potentials, the efficacy of DMPP on
7(1-179)/
8 AChRs
remained <20% of that for ACh, even at +90 mV. Because the
7(1-179)/
8 chimera derives all four transmembrane domains
(M1-M4) from the
8 subunit, the nearly identical voltage dependence
suggests that residues that are responsible for the voltage sensitivity
of gating of these AChRs are conserved between the
7 and the
8
subunits and are probably located within their transmembrane domains.
By contrast, the regions that govern the magnitude of
(the
intrinsic voltage insensitive component) were unique to their
respective AChRs.
 |
Discussion |
We demonstrated that region 1-179 within the
7 AChR N-terminal
extracellular domain affects efficacy of DMPP. This region, when
swapped into
8 AChRs, converts the efficacy of DMPP from full to
partial that is characteristic of its action on
7 AChRs. Partial
efficacy is due to a slower opening rate
. By comparison, region 180-208 affects EC50 values. These two
regions appear to be modular because their effects segregate
independently in chimeras. We also conclude that the opening rate
is voltage dependent, suggesting that extracellular region
1-179 in addition to transmembrane regions that contain gating charges
affect
.
Partial efficacy of DMPP was not due to channel blockade or a faster
channel closing rate
for DMPP. DMPP caused a parallel rightward shift in ACh concentration-response curves for
7 AChRs without reducing maximal response. Furthermore, the
7 extracellular domain confers partial efficacy to chimeras having the
8 channel domain, and DMPP is a full agonist on
8. These results eliminated allosteric sites for DMPP including channel blockade as possible mechanisms, leaving only differences in microscopic rates as potential mechanisms. We recorded single-channel currents to determine which rate
constants for activation of
7 AChRs could account for partial efficacy of DMPP. Open times of
7 AChRs were similar for the two
agonists, ruling out faster
and channel block because these would have caused shorter open times. Furthermore, unitary current amplitudes for DMPP-activated channels were not different from those
for ACh-activated channels.
Possible mechanisms, therefore, were narrowed to either a faster
desensitization rate out of the closed state (but not the open state)
or a decreased rate of activation by DMPP compared with ACh. These
possibilities were distinguished by decay in channel opening frequency
during agonist application.
7 AChR channels activated at lower
agonist concentrations (60 µM) decayed in frequency with time
constants of 20 msec for ACh and 18 msec for DMPP. Differences in
channel desensitization rates were, therefore, not significant.
Partial efficacy of DMPP was best explained by a slower activation rate
. Onsets of opening (first latency) on agonist applications (150 µM ACh or DMPP) were different. Because binding steps were saturated by high DMPP concentration,
for DMPP compared with ACh accounted best for differences in efficacy. Slower
disfavors formation of the open state by DMPP, reducing its efficacy.
Efficacy of DMPP should be increased by manipulations that favor
formation of the open state, thus offsetting a reduced
.
Interestingly, ivermectin, an anthelmintic, almost completely restores
the efficacy of DMPP by stabilizing the open state of
7 AChRs
(Krause et al., 1998
). These kinetics classify DMPP as a
true partial agonist on chicken
7 AChRs, distinguishing it from
partial agonists arising from other mechanisms. A similar conclusion
was reached for activation of muscle AChRs by decamethonium, although
channel block complicated the interpretation (Liu and Dilger, 1993
).
High-sequence identity between
7 and
8 subunits (Schoepfer
et al., 1990
) facilitated mapping of regions determining
differences in efficacy for DMPP, as well as differences in apparent
affinity for ACh and DMPP. Only 47 residues are not conserved in the
N-terminal extracellular domain of
7 and
8 subunits. They have
identical residues in M2 and differ in M1 by 1 residue, in M3 by 3 residues, in the large cytoplasmic domain by 83 residues, in M4 by 6 residues, and in the C-terminus by two residues.
Region 1-179 was a sufficient determinant of efficacy of DMPP. Because
proximity to the agonist binding site would seem required for
distinguishing ACh from DMPP, it is reassuring that photoaffinity labeling and mutagenesis using Torpedo AChRs identified at
least three homologous residues within this region that lie near the binding site:
1 W149,
W57 and
D174 (Changeux et
al., 1992
). Interestingly, no difference between efficacy of ACh
and DMPP was observed in the chimera
8(1-114)/
7(115-179)/
8,
suggesting that nonconserved amino acids within region 115-179 are not
sole determinants of partial efficacy of DMPP. Instead, amino acids within region 1-115 of
7 also are required. To account for partial efficacy of DMPP, two or more of the 41 nonconserved amino acid residues within region 1-179 must interact together with DMPP to
interfere with structural transitions for activation.
Based on the presumed similarity in secondary and tertiary structure
between muscle AChRs and
7/
8 AChRs, we used a model of mouse
muscle AChR extracellular domain (Tsigelny et al., 1997
) to
suggest a subset of 14 nonconserved residues between
7 and
8 that
may be nearest the binding site at the interface between subunits (fig.
6). These nonconserved residues of
7/
8 within 20 Å of bound DMPP in the model include Y/H151,
G/S152, S/L155 and L/I156 on the
1-equivalent subunit and Y/E32,
F/L33, T/Q34, M/L38, T/I51, I/A54, T/V61, H/I63, H/S115 and G/N167 on
the
- and
-equivalent subunits. The pi-pi
interactions between DMPP and aromatic residues of the AChR at
positions 32, 33 and 151 may be important in slowing conformational
changes triggered by DMPP binding, resulting in a slower
.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Nonconserved residues of 7 that may contribute
to the pharmacological differences of ACh and DMPP on 7 and 8
AChRs. A model of the extracellular domain (residues 31-200, based on
mouse muscle AChR) of nicotinic AChRs (Tsigelny et al.,
1997 ) was used to find nonconserved residues that may be within 20 Å of the agonist binding site. Top, the -carbon trace of the original
muscle AChR model as viewed from the extracellular face with the
placement of DMPP at the interface between the 1 and subunits
and on the vector between 1 C192 ( 7 C190) and D174 ( 7
D164) (Karlin and Akabas, 1995 ). The muscle subunits are labeled ,
, and . A region of 20 Å radius centered on the tertiary
nitrogen of DMPP is indicated by the circle. With residues renumbered
by primary sequence similarity according to the 7 sequence, segments
in the model with carbon atoms within 20 Å of DMPP included
residues 110-111, 148-155 and 181-194 from the 1-equivalent
subunit and residues 31-41, 45-48, 52-65 and 164-171 from
-equivalent subunit. Similar, although not identical, segments at
the - -equivalent interface of the model were residues 136-137,
150-158 and 181-194 from the 1-equivalent subunit and residues
31-39, 44-46, 48-65, 109-111, 113-115 and 164-170 from the
-equivalent subunit. Bottom, region around DMPP and displays the
heavy atoms of the following 12 residues of 7 that are not conserved
between 7 and 8: Y/H151, G/S152, S/L155 and L/I156 on the
1-equivalent subunits and Y/E32, F/L33, T/Q34, M/L38, I/A54, T/V61,
H/I63 and G/N167 on the -equivalent subunit. The -carbons of
residues C190 and D164 also are labeled as reference points. Numbering
of the residues in the lower panel is based on the 7 sequence.
Similar analysis with DMPP at the 1/ interface added T/I51 and
H/S115 of the -equivalent subunit to form the subset of 14 nonconserved residues that are close to the agonist binding site in the
model and, therefore, that may have a high likelihood of contributing
to the pharmacological differences between ACh and DMPP on 7 and
8 AChRs.
|
|
A second region, 180-208, determines differences in activation
EC50 values of
7 and
8 AChRs between ACh
and DMPP. This region contains residues that previously were identified
as contributing to agonist binding including Y190, C192, C193 and Y198
(Bertrand et al., 1992
; Changeux et al., 1992
). A
combination of two or more of the six nonconserved residues (184, 186, 187, 198, 200 and 202) within this region accounts for the differences
in EC50 values, since EC50
values were not significantly altered when these residues were mutated individually.
Numerical modeling of concentration-response curves confirmed that our
kinetic and structural interpretations were consistent with scheme 1 (fig. 7). Differences in opening rates
for ACh and DMPP were sufficient to account for differences in
efficacy. Moreover, simulations showed that opening rate and agonist
binding properties that segregated with regions 1-179 and 180-208,
respectively, accounted for observed efficacies and
EC50 values of DMPP on
7,
8 and chimeric
7(1-179)/
8 AChRs. These results are consistent with region
180-208 affecting EC50 through contributions to
ligand binding.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Numerical modeling of AChR concentration-response
curves for DMPP. Numerical simulations of concentration-response curves
for DMPP with 7 AChRs, 8 AChRs and chimeric 7(1-179)/ 8
AChRs are consistent with the assignment of gating effects to region
1-179 and binding effects to region 180-208. The simulations
according to linear activation scheme 1 (see Methods) were derived from
computed relative peak currents as a function of agonist concentration.
The peak DMPP currents were normalized to the ACh-evoked peak current
at saturation, which was assumed to be the same for 7, 8 and
chimeric 7(1-179)/ 8 AChRs. The intrinsic equilibrium
dissociation constants of the two agonist binding sites were assumed to
be equal within each AChR molecule. The closing rate
was fixed at 10,000 sec 1 in agreement with
our single-channel data. Rate constants for the binding steps and the
opening rate for ACh were approximated from
single-channel analysis that was reported for similar steps of the
muscle-type AChR expressed in fibroblasts (Sine et al.,
1990 ). The desensitization rate k4 (100 sec 1), recovery rate
k-4 (0.02 sec 1),
association rate k1 (1.6 × 108 M 1
sec 1) and association rate
k2 (8 × 107
M 1 sec 1) were the
same for all three AChRs for both ACh and DMPP. ACh-specific rates for
7 AChR: k-1 = 14,000 sec 1, k-2 = 28,000 sec 1, = 45,000 sec 1; for 8 AChR: k-1 = 100 sec 1, k-2 = 200 sec 1, = 45,000 sec 1. DMPP-specific rates for 7 AChR:
k-1 = 1800 sec 1,
k-2 = 3600 sec 1,
= 1500 sec 1; for 8
AChR: k-1 =& |
|