JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wharton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Polak, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wharton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Polak, J. M.

Vol. 284, Issue 1, 323-336, 1998

Differential Distribution of Angiotensin AT2 Receptors in the Normal and Failing Human Heart1

John Wharton, Kevin Morgan, Richard A. D. Rutherford, John D. Catravas, Adrian Chester, Bruce F. Whitehead, Marc R. De Leval, Magdi H. Yacoub and Julia M. Polak

Department of Histochemistry (J.W., K.M., R.A.D.R., J.M.P.), Imperial College School of Medicine, The Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 ONN, UK; Vascular Biology Centre (J.D.C.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia; Heart Science Centre (A.C., M.H.Y.), Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK; and Cardiothoracic Unit (B.F.W., M.R.DeL.), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London WC1 3JH, UK


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cardiac expression of angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes is species dependent, and changes in their relative proportion may influence myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis. Regional differences in the distribution of Ang II receptors in the normal and failing human heart were assessed using 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding and quantitative autoradiography. Receptor subtypes were distinguished by their affinity for selective nonpeptide antagonists (losartan and PD123319) and sensitivity to dithiothreitol. Ventricular and atrial tissues displayed a heterogeneous distribution of ligand binding sites. AT2 receptors predominated, representing 70% to 77% of the sites in normal and noninfarcted myocardium. Endocardial, interstitial, perivascular and infarcted regions in the ventricles of patients with end-stage ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy exhibited a significantly greater density (P < .001) of high affinity AT2 binding sites (Kd = 0.57 nmol/liter) compared with adjacent noninfarcted myocardium. Regions displaying the relative increase in AT2 binding sites corresponded to areas of fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, shown by picrosirius red staining. AT1 binding sites were localized to nerves, occurred at relatively low density in coronary vessels and represented only 23% to 29% of myocardial 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites. The border zone between infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium characteristically contained numerous microvessels, exhibiting perivascular AT2 receptors and endothelial angiotensin converting enzyme activity, as demonstrated by binding of 125I-351A. Specific myocardial AT2 receptor mRNA transcripts (approx 3 kb) were identified and exhibited alternative splicing of untranslated 5' exons. The differential distribution of cardiac Ang II receptor subtypes and selective increase in binding to AT2 sites in the diseased heart suggest that cells bearing the AT2 receptor represent a significant target for Ang II, possibly contributing to its growth-related actions.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Increasing evidence indicates that the renin-angiotensin system is important in the physiology and pathology of the heart and that Ang II acts as a growth factor, influencing myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996; Pfeffer et al., 1995; Weber et al., 1993; Weber and Brilla, 1991). Expression of angiotensinogen, renin, ACE and Ang II receptors has been demonstrated in human cardiac tissues (Morgan et al., 1994; Paul et al., 1993; Schütz et al., 1996) and changes in the expression of these genes associated with cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial infarction and impaired cardiac function (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996; Pfeffer et al., 1995; Weber et al., 1993; Weber and Brilla, 1991). At the cellular level, Ang II induces expression of both immediate-early genes and late markers of cardiac hypertrophy in neonatal rat myocytes (Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993) and stimulates mitogenesis, collagen synthesis and expression of transcription factors in cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts (Crabos et al., 1994; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993; Schorb et al., 1993; Villarreal et al., 1993). Although relatively little is known about the growth-related actions of Ang II in the human heart, it has been reported to influence collagen (Brilla et al., 1995) and DNA synthesis in isolated human cardiac fibroblasts (Neubeta et al., 1994, 1996). The importance of the renin angiotensin system in humans has also been underlined by the effectiveness of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of patients with various forms of heart disease (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996; Pfeffer et al., 1995; Weber et al., 1993; Weber and Brilla, 1991).

The actions of Ang II are mediated by specific membrane bound receptors, of which two main subtypes have been identified, AT1 and AT2 receptors, by their pharmacological and molecular characteristics (Timmermans et al., 1993). Although both receptors have a similar affinity for Ang II and the peptide antagonist (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II, they may be distinguished by their distinct affinity for receptor selective peptide analogs and nonpeptide compounds. AT1 receptors display a high affinity for nonpeptide antagonists such as losartan (Chiu et al., 1990; Whitebread et al., 1989) and eprosartan (Weinstock et al., 1991), whereas AT2 receptors have high affinity for the nonpeptide antagonist PD 123319 (Dudley et al., 1990), and peptide analogs such as CGP 42112A (Whitebread et al., 1991) and [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II (Speth and Kim, 1990). The two receptors may also be identified on the basis of their sensitivity to the disulfide reducing agent DTT, binding to AT1 receptors being inhibited by DTT, whereas that to AT2 receptors is unaffected or enhanced in the presence of DTT (Chiu et al., 1989; Whitebread et al., 1989). Agonist binding to the two receptors also exhibits a differential sensitivity to guanine nucleotides (Dudley et al., 1990). Using these criteria, AT1 and AT2 receptors have been identified on isolated rat cardiac myocytes (Meggs et al., 1993; Reiss et al., 1993) and fibroblasts (Crabos et al., 1994; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993; Schorb et al., 1993; Villarreal et al., 1993) and in the myocardium of several mammals (Rogg et al., 1990; Chang and Lotti, 1991; Nozawa et al., 1994), including humans (Nozawa et al., 1994; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995; Rogg et al., 1996). The nucleotide sequences and genomic organization of the human AT2 (Martin and Elton, 1995; Martin et al., 1994) and AT1 receptor (Bergsma et al., 1992; Guo et al., 1994; Konishi et al., 1994) genes have been determined, and the expression of both receptors has been demonstrated in human heart. At the receptor level, however, there are significant species differences in the distribution of Ang II receptor subtypes, with most studies indicating that AT1 sites represent the majority of cardiac receptors in experimental animals (Nozawa et al., 1994), whereas the AT2 subtype predominates in membrane preparations of the human heart (Nozawa et al., 1994; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995; Rogg et al., 1996).

Expression of the AT2 receptor subtype in the cardiovascular system changes during development (Hunt et al., 1995; Matsubara et al., 1994; Sechi et al., 1992; Shanmugam et al., 1996) is growth dependent and modulated by vasoactive factors such as Ang II (Kijima et al., 1996). Cardiac expression of the AT2 receptor is also increased, together with the AT1 receptor, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (Suzuki et al., 1993) and after myocardial infarction (Nio et al., 1995). Furthermore, a switch from AT1 to AT2 receptor subtype expression has been demonstrated in the hypertrophic rat heart after pressure and volume overload (Lopez et al., 1994; Poole et al., 194) and in a canine model of right ventricular hypertrophy (Lee et al., 1996). Although the functional significance of the cardiac AT2 receptor has yet to be established, it has been shown to mediate a number of Ang II-induced responses in the cardiovascular system. These include modulation of collagen metabolism in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts (Brilla et al., 1994), stimulation of arachidonic acid release from rat cardiac myocytes (Lokuta et al., 1994) and inhibition of cell proliferation and growth by antagonizing the growth-promoting effects of the AT1 receptor (Booz and Baker, 1996; Levy et al., 1996; Nakajima et al., 1995; Stoll et al., 1995).

The proportion of Ang II receptors in human atrial tissues is influenced by cardiac function, with the number of AT2 binding sites increasing and AT1 sites declining with the degree of impairment of cardiac function (Rogg et al., 1996). Establishing the localization of these receptors, in ventricular as well as atrial tissues, and determining disease-related differences in receptor distribution represent important steps toward further understanding the cellular targets for Ang II and the pathophysiological significance of Ang II receptor subtypes in the human heart. Two studies to date have attempted to localize these receptors in human cardiac tissues but were either unable to distinguish receptor subtypes due to the lack of selective ligands (Urata et al., 1989) or because only the presence of receptors in the right atrial appendage was examined (Brink et al., 1996). Furthermore, although ACE expression is reported to be increased in the failing human heart (Studer et al., 1994; Zisman et al., 1995) the cellular distribution of ACE expression was not determined and has not been compared with that of Ang II receptors in human cardiac tissues.

The purpose of this study was therefore to determine the localization and binding characteristics of Ang II receptors in the explanted failing and normal human heart, using selective peptide analogs and nonpeptide antagonists to distinguish AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes, and to compare by autoradiography the distribution of specific Ang II and ACE binding sites.

    Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Materials. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II and 125I-CGP 42112A [125I-(N-alpha -nicotinoyl-Tyr-(N-alpha -CBZ-Arg)Lys-His-Pro-Ile-OH); specific activity, 2200 Ci/mmol] were purchased from DuPont-New England Nuclear (Stevenage, UK). 125I-Ang IV (specific activity, 2000 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham International (Amersham, UK). Losartan [DuP 753: 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-l-[(2'(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)-methyl]imidazole] was obtained from DuPont Merck (Wilmington, DE). Eprosartan (SKF-108566: E-alpha -2-[2-butyl-1-[(carboxyphenyl)methyl]1H-imidazol-5-yl)methylene]-2-thiophenepropanoic acid)was from SmithKline Beecham (Collegeville, PA). PD123319 [1(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)methyl-5-diphenylacetyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid-2HCl] was from Parke-Davis (Ann Arbor, MI). Unlabeled CGP 42112A and [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II were purchased from Neosytem Laboratorie (Strasbourg, France). Unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II, Ang II, Ang IV (Ang II 3-8 fragment) and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical (Poole, UK). Primary antisera (JC/70A, A082) were obtained from DAKO (High Wycombe, UK). Biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG and avidin-biotin complex were from Vector Laboratories (Peterborough, UK).

Patients and tissues. Heart tissues were obtained from patients undergoing cardiac transplantation and donor tissues not suitable for transplantation (table 1) and comprised transmural samples from the lateral walls of the ventricles and the interventricular septum. Atrial tissues were also obtained in a proportion of cases. Tissue samples were either snap-frozen, for mRNA extraction, or mounted on cork mats, embedded in mounting medium (Tissue Tek; Miles, Elkhart, IN) and frozen in melting dichlorodifluoromethane (Arcton-12; I.C.I., Runcorn, Cheshire, UK) or isopentane, for autoradiography and staining. Frozen tissues were stored either in liquid nitrogen or at -40°C.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Patient details

In vitro autoradiographic analysis of Ang II binding sites. Cryostat sections (10 µm thick) were cut, and thaw-mounted onto chrome-alum-gelatin-coated microscope slides and stored at -20°C. Sections were preincubated in 10 mmol/liter sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 10 mmol/liter MgCl2 and 28 µmol/liter bacitracin for 10 min at 20° to 22°C, followed by incubation in buffer containing 250 pmol/liter 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II and 1% bovine serum albumin, for 5 to 180 min at 20° to 22°C, as previously described in studies on other human tissues (Knock et al., 1994; Walsh et al., 1994). Sections were washed in ice-cold buffer twice for 5 min at 4°C, quickly rinsed in ice-cold distilled water and dried under a stream of cold air. Nonspecific binding was determined by coincubating adjacent sections with 10-6 mol/liter unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II; the proportion of AT1 and AT2 binding sites was assessed by coincubating adjacent sections with 10-5 mol/liter AT1-selective (losartan) and AT2-selective (PD123319) antagonists. Association time course experiments were undertaken at 20° to 22°C, and ligand stability was assessed by reapplying the incubation medium to fresh adjacent sections, under identical conditions. Ang II binding sites were further characterized by incubating consecutive sections with 250 pmol/liter 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II in the presence of increasing concentrations (10-10 to 10-5 mol/liter) of unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II, Ang II, losartan, eprosartan, PD123319, CGP 42112A or [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II. Saturation studies were performed by incubating consecutive sections with increasing concentrations (50-2000 pmol/liter) of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II for 150 min at 20° to 22°C. The sensitivity of ligand binding to the sulfhydryl reducing agent DTT was investigated by incubating sections in the absence and presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT. The distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites was also compared with that of 250 pmol/liter 125I-CGP 42112A and 125I-Ang IV.

Macroautoradiographic images were obtained by apposing labeled sections to Hyperfilm-3H, together with 125I-microscales (Amersham International, Amersham, UK), for 3 to 4 days at 4°C. Autoradiograms were developed in Kodak D-19 developer for 5 min at 20°C and quantified by computer-assisted microdensitometry using a Seescan Sonata image analysis system and macroautoradiography software (Seescan, Cambridge, UK). Standard curves relating optical density to the amount of 125I-labeled ligand bound (amol·mm-2) were obtained for each film.

Calculations and statistical analysis. The equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) and maximum binding capacity (Bmax) were derived from saturation experiments. The concentrations of unlabeled ligands producing 50% inhibition of binding (IC50) of 250 pmol/liter 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II were calculated for each case from binding inhibition experiments. Inhibition constant (Ki) values were derived from IC50 values according to the equation of Cheng and Prusoff (1973): Ki = IC50/(1 + [L]/Kd), where [L] is the ligand concentration and Kd is the equilibrium dissociation constant derived from saturation experiments. Data from inhibition experiments were fitted to one- and two-site models, and the "best fit" was compared by F tests. Curve fitting and experimental derivation of binding constants were performed by iterative nonlinear regression using GraphPAD Inplot version 4 (GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA). Binding data are expressed as arithmetic or geometric means as appropriate, with 95% CI or S.E.M. values. Comparisons between groups were made by Student's t test (two-tailed) or one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni's correction, as appropriate. Values of P < .05 were taken as significant.

In vitro autoradiographic localization of ACE. Autoradiographic techniques were also used to localize ACE in unfixed cryostat sections of human heart, using a 125I-labeled tyrosyl-derivative of lisinopril, 125I-351A (N-[(s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-lysyl-tyrosyl-L-proline), essentially as described previously (Allen et al., 1988). 125I-351A (specific activity, 2000 Ci/mmol) was iodinated, as described previously (Fyhrquist et al., 1984), and high-performance liquid chromatography purification was performed with a Waters C18 µBondapak analytical column using a mobile phase consisting of 88% 0.04 mol/liter phosphoric acid with triethylamine, pH 3 (A), and 12% acetonitrile (B) for 10 min, followed by a linear gradient from 12% to 25% B over the next 40 min. The retention time for the monoiodinated product was 24 min. The stability of 125I-351A has been determined previously (Jackson et al., 1986). Sections were processed as described above for Ang II receptor autoradiography and incubated in phosphate buffer containing 0.3 nmol/liter 125I-351A for 60 min at 20° to 22°C, and labeled sections were exposed to Hyperfilm-3H for 3 to 7 days. Nonspecific binding was defined as that remaining in the presence of either 1 mmol/liter EDTA or 10-5 mol/liter lisinopril.

Microautoradiography. Further anatomic resolution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II and 125I-351A binding sites was achieved by microautoradiography. In comparison with other peptide binding sites, ligand binding to angiotensin II receptors is more readily dissociated when labeled sections are immersed directly in emulsion. Dry-apposition techniques were therefore used (Hudson, 1993), with labeled sections being apposed to emulsion (Ilford K5; Ilford, Cheshire, UK) -coated coverslips for 2 to 3 weeks at 4°C. After exposure, microautoradiographs were developed in Kodak D-19 developer for 3 min at 20°C and fixed, and the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and mounted in dibutylpthalate polystyrene xylene (DPX; BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK).

Picrosirius red staining. Collagen deposition was demonstrated by picrosirius red staining, essentially as described (Dobler and Spach, 1987) and validated (Pickering and Boughner, 1990) previously. This is a collagen-specific stain that enhances the natural birefringence of collagen fibers when viewed with polarized light. Briefly, sections were immersed in 0.2% (w/v) aqueous phosphomolybdic acid for up to 5 min, stained for 60 to 90 min in a 0.1% solution of sirius red F3B (BDH Laboratory Supplies) in saturated picric acid, rinsed in 0.01 M HCl, dehydrated, mounted in DBX and examined with an Olympus BX-60 microscope using polarized light.

Immunohistochemistry. To examine further the localization of specific ligand binding, consecutive sections to those used for autoradiography were processed for immunostaining using primary antisera raised to endothelial cell marker PECAM CD31 (clone JC/70A) (Parums et al., 1990). Cryostat sections were fixed in 10% formal saline for 10 min, rinsed and incubated with antiserum (diluted 1:1000) overnight at 4°C. Immunoreactivity was visualized by the avidin-biotin method of Hsu et al. (1981), with glucose oxidase/nickel enhancement (Shu et al., 1988). Controls included omission of the primary antiserum and replacement with nonimmune serum.

Angiotensin AT2 receptor expression. Detection of AT2 receptor expression in human cardiac tissues was confirmed by RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the single-step acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987). Yield (approx 300 µg/g wet weight of tissue) and purity were assessed spectrophotometrically (optical density, 260 and 280 nm). Then, 5-µg amounts of total RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA with random primers using a cDNA Cycle kit (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA). Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized (R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK) according to the nucleotide sequences and genomic organization of the human AT2 receptor (Martin and Elton, 1995). AT2 primer sequences were 5'-CGTCCCAGCGTCTGAGAG-3', which starts at position 74 in exon 1 (sense), and 5'-TCACAGGTCCAAAGAGCCA-3', which starts at position 1941 in exon 3 (antisense). Aliquots of cDNA (50 ng) were amplified using gene-specific pairs of primers in 50-µl reactions containing 1× NH4 buffer, 0.5 mmol/liter MgCl2, 0.1 µmol/liter concentration of each primer, 0.5 mmol/liter concentration of dNTPs, 1 µCi of [alpha -32P]dCTP and 2.5 units BioTaq DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK). After 5-min denaturation at 95°C, hot-start reactions were run into plateau phase (up to 50 cycles, denaturation at 93°C for 30 sec; annealing 60°C for 30 sec; extension at 72°C for 30 sec) and finally incubated at 72°C for 10 min, using a PHC-3 thermocycler (Techne, Cambridge, UK). Appropriate negative controls included omission of the RT step and inclusion of water blanks. PCR products were analyzed by nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Individual amplification products were excised from the gel, and the identity of each band was confirmed by direct cycle sequencing using a Circumvent kit (New England Biolabs, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, UK).

For Northern blot confirmation of human AT2 receptor expression, aliquots of total RNA (600 µg) were enriched for poly(A)+ sequences using Hybond mAP affinity paper chromatography (Amersham International), denatured by incubation in formamide, formaldehyde and 1× 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid/EDTA/sodium acetate buffer (Sigma) at 65°C for 10 min, cooled on ice, mixed with ethidium bromide and separated on a prerun 1.2% denaturing agarose gel, alongside RNA size markers (0.24-9.5-kb ladder; GIBCO BRL, Paisley, Scotland, UK). Separated transcripts were transferred to a Hybond-N filter (Amersham International), fixed by baking at 80°C for 2 hr, prehybridized for 4 hr and hybridized with a single-stranded 32P-labeled human AT2 receptor cDNA probe, prepared by PCR amplification (Stürzl and Roth, 1990). The probe corresponded to the 301-bp fragment of the receptor coding sequence of exon 3 and was generated using 5'-GCGGTCTTCACTTCGGGC-3' (sense) and 5'-ATCACAGGTCCAAAGAGCCA-3' (antisense) primers.

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Localization and characterization of angiotensin binding sites. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites were demonstrated in sections of microscopically normal atrium and ventricle obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis, congenital heart defects, craniocerebral trauma or ruptured aorta (table 1, patients 1-8). Specific binding sites were localized to the myocardium, throughout both atria and ventricles; the medial layer in coronary arteries and to nerves running with coronary vessels in the epicardium and myocardium (fig. 1). 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding to all these structures was totally inhibited in the presence of an excess (10-6 mol/liter) of unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II or Ang II and was differentially inhibited by AT1 and AT2 antagonists (figs. 1, 2, and 3). The relative density of myocardial binding sites was 2- to 3-fold greater (P < .001) in the atria (9.6 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 6.6-12.6; n = 7) compared with the ventricles (3.9 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 2.9-4.9; n = 9) and comprised both AT1 and AT2 subtypes. AT2 sites predominated, representing 77% (95% CI, 70-80) and 71% (95% CI, 58-84) of the total binding in the atrial and ventricular myocardium, respectively (fig. 2). The density of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding to the wall of coronary arteries (4.1 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 2.4-5.8; n = 6) was similar to that observed in ventricular myocardium, but AT1 sites represented 85% (95% CI, 76-94) of all the binding sites identified (figs. 2 and 3). The density of binding sites localized to nerves (30.2 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 19.6-40.8; n = 10) was 3- to 7-fold greater than that measured in the myocardium and coronary arteries, and AT1 sites comprised 96% (95% CI, 94-98) of the total binding (figs. 2 and 3). The same relative proportion of AT1 and AT2 sites was demonstrated in all the regions examined after inhibition of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding by either losartan or PD123319 (fig. 3). No binding was detected that lacked affinity for either AT1 or AT2 antagonists, and no specific 125I-Ang IV binding sites were observed. A similar distribution and density of binding sites were observed in cardiac tissues obtained from patients undergoing retransplantation due to acute or chronic allograft failure (table 1, patients 9-14), and no association was found between the distribution of specific 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites and inflammatory cell infiltration. It was not possible to distinguish between binding to myocardial and interstitial cells due to the homogeneous distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites in normal myocardium and the limited resolution of the autoradiographic technique.


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Regional distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding in left anterior descending coronary artery, epicardial nerves and myocardium in adjacent tissue sections from patients with craniocerebral trauma (A and B) or cystic fibrosis (C-F and G-I). Film autoradiographic images show total (A) and nonspecific [B; binding in the presence of 10-6 mol/liter (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II] binding to the left anterior descending coronary artery (open arrow), epicardial nerves (arrows) and adjacent myocardium (M). Photomicrographs show that the high density of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites on cardiac nerves (C) comprises mainly AT1 sites (D; binding in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter PD123319) and relatively few AT2 sites (E; binding in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter losartan). AT2 binding sites predominate in the myocardium (M), 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding (C) being inhibited to a greater extent in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter PD123319 (D) than by 10-5 mol/liter losartan (E). The wall of the coronary artery exhibits relatively low density 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding (G) and comprises mainly AT1 sites, with few binding sites being detected in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter losartan (H). N, nerve; i, intima; m, media; a, adventitia. F and I, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Bars = 2 mm (A and B) and 100 µm (C-F and G-I).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Relative density of specific 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II myocardial binding in atrium (n = 7) and ventricle (n = 9), medial layer of epicardial coronary arteries (n = 6) and nerves (n = 10) in tissue sections from hearts of patients without ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy or mitral valve disease. Data represent the mean and 95% CI of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding (250 pmol/liter; 150 min, at 20-22°C) to both AT1 and AT2 sites (Total), binding in the presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT and binding to either AT2 or AT1 sites in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter losartan (LOS) or PD123319 (PD), respectively. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding to the myocardium was significantly reduced in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter PD123319, whereas binding to coronary arteries and nerves was significantly reduced in the presence of either DTT or losartan but not PD123319. *, P < .01; **, P < .001.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Proportion of specific 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang I. I. binding to myocardium in atrium and ventricle (VENT), medial layer of coronary arteries (CA) and epicardial nerves, displaying either AT1 and AT2 binding characteristics as determined by the inhibition of binding in the presence of 10-5 mol/liter losartan (hatched columns) or PD123319 (open columns). Data represents the mean and 95% CI obtained from autoradiographic analysis of tissue sections from the hearts of patients (n = 10) without ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy or mitral valve disease.

A heterogeneous distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites was observed in sections of ventricular wall from patients with either dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease (fig. 4; table 1, patients 15-27). Areas corresponding to endocardial, interstitial, perivascular and infarcted regions (see below) displayed a significantly higher (P < .001) density of binding sites (10.8 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 8.8-12.8; n = 11) compared with that found in adjacent noninfarcted myocardium (4.2 amol·mm-2; 95% CI, 2.8-5.6; n = 10). Equilibrium binding density in noninfarcted myocardium was indistinguishable (P = .64) from that detected in microscopically normal heart tissues. The focal increase in 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding in failing explanted hearts was specifically inhibited in the presence of either 10-6 mol/liter unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II or Ang II and by 10-5 mol/liter of the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (figs. 4 and 5). The addition of the AT1 receptor-selective antagonist losartan (10-5 mol/liter) had no apparent affect, and the presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT significantly increased (P < .001) the density of binding (figs. 4 and 5). Incubation of adjacent sections of ventricle with 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II and the AT2 receptor-selective ligand 125I-CGP 42112A resulted in identical autoradiographic images, indicating the similar distribution of the binding sites (fig. 4). No specific 125I-Ang IV binding sites were demonstrated in human ventricular myocardium, although binding was observed in sections of bovine heart processed at the same time (data not shown).


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Film autoradiographic images showing the heterogeneous distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites (A-E) in serial sections of left ventricle (A-D) and interventricular septum (E and F) from patients with ischemic heart disease. Sections were incubated with 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II (250 pmol/liter; 150 min, at 20-22°C) alone (A; AT1 and AT2 sites) or with the addition of either 10-5 mol/liter PD123319 (B; AT1 sites), 10-5 mol/liter losartan (C; AT2 sites) or 10 mmol/liter DTT (D; AT2 sites). Except for nerves (A and B; arrows), areas displaying a relatively high density of binding sites corresponded to endocardial, perivascular, interstitial and infarcted regions and exhibited AT2 receptor binding characteristics. Film autoradiographic images also show the similar distribution of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites (E) and the AT2 receptor-selective ligand 125I-CGP 42112A (F). Bars = 2 mm.   


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Quantitative analysis of equilibrium 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding (250 pmol/liter; 150 min, at 20-22°C) to sections of ventricle from patients with either ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. The density of binding sites in endocardial, perivascular, interstitial and infarcted regions (A) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that detected in the rest of the myocardium (B). The density of ligand binding in these regions was significantly enhanced in the presence of DTT (10 mmol/liter), inhibited in the presence of PD123319 (10-5 mol/liter) and unchanged by losartan (10-5 mol/liter)., indicating that it comprised mainly AT2 sites. Data points represent the mean and 95% CI of binding to sections from 11 distinct patients. ***, P < .001; **, P < .01; *, P < .05.

A similar focal increase in 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites was observed in the ventricular wall of patients with either dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease and was further characterized by association and equilibrium binding studies. The association of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding reached an apparent equilibrium within 150 min at 20° to 22°C (fig. 6). No significant difference was observed in binding density after reapplication of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II to fresh serial sections, at 20° to 22°C, indicating that ligand integrity was maintained during incubation at this temperature (data not shown). Equilibrium binding studies confirmed that the binding was of high affinity and saturable, with a Kd value of 0.57 nmol/liter (95% CI, 0.25-0.89) and a Bmax value of 52.9 amol·mm-2 (95% CI, 37.6-68.1), and nonspecific binding represented <10% of the total binding (fig. 6). Binding was specifically inhibited by coincubation with either unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II or Ang II and by the AT2 receptor-selective compounds CGP 42112A, [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II and PD123319 but not by losartan and eprosartan (fig. 7). Nonlinear regression analysis of this data was best fitted to a one-site model and demonstrated significant differences in the potency of the inhibitors, with a rank order of CGP 4211 > (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II > Ang II > [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II > PD123319, characteristic of binding to AT2 sites (table 2). The cellular localization and equilibrium constants of ligand binding sites in noninfarcted myocardium could not be reliably determined due to the limited resolution of the autoradiographic technique and the comparatively low density of binding. The relative proportion of AT1 and AT2 binding sites detected in noninfarcted ventricular myocardium was, however, similar to that demonstrated in the normal heart, with AT2 sites representing 76% (95% CI, 66-86) and AT1 sites representing 23% (95% CI, 13-33) of the total.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Association (A) and saturation (B) analysis of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding to endocardial, perivascular, interstitial and infarcted regions in sections of ventricle from patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. Each point represents the mean and 95% CI of binding to sections from six distinct hearts, expressed either as the percentage of maximum specific binding (A) or (B) total (square ), nonspecific (open circle ) and specific (black-square) ligand binding (amol·mm-2).   


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Competitive inhibition of binding to endocardial, perivascular, interstitial and infarcted regions in sections of ventricle from patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. Binding studies were conducted in the presence of 250 pmol/liter. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II (150 min, at 20-22°C) and increasing concentrations of nonselective (sar1,Ile8)Ang II, Ang II), AT2-selective (CGP 42112A, [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II, PD123319) and AT1-selective competitors (losartan, eprosartan). Each point represents the mean of binding to sections from six distinct hearts, expressed as the percentage of maximum specific binding.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Inhibition of specific [125I](Sar1, Ile8) Ang II binding

Microautoradiography showed that the increase in AT2 binding sites, observed in explanted failing hearts, was localized to endocardial, perivascular, interstitial and infarcted regions, corresponding to areas of fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, as demonstrated by picrosirius red staining (fig. 8). A selective increase in AT2 binding sites was found in atria, as well as ventricles, from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease, and a corresponding heterogeneous distribution of AT2 binding sites was observed in atrial and ventricular tissues obtained from two other patients: one with adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy (table 1, patient 28) and the other with mitral valve disease (table 1, patient 29).


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Photomicrographs of serial sections of interventricular septum from a patient with ischemic heart disease, showing the localization of AT2 binding sites (A; 250 pmol/liter. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding in the presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT). Compared with the myocardium (m), perivascular (*, arteriole) and infarcted regions (open arrows) contain a high density of binding sites (A), prominent picrosirius red staining (B) and a moderate number of fibroblasts (C; hematoxylin and eosin). Bar = 100 µm.

Comparative distribution of AT2 and ACE binding sites. 125I-351A bound specifically to the coronary vascular endothelium in arteries, arterioles and microvessels and was completely inhibited in the presence of either 1 mmol/liter EDTA or 10-5 mol/liter lisinopril. 125I-351A binding was observed in both noninfarcted myocardium and infarcted areas, with the latter corresponding to the regions exhibiting a high density of AT2 binding sites (fig. 9). A differential distribution of vascular ACE and AT2 binding sites was demonstrated using microautoradiography, with 125I-351A and 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding being mainly localized to the endothelial and adventitial layers of the vessel wall, respectively (fig. 9). In contrast to the high density of silver grains overlying the vascular endothelium, relatively few specific 125I-351A binding sites were detected either on the endocardium or the other regions that displayed 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding characteristic of AT2 sites (fig. 9). The distribution of 125I-351A binding corresponded with that of CD31-immunoreactive endothelium in small arteries, arterioles and microvessels, and the border zone between infarcted areas and noninfarcted myocardium characteristically contained numerous microvessels, exhibiting 125I-351A binding to the vessel wall and perivascular AT2 binding sites (fig. 10).


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Regional distribution of AT2 binding sites (A, C, and F; 250 pmol/liter. 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding in the presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT) and ACE (B, D, and G; 125I-351A binding) in serial sections of left ventricle from a patient with ischemic heart disease (A and B), right ventricle from a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (C-E) and interventricular septum from a patient with ischemic heart disease (F-H). Film autoradiograms demonstrate that infarcted regions, surrounding islands of noninfarcted myocardium (m), exhibit both AT2 (A) and ACE binding sites (B). ACE binding was also present in noninfarcted myocardium but was not detected in avascular scar tissue (s). At the microscopic level, AT2 binding sites were localized to endocardium (C; arrowheads), perivascular and infarcted regions (F; open arrows). In contrast, 125I-351A binding was localized mainly to vascular endothelium in small arteries, arterioles (*) and microvessels (D and F; arrows), rather than the endocardium (F; arrowheads). E and H, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Bars = 2 mm (A and B) and 100 µm (C-E and F-H).


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Photomicrographs of serial sections of left ventricle from a patient with mitral valve disease, showing microvessels in the border zone between scar tissue and noninfarcted myocardium. Vessels (arrows) display both immunostaining for the endothelial marker PECAM (A) and 125I-351A binding to endothelial ACE (B) and are surrounded by perivascular AT2 binding sites [C; 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding in the presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT; open arrows]. Bar = 100 µm.

AT2 receptor expression. Specific products corresponding to human AT2 receptor cDNA sequences were generated by RT-PCR from both atrial and ventricular tissue samples and the expression of the gene displayed alternative splicing of 5' untranslated exons (fig. 11). Two AT2 receptor transcripts were found, with the identity of each being confirmed by direct cycle sequencing. A 507-bp fragment encoding exons 1, 2 and 3 predominated, and a 448-bp fragment encoding exons 1 and 3 was also detected. Expression of the AT2 receptor gene was confirmed by Northern blot analysis of mRNA isolated from ventricle tissues of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic heart disease, with a single approx 3-kb band being demonstrated (fig. 11).


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   AT2 receptor gene expression in human cardiac tissues. Specific products, corresponding to AT2 receptor cDNA sequences (507 and 448 bp), were detected autoradiographically, after RT-PCR amplification, in samples of atrium (A; lanes 3-5) and ventricle (A; lanes 6 and 7). Lane 1, DNA size markers; lane 2, control amplification in absence of cDNA. The presence of AT2 transcripts (approx 3 kb) was confirmed by Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA, as illustrated in samples of left ventricle from patients with ischemic heart disease (B).

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The present data indicate that the human heart contains two populations of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites, displaying characteristics of AT1 and AT2 receptors, and the relative density and proportion of these two binding sites varies according to the specific structures that bear them. We have shown that 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites are differentially distributed in the human heart and that the AT2 subtype predominates in the myocardium of both the normal and failing heart, representing 70% to 77% of the specific binding sites identified. This subtype occurred throughout the myocardium and was relatively more numerous in the atria than the ventricles. A selective increase in AT2 binding sites was observed in the ventricular myocardium of explanted failing hearts from patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy and localized to endocardial, interstitial, perivascular and infarcted regions, corresponding to sites of collagen deposition and fibroblast proliferation. In contrast, a homogeneous population of AT1 binding sites was localized to nerves and, albeit at relatively low density, in coronary vessels, as well as in the myocardium.

The two 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites were distinguished on the basis of differences in their respective affinity for the AT1 and AT2 nonpeptide antagonists losartan and PD123319 and their sensitivity to DTT. Specific high affinity AT2 sites displayed a similar distribution pattern to binding sites for the AT2 receptor-selective ligand 125I- CGP 42112A and were further characterized by competitive inhibition experiments. The rank order of inhibitory potency of peptide analogs and nonpeptide antagonists for 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites in the failing human heart (CGP 42112A > (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II > Ang II > [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II > PD123319 >> >> losartan = eprosartan) corresponded to that exhibited by the AT2 receptor in other mammalian tissues (Iimmermans, et al., 1993) and by the cloned human AT2 receptor expressed in vitro (Martin et al., 1994; Tsuzuki et al., 1994). The identification of cardiac 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites as either AT1 or AT2 receptors was verified by demonstrating well established differences in the sensitivity of the two receptors to DTT (Chui et al., 1989; Nozawa et al., 1994; Whitbread et al., 1989), with ligand binding to AT1 sites being inhibited by DTT, whereas binding to AT2 sites was increased. Finally, expression of the AT2 receptor gene in human cardiac tissues was confirmed at the molecular level by the demonstration of a specific approx 3-kb AT2 mRNA transcript in both atrial and ventricular tissues, corresponding in size to that demonstrated in other human tissues (Koike et al., 1994).

The proportion of AT2 binding sites determined autoradiographically in both normal and noninfarcted myocardium in failing explanted hearts corresponds with that found in radioligand binding studies using atrial and ventricular myocardial membrane preparations from normal individuals and patients with impaired cardiac function or end-stage heart failure due to ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy (Nozawa et al., 1994; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995; Rogg et al., 1996). Rogg et al. (1996) also demonstrated that the proportion of AT1 and AT2 receptors in the right atrial myocardium, from patients with normal or moderately impaired cardiac function, correlates with atrial pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction, but the tissue distribution of the receptor subtypes was not determined. Our data, together with the recent observations of Brink et al. (1996) on atrial appendage tissues, indicate that changes in the proportion of cardiac Ang II receptor subtypes are associated with disease-related differences in cardiac structure, with a selective increase in AT2 receptor binding occurring in regions of fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition in the hearts of patients with ischemic heart disease, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, mitral valve disease and adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. These observations are in contrast to those obtained in experimental models of heart disease, for example, after myocardial infarction in the rat, where we (Lefroy et al., 1996) and others (Sun and Weber, 1994) have demonstrated a marked increase in specific AT1 binding sites in regions of fibrosis and collagen deposition. The present observations therefore serve to further emphasize the fact that there are species differences in both the regulation and proportion of cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors.

Although the functional significance of the human cardiac AT2 receptor has yet to be established, the receptor has been shown to mediate distinct Ang II-induced effects in a variety of cell types, influencing, for example, collagen metabolism in cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts (Brilla et al., 1994). Several studies have also demonstrated an antigrowth role for the AT2 receptor in the cardiovascular system, inhibiting the proliferation of rat coronary endothelial cells (Stoll et al., 1995) and transfected vascular smooth muscle cells (Nakajima et al., 1995), inhibiting arterial hypertrophy and fibrosis in Ang II-induced hypertensive rats (Levy et al., 1996) and opposing Ang II-induced growth of cultured neonatal rat myocytes (Booz and Baker, 1996). The cellular expression of the AT2 receptor is growth dependent (Kijima et al., 1996; Yamada et al., 1996), and apoptosis represents one mechanism by which it may induce an antigrowth effect (Yamada et al., 1996). Indeed, apoptotic myocytes have been found to occur relatively frequently in the border zone of infarcted human heart tissues (Saraste et al., 1997), and it has been speculated that the AT2 receptor may influence changes in myocardial structure by mediating apoptosis (Dzau and Horiuchi, 1996). Our observations indicate that the tissue-selective distribution pattern of AT2 receptor expression in the failing human heart is common to a number of cardiac diseases in which there is myocardial infarction and fibrosis, suggesting that it is not a primary event specific to a particular disease but rather that it represents part of a general mechanism contributing to disease-related changes in myocardial structure.

The distribution of 125I-351A binding sites corresponds with immunohistochemical localization of ACE immunoreactivity to the vascular endothelium in the human heart (Danilov et al., 1987; Falkenhahn et al., 1995; Hokimoto et al., 1996). Increased ACE activity has been reported to occur in human ventricular myocardium after myocardial infarction (Hokimoto et al., 1995, 1996) and increased ACE mRNA levels detected in the failing explanted hearts of patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy (Studer et al., 1994; Zisman et al., 1995). The distribution of 125I-351A binding demonstrated in the present study, together with the immunohistochemical observations of Falkenhahn et al. (1995), indicate that the vascular endothelium is also the main site of cardiac ACE expression in the failing human heart, with 125I-351A binding and ACE immunoreactivity being prominent in the vessels that proliferate in the border zone between infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium. Although cardiac myocytes and interstitial cells in the failing heart displayed relatively little 125I-351A binding, the extent to which nonendothelial cells may exhibit ACE activity requires further investigation, particularly as recent immunohistochemical studies have provided conflicting information concerning the localization of ACE immunoreactivity after myocardial infarction (Falkenham et al., 1995; Hokimoto et al., 1996) and its distribution has not been determined by immunohistochemistry in cardiac tissues from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or other forms of heart disease.

Clinical trials have provided unequivocal evidence that ACE inhibitor therapy has a beneficial effect on patients with heart failure due to ischemic or nonischemic forms of heart disease, notably dilated cardiomyopathy, relieving symptoms and prolonging survival (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996; Pfeffer et al., 1995). ACE inhibitor therapy also appears to have a beneficial effect on patients with epirubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (Jensen et al., 1996); however, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of ACE inhibitors remain incompletely understood. The inhibition of ACE is not specific for Ang II production because it influences the metabolism of other peptides, notably bradykinin, which may contribute to its vasodilator and growth-inhibiting properties (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996; Pfeffer et al., 1995). In addition, an alternative ACE-independent pathway for the generation of Ang II, by chymase, exists in the human heart (Urata et al., 1990), with chymase-like immunoreactivity being localized to interstitial cells, as well as endothelial and mast cells, in the ventricular myocardium of the failing human heart (Urata et al., 1993). Nevertheless, recent studies have indicated that ACE rather than chymase is the predominant pathway responsible for the local generation of Ang II in the human (Studer et al., 1994; Zisman et al., 1995). Regardless of the pathways involved in the generation of Ang II in the heart, Ang II receptor subtypes represent a direct means of influencing Ang II-induced changes in the growth and structure of the myocardium and thereby its contribution to the progression of heart failure. Experimentally, the AT1 receptor appears to mediate many of the known growth-related changes induced by Ang II in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts and myocytes (Crabos et al., 1994; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993; Schorb et al., 1993; Villarreal et al., 1993), and treatment of animals with an AT1 receptor antagonist attenuates most of the growth-related changes identified in the hypertrophic heart, including a reduction in cardiac size, DNA proliferation in interstitial cells and collagen deposition (Kojima et al., 1994; Makino et al., 1996; Nakamura et al., 1994; Schiefer et al., 1994; Smits et al., 1992; Suzuki et al., 1993). Clinically, AT1 receptor antagonists have also been shown to block the pressor response to Ang II, reduce elevated blood pressure and exert beneficial hemodynamic effects in heart failure (Awan and Mason, 1996; Goodfriend et al., 1996; Johnston, 1995). However, it remains to be seen whether AT1 receptor antagonists will influence human ventricular hypertrophy, reproducing the results obtained in experimental animals, and display the same reduction in mortality and morbidity associated with ACE inhibitors. Furthermore, AT1 receptor blockade increases Ang II levels in humans and might therefore indirectly induce AT2 receptor mediated responses (Awan and Mason, 1996; Goodfriend et al., 1996; Johnston, 1995).

Study limitations. Due to limited resolution of the autoradiographic technique and the homogeneous distribution of relatively low density myocardial 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites, the cellular resolution of AT1 and AT2 sites in normal and noninfarcted human myocardium remains unclear. Ultrastructural examination of ligand binding sites and immunohistochemical studies, using antibodies selective for AT1 or AT2 receptors, represent possible alternative strategies for the cellular resolution of Ang II receptor subtypes in human myocardium in situ. Several studies have used isolated rat myocytes and cardiac fibroblasts to investigate the cellular localization of Ang II receptor subtypes (Crabos et al., 1994; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993; Schorb et al., 1993; Villarreal et al., 1993), but the relevance of their findings to humans is uncertain in view of species differences in the cardiac expression of Ang II receptors. In addition, cultured cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts exhibit differential expression and regulation of Ang II receptor genes (Matsubara et al., 1994), and results obtained using isolated cardiac cells may be confounded by the apparent plasticity of AT2 receptor gene expression. The proportion of cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors expressed in situ in the rat heart has, for example, been found to vary from that detected in cultured cells (Feolde et al., 1994), possibly reflecting down-regulation of AT2 receptor expression after the isolation of mammalian cells (Johnson and Aguilera, 1991; Villarreal et al., 1993) and the growth-dependent regulation of AT2 receptor expression in cultured cells (Kijima et al., 1996; Yamada et al., 1996). Similarly, the results of ligand binding studies on human heart tissues appear to differ from those obtained with isolated cardiac cells. Although AT2 binding sites predominate in both tissue sections and myocardial membrane preparations of the human heart, cultured human cardiac fibroblasts are reported to display AT1 rather than AT2 receptor-mediated effects on collagen synthesis (Brilla et al., 1995). Atypical Ang II binding sites have also been detected, albeit transiently, on cultured human cardiac fibroblasts, which internalize Ang1-7 and Ang II, but not Ang3-8, and influence DNA synthesis (Neubeta et al., 1994, 1996). Further atypical Ang II binding sites, displaying high affinity for Ang3-8 (Ang IV) and low affinity for losartan and PD123319, have been identified on rabbit cardiac fibroblasts (Wang et al., 1995) and myocardial membranes of guinea pig and rabbit heart (Hanesworth et al., 1993), but they have not been described in the human heart in situ, and in the present study no specific 125I-Ang IV binding sites were detected in the cardiac tissues examined.

Our autoradiographic observations, together with the results of studies on human myocardial membrane preparations (Nozawa et al., 1994; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995; Rogg et al., 1996), indicate that the specific Ang II binding sites identified in human atrial and ventricular tissues correspond to AT1 and AT2 receptors. Although the expression of atypical Ang II receptors in the human heart is uncertain, heterogeneity among both cardiac AT1 and AT2 receptors cannot be excluded. Two subtypes of the AT1 receptor, AT1a and AT1b, are encoded in the human genome, which are differentially expressed in human tissues (Konishi et al., 1994), and heterogeneity has been detected among mammalian AT2 receptors (Siemens et al., 1994). Our data suggest that like the AT1 receptor (Curnow et al., 1995), expression of the human AT2 receptor may be subject to alternative splicing of mRNA transcripts, but it is unknown whether this also leads to differences in the translation of the receptor mRNA or it is influenced by heart disease.

An additional limitation of the present study is that many of the tissues examined were obtained from patients receiving ACE inhibitors, as well as other drugs, before transplantation, and this may have influenced the cardiac distribution of ACE and Ang II receptors. On the other hand, the long-term administration of ACE inhibitors to rats after myocardial infarction has not been associated with a change in cardiac ACE activity (Wollert et al., 1994), and studies on human tissues have indicated no significant differences in either the cardiac expression of ACE (Studer et al., 1994) or the distribution of Ang II receptors (Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995; Rogg et al., 1996) in patients treated with or without ACE inhibitors. The differential distribution of AT2 binding sites demonstrated in the present study was also associated with disease-related changes in myocardial structure and not with whether the patients were receiving an ACE inhibitor.

In conclusion, the predominance of the AT2 receptor in the human heart and the selective increase in this receptor in patients with ischemic heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, and other forms of heart disease suggest that this receptor may be relatively more important in humans than in experimental animals. In addition to being a potential therapeutic target, the tissue-specific localization of the cardiac AT2 receptor and availability of nonpeptide AT2 receptor antagonists raise the possibility of being able to monitor disease- and drug-related changes in cardiac morphology.

    Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. R. D. Smith (DuPont Merck, Wilmington, DE) for supplying losartan (DuP 753); Dr. J. B. Reese (SmithKline Beecham, Collegeville, PA) for supplying eprosartan (SKF-108566), Dr. J. A. Keiser (Parke-Davis, Ann Arbor, MI) for supplying PD 123319; and Dr. M. Hitchens (Merck Sharp and Dohme Laboratories, West Point, PA) for supplying 351A.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 5, 1997.

Received for publication March 13, 1997.

1 This work was supported by a grant from the British Heart Foundation (PG/95017).

Send reprint requests to: Dr. John Wharton, Department of Histochemistry, Imperial College School of Medicine, The Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK. E-mail: jwharton{at}rpms.ac.uk

    Abbreviations

ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; Ang II, angiotensin II; Ang IV, hexapeptide fragment 3-8 of angiotensin II; DTT, dithiothreitol; PECAM, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule; CI, confidence interval; RT, reverse transcription; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References