![]() |
|
|
Vol. 285, Issue 1, 307-316, April 1998
Departments of Psychiatry (D.G.W., R.H.L.) and Pharmacology (J.M.W., R.H.L.), Neural Program in Signal Transduction, Neuroplasticity, and Drug Discovery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sodium valproate (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid with well-established anticonvulsant properties and apparent clinical efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder (manic-depressive illness). Little is known regarding the mechanism of action of VPA in the brain that could account for this clinical therapeutic profile. Lithium has been the standard treatment for bipolar disorder, and it is known to be an uncompetitive inhibitor of inositol monophosphatase in the phosphoinositide (PI) signaling cascade at clinically relevant concentrations. Recent studies have provided data in support of a role for protein kinase C and the down-regulation of expression of the myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) in the long-term therapeutic action of lithium in the brain, which is dependent on both the relative activity of receptor-coupled PI signaling and the concentration of myo-inositol. Our current results demonstrated that valproate induces a concentration- and time-dependent reduction of MARCKS in immortalized hippocampal cells that appears to be independent of both the level of muscarinic receptor-activated PI signaling as well as the concentration of myo-inositol. In CHO-K1 cells transfected with the human m1 muscarinic receptor, unlike lithium, there is no evidence for receptor-mediated accumulation of CMP-PA in the presence of VPA, providing more direct data for its lack of interaction within the PI signaling cascade. The action of VPA on MARCKS occurs within the therapeutic concentrations and time course observed in clinical studies of patients with bipolar disorder. Furthermore, the effect on MARCKS protein is additive in the presence of therapeutic concentrations of both lithium and valproate, consistent with clinical observations regarding the enhanced efficacy of the combination treatment. Finally, in studies examining acute and chronic effects of a variety of psychotropic compounds and VPA structural analogs, it is evident that the property of regulation of MARCKS is shared by the mood-stabilizers lithium and VPA, which may be specific to a class of drugs effective in the treatment of bipolar disorder.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VPA
is a short-chain fatty acid that was first discovered to have
antiepileptic effects in 1963 and consequently has been used as an
anticonvulsant in this country for nearly 20 years (Meunier et
al., 1963
; Ramsay, 1984
). In recent years, VPA has emerged as an
effective alternative to lithium in the treatment of acute mania in
patients with bipolar disorder (Gerner and Stanton, 1992
; McElroy
et al., 1992
, Bowden et al., 1994
). VPA also may have a wider spectrum of efficacy than lithium, with accumulating evidence of its use in atypical (dysphoric/mixed) mania, rapid cycling,
and secondary manias, in which lithium appears to be less clinically
effective (Calabrese and Delucchi, 1990
; Calabrese et al.,
1992
, 1993
; Bowden et al., 1994
). However, as with lithium, the mechanisms mediating the therapeutic properties of VPA in the
treatment of bipolar disorder are not clearly understood (Post et
al., 1992b
). Although the therapeutic actions of VPA have been reported to be associated with enhancement of GABAergic transmission (Petty, 1995
), these effects are often reported at rather high concentrations and may relate more to the anticonvulsant properties of
VPA than to its mood-stabilizing effects (Waldmeier, 1987
, Motohashi,
1990
). Furthermore, similar to lithium, there is a delay of several
days in the onset of clinical action, although loading strategies with
VPA have demonstrated antimanic effects at times as early as 3 days
(McElroy et al., 1996
). Thus, any mechanism postulated for
the therapeutic action of these drugs must take this delayed onset into
account (Manji et al., 1995
). Accumulating evidence from our
laboratory as well as others strongly implicate receptor-mediated PI
signaling in brain via inhibition of the enzyme IMPase in
the mechanism of action of lithium in the brain (Berridge et
al., 1982
; Godfrey, 1989
; Lenox and Watson, 1994
), a property
apparently not shared by VPA (Vadnal and Parthasarathy, 1995
).
Moreover, it has become evident that the action of chronic lithium in
the brain is mediated through subsequent regulation of PKC and the
downstream post-translational modification of selective protein
substrates (Lenox, 1987
; Manji and Lenox, 1994
; Watson and Lenox,
1996
).
PKC is a calcium-activated, DAG-dependent kinase that exists as 1 of at
least 12 structurally related isozymes and it has been implicated in
numerous cellular responses associated with regulation of signaling and
long-term events, including ion channel and gene regulation (Newton,
1995
; Nishizuka, 1995
). Numerous studies have suggested a role for PKC
in the long-term action of lithium (Lenox, 1987
; Manji and Lenox,
1994
), and recent data have provided evidence that VPA alters PKC
activity as well as the expression of
and
isozymes (Chen
et al., 1994
; Manji et al., 1996
). Previous
studies in our laboratory demonstrated that chronic (but not acute)
lithium treatment of rats, resulting in clinically relevant brain
concentrations (~1 mM), produces a significant reduction in the PKC
substrate MARCKS in the hippocampus, which persists beyond treatment
discontinuation (Lenox et al., 1992
). This lithium-induced
down-regulation of MARCKS has been demonstrated in an immortalized
hippocampal cell line (Watson and Lenox, 1996
), in which we previously
demonstrated that phorbol esters, which directly activate PKC,
down-regulate MARCKS protein expression in a PKC-dependent manner
(Watson et al., 1994
).
MARCKS is a prominent and preferential substrate in the brain for PKC,
which by virtue of phosphorylation regulates the cellular localization
and activity of this protein. MARCKS binds calmodulin in a
calcium-dependent fashion and cross-links filamentous actin, and it has
been implicated in cellular processes associated with cytoskeletal
restructuring and neuroplasticity (e.g., transmembrane signaling and neurotransmitter release) (Aderem, 1992
; Blackshear, 1993
). Inasmuch as MARCKS may also represent a molecular target for
mood stabilizers in the brain (Lenox and Watson, 1994
; Watson and
Lenox, 1996
), we sought to examine the effects of VPA, two VPA analogs,
and five unrelated psychotropic agents on MARCKS protein levels in our
immortalized hippocampal cell model. Our data provide evidence for a
concentration- and time-dependent reduction of MARCKS protein in the
immortalized hippocampal cells after exposure to VPA. Data presented
here suggest that this property of VPA and lithium is not shared by the
other psychotropic drugs examined in this study. We discuss the
putative mechanism through which VPA may be exerting its effect and
suggest that our findings have significant implications for pursuing
drug discovery efforts based on MARCKS regulation as a molecular target
for mood stabilization in the brain.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials. Drugs were purchased or provided from sources indicated in table 1. All other reagents and materials were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA).
|
Cell culture.
The immortalized hippocampal cell line HN33.dw
was used to assess drug effects on MARCKS protein expression. HN33
cells were kindly provided by Dr. Bruce Wainer (Albert Einstein College
of Medicine, Bronx, NY) and were derived from the fusion of primary neurons from the hippocampus of postnatal day 21 mice with the N18TG2
neuroblastoma cell line (Lee et al., 1990
). Cells were grown
at 37°C in DMEM containing 5% FBS. Culture medium was supplemented with the addition of VPA or other psychotropic drugs as described in
table 1. The duration of exposures ranged from 0.5 to 7 days. Drug was
delivered in a small volume (<250 µl) in distilled water or 95%
ethanol as indicated in table 1. Control cultures grown in parallel
were supplemented with vehicle only. Culture medium was changed or
cells were passaged every 3 to 4 days, and assays were performed when
cells reached 80% to 90% confluence. Cell viability was assessed by
trypan blue exclusion both before and after drug exposure. Under
control, resting conditions, MARCKS protein is located in both the
soluble and membrane fractions, with predominant localization
(70-80%) in the soluble fraction.
MARCKS quantification by Western blotting.
Harvested cells
were homogenized in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA,
1 mM PMSF, 2 mM DTE and 10 µg/ml aprotinin. Cells were sonicated to
disrupt cell membranes, and the soluble and pellet fractions were
separated by centrifugation. The homogenate was centrifuged at
100,000 × g, and the soluble fraction was collected. The pellet was resuspended in buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and
solubilized for 30 min. Solubilized fractions were then centrifuged at
50,000 × g, and the supernatant containing the
solubilized membrane protein was collected. Samples were adjusted by
addition or dilution to 0.05% Triton X-100. Equal amounts of soluble
and membrane cell protein (50-125 µg), as determined by the Bradford method, were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) in a BioRad (Hercules, CA)
Trans-Blot electrophoresis apparatus at 100 V for 2 hr using Towbin's
buffer [25 mM Tris, pH 8.3, 192 mM glycine and 20% (v/v) methanol].
A polyclonal MARCKS antibody was prepared in TS buffer (20 mM Tris, pH
7.5, and 0.5 M NaCl) and added to the transblots for overnight
incubation. Detection of the immune complex was performed using either
the biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG/avidin-conjugated peroxidase/DAB
system described previously (Watson and Lenox, 1996
) or the Pierce
(Rockford, IL) enhanced chemiluminescence system. Western blots were
quantified using NIH Image 1.47 software for densitometric analysis.
The interassay coefficient of variation for MARCKS quantitation was
calculated to be ~15% for both soluble and membrane fractions.
CMP-PA assay.
The effects of VPA and lithium on CMP-PA
accumulation were measured in the CHO-K1 (Hm1) cell line as described
previously (Lenox and Watson, 1994
). Cells were prelabeled with
[3H]cytidine for 60 min before the addition of LiCl (5 mM) or VPA (2.5 mM), with or without additional inositol (10 mM). After
10 min, carbachol (1 mM) was added, and the incubation continued for
the times indicated. Incubation was terminated with
chloroform/methanol, and phases were split by the addition of
chloroform and water. After centrifugation, the bottom layer was
removed, washed with methanol/1 M HCl and then dried down and counted
for radioactivity by liquid scintillation spectrometry.
Data analyses. For MARCKS protein, statistical analyses were conducted on data derived from densitometric scans of Western blots. Results are expressed as the percentage of MARCKS protein present in drug-free controls grown in parallel and assayed on the same Western blot. Differences between treatment conditions were determined using analysis of variance. The factors analyzed were drug concentration, treatment duration, and cell fraction (soluble and membrane). Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Fisher's PLSD. In each case, the minimum acceptable level for statistical significance was P < .05. For drug concentration experiments (tables 2 and 3, see fig. 2), statistical comparisons were made vs. the therapeutic dose of VPA (0.6 mM). For time course analyses (see fig. 1), statistical comparisons were made to the exposure of shortest duration (1 day).
|
|
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of VPA on MARCKS protein expression. HN33 cells were exposed continuously to 0.6 mM VPA for periods ranging from 12 hr to 7 days. This concentration is equivalent to 100 ng/ml, which is within the reported therapeutic range for the mood-stabilizing action of VPA (50-125 ng/ml). After chronic VPA exposure, a slight-to-moderate increase in morphological differentiation was observed in HN33 cells exposed to concentrations higher than 0.1 mM. Additionally, after long-term (>3 days) exposure, cellular growth rates were notably slower for HN33 cells exposed to VPA concentrations of >0.6 mM. Cells grown in 0.6 mM VPA for up to 7 days appeared healthy and viable, with cell viability exceeding 98% in all cultures examined.
MARCKS protein levels in both soluble and membrane fractions were measured by Western blotting and are expressed as percentage of control (fig. 1). Chronic exposure (
3 days)
produced a statistically significant decrease in MARCKS, whereas acute
exposure (12 hr to 1 day) produced no significant change. The decrease
in MARCKS was most prominent in the membrane fraction, beginning at day 3 (55% of control) and continuing through day 7 (39% of control). The
soluble fraction, in contrast, produced a more modest decrease (22%
reduction) at day 3 and appeared to plateau thereafter, with a 27%
reduction observed at 7 days. The differential effect on the cellular
fractions (soluble vs. membrane) was statistically significant after 3 to 7 days of VPA exposure (P < .05).
|
0.03
mM VPA were determined to be significantly different than in cells exposed to 0.6 mM VPA. Based on these results, the estimated
EC50 value for VPA on MARCKS protein down-regulation in
both soluble and membrane fractions is ~0.06 mM.
|
Effect of valproate analogs on MARCKS protein expression. MARCKS protein levels in HN33 cells were measured after exposure to each of two VPA analogs, HVPA and 2-PGA, for 3 or 7 days (table 3). Cells were exposed to concentrations of 0.6, 1.5 and 3.0 mM. Unlike VPA, which produced noticeable changes in cell morphology at 0.6 mM, these analogs produced no such change at this or higher concentrations. Figure 3 shows a representative Western blot of MARCKS expression in both soluble and membrane fractions after exposure to each VPA analog for 7 days (2-PGA is shown in lanes 4-6 and HVPA in lanes 7-9). For 2-PGA, in the soluble fraction, no significant reduction in MARCKS protein was apparent, even at concentrations 5 to 10 times higher than the minimal effective concentration of VPA. A small reduction in MARCKS protein in the membrane fraction was observed after 3.0 mM exposure to 2-PGA for 3 to 7 days. For HVPA, in the soluble fraction, no significant reduction in MARCKS protein was evident, even at concentrations 5 to 10 times higher than the minimal effective concentration of VPA. However, in the membrane fraction, a reduction in MARCKS protein was observed in cells exposed to 1.5 to 3.0 mM HVPA. At the highest concentration tested (3.0 mM; five times the therapeutic level of VPA), a 30% to 65% reduction in MARCKS protein was observed after 3 to 7 days of exposure.
|
Effect of combined VPA and LiCl exposure on MARCKS protein expression in HN33 cells. HN33 cells were exposed to 0.6 mM VPA and/or 1 mM LiCl/1 mM carbachol for a period of 3 days to assess the effects of the VPA lithium combination on MARCKS protein expression and distribution. Results are presented in figure 4. A greater reduction of MARCKS protein was observed in both soluble and membrane fractions of cells exposed to both VPA and lithium/carbachol than was produced by either VPA or lithium/carbachol alone. The enhanced reduction in MARCKS protein produced by the combination of VPA and lithium/carbachol at these concentrations suggests their effects to be additive. The reduction in MARCKS protein produced by the combined treatment of VPA and lithium/carbachol was greater in the membrane fraction than in the soluble fraction.
|
Effects of carbachol and myo-inositol on the
VPA-induced down-regulation of MARCKS.
To examine the role of PI
signaling in the mechanism of action of the effects of VPA on MARCKS,
cells were exposed to VPA alone or in combination with either carbachol
(1 mM) or myo-inositol (up to 1 mM). In contrast to previous
results obtained with LiCl (Watson and Lenox, 1996
), the VPA-induced
down-regulation of MARCKS protein expression was not altered by the
addition of carbachol (fig. 5) to the
culture medium. Similarly, supplementation of myo-inositol
(table 4) to the culture medium at
concentrations up to 1 mM did not modify the VPA-induced
down-regulation of MARCKS, whereas the LiCl-induced down-regulation was
prevented by the addition of as little as 5.0 µM
myo-inositol.
|
|
Effect of VPA on CMP-PA accumulation in CHO-K1 (Hm1) cells. To examine the effect of VPA on the intracellular levels of CMP-PA, we used the CHO-K1 (Hm1) cell line. CMP-PA accumulation in CHO-K1 (Hm1) cells was determined after exposure to LiCl or VPA. Cells prelabeled with [3H]cytidine were exposed to 5 mM LiCl or 2.5 mM VPA in the presence or absence of 10 mM inositol, 1 mM carbachol or both. CMP-PA accumulation was measured before or after a 60-min incubation (fig. 6). Significant accumulation of CMP-PA was observed after exposure to the combination of LiCl and carbachol. This response was attenuated by the addition of 10 mM myo-inositol to the culture medium. No CMP-PA accumulation was observed after exposure to VPA (with or without carbachol).
|
Effect of other psychotropic agents on MARCKS protein expression. Five structurally and functionally distinct psychotropic drugs (carbamazepine, fluoxetine, haloperidol, diazepam and morphine) were administered to HN33 cells for 1, 3 or 7 days, and their effects on MARCKS protein expression were assessed. Drugs were chosen to represent a wide range of psychopharmacological actions. Minimal drug concentrations were based on the therapeutically effective plasma concentration for each drug in humans as outlined in table 1. Additionally, cells were exposed to concentrations up to 20 times above therapeutic concentrations so as not to overlook potential effects at supratherapeutic doses. At each concentration tested, cell viability, growth rate and gross morphological appearance of HN33 cells exposed to each of the psychotropic drugs were not notably different than cells grown in the absence of drug. Data obtained after 3 days of exposure are shown in figure 7. For carbamazepine, cells were exposed to 10, 25 or 100 µM. No significant change in MARCKS protein expression was detected at any of the concentrations or time points tested. For fluoxetine, cells were exposed to 50, 200 or 1000 ng/ml. No significant dose effect was measured at any of the concentrations or time points tested. For haloperidol, cells were exposed to 5, 20 or 100 ng/ml. No significant dose effect was measured at any of the concentrations or time points tested. For diazepam, cells were exposed to 50, 200 or 1000 ng/ml. No significant dose effect was measured at any of the concentrations or time points tested. For morphine, cells were exposed to 5, 20 or 100 ng/ml. No significant dose effect was measured at any of the concentrations or time points tested.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VPA is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic whose exact mechanism of
anticonvulsant action is unclear. Although its acute efficacy was
originally thought to be in part a result of its reported effect on
inhibitory GABA neurotransmission, there is evidence for activity on
excitatory amino acids as well as ion channels in the brain,
particularly the voltage-dependent Na+ type (Chapman
et al., 1982
; Loscher, 1993
). In recent years, VPA has
emerged as an effective treatment for acute mania and may well possess
prophylactic properties in the management of patients with bipolar
disorder (Bowden et al., 1994
; Bowden, 1996
). Unlike its
acute efficacy in the treatment of seizure disorder, VPA, like lithium,
requires time for onset of action in the treatment of acute mania,
suggesting that its therapeutic action in the treatment of bipolar
disorder is mediated via effects on long-term processes in
the brain.
Bipolar disorder is a chronic affective disorder that affects >1% of
the U.S. population (Goodwin and Jamison, 1990
). Although lithium has
been a first-line treatment for the acute and prophylactic management
of bipolar disorder, it is estimated that almost half of patients
either fail to respond to lithium or experience such problematic side
effects that compliance becomes an issue and patients are unable to
continue treatment with lithium (Goodwin and Jamison, 1990
;
Goldberg et al., 1995
; Lenox and Manji, 1995
). The
clinical significance of noncompliance is enhanced given the elevated
risk of episode recurrence and potential for response refractoriness on
lithium discontinuation (Suppes et al., 1991
; Post et
al., 1992a
; Faedda et al., 1993
). Alternative treatment strategies over the past few years have focused on anticonvulsants based on a "kindling" model of bipolar disorder, and VPA has
recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the
treatment of acute mania.
Numerous studies, including our own, over the past several years have
confirmed that receptor-coupled PIP2 hydrolysis, which generates two second messengers (IP3, which mobilizes
intracellular calcium, and DAG, which activates PKC), is an important
site for the acute action of lithium in the brain (for reviews, see
Berridge, 1989
; Rana and Hokin, 1990
; Lenox and Manji, 1995
). Lithium,
by virtue of an interaction with one of two Mg++ enzyme
binding sites, is an uncompetitive inhibitor of IMPase, which catalyzes
the breakdown of the inositol monophosphates and the generation of free
inositol (Pollack et al., 1994
; Atack et al.,
1995
). Because the brain has limited access to inositol other than that
derived from recycling of the inositol monophosphates and the affinity
of PI synthase is relatively low, it was suggested by Berridge et
al. (1989)
that a major physiological consequence of the action of
lithium is derived through a depletion of free inositol required to
recombine with CMP-PA to replenish the PI signaling pool. Thus, lithium
might be expected to be most effective in systems undergoing the
highest rate of receptor-mediated PIP2 hydrolysis. As a
consequence of inositol depletion in the presence of lithium,
receptor-mediated accumulation of DAG or CMP-PA has been observed in a
number of cell types as well as in the brain. This increase is reversed
by the addition of inositol (Drummond and Raeburn, 1984
; Downes and
Stone, 1986
; Godfrey, 1989
). In this way, agonist-induced accumulation
of CMP-PA in both cell models and brain has been used by our laboratory
as well as others as a sensitive index of intracellular inositol
deficiency during activation of receptor-coupled PLC pathways (Kennedy
et al., 1990
; Stubbs and Agranoff, 1993
; Jenkinson et
al., 1994
; Lenox and Watson, 1994
). Thus, the action of chronic
lithium may stem initially from its inhibition of inositol recycling
through the receptor-mediated hydrolysis of PIP2 and
ultimately may be explained by its indirect action in accumulating DAG
(Lenox, 1987
, 1988
) and subsequent change in the activation of PKC
isozymes, altering the phosphorylation or expression, or both, of key
phosphoprotein substrates.
Such an hypothesis is strongly supported by our data in the CHO-K1
cells, in which we observed a significant accumulation of CMP-PA after
exposure of cells to lithium in the presence of muscarinic receptor
activation, which is prevented in the presence of excess
myo-inositol (Lenox and Watson, 1994
). These data support previously reported findings in the CHO-K1 cell model. However, in the
presence of VPA at concentrations as high as 2.5 mM, we found no
evidence for an accumulation of CMP-PA even in the presence of receptor
activation, consistent with the lack of effect of VPA on IMPase
activity.
Previous studies in our laboratory have demonstrated a significant
reduction in the expression of a prominent phosphoprotein substrate for
PKC in brain, MARCKS, on exposure to chronic lithium (Lenox et
al., 1992
; Watson and Lenox, 1996
). These findings have been
observed in both rat hippocampus and immortalized hippocampal cells in
culture. This alteration in MARCKS protein expression persists beyond
discontinuation of lithium administration and is not observed after
acute lithium exposure. In more recent studies, we demonstrated that
phorbol esters down-regulate MARCKS protein in neuronally derived cell
populations dependent on the activation of PKC isozymes (Watson
et al., 1994
). Most recently, we demonstrated in the same
immortalized hippocampal cell model that MARCKS down-regulation by
chronic therapeutic levels of lithium is dependent on both the relative
concentration of inositol and the state of receptor activation,
conferring the selective action of lithium in brain where inositol is
limiting (Watson and Lenox, 1996
). Furthermore, preliminary studies in
our laboratory have provided evidence that the lithium-induced
down-regulation of MARCKS protein is accompanied by a corresponding
reduction in MARCKS mRNA of similar magnitude (Watson and Lenox, 1997
).
These data are consistent with accumulating data from other
laboratories that have provided convincing evidence for a role of PKC
in mediating the long-term effects of lithium exposure and the
destabilization of MARCKS mRNA (Brooks et al., 1991
, 1992
;
Lindner et al., 1992
; Manji and Lenox, 1994
).
In the present study, we examined the effects of VPA on MARCKS protein
expression in immortalized hippocampal cells. HN33 cells were formed by
the somatic cell hybridization of primary hippocampal cells and N18TG2
neuroblastoma cells, and they exhibit morphological, cytoskeletal and
electrophysiological features characteristic of hippocampal neurons in
culture (Lee et al., 1990
). Exposure of HN33 cells to VPA at
concentrations up to 1 mM produced no apparent cytotoxicity; however, a
dose-dependent increase in cell doubling time was noted. This effect
was reversible on removal of the drug (data not shown). These findings
are similar to reported effects of VPA on C6 glioma cells, in which VPA
exhibited a reversible antiproliferative effect that was not
attributable to cytotoxicity (Martin and Regan, 1991
). In this study,
VPA was found to arrest cells at the postmitotic mid-G1
phase of the cell cycle. In our present study, the effects of VPA on
MARCKS protein expression appear to be unrelated to its
antiproliferative effect because MARCKS protein levels were reduced at
VPA concentrations well below the concentrations that produced the
altered growth rates.
The data presented here demonstrate that VPA exposure elicits both a
time- and concentration-dependent reduction in MARCKS protein
expression in an immortalized hippocampal cell line. Similar findings
have been observed in C6 glioma cells (H. K. Manji, personal communication). In our studies, the most robust effect of VPA on MARCKS
was observed at concentrations corresponding to the therapeutically
effective range of the drug (0.3-0.75 mM, or 50-125 µg/ml). Also
consistent with clinical observations (Bowden et al., 1994
),
in which effects of VPA are observed only after chronic administration,
a significant reduction of MARCKS protein in both soluble and membrane
fractions of HN33 cells was not observed after acute (1-day) VPA
administration. The down-regulation of MARCKS appears to be maximal at
day 3, as no further significant reduction was observed on continued
exposure (5-7 days). The effect of VPA on MARCKS was most pronounced
in the membrane fraction of these cells. This finding is in contrast to
lithium, which exerts a preferential down-regulation of MARCKS in the
soluble fraction (Watson and Lenox, 1996
). Although the significance of this finding is as yet unclear, the differences observed in the patterns of MARCKS down-regulation between these two drugs may be a
function of differences in the pathways of PKC activation, as discussed
below. This is of particular interest in light of the findings that
concomitant exposure of the immortalized hippocampal cells to both VPA
and lithium appears additive on MARCKS down-regulation at the
therapeutic concentrations of both drugs. These data are in agreement
with clinical studies that show VPA/lithium combination therapy to have
greater therapeutic efficacy for treatment of bipolar disorder than
either agent administered individually (Calabrese and Delucchi, 1989
;
Hayes, 1989
).
Muscarinic receptor activation of PI signaling potentiates the
down-regulation of MARCKS, and the addition of myo-inositol, even within the micromolar range, can both prevent and reverse the
lithium-induced reduction in MARCKS protein expression (Watson and
Lenox, 1996
). These findings clearly implicate a role for the
receptor-coupled PI signaling pathway in the mechanism of action of
chronic lithium. In contrast, addition of carbachol or inositol (even
at millimolar concentrations) to the culture medium had no effect on
the VPA-induced reduction in MARCKS, consistent with the lack of effect
of VPA on receptor-coupled accumulation of CMP-PA observed in the
CHO-K1 cells. Thus, despite the shared property of lithium and VPA in
down-regulating the expression of MARCKS, these data suggest that the
mechanism through which this occurs may involve, at least in part,
alternative pathways.
There does, however, seem to be evidence for a role of PKC regulation
in the action of both lithium and VPA. Chen et al. (1994)
reported that chronic VPA exposure of C6 glioma cells significantly reduced PKC activity in both membrane and soluble fractions, as well as
the expression of PKC isozymes
and
in intact cells, a finding
similar to that observed after chronic lithium administration in the
same cell model (Manji et al., 1993
). Subsequent studies revealed PKC-induced alterations in multiple components of the beta-adrenergic receptor-coupled cAMP-generating system,
including beta-1 adrenergic receptor, G
s and
adenylyl cyclase, each of which is phosphorylated by PKC (Chen et
al., 1996
). These data suggest that both VPA and lithium
down-regulate MARCKS via a PKC-dependent mechanism. On the
other hand, because the action of lithium appears to be mediated
via the PI signaling pathway, unlike that of VPA, there may
be a differential pattern of activation of the multiple PKC isozymes
and their temporal expression that may mediate different pathways to
the down-regulation of MARCKS expression and thereby confer different
clinical therapeutic properties. Such studies are ongoing in our
laboratory. Indeed, we recently observed that the expression of MARCKS
protein in two separate murine macrophage cell lines is unaltered after
chronic exposure to therapeutic levels of VPA (0.6 mM, 3-7 days; data
not shown). These data suggest that the action of VPA on MARCKS protein
expression could well be cell or tissue specific, or both, to the
central nervous system and could be mediated in part by the expression
pattern of the PKC isozymes specific to the cell types.
Two structural analogs of VPA, which are significantly less potent as
anticonvulsants in comparison to VPA (Chapman et al., 1982
),
were studied. Both analogs are known metabolites of VPA, although they
are produced through minor metabolic pathways and represent a minimal
percentage of total brain plasma concentration. Neither HVPA nor 2-PGA
is effective in preventing pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in mice,
and neither agent has been tested clinically for efficacy in the
treatment of bipolar disorder. In our studies, HVPA produced a
statistically significant effect in down-regulating membrane-associated
MARCKS but at a concentration well above that observed for VPA.
Comparatively, the 2-PGA analog possessed little potency in
down-regulating MARCKS in either the membrane or cytosolic fraction.
Future analysis of structural differences among these VPA compounds may
prove useful in identifying structurally related fatty acids that may
be more or less efficacious not only in down-regulation of MARCKS but
also potentially as mood stabilizers.
Exposure of immortalized hippocampal cells to structurally and
functionally diverse psychotropic agents, including fluoxetine, haloperidol, diazepam, carbamazepine and morphine, did not result in a
down-regulation of MARCKS, even at doses that were well above the
therapeutic range. Of particular note, carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant that has also been used in the treatment of mania in patients with
bipolar disorder, did not have an effect on MARCKS regulation. It is of
interest that carbamazepine has not been shown to be as effective
overall as lithium or VPA across clinical studies, particularly in a
prophylactic role as a mood stabilizer (Keck et al., 1992
),
nor has it been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this
application. In addition, we have now determined that imipramine, a
tricyclic antidepressant structurally similar to carbamazepine,
produces no significant down-regulation of MARCKS protein expression
(data not shown). Of interest, carbamazepine does appear to have
effects within the adenylyl cyclase cascade, a property shared by
lithium at higher concentrations (Mork et al., 1992
; Manji
et al., 1995
), which may contribute to its clinical properties.
Based on our current and previous studies, regulation of MARCKS expression in brain appears to be a putative target for the action of mood stabilizers in the brain that may underlie the prophylactic efficacy that serves to stabilize this illness over time. Both chronic VPA and lithium share this property at clinically relevant concentrations to the exclusion of all other psychotropic agents examined to date. Uncovering potential common molecular targets in the brain for these drugs under conditions that reflect both effective therapeutic concentrations and the time course of clinical action will provide a unique window into the pathophysiology/neurobiology of bipolar disorder. Furthermore, such findings will offer us opportunities for the design and development of the next generation of mood stabilizers, compounds that will possess broad-spectrum efficacy, minimal side effects and widened therapeutic index.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge the contributions of Drs. Jim Sullivan and Michael Williams to these studies and the fine technical assistance of Ms. Becky Olarte. We also thank Sue Heine for her assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication December 29, 1997.
Received for publication September 9, 1997.
1 This work was supported in part by National Institute for Mental Health Grant RO1-MH56247-01 and by Abbott Laboratories.
Send reprint requests to: Robert H. Lenox, M.D., Department of Psychiatry, Box 100256, JHM Health Science Center, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0256.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
CMP-PA, cytidine monophosphate-phosphatidic acid; DAG, diacylglycerol; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; IMPase, myo-inositol-1-monophosphatase; IP, inositol phosphate; MARCKS, myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate; PI, phosphoinositide; PKC, protein kinase C; VPA, valproate (sodium salt); 2-PGA, 2-propylglutaric acid; HVPA, hydroxyvalproic acid.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
in vitro.
J Neurochem
63:
2361-2364[Medline].
-adrenergic receptors, G-proteins, and adenylyl cyclase in rat C6 glioma cells.
Neuropsychopharmacology
15:
271-280[Medline].
isozyme.
J Neurochem
61:
2303-2310[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Fisher and W. Broderick Sodium valproate or valproate semisodium: is there a difference in the treatment of bipolar disorder? Psychiatr. Bull., December 1, 2003; 27(12): 446 - 448. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. MANJI, G. J. MOORE, and G. CHEN Bipolar disorder: leads from the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of mood stabilisers The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 178 (41): s107 - s119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chen, K. A. Hasanat, J. M. Bebchuk, G. J. Moore, D. Glitz, and H. K. Manji Regulation of Signal Transduction Pathways and Gene Expression by Mood Stabilizers and Antidepressants Psychosom Med, September 1, 1999; 61(5): 599 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. McNamara, D. J. Stumpo, L. M. Morel, M. H. Lewis, E. K. Wakeland, P. J. Blackshear, and R. H. Lenox Effect of reduced myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate expression on hippocampal mossy fiber development and spatial learning in mutant mice: Transgenic rescue and interactions with gene background PNAS, November 24, 1998; 95(24): 14517 - 14522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||