![]() |
|
|
Vol. 286, Issue 2, 650-656, August 1998
Departments of Cardiovascular, Renal and Pulmonary Pharmacology and Medicinal Chemistry, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study describes the pharmacological profile of ((E)-alpha-[[1-butyl-5-[2-[(2-carboxyphenyl)methoxy]-4-methoxy-phenyl]-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]methlene]-6-methoxy-1,3-benzodioxole-5-propanoic acid) (SB 234551), a high-affinity, nonpeptide endothelin type A (ETA)-selective receptor antagonist. In human cloned ETA and endothelin type B (ETB) receptors, SB 234551 produced a concentration-dependent displacement of [125I]-endothelin-1 with Ki values of 0.13 and 500 nM, respectively. SB 234551 elicited concentration-dependent, rightward competitive shifts in the endothelin-1 concentration-response curves in isolated rat aorta and isolated human pulmonary artery (ETA receptor-mediated vascular contraction) with Kb values of 1.9 and 1.0 nM, respectively. SB 234551 antagonized ETB receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in the isolated rabbit pulmonary artery, as demonstrated by concentration-dependent, rightward shifts in the sarafotoxin S6c concentration-response curves (Kb = 555 nM). SB 234551 produced weak functional inhibition of sarafotoxin S6c-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation (IC50 = 7 µM). SB 234551 (10 µM) had no significant effect against contraction produced by several other vasoactive agents and did not significantly influence radioligand binding to a number of diverse receptors. SB 234551 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg i.v.) dose-dependently inhibited the pressor response to exogenous endothelin-1 in conscious rats. In vivo pharmacokinetic analysis in the rat demonstrated that SB 234551 was rapidly absorbed from the GI tract with a bioavailability of 30%. SB 234551 had a plasma half-life of 125 min and a systemic clearance of 25.0 ml/min/kg. The present study demonstrates that SB 234551 is an antagonist with high affinity for the ETA receptor, while sparing the ETB receptor. SB 234551 is a new pharmacological tool that should assist in the elucidation of the role of endothelin in pathophysiology.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A
critical need in the search for endothelin-based therapeutics is
clarification of the physiological and pathophysiological functions of
the endothelin receptor subtypes. Effects associated with
ETA receptor activation include vasoconstriction, mitogenic activity, electrolyte excretion, microvascular permeability and release
of biological mediators (Ohlstein et al., 1995
). In
contrast, the ETB receptor is associated with both
vasodilator and vasoconstrictor actions, as well as effects on neuronal
function (Ohlstein et al., 1995
). On the basis of the
in vivo effects of ETB receptor agonists, such
as S6c and IRL-1620, studies from a number of laboratories have
suggested the presence of two ETB receptor subtypes, one mediating vasodilation and the other mediating vasoconstriction (Warner
et al., 1993a
,b
; MacLean et al., 1994
; Ohlstein
et al., 1994a
; Douglas et al., 1995b
). These
ETB receptor subtypes have been tentatively designated as
ETB1 and ETB2 (Douglas et al., 1995a
). The endothelin receptor antagonists RES-701 and PD 142893 have
both been reported to be ETB1-selective antagonists in
functional assays (Warner et al., 1993a
; Douglas et
al., 1995b
). These compounds show no functional antagonist
activity, even at concentrations up to 10 µM, against responses
apparently mediated by the ETB2 receptor (Warner et
al., 1993a
; Douglas et al., 1995a
; Hay et al., 1996
). In radioligand binding studies using cloned human ETB receptors, however, these antagonists have
Ki values in the submicromolar range.
Accordingly, on the basis of pharmacological functional studies, the
cloned human ETB receptor most closely resembles the
ETB1-mediated response functionally linked to vasodilation. However, inasmuch as the available pharmacological data suggest the
presence of heterogeneous functional ETB receptor subtypes, confirmation by conventional protein purification/molecular cloning is
necessary before their existence can be firmly established.
Although the recent identification of peptide and nonpeptide receptor
antagonists represents an important milestone in endothelin research,
it is likely that elucidation of the role of ET-1 in the
pathophysiology of diseases will require the clinical testing of
high-affinity, structurally distinct compounds with a range of
selectivities for the ETA and the ETB receptors
and their subtypes. We have reported recently on the discovery and
characterization of a high-affinity mixed
ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, SB 217242 (Ohlstein et al., 1996
). However, a high-affinity
ETA-selective antagonist that exerts reduced effects on the
ETB1 receptor mediating vasodilation, while maintaining the
inhibition of the ETB2 vasoconstrictor effects demonstrated
by SB 217242, would appear to have an attractive compound profile. In
this study, we report on the discovery and characterization of SB
234551, the lead compound from a new chemical series of high-affinity
nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists with such a profile.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Membrane preparation and radioligand binding.
Chinese
hamster ovary cells stably transfected with cloned human
ETA and ETB receptors were cultured and cell
membranes prepared as reported previously (Nambi et al.,
1994
). [125I]ET-1 binding to membrane preparations was
performed as described previously (Nambi et al., 1994
).
Briefly, assay volumes were 50 µl, and the concentrations of membrane
proteins were 0.50 and 0.05 µg/tube for human ETA and
ETB receptors, respectively. The concentrations of the
radioligands were 30 to 1000 pM for saturation-binding and 300 pM for
competition-binding experiments using the cloned human ETA
and ETB receptors. Nonspecific binding was measured in the
presence of 1 µM unlabeled ET-1. The incubations (performed for 60 min at 30°C) were stopped by dilution with cold buffer and filtration
through Whatman GF/C filters presoaked in 0.1% bovine serum albumin.
The filters were washed three times (5 ml each time) and counted using
a gamma counter.
In vitro endothelin receptor antagonist
activity.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-325 g) or New Zealand
White rabbits (2-3 kg) were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg i.p.). Rat thoracic aortae and rabbit pulmonary arteries were
excised, cleaned of adherent tissue and the vascular endothelium denuded by gently rubbing the intimal surface of the vessel with a
stainless steel probe (Ohlstein et al., 1989
). Rabbit
saphenous veins were prepared as described previously (Douglas et
al., 1995b
). Isolated vessels were cut into 4-mm rings and
suspended in 10-ml organ bath chambers containing Krebs-bicarbonate
solution (mM: NaCl, 112.0; KCl, 4.7; KH2PO4,
1.2; MgSO4, 1.2; CaCl2, 2.5;
NaHCO3, 25.0 and dextrose, 11.0. Tissue baths were
maintained at 37°C and aerated continuously with 95%
O2/5% CO2, pH = 7.35. Resting tensions of
1 gm for rat aorta, rabbit pulmonary artery and saphenous vein were
maintained throughout the experiments. Endothelial integrity was
assessed pharmacologically in terms of the ability of ACh (0.1 µM) to
produce relaxation of tissues precontracted with norepinephrine (10 µM). Tissues were equilibrated for 1 hr before the start of experiments, and isometric tensions were recorded on Beckman R-611 dynographs using Grass FTO3c force-displacement transducers.
|
(1) |
1).
In vivo hemodynamics.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats
(300-350 g) were prepared with chronic indwelling catheters, following
the protocol of Ohlstein et al., (1994b)
. Briefly, rats were
anesthetized with sodium methohexitone (100 mg/kg i.p.) and catheters
placed in the abdominal aorta (to record systemic arterial blood
pressure) and vena cava (for i.v. bolus administration of drugs)
via the left femoral artery and vein, respectively. All
tubing was tunneled under the skin and exited at the midscapular
region. Tubing was filled with a dextrose:heparin solution (0.5 g/ml
dextrose and 1000 units/ml heparin) to prevent obstructive thrombus
formation. After completion of the surgery, animals were housed in
Plexiglas cages under a 12-hr light-dark cycle with access to standard
laboratory chow and drinking water ad libitum. Animals were
allowed at least 3 days to recover from surgical intervention before
undergoing experimentation.
Pharmacokinetics of SB 234551 in rats.
The pharmacokinetic
evaluation of SB 234551 was performed as described previously (Ohlstein
et al., 1996
). Briefly, male Sprague-Dawley rats (350 gm)
were surgically prepared with indwelling cannulas in the vena cava,
femoral artery and duodenum. SB 234551 was administered as a 2-hr
intraduodenal infusion (in saline vehicle) via the duodenal cannula at a rate of 50 µg/kg/hr (total dose, 6 mg/kg). Blood samples
(110 µl) were collected from the femoral arterial cannula at various
time intervals over 1440 min. The animals received approximately 2 ml
of heparinized blood from untreated donor rats upon completion of this
leg of the study. One week later, rats were crossed over to receive SB
234551 as an i.v. infusion. SB 234551 was administered via
the femoral vein cannula at a rate of 0.20 µg/hr/kg for 2 hr.
Pharmacokinetic analysis. SB 234551 was isolated from rat plasma by liquid-liquid extraction and was quantitated by reverse-phase HPLC with MS/MS detection performed on an API III tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Sciex Instruments, Rochester, NY). The assay provided a lower limit of quantification of 5 ng/ml based on 0.05 ml plasma and was linear up to 1000 ng/ml. Plasma concentration-time profiles were analyzed using noncompartmental methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was estimated by a combination of linear and log trapezoidal methods. Plasma clearance was calculated as dose/AUC. Bioavailability was determined as dose-normalized AUC (intraduodenal)/dose-normalized AUC (intravenous). The apparent terminal half-life was estimated by least-squares linear regression analysis of the log-transformed concentration-time data.
All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals and AALAC.Calculations and statistics.
Values are expressed as
mean ± S.E.M., and n represents the number of animals
or separate experiments studied in a particular group. Statistical
analysis was conducted using ANOVA or two-tailed Student's
t test for paired samples, where appropriate, P
.05 being accepted as significant.
Materials.
All solutions were prepared daily. Endothelin
isopeptides and BQ-123 were purchased from American Peptide Co. (Santa
Clara, CA). [125I]ET-1 (2200 Ci/mmol) was obtained from
New England Nuclear (Boston, MA). All other chemicals were of the
highest grades available. SB 234551, SB 209670, SB 217242, PD 156707, L-749,329, BQ-788 and bosentan were synthesized in the Department of
Medicinal Chemistry, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (King of
Prussia, PA). RES-701 (Matsuda et al., 1993
) was kindly
provided by Kyowa Hakko Kogyo (Tokyo, Japan).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radioligand binding to human ETA/ETB receptors. Competition of [125I]-ET-1 binding to recombinant human ETA and ETB receptors by unlabeled ET-1, ET-3 and the subtype-selective ligands S6c, BQ-123, and SB 234551 is shown in figure 1. Whereas ET-1 displayed similar affinities for ETA and ETB receptors (IC50 = 0.3 and 0.2 nM, respectively), ET-3 had approximately 500-fold lower affinity for ETA receptors, with IC50 values of 100 and 0.2 nM for ETA and ETB, respectively (fig. 1). Similarly, S6c had an IC50 of 0.5 nM for the ETB receptor (fig. 1, bottom panel), whereas BQ-123 displayed an IC50 of 50 nM for the ETA receptor (fig. 1, top panel). In addition, BQ-123 displayed weak affinity for the cloned human ETB receptors, and S6C displayed weak affinity toward the cloned human ETA receptor.
|
|
In vitro functional activity.
SB 234551 (10-1000
nM) produced concentration-dependent, parallel rightward shifts in the
ET-1 concentration-response curves in the isolated rat aorta (fig.
2). The contractile response elicited by
ET-1 in this tissue is mediated by the ETA receptor
(Ohlstein et al., 1996
). The Kb value
for inhibition of ET-1-induced contraction for SB 234551 was 1.9 ± 0.1 nM (fig. 2). Schild analysis of these concentration-response
curves yielded a slope of the regression line of 0.97, which was not
significantly different from unity. ET-1-induced maximal contraction in
the isolated rat aorta was not significantly affected by SB 234551. No
agonist activity was observed with SB 234551 at the highest
concentration studied (10 µM).
|
|
|
|
|
Inhibition of endothelin-induced pressor responses in conscious normotensive rats. Changes in mean arterial pressure in response to bolus i.v. injections of a submaximal dose of ET-1 (100 pmol/kg, the approximate ED75) were measured at 30-min intervals before and after bolus i.v. administration of vehicle or SB 234551 (0.1, 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg) in conscious, chronically catheterized male Sprague-Dawley rats. Unlike responses in anesthetized rats, the change in blood pressure after the bolus injection of ET-1 is of brief duration (3-5 min) and repeatable in short intervals without tachyphylaxis, as illustrated by the values for the vehicle-treated group in figure 5. Basal mean arterial blood pressure averaged 111 ± 2.5 mmHg for all rats and was not statistically different between groups; neither was it altered by the injection of various doses of SB 234551. The change in blood pressure after injections of 100 pmol/kg ET-1 was 35 ± 2 mmHg during the control period. SB 234551 (0.1-1 mg/kg) inhibited the pressor response to ET-1 in a dose-dependent manner (fig. 5). Maximal inhibition (80%) was observed with a dose of 1.0 mg/kg at 30 min after dosing, and the response to ET-1 gradually returned to control levels by 4 hr.
|
Oral pharmacokinetics of SB 234551 in conscious normotensive rats. Disposition kinetics and oral performance of SB 234551 were assessed in conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats. These investigations involved cross-over studies in multiple-cannulated rats to quantify the extent of absorption (intraduodenal infusion) and pharmacokinetic linearity. The plasma concentration-time profile demonstrated that SB 234551 was rapidly absorbed after intraduodenal infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters are summarized in table 4. The systemic plasma clearance of SB 234551 was 25.0 ml/min/kg, and the intraduodenal bioavailability was 30%. The terminal plasma half-life values after i.v. and intraduodenal routes were similar: approximately 129 and 125 min, respectively.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The development of high-affinity and subtype-selective receptor
antagonists is expanding our understanding of the role of endothelin in
pathophysiology. We have recently reported the development of a novel
indane series of compounds that are high-affinity antagonists of both
ETA and ETB receptors (Ohlstein et
al., 1994a
,b
, 1996
). Although the prototype molecule, SB 209670, is a high-affinity, selective endothelin receptor antagonist, there is
only a 50-fold difference between the affinity at the ETA
receptor and that at the ETB receptor. It is still not
clear what is the optimal endothelin receptor subtype selectivity for
endothelin-based therapeutics. On the basis of current understanding,
however, it appears that receptors that are defined as ETB1
mediate vasodilation and can be regarded as "beneficial," whereas
stimulation of the purported ETB2 receptors produces
undesired effects such as smooth muscle contraction (Douglas et
al., 1995a
,b
). This hypothesis has to be clarified, so compounds
that differentiate between the vasodilator ETB1 and the
vasoconstrictor ETB2 receptors would help to delineate further the role of endothelin in the etiology of cardiovascular and
other diseases. Such compounds would also provide information on the
optimal profile for a therapeutically useful endothelin receptor
antagonist for specific disorders.
In this report, we describe the pharmacological characterization of SB
234551, the lead compound from a new series of pyrazole endothelin
receptor antagonists. SB 234551 has a unique receptor selectivity
profile; binding studies indicate that the compound has approximately
5000-fold more affinity for the cloned human ETA receptor
than for the cloned human ETB receptor (table 1). There was
a good correlation between the affinity of SB 234551 for recombinant
human ETA receptors from the results of radioligand binding
and functional studies: in the former the Ki for
SB 234551 was 0.13 nM, and the Kb values for
inhibition of ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction in the isolated rat aorta
and human pulmonary artery were 1.9 and 1.0 nM, respectively. These
data indicate that SB 234551 is one of the highest-affinity endothelin
receptor antagonists yet reported in human vascular tissue. In
contrast, it is interesting to note that in human pulmonary artery,
neither bosentan nor PD 156707 produced significant inhibition of
ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction, despite high affinity in the cloned
human ETA receptor. In particular, convincing evidence
exists that the responses in human large pulmonary artery appear to be
mediated predominantly, if not exclusively, via
ETA receptors: 1) S6c, the ETB receptor ligand,
has no effect on basal vascular tone (Hay et al., 1993
), and
2) ET-1-induced responses are inhibited potently by BQ-123 (Hay
et al., 1993
; Buchan et al., 1994
). The lack of
activity of bosentan or PD 156707 has not been explained, but it may
indicate the presence of an ETA receptor subtype that has
differential sensitivity to the available endothelin receptor
antagonists. Alternatively, it may be due to differences in antagonist
affinities, which have also been reported for cultured human pulmonary
smooth muscle cells (Hatakeyama et al., 1994
) and in
functional studies in this same tissue (Buchan et al.,
1994
). Nonetheless, the present data support the interpretation that
ET-1 produces vascular contraction of the human pulmonary artery by
stimulating the ETA receptor, an effect antagonized
significantly by SB 234551.
Numerous reports have demonstrated that multiple ETB
receptor subtypes exist (Warner et al., 1993a
,b
; Sudjarwo
et al., 1993
; Karaki et al., 1994
, MacLean
et al., 1994
; Douglas et al., 1995b
; Gellai
et al., 1996
; McCulloch and MacLean, 1995
, 1996
). For
example, an ETB receptor found on the vascular endothelium
has been associated with endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. This
receptor has been termed "ETB1-like." In the isolated
rabbit saphenous vein, SB 234551 weakly inhibits
ETB-mediated release of endothelium-dependent vasodilation
(IC50 = 7 µM), in contrast to SB 209670 (3 nM), BQ-788 (300 nM) and RES 701 (300 nM) (table 3). The other ETB
receptor, designated "ETB2-like," has been implicated
in endothelin-mediated vasoconstriction (Warner et al.,
1993a
,b
; Douglas et al., 1995b
; Hay et al.,
1996
). The rabbit pulmonary artery possesses ETB2-like receptors, and SB 234551 produces functional inhibition of the ETB2-like receptor, as demonstrated by antagonism of
S6c-mediated contraction of the isolated rabbit pulmonary artery
(Kb = 555 nM). Although the affinity of SB
234551 in this tissue is modest, experiments with SB 209670 and SB
217242 also show a disparity between inhibition of rabbit and human
ETB receptor-mediated constriction, the latter two
compounds being more potent in human bronchial ETB
receptors (Hay et al., 1996
).
The functional roles of ETA and ETB receptors
have been studied previously in the canine kidney (Brooks et
al., 1994
, 1995
). In these studies renal vasoconstriction was
shown to be mediated by ETA receptors, and ETB
receptor stimulation inhibited sodium reabsorption. Furthermore, the
ETB1 receptor subtype was shown to mediate tubular sodium
reabsorption, because RES-701 antagonized ETB1-mediated
natriuresis induced by S6c or ET-1 (in the presence of BQ-123). In
addition, ETB1 receptors may induce renal vasodilation. The
in vivo demonstration of the ETB1 receptor
sparing activity of SB 234551 has been demonstrated in this same model
(Brooks et al., 1998
). The i.v. infusion of SB 234551 (30 µg/kg/min) in anesthetized dogs was demonstrated to inhibit the
vasoconstrictor responses to exogenously administered ET-1 and
significantly to increase renal plasma flow and urinary sodium
excretion (Brooks et al., 1998
). These data indicate that SB
234551 unmasks ETB1 receptor-induced renal vasodilation and
inhibition of sodium reabsorption.
In summary, this is the first report on the pharmacological characterization of SB 234551, the lead molecule from a new pyrazole series of endothelin receptor antagonists. SB 234551 is a high-affinity antagonist of ETA/ETB2-mediated functional responses. The optimal receptor profile (i.e., ETA vs. ETB) for the most therapeutically useful endothelin receptor antagonist is not yet known, but it is likely that different diseases require compounds with different receptor subtype profiles. However, because both ETA and ETB2 receptors are involved in vasoconstriction, an antagonist with high affinity for these receptors might be predicted to provide beneficial effects.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank A. Gao, A. Konalian-Beck, S. Atkinson, M. Darcy and D. Shah for synthesis of the compounds used in this study; M. Pullen and M. Luttmann for excellent technical assistance; Dr. Kei-lei Fong for assisting in the pharmacokinetic studies and Dr. Stephen Douglas for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication April 29, 1998.
Received for publication August 1, 1997.
Send reprint requests to: Eliot H. Ohlstein, Ph.D., Department of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, UW 2511, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ET-1, endothelin-1; ET-3, endothelin-3; S6c, sarafotoxin S6c; ETA receptor, endothelin type A receptor; ETB receptor, endothelin type B receptor; SB 234551, ((E)-alpha-[[1-butyl-5-[2-[(2-carboxyphenyl)methoxy]-4-methoxy-phenyl]-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]methlene]-6-methoxy-1,3-benzodioxole-5-propanoic acid).
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. P. Davenport International Union of Pharmacology. XXIX. Update on Endothelin Receptor Nomenclature Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aleksic, Z. Szabo, U. Scheffel, H. T. Ravert, W. B. Mathews, L. Kerenyi, P. A. Rauseo, R. E. Gibson, H. D. Burns, and R. F. Dannals In Vivo Labeling of Endothelin Receptors with [11C]L-753,037: Studies in Mice and a Dog J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 1274 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Griswold, S. A. Douglas, L. D. Martin, T. G. Davis, L. Davis, Z. Ao, M. A. Luttmann, M. Pullen, P. Nambi, D. W. P. Hay, et al. Endothelin B Receptor Modulates Inflammatory Pain and Cutaneous Inflammation Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 807 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nishikibe, H. Ohta, M. Okada, K. Ishikawa, T. Hayama, T. Fukuroda, K. Noguchi, M. Saito, T. Kanoh, S. Ozaki, et al. Pharmacological Properties of J-104132 (L-753,037), a Potent, Orally Active, Mixed ETA/ETB Endothelin Receptor Antagonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1262 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||