JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koek, W.
Right arrow Articles by Colpaert, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koek, W.
Right arrow Articles by Colpaert, F. C.

Vol. 287, Issue 1, 266-283, October 1998

F 11440, a Potent, Selective, High Efficacy 5-HT1A Receptor Agonist with Marked Anxiolytic and Antidepressant Potential

W. Koek, J.-F. Patoiseau, M.-B. Assié, C. Cosi, M. S. Kleven, E. Dupont-Passelaigue, E. Carilla-Durand, C. Palmier, J.-P. Valentin, G. John, P. J. Pauwels, J.-P. Tarayre and F. C. Colpaert

Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Castres Cedex, France


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

F 11440 (4-methyl-2-[4-(4-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-piperazino)-butyl]-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazin-3,5-dione) was the outcome of a research effort guided by the hypothesis that the magnitude of the intrinsic activity of agonists at 5-HT1A receptors determines the magnitude of their antidepressant and anxiolytic-like effects. The affinity of F 11440 for 5-HT1A binding sites (pKi, 8.33) was higher than that of buspirone (pKi, 7.50), and somewhat lower than that of flesinoxan (pKi, 8.91). In vivo, F 11440 was 4- to 20-fold more potent than flesinoxan, and 30- to 60-fold more potent than buspirone, in exerting 5-HT1A agonist activity at pre- and postsynaptic receptors in rats (measured by, for example, its ability to decrease hippocampal extracellular serotonin (5-HT) levels and to increase plasma corticosterone levels, respectively). F 11440 did not have detectable antidopaminergic activity (unlike buspirone, which inhibited all of the directly observable behavioral effects of methylphenidate in rats), showed no evidence of antihistaminergic activity (unlike flesinoxan, which protected against the effects of a histamine aerosol in guinea pigs), and had a 70-fold separation between its 5-HT1A agonist and alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist properties (measured as the ability to inhibit the methoxamineinduced increase in blood pressure in rats), unlike flesinoxan, which showed a <3-fold separation. In HeLa cells expressing human 5-HT1A receptors, F 11440 decreased the forskolin-induced increase in AMP, and, based on its maximal effect, was found to have an intrinsic activity of 1.0 relative to that of 5-HT, which was significantly higher than that of buspirone (0.49), ipsapirone (0.46) and flesinoxan (0.93). Consistent with the aforementioned hypothesis, F 11440 produced anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in animal models (i.e., increased punished responding in a pigeon conflict procedure and decreased immobility in a rat forced swimming test, respectively) that were more substantial than those of buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan. Thus, F 11440, shown here to be a potent, selective, high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist, appears to have the potential to exert marked anxiolytic and antidepressant activity in humans.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

 Antidepressants and benzodiazepine-type anxiolytics are among the most commonly prescribed therapeutic agents. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, induce fewer side effects than the "classic" antidepressants that were introduced in the 1950s (i.e., MAO inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants), their clinical efficacy is similarly limited: that is, they have a slow onset of action (i.e., 2-4 weeks) and they are effective in only ~70% of depressed patients, less than half of whom show a full response (see reviews by, for example, Broekkamp et al., 1995; Möller and Volz, 1996; Frazer, 1997). For the treatment of anxiety, the benzodiazepines, introduced in the 1960s, have largely replaced barbiturates and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives, primarily because of their safety; their clinical efficacy, however, is limited (see Rickels et al., 1978; Greenblatt et al., 1983a, 1983b; Rosenbaum, 1982). Thus, currently available treatments for depression and anxiety, although being safer and having fewer side effects, do not appear to be markedly more efficacious than the antidepressants and anxiolytics that were discovered in the 1950-60s. That advances in terms of improved clinical efficacy have as yet to be made is perhaps not surprising inasmuch as the mechanisms of antidepressant and anxiolytic drug action have so far remained essentially unchanged [i.e., indirect stimulation of monoaminergic systems to exert antidepressant effects, and potentiation of gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic systems to exert anxiolytic effects]. Perhaps, agents acting by other mechanisms will prove more efficacious than the currently available treatments.

One novel molecular target has become apparent with the introduction of buspirone for the treatment of anxiety, and also, of depression (see reviews by, for example, Tunnicliff et al., 1991; Fulton and Brogden, 1997). Buspirone, and its analogues gepirone and ipsapirone, activate directly a particular subtype of 5-HT receptor, the 5-HT1A receptor. Their clinical efficacy, however, is not an improvement over that of other available treatments (e.g., Deakin, 1993). Several hypotheses have guided the search for 5-HT1A agonists with enhanced activity in animal models of anxiety and depression. One such hypothesis is that the combination of 5-HT1A agonist with 5-HT2 antagonist properties confers a more advantageous therapeutic profile (Barrett and Vanover, 1993; Millan and Brocco, 1993), and several compounds thought to possess such a combination have been described [e.g., WY 50,324 (Barrett and Vanover, 1993), and S 14671 (Millan et al., 1992)]. Recent results (Kleven and Koek, 1996), however, failed to confirm empirically the alleged superiority of mixed 5-HT1A agonists/5-HT2 antagonists and showed, for example, that the anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT1A agonists in animals were not markedly enhanced by the 5-HT2 antagonist, ritanserin.

Our research has been guided by the hypothesis that the magnitude of the psychotropic activity of 5-HT1A receptor ligands (i.e., their clinical efficacy) is a direct, positive function of the magnitude of their intrinsic activity at the receptor. This relationship has been established, in the laboratory, for the anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT1A ligands (Colpaert et al., 1992), and evidence presented here suggests that this relationship exists also for their antidepressant-like effects (see also De Vry, 1995, 1996). This relationship between clinical efficacy and intrinsic activity may explain why buspirone and its analogues, gepirone and ipsapirone, have limited clinical efficacy; these compounds activate the 5-HT1A receptor only weakly and are generally considered to be partial 5-HT1A agonists. In contrast with buspirone, greater activation is achieved with flesinoxan (e.g., Boddeke et al., 1992). The latter compound is in phase III trials; it will be of interest to learn about its clinical efficacy, but flesinoxan's intrinsic activity may still be limited and inferior to that of 5-HT itself (McCall et al., 1994; Hadrava et al., 1995).

The purpose of our drug discovery effort has been to identify novel 5-HT1A ligands possessing an intrinsic activity higher than that of buspirone and flesinoxan. Here, we report results obtained with F 11440 (4-methyl-2-[4-(4-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-piperazino)-butyl]-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazin-3,5-dione; fig. 1), which is shown to be a potent, selective, high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist with marked antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like activity in preclinical models and, thus, with the potential to exert antidepressant and anxiolytic activity in humans that may be more substantial than that of currently available treatments.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Chemical structure of 4-methyl-2-[4-(4-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-piperazino)-butyl]-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazin-3,5-dione (F 11440), in comparison with those of buspirone, flesinoxan and 8-OH-DPAT.

Most cases of depressive disorders occur in people with a history of other disorders, most frequently anxiety (e.g., Kessler et al., 1996). It has been hypothesized that impaired serotonergic mechanisms underlie depression preceded by anxiety, and that serotonergically acting anxiolytics, such as 5-HT1A agonists, will be the treatment of choice in such "anxiety-driven" depression (Van Praag, 1996). If well tolerated in humans, F 11440 may be one of the most pertinent, currently available tools to test this hypothesis.

    Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Ico: OFA SD [IOPS Caw], Iffa Credo, l'Arbresle, France), weighing 160 to 200 g on arrival, were group housed (five animals per cage) with food and water freely available in a quarantine room for 4 to 8 days before being used in the experiments. Thereafter, they were housed individually in hanging cages (length × width × height: 28 × 21 × 18 cm; Iffa Credo, France) with metal grid floors, in the room where the experiments were conducted, with unlimited access to filtered (0.22 µm) water and, except when stated otherwise, standard laboratory food (UAR A03; UAR, Epinay/s/Orge, France). For the forced swimming test, male Wistar rats (Rj: WISTAR (AF), Centre d'Elevage Roger Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were used. They were housed in groups of five in plastic cages (41 × 25 × 14 cm) containing wood shavings, with free access to food (UAR 113) and water until tested.

Male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (Hartley Crl: (HA), Charles River, Elbeuf, France), weighing 310 to 490 g, were on arrival group housed (nine animals per cage) in plastic cages (55 × 37 × 39 cm) containing wood shavings, in a quarantine room, for 4 to 5 days before use in the experiments. The animals were transferred to the room where the experiments were conducted on the day before the experiment began and were maintained under the same conditions as during quarantine.

Male White Carneau pigeons (Palmetto Pigeon Plant, Sumter, SC), weighing 500 to 650 g, were housed individually in metal cages (46 × 30 × 40 cm) with unlimited access to water, crushed oyster shell grit and, except when stated otherwise, food (Purina pigeon pellets 0310, Purina, France).

All animals were housed in environmentally controlled rooms (21 ± 1°C, relative humidity: 55 ± 5%) under a 12-hr light dark-cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.), both during quarantine and during the experiments. The experimental procedures were in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC) and the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NRC, 1996) and were approved by the institutional Protocol Review Committee.

Radioligand binding. Binding affinities for the different receptors were determined by means of ligand displacement assays using the conditions summarized in table 1. The reactions were stopped by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/B glass-fiber filters, and the filters were washed with appropriate buffer. The radioactivity retained on the filters was measured by scintillation spectroscopy in 4 ml scintillation fluid (Emulsifier Safe, Packard). All experiments were performed in triplicate, except H1, h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D binding, which were performed in duplicate. IC50 values were determined using nonlinear regression, except the IC50 values for h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors, which were obtained by interpolation. Ki values were calculated using the equation Ki = IC50 (1 + [C]/KD), and the results were expressed as mean pKi values ± S.E.M. of three independent determinations (two determinations if pKi < 5.0).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Experimental details for each of the binding assays

cAMP in HA7 cells. The HeLa cell line permanently transfected with the human 5-HT1A receptor gene and permanently expressing the 5-HT1A receptor protein (HA7) as described by Fargin et al. (1989) was commercially obtained from Duke University (Durham, NC). HA7 cells were grown in DMEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, gentamicin (100 µg/ml), geneticin (G418) (400 µg/ml) in 5% CO2 at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere. The cells were plated in six-well culture plates and used in the experiments at a confluency of 80% to 90%. Culturing medium (DMEM, 10% fetal calf serum, gentamicin 100 µg/ml, G418 400 µl/ml) was replaced by DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum without antibiotics 24 hr before experimentation.

Cells were preincubated with DMEM, 10 mM HEPES for 10 min at room temperature. Drugs, at concentrations ranging from 0.1 nM to 100 µM, and appropriate vehicle controls (i.e., water or DMSO), were then added in DMEM, 10 mM HEPES, 100 µM forskolin and 100 µM IBMX to the cells. Antagonists were added at the same time as the agonists, as described by Fargin et al. (1989). At the end of the treatment (10 min, room temperature), the reaction was stopped by aspiration of the medium and addition of 0.1 N HCl. Cellular extract was diluted 1:500 or 1:400 in radioimmunoassay buffer, and cAMP content was measured by using a commercially available kit (Dupont NEN: NEK-033). Basal cAMP levels were 10 ± 0.9 pmol/well (n = 8).

Concentration-effect relationships were expressed as -log [M] of the test compound vs. the cAMP content expressed as a percentage of forskolin-stimulated cAMP control values. IC50 values for compounds were estimated by linear interpolation between the logarithms of the concentrations that inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP with amounts bordering 50% of the maximal inhibition observed with the compound. The potency values represent the mean of three to five independent determinations, each performed in triplicate.

In subsequent experiments, the maximum effect of F 11440 was compared with those of other compounds by repeated testing (n = 9) at a concentration of 10-5 M (i.e., a concentration at which the reference compounds used here appeared to attain their maximal effects) in a first series of experiments and at 10-4 M in a second series. Data from each series were analyzed statistically by means of a one-way analysis of variance followed by sequential paired comparisons by means of Newman-Keuls tests (Winer, 1971); P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Note that the relative maximal responses of agonists cannot be directly equated to efficacy except by their rank order (i.e., the agonist that produces the larger maximal response possesses the greater efficacy) (Kenakin, 1993). Thus, possible relations between the maximal effects observed here and other measures were examined not only by calculating Pearson's product-moment correlation (r) but also by calculating Spearman's rank correlation (rs).

In vivo microdialysis. The methods have been described previously (Assié and Koek, 1996). A probe (CMA/12, 2 mm length, 0.5 mm diameter, CMA, Microdialysis AB) was implanted into the left hippocampus [stereotaxic coordinates: rostral -4.8 mm, lateral +4.6 mm, ventral -7.5 mm, from bregma and dura surface according to Paxinos and Watson (1986)] of anesthetized rats (chloral hydrate, 400-500 mg/kg i.p., and supplementary doses were used to maintain anesthesia). The probe was continuously perfused (1.1 µl/min) with artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing 1 µM of the selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor, citalopram. Starting approximately 2 hr after implantation, perfusates were collected every 20 min and analyzed directly for 5-HT content using high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (DECADE detector, ANTEC Leyden, The Netherlands).

Four base line control samples were collected before drug administration. When two drugs were tested, the second was injected 40 min after the first. Samples were collected for 140 min after administration of the last drug. At the end of the experiment, the animal was killed by decapitation and the brain was removed, frozen and cut in a cryomicrotome (Jung Frigocut 2800) to verify the position of the probe.

The perfusate levels of 5-HT are expressed as a percentage of the mean of amount of 5-HT collected in the four preinjection control samples (base line). The percent area under the curve (AUC) for the 140-min period after the administration of the compounds was used as a measure of drug effects. Treatment effects on percent AUC values were analyzed by means of one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test. ED50 values were estimated by linear interpolation (for agonists: vehicle control as 0% and maximal effect as 100%; for antagonists: agonist alone as 0% and vehicle control as 100%).

Stimulation of corticosterone secretion. Twenty-four hours before use in the experiments, rats were housed individually in a restricted area (accessible only to the experimenter) and received 15 g standard laboratory food (water continued to be available freely). Experiments, consisting of drug treatments after which animals were decapitated and trunk blood was collected, were conducted between 8:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Drugs (or vehicle) were administered 60 min before decapitation when given p.o., and 30 min before decapitation when given i.p. Antagonists were administered s.c., 30 min before the i.p. administration of agonists. Immediately before decapitation, animals were observed for the presence or absence of LLR.

Trunk blood was collected into chilled tubes containing 2.5% ethylenediamine tetracetic acid (0.2 M). The blood samples were centrifuged (2100 × g, 15 min, 4°C), and the plasma was aliquoted and stored at 20°C. Corticosterone levels were determined by means of an assay for CBG (Murphy, 1967). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.5 ng/tube.

The results obtained at each dose of each drug were expressed (1) as the mean (± S.E.M.) concentration of corticosterone (ng/ml plasma), and (2) as the percentage of rats showing a corticosterone concentration equal to or higher than a particular criterion value (i.e., 250 or 410 ng/ml, depending on whether the compound was administered p.o. or i.p., respectively); the criterion values were derived from the corticosterone levels observed in vehicle-treated controls (see Results). Based on the percentage measure, ED50 values and their associated confidence limits were calculated by the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon using the PHARM/PCS program by Tallarida and Murray (1987); when less than two intermediate percentages were observed, 0% and/or 100% effects were transformed by Berkson's adjustment (Hubert, 1984) to enable the use of the Litchfield-Wilcoxon procedure.

LLR and elements of the 5-HT syndrome. Twenty-four hours before use in the experiments, the animals were transferred to individual cages (described above) with water, but not food, freely available. The methods used were essentially the same as those described previously (Kleven et al., 1995). During the experiments, which took place between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m., rats were observed at two time points, centered at 15 and 60 min after the injection, and each lasting 10 min. During a 10-min period, an animal was observed once every min for 10 sec and the presence (1), or absence (0) of LLR and FPT was recorded. To be considered present, a sign had to occur uninterrupted for >= 3 sec. Because an animal was observed 10 times during a 10-min period, the incidence of a particular sign could vary from 0 to 10. FBP was scored present (1) if it occurred during the entire 10-min observation period; otherwise, the score was 0.

Dose-response functions were determined from the percentage of rats showing FPT or LLR scores of 1 or more, and the percentage of rats showing FBP. These criteria were based on the incidence of each particular behavior observed in control animals treated with saline (see Results). ED50 values and their associated confidence limits were calculated with the Litchfield-Wilcoxon procedure.

Drug discrimination. In addition to the food pellets obtained during the conditioning sessions, which were held between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday), rats received 10 g standard laboratory food per day, except during weekends when food was freely available from 5:00 p.m. on Friday until 2:00 p.m. on Sunday.

Using operant conditioning chambers (model E10-10, Coulbourn Instruments, Lehigh Valley, PA) equipped with two levers and a food pellet dispenser (model E14-12, Coulbourn Instruments), rats were trained to lever press for food (45-mg dustless pellets, Bioserv, Frenchtown, NJ) during daily, 15 min sessions. When an animal showed stable FR10 performance, drug discrimination training was started using a procedure detailed elsewhere (Koek et al., 1995). Fifteen minutes before each session, an injection of either the training dose of the training drug or saline was administered, and, depending on the injection condition, a food pellet was obtained under an FR10 schedule on the drug-appropriate lever (DL) or the saline-appropriate lever (SL), respectively. The sum of the responses made on either lever before the first reinforcement occurred (FRF) was recorded. Daily training drug (D) or saline (S) injections were given according to two, monthly alternating sequences, i.e., (1) DSSDS, SDDSS, SDSDD, DSDSD and (2) SDDSS, DSDSD, DSSDD, SDSDS. Discrimination training was continued until less than three responses were made on the injection-inappropriate lever, before the first food presentation, during 10 consecutive sessions (FRF < 13).

During 15 min test sessions, which were conducted once per week on Wednesday or Friday, the lever on which 10 responses accumulated first was defined as the selected lever. After lever selection, the animal received a first food pellet and subsequent reinforcement was made contingent on pressing the selected lever. Testing was postponed to the next scheduled test day if (1) on either of the two most recent training days, the FRF value exceeded 15, (2) on either of the two most recent training days, the response rate was <80% of the rate observed during the preceding training session of the same type (i.e., drug or saline), or (3) during the most recently preceding saline training session, the total number of responses was <500. Also, test data were discarded and the test condition later retested if the test session was followed by a training session during which the FRF value exceeded 15.

The test sessions generate data on the following two variables: (1) the selected lever, i.e., SL or DL, representing the measure of discriminative responding, and (2) the response rate, i.e., the total number of responses made on either lever during the 15 min session. Lever selection data were used to calculate for each treatment condition the percentage of animals selecting the DL; this percentage was calculated only when lever selection occurred in >50% of the animals tested. ED50 values were calculated by means of the Litchfield and Wilcoxon procedure. Response rate data were expressed as a percentage of the response rate during the most recently preceding saline training session. Drug effects on response rate were tested for statistical significance by using a randomization test for repeated measures (Siegel and Castellan, 1988).

Duration of action. The methods used were identical to those described above for the 5-HT syndrome, except that behavioral observations were conducted during six 10-min periods, centered at 10, 60, 120, 240 and 480 min after the injection. Dose-response functions were determined from the percentage of rats showing LLR scores of 1 or more. This criterion was based on the finding that an LLR score of 1 or more occurred in <5% of the control animals receiving saline orally (n = 130) during the observation period centered at 60 min after administration of saline. ED50 values and their associated confidence limits were calculated by means of the Litchfield and Wilcoxon procedure. Duration of action was estimated by calculating the ED50 value and 95% confidence limits at each time interval (10 min and 1, 2, 4 and 8 hr), and by plotting the log-ED50 values as a function of time. The duration of effect, defined as the time during which the ED50 was <4 times the minimum ED50 value, was estimated by linear interpolation of the empirical time-log-ED50 function.

Alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist properties. Experiments were carried out in rats (270-390 g) that had free access to water and standard laboratory food. On the day of the experiment, animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed on a heated table to maintain the rectal temperature at 37 ± 0.5°C. Animals underwent tracheotomy to allow spontaneous breathing. Catheters were inserted into the penile vein for infusing drugs and in the right carotid artery for continuous measurement of arterial pressure via a Statham P10EZ pressure transducer (Viggo-Spectromed, Oxnard, CA) connected to a Gould amplifier (Gould Instruments, France). The analog arterial pressure signal was digitized and simultaneously recorded by means of data acquisition software (AcqKnowledge, Biopac Systems Inc., Goleta, CA). Rats received an i.p. injection of either vehicle or a single dose of the test drug, and 30 min later, 0.16 mg/kg methoxamine or its vehicle was injected i.v.

Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Dose-response curves of compounds to inhibit the methoxamine-induced increase in mean arterial pressure were fitted using an operational sigmoid model (Marquardt, 1963). The ID50 refers to the geometric mean antagonist dose (with 95% confidence intervals between parentheses) of a test compound to inhibit the methoxamine response by 50%.

Dopamine antagonist properties. Twenty-four hours before use in the experiments, the rats were transferred to individual cages (described above) with water, but not food, freely available. The methods used were essentially the same as those described previously (Koek and Colpaert, 1993). During the experiments, the animals were observed during a 10-min period starting 30 min after the i.p. injection of 40 mg/kg methylphenidate or vehicle. During the 10-min period, an animal was observed once every min for 10 sec and the presence or absence of locomotion (with all four legs moving), rearing (standing on hindlegs, body fully extended), sniffing, gnawing (the cage or body) and licking (the cage) was recorded. To be considered present, a particular behavior had to occur uninterrupted for >= 3 sec. Because an animal was observed 10 times during the 10-min period, the incidence of each particular behavior could vary from 0 to 10. In addition, the presence of FBP was noted if it occurred during the entire 10-min observation period. Tremor and convulsions were noted if they occurred at any time during the observation period. At the end of the 10-min period, the animals were tested for catalepsy (the animals maintained for >= 30 sec, either (1) an abnormal cross-limbed position, imposed by the observer, in which the hindpaws were extended forward and placed on the forepaws, which were extended backward, or (2) both forepaws on a cylindrical metal bar 1.25 cm in diameter, 10 cm elevation), akinesia (absence of movement after handling), and loss of righting (the animal remained in position for >= 10 sec when placed on its back).

Based on the incidence of each particular behavior observed in control animals treated with saline or with 40 mg/kg methylphenidate, dose-response functions were determined from the percentage of rats showing normalization or inhibition of gnawing (see Results). ED50 values and their associated confidence limits and potency ratios were calculated by means of the Litchfield and Wilcoxon procedure.

Histamine antagonist properties. The in vivo assay of histamine H1 antagonist activity was based on that described previously (Rocha E Silva and Antonio, 1978). Briefly, 24 hr before use in the experiments, guinea pigs, weighing 310 to 490 g, were transferred to the room where the experiments were conducted, and were maintained under the same conditions as during quarantine. During the experiment, the animal was placed in a glass cylinder (26 cm wide and 15 cm high) into which the histamine aerosol was introduced by a nebulizer (Jouan, Paris, France) that by means of compressed air (pressure: 1 bar) produced dry particles (diameter: 1 to 3 µm) at a flow rate of 28 ml/hr. The concentration of histamine in the nebulizer was 1% (w/v) in 0.9% NaCl. The histamine aerosol induced bronchoconstriction, loss of righting, and, on continued exposure, convulsions. The animal was removed from the cylinder after it showed loss of righting and before the occurrence of convulsions, or when 3 min had elapsed, whichever occurred first. The dependent variable was the preconvulsion time, that is, the latency (in sec) from the start of exposure to the aerosol until the occurrence of loss of righting.

Based on data obtained in vehicle controls (see Results), three levels of protection from the effects of histamine were defined, that is, preconvulsion time >55, >70 or >180 sec. The first criterion was based on the finding that 95% of all the histamine-treated controls had preconvulsion times smaller than 55 sec. Thus, the occurrence of a latency >55 sec in an individual animal was considered to be statistically significant. The second criterion was equivalent to a prolongation of the average control preconvulsion time by 50% [i.e., 47 sec (control mean) + 23 sec (50% of the control mean) = 70 sec]. The third criterion represented a protection from the effects of histamine during the entire 3-min exposure period. Using these criteria, the percentage of animals protected at each dose was determined, and ED50 values, defined as the dose producing a given effect in 50% of the animals, were obtained by means of the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon.

All compounds were administered p.o., 60 min before the exposure to the histamine aerosol, with the exception of astemizole, which was administered 24 hr before the start of the experiment, because its activity has been reported to be maximal under these conditions (Van Wauve et al., 1981).

Pigeon conflict procedure. Male pigeons had free access to food pellets until their body weight was stable during 5 consecutive days, at which time their free-feeding weight was calculated. Thereafter, they were fed 5 g of pellets per day, until the body weight was reduced to 80% of its free-feeding value. From then on, the animals were maintained at approximately 80% of their free-feeding weight by giving, on weekdays, a quantity of pellets equal to the difference between the 80% value and the actual body weight, in g. During weekends, generally between 10 and 20 g of food per day was given.

In operant conditioning chambers (model E10-10, Coulbourn Instruments) equipped with a response key (model E21-17, Coulbourn Instruments) and a feeder (model E14-10, Coulbourn Instruments), pigeons were trained to peck the response key (transilluminated green or red) for access to mixed grain (Repas Tourterelle, Friskies, France) during daily, 15-min sessions, using a procedure detailed elsewhere (Kleven and Koek, 1996). When an animal showed equal and stable response rates under a multiple FR30:FR30 schedule in which the two key light colors alternated every 3 min, separated by a 1-min time-out during which the key light was extinguished, a brief electric shock was added to one of the components such that every 30th response produced both food (4 sec access) and shock [a constant current 50Hz AC square wave of 200 msec duration, delivered by a two-pole shocker (model E13-04, Coulbourn Instruments) through stainless steel electrodes implanted around each pubic bone]. Shock intensities, ranging from 2.5 to 5 mA, were adjusted for each pigeon to suppress responding to 10% or less of the preshock rates. Sessions ended after the fifth cycle of alternating components.

After the rates of both punished and unpunished responding reached stability under the multiple schedule, injections were administered into the pectoral muscle 5 min before the start of every session. Sessions were conducted between 9.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Tests took place on Wednesdays and Fridays, and saline (1 ml/kg) was administered on other days. Testing occurred only if the response rates on the preceding day were within ±2 S.D. of control values that were calculated from the data obtained during the five saline sessions immediately preceding the last five test sessions, or, for pigeons that were tested fewer than five times, from five saline sessions before drug administration.

Each session generated data on the total number of key peck responses made during the unpunished components and during the punished components of the schedule. Response rates during test sessions were evaluated for significance by (1) determining whether responding was within ±2 S.D. of the control values, and (2) using a randomization test for repeated measures (Siegel and Castellan, 1988) to compare responding with the preceding control day performance. For the latter analysis, either a one-tailed (punished responding) or a two-tailed (unpunished responding) P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Dose-response functions were determined from the percentage of pigeons in which response rates were outside their own control limits, for each dose, and ED50 values and their associated confidence limits were calculated with the Litchfield and Wilcoxon procedure.

Forced swimming test. The procedure has been described in detail by Porsolt et al. (1978), and involves placing a rat in a cylinder (height: 40 cm, diameter: 20 cm) containing 13 cm water (25°C) for 15 min on the first day of the experiment, and placing the animal again in the cylinder 24 hr later for 5 min. The duration of immobility during the 5-min period was measured by an observer who was unaware of the treatment conditions.

All compounds were administered once, 60 min before testing. In addition, imipramine and paroxetine were also administered repeatedly (at 24, 4 and 1 hr before testing). Compounds were administered p.o., and each dose was tested in 10 animals.

Drug effects on the median immobility time were analyzed statistically by comparing treated groups with control using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Drugs. The compounds used were [3H]8-OH-DPAT (160-240 Ci/mmol), [3H]mesulergine (70-85 Ci/mmol) and [3H]prazosin (65-85 Ci/mmol) (Amersham, France); [3H]ketanserin (60-90 Ci/mmol), [3H]-5-CT (15-30 Ci/mmol), [3H]pyrilamine (20-30 Ci/mmol) and [3H]YM-09151-2 (70-87 Ci/mmol) (New England Nuclear, France); IBMX, 5-HT creatinine sulfate, 5-HIAA, astemizole, buspirone hydrochloride, haloperidol, ketotifen fumarate, methoxamine hydrochloride, phentolamine mesylate, prazosin hydrochloride, promethazine hydrochloride, pyrilamine maleate, terfenadine, tripolidine hydrochloride and tryptamine (Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO); 5-methyl-urapidil, (±)-8-OH-DPAT hydrobromide, BMY 7378 dihydrochloride, (+)-butaclamol hydrochloride, m-CPP dihydrochloride, DOI, forskolin, imipramine hydrochloride, methysergide maleate, mianserin hydrochloride, NAN-190 hydrobromide, pargyline, quipazine dimaleate, SKF 38393 hydrochloride, TFMPP and urapidil hydrochloride (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA); ethanol (99.85%; Prolabo Sud-Ouest, Gradignan, France); chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride and diazepam (Interchim, Montluçon, France); levocabastine hydrochloride and noberastine dimaleate (Janssen Research, Beerse, Belgium); cetirizine dihydrochloride (UCB Pharma, Braine L'Alleud, Belgium); abecarnil (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany); citalopram (Lundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark); gepirone hydrochloride (Bristol Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT); ipsapirone hydrochloride (Troponwerke, Cologne, Germany); LY-228729 (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN); methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ciba-Geigy Co., Basel, Switzerland); tandospirone citrate (metanopirone; Sumitomo, Osaka, Japan); flesinoxan hydrochloride, lesopitron dihydrochloride, paroxetine hydrochloride, S 14506, WAY-100635 dihydrochloride and WY-50324 hydrochloride (adatanserin) (synthesized by J.-L. Maurel, Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre).

For receptor binding studies, F 11440 and buspirone were dissolved in ethanol (10-20%), and flesinoxan was dissolved in distilled water. In the cAMP experiments, compounds were dissolved in DMSO, except 5-HT, 8-OH-DPAT, flesinoxan and tryptamine, which were dissolved in water.

For in vivo studies, diazepam, F 11440, LY-228729, NAN-190, paroxetine, S 14506, tandospirone and WY 50,324 were suspended in distilled water by adding Tween 80 (2 drops/10 ml). All other drugs were dissolved in distilled water. An injection volume of 1 ml/100g was used throughout, except for intramuscular and intravenous injections, which were administered using a volume of 1 ml/kg. When injected i.v., F 11440 and flesinoxan were dissolved in a mixture of 60% PEG and 40% physiological saline. Doses are expressed as the weight of the free base.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Radioligand Binding

F 11440 had nanomolar affinity for 5-HT1A binding sites (Ki: 4.8 nM, pKi, 8.33); its affinity for these sites was ~7-fold higher than that of buspirone (pKi, 7.50), and ~4-fold lower than that of flesinoxan (pKi, 8.91). F 11440 was more selective for 5-HT1A sites than either buspirone or flesinoxan (fig. 2). Whereas the affinity of F 11440 for 5-HT1A sites was >= 100-fold higher than its affinity for the other serotonin receptor subtypes examined here [i.e., h 5-HT1B, h 5-HT1D, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C: pKi < 5.0), for dopamine D2 receptors (pKi, 5.75), for alpha-1 noradrenergic receptors (pKi, 6.16), and for histamine H1 receptors (pKi < 5.0)], this was not the case for buspirone or for flesinoxan. Buspirone had relatively high affinity for dopamine D2 sites (pKi, 7.43), and its affinity for alpha-1 adrenergic and H1 histamine receptors (pKi, 6.04 and 6.41, respectively) was <100-fold lower than its 5-HT1A affinity. Compared with buspirone, flesinoxan was more 5-HT1A selective with respect to alpha-1 adrenergic and histamine H1 receptors (pKi, 6.50 and 6.75, respectively). Compared with F 11440, however, flesinoxan was less selective with respect to h 5-HT1D, h 5-HT1B, D2 (pKi, 7.86, 7.19 and 7.05, respectively) and H1 receptors.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Affinity of F 11440, flesinoxan and buspirone for 5-HT1A and other binding sites (i.e., alpha-1-adrenergic, H1 histaminergic, h 5-HT1D and h 5-HT1B serotonergic, D2 dopaminergic). The solid bar indicates the affinity, expressed as pKi value, for 5-HT1A binding sites; the concentration that is 100-fold higher than this pKi value is indicated for each compound by a vertical dashed line.

cAMP in HA7 Cells

In cells transfected with human 5-HT1A receptors, F 11440 inhibited forskolin-induced stimulation of cAMP with a pEC50 value of 6.80 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) (fig. 3, top). The pEC50 values obtained with other compounds that exerted 5-HT1A agonist activity [i.e, 5-HT (7.48 ± 0.19), 8-OH-DPAT (7.59 ± 0.22), buspirone (6.70 ± 0.17), ipsapirone (7.34 ± 0.24), flesinoxan (7.69 ± 0.18), methysergide (5.61 ± 0.06) and tryptamine (5.36 ± 0.01) (not shown)] correlated positively (r = .96, P < .001) with values reported elsewhere (Pauwels et al., 1993).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in HA7 cells stably expressing human 5-HT1A receptors by F 11440 (top; first series of experiments), by F 11440, the 5-HT1A receptor agonists, ipsapirone, buspirone, 8-OH-DPAT and flesinoxan, and by 5-HT, each tested at a concentration of 10-5 M (middle; second series of experiments), and by F 11440 (10-4 M) and flesinoxan (10-4 M) in comparison with the effects obtained with 5-HT (10-5 M) (bottom; third series of experiments). Values are means ± SEM of four independent determinations (top) or of nine independent determinations (middle and bottom), each performed in triplicate. Within the middle and bottom, means represented by bars with a different fill pattern differ significantly (P < .05); means represented by bars with the same fill pattern are not significantly different.

The maximal inhibition of forskolin-induced stimulation of cAMP produced by a compound in HA7 cells offers one measure of its intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors. The partial 5-HT1A agonists buspirone and ipsapirone inhibited forskolin-induced stimulation, but only to ~60% of control, whereas the full agonist 5-HT inhibited the effects of forskolin more extensively, to ~10% of control (fig. 3, middle). At a concentration of 10-5 M, F 11440 inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP to a significantly greater extent than buspirone and ipsapirone. At a concentration of 10-4 M, F 11440 inhibited cAMP levels to 9.4 ± 1.4% (mean ± S.E.M.) of control, a value that was significantly lower than that obtained with 10-4 M flesinoxan (i.e., 17 ± 2.2%) and not significantly different from the value obtained with 5-HT (i.e., 10.7 ± 1.8%) (fig. 3, bottom).

Expressing the mean (n = 3-9) maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production observed with each compound tested in the pigeon conflict procedure (see below) as a proportion of the maximal effect produced by 5-HT, the following values were obtained: F 11440: 1.0, S 14506: 0.95, flesinoxan: 0.93, LY-228729: 0.88, tandospirone: 0.87, 8-OH-DPAT: 0.81, WY 50,324: 0.79, gepirone: 0.77, lesopitron: 0.70, buspirone: 0.49, ipsapirone: 0.46, BMY 7378: 0.0 and NAN 190: 0.0. The intrinsic activities of flesinoxan, 8-OH-DPAT, gepirone, buspirone, and ipsapirone, correlated positively (r = .76, rs = .90) with those reported previously in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human 5-HT1A receptor (McCall et al., 1994).

In Vivo Microdialysis

The mean basal extracellular level of 5-HT in ventral hippocampus was 34 ± 1.2 fmol/20 µl (n = 55). F 11440, administered i.p., dose-dependently decreased the extracellular level of 5-HT (fig. 4). Its ED50 value, calculated from the percent AUC data, was 0.049 mg/kg. F 11440 was ~30-fold more potent than buspirone, and ~4-fold more potent than flesinoxan (ED50 values: 1.6 and 0.23 mg/kg, buspirone and flesinoxan, respectively; its maximal effect (AUC = 34%) was similar to that of buspirone (37%) and flesinoxan (37%) (data not shown). The effects of 0.16 mg/kg F 11440 were blocked completely by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635 [ED50: 0.021 mg/kg; fig. (4].


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of F 11440 alone (top), and together with WAY-100635 (bottom), on extracellular 5-HT levels in microdialysates from the ventral hippocampus of chloralhydrate-anesthetized rats. The mean basal extracellular level of 5-HT was 34 ± 1.2 fmol/20 µl. Data shown are mean ± SEM for 5 animals per group. Top left, 5-HT levels are expressed as a percentage of the mean absolute amount of 5-HT in the four samples collected before the injection of saline (s.c.) at t-40 min; (open circle ) vehicle, (black-square) 0.01 mg/kg, () 0.04 mg/kg, (black-diamond ) 0.16 mg/kg, or (down-triangle) 0.63 mg/kg F 11440 were administered i.p, at t = 0 min. Top right, dose response curve for the inhibitory effect of F 11440 expressed as the mean percent AUC (area under the curve) for the 140 min post-injection period. Significant differences from dose 0 are indicated as ** P < .01 (one way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test). Bottom, (open circle  or dotted line) vehicle, (bullet  or dashed line) 0.16 mg/kg F 11440, () WAY-100635, (black-square) WAY-100635 + 0.16 mg/kg F 11440. Saline or WAY-100635 were administered s.c, at t-40 min, and vehicle or F 11440 were administered i.p, 40 min later, at t = 0 min.

Stimulation of Corticosterone Secretion

In vehicle control rats (n = 175, i.p.; n = 150, p.o.), the mean plasma corticosterone level was 73 ± 10 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/ml after i.p. administration and 45 ± 9.1 ng/ml after p.o. administration. Levels >410 ng/ml occurred in <5% of the i.p. controls, and levels >250 ng/ml occurred in <5% of the p.o. controls. Drugs were therefore considered to produce an effect in an individual animal if the observed corticosterone level was >410 ng/ml when administered i.p., or >250 ng/ml when administered p.o.

F 11440 dose-dependently increased corticosterone levels (fig. 5), and the ED50 value to produce these effects when administered p.o. (i.e., 0.16 mg/kg) was ~3-fold higher than the ED50 obtained after i.p. injection (i.e., 0.057 mg/kg). When administered i.p., F 11440 was ~60-fold more potent than buspirone (ED50: 3.4 mg/kg) and ~20-fold more potent than flesinoxan (ED50: 1.2 mg/kg); its maximal effect (680 ± 41 ng/ml) was similar to that of buspirone (610 ± 59 ng/ml) and flesinoxan (540 ± 38 ng/ml) (data not shown). The effects of 0.16 mg/kg F 11440 (i.p.) on corticosterone levels were blocked completely by WAY-100635 (ED50: 0.0027 mg/kg; fig. (5); this dose of F 11440 also produced LLR (see below), which was similarly blocked by WAY-100635 (ED50: 0.0025 mg/kg; data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Ability of F 11440 to increase plasma corticosterone levels in rats after i.p. (bullet ) and after p.o. administration (black-square), and its antagonism by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635. The results are expressed as the percentage of rats in which corticosterone levels were higher than a criterion value (see text) that was met in <5% of vehicle control animals. F 11440 dose-dependently increased the percentage of animals with significantly elevated corticosterone levels, both after i.p. (t-30 min) and after p.o. (t-60 min) administration (ED50 values: 0.057 and 0.16 mg/kg, respectively; left panel). WAY-100635 (administered s.c, t-60 min) dose-dependently antagonized (ED50: 0.0027 mg/kg) the increase of corticosterone levels produced by the i.p. administration of 0.16 mg/kg F 11440 (right).

LLR and Elements of the 5-HT Syndrome

An LLR or FPT score of 1 or more or the presence of FBP [scored as (1)] each occurred in <5% of the vehicle control animals (n = 225, i.p.) during the observation period centered at 15 min after the administration of vehicle. Drugs were therefore considered to produce an effect in an individual animal when scores higher than zero were obtained.

After i.p. administration in rats, F 11440 produced LLR and, at higher doses, FPT and FBP (table 2). This profile was similar to that of 5-HT1A agonists, such as 8-OH-DPAT, but differed from that of partial 5-HT1A agonists (e.g., buspirone) and putative 5-HT1A antagonists (e.g., NAN-190), which did not produce FPT, and from that of 5-HT agonists lacking substantial 5-HT1A affinity (i.e., DOI, mCPP, TFMPP and quipazine), which did not produce LLR (data not shown). F 11440 was ~5 times more potent than flesinoxan, and ~18 times more potent than buspirone, in producing LLR.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Induction of lower lip retraction and elements of the behavioral 5-HT syndrome by F 11440 and other 5-HT1A ligands

At various intervals after its administration, F 11440 produced LLR with a p.o. potency that was similar to its i.v. potency (data not shown). A comparison of the ED50 values after p.o. and i.v. administration at 60 min (i.e., 0.26 and 0.30 mg/kg, respectively) and at 120 min (i.e., 0.79 and 1.4 mg/kg, respectively) indicated that these values did not differ by more than a factor of 1.8.

DS Effects of 8-OH-DPAT

The discrimination of 8-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg) from saline was acquired within 100 sessions by 23 of the 27 rats (median sessions to criterion: 32; range: 17-88). Administration of the training drug under test conditions produced dose-related increases in drug-appropriate responding (ED50: 0.065 mg/kg, table 3) that reached a 100% level of effect at the training dose. A significant decrease of the overall rate of responding (79% of control) was produced only by the training dose.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Effects of F 11440, in comparison with those of 5-HT1A agonists, the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide, and those of ethanol, in different groups of rats trained to discriminate 8-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg), chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) or ethanol (1250 mg/kg) from saline

F 11440 produced dose-dependent responding on the 8-OH-DPAT lever (ED50: 0.021 m/kg) that reached a 100% level of effect at a dose of 0.08 mg/kg. Only a higher dose (i.e., 0.16 mg/kg) decreased significantly the overall rate of responding (55% of control). F 11440 was ~30-fold more potent than flesinoxan and buspirone to produce 8-OH-DPAT lever selection. In contrast to F 11440, flesinoxan and buspirone, which produced 8-OH-DPAT lever selection in >= 89% of the animals, chlordiazepoxide and ethanol produced DL selection in no more than 67% and 50% of the animals, respectively, at doses that decreased the overall rate of responding.

Duration of Action

F 11440 produced LLR at each of the pretreatment intervals (fig. 6). The lowest ED50 value (0.085 mg/kg) was observed at the first observation time, whereupon it increased to 19 mg/kg at 8 hrs after administration. Based on the time during which the ED50 was <4 times the lowest ED50, the duration of action of F 11440 was estimated to be 1.3 hr, similar to that of flesinoxan and buspirone, and shorter than the other 5-HT1A agonists shown.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Potency of F 11440 and prototypical 5-HT1A agonists in producing LLR at various times after oral administration. Values shown are ED50 values (mg/kg) calculated for each observation time point. Closed symbols represent ED50 values that are larger than the highest dose tested (40 mg/kg). Shown in parentheses are the estimated durations of action based on the time during which the ED50 was <4 times the lowest ED50 value.

In Vivo Selectivity

Alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist activity. Inhibition of the increase in blood pressure induced in anesthetized rats by the i.v. administration of the alpha-1-adrenoceptor agonist, methoxamine, was used as an in vivo measure of peripheral alpha-1 antagonist properties. Methoxamine (0.16 mg/kg, i.v.) increased mean arterial pressure from a base-line value of 115 ± 5 mm Hg to a peak value of 175 ± 3 mm Hg (n = 18). Prazosin, 5-methyl-urapidil and urapidil dose-dependently antagonized the increase in mean arterial pressure induced by methoxamine, with ID50 values of 0.16, 0.36 and 1.0 mg/kg i.p., respectively. According to the measure used here, F 11440 exerted alpha-1 antagonist activity in vivo, but only at doses that were ~70-fold higher than those that produced 5-HT1A agonist effects (e.g., increases in corticosterone levels; fig. 7). In contrast, flesinoxan, although it had high selectivity for 5-HT1A receptors in vitro, exerted alpha-1 antagonist activity in vivo at doses <3-fold higher than those needed to produce 5-HT1A agonist effects.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Ability of F 11440 (top) and flesinoxan (bottom) to exert 5-HT1A agonist activity (increase of corticosterone levels; bullet ) and alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist activity (inhibition of the pressor response induced by methoxamine; open circle ) after i.p. administration in rats. The figure inserts show in vitro (ratio of pKi values) and in vivo (ratio of ED50 values) measures of the selectivity for 5-HT1A as compared with alpha-1-adrenergic receptors. Corticosterone data obtained with F 11440 are replotted from fig. 5.

Dopamine antagonist activity. A total of 140 animals received a vehicle control treatment via either the s.c. or i.p. route, 30 min before the injection of methylphenidate (40 mg/kg i.p.). Gnawing was prominent after methylphenidate administration (9.7 ± 0.02; mean ± S.E.M.); sniffing, rearing and locomotion, although increased at doses from 0.63 to 10 mg/kg (Koek and Colpaert, 1993), did not occur after administration of the 40 mg/kg dose. Gnawing scores of 9 or 10 were observed in >95% of the animals treated with the 40 mg/kg dose of methylphenidate. Thus, a pretreatment was considered to have decreased the incidence of gnawing in an individual animal when a score <9 was observed. In control animals not receiving methylphenidate (n = 104), gnawing, locomotion, rearing, sniffing and licking each appeared with an average incidence of <1, and the scores obtained in <5% of the animals were as follows: gnawing (1), locomotion (5), sniffing (9), rearing (7), and licking (1). Test compounds were therefore considered to have normalized methylphenidate-induced behaviors in individual animals if the following composite criterion was met: gnawing < 2, locomotion < 6, sniffing < 10, rearing < 8, and licking < 2.

F 11440 dose-dependently inhibited methylphenidate-induced gnawing (data not shown) (ED50: 0.12 mg/kg; maximal effect: 1.0 ± 1.0). Pretreatment with WAY-100635 (0.63 mg/kg, s.c.) attenuated the effects of F 11440 on methylphenidate-induced gnawing (ED50: 55 mg/kg; maximal effect: 0.40 ± 0.25). F 11440 was unable to normalize the behavior of methylphenidate-treated rats, either in the absence or in the presence of WAY-100635 (maximum percentage of rats normalized: 0% and 40%, respectively).

Histamine antagonist activity. The average preconvulsion time in guinea pigs exposed to a histamine aerosol after being pretreated with vehicle control (n = 66) was 47 ± 0.5 sec, and 95% of these controls showed preconvulsion times shorter than 55 sec. Thus, a pretreatment was considered to protect an individual animal if the preconvulsion time was longer than 55 sec. In addition, two other levels of protection from the effects of histamine were defined: (1) preconvulsion time longer than 70 sec (i.e., prolongation of the mean control preconvulsion time by >50%), and (2) preconvulsion time longer than 180 sec (i.e., protection from the effects of histamine during the entire 3 min exposure period).

Using the 180 sec protection criterion, the following potency order was found for the histamine H1 antagonists tested: levocabastine (0.028 mg/kg, p.o.) > noberastine (0.068) > ketotifen (0.20) > astemizole (0.27) > cetirizine (1.2) > terfenadine (3.1) > tripolidine (12) > pyrilamine (28) > promethazine (75). The alpha-1-adrenergic antagonist, prazosin, tested at doses up to 160 mg/kg, was unable to protect from the effects of histamine.

F 11440, which lacked affinity for H1 receptors, did not protect against the preconvulsant effects of a histamine aerosol in guinea pigs (fig. 8) when tested p.o. at 40 mg/kg, a dose 250-fold higher than the p.o. dose at which F 11440 exerted in vivo 5-HT1A agonist activity (i.e., 0.16 mg/kg). In contrast, flesinoxan had moderate affinity for histamine H1 receptors, and had antihistaminergic activity in vivo at doses that were 18-150 fold higher (depending on the protection criterion used) than the doses that had in vivo 5-HT1A agonist properties.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Ability of F 11440 (top) and flesinoxan (bottom) to exert 5-HT1A agonist activity (increase of corticosterone levels in rats; bullet ) and histamine H1 antagonist activity (protection from histamine-induced preconvulsions in guinea pigs; other symbols, one for each duration of protection) after p.o. administration. The figure inserts show in vitro (ratio of pKi values) and in vivo (ratio of ED50 values) measures of the selectivity for 5-HT1A as compared with histamine H1 receptors. Corticosterone data obtained with F 11440 are replotted from figure 5.

DS effects of chlordiazepoxide and ethanol. The discrimination between chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) and saline was acquired within 100 sessions by all 29 rats trained (median sessions to criterion: 26; range: 14-60). Chlordiazepoxide produced dose-dependent responding on the DL [ED50: 1.3 mg/kg; table (3)] that reached a 100% level of effect. At doses ~7-fold higher than those that produced 8-OH-DPAT-like DS effects, F 11440 produced DL selection (ED50: 0.14 mg/kg), but with a maximal effect of 60% at a dose (0.16 mg/kg) at which lever selection occurred in only five of the seven animals tested and that was higher than the lowest dose (0.08 mg/kg) that significantly decreased the overall rate of responding. Ethanol and 8-OH-DPAT produced DL selection in a maximum of only 14 and 25% of the animals, respectively. Buspirone and flesinoxan did not produce DL selection.

The discrimination between ethanol (1250 mg/kg) and saline was acquired within 100 sessions by 26 of the 27 rats trained (median sessions to criterion: 33.5; range: 9-80). Like ethanol, chlordiazepoxide produced dose-dependent responding on the ethanol lever that reached >90%. At a dose ~8-fold higher than that which produced 8-OH-DPAT-like DS effects, F 11440 produced a maximum of 50% DL selection and decreased the rate of responding. Of the other 5-HT1A agonists tested, only flesinoxan produced >50% DL selection, at a dose that also had response rate-decreasing effects.

Pigeon Conflict Procedure

For the 58 pigeons used in this study, the median shock intensity was 4.5 mA (range: 2-5 mA) and body weights were maintained at an average of 79 ± 1% of control (mean ± S.E.M.). Mean rates of responding under the different components of the multiple schedule before testing began were 2.19 ± 0.06 and 0.07 ± 0.01 responses/sec, unpunished and punished responding, respectively. Thus, under control conditions, response rates during the punished components were suppressed by >90% relative to shock-free response rates. Among the groups tested in the present experiment, mean control rates of punished responding ranged from 0.003 ± 0.001 to 0.07 ± 0.022 responses/sec and the number of control punished responses emitted in individual pigeons ranged from 0 to 247.

The prototypical 5-HT1A agonists as well as the benzodiazepines, chlordiazepoxide and abecarnil, produced dose-related percentage increases in punished responding (fig. 9), and did so, in general, along inverted U-shaped dose-response functions, with the descending limb corresponding to the onset of effects on unpunished responding. F 11440 produced significant and substantial increases of punished responding over a wide range of doses that did not significantly affect the rate of unpunished responding. In comparison with other 5-HT1A agonists (fig. 9, table 4), F 11440 was (1) among the most potent compounds to increase punished responding, (2) produced its effects on punished responding over a range of doses that was wider than that of all other compounds tested, except 8-OH-DPAT, (3) had maximal effects on punished responding similar to those of 8-OH-DPAT, but higher than all other compounds, (4) increased punished responding in a percentage of pigeons higher than any of the other 5-HT1A agonists, except 8-OH-DPAT, and (5) exerted its effects on punished responding at doses lower than those affecting unpunished responding. In particular, the antipunishment effects of F 11440 were more substantial than those of buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan, which significantly increased punished responding at best at only one dose, with maximal effects lower than those of F 11440 and at doses similar to those that decreased unpunished responding.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effects of F 11440, 5-HT1A agonists, and the benzodiazepines, chlordiazepoxide and abecarnil, on punished and unpunished responding in the pigeon. For all drugs, n = 7 per dose. Values represent the mean ± SEM percentage change from control sessions conducted immediately before the test session. Where absent, error bars are contained within the symbol. Closed symbols: punished responding; Open symbols: unpunished responding. *Values significantly (P < .05) higher than (punished responding) or different from (unpunished responding) performance under control conditions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4
Ability of F 11440, prototypical 5-HT1A agonists and the benzodiazepines chlordiazepoxide and abecarnil to increase punished responding and to decrease unpunished responding in a conflict procedure in pigeons

The potencies with which the 5-HT1A agonists increased punished responding in pigeons were correlated positively (r = .7, P < .05; fig. 10) with their ability to produce lower lip retraction in rats. The magnitude of the effects on punished responding observed here with the 5-HT1A agonists, 8-OH-DPAT, S 14506, flesinoxan, buspirone BMY 7378, and NAN-190, correlated positively (r = .81, P < .05; data not shown) with the magnitude of their antipunishment effects in pigeons reported previously (Colpaert et al., 1992). Further, the maximal effects on punished responding of all 5-HT1A agonists examined here correlated positively (r = .74, P < .005; rs = .78, P < .005; fig. 10) with their intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors, which was measured by expressing the mean maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production observed with each compound as a proportion of the maximal effect produced by 5-HT.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Ability of F 11440 and various other 5-HT1A agonists to increase punished responding in pigeons: relationships with other effects. Top, relationship between potency to produce LLR in rats and potency to increase punished responding. Bottom, relationship between intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors (maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in HA7 cells, expressed as a proportion of the maximal effect of 5-HT) and anxiolytic-like activity (maximum effect on punished responding). "r" represents Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient.

Forced Swimming Test

The results obtained with F 11440, flesinoxan, ipsapirone, buspirone, imipramine and paroxetine are summarized in figure 11 and are expressed as percentage inhibition of the median immobility time observed in control animals (control medians ranged from 140 to 162 sec).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Ability of F 11440 to produce antidepressant-like effects (inhibition of immobility in the forced swimming or "behavioral despair" test in rats) in comparison with effects of other 5-HT1A agonists (top), and the antidepressants, imipramine (middle) and paroxetine (bottom). F 11440 and the other 5-HT1A agonists were administered once, 60 min before testing, whereas imipramine and paroxetine were administered once, at 60 min, or three times, at 24 hr, 4 hr and 60 min before testing. All compounds were administered p.o. *Significantly (alpha = .05) different from vehicle control values.

F 11440, administered once, p.o., 60 min before the test session, potently inhibited immobility over a range of doses, and the apparent maximal effect was higher than that of flesinoxan, ipsapirone, and buspirone. F 11440 significantly inhibited immobility at all five doses tested. In contrast, flesinoxan and ipsapirone significantly inhibited immobility at no more than two doses. Buspirone did not decrease immobility, but actually increased it.

Both the classical tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, and the more recently described selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressant, paroxetine, were able to inhibit immobility. Their ability to inhibit immobility was statistically significant, yet moderate, after a single administration, but was more pronounced after three administrations, at 24, 4 and 1 hr before the test session. When administered repeatedly, imipramine inhibited immobility at doses ranging from 5 to 80 mg/kg. The ability of higher doses to inhibit immobility could not be examined, because the repeated administration of 320 mg/kg imipramine had lethal effects. Paroxetine, when administered repeatedly, dose-dependently and significantly inhibited immobility, and attained its maximum effect at a dose of 80 mg/kg. Repeated administration of 320 mg/kg (i.e., 4-fold higher than the dose of paroxetine that produced the maximum effect after one administration) had lethal effects. Only paroxetine was able to produce antidepressant-like effects of a magnitude similar to that produced by a single administration of F 11440 but only when paroxetine was administered repeatedly.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

F 11440 is a potent, selective and efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist. Its affinity for 5-HT1A binding sites was higher than that of the partial agonist, buspirone, which is clinically available as an anxiolytic, and somewhat lower than that of the reportedly higher-efficacy 5-HT1A agonist, flesinoxan, which is in phase III of clinical development as an anxiolytic/antidepressant. In vivo, F 11440 was ~4 to 10 times more potent than flesinoxan, and nearly 100 times more potent than buspirone, in exerting 5-HT1A agonist activity after oral administration. F 11440 did not have detectable antidopaminergic or antihistaminergic activity (unlike buspirone and flesinoxan, respectively) and had a 70-fold separation between its 5-HT1A agonist and alpha-1 antagonist properties in vivo, unlike flesinoxan, which showed a <3-fold separation. F 11440 had intrinsic activity at human 5-HT1A receptors higher than that of buspirone, ipsapirone, and flesinoxan. Thus, F 11440 appears to be a more potent, a more selective and a more efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist than buspirone and flesinoxan.

F 11440 is the outcome of a research effort guided by the hypothesis that high intrinsic activity is necessary for 5-HT1A agonists to produce large anxiolytic and antidepressant effects (Colpaert et al., 1992; De Vry, 1996). This hypothesis was supported by the finding that intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors correlated positively with the magnitude of anxiolytic-like effects and the finding of a positive relation between intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors and the magnitude of antidepressant-like effects. Indeed, F 11440, which showed higher intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors than buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan, exerted, in the animal models used here more substantial anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects than buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan. Furthermore, the only compound able to produce antidepressant-like effects of a magnitude similar to that produced by a single administration of F 11440 was paroxetine, but p