![]() |
|
|
Vol. 284, Issue 3, 1082-1094, March 1998
CNS Research, Troponwerke GmbH & Co. KG, Neurather Ring 1, D-51063 Cologne, FRG
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aminomethylchroman derivative BAY × 3702 (R-(
)-2-{4-[(chroman-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-butyl}-1,1-dioxo-benzo[d]isothiazolone hydrochloride) is a new high affinity 5-hydroxytryptamine
(5-HT)1A receptor ligand [calf hippocampus:
Ki: 0.19 nM; reference compounds
8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and
ipsapirone: 0.98 and 2.56, respectively; rat cortex: 0.24 nM; rat
hippocampus: 0.58 nM; human cortex and recombinant 5-HT1A receptors: 0.25 and 0.4 nM, respectively]. BAY × 3702 bound also with relatively high to moderate affinity to the following receptors: alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenergic
(Ki: 6 and 7 nM, respectively); 5-HT7
and 5-HT1D (7 and 36 nM);
dopamine D2
and D4 (48 and 91 nM); sigma sites (176 nM) and 5-HT2C (310 nM); others: >10
µM, as obtained in more than 50 different binding assays. In the
forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase assay in rat hippocampal tissue,
a model of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor function, BAY × 3702 was a potent 5-HT1A receptor full
agonist (IC50: 1.9 nM; 8-OH-DPAT: 25.3 nM, full agonist;
ipsapirone: partial agonist) and its effects could be completely
blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist
N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexane carboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635). At those receptors where
BAY × 3702 bound with lower affinity, the compound appeared to be
either an agonist (5-HT1D receptors) or an antagonist
(alpha-1, alpha-2 and D2 receptors).
In a rat brain slice preparation containing the dorsal raphe nucleus
(DRN), a model of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptor function,
BAY × 3702 inhibited potently (1 nM) neuronal firing. Also
in vivo, BAY × 3702 (0.5 µg/kg, i.v.) was found to suppress 5-HT neuronal firing in the DRN of anesthetized rats. In both
electrophysiological assays BAY × 3702 was more potent than
8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone; the potency difference being about 1 and 2 orders of magnitude, respectively. In rats trained to discriminate
8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) in a drug discrimination procedure,
complete generalization was obtained with BAY × 3702 (ED50: 0.022 mg/kg, i.p. and 0.38 mg/kg, p.o.; 8-OH-DPAT:
0.028 mg/kg, i.p. and ipsapirone: 0.44 mg/kg, i.p.). In the rat
hypothermia model BAY × 3702 induced a WAY-100635-reversible
effect and the compound had a higher potency and intrinsic activity
than 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone (ED50: 0.25 mg/kg, i.p. and
5.4 mg/kg, p.o., respectively; 8-OH-DPAT: 1.1 mg/kg, i.p. and
ipsapirone: 6.2 mg/kg, i.p.). BAY × 3702 induced a stimulation of
plasma ACTH levels in the rat; the effect being again more pronounced
than that of ipsapirone (ED50: 7.5 and 25.3 mg/kg, p.o.,
respectively). It is concluded that BAY × 3702 is a relatively
selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist with high potency and
intrinsic activity.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During
the last 15 yr, considerable evidence has accumulated which suggests
that 5-HT1A receptor ligands may have a broad spectrum of
therapeutic benefits (for reviews, see De Vry, 1995
; Ennis, 1993
).
Initial clinical experience was collected with the pyrimidinylpiperazine derivatives buspirone, ipsapirone, gepirone and
tandospirone, and indicated that such compounds have mixed anxiolytic/antidepressive properties (De Vry et al., 1991
,
1992
; Pecknold, 1994
; Stahl et al., 1992
; Traber and Glaser,
1987
). However, in addition to therapeutic applications in the field of
psychiatry, more recent preclinical studies have suggested that
5-HT1A receptor agonists have also pronounced
neuroprotective properties, and thus may have additional potential in
the field of neurology (e.g., Bielenberg and Burkhardt,
1990
; Bode-Greuel et al., 1990
; Prehn et al.,
1991
; for additional references, see De Vry et al., 1997a
).
Studies aimed at elucidating the mechanism of action underlying the
therapeutic effects of 5-HT1A receptor ligands have
suggested that the level of intrinsic activity, as well as the relative efficacy of these compounds at different 5-HT1A receptor
populations determines their particular therapeutic profile (De Vry,
1995
). Typically, 5-HT1A receptor populations are
subdivided in presynaptic or somatodendritic receptors and postsynaptic
receptors, and the pyrimidinylpiperazine derivatives have been
characterized as full agonists at the former receptor population, and
partial agonists or antagonists at the latter receptor populations (for
reviews, see Glaser et al., 1991
; Glaser and De Vry, 1992
).
Therefore, the pyrimidinylpiperazine derivatives have been referred to
as being mixed agonist/antagonists, or partial agonists at
5-HT1A receptors. The level of intrinsic activity of the
pyrimidinyl piperazines appears to be situated between that of the
aminotetralin derivative 8-OH-DPAT (Arvidsson et al., 1981
),
which is generally considered as a 5-HT1A receptor full
agonist, and that of the "silent" antagonist WAY-100635 (Forster
et al., 1995
). Based on extensive preclinical studies, it
was hypothesized that the therapeutic spectrum of a 5-HT1A
receptor ligand could be optimized by increasing the apparent intrinsic
activity at pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor
populations (De Vry, 1995
, 1996
).
Besides the prototypical 8-OH-DPAT, a number of compounds with a level
of intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A receptors higher than that
of the pyrimidinylpiperazine derivatives have been described in recent
years. Among these are the aminotetralin derivative LY274601 (Foreman
et al., 1995
), the phenylpiperazine derivative flesinoxan
(Schipper et al., 1991
), the naphthylpiperazine derivative S
14671 (Millan et al., 1992
), the benzodioxan derivatives MDL 72832 (Mir et al., 1988
) and MKC-242 (Abe et al.,
1996
), the chroman derivative S 20499 (Kidd et al., 1993
),
and the tetrahydrobenzindole derivatives BAY r 1531 (Glaser et
al., 1987
), LY228729 (Foreman et al., 1993
), LY293284
(Foreman et al., 1994
) and U-92016A (McCall et
al., 1994
). However, several of these compounds have not been developed clinically due to inappropriate pharmacokinetics. Moreover, although the level of intrinsic activity at 5-HT1A
receptors appears to be higher than that of the pyrimidinylpiperazine
derivatives, it is likely that for some of these compounds the level is
still considerably less than that of 5-HT itself and therefore, such compounds should still be considered as partial agonists.
Recently, the novel aminomethylchroman derivative BAY × 3702 (fig. 1) was described as a high affinity
5-HT1A receptor agonist with pronounced neuroprotective
properties (De Vry et al., 1997a
, b
; Horváth and
Augstein, 1997
; Horváth et al., 1997
). We report on
the receptor binding profile of BAY × 3702 and describe the effects of the compound in a number of biochemical,
electrophysiological, behavioral and endocrinological models of
5-HT1A receptor function. Functional models included models
of somatodendritic receptor activation, such as 5-HT neuronal firing
activity in brain slices containing the DRN (Greuel and Glaser, 1992
;
Schechter et al., 1990
; VanderMaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
),
or recorded in vivo (Jolas et al., 1995
; Sprouse
and Aghajanian, 1987
; Sommermeyer et al., 1993b
) and
8-OH-DPAT drug discrimination (Glennon, 1986
; Schreiber and De Vry,
1993
; Schreiber et al., 1995
), and models of postsynaptic
receptor activity, such as the adenylate cyclase assay in hippocampal
membranes (De Vivo and Maayani, 1986
; De Vry et al., 1991
;
Hamon et al., 1988
) and stimulation of plasma ACTH levels
(Critchley et al., 1994
; Di Sciullo et al., 1990
; Gilbert et al., 1988
; Pan and Gilbert, 1992
); as well as
models that may reflect activation of multiple receptor populations, such as hypothermia (Glaser et al., 1991
; but, see Higgins
et al., 1988
; Hjorth, 1985
; Millan et al., 1993
;
for extensive discussion on models of pre- and postsynaptic function,
see De Vry et al., 1991
; Glaser et al., 1991
). In
general, effects of BAY × 3702 were compared with those induced
by the reference compounds 8-OH-DPAT (Arvidsson et al.,
1981
) and ipsapirone (Traber et al., 1984
), and involvement
of 5-HT1A receptors in the effect was ascertained by
antagonism experiments with WAY-100635 (Forster et al.,
1995
).
|
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals. Male Wistar rats weighing 150 to 250 g were obtained from Winkelmann (Borchen, FRG). Animals were group-housed (except in the case of drug discrimination, where they were individually housed) in standard Macrolon cages for at least 1 wk before the start of the experiments. Room temperature was maintained at 21.5 ± 1.5°C and lights were on from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.. A standard laboratory food diet and tap water were available ad libitum; except in the case of drug discrimination, where the rats were maintained at about 80% of their free-feeding weight by restricting their daily diet to 13 to 15 g. Experimental protocols and conditions were conform with the local regulations on animal welfare.
Receptor binding.
The methodologies used for measuring
binding to various neurotransmitter receptors are summarized in table
1. For membrane preparations fresh calf
brains from a local slaughterhouse trimmed free of blood vessels and
meninges and brains of decapitated Wistar rats were used; whereas human
cortex membranes were obtained from ABS (Analytical Biological Services
Inc., Wilmington, DE). Regions of interest were dissected out,
homogenized in 10 volumes of 0.32 M sucrose and centrifuged for 10 min
at 700 × g. The supernatant was centrifuged at
43,500 × g for 10 min and the pellet resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH: 7.7, 25°C) by a 10-sec polytron treatment. Aliquots
of the membrane preparations were stored at
140°C over liquid
nitrogen. To remove endogenous serotonin, brain membranes were
incubated at 37°C for 10 min before the experiment. Assays were
terminated by rapid filtration over Whatman GF/C filters using a
Brandel cell harvester. Ki values were
calculated according to the Cheng-Prusoff equation from the respective
IC50 values obtained from dose-response curves with at
least six concentrations. Those receptors for which no
Ki values are given were assayed at Panlabs
Inc., Bothell, WA.
|
5-HT1A- and 5-HT1D receptor coupled
adenylate cyclase assay in membranes.
5-HT1A- and
5-HT1D receptor coupled adenylate cyclase activity was
measured in rat hippocampal or calf substantia nigra membranes, respectively, according to the methods described by De Vivo and Maayani
(1986)
and Schoeffter et al. (1988)
. Hippocampi or
substantia nigra tissue were homogenized in 25 volumes of 0.3 M sucrose
containing (in mM) EGTA (1), EDTA (5), dithiothreitol (5) and Tris-HCl
(20), (pH: 7.4, 25°C) in a motor-driven Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 × g
and the supernatant was centrifuged at 39,000 × g for
10 min. The pellet was resuspended in homogenization buffer at a
protein concentration of about 1 mg/ml and aliquots were stored at
140°C. Before use the membranes were rehomogenized in a
Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. A total of 50 µl of the membrane
suspension was added to the incubation mixture containing (in mM) NaCl
(100), magnesium acetate (2), ATP (0.2), cAMP (1), GTP (0.01),
forskolin (0.01), Tris-HCl (80), creatine phosphate (5), 0.8 U/µl
creatine phosphokinase, IBMX (0.1), 1-2 µCi
-[32P]ATP, test compounds in various concentrations
and approximately 50 µg membrane protein. Incubations (10 min at
30°C) were started by adding the membrane solutions to the prewarmed
(5 min at 30°C) incubation mixtures. The formed
[32P]cAMP was determined according to Salomon (1979)
.
Protein was measured as described by Bradford (1976)
.
Dopamine D2- and alpha2-adrenergic
receptor-linked cAMP formation in cultured cell lines.
The mouse
fibroblast cell line LZR-1 expressing rat dopamine D2
receptors was obtained from Dr. O. Civelli; whereas
alpha2-adrenergic receptor containing NG108-15
neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells were obtained from Dr. B. Hamprecht. Cell culture and cAMP measurements were performed as
described (Sommermeyer et al., 1993a
; Traber et
al., 1975
). For measuring cAMP levels the cells were washed twice
with incubation buffer, containing (in mM) HEPES (20), NaCl (145), KCl
(5.4), CaCl (1.8), MgCl (1), glucose (20), pH: 7.4 and preincubated for
10 min at 37°C. After addition of effectors and test compounds cells
were incubated for 30 min. Incubations were terminated by removing the
incubation medium followed by addition of 0.5 ml ethanol (96% v/v).
Supernatants were transferred to test tubes, the ethanol was
evaporated, and the residues were dissolved in H2O.
Determination of cAMP was performed according to Gilman (1970)
using a
protein binding assay.
Alpha1-adrenergic receptor-linked phosphoinositide
breakdown.
Accumulation of InsPn was measured in the
presence of LiCl essentially as described by Sommermeyer et
al. (1990)
in cultured brain astrocytes. Cells were prelabeled
with 2 µCi/ml [3H]myo-inositol for 24 hr in serum-free
DMEM medium. One hour before incubation with noradrenaline and test
compounds LiCl in a final concentration of 10 mM was added. The 30-min
incubations were terminated by pouring 1.25 ml of ice-cold methanol
directly onto the cells. Cells were scraped off, added to 1.25 ml
chloroform containing tubes and kept over night at 4°C. The upper
phase was applied to AG-1X8 (Bio Rad, Munich, FRG) columns. The lower
chloroform-phase was washed once with 500 µl of the upper phase from
a mixture containing chloroform/methanol/100 mM sodium
cyclohexan-1,2-diamintetraacetate 16/8/5 (v/v/v). The collected upper
phases were applied to the corresponding columns. After washing with 10 ml 5 mM disodium tetraborate, 60 mM sodium formate total
InsPn were eluted with 6 ml of 100 mM formic acid, 1 mM
ammonium formate and radioactivity was determined by liquid
scintillation counting.
Alpha2-adrenergic receptor-regulated 5-HT release in
rat brain slices.
Superfusion experiments with rat
occipitoparietal cortex slices were performed according to Goethert
et al. (1981)
. Slices were incubated in Krebs-Ringer
solution containing 0.1 µM [3H]5-HT for 60 min,
transferred to superfusion chambers and superfused for 155 min at a
rate of 1.1 ml/min. The superfusates were collected in 5-min samples
from the 60th min on. At the end of the superfusion the slices were
solubilized with tissue solubilizer (Bilute S, Zinsser, FRG), and the
radioactivity in the slices and in the collected fraction was
determined. Each slice was electrically stimulated (20 mA, 2 msec, 3 Hz) for 2 min 70 (S1) and 115 min (S2) after
onset of the superfusion. Drugs were present throughout the superfusion
or were added 85 min after onset. Stimulation evoked
[3H]-overflow was expressed as the ratio of the overflow
evoked by S2 to that evoked by S1.
In vitro electrophysiological recordings in DRN.
In general the methodology described by Greuel and Glaser (1992)
was
followed. After decapitation under light ether anaesthesia, the
brainstems of male Wistar rats (100-120 g) were dissected and mounted
on a vibratome chuck for cutting 350-µm slices. During cutting, the
brainstem was submerged in cold (1-3°C) carbogenated buffer. The
slices were then transferred into a submersion-type slice chamber and
allowed to recover for at least 60 min. The ACSF contained (in mM):
NaCl (124), KCl (5), CaCl2 (2),
NaH2PO4 (1.25), MgSO4 (2),
NaHCO3 (26), D-glucose (10); pH: 7.4. (L)-Noradrenaline (5 µM) was added to the ACSF to activate the otherwise silent neurons
(VanderMaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
). Conventional extracellular recording techniques were used. Briefly, tungsten electrodes
(impedance: 12 M
) were advanced by means of a hand-driven Leitz
micromanipulator into the tissue until the activity of a neuron was
detected on the oscilloscope. Electrode signals were passed through a
high impedance probe, amplified by a factor of 1000 and bandpass
filtered at 1 to 3 kHz (
3 dB). The signals were monitored on an
oscilloscope and audiosystem, and finally fed through a window
discriminator into an A/D converter (Coulbourn Instruments, Allentown,
PA) of a PC-based digital system. Data were collected with a bin width of 5 sec. Putative 5-HTergic neurons were identified by their regular,
low frequency, spontaneous activity (1-5 Hz) and by their response to
application of 8-OH-DPAT (VanderMaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
). When the
neuronal activity was reduced by the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, only those experiments that showed at least a partial recovery
of activity after wash out of the drugs were considered for analysis.
The drugs tested were dissolved to the desired concentrations and
introduced into the slice chamber by means of a stopcock arrangement. The temperature of the ACSF was held constant at 35°C.
In vivo electrophysiological recordings in DRN.
In general, the methodology described in Sommermeyer et al.
(1993b)
was followed. For extracellular single unit recordings, rats
were placed in a stereotactic head holder after being anaesthetized with a mixture of xylazine (2 mg/kg), ketamine (100 mg/kg) and chlorpromazine (10 mg/kg) administered i.m. This mixture allowed the
use of low doses of each anaesthetic compound and, in addition, allowed
recordings for more than 2 hr without reinjection of anaesthetics. A
tungsten electrode (impedance: 12 M
, 10 Hz) was advanced in the DRN
(interaural line coordinates: F 1.2, H 3.5, L 0.0; Paxinos and Watson,
1982
, at an angle of 15° from the vertical plane). Inside the DRN,
the electrode was advanced slowly in steps of 2 µm until the
spontaneous activity of a neuron was detected. Conventional electronic
equipment was used to process the signals (see higher). Putative
5-HTergic neurons were identified according to the above mentioned
criteria. Compounds were administered i.v.
8-OH-DPAT drug discrimination.
Rats were trained to
discriminate 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.; T, 15 min, n = 20) from vehicle in a standard two-lever fixed ratio 10 food-reinforced
operant procedure according to the method described by Schreiber and De
Vry (1993)
. Daily sessions were terminated after 50 reinforcers or
after 10 min, whichever came first. Discrimination criterion consisted
of 10 consecutive sessions in which not more than nine responses
occurred on the nonreinforced lever before the first reinforcer was
obtained. Generalization tests were performed when the number of
incorrect responses before the first reinforcer was not more than four
on three consecutive sessions and when at least 20 reinforcers were
obtained per session. During testing, responding on the selected lever,
i.e., the lever on which 10 responses accumulated first, was
reinforced for the remainder of the session. All animals were tested
with different doses of the training compound (0.01-0.4 mg/kg, i.p.).
Generalization tests were performed 15 min after application of the
test compound (except for a time-dependency study, where 0.1 mg/kg
BAY × 3702 was tested 15-120 min after application, and the oral
dose-dependency study, where BAY × 3702 was tested 30 min after
application). In general, each dose of a test compound was tested in
six to eight rats, randomly allocated to each test condition. Test
results were expressed as the percentage of rats that selected the drug lever (% drug lever selections). Behavioral disruption was expressed as the percentage of rats which failed to select a lever.
Body temperature. Different groups of rats (n = 5-7 per group) were treated with vehicle or various doses of a test compound and their body temperature was oesophagally measured repeatedly at fixed time points. Time points measured included: 5 min before, and either 7.5, 15, 30 and 60 min (i.v. dose-response determination), or 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min (i.p. and p.o. dose-response determination) after drug administration. For graphical presentation (fig. 10, lower panel) and calculation of ED50 values, results were expressed as temperature change in °C relative to baseline value, and corrected for the temperature change observed in the vehicle control group. In an antagonism experiment, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle was administered 60 min before administration of BAY × 3702 (0.03 mg/kg, i.v.) or vehicle. Body temperature was measured 5 min before, and 7.5, 15, 30 and 60 min after the i.v. bolus injection.
Determination of plasma ACTH concentrations.
Endocrinological experiments were performed between 10:00
A.M. and 2:30 P.M.. At selected time points
after p.o. administration of drug or vehicle (n = 5-6
per group), rats were killed by decapitation. Trunk blood was collected
in prechilled tubes containing 0.5 ml of 0.3 M EDTA, pH: 7.4. Blood
samples were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 20 min
(4°C) and plasma was stored at
20°C until analysis. Plasma levels
of ACTH were determined using commercially available radioimmunoassay
kits. The sensitivity limit of the assays was 7 pg/ml. The inter- and
intraassay variation coefficients were less than 10% in all cases. For
graphical presentation and calculation of ED50 values,
results were expressed as % change as compared to baseline values.
Data analysis. In general, all in vitro biochemical experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least twice; representative experiments were selected for data presentation. Also in the case of the electrophysiological experiments, representative experiments were selected for data presentation. Hypothermia and endocrinological data were analyzed by ANOVA; followed, where appropriate, by Tukey's post hoc comparisons. In general, the MED was defined as the lowest dose which induced a statistically significant effect (P < .05). Least-square linear regression analysis was used to estimate ED50, ID50 and T1/2 values and the corresponding 95% CL after log-probit conversion of the data. ED50 values with nonoverlapping 95% CL were considered to be significantly different.
Drugs and chemicals. Radioactive ligands and reagents were from Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, FRG, Du Pont NEN, Bad Homburg, FRG or New England Nuclear, Dreieich, FRG. Ketanserin was a gift from Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium, clonidine from Boehringer, Ingelheim, FRG. Commercially obtained compounds were: 5-HT (Merck, Darmstadt, FRG); (L)-noradrenaline (Fluka, Deisenhofen, FRG); HEAT (Beiersdorf, Hamburg, FRG); (L)-quinpirole (RBI, Cologne, FRG); haloperidol, idazoxan and (D,L)-propranolol (Sigma, Deisenhofen, FRG); sulpiride and methiothepin (Biotrend, Cologne, FRG); ketamine (Parke Davis, Berlin, FRG). BAY × 3702, BAY × 3703, ipsapirone, 8-OH-DPAT and WAY-100635 were synthesized at the Chemistry Department of Bayer AG, Wuppertal, FRG; xylazine and chlorpromazine were obtained from Bayer AG, Leverkusen, FRG. All other chemicals were purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, FRG, or Sigma, Deisenhofen, FRG. Radioimmunoassay kits for the determination of plasma ACTH levels were obtained from DPC Biermann Ltd., Bad Nauheim, FRG. Compounds or their appropriate vehicles were given i.v., i.p. or p.o. in a volume of 1, 2 and 5 ml/kg body weight, respectively. BAY × 3702, BAY × 3703 and 8-OH-DPAT were dissolved in HCl or lactic acid and distilled water or a 0.9% NaCl solution; ipsapirone and WAY-100635 were dissolved in distilled water. Doses were expressed as the salts.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Receptor binding. BAY × 3702 bound with high affinity to 5-HT1A receptors of different species, including human, rat and calf, and different brain areas, including, cortex and hippocampus; with Ki values ranging from 0.19 (calf hippocampus) to 0.58 nM (rat hippocampus; table 2). The binding is considered to be stereoselective as it was found that the affinity of the (+)-enantiomer, BAY × 3703, was about 10-fold lower than that of BAY × 3702 (fig. 2). 5-HT1A receptor affinity of the reference compounds 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone was generally lower; the potency difference vs. BAY × 3702 being about factor 1.5 to 10 (depending on particular brain tissue) and factor 5 to 15, for 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, respectively (table 2; fig. 2). As measured in calf hippocampus, affinity of BAY × 3702 to 5-HT1A receptors was about 20 times higher as compared with 5-HT (Ki: ~4 nM). BAY × 3702 exhibited also a relatively high to moderate affinity for alpha1- and alpha2-receptors (Ki values: 6 and 7 nM, respectively), 5-HT7 and 5-HT1D receptors (7 and 36 nM, respectively) and dopamine D2 and D4 receptors (48 and 91 nM, respectively; table 2). In more than 50 other receptor binding assays, weak affinity was only detected for 5-HT2(c) receptors (310-380 nM) and sigma binding sites (176 nM, table 2). The binding profile of BAY × 3702 is considered to be relatively selective because at least one order of magnitude differentiates its binding to the 5-HT1A receptor from its binding to other receptors.
|
|
5-HT1A receptor coupled adenylate cyclase in rat hippocampal membranes. BAY × 3702 inhibited forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in rat hippocampal membranes with an IC50 value of 1.87 ± 0.74 nM (mean ± 1 S.E.M., n = 5, fig. 3). The maximal level of inhibition was similar to that caused by 8-OH-DPAT and 5-HT (data not shown), but more than that of ipsapirone (fig. 3). Therefore, BAY × 3702 and 8-OH-DPAT can be characterized as full agonists; whereas ipsapirone behaves as partial agonist in this assay. In accordance with the 5-HT1A receptor binding data, BAY × 3702 was more potent than 8-OH-DPAT (IC50: 25.25 ± 0.06 nM, n = 4) and ipsapirone (IC50: > 1 µM, fig. 3). The (+)-enantiomer BAY × 3703 was about 10-fold less potent than BAY × 3702 (IC50: 21.5 ± 1.5 nM, n = 2, fig. 3). The inhibitory effect of BAY × 3702 on cyclase activity could be completely reversed by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (fig. 4).
|
|
5-HT1D receptor coupled adenylate cyclase in calf substantia nigra membranes. BAY × 3702 inhibited the forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase in calf substantia nigra membranes by approximately 13% with an IC50 value of 100 nM, whereas 5-HT induced an inhibition of about 16% (IC50: ~20 nM). Therefore BAY × 3702 can be characterized as a relatively weak 5-HT1D receptor agonist (data not shown).
Dopamine D2 receptor regulated cAMP levels. The dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole reduced the cAMP levels in forskolin-stimulated LZR-1 cells with an IC50 value of 20 nM (fig. 5, left panel). BAY × 3702 had no inhibitory effect on the cAMP concentration in prestimulated cells. However, similar to the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride, BAY × 3702 antagonized the quinpirole (10 µM) induced inhibition of cAMP formation in forskolin-treated cells (fig. 5, right panel), and thus behaved like a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist.
|
Alpha1-adrenergic receptor linked phosphoinositide breakdown. Activation by noradrenaline of alpha-1-adrenergic receptors in primary cultures of rat brain astrocytes led to a stimulation of PI turnover and thus to an increased formation of inositol phosphates. BAY × 3702 by itself did not affect PI-turnover. It antagonized, however, the noradrenaline-induced stimulation of inositol phosphate formation with an IC50 value of 0.29 µM (data not shown). Therefore BAY × 3702 can be considered as a relatively weak antagonist at alpha-1-adrenergic receptors.
Alpha2-adrenergic receptor regulated cAMP levels and 5-HT release. Intrinsic activity at alpha-2-adrenergic receptors was investigated in two ways. First, in NG 108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells the PGE1-induced elevation of the intracellular cAMP level was reduced by the alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist clonidine via interaction with alpha-2-adrenergic receptors (fig. 6). BAY × 3702 alone had no effect on the PGE1-stimulated cAMP formation. The attenuation of cAMP levels by 1 µM clonidine, however, was concentration-dependently reversed by BAY × 3702 as it was by the alpha-2-adrenergic receptor antagonist idazoxan (10 µM, fig. 6). Second, clonidine inhibited by activation of alpha2-adrenergic receptors the electrically evoked release of 5-HT from rat brain cortical slices, while BAY × 3702 was without effect (fig. 7). The inhibition caused by 10 and 100 nM, but not of 1 µM clonidine was completely antagonized by 1 µM BAY × 3702. The results from these two assay systems characterize the compound as an alpha-2-adrenergic receptor antagonist.
|
|
In vitro electrophysiological recordings in DRN.
The neurons were identified as presumably 5-HTergic by standard
criteria (Vandermaelen and Aghajanian, 1983
), such as low frequency
firing and responsivity to application of 8-OH-DPAT (50 nM, fig.
8, upper panel). Bath application of
BAY × 3702 at concentrations as low as 1 to 3 nM produced a
complete, relatively long-lasting and reversible inhibition of cell
firing in the DRN (fig. 8, upper panel). The recovery of activity was
always slower than the recovery after 8-OH-DPAT, possibly indicative of
a slower dissociation constant for BAY × 3702. The amount of
inhibition, as well as the duration was concentration dependent. It
was, however, difficult to obtain the usual graded dose-response
relationship due to the narrow margin between the no-effect and the
full-effect concentration. BAY × 3702 appeared to act as a full
agonist in all experiments and, although no extensive dose-response
relationships were established, the compound was clearly more potent
than 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone; the difference in potency vs.
BAY × 3702 being approximately 1 and 2 orders of magnitude,
respectively (for ipsapirone, see fig. 8, lower panel). The
nonselective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist propranolol, when
tested at a concentration that did by itself not produce any changes in
neuronal activity (100 µM), was able to completely antagonize the
inhibitory effect of BAY × 3702 (2 nM) when tested in conjunction
with the latter compound (data not shown). When propranolol was applied
after BAY × 3702 recovery of activity was accelerated; suggesting
competitive displacement of BAY × 3702 from its binding sites
(data not shown).
|
In vivo electrophysiological recordings in DRN. BAY × 3702 (0.5 µg/kg, i.v.) induced an almost complete and relatively long-lasting inhibition of DRN neuronal firing (fig. 9, upper panel). The onset of inhibition occurred with a delay of 2 to 4 min and the inhibition was completely reversible. Again, BAY × 3702 appeared to be about 10 times more potent than 8-OH-DPAT and about 50 times more potent than ipsapirone (fig. 9, middle and lower panel, respectively).
|
8-OH-DPAT drug discrimination. Sixteen of 20 rats learned to discriminate 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle; the median number of sessions to reach criterion being 38 (range: 23-70 sessions). Four rats were discarded after 70 sessions because of insufficient response rates (both under drug and vehicle conditions) or lack of discriminative stimulus control. Dose-dependent and complete generalization was obtained with the selected 5-HT1A receptor agonists [fig. 10, upper panel: 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 and 95% CL in mg/kg, i.p.: 0.028; 0.020-0.041), BAY × 3702 (0.022; 0.011-0.042), BAY × 3703 (1.38; CL not computable, data not shown) and ipsapirone (0.44; 0.23-0.85). With all compounds, complete generalization (100% drug lever selections) was obtained at doses devoid of behavioral disruptive effects (% lever selections not affected). However, although 8-OH-DPAT still induced complete generalization when tested at doses higher than the training dose, this coincided with severe behavioral disruption (ID50 for % lever selection with 95% CL in mg/kg, i.p.: 0.20; 0.15-0.27, data not shown). Dose-dependent and complete generalization was also obtained after oral administration of BAY × 3702 (0.38; 0.13-1.11; 100% generalization at 3 mg/kg, data not shown). The time-dependency study indicated that generalization of BAY × 3702 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) was maximal at 15 min (100% drug lever selections) and reduced to the vehicle level again (14.3% drug lever selections) at 2 h after administration (T1/2 and 95% CL in min: 58; 36-93; data not shown).
|
Body temperature. BAY × 3702 induced a dose- and time-dependent reduction in body temperature; the MED values being 0.01, 0.3 and 10 mg/kg after i.v., i.p. and p.o. administration, respectively (temperature reduction of at least 1°C, P < .05; for ED50 values see table 3). In general, the hypothermic effects of BAY × 3702 were pronounced, as a reduction of 2.5°C, compared to vehicle treatment, was obtained at the highest doses tested (fig. 10, lower panel). The time-dependency data indicated that effects were maximal between 0.5 and 1 hr after administration and no longer observed after 1, 2 and 4 hr, after i.v., i.p. and p.o. administration, respectively (fig. 11 and data not shown). After i.p. administration, BAY × 3702 was found to be about 3 times more potent than 8-OH-DPAT, and 30 times more potent than ipsapirone, and BAY × 3702 appeared to be slightly more efficient than the latter compounds (maximal body temperature reductions of 2.5, 1.9 and 1.7°C, for the highest tested doses of BAY × 3702, 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, respectively; fig. 10, lower panel; table 3). After oral administration, BAY × 3702 was about 10 times more potent than ipsapirone (MED values: 3 and 30 mg/kg, respectively; for ED50 values, see table 3). Again, BAY × 3702 appeared to be more effective than ipsapirone (maximal extent of hypothermia as compared to vehicle control: 2.5 and 2.0°C, respectively). The hypothermia induced by BAY × 3702 (0.03 mg/kg, i.v.) was abolished by pretreatment with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg, i.p.; T, 60 min; fig. 11).
|
|
Plasma ACTH concentrations. In preliminary experiments, it was found that BAY × 3702 and ipsapirone (30 mg/kg, p.o.) induced a time-dependent stimulation of plasma ACTH levels; the effect being maximal 30 min after application for both compounds (data not shown). Therefore, dose-dependency experiments were performed at the latter postapplication time interval (fig. 12). After oral administration, both compounds induced dose-dependent effects; BAY × 3702 being about five times more potent than ipsapirone (MED values: 10 and 75 mg/kg, respectively, P < .05; for ED50 values see table 3). In addition, BAY × 3702 appeared to be slightly more effective than ipsapirone (maximal extent of ACTH stimulation as compared to vehicle control: 380 and 321%, respectively).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We characterized the novel aminomethylchroman derivative BAY × 3702 (De Vry et al., 1997a
, b
) in a variety of in
vitro and in vivo models of 5-HT1A receptor
function. Selection of these models was such that it included models of
presynaptic or somatodendritic receptor activation, as well as models
of postsynaptic receptor activation. This is considered to be important
as the apparent intrinsic activity of a 5-HT1A receptor
ligand may depend on the particular assay system (for review, see De
Vry 1995
). Thus, it is generally found that the intrinsic activity of a
5-HT1A receptor ligand appears to be relatively higher (or
at least of equal magnitude) in models of presynaptic function, as
compared to models of postsynaptic function. (e.g., Di
Sciullo et al., 1990
; Foreman et al., 1995
; Glaser et al., 1991
; Hamon et al., 1988
; McCall
et al., 1994
; Millan et al., 1992
, 1993
).
Moreover, even in the case of models presumably reflecting activation
of postsynaptic receptors, the apparent intrinsic activity of a ligand
may vary from one model to another and it has been suggested that such
variations are related to different levels of spare receptors or
receptor reserve (e.g., Meller and Bohmaker, 1994
; Yocca
et al., 1992
; for discussion, see De Vry, 1995
). With these
restrictions in mind, BAY × 3702 was characterized in the present
study as a highly potent, relatively selective and orally active
5-HT1A receptor ligand with high intrinsic activity.
As compared with reference 5-HT1A receptor ligands,
BAY × 3702 appears to be about 2 to 20 times more potent than
8-OH-DPAT (Arvidsson et al., 1981
), and about 5 to 50 times
more potent than ipsapirone (Traber et al., 1984
) across the
diverse in vitro and in vivo models. In general,
the potency difference between 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone as obtained in
our study is very similar to the potency difference reported in the
literature using similar models (e.g., De Vry, 1995
; De Vry
et al., 1991
; Di Sciullo et al., 1990
; Gilbert
et al., 1988
; Hamon et al., 1988
; Jolas et al., 1995
, McCall et al., 1994
; Schechter et
al., 1990
; Schreiber et al., 1995
). It should be
realized, however, that the potency ratio obtained with these compounds
may depend to some extent on the route of administration, as well as on
the model. Although not explicitly compared for each route of
administration, potency differences appeared to be higher after i.v.
administration (e.g., in vivo electrophysiology model), as
compared with i.p. administration and, in particular, p.o.
administration (e.g., drug discrimination, hypothermia and
ACTH model), and this application-dependent finding reflects
pharmacokinetic factors [i.e., absolute bioavailability after oral administration in the rat is about three times higher for
ipsapirone than for BAY × 3702 (Langer M, Opitz W and
Schöllnhammer G, personal communication) for further
pharmacokinetic information on BAY × 3702, see De Vry et
al., 1997a
; Schwarz et al., 1997
]. However, for a
given route of administration, variation in the potency difference may
also reflect the relative involvement of pre- and postsynaptic
5-HT1A receptor populations with different levels of spare
receptors. Thus, it is conceivable that the potency difference between
compounds with different levels of intrinsic activity may appear to be
higher if no or relatively few spare receptors are present in the
system, and smaller if a relatively high level of spare receptors is
present in the system.
In the in vivo models, the same potency order of the
5-HT1A receptor agonists was maintained, independently of
the particular route of administration. Interestingly, however, for
each compound large potency differences were obtained dependent on the
model. Thus, the most sensitive model appeared to be the drug
discrimination model, followed by the hypothermia model and the ACTH
model (fig. 10; table 3). These sensitivity differences correlate with
the presumed involvement of pre- vs. postsynaptic receptors
in the model (for discussion, see De Vry, 1995
). Thus, drug
discrimination (at least with the relatively low training dose of
8-OH-DPAT used in our study) is supposed to be a model of presynaptic
function (Schreiber and De Vry, 1993
); whereas hypothermia is thought
to be a model of pre- and postsynaptic receptor activation (Glaser et al., 1991
), and ACTH stimulation is generally considered
to be a model of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor activation
(Pan and Gilbert, 1992
; but see Bluet-Pajot et al., 1995
).
In general, potency differences obtained in the in vivo
models reflect the differences in affinity for the 5-HT1A
receptor as assessed in the binding studies, as well as the differences
in potency in the adenylate cyclase model of 5-HT1A
receptor activation. Moreover, the stereoselectivity observed in the
5-HT1A receptor binding assay was retained in the adenylate
cyclase model and in an in vivo model (i.e., drug
discrimination); in each case the (
)-enantiomer BAY × 3702 was
found to be 10 to 30 times more potent than the (+)-enantiomer BAY × 3703 (figs. 2 and 3).
With respect to intrinsic activity, BAY × 3702 appears to be a
5-HT1A receptor full agonist as it was found that it was
equally, or slightly more efficient, than the full agonist 8-OH-DPAT;
and more efficient than the partial agonist ipsapirone. This
differentiation tended to be maximal in those models that are supposed
to be mediated postsynaptically (or have at least a postsynaptic
component). Thus, in the adenylate cyclase model, BAY × 3702, as
well as 8-OH-DPAT, was more effective than ipsapirone. The finding that
8-OH-DPAT is more effective than ipsapirone in this model is in
accordance with previous studies (e.g., De Vry et
al., 1991
; but see Hamon et al., 1988
where it is
reported that ipsapirone shows the same level of efficacy than
8-OH-DPAT), and is most likely related to the presumed absence of spare
receptors (Yocca et al., 1992
). Also in a
forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase assay using chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cells expressing human 5-HT1A receptors,
8-OH-DPAT has been reported to have a higher intrinsic activity than
ipsapirone (e.g., McCall et al., 1994
). In the
in vivo models with a postsynaptic 5-HT1A
receptor involvement, such as hypothermia and ACTH stimulation, BAY × 3702 and 8-OH-DPAT were slightly more efficient than
ipsapirone (see also, Glaser et al., 1991
; Di Sciullo
et al., 1990
; but see Gilbert et al., 1988
). In
the models of presynaptic function, such as inhibition of DRN neuronal
firing, or drug discrimination, estimation of possible differences in
intrinsic activity between BAY × 3702 and 8-OH-DPAT, on the one
hand, and ipsapirone on the other hand was virtually impossible, as
ipsapirone induced already maximal effects (see also: Schechter
et al., 1990
; Schreiber and De Vry, 1993
; Schreiber et
al., 1995
).
Further evidence for the suggestion that BAY × 3702 is an agonist
at 5-HT1A receptors was obtained by means of antagonism tests. Thus, both in the adenylate cyclase model, the
electrophysiological model and the hypothermia model, pharmacological
effects induced by BAY × 3702 were successfully blocked by a
selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (i.e.,
WAY-100635; Forster et al., 1995
), or a nonselective
5-HT1A receptor antagonist (i.e., propranolol, Sprouse and Aghajanian, 1986
). Although it remains to be determined whether the effects obtained with BAY × 3702 in the drug
discrimination model can be reversed by a 5-HT1A receptor
antagonist, it was found that WAY-100635 was able to antagonize the
BAY × 3702 cue in rats trained to discriminate this compound (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle in a similar drug discrimination procedure
(De Vry et al., 1997a
).
The binding profile of BAY × 3702 was characterized by testing
the compound in more than 50 binding assays covering a wide range of
classical receptors, enzymes and ion channels. The binding profile of
the compound is considered to be relatively selective as at least one
order of magnitude differentiates its binding to 5-HT1A
receptors from its binding to other receptors. Besides 5-HT1A receptors (Ki: 0.2-0.6 nM),
BAY × 3702 bound also with relatively high to moderate affinity
to the following receptors: alpha-1- and
alpha-2-adrenergic (Ki: 6 and 7 nM,
respectively); 5-HT7- and 5-HT1D (7 and 36 nM);
dopamine D2- and D4 (48 and 91 nM); sigma sites
(176 nM) and 5-HT2C (310 nM); others: >10 µM. At those
receptors where BAY × 3702 bound with lower affinity, the
compound appeared to be either an agonist (5-HT1D
receptors) or an antagonist (alpha-1, alpha-2 and
D2 receptors). It can be hypothesized, however, that
receptor interactions other than those with 5-HT1A
receptors are not essentially involved in the in vivo effects described in the present study, as it was found that the effects induced by BAY × 3702 were virtually completely blocked by pretreatment with 5-HT1A receptor antagonists. It can
even be hypothesized that at least at the doses that are
therapeutically relevant (i.e., 1-30 µg/kg, i.v.;
0.01-0.3 mg/kg, i.p.; 0.1-3 mg/kg, p.o.; for ED50 values
obtained in animal models of neuroprotection, depression and anxiety,
see De Vry et al., 1997a
; Horváth et al.,
1997
), the behavioral effects of the compound are mediated exclusively
by interactions with 5-HT1A receptors. This is suggested by
the finding that the BAY × 3702 cue (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) did not generalize to the alpha-1- and alpha-2-adrenergic
antagonists prazosin and idazoxan, nor to the D2 receptor
antagonist raclopride (De Vry J and Jentzsch J, unpublished data), and
the finding that the anxiolytic effects observed with the compound in
the shock-induced ultrasonic vocalization rat model of anxiety, as well
as the antidepressive effects observed in the forced swimming rat model
of depression were completely blocked by the 5-HT1A
receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (De Vry et al., 1997a
). In
line with these findings, preliminary experiments indicate that the
neuroprotective effects obtained with BAY × 3702 in a rat model
of permanent focal cerebral ischemia (i.e., middle cerebral
artery occlusion) can be attenuated by cotreatment with WAY-100635 (De
Vry et al., 1997a
; Horváth et al., 1997
).
Although it was not the aim of the present study to test explicitly the selectivity ratio in vivo, some behavioral data in addition to the data obtained in the drug discrimination procedures mentioned above suggest indirectly that the compound is a fairly selective 5-HT1A receptor ligand. Thus, it was found that pretreatment with BAY × 3702 (0.01-1 mg/kg, i.p.), as well as with 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, was unable to block the discriminative effects of d-amphetamine in rats trained to discriminate the latter compound (1 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle (De Vry J, unpublished data). Because this model is sensitive to detect dopamine D2 antagonism in vivo (both haloperidol and raclopride attenuate the discriminative effects of d-amphetamine with MED values of 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p., respectively; De Vry J, unpublished data), it can be concluded that the D2 vs. 5-HT1A selectivity ratio of BAY × 3702 in vivo is at least factor 30 (comparison of the potency of BAY × 3702 to generalize to the 8-OH-DPAT cue and its potency to block the amphetamine cue). This conclusion is underscored by the observation that BAY × 3702 (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.), as well as 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, are not effective in a conditioned avoidance reaction paradigm in rats and fail to block apomorphine induced climbing in mice; two additional models sensitive to dopamine D2 antagonists (MED value of haloperidol and raclopride in both models: 0.1-0.3 mg/kg, i.p.; De Vry J, unpublished data). It remains to be determined to what extent possible interactions of BAY × 3702 with adrenergic, D4 and 5-HT1D and 5-HT7 receptors occur in vivo.
Preclinical evidence has suggested that selective, high affinity
5-HT1A receptor ligands with a high level of intrinsic
activity offer an improved therapeutic profile as compared with
compounds with a partial agonist profile (see introduction and De Vry,
1995
, 1996
). BAY × 3702 was derived from a project aimed at
identifying selective, high affinity, orally active 5-HT1A
receptor full agonists. Recently, the compound has entered clinical
trials to verify the promising neuroprotective efficacy observed in a
wide spectrum of preclinical models (De Vry et al., 1997a
,
b
; Horváth and Augstein, 1997
; Horváth et al.,
1997
).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The excellent technical assistance of Ms. S. Beck, G. Eckel, M. Faßbender, U. Gassen, C. Himmel-Berg, G. Lüpkes, H. Meyes, S. Reddig, W. Scheip, R. Schneider and Mr. K. R. Jentzsch is gratefully acknowledged. Mr. H. Schweitzer and H. Demmer are thanked for graphical support and Dr. T. Fahrig is thanked for assistance in the alpha-1-adrenergic PI assay. Drs. B. Junge and J. Traber are thanked for their support and contributions to this project.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication November 7, 1997.
Received for publication June 13, 1997.
1 Chemistry Department, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, FRG.
2 Central Research, Bayer AG, Uerdingen, FRG. Deceased January 5, 1997.
3 Current address: BPA-SP, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, FRG.
4 Bayer Vital GmbH & Co. KG, Leverkusen, FRG.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Jean De Vry, CNS Research, Troponwerke GmbH & Co. KG, Neurather Ring 1, 51063 Cologne, FRG.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACFS, artificial cerebrospinal
fluid;
ACTH, adrenocorticotropin;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
BAY r
1531, 6-methoxy-4-(di-n-propylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz(c,d)indole
hydrochloride;
BAY × 3702, R-(
)-2-{4-[(chroman-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-butyl}-1,1-dioxo-benzo[d]isothiazolone
hydrochloride ;
BAY × 3703, S-(+)-2-{4-[(chroman-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-butyl}-1,1-dioxo-benzo[d]isothiazolone
hydrochloride ;
CL, confidence limits;
cAMP, cyclic AMP;
DOB, bromophenyl-dimethoxy-aminopropan;
DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus;
DTG, di-tolylguanidine;
ED50, effective dose50;
8-OH-DPAT, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin;
HEAT, hydroxyphenylethyl-aminomethyltetralone;
ID50, inhibitory
dose50;
InsPn, inositolphosphates;
LSD, lysergic acid diethylamide;
LY228729, (
)-4-(dipropylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz-{c,d}indole-6-carboxamide;
LY274601, R-(+)-8-thiomethyl-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin
hydrochloride;
LY293284, (
)-4R-6-acetyl-4-(di-n-propylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz[c,d]indole;
MDL 72832, 8-[4-(1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethylamino)butyl]-8-azaspiro-[4,5]decane-7,9-dione;
MKC-242, 5-{3-[((2S)-1,4-benzodioxan-2-ylmethyl)amino]propoxy}-1,3-benzodioxole
hydrochloride;
MED, minimal effective dose;
PGE1, prostaglandin E1;
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin);
S 14671, 1-[2-(2-thenoylamino)ethyl]-4[1-(7-methoxynaphtyl)]-piperazine;
S
20499, (+)-4-[N-(5-methoxy-chroman-3-yl)N-propylamino]butyl-8-azaspiro-(4,5)-decane-7,9-dione;
T1/2, half life time;
U-92016A, (+)-(R)-2-cyano-N,N-dipropyl-8-amino-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-3H-benz[e]indole;
WAY-100635, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N(2-pyridinyl)
cyclohexane carboxamide trihydrochloride .
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|