![]() |
|
|
Vol. 287, Issue 1, 266-283, October 1998
Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Castres Cedex, France
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F 11440 (4-methyl-2-[4-(4-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-piperazino)-butyl]-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazin-3,5-dione) was the outcome of a research effort guided by the hypothesis that the magnitude of the intrinsic activity of agonists at 5-HT1A receptors determines the magnitude of their antidepressant and anxiolytic-like effects. The affinity of F 11440 for 5-HT1A binding sites (pKi, 8.33) was higher than that of buspirone (pKi, 7.50), and somewhat lower than that of flesinoxan (pKi, 8.91). In vivo, F 11440 was 4- to 20-fold more potent than flesinoxan, and 30- to 60-fold more potent than buspirone, in exerting 5-HT1A agonist activity at pre- and postsynaptic receptors in rats (measured by, for example, its ability to decrease hippocampal extracellular serotonin (5-HT) levels and to increase plasma corticosterone levels, respectively). F 11440 did not have detectable antidopaminergic activity (unlike buspirone, which inhibited all of the directly observable behavioral effects of methylphenidate in rats), showed no evidence of antihistaminergic activity (unlike flesinoxan, which protected against the effects of a histamine aerosol in guinea pigs), and had a 70-fold separation between its 5-HT1A agonist and alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist properties (measured as the ability to inhibit the methoxamineinduced increase in blood pressure in rats), unlike flesinoxan, which showed a <3-fold separation. In HeLa cells expressing human 5-HT1A receptors, F 11440 decreased the forskolin-induced increase in AMP, and, based on its maximal effect, was found to have an intrinsic activity of 1.0 relative to that of 5-HT, which was significantly higher than that of buspirone (0.49), ipsapirone (0.46) and flesinoxan (0.93). Consistent with the aforementioned hypothesis, F 11440 produced anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in animal models (i.e., increased punished responding in a pigeon conflict procedure and decreased immobility in a rat forced swimming test, respectively) that were more substantial than those of buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan. Thus, F 11440, shown here to be a potent, selective, high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist, appears to have the potential to exert marked anxiolytic and antidepressant activity in humans.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antidepressants
and benzodiazepine-type anxiolytics are among the most commonly
prescribed therapeutic agents. Although selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, induce fewer side effects than the
"classic" antidepressants that were introduced in the 1950s
(i.e., MAO inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants), their
clinical efficacy is similarly limited: that is, they have a slow onset
of action (i.e., 2-4 weeks) and they are effective in only
~70% of depressed patients, less than half of whom show a full
response (see reviews by, for example, Broekkamp et al., 1995
; Möller and Volz, 1996
; Frazer, 1997
). For the treatment of
anxiety, the benzodiazepines, introduced in the 1960s, have largely
replaced barbiturates and other nonbenzodiazepine sedatives, primarily
because of their safety; their clinical efficacy, however, is limited
(see Rickels et al., 1978
; Greenblatt et al.,
1983a
, 1983b
; Rosenbaum, 1982
). Thus, currently available treatments for depression and anxiety, although being safer and having fewer side
effects, do not appear to be markedly more efficacious than the
antidepressants and anxiolytics that were discovered in the 1950-60s.
That advances in terms of improved clinical efficacy have as yet to be
made is perhaps not surprising inasmuch as the mechanisms of
antidepressant and anxiolytic drug action have so far remained
essentially unchanged [i.e., indirect stimulation of
monoaminergic systems to exert antidepressant effects, and potentiation
of
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic systems to exert anxiolytic
effects]. Perhaps, agents acting by other mechanisms will prove more
efficacious than the currently available treatments.
One novel molecular target has become apparent with the introduction of
buspirone for the treatment of anxiety, and also, of depression (see
reviews by, for example, Tunnicliff et al., 1991
; Fulton and
Brogden, 1997
). Buspirone, and its analogues gepirone and ipsapirone,
activate directly a particular subtype of 5-HT receptor, the
5-HT1A receptor. Their clinical efficacy, however, is not an improvement over that of other available treatments (e.g., Deakin, 1993
). Several hypotheses have
guided the search for 5-HT1A agonists with
enhanced activity in animal models of anxiety and depression. One such
hypothesis is that the combination of 5-HT1A
agonist with 5-HT2 antagonist properties confers
a more advantageous therapeutic profile (Barrett and Vanover, 1993
;
Millan and Brocco, 1993
), and several compounds thought to possess such a combination have been described [e.g., WY
50,324 (Barrett and Vanover, 1993
), and S 14671 (Millan et
al., 1992
)]. Recent results (Kleven and Koek, 1996
), however,
failed to confirm empirically the alleged superiority of mixed
5-HT1A agonists/5-HT2
antagonists and showed, for example, that the anxiolytic-like effects
of 5-HT1A agonists in animals were not markedly
enhanced by the 5-HT2 antagonist, ritanserin.
Our research has been guided by the hypothesis that the magnitude of
the psychotropic activity of 5-HT1A receptor
ligands (i.e., their clinical efficacy) is a direct,
positive function of the magnitude of their intrinsic activity at the
receptor. This relationship has been established, in the laboratory,
for the anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT1A ligands
(Colpaert et al., 1992
), and evidence presented here
suggests that this relationship exists also for their
antidepressant-like effects (see also De Vry, 1995
, 1996
). This
relationship between clinical efficacy and intrinsic activity may
explain why buspirone and its analogues, gepirone and ipsapirone, have
limited clinical efficacy; these compounds activate the
5-HT1A receptor only weakly and are generally considered to be partial 5-HT1A agonists. In
contrast with buspirone, greater activation is achieved with flesinoxan
(e.g., Boddeke et al., 1992
). The
latter compound is in phase III trials; it will be of interest to learn
about its clinical efficacy, but flesinoxan's intrinsic activity may
still be limited and inferior to that of 5-HT itself (McCall et
al., 1994
; Hadrava et al., 1995
).
The purpose of our drug discovery effort has been to identify novel 5-HT1A ligands possessing an intrinsic activity higher than that of buspirone and flesinoxan. Here, we report results obtained with F 11440 (4-methyl-2-[4-(4-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-piperazino)-butyl]-2H,4H-1,2,4-triazin-3,5-dione; fig. 1), which is shown to be a potent, selective, high efficacy 5-HT1A receptor agonist with marked antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like activity in preclinical models and, thus, with the potential to exert antidepressant and anxiolytic activity in humans that may be more substantial than that of currently available treatments.
|
Most cases of depressive disorders occur in people with a history of
other disorders, most frequently anxiety (e.g.,
Kessler et al., 1996
). It has been hypothesized that
impaired serotonergic mechanisms underlie depression preceded by
anxiety, and that serotonergically acting anxiolytics, such as
5-HT1A agonists, will be the treatment of choice
in such "anxiety-driven" depression (Van Praag, 1996
). If well
tolerated in humans, F 11440 may be one of the most pertinent, currently available tools to test this hypothesis.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Ico: OFA SD [IOPS Caw], Iffa Credo, l'Arbresle, France), weighing 160 to 200 g on arrival, were group housed (five animals per cage) with food and water freely available in a quarantine room for 4 to 8 days before being used in the experiments. Thereafter, they were housed individually in hanging cages (length × width × height: 28 × 21 × 18 cm; Iffa Credo, France) with metal grid floors, in the room where the experiments were conducted, with unlimited access to filtered (0.22 µm) water and, except when stated otherwise, standard laboratory food (UAR A03; UAR, Epinay/s/Orge, France). For the forced swimming test, male Wistar rats (Rj: WISTAR (AF), Centre d'Elevage Roger Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were used. They were housed in groups of five in plastic cages (41 × 25 × 14 cm) containing wood shavings, with free access to food (UAR 113) and water until tested.
Male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs (Hartley Crl: (HA), Charles River, Elbeuf, France), weighing 310 to 490 g, were on arrival group housed (nine animals per cage) in plastic cages (55 × 37 × 39 cm) containing wood shavings, in a quarantine room, for 4 to 5 days before use in the experiments. The animals were transferred to the room where the experiments were conducted on the day before the experiment began and were maintained under the same conditions as during quarantine. Male White Carneau pigeons (Palmetto Pigeon Plant, Sumter, SC), weighing 500 to 650 g, were housed individually in metal cages (46 × 30 × 40 cm) with unlimited access to water, crushed oyster shell grit and, except when stated otherwise, food (Purina pigeon pellets 0310, Purina, France). All animals were housed in environmentally controlled rooms (21 ± 1°C, relative humidity: 55 ± 5%) under a 12-hr light dark-cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.), both during quarantine and during the experiments. The experimental procedures were in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of November 24, 1986 (86/609/EEC) and the National Institutes of Health "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NRC, 1996) and were approved by the institutional Protocol Review Committee.Radioligand binding. Binding affinities for the different receptors were determined by means of ligand displacement assays using the conditions summarized in table 1. The reactions were stopped by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/B glass-fiber filters, and the filters were washed with appropriate buffer. The radioactivity retained on the filters was measured by scintillation spectroscopy in 4 ml scintillation fluid (Emulsifier Safe, Packard). All experiments were performed in triplicate, except H1, h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D binding, which were performed in duplicate. IC50 values were determined using nonlinear regression, except the IC50 values for h 5-HT1B and h 5-HT1D receptors, which were obtained by interpolation. Ki values were calculated using the equation Ki = IC50 (1 + [C]/KD), and the results were expressed as mean pKi values ± S.E.M. of three independent determinations (two determinations if pKi < 5.0).
|
cAMP in HA7 cells.
The HeLa cell line permanently
transfected with the human 5-HT1A receptor gene
and permanently expressing the 5-HT1A receptor protein (HA7) as described by Fargin et al. (1989)
was
commercially obtained from Duke University (Durham, NC). HA7 cells were
grown in DMEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum,
gentamicin (100 µg/ml), geneticin (G418) (400 µg/ml) in 5%
CO2 at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere.
The cells were plated in six-well culture plates and used in the
experiments at a confluency of 80% to 90%. Culturing medium (DMEM,
10% fetal calf serum, gentamicin 100 µg/ml, G418 400 µl/ml) was
replaced by DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum without
antibiotics 24 hr before experimentation.
5 M
(i.e., a concentration at which the reference compounds used here appeared to attain their maximal effects) in a first series of
experiments and at 10
4 M in a second
series. Data from each series were analyzed statistically by means of a
one-way analysis of variance followed by sequential paired comparisons
by means of Newman-Keuls tests (Winer, 1971In vivo microdialysis.
The methods have been
described previously (Assié and Koek, 1996
). A probe (CMA/12, 2 mm length, 0.5 mm diameter, CMA, Microdialysis AB) was implanted into
the left hippocampus [stereotaxic coordinates: rostral -4.8 mm,
lateral +4.6 mm, ventral -7.5 mm, from bregma and dura surface
according to Paxinos and Watson (1986)
] of anesthetized rats (chloral
hydrate, 400-500 mg/kg i.p., and supplementary doses were used to
maintain anesthesia). The probe was continuously perfused (1.1 µl/min) with artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing 1 µM of the
selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor, citalopram. Starting approximately 2 hr after implantation, perfusates were collected every 20 min and
analyzed directly for 5-HT content using high performance liquid
chromatography with electrochemical detection (DECADE detector, ANTEC
Leyden, The Netherlands).
Stimulation of corticosterone secretion. Twenty-four hours before use in the experiments, rats were housed individually in a restricted area (accessible only to the experimenter) and received 15 g standard laboratory food (water continued to be available freely). Experiments, consisting of drug treatments after which animals were decapitated and trunk blood was collected, were conducted between 8:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. Drugs (or vehicle) were administered 60 min before decapitation when given p.o., and 30 min before decapitation when given i.p. Antagonists were administered s.c., 30 min before the i.p. administration of agonists. Immediately before decapitation, animals were observed for the presence or absence of LLR.
Trunk blood was collected into chilled tubes containing 2.5% ethylenediamine tetracetic acid (0.2 M). The blood samples were centrifuged (2100 × g, 15 min, 4°C), and the plasma was aliquoted and stored at 20°C. Corticosterone levels were determined by means of an assay for CBG (Murphy, 1967LLR and elements of the 5-HT syndrome.
Twenty-four hours
before use in the experiments, the animals were transferred to
individual cages (described above) with water, but not food, freely
available. The methods used were essentially the same as those
described previously (Kleven et al., 1995
). During the
experiments, which took place between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m., rats
were observed at two time points, centered at 15 and 60 min after the
injection, and each lasting 10 min. During a 10-min period, an animal
was observed once every min for 10 sec and the presence (1), or absence
(0) of LLR and FPT was recorded. To be considered present, a sign had
to occur uninterrupted for
3 sec. Because an animal was observed 10 times during a 10-min period, the incidence of a particular sign could
vary from 0 to 10. FBP was scored present (1) if it occurred during the
entire 10-min observation period; otherwise, the score was 0.
Drug discrimination. In addition to the food pellets obtained during the conditioning sessions, which were held between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday), rats received 10 g standard laboratory food per day, except during weekends when food was freely available from 5:00 p.m. on Friday until 2:00 p.m. on Sunday.
Using operant conditioning chambers (model E10-10, Coulbourn Instruments, Lehigh Valley, PA) equipped with two levers and a food pellet dispenser (model E14-12, Coulbourn Instruments), rats were trained to lever press for food (45-mg dustless pellets, Bioserv, Frenchtown, NJ) during daily, 15 min sessions. When an animal showed stable FR10 performance, drug discrimination training was started using a procedure detailed elsewhere (Koek et al., 1995Duration of action. The methods used were identical to those described above for the 5-HT syndrome, except that behavioral observations were conducted during six 10-min periods, centered at 10, 60, 120, 240 and 480 min after the injection. Dose-response functions were determined from the percentage of rats showing LLR scores of 1 or more. This criterion was based on the finding that an LLR score of 1 or more occurred in <5% of the control animals receiving saline orally (n = 130) during the observation period centered at 60 min after administration of saline. ED50 values and their associated confidence limits were calculated by means of the Litchfield and Wilcoxon procedure. Duration of action was estimated by calculating the ED50 value and 95% confidence limits at each time interval (10 min and 1, 2, 4 and 8 hr), and by plotting the log-ED50 values as a function of time. The duration of effect, defined as the time during which the ED50 was <4 times the minimum ED50 value, was estimated by linear interpolation of the empirical time-log-ED50 function.
Alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist properties. Experiments were carried out in rats (270-390 g) that had free access to water and standard laboratory food. On the day of the experiment, animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed on a heated table to maintain the rectal temperature at 37 ± 0.5°C. Animals underwent tracheotomy to allow spontaneous breathing. Catheters were inserted into the penile vein for infusing drugs and in the right carotid artery for continuous measurement of arterial pressure via a Statham P10EZ pressure transducer (Viggo-Spectromed, Oxnard, CA) connected to a Gould amplifier (Gould Instruments, France). The analog arterial pressure signal was digitized and simultaneously recorded by means of data acquisition software (AcqKnowledge, Biopac Systems Inc., Goleta, CA). Rats received an i.p. injection of either vehicle or a single dose of the test drug, and 30 min later, 0.16 mg/kg methoxamine or its vehicle was injected i.v.
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Dose-response curves of compounds to inhibit the methoxamine-induced increase in mean arterial pressure were fitted using an operational sigmoid model (Marquardt, 1963Dopamine antagonist properties.
Twenty-four hours before use
in the experiments, the rats were transferred to individual cages
(described above) with water, but not food, freely available. The
methods used were essentially the same as those described previously
(Koek and Colpaert, 1993
). During the experiments, the animals were
observed during a 10-min period starting 30 min after the i.p.
injection of 40 mg/kg methylphenidate or vehicle. During the 10-min
period, an animal was observed once every min for 10 sec and the
presence or absence of locomotion (with all four legs moving), rearing
(standing on hindlegs, body fully extended), sniffing, gnawing (the
cage or body) and licking (the cage) was recorded. To be considered
present, a particular behavior had to occur uninterrupted for
3 sec.
Because an animal was observed 10 times during the 10-min period, the
incidence of each particular behavior could vary from 0 to 10. In
addition, the presence of FBP was noted if it occurred during the
entire 10-min observation period. Tremor and convulsions were noted if they occurred at any time during the observation period. At the end of
the 10-min period, the animals were tested for catalepsy (the animals
maintained for
30 sec, either (1) an abnormal cross-limbed position,
imposed by the observer, in which the hindpaws were extended forward
and placed on the forepaws, which were extended backward, or (2) both
forepaws on a cylindrical metal bar 1.25 cm in diameter, 10 cm
elevation), akinesia (absence of movement after handling), and loss of
righting (the animal remained in position for
10 sec when placed on
its back).
Histamine antagonist properties.
The in vivo
assay of histamine H1 antagonist activity was
based on that described previously (Rocha E Silva and Antonio, 1978
). Briefly, 24 hr before use in the experiments, guinea pigs, weighing 310 to 490 g, were transferred to the room where the experiments were
conducted, and were maintained under the same conditions as during
quarantine. During the experiment, the animal was placed in a glass
cylinder (26 cm wide and 15 cm high) into which the histamine aerosol
was introduced by a nebulizer (Jouan, Paris, France) that by means of
compressed air (pressure: 1 bar) produced dry particles (diameter: 1 to
3 µm) at a flow rate of 28 ml/hr. The concentration of histamine in
the nebulizer was 1% (w/v) in 0.9% NaCl. The histamine aerosol
induced bronchoconstriction, loss of righting, and, on continued
exposure, convulsions. The animal was removed from the cylinder after
it showed loss of righting and before the occurrence of convulsions, or
when 3 min had elapsed, whichever occurred first. The dependent
variable was the preconvulsion time, that is, the latency (in sec) from
the start of exposure to the aerosol until the occurrence of loss of
righting.
Pigeon conflict procedure. Male pigeons had free access to food pellets until their body weight was stable during 5 consecutive days, at which time their free-feeding weight was calculated. Thereafter, they were fed 5 g of pellets per day, until the body weight was reduced to 80% of its free-feeding value. From then on, the animals were maintained at approximately 80% of their free-feeding weight by giving, on weekdays, a quantity of pellets equal to the difference between the 80% value and the actual body weight, in g. During weekends, generally between 10 and 20 g of food per day was given.
In operant conditioning chambers (model E10-10, Coulbourn Instruments) equipped with a response key (model E21-17, Coulbourn Instruments) and a feeder (model E14-10, Coulbourn Instruments), pigeons were trained to peck the response key (transilluminated green or red) for access to mixed grain (Repas Tourterelle, Friskies, France) during daily, 15-min sessions, using a procedure detailed elsewhere (Kleven and Koek, 1996Forced swimming test.
The procedure has been described in
detail by Porsolt et al. (1978)
, and involves placing a rat
in a cylinder (height: 40 cm, diameter: 20 cm) containing 13 cm water
(25°C) for 15 min on the first day of the experiment, and placing the
animal again in the cylinder 24 hr later for 5 min. The duration of
immobility during the 5-min period was measured by an observer who was
unaware of the treatment conditions.
Drugs. The compounds used were [3H]8-OH-DPAT (160-240 Ci/mmol), [3H]mesulergine (70-85 Ci/mmol) and [3H]prazosin (65-85 Ci/mmol) (Amersham, France); [3H]ketanserin (60-90 Ci/mmol), [3H]-5-CT (15-30 Ci/mmol), [3H]pyrilamine (20-30 Ci/mmol) and [3H]YM-09151-2 (70-87 Ci/mmol) (New England Nuclear, France); IBMX, 5-HT creatinine sulfate, 5-HIAA, astemizole, buspirone hydrochloride, haloperidol, ketotifen fumarate, methoxamine hydrochloride, phentolamine mesylate, prazosin hydrochloride, promethazine hydrochloride, pyrilamine maleate, terfenadine, tripolidine hydrochloride and tryptamine (Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO); 5-methyl-urapidil, (±)-8-OH-DPAT hydrobromide, BMY 7378 dihydrochloride, (+)-butaclamol hydrochloride, m-CPP dihydrochloride, DOI, forskolin, imipramine hydrochloride, methysergide maleate, mianserin hydrochloride, NAN-190 hydrobromide, pargyline, quipazine dimaleate, SKF 38393 hydrochloride, TFMPP and urapidil hydrochloride (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA); ethanol (99.85%; Prolabo Sud-Ouest, Gradignan, France); chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride and diazepam (Interchim, Montluçon, France); levocabastine hydrochloride and noberastine dimaleate (Janssen Research, Beerse, Belgium); cetirizine dihydrochloride (UCB Pharma, Braine L'Alleud, Belgium); abecarnil (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany); citalopram (Lundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark); gepirone hydrochloride (Bristol Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT); ipsapirone hydrochloride (Troponwerke, Cologne, Germany); LY-228729 (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN); methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ciba-Geigy Co., Basel, Switzerland); tandospirone citrate (metanopirone; Sumitomo, Osaka, Japan); flesinoxan hydrochloride, lesopitron dihydrochloride, paroxetine hydrochloride, S 14506, WAY-100635 dihydrochloride and WY-50324 hydrochloride (adatanserin) (synthesized by J.-L. Maurel, Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre).
For receptor binding studies, F 11440 and buspirone were dissolved in ethanol (10-20%), and flesinoxan was dissolved in distilled water. In the cAMP experiments, compounds were dissolved in DMSO, except 5-HT, 8-OH-DPAT, flesinoxan and tryptamine, which were dissolved in water. For in vivo studies, diazepam, F 11440, LY-228729, NAN-190, paroxetine, S 14506, tandospirone and WY 50,324 were suspended in distilled water by adding Tween 80 (2 drops/10 ml). All other drugs were dissolved in distilled water. An injection volume of 1 ml/100g was used throughout, except for intramuscular and intravenous injections, which were administered using a volume of 1 ml/kg. When injected i.v., F 11440 and flesinoxan were dissolved in a mixture of 60% PEG and 40% physiological saline. Doses are expressed as the weight of the free base.| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radioligand Binding
F 11440 had nanomolar affinity for 5-HT1A
binding sites (Ki: 4.8 nM,
pKi, 8.33); its affinity for these sites
was ~7-fold higher than that of buspirone
(pKi, 7.50), and ~4-fold lower than that
of flesinoxan (pKi, 8.91). F 11440 was
more selective for 5-HT1A sites than either
buspirone or flesinoxan (fig. 2). Whereas the affinity of F 11440 for 5-HT1A sites was
100-fold higher than its affinity for the other serotonin receptor
subtypes examined here [i.e., h
5-HT1B, h 5-HT1D,
5-HT2A and 5-HT2C:
pKi < 5.0), for dopamine
D2 receptors (pKi,
5.75), for alpha-1 noradrenergic receptors
(pKi, 6.16), and for histamine
H1 receptors (pKi < 5.0)], this was not the case for buspirone or for flesinoxan.
Buspirone had relatively high affinity for dopamine
D2 sites (pKi,
7.43), and its affinity for alpha-1 adrenergic and
H1 histamine receptors (pKi, 6.04 and 6.41, respectively) was
<100-fold lower than its 5-HT1A affinity.
Compared with buspirone, flesinoxan was more 5-HT1A selective with respect to
alpha-1 adrenergic and histamine H1
receptors (pKi, 6.50 and 6.75, respectively). Compared with F 11440, however, flesinoxan was less
selective with respect to h 5-HT1D, h
5-HT1B, D2
(pKi, 7.86, 7.19 and 7.05, respectively) and H1 receptors.
|
cAMP in HA7 Cells
In cells transfected with human 5-HT1A
receptors, F 11440 inhibited forskolin-induced stimulation of cAMP with
a pEC50 value of 6.80 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) (fig. 3, top). The
pEC50 values obtained with other compounds that
exerted 5-HT1A agonist activity [i.e,
5-HT (7.48 ± 0.19), 8-OH-DPAT (7.59 ± 0.22), buspirone
(6.70 ± 0.17), ipsapirone (7.34 ± 0.24), flesinoxan
(7.69 ± 0.18), methysergide (5.61 ± 0.06) and tryptamine
(5.36 ± 0.01) (not shown)] correlated positively (r = .96, P < .001) with values reported elsewhere (Pauwels et
al., 1993
).
|
The maximal inhibition of forskolin-induced stimulation of cAMP
produced by a compound in HA7 cells offers one measure of its intrinsic
activity at 5-HT1A receptors. The partial
5-HT1A agonists buspirone and ipsapirone
inhibited forskolin-induced stimulation, but only to ~60% of
control, whereas the full agonist 5-HT inhibited the effects of
forskolin more extensively, to ~10% of control (fig. 3, middle). At
a concentration of 10
5 M, F 11440 inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP to a significantly greater extent
than buspirone and ipsapirone. At a concentration of
10
4 M, F 11440 inhibited cAMP levels to
9.4 ± 1.4% (mean ± S.E.M.) of control, a value that was
significantly lower than that obtained with
10
4 M flesinoxan (i.e., 17 ± 2.2%) and not significantly different from the value obtained with
5-HT (i.e., 10.7 ± 1.8%) (fig. 3, bottom).
Expressing the mean (n = 3-9) maximal inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP production observed with each compound tested in the pigeon conflict procedure (see below) as a proportion of the
maximal effect produced by 5-HT, the following values were obtained: F
11440: 1.0, S 14506: 0.95, flesinoxan: 0.93, LY-228729: 0.88, tandospirone: 0.87, 8-OH-DPAT: 0.81, WY 50,324: 0.79, gepirone: 0.77, lesopitron: 0.70, buspirone: 0.49, ipsapirone: 0.46, BMY 7378: 0.0 and
NAN 190: 0.0. The intrinsic activities of flesinoxan, 8-OH-DPAT,
gepirone, buspirone, and ipsapirone, correlated positively (r = .76, rs = .90) with those reported previously in
Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human
5-HT1A receptor (McCall et al., 1994
).
In Vivo Microdialysis
The mean basal extracellular level of 5-HT in ventral hippocampus was 34 ± 1.2 fmol/20 µl (n = 55). F 11440, administered i.p., dose-dependently decreased the extracellular level of 5-HT (fig. 4). Its ED50 value, calculated from the percent AUC data, was 0.049 mg/kg. F 11440 was ~30-fold more potent than buspirone, and ~4-fold more potent than flesinoxan (ED50 values: 1.6 and 0.23 mg/kg, buspirone and flesinoxan, respectively; its maximal effect (AUC = 34%) was similar to that of buspirone (37%) and flesinoxan (37%) (data not shown). The effects of 0.16 mg/kg F 11440 were blocked completely by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635 [ED50: 0.021 mg/kg; fig. (4].
|
Stimulation of Corticosterone Secretion
In vehicle control rats (n = 175, i.p.; n = 150, p.o.), the mean plasma corticosterone level was 73 ± 10 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/ml after i.p. administration and 45 ± 9.1 ng/ml after p.o. administration. Levels >410 ng/ml occurred in <5% of the i.p. controls, and levels >250 ng/ml occurred in <5% of the p.o. controls. Drugs were therefore considered to produce an effect in an individual animal if the observed corticosterone level was >410 ng/ml when administered i.p., or >250 ng/ml when administered p.o.
F 11440 dose-dependently increased corticosterone levels (fig. 5), and the ED50 value to produce these effects when administered p.o. (i.e., 0.16 mg/kg) was ~3-fold higher than the ED50 obtained after i.p. injection (i.e., 0.057 mg/kg). When administered i.p., F 11440 was ~60-fold more potent than buspirone (ED50: 3.4 mg/kg) and ~20-fold more potent than flesinoxan (ED50: 1.2 mg/kg); its maximal effect (680 ± 41 ng/ml) was similar to that of buspirone (610 ± 59 ng/ml) and flesinoxan (540 ± 38 ng/ml) (data not shown). The effects of 0.16 mg/kg F 11440 (i.p.) on corticosterone levels were blocked completely by WAY-100635 (ED50: 0.0027 mg/kg; fig. (5); this dose of F 11440 also produced LLR (see below), which was similarly blocked by WAY-100635 (ED50: 0.0025 mg/kg; data not shown).
|
LLR and Elements of the 5-HT Syndrome
An LLR or FPT score of 1 or more or the presence of FBP [scored as (1)] each occurred in <5% of the vehicle control animals (n = 225, i.p.) during the observation period centered at 15 min after the administration of vehicle. Drugs were therefore considered to produce an effect in an individual animal when scores higher than zero were obtained.
After i.p. administration in rats, F 11440 produced LLR and, at higher doses, FPT and FBP (table 2). This profile was similar to that of 5-HT1A agonists, such as 8-OH-DPAT, but differed from that of partial 5-HT1A agonists (e.g., buspirone) and putative 5-HT1A antagonists (e.g., NAN-190), which did not produce FPT, and from that of 5-HT agonists lacking substantial 5-HT1A affinity (i.e., DOI, mCPP, TFMPP and quipazine), which did not produce LLR (data not shown). F 11440 was ~5 times more potent than flesinoxan, and ~18 times more potent than buspirone, in producing LLR.
|
At various intervals after its administration, F 11440 produced LLR with a p.o. potency that was similar to its i.v. potency (data not shown). A comparison of the ED50 values after p.o. and i.v. administration at 60 min (i.e., 0.26 and 0.30 mg/kg, respectively) and at 120 min (i.e., 0.79 and 1.4 mg/kg, respectively) indicated that these values did not differ by more than a factor of 1.8.
DS Effects of 8-OH-DPAT
The discrimination of 8-OH-DPAT (0.16 mg/kg) from saline was acquired within 100 sessions by 23 of the 27 rats (median sessions to criterion: 32; range: 17-88). Administration of the training drug under test conditions produced dose-related increases in drug-appropriate responding (ED50: 0.065 mg/kg, table 3) that reached a 100% level of effect at the training dose. A significant decrease of the overall rate of responding (79% of control) was produced only by the training dose.
|
F 11440 produced dose-dependent responding on the 8-OH-DPAT lever
(ED50: 0.021 m/kg) that reached a 100% level of
effect at a dose of 0.08 mg/kg. Only a higher dose (i.e.,
0.16 mg/kg) decreased significantly the overall rate of responding
(55% of control). F 11440 was ~30-fold more potent than flesinoxan
and buspirone to produce 8-OH-DPAT lever selection. In contrast to F
11440, flesinoxan and buspirone, which produced 8-OH-DPAT lever
selection in
89% of the animals, chlordiazepoxide and ethanol
produced DL selection in no more than 67% and 50% of the animals,
respectively, at doses that decreased the overall rate of responding.
Duration of Action
F 11440 produced LLR at each of the pretreatment intervals (fig. 6). The lowest ED50 value (0.085 mg/kg) was observed at the first observation time, whereupon it increased to 19 mg/kg at 8 hrs after administration. Based on the time during which the ED50 was <4 times the lowest ED50, the duration of action of F 11440 was estimated to be 1.3 hr, similar to that of flesinoxan and buspirone, and shorter than the other 5-HT1A agonists shown.
|
In Vivo Selectivity
Alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist activity. Inhibition of the increase in blood pressure induced in anesthetized rats by the i.v. administration of the alpha-1-adrenoceptor agonist, methoxamine, was used as an in vivo measure of peripheral alpha-1 antagonist properties. Methoxamine (0.16 mg/kg, i.v.) increased mean arterial pressure from a base-line value of 115 ± 5 mm Hg to a peak value of 175 ± 3 mm Hg (n = 18). Prazosin, 5-methyl-urapidil and urapidil dose-dependently antagonized the increase in mean arterial pressure induced by methoxamine, with ID50 values of 0.16, 0.36 and 1.0 mg/kg i.p., respectively. According to the measure used here, F 11440 exerted alpha-1 antagonist activity in vivo, but only at doses that were ~70-fold higher than those that produced 5-HT1A agonist effects (e.g., increases in corticosterone levels; fig. 7). In contrast, flesinoxan, although it had high selectivity for 5-HT1A receptors in vitro, exerted alpha-1 antagonist activity in vivo at doses <3-fold higher than those needed to produce 5-HT1A agonist effects.
|
Dopamine antagonist activity.
A total of 140 animals received
a vehicle control treatment via either the s.c. or i.p.
route, 30 min before the injection of methylphenidate (40 mg/kg i.p.).
Gnawing was prominent after methylphenidate administration (9.7 ± 0.02; mean ± S.E.M.); sniffing, rearing and locomotion, although
increased at doses from 0.63 to 10 mg/kg (Koek and Colpaert, 1993
), did
not occur after administration of the 40 mg/kg dose. Gnawing scores of
9 or 10 were observed in >95% of the animals treated with the 40 mg/kg dose of methylphenidate. Thus, a pretreatment was considered to
have decreased the incidence of gnawing in an individual animal when a
score <9 was observed. In control animals not receiving
methylphenidate (n = 104), gnawing, locomotion,
rearing, sniffing and licking each appeared with an average incidence
of <1, and the scores obtained in <5% of the animals were as
follows: gnawing (1), locomotion (5), sniffing (9), rearing (7), and
licking (1). Test compounds were therefore considered to have
normalized methylphenidate-induced behaviors in individual animals if
the following composite criterion was met: gnawing < 2, locomotion < 6, sniffing < 10, rearing < 8, and
licking < 2.
Histamine antagonist activity. The average preconvulsion time in guinea pigs exposed to a histamine aerosol after being pretreated with vehicle control (n = 66) was 47 ± 0.5 sec, and 95% of these controls showed preconvulsion times shorter than 55 sec. Thus, a pretreatment was considered to protect an individual animal if the preconvulsion time was longer than 55 sec. In addition, two other levels of protection from the effects of histamine were defined: (1) preconvulsion time longer than 70 sec (i.e., prolongation of the mean control preconvulsion time by >50%), and (2) preconvulsion time longer than 180 sec (i.e., protection from the effects of histamine during the entire 3 min exposure period).
Using the 180 sec protection criterion, the following potency order was found for the histamine H1 antagonists tested: levocabastine (0.028 mg/kg, p.o.) > noberastine (0.068) > ketotifen (0.20) > astemizole (0.27) > cetirizine (1.2) > terfenadine (3.1) > tripolidine (12) > pyrilamine (28) > promethazine (75). The alpha-1-adrenergic antagonist, prazosin, tested at doses up to 160 mg/kg, was unable to protect from the effects of histamine. F 11440, which lacked affinity for H1 receptors, did not protect against the preconvulsant effects of a histamine aerosol in guinea pigs (fig. 8) when tested p.o. at 40 mg/kg, a dose 250-fold higher than the p.o. dose at which F 11440 exerted in vivo 5-HT1A agonist activity (i.e., 0.16 mg/kg). In contrast, flesinoxan had moderate affinity for histamine H1 receptors, and had antihistaminergic activity in vivo at doses that were 18-150 fold higher (depending on the protection criterion used) than the doses that had in vivo 5-HT1A agonist properties.
|
DS effects of chlordiazepoxide and ethanol. The discrimination between chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) and saline was acquired within 100 sessions by all 29 rats trained (median sessions to criterion: 26; range: 14-60). Chlordiazepoxide produced dose-dependent responding on the DL [ED50: 1.3 mg/kg; table (3)] that reached a 100% level of effect. At doses ~7-fold higher than those that produced 8-OH-DPAT-like DS effects, F 11440 produced DL selection (ED50: 0.14 mg/kg), but with a maximal effect of 60% at a dose (0.16 mg/kg) at which lever selection occurred in only five of the seven animals tested and that was higher than the lowest dose (0.08 mg/kg) that significantly decreased the overall rate of responding. Ethanol and 8-OH-DPAT produced DL selection in a maximum of only 14 and 25% of the animals, respectively. Buspirone and flesinoxan did not produce DL selection.
The discrimination between ethanol (1250 mg/kg) and saline was acquired within 100 sessions by 26 of the 27 rats trained (median sessions to criterion: 33.5; range: 9-80). Like ethanol, chlordiazepoxide produced dose-dependent responding on the ethanol lever that reached >90%. At a dose ~8-fold higher than that which produced 8-OH-DPAT-like DS effects, F 11440 produced a maximum of 50% DL selection and decreased the rate of responding. Of the other 5-HT1A agonists tested, only flesinoxan produced >50% DL selection, at a dose that also had response rate-decreasing effects.Pigeon Conflict Procedure
For the 58 pigeons used in this study, the median shock intensity was 4.5 mA (range: 2-5 mA) and body weights were maintained at an average of 79 ± 1% of control (mean ± S.E.M.). Mean rates of responding under the different components of the multiple schedule before testing began were 2.19 ± 0.06 and 0.07 ± 0.01 responses/sec, unpunished and punished responding, respectively. Thus, under control conditions, response rates during the punished components were suppressed by >90% relative to shock-free response rates. Among the groups tested in the present experiment, mean control rates of punished responding ranged from 0.003 ± 0.001 to 0.07 ± 0.022 responses/sec and the number of control punished responses emitted in individual pigeons ranged from 0 to 247.
The prototypical 5-HT1A agonists as well as the benzodiazepines, chlordiazepoxide and abecarnil, produced dose-related percentage increases in punished responding (fig. 9), and did so, in general, along inverted U-shaped dose-response functions, with the descending limb corresponding to the onset of effects on unpunished responding. F 11440 produced significant and substantial increases of punished responding over a wide range of doses that did not significantly affect the rate of unpunished responding. In comparison with other 5-HT1A agonists (fig. 9, table 4), F 11440 was (1) among the most potent compounds to increase punished responding, (2) produced its effects on punished responding over a range of doses that was wider than that of all other compounds tested, except 8-OH-DPAT, (3) had maximal effects on punished responding similar to those of 8-OH-DPAT, but higher than all other compounds, (4) increased punished responding in a percentage of pigeons higher than any of the other 5-HT1A agonists, except 8-OH-DPAT, and (5) exerted its effects on punished responding at doses lower than those affecting unpunished responding. In particular, the antipunishment effects of F 11440 were more substantial than those of buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan, which significantly increased punished responding at best at only one dose, with maximal effects lower than those of F 11440 and at doses similar to those that decreased unpunished responding.
|
|
The potencies with which the 5-HT1A agonists
increased punished responding in pigeons were correlated positively
(r = .7, P < .05; fig. 10)
with their ability to produce lower lip retraction in rats. The
magnitude of the effects on punished responding observed here with the
5-HT1A agonists, 8-OH-DPAT, S 14506, flesinoxan, buspirone BMY 7378, and NAN-190, correlated positively (r = .81, P < .05; data not shown) with the magnitude of their
antipunishment effects in pigeons reported previously (Colpaert
et al., 1992
). Further, the maximal effects on punished
responding of all 5-HT1A agonists examined here
correlated positively (r = .74, P < .005; rs = .78, P < .005; fig. 10) with their
intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors, which was
measured by expressing the mean maximal inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP production observed with each compound as a
proportion of the maximal effect produced by 5-HT.
|
Forced Swimming Test
The results obtained with F 11440, flesinoxan, ipsapirone, buspirone, imipramine and paroxetine are summarized in figure 11 and are expressed as percentage inhibition of the median immobility time observed in control animals (control medians ranged from 140 to 162 sec).
|
F 11440, administered once, p.o., 60 min before the test session, potently inhibited immobility over a range of doses, and the apparent maximal effect was higher than that of flesinoxan, ipsapirone, and buspirone. F 11440 significantly inhibited immobility at all five doses tested. In contrast, flesinoxan and ipsapirone significantly inhibited immobility at no more than two doses. Buspirone did not decrease immobility, but actually increased it.
Both the classical tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, and the more recently described selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressant, paroxetine, were able to inhibit immobility. Their ability to inhibit immobility was statistically significant, yet moderate, after a single administration, but was more pronounced after three administrations, at 24, 4 and 1 hr before the test session. When administered repeatedly, imipramine inhibited immobility at doses ranging from 5 to 80 mg/kg. The ability of higher doses to inhibit immobility could not be examined, because the repeated administration of 320 mg/kg imipramine had lethal effects. Paroxetine, when administered repeatedly, dose-dependently and significantly inhibited immobility, and attained its maximum effect at a dose of 80 mg/kg. Repeated administration of 320 mg/kg (i.e., 4-fold higher than the dose of paroxetine that produced the maximum effect after one administration) had lethal effects. Only paroxetine was able to produce antidepressant-like effects of a magnitude similar to that produced by a single administration of F 11440 but only when paroxetine was administered repeatedly.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
F 11440 is a potent, selective and efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist. Its affinity for 5-HT1A binding sites was higher than that of the partial agonist, buspirone, which is clinically available as an anxiolytic, and somewhat lower than that of the reportedly higher-efficacy 5-HT1A agonist, flesinoxan, which is in phase III of clinical development as an anxiolytic/antidepressant. In vivo, F 11440 was ~4 to 10 times more potent than flesinoxan, and nearly 100 times more potent than buspirone, in exerting 5-HT1A agonist activity after oral administration. F 11440 did not have detectable antidopaminergic or antihistaminergic activity (unlike buspirone and flesinoxan, respectively) and had a 70-fold separation between its 5-HT1A agonist and alpha-1 antagonist properties in vivo, unlike flesinoxan, which showed a <3-fold separation. F 11440 had intrinsic activity at human 5-HT1A receptors higher than that of buspirone, ipsapirone, and flesinoxan. Thus, F 11440 appears to be a more potent, a more selective and a more efficacious 5-HT1A receptor agonist than buspirone and flesinoxan.
F 11440 is the outcome of a research effort guided by the hypothesis
that high intrinsic activity is necessary for
5-HT1A agonists to produce large anxiolytic and
antidepressant effects (Colpaert et al., 1992
; De Vry,
1996
). This hypothesis was supported by the finding that intrinsic
activity at 5-HT1A receptors correlated positively with the magnitude of anxiolytic-like effects and the finding of a positive relation between intrinsic activity at
5-HT1A receptors and the magnitude of
antidepressant-like effects. Indeed, F 11440, which showed higher
intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors than
buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan, exerted, in the animal models
used here more substantial anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects
than buspirone, ipsapirone and flesinoxan. Furthermore, the only
compound able to produce antidepressant-like effects of a magnitude
similar to that produced by a single administration of F 11440 was
paroxetine, but p