JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krasowski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krasowski, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, N. L.

Vol. 284, Issue 3, 934-942, March 1998

Trichloroethanol Modulation of Recombinant GABAA, Glycine and GABA rho 1 Receptors1

Matthew D. Krasowski, Suzanne E. Finn, Qing Ye and Neil L. Harrison

Departments of Anesthesia and Critical Care (S.E.F., Q.Y., N.L.H.) and Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences (N.L.H.) and Committee on Neurobiology (M.D.K.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The actions of 2,2,2,-trichloroethanol were studied on agonist-activated Cl- currents in gamma -aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA), glycine and GABA rho 1 receptors by use of the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Recombinant wild-type and mutant receptor subunits were transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Trichloroethanol enhanced currents elicited by submaximal (EC20) agonist concentrations at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors and glycine alpha 1 homomeric receptors in a reversible, concentration-dependent manner. Trichloroethanol, at concentrations of <= 2 mM, did not significantly alter the magnitude of submaximal GABA currents at GABA rho 1 receptors, whereas higher concentrations inhibited submaximal GABA currents. Recent work has identified residues within putative transmembrane domains 2 and 3 as critical for positive modulation of GABAA and glycine receptors by n-alkanols and volatile ether anesthetics. Submaximal glycine currents at receptors containing either of two specific mutations within the glycine receptor alpha 1 subunit (S267I and A288W) were not enhanced by low concentrations of trichloroethanol and were inhibited by higher concentrations of trichloroethanol. In the GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptor, a specific mutation within transmembrane domain 3 of the beta 1 subunit (M286W) also abolished positive modulation by trichloroethanol. Mutations within the GABAA alpha 2 receptor subunit did not alter positive modulation by TCEt, whereas such mutations ablate positive modulation by n-alkanols and volatile anesthetics. In summary, trichloroethanol modulation of GABAA, glycine and GABA rho 1 receptors shares some, but not all, features in common with the requirements for modulation by n-alkanols and volatile anesthetics.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

GABAA and glycine receptors are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the vertebrate nervous system. Both of these inhibitory receptors are positively modulated by clinical concentrations of a wide range of chemically diverse general anesthetics and sedative/hypnotics (Franks and Lieb, 1994; Zimmerman et al., 1994; Harris et al., 1995; Whiting et al., 1995). General anesthetics and sedative/hypnotics known to potentiate the actions of GABA at GABAA receptors include barbiturates (Study and Barker, 1981), propofol (Hales and Lambert, 1991), steroid anesthetics (Harrison and Simmonds, 1984; Harrison et al., 1987; Peters et al., 1988), etomidate (Uchida et al., 1995), n-alkanols (Nakahiro et al., 1991; Aguayo and Pancetti, 1994; Dildy-Mayfield et al., 1996) and halogenated volatile ether anesthetics (Nakahiro et al., 1989; Wakamori et al., 1991; Jones et al., 1992). Glycine receptors are positively modulated by clinical concentrations of volatile anesthetics (Harrison et al., 1993; Downie et al., 1996) and n-alkanols (Mascia et al., 1996a; Mascia et al., 1996b) but are much less sensitive to barbiturates (Koltchine et al., 1996; Mascia et al., 1996a), propofol and etomidate (Mascia et al., 1996a).

GABAA and glycine receptors are both members of a ligand-gated ion channel superfamily that also includes the serotonin3, GABA rho  (GABAC) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Betz, 1992; Unwin, 1993; Ortells and Lunt, 1995). Similar to GABAA and glycine receptors, some general anesthetics have potent actions on serotonin3 receptors (Jenkins et al., 1996) and on neuronal, but not muscle, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Flood et al., 1997; Violet et al., 1997).

The GABAA receptor is a heteromeric complex assembled from different glycoprotein subunits (alpha 1-6, beta 1-4, gamma 1-4, delta , epsilon ) that combine to form a chloride channel (reviewed by Macdonald and Olsen, 1994; Whiting et al., 1995). GABAA receptors in vivo probably consist mostly of pentameric complexes of alpha , beta  and gamma subunits with a stoichiometry of alpha alpha beta beta gamma (Chang et al., 1996), although receptors lacking the gamma  subunit (alpha beta receptors) can be expressed and are fully sensitive to general anesthetics and n-alkanols (Levitan et al., 1988; Pritchett et al., 1989; Harrison et al., 1993; Mihic et al., 1994). Native glycine receptors consist of two different subunits (alpha  and beta ), which assemble in vivo with a proposed stoichiometry of 3alpha :2beta (Langosch et al., 1988; Betz, 1991). Glycine alpha  subunits, which contain the glycine agonist and strychnine binding sites (Vandenberg et al., 1992), can form functional homomeric complexes in heterologous expression systems that are sensitive to strychnine, general anesthetics and n-alkanols (Sontheimer et al., 1989; Harrison et al., 1993; Taleb and Betz, 1994; Mascia et al., 1996a).

To date, three GABA rho  subunits have been cloned (rho 1-3), each showing approx 30% sequence homology with the GABAA receptor subunits (Cutting et al., 1991, 1992; Ogurusu and Shingai, 1996). In contrast to GABAA receptors, GABAC receptors assembled from rho  subunits are insensitive to benzodiazepines, barbiturates (Shimada et al., 1992) and steroid anesthetics (Feigenspan et al., 1993). n-Alkanols strongly inhibit the currents produced by low concentrations of GABA at the rho 1 receptor (Mihic and Harris, 1996).

The dissimilar pharmacology of the GABA rho  receptor to general anesthetics and sedative/hypnotics can be exploited to identify sites of modulator interaction. Recently, Mihic et al. (1997) identified amino acid residues within TM2 and TM3 of the GABAA and glycine receptors crucial for modulation by n-alkanols and by the halogenated volatile ether anesthetic enflurane (see fig. 3). We hypothesized that modulation of GABAA and glycine receptors by other compounds also might depend on the same residues. A sedative/hypnotic structurally related to the n-alkanols is TCEt, the principal active metabolite of chloral hydrate (Breimer, 1977; Hobbs et al., 1996). TCEt enhances the actions of GABA in hippocampal neurons (Lovinger et al., 1993; Peoples and Weight, 1994) and in recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in stably transfected fibroblast cell lines (Krasowski et al., 1997) .

To study the molecular mechanism of the potentiating action of TCEt, we investigated the effects of TCEt on wild-type GABAA, glycine and GABA rho  subunits transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells. The experiments with mutated GABAA and glycine receptors were performed to test whether the specific amino acid residues within TM2 and TM3 known to be critical for positive modulation by volatile anesthetics and n-alkanols are also necessary for positive modulation by TCEt.

    Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Site-directed mutagenesis. The amino acid sequence alignment of TM2 and TM3 from human GABAA alpha 2 (Hadingham et al., 1993a), beta 1 (Hadingham et al., 1993b), GABA rho 1 (Cutting et al., 1991) and glycine alpha 1 (Grenningloh et al., 1987) receptor subunits is shown (see fig. 3). The S270I, S270H and A291W mutations of the GABAA alpha 2 subunit, the M286W mutation of the GABAA beta 1 subunit and the S267I and A288W mutations of the glycine alpha 1 subunit were introduced by the unique site elimination method (Deng and Nickoloff, 1992) using the USE kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The method uses a two-primer system, in which one oligonucleotide primer encodes the desired mutation and the other alternates a unique SspI restriction site on the pCIS2 plasmid to an MluI site. The mutagenic reaction mixtures were digested with SspI restriction endonuclease to eliminate the parental template. Positive clones then were screened for the appearance of the MluI site, which were further confirmed by double-stranded sequencing (Sequenase 2.0; United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). Both MluI and SspI restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). The sequences and locations of the mutagenic primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA) are GABAA alpha 2(S270I), 5'-GACAACTCTAATCATCAGTGCTCGGAATTC-3', corresponding to bases 879-908 of the alpha 2 cDNA sequence; GABAA alpha 2(S270H), 5'-GACAACTCTACACATCAGTGCTCGGAATTC-3', corresponding to bases 879-908 of the alpha 2 cDNA sequence; GABAA alpha 2(A291W), 5'-CATGGACTGGTTTATTTGGGTTTGTTATGCATTTG-3', corresponding to bases 936-970 of the alpha 2 cDNA sequence; GABAA beta 1(M286W), 5'-GATTGATATTTATCTGTGGGGTTGCTTTGTG-3', corresponding to bases 915-945 of the beta 1 cDNA sequence; glycine alpha 1(S267I), 5'-CATGACCACCCAGATCTCCGGCTCTCGAG-3', corresponding to bases 870-898 of the glycine alpha 1 cDNA; and glycine alpha 1(A288W), 5'-CATTTGGATGTGGGTTTGCCTGCTCTTTGTG-3', corresponding to bases 936-966 of the glycine alpha 1 cDNA.

The S265I mutation in the beta 1 subunit was introduced with the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit, which is a Pfu-based polymerase chain reaction method (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The method takes advantage of the fact that DNA isolated from most strains of Escherichia coli is dam methylated and therefore susceptible to DpnI endonuclease digestion (target sequence, 5'-Gm6ATC-3'). The polymerase chain reaction product was digested with DpnI (Stratagene) to eliminate the parental template and transformed into XL-1 Blue cells (Stratagene). Positive clones were confirmed by double-stranded sequencing as described above.

Cell culture and transfection. Wild-type or mutant receptor cDNAs were expressed via the vector pCIS2, which contains one copy of the strong promoter from cytomegalovirus and a polyadenylation sequence from SV40. HEK 293 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were maintained in culture and passaged weekly by trypsin treatment for a maximum of 20 times before being discarded and replaced with early passage cells. HEK 293 cells were maintained in Eagle's minimum essential medium (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), L-glutamine (0.292 µg/ml; GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY), penicillin G sulfate (100 units/ml; GIBCO BRL) and streptomycin sulfate (100 µg/ml; GIBCO BRL). For electrophysiological experiments, cells were plated onto glass coverslips coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma). Each coverslip of cells was transfected according to the calcium phosphate precipitation technique as described previously (Okayama and Chen, 1987; Harrison et al., 1993). Each transfection required 1-5 µg of each cDNA; the cDNA was in contact with the cells for 24 hr under an atmosphere containing 3% CO2 before being removed and replaced with fresh culture medium in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

Electrophysiology. Electrophysiological recordings were performed at room temperature using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique as described previously (Harrison et al., 1993; Krasowski et al., 1997). The coverslips were transferred 24-96 hr after removal of the cDNA to a large chamber that was continuously perfused (2-3 ml/min) with extracellular medium containing (in mM): 145 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 5.5 D-glucose and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4, osmolarity 320-330 mOsM. The electrode solution contained (in mM): 145 N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride, 5 K2ATP, 5 HEPES/KOH, 2 MgCl2, 0.1 CaCl2 and 1.1 EGTA, pH 7.2, osmolarity 315 mOsM. Pipette-to-bath resistance was 4-6 MOmega . Cells were voltage-clamped at -60 mV. Because the intracellular and extracellular solutions contained symmetrical chloride concentrations, the chloride equilibrium potential was approx 0 mV.

All drugs were rapidly applied to the cell through local perfusion (Koltchine et al., 1996) using a motor-driven solution-exchange device (Bio Logic Rapid Solution Changer RSC-100; Molecular Kinetics, Pullman, WA). Laminar flow was maintained by applying all solutions at identical flow rates via a multichannel infusion pump (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL). The solution changer was driven by protocols in the acquisition program pCLAMP5 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Responses were low-pass-filtered at 5 kHz and digitized (TL-1-125 interface; Axon Instruments) using pCLAMP5 and stored for off-line analysis.

Throughout this study, modulation by TCEt was always assessed on agonist concentrations that are EC20 on the concentration-response curve for the given receptor. In this manner, the percent potentiation produced by coapplication of a modulator can be compared across different receptors and should not be influenced by differences in levels of receptor expression.

Data analysis. Drug-induced potentiation of an agonist-induced current was defined as the percentage increase of the control agonist response (defined as the average of the predrug and postdrug agonist-induced currents). Concentration-response data were fitted (KaleidaGraph; Synergy Software, Reading, PA) with the logistic equation: I/Imax = 100 * [drug]n/{[drug]n + (EC50 )n}, where I/Imax is the percentage of the maximum obtainable response, EC50 is the concentration producing a half-maximal response and n is the Hill coefficient (nH). Pooled data are presented throughout as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical significance was determined by Student's two-tailed, unpaired t test.

Drugs. Stock solutions of GABA, glycine, TCEt (all from Sigma) and picrotoxin (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA) were diluted into the extracellular solution daily before use.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Contrasting modulation of GABAA, glycine and rho 1 receptors by TCEt. The amplitudes of submaximal (EC20) GABA currents at wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors were significantly potentiated by coapplication with TCEt (0.1-10 mM; fig. 1A). In these and all other experiments with TCEt in this study, TCEt was preapplied to the cells before the coapplication of TCEt and agonist. This allowed the TCEt to be at equilibrium before GABA application and allowed for the monitoring of any direct action of TCEt (see below).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Contrasting effects of TCEt on wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1, glycine alpha 1 and GABA rho 1 receptors. A, TCEt potentiates submaximal GABA-induced currents in GABAA alpha 2 beta 1 receptors. B, TCEt inhibits submaximal GABA-induced currents in the GABA rho 1 receptor. C, TCEt potentiates submaximal glycine-induced currents in the wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptor. Traces shown in A, B and C are individual recordings from HEK 293 cells transfected with cDNAs encoding the indicated receptor subunit combination. D, Pooled concentration-response relationships for TCEt modulation of currents in response to submaximal (EC20) concentrations of agonist at wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1, glycine alpha 1 and GABA rho 1 receptors. Significant potentiation of submaximal GABA responses at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors occurs at all TCEt concentrations of >= 0.1 mM TCEt (P < .05 for each concentration >= 0 .1 mM; 5 <= n <=  11). TCEt potentiates submaximal GABA currents in GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors with an EC50 value of 0.38 ± 0.03 mM and a Hill slope of 1.6 ± 0.2. Significant inhibition of submaximal GABA currents at GABA rho 1 receptors occurs at 5 and 10 mM TCEt (P < .05 for both concentrations);at concentrations below 5 mM, TCEt had no effect on submaximal GABA currents at rho 1 receptors (4 <=  n <=  7). Significant enhancement of submaximal glycine responses at wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors occurs at all TCEt concentrations >= 1 mM (P < .05 for each concentration >= 1 mM; 7 <=  n <=  12). The EC50 values and Hill slopes for TCEt potentiation of glycine alpha 1 receptors are 1.0 ± 0.1 mM and 3.2 ± 1.4, respectively. The effect of TCEt at GABA rho 1 receptors was significantly different from that at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors at all TCEt concentrations of >= 0.1 mM (P < .05 for each concentration >= 0 .1 mM) and different from that at glycine alpha 1 receptors at all TCEt concentrations of >= 2 mM (P < .05 for each concentration >= 2 mM). Error bars indicate mean ± S.E.M. of data from multiple experiments.

In contrast, the amplitudes of EC20 GABA currents elicited at rho 1 receptors were unaffected by low concentrations of TCEt (<= 2 mM) but were inhibited by higher concentrations of TCEt (5 and 10 mM; fig. 1B). In addition to the inhibition of the current amplitude, the coapplication of TCEt caused a change in the shape of submaximal GABA currents. The submaximal GABA currents depicted in figure 1B show the characteristic slow activation and deactivation kinetics of GABA currents at rho 1 receptors with little desensitization (Amin and Weiss, 1996). An EC20 application of GABA (1 µM) at rho 1 receptors results in no apparent desensitization even when applied for several minutes (data not shown). However, the coapplication of TCEt resulted in GABA currents that activated more quickly and appeared to desensitize.

The amplitudes of submaximal (EC20) glycine currents at wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors were significantly potentiated by coapplication with TCEt (1-10 mM; fig. 1C). Figure 1D summarizes the effects of TCEt on agonist-induced currents at wild-type GABAA, glycine and rho 1 receptors. The efficacy of TCEt (i.e., maximal potentiation of EC20 agonist currents) was several-fold less at glycine alpha 1 receptors than at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors (fig. 1D).

Effect of coapplication of TCEt on agonist concentration-response relationships. The coapplication of TCEt (5 mM) caused parallel leftward shifts in the agonist concentration-response curves for GABAA alpha 2beta 1 and glycine alpha 1 receptors (fig. 2, A and B). In contrast, the coapplication of TCEt resulted in a parallel rightshift in the GABA concentration-response curve for the GABA rho 1 receptor (fig. 2C). TCEt did not significantly alter the Hill slope or maximal current response (Emax) to agonist in any of the three wild-type receptors studied.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Concentration-response relationships for wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1, glycine alpha 1 and GABA rho 1 receptors in the presence and absence of TCEt. A, Coapplication of TCEt (5 mM) shifts the GABA concentration-response curve of wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors to the left (4 <=  n <=  9 for all data points). EC50 and Hill slope values determined from the curve fits are GABAA alpha 2beta 1 wild-type in absence (EC50 = 9.8 ± 0.6 µM, nH = 2.3 ± 0.4) and presence of 5 mM TCEt (EC50 = 1.1 ± 0.05 µM, nH = 2.9 ± 0.3). TCEt did not alter the maximal current response (Emax) to GABA at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors. B, Coapplication of TCEt (5 mM) shifts the glycine concentration-response curve of wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors to the left, although the shift is less than that at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors (5 <=  n <=  10 for all data points). EC50 and Hill slope values determined from the curve fits are glycine alpha 1 wild-type receptors in absence (EC50 = 46.3 ± 2.5 µM, nH = 1.7 ± 0.1) and presence of 5 mM TCEt (EC50 = 11.7 ± 0.5 µM, nH = 1.8 ± 0.1). TCEt did not alter the Emax to glycine at glycine alpha 1 receptors. C, Coapplication of TCEt (5 mM) shifts the GABA concentration-response curve of wild-type GABA rho 1 receptors to the right (5 <=  n <=  7 for all data points). EC50 and Hill slope values determined from the curve fits are GABA rho 1 wild-type receptors in absence (EC50 = 3.9 ± 0.3 µM, nH = 1.5 ± 0.2) and presence of 5 mM TCEt (EC50 = 13.7 ± 2.2 µM, nH = 1.1 ± 0.2). TCEt did not alter the Emax to GABA at rho 1 receptors.

Concentration-response and receptor characteristics for wild-type and mutant receptors analyzed in this study. Previous work by Mihic et al. (1997) demonstrates that specific mutations at two specific residues, one each within TM2 and TM3 (fig. 3), dramatically reduce or abolish the sensitivity to n-alkanols and enflurane of GABAA and glycine receptors expressed in either HEK 293 cells or Xenopus laevis oocytes. After transient expression in HEK 293 cells, all of the GABAA wild-type and mutant receptors studied here produced inward currents in approx 30% of cells tested in response to the application of GABA. There have been recent reports of endogenous GABAA subunit activity in HEK 293 cells (Ueno et al., 1996). Our experience with HEK 293 cells to date does not concur with this finding. In fact, similar to results from other laboratories (Davies et al., 1997), we do not observe significant GABAA receptor-mediated currents in untransfected HEK 293 cells or in cells transfected with either GABAA alpha  or beta subunit cDNAs alone (Koltchine et al., 1996).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Amino acid sequence alignment of TM2 and TM3 from human glycine alpha 1, GABAA alpha 2, beta 1 and GABA rho 1 receptor subunits. Residue positions in bold type within TM2 and TM3 of glycine alpha 1 subunits (S267 and A288), GABAA alpha 2 (residues S270 and A291) and GABAA beta 1 subunits (S265 and M286) were investigated in the present study of TCEt.

GABA concentration-response curves for GABAA receptors that contain either mutated alpha 2 or beta 1 subunits demonstrate that all the mutant receptors tested in this study have GABA concentration-response relationships that are similar to those of wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors. EC50 and Hill slope values determined from the curve fits are (4 <=  n <=  9 for all data points) alpha 2beta 1 wild-type (EC50 = 9.8 ± 0.6 µM, nH = 2.3 ± 0.4), alpha 2(S270I)beta 1 (EC50 = 14.4 ± 0.5 µM, nH = 2.4 ± 0.1), alpha 2(S270H)beta 1 (EC50 = 3.4 ± 0.2 µM, nH = 1.4 ± 0.1), alpha 2(A291W)beta 1 (EC50 = 2.4 ± 0.1 µM, nH = 1.7 ± 0.2), alpha 2beta 1(S265I) (EC50 = 37.5 ± 8.5 µM, nH = 1.2 ± 0.2) and alpha 2beta 1(M286W) (EC50 = 7.4 ± 1.8 µM, nH = 0.8 ± 0.2). The EC50 values for the mutant receptors do not differ by >4.1-fold from those for wild-type. Interestingly, the Hill slopes for the GABA concentration-response relationships for the alpha 2beta 1(S265I) and alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptors are significantly lower compared with wild-type alpha 2beta 1 receptors (P < .001 and P < .05, respectively). Maximal current response to GABA of all GABAA mutant receptors did not differ by >1.5-fold from wild-type: alpha 2beta 1 wild-type (608 ± 59 pA, n = 43), alpha 2(S270I)beta 1 (489 ± 33 pA, n = 40), alpha 2(S270H)beta 1 (598 ± 62 pA, n = 42), alpha 2(A291W)beta 1 (935 ± 123 pA, n = 29), alpha 2beta 1(S265I) (709 ± 97 pA, n = 43) and alpha 2beta 1(M286W) (422 ± 54 pA, n = 42).

HEK 293 cells transfected with rho 1 receptor cDNA also yielded significant currents in response to GABA. Significant GABA currents in HEK 293 cells transfected with rho 1 receptor cDNA required the cells to be maintained in tissue culture for 5-7 days after calcium phosphate transfection; this is longer than the 2-4 days necessary for expression of GABAA and glycine receptors. GABA activates rho 1 receptors with an EC50 value of 3.9 ± 0.3 µM and a Hill slope of 1.5 ± 0.2 (n = 7 for all data points). Maximal response to GABA for rho 1 receptors was 700 ± 134 pA (n = 42).

HEK 293 cells transfected with cDNAs corresponding to glycine alpha 1 wild-type receptors and the glycine alpha 1 receptor mutants alpha 1(S267I) and alpha 1(A288W) also yielded significant currents in response to the application of glycine. The concentration-response curve for the glycine alpha 1(A288W) mutant receptor is shifted to the right relative to that for the wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptor by 4-fold. EC50 values and Hill slopes for wild-type and mutant glycine receptors are (5 <=  n <= 10 for all data points) wild-type glycine alpha 1 (EC50 = 46.3 ± 2.5 µM, nH = 1.7 ± 0.1), alpha 1(S267I) (EC50 = 71.9 ± 1.3 µM, nH = 1.3 ± 0.1) and alpha 1(A288W) (EC50 = 187 ± 9.9 µM, nH = 1.2 ± 0.1).

Maximal responses to glycine for the glycine receptors were wild-type alpha 1 (649 ± 70 pA, n = 63), alpha 1(S267I) (881 ± 151 pA, n = 28) and alpha 1(A288W) (263 ± 33 pA, n = 14). The maximal response to glycine of the alpha 1(A288W) receptor (mutation in TM3) was 2.5-fold less than that at wild-type alpha 1 receptors. The glycine alpha 1(A288W) mutant receptor expressed in X. laevis oocytes has also been noted to be tonically open in the absence of glycine (Mihic et al., 1997). In our experiments in HEK 293 cells, the application of 100 µM picrotoxin produced outward currents whose amplitude was approx 5-10% of the maximal amplitude of the inward currents in response to application of 10 mM glycine (data not shown).

Mutations within TM2 or TM3 of the glycine alpha 1 receptor abolish potentiation by low concentrations of TCEt and result in inhibition by high concentrations of TCEt. EC20 glycine currents elicited at the glycine alpha 1(S267I) receptor were unaffected by low concentrations of TCEt (<= 2 mM) but inhibited by higher concentrations of TCEt (5 and 10 mM; fig. 4A) in a fashion similar to that seen at the GABA rho 1 receptor. In contrast to the effects of TCEt at rho 1 receptor-mediated currents, the coapplication of TCEt did not appear qualitatively to alter the kinetics of submaximal glycine currents at either the wild-type glycine alpha 1 or the S267I and A288W mutant receptors. Concentration-response curves for TCEt modulation of submaximal glycine currents at glycine alpha 1(S267I) and alpha 1(A288W) receptors differ markedly from that of wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors (fig. 4B) and instead appear to be very similar to the actions of TCEt at GABA rho 1 receptors.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Mutations in either TM2 or TM3 of the glycine alpha 1 receptor abolish positive modulation by TCEt. A, TCEt at high concentrations inhibits submaximal glycine-induced currents in the glycine alpha 1(S267I) mutant receptor. Recordings shown are from an HEK 293 cell transfected with cDNAs encoding the glycine alpha 1(S267I) mutant receptor. B, Concentration-response data for TCEt modulation of submaximal glycine currents at glycine alpha 1 receptor mutants alpha 1(S267I) and alpha 1(A288W) are shown with the TCEt modulation curve for the wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptor included for comparison. Coapplication of TCEt has a significant inhibitory effect on submaximal glycine currents in the alpha 1(S267I) mutant receptor at TCEt concentrations of 5 and 10 mM (P < 0.05 for both concentrations; 4 <=  n <=  7). TCEt concentrations of >= 2 mM have inhibitory effects on the glycine alpha 1(A288W) mutant receptor (P < 0.05 for all concentrations >= 2 mM; 4 <= n <=  7). The magnitude of potentiation by TCEt was significantly lower than that at wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors at all TCEt concentrations of >= 2 mM for the glycine alpha 1(S267I) mutant receptors (P < 0.01 for all concentrations >= 2 mM) and at all TCEt concentrations of >= 1 mM for the glycine alpha 1(A288W) mutant receptor (P < 0.01 for each concentration >= 1 mM).

A point mutation within TM3 of the beta 1 subunit of the GABAA receptor ablates potentiation by TCEt. Most of the GABAA receptor mutants analyzed in this study exhibited normal potentiation by 5 mM TCEt (fig. 5A). Submaximal GABA currents at one mutant receptor, alpha 2beta 1(M286W), however, showed no enhancement by 5 mM TCEt (fig. 5A). At a TCEt concentration of 10 mM, inhibition of the GABA response was seen (fig. 5B).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A mutation in TM3 of the GABAA beta 1 subunit ablates positive modulation by TCEt. A, Summary of the effects of mutations in TM2 and TM3 of GABAA receptor alpha 2 and beta 1 subunits on potentiation by TCEt. The ordinate depicts percentage change of an EC20 test concentration of GABA by coapplication with TCEt (where 0% = no potentiation). TCEt (5 mM) significantly enhances EC20 GABA applications for all receptors (P < 0.05 for each receptor) except the alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptor. Potentiation at the alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptor by TCEt is significantly less than that at the wild-type alpha 2beta 1 receptor (P < 0.01). Potentiation of all other mutant receptors does not differ from that of the wild-type alpha 2beta 1 receptor. Numbers in parentheses above bars indicate number of experiments contributing to mean values. B, Concentration-response data are illustrated for TCEt modulation of submaximal GABA currents at the GABAA alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptor with TCEt modulation curves for wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1 and GABA rho 1 receptors included for comparison. Coapplication of TCEt has no significant effect on submaximal GABA currents in alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptors at all TCEt concentrations of <= 5 mM; 10 mM TCEt, however, has an inhibitory effect (P < 0.05; 4 <=  n <=  6 for all points). The magnitude of potentiation by TCEt at GABAA alpha 2beta 1(M286W) mutant receptors was significantly lower than that at wild-type GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors at all TCEt concentrations of >= 0.2 mM (P < 0.05 for each concentration >= 2 mM). TCEt modulation of GABAA alpha 2beta 1(M286W) receptors differed from that at the rho 1 receptor only at 5 mM TCEt (P < 0.05 for 5 mM only).

Direct actions of TCEt. Although TCEt in the absence of applied agonist has been reported to produce small GABAA receptor-mediated currents in neuronal GABAA receptors (Peoples and Weight, 1994), no direct gating effects were evident in our experiments on recombinant GABAA alpha 2beta 1, glycine alpha 1 and GABA rho 1 receptors at TCEt concentrations up to 10 mM.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

As described for the barbiturates (Levitan et al., 1988; Pritchett et al., 1989), halogenated volatile ether anesthetics (Harrison et al., 1993) and propofol (Jones et al., 1995), modulation of GABAA receptors by TCEt does not require the presence of the gamma subunit. The efficacy and apparent affinity of TCEt in enhancing the function of GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors in this study are comparable with those observed for TCEt at neuronal GABAA receptors (Peoples and Weight, 1994) and at GABAA alpha 1beta 3gamma 2 receptors stably expressed in mouse fibroblasts (Krasowski et al., 1997).

The concentrations of TCEt that caused potentiation of GABAA alpha 2beta 1 and glycine alpha 1 receptor-mediated currents in this study correspond well with anesthetic concentration ranges determined in vivo. TCEt anesthetizes dogs and humans at concentrations in the range of 0.2-5 mM (Garrett and Lambert, 1973; Breimer, 1977; Owen and Taberner, 1980; Hobbs et al., 1996). As in previous studies of TCEt modulation of GABAA receptors (Peoples and Weight, 1994; Krasowski et al., 1997), the estimated EC50 values for TCEt potentiation of GABAA alpha 2beta 1 and glycine alpha 1 receptor-mediated currents are within the anesthetic concentration range. These data are consistent with the notion that enhancement of GABAA and/or glycine receptor function may contribute to the hypnotic/anesthetic effects of TCEt.

The dissimilar anesthetic pharmacology of GABAA, glycine and GABA rho  receptors has been used to identify receptor domains critical for drug modulation. Recently, Mihic et al. (1997) used glycine alpha 1/GABA rho 1 receptor chimeras to identify a 45-residue domain within the glycine alpha 1 receptor subunit as being necessary for positive modulation by n-alkanols and volatile anesthetics. This led to the identification of amino acid residues in TM2 and TM3 that appear to be necessary to confer positive modulation of GABAA and glycine receptors by n-alkanols and the volatile anesthetic enflurane.

As reported for the n-alkanols, TCEt enhances submaximal agonist currents at GABAA and glycine receptors but inhibits submaximal GABA currents at the GABA rho 1 receptor (Mihic and Harris, 1996). In addition, the results of this study show that specific mutations within TM2 and/or TM3 of GABAA and glycine receptor subunits dramatically affect modulation of submaximal agonist responses by TCEt. Except for the GABAA alpha 2(S270H)beta 1 mutant receptor,2 all of the mutations in this study were the result of the replacement of a GABAA or glycine receptor subunit residue by the analogous residue in the GABA rho 1 receptor. Two specific mutations within either TM2 or TM3 of the glycine alpha 1 subunit ablated positive modulation by TCEt and resulted in inhibition by high concentrations of TCEt. In the GABAA receptor, a mutation in TM3 of the beta 1 subunit abolished positive modulation of submaximal GABA currents by all concentrations of TCEt studied and introduced inhibition at 10 mM TCEt. By contrast, mutation in either TM2 or TM3 of the GABA alpha 2 subunit eliminates ethanol and enflurane enhancement of GABA-induced currents at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 receptors (Mihic et al., 1997). Interestingly, the M286W mutation in TM3 of the GABAAbeta 1 subunit also ablates potentiation of submaximal GABA currents by propofol at GABAA alpha 2beta 1 and alpha 2beta 1gamma 2S receptors. In fact, similar to TCEt, positive modulation by propofol is affected only by the beta 1(M286W) mutation and not by mutations in the alpha 2 subunit or by mutation in TM2 of the beta 1 subunit (Krasowski et al., in press).

The lack of effect of mutations within the GABAA alpha 2 subunit on positive modulation by TCEt demonstrates that the molecular substrate for positive modulation by TCEt is different from that for modulation by n-alkanols and volatile ether anesthetics. However, these anesthetics have common requirements for specific residues within TM2 and TM3 for the positive modulation of GABAA and glycine receptors. In future experiments, we will attempt to delineate additional amino acids that play a role in positive modulation of GABAA and glycine receptors by these anesthetics.

    Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. C. E. Rick for careful reading of the manuscript and A. Kung, L. Brady and M. Ruan for technical assistance.

    Note Added in Proof

Very recently, another study has demonstrated that trichloroethanol positively modulates wild-type glycine alpha 1 receptors in a manner similar to that shown in the present manuscript (Pistis M, Belelli D, Peters JA and Lambert JJ (1997) The interaction of general anaesthetics with recombinant GABAA and glycine receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes: A comparative study. Br J Pharmacol 122:1707-1719).

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 17, 1997.

Received for publication August 19, 1997.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM45129, GM00623 and GM56850 (N.L.H.) and a training grant from National Institute of Mental Health (M.D.K.).

2 The GABAA alpha 2(S270H)beta 1 mutant receptor was also studied because it is insensitive to positive modulation by ethanol, enflurane (Mihic et al., 1997) and isoflurane (Krasowski et al., in press).

Send reprint requests to: Matthew D. Krasowski, University of Chicago, Whitman Laboratory, 915 East 57th Street, Room 202, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: kra3{at}harper.uchicago.edu

    Abbreviations

GABAA, gamma -aminobutyric acid type A; HEK, human embryonic kidney; TM, transmembrane domain; EGTA, ethylene glycol bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References