![]() |
|
|
Vol. 284, Issue 1, 250-257, 1998
-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor-Gated Chloride Ion Channel
in Adult Rat Offspring1
Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined the effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on
-aminobutyric
acid (GABA)-stimulated 36Cl
flux.
Sprague-Dawley rat dams were fed either a liquid diet containing 5%
ethanol, pair-fed an isocalorically equivalent 0% ethanol diet or rat
chow ad libitum throughout gestation. Membrane vesicles were prepared from medial frontal cortex, cerebellum and hippocampal formation of adult offspring in each diet group. GABA-stimulated 36Cl
flux was not significantly affected by
prenatal ethanol exposure in any of the three brain regions examined.
Positive allosteric modulation of GABA-stimulated
36Cl
flux by flunitrazepam or alphaxalone, as
well as negative modulation by FG-7142 or pregnenolone, were all
diminished in medial frontal cortex of 5% ethanol diet offspring
compared with both ad libitum and pair-fed control
groups. In cerebellum, prenatal ethanol exposure attenuated the
modulatory effects of both benzodiazepines, but did not affect
neurosteroid modulation. In hippocampus, prenatal ethanol exposure
enhanced the effects of flunitrazepam and alphaxalone, whereas negative
modulatory effects were either decreased (FG-7142) or unchanged
(pregnenolone). These results indicate that moderate ethanol
consumption during gestation can produce long-lasting alterations in
neuromodulatory influences on GABAA receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission in adult offspring. In hippocampal formation, the heightened sensitivity to positive modulatory influences may contribute to synaptic plasticity deficits in fetal ethanol-exposed rat offspring. We speculate that these prenatal ethanol-induced changes
may be either a consequence of differential GABAA receptor subunit expression or receptor uncoupling in different brain regions. Furthermore, offspring exposed to ethanol in utero may
display differential sensitivities to benzodiazepines and possibly
other centrally active therapeutic agents.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
developing brain is extremely sensitive to the effects of ethanol
(Abel, 1984
; West and Pierce, 1986
). Heavy consumption of ethanol
during pregnancy can result in a set of profound morphological and
neurological aberrations called fetal alcohol syndrome (Lemoine et al., 1968
; Jones and Smith, 1973
; Jones et
al., 1973
; Clarren and Smith, 1978
). Further, there is a growing
appreciation for the concern that moderate ethanol consumption may
cause subtle, long-term impairments in the absence of the gross
morphological or neurological defects associated with FAS (Shaywitz
et al., 1980
; Abel, 1984
). For example, moderate ethanol
exposure in utero causes cognitive deficits in children
which may not become apparent until the child is challenged during the
educational years (Streissguth et al., 1990
; Conry, 1990)
and may increase in severity as the child matures (Streissguth et
al., 1991
, 1994
). Recognition of this problem led to the
recommendation that the diagnostic classification of fetal
alcohol-related defects be expanded to include a new category called
alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders (ARND; Stratton et
al., 1996
).
Although the mechanisms underlying cognition and cognitive deficits are
complex and involve many systems, increasing evidence indicates that
the hippocampal formation (Milner, 1965
; DeJong et al.,
1969
; Olton and Pappas, 1979
; Zola-Morgan et al., 1986
) and
the glutamate neurotransmitter system (Morris et al., 1986
; Morris, 1989
) participate in the process of memory formation. The
neurobiological implications of the subtle, but perhaps more pervasive
effects of moderate prenatal ethanol exposure on cognition prompted our
investigation of the effects of moderate ethanol consumption during
pregnancy on amino acid neurotransmitter systems in hippocampal
formation and other brain regions associated with learning in adult
offspring. Previous studies suggest that these cognitive deficits may,
in part, be linked to multiple abnormalities in hippocampal glutamate
neurotransmission of fetal alcohol-exposed offspring, including reduced
hippocampal glutamate receptor (Farr et al., 1988a
), kainate
receptor (Farr et al., 1988b
) and NMDA receptor binding
(Savage et al., 1991
, 1992
; Abdollah and Brien, 1995
) and
functional deficits in hippocampal NMDA neurotransmission (Morrisett
et al., 1989
; Weaver et al., 1993
). In addition
to changes in the ionotropic NMDA receptor, we also have observed decreased activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor-stimulated phosphoinositol hydrolysis (Queen et al., 1993
). These
changes may underlie a diminished capacity to elicit glutamate
receptor-dependent electrophysiological phenomena such as long-term
potentiation (Swartzwelder et al., 1988
; Tan et
al., 1990
; Sutherland et al., 1997
). Furthermore, the
neurochemical changes in fetal alcohol-exposed rats may contribute to
deficits in animal learning behaviors sensitive to hippocampal
glutamate receptor antagonism. Prenatal ethanol-exposed rats exhibit
performance deficits in spatial navigation tasks (Blanchard et
al., 1987
; Kelly et al., 1988
; Gianoulakis, 1990
) and
in one-trial fear-conditioning responses (R. Sutherland, D. Savage, R. McDonald and M. Weisend, unpublished observations). Taken together,
these changes suggest that altered NMDA receptor-mediated glutamate
neurotransmission is one teratological consequence of prenatal ethanol
exposure which contributes to learning disabilities in fetal
alcohol-exposed children.
The effect of prenatal ethanol exposure on inhibitory influences of
GABA neurotransmission has received less attention thus far. In a
single study, specific [3H]muscimol binding to
GABAA receptors was elevated by 11% to 22% in
various subfields of the hippocampal formation of fetal ethanol-exposed offspring compared with controls (Savage and Swartzwelder, 1992
). These
changes were not statistically significant and a subsequent saturation
of binding study indicated no change in the total number of specific
[3H]muscimol binding sites
(Bmax). These results suggested that modest
elevations in [3H]muscimol binding in prenatal
ethanol-exposed offspring may be caused by subtle changes in factors
affecting the affinity of GABAA receptors for
binding agonists.
One putative mechanism for subtle alterations in
[3H]muscimol binding may be changes in the
allosteric modulatory influences that affect the
GABAA receptor affinity and function. It is now well established that several classes of compounds, including various
benzodiazepines (Obata et al., 1988
; Pritchett et
al., 1989
), barbiturates (Allan and Harris, 1986a
; Olsen et
al., 1986
), neurosteroids (Gee et al., 1988
; Puia
et al., 1990
) and ethanol (Allan and Harris, 1986b
; Aguayo,
1990
) exhibit allosteric modulatory influences on
GABAA receptors in different brain regions. Using GABAA receptor-stimulated
36Cl
flux as a marker of
GABAA receptor function, we tested the hypothesis that maternal consumption of moderate amounts of ethanol throughout gestation alters the allosteric modulation of
GABAA receptor function in adult offspring. GABA
dose-response curve studies and an assessment of the effects of
positive and negative modulators acting either at the benzodiazepine or
neurosteroid recognition sites were conducted in the medial frontal
cortex, cerebellum and hippocampal formation of adult rat offspring
whose mothers had consumed either rat chow ad libitum,
pair-fed a 0% ethanol liquid diet or a 5% ethanol liquid diet.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ethanol liquid diet paradigm. Five-month-old Sprague-Dawley rat dams (Harlan Industries, Indianapolis, IN) were individually housed in plastic cages in a temperature-controlled room (22°C) on a 16 hr dark:8 hr light schedule (lights off from 5:30 P.M. to 9:30 A.M.). Beginning on day 1 of gestation, rat dams were placed in one of three diet groups. Two of the three diets consisted of a liquid diet based on the Lieber-DeCarli (1982) formulation (BioServ, Frenchtown, NJ). One group received liquid diet containing 5% (v/v) ethanol (26% ethanol-derived calories). This group received 110 ml of 5% ethanol liquid diet at 5:30 P.M. each day. The feeding tubes were removed 16 hr later (at 9:30 A.M. on the next morning), and water bottles were placed on the cages. The other liquid diet group, serving as pair-fed control, was given a 0% ethanol liquid diet (isocalorically equivalent to the 5% ethanol diet) for 16 hr each day. A third diet group had continuous access to Purina breeder block chow and water ad libitum and served as control for the paired feeding technique. Rat dams were maintained on these diets throughout gestation. At birth, all litters were weighed, culled to 10 pups and cross-fostered onto surrogate untreated dams. Rat pups were weaned at 30 days of age and maintained on lab chow and water ad libitum.
Blood ethanol determinations.
Maternal blood ethanol
concentrations produced by consumption of the 5% ethanol liquid diet
were determined in a separate set of dams. The food intake in these
additional dams was matched to the daily volume of food ingested by the
dams that produced the offspring used in the
36chloride ion flux experiments described below.
Blood samples were taken at 11:30 P.M., 6 hr after the
introduction of the food tubes. This time point was selected for
sampling because peak maternal blood ethanol concentrations occur about
an hour after the peak period of liquid diet consumption (data not
shown). Blood samples were collected from each dam every other evening
during the third week of gestation for a total of three collections per
rat dam. A 0.1-ml whole-blood sample was collected from the tail vein
and immediately mixed with 0.2 ml of 6.6% perchloric acid and stored frozen at
20°C until assayed. Blood ethanol standards were created by mixing rat whole blood from untreated rats with known amounts of
ethanol ranging from 0 to 240 mg/dl and then mixing 0.1-ml aliquots of
each standard with perchloric acid and storing the standards frozen
with the samples. Blood ethanol samples were assayed by a modification
of the method of Lundquist (1959)
. The ethanol standard curve was
linear over the 0 to 240 mg/dl range. Sample blood ethanol values were
determined by regression analysis. Because the dams consumed similar
quantities of food each night during the third week of gestation, the
blood ethanol data collected from all three sessions was combined for
all rat dams sampled.
Preparation of brain membranes (microsacs).
Brain membrane
vesicles (microsacs) were prepared as described by Allan and Harris
(1986a)
. A total of six 5-month-old female offspring (two each from
three separate litters) were used from each of the three experimental
diet groups. Rats were sacrificed by decapitation, the brain rapidly
removed and the medial frontal cortex, cerebellum and hippocampal
formation were dissected out on ice. The area identified as the medial
frontal cortex included the infralimbic cortex, cingulate cortex,
medial, lateral and ventral orbital cortex and agranular insular
cortex, according to the Paxinos and Watson atlas (1986). Dissected
tissue was homogenized gently by hand with a Dounce homogenizer in
assay buffer (145 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl,
1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, pH 7.5 at
25°C with Tris) containing protease inhibitors (0.05 mg/ml calpain
inhibitor I and II, 0.02 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, 2 µg/ml aprotinin,
1 µg/ml leupeptin). The homogenate was washed twice by centrifugation
(700 × gav for 15 min) and
resuspended in assay buffer with protease inhibitors to a final
concentration of 1 to 2 mg/ml as determined by a modification of the
method of Lowry et al. (1951)
as described by Markwell
et al. (1981)
.
GABAA-stimulated
36chloride ion flux.
Uptake of
36chloride ion into brain microsacs was initiated
by the addition of assay buffer containing 0.2 mCi/ml
36chloride ion to the microsac preparation and
followed for a total of 3 sec. Basal flux was measured as the amount of
36chloride ion taken up in the absence of added
GABA. In the GABA dose-response studies, five different concentrations
of GABA (0, 10, 25, 50 or 100 µM) were incubated with microsacs. In
the allosteric modulation of GABA-stimulated
36chloride ion flux studies, microsacs were
incubated with one of four modulatory agents: flunitrazepam (25 nM),
FG-7142 (10 nM), alphaxalone (25 µM) or pregnenolone sulfate (25 µM). The concentration of each modulator used was a concentration
previously determined to be approximately half-maximally effective
(Allan et al., 1991
; A. Allan, H. Wu and S. Engel,
unpublished observations). GABA (25 µM) was added to tubes containing
the positive modulators (flunitrazepam or alphaxalone) and 100 µM
GABA was added to the tubes containing the negative modulators (FG-7142
or pregnenolone). Flux was terminated by the addition of assay buffer
containing the GABAA receptor antagonist,
bicuculline (75 µM), and the chloride channel antagonist, picrotoxin
(100 µM). Samples were immediately filtered under vacuum and counted
by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. Each assay condition was run in
triplicate. The amount of 36chloride ion flux
under basal (no added GABA) condition was subtracted out of all the
other determinations. Data are expressed as nanomoles of
36chloride ion per milligram of protein. GABA
dose-response data were analyzed by an overall two-factor (3 × 4)
ANOVA. Data from the modulation studies were analyzed by one-way ANOVA
followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls post hoc tests where
appropriate.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fetal ethanol exposure paradigm.
Table
1 summarizes rat dam caloric intake,
ethanol consumption and maternal blood ethanol concentration data along
with the impact of these diets on litter size and offspring birth
weight. Rat dams assigned to the pair-fed and 5% ethanol liquid diet
group consumed an average of 87 kcal/day (table 1). The rat dams in these groups consumed approximately 92% of the daily caloric
requirement for 250-g rat dams (Altman and Dittmer, 1974
). This modest
reduction in daily caloric intake had no significant effect on
offspring outcome measures compared with the ad libitum chow
control group (described below).
|
Dose-dependent GABA-stimulated 36chloride
ion flux.
Increasing concentrations of added GABA produced a
dose-dependent increase in 36chloride ion flux in
medial frontal cortex (fig. 1A),
cerebellum (fig. 1B) and hippocampal formation (fig. 1C).
GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux was highest
in the medial frontal cortex, followed by the hippocampal formation and
the cerebellum. These data are similar to previous studies of
36chloride ion flux measurements (Allan et
al., 1991
). 36Chloride ion flux continued to
increase at 100 µM, preventing calculation of
Emax and EC50 values.
Concentrations greater than 100 µM were not run because of the
limited amount of available tissue. Ideally, full dose-response
relationships for these modulatory drugs would have been analyzed.
However, we felt that, for this evaluation, the GABA dose-response
relationship along with the effects of the modulatory agents should be
measured within the same tissue preparation. Thus, we were only able to
evaluate the effects of each of the four modulatory agents at a single
concentration previously determined to be the half-maximally effective
concentration (Allan et al., 1991
; A. Allan, H. Wu and S. Engel, unpublished observations).
|
Modulation of GABA-stimulated 36chloride flux. Each of the four neuromodulatory agents altered GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux in all three brain regions studied in control rats. In the medial frontal cortex and the cerebellum, the positive modulators flunitrazepam and alphaxalone increased 36chloride ion flux to the levels achieved with maximally stimulating concentrations of GABA, whereas the negative modulators FG-7142 and pregnenolone sulfate reduced GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux to levels measured in the absence of added GABA (figs. 2 and 3). In the hippocampal formation, the negative modulators had a similar effect on GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux. In contrast to the other brain regions, however, the positive modulators produced only a modest increase in GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux in the hippocampal formation (fig. 4).
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prenatal ethanol exposure to relatively moderate maternal blood
ethanol concentrations (83 mg/dl) produced long-lasting alterations on
the neuromodulatory influences affecting GABAA
receptor-mediated neurotransmission (figs. 2, 3 and 4). These changes
occurred without altering the capacity of GABA to stimulate
36chloride ion flux as measured in our 3-sec
assay system (fig. 1). Furthermore, these changes occurred in the
absence of any of the gross morphological or neurological deficits
associated with FAS, which are observed to some degree when rat fetuses
or neonates are exposed to higher blood ethanol concentrations (West and Pierce, 1986
).
The 36chloride flux studies in hippocampal
formation (fig. 1C) are consistent with in vitro receptor
autoradiography studies on the impact of prenatal ethanol exposure on
[3H]muscimol binding in adult rat offspring
(Savage and Swartzwelder, 1992
). The
[3H]muscimol binding studies revealed no
significant change in total GABAA receptor
number, which is consistent with overlapping GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux curves among the three diet
groups (fig. 1C). When brain sections were incubated with a
half-maximally saturating concentration of
[3H]muscimol, modest (11-22%) increases in
specific [3H]muscimol binding were observed in
the hippocampal dentate gyrus stratum moleculare of fetal
ethanol-exposed rats compared with ad libitum and pair-fed
controls (Savage and Swartzwelder, 1992
). In light of the results shown
in figure 4, one explanation for a modest
[3H]muscimol binding site elevation may be a
heightened GABAA receptor sensitivity to an
endogenous positive neuromodulatory substance or a lessened sensitivity
to a negative modulator present in the histological section of brain
during the binding assay incubation procedure.
The molecular basis for alterations in the modulation of
GABAA receptor function in prenatal
ethanol-expose offspring is not known. However, the long-lasting
effects of prenatal ethanol exposure in the medial frontal cortex and
cerebellum of adult offspring reported in this study are reminiscent of
the effects of chronic exposure to ethanol or other modulators of
GABAA receptor function. Chronic administration
of ethanol (Morrow et al., 1990
; Buck et al.,
1991
), benzodiazepines (Allan et al., 1992
), barbiturates (Yu and Ticku, 1995c
) or neurosteroid compounds (Yu and Ticku, 1995a
,
b
) diminishes GABAA receptor sensitivity to these
modulatory agents. Similarly, chronic benzodiazepine administration
reduced the apparent coupling between the benzodiazepine agonist site and the chloride channel and increased the apparent coupling between the channel and the inverse agonist site (Allan et al.,
1992
). Five-day treatment of cerebral cortical cultures with
5
-pregnane-3
-ol-20-one (5
,3
-P) decreases GABA-stimulated
36chloride ion flux (Yu and Ticku, 1995a
), as
well as both 5
,3
-P and benzodiazepine enhancement of
GABA-stimulated 36chloride ion flux (Yu and
Ticku, 1995b
). Chronic 5
,3
-P treatment also reduces the
stimulation of [3H]flunitrazepam binding by
GABA, pentobarbital and 5
,3
-P. Similar treatment of cortical
neurons with chronic pentobarbital also reduces the stimulation of
[3H]flunitrazepam binding by GABA,
pentobarbital and 5
,3
-P (Yu and Ticku, 1995c
).
Based on the studies described above, there are at least two molecular
mechanisms that may contribute to changes in
GABAA receptor sensitivity after chronic drug
treatment and perhaps in fetal ethanol-exposed offspring as well. One
putative mechanism relates to a differential expression of
GABAA receptor subunits in fetal ethanol-exposed
offspring compared with controls. Native brain
GABAA receptors are pentamers comprising two
subunits associated with one or more beta, gamma
and/or a delta subunit (Stephenson et al., 1990
;
Mertens et al., 1993
; Khan et al., 1994
). Currently, there are six known subtypes of alpha subunits,
four beta subunit subtypes and four gamma subunit
subtypes, one delta and two rho, with several
subtypes displaying slice variants (see Klein and Harris, 1996
for
review). More than a dozen heterooligomeric combinations of
GABAA receptors have been found in different
brain regions (McKernan and Whiting, 1996
). Subunit combination has been an important determinant of GABAA receptor
pharmacology. Benzodiazepines require the presence of the
gamma subunit (Pritchett et al., 1989
; Ymer
et al., 1990
; Wafford et al., 1993a, b), whereas modulation by barbiturates or neurosteroids is not influenced by the
presence of the gamma subunit (Ymer et al., 1990
;
Shingai et al., 1991
). Recent studies suggest that the
presence of the delta subunit reduces neurosteroid
modulation of GABAA receptors (Zhu et
al., 1996
). Heterogeneity of GABAA receptor
responses to benzodiazepines is determined by the subtype of
alpha subunit expressed (Montpied et al., 1988
;
Pritchett et al., 1989
; Pritchett and Seeburg, 1991
; Wafford
et al., 1993a, b). GABAA receptors constructed of
3
2
1
subunits are more sensitive to flunitrazepam, whereas
2
1 receptors
containing alpha-2, alpha-1 or alpha-5 constructs are less sensitive (Costa and Guidotti, 1996
). In contrast, GABAA receptors containing either the
alpha-4 or alpha-6 construct have little or no
sensitivity to benzodiazepines (Korpi et al., 1993
; Sigel
et al., 1992
).
Based on these observations, one explanation for prenatal ethanol
exposure-induced decreases in GABAA receptor
sensitivity to benzodiazepines in medial frontal cortex and cerebellum
is an increase in the relative abundance of GABAA
receptors containing alpha-4 or alpha-6 subunits.
In forebrain regions, the alpha-4 construct is typically in
low abundance relative to alpha-1, alpha-2, alpha-3 and alpha-5 constructs (Wisden et
al., 1992
), whereas the alpha-6 construct is present in
the cerebellar granule cell layer in relatively equal abundance with
alpha-1 constructs (Thompson et al., 1992
).
Morrow and colleagues have shown that chronic ethanol exposure, which
decreases GABAA receptor sensitivity to
benzodiazepines (Buck et al., 1991
), elevates the expression
of alpha-4 constructs relative to alpha-1
constructs in the cerebral cortex (Devaud et al., 1995
) and
elevates the expression of alpha-6 constructs relative to
alpha-1 constructs in the cerebellum (Morrow et
al., 1992
). An increase in GABAA receptors
containing the alpha-4 or alpha-6 subtypes
relative to alpha-1, alpha-2, alpha-3
or alpha-5 could explain the decreased response to
flunitrazepam modulation of GABA-mediated
36chloride flux in prenatal ethanol-exposed
offspring (figs. 2 and 3). In the medial frontal cortex, where the
alpha-3 construct predominates (Wisden et al.,
1992
), another explanation for diminished GABAA
receptor sensitivity to benzodiazepines may be a reduction in
alpha-3 subunits relative to alpha-1,
alpha-2 and/or alpha-5 subunits. Conversely,
increased flunitrazepam sensitivity of hippocampal GABAA receptors in fetal ethanol-exposed
offspring may be caused by an increased expression of
alpha-3 subunits relative to alpha-1, alpha-2 and/or alpha-5 subunits.
The extent to which prenatal ethanol-induced changes in neurosteroid
modulation of GABAA receptors may be a function
of differential expression of GABAA receptor
subunits is less clear. Most GABAA receptor
subunits respond to neurosteroids (Lan et al., 1991
; Puia
et al., 1993
), with the possible exception of those
containing the delta subunit (Zhu et al., 1996
),
which indicates that neurosteroid sensitivity does not depend on the
expression of certain alpha, beta or
gamma subunits. Given the paucity of delta
subunit mRNA in the medial frontal cortex (Wisden et al.,
1992
), it is tempting to speculate that the fetal ethanol
exposure-induced reduction in neurosteroid sensitivity in this region
(fig. 2) may be caused by increased delta subunit
expression. However, the potency and type of allosteric modulation may
depend on subunit combination. For example,
6
1
2
receptors are less sensitive to allopregnenolone than those containing
the
6
1
1
subunit (Puia et al., 1993
). Further, neurosteroid
enhancement of [3H]muscimol and
[3H]flunitrazepam binding varies with the type
of alpha subunit present in the GABAA
receptor (Lan et al., 1991
) and varies among brain regions
(Bureau and Olsen, 1993
; Nguyen et al., 1995
). Thus, it is
possible that alterations in the subtypes of alpha or
gamma subunit expressed may play a role in the changes
observed in medial frontal cortex (fig. 2) or hippocampal formation
(fig. 4).
A second molecular mechanism underlying the changes observed in the
medial frontal cortex and the cerebellum of prenatal ethanol-exposed offspring may be a functional uncoupling of the neurosteroid and/or benzodiazepine recognition sites from the GABA recognition site. The
molecular basis for such an uncoupling event is unknown and may or may
not involve an alteration in GABAA receptor
subunit expression. Conversely, elevated GABA receptor sensitivity to the positive modulators in the hippocampal formation of fetal ethanol-exposed offspring may result from more effective coupling of
recognition sites in the presence of positive allosteric modulators and/or less effective coupling in the presence of negative allosteric modulators (fig. 4). An opposite result has been reported after chronic
treatment with ethanol or benzodiazepines in adult animals (Buck and
Harris, 1990
; Allan et al., 1992
).
Currently, studies are underway to determine the relative abundance of alpha subunit mRNA along with [3H]flunitrazepam binding studies in fetal ethanol-exposed offspring. Elevations in the relative abundance of alpha-4 subunits (medial frontal cortex) or alpha-6 subunits (cerebellum) along with striking reductions in [3H]flunitrazepam binding in these regions would provide evidence that altered subunit expression plays a predominant role in fetal ethanol exposure-induced alterations in GABAA receptor pharmacology. Alternatively, little or no change in GABAA receptor subunit expression or [3H]flunitrazepam binding would suggest a functional uncoupling of GABAA receptor recognition sites. In addition, it is possible that both of these mechanisms may contribute by different degrees to the changes observed in various brain regions of fetal ethanol-exposed offspring.
The functional implications of these prenatal ethanol exposure-induced
changes in GABAA receptor function are unclear at
present. In the hippocampal formation, the heightened influence of
positive allosteric modulators relative to negative modulatory
influences (fig. 4) may produce a net enhancement of
GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition of local
excitatory neuronal circuits. This, in turn, could limit mechanisms
underlying activity-dependent changes in synaptic plasticity, such as
the hippocampal LTP deficits observed in littermates of the rats used
in these 36chloride ion flux studies (Sutherland
et al., 1997
). A more direct electrophysiological assessment
of this interpretation would be an analysis of paired-pulse inhibition
and potentiation in the absence and presence of
GABAA receptor modulatory agents. A preliminary in vivo study of paired-pulse inhibition at the perforant
path-dentate granule cell synapse has revealed that paired-pulse
inhibition in the absence of modulatory agents is unaffected by
prenatal ethanol exposure. However, a significantly greater enhancement of paired-pulse inhibition is observed after low doses of either diazepam or alphaxalone in fetal ethanol-exposed offspring compared with pair-fed and ad libitum controls (R. Sutherland, D. Savage, R. McDonald and M. Weisend, unpublished observations).
In contrast to the hippocampal formation, the ability of neurosteroids
and/or benzodiazepines to modulate GABAA
receptor-mediated inhibitory influences in other brain regions, such as
the medial frontal cortex (fig. 2) or cerebellum (fig. 3), may be
severely limited in fetal ethanol-exposed offspring. Although
"base-line" GABAA receptor-mediated
neurotransmission may be relatively "normal" in these regions, the
range of neural responsiveness to changing physiological or
environmental circumstances may be severely diminished. For example,
given that some GABAA receptor subunit complexes are sensitive to metabolites of cortisol or progesterone (see Lambert
et al., 1995
for review), some brain regions may not be capable of responding in an appropriate fashion to the presence of
stressful situations or during portions of the estrus cycle.
Finally, these results suggest that benzodiazepines, neurosteroids and possibly other centrally active therapeutic agents may produce different effects, or no effects at all, in fetal ethanol-exposed offspring. To date, there are no published studies on the effects of benzodiazepine treatment of children with FAS which might substantiate or refute this hypothesis. However, the results of these experiments raise the possibility of atypical pharmacologic responses by children with FAS to therapeutic agents that directly affect central neurotransmitter receptors.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Ana Polaco, Laura Cruz and Lorina Duran for their assistance in the production and maintenance of the rat offspring used in these studies and Buz Tyler for his assistance with the graphical presentation of the data.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 15, 1997.
Received for publication February 10, 1997.
1 This work was supported by PHS grants AA08219 (to A.M.A.) and AA06548 (to D.D.S.) and an NIH Minority Biomedical Research Support Training Grant GM08139 (to A.M.A. and D.D.S.).
Send reprint requests to: Andrea M. Allan, Ph.D., Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5223.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
FG-7142, n-methyl-
-carboline-3-carboxamide;
FAS, fetal alcohol
syndrome;
GABA,
-aminobutyric acid;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
S.E.M., standard error of the mean;
5
, 3
-P,
5
-pregnane-3
-ol-20-one;
HEPES, N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N
-2-ethanesulfonic acid;
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate;
ARND, alcohol-related
neurodevelopmental disorder.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
current in mouse hippocampal and cortical neurons.
Eur J Pharmacol
187: 127-130[Medline].
2 subunits of the GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors.
J Neurochem
63: 1466-1476[Medline].
-aminobutyric acidA receptors to neurosteroids.
J Neurochem
57: 1818-1821[Medline].
and
subunit specific immunopurifications.
J Biol Chem
268: 5965-5973
subunit) mRNA in rat brain.
J Neurochem
51: 1651-1654[Medline].
2 subunit is an integral component of the
-aminobutyric acidA receptor but the
1 polypeptide is the principal site of the agonist benzodiazepine photoaffinity labeling reaction.
J Biol Chem
265: 21160-21165
5 and
6 subunit-like immunoreactivity in rat brain.
Neurosci Lett
144: 53-56[Medline].
subunits on recombinant human
-aminobutyric acid/benzodiazepine receptors.
Mol Pharmacol
44: 437-442[Abstract].
-aminobutyric acidA receptor subtypes.
Mol Pharmacol
43: 240-244[Abstract].
1 subunit of GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors.
EMBO J
9: 3261-3267[Medline].
-aminobutyric acidA receptor complex in mammalian cortical neurons.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther
275: 784-789
-aminobutyric acid type A/benzodiazepine receptor complex in mammalian cortical neurons.
Mol Pharmacol
47: 603-610[Abstract].
Subunit inhibits neurosteroid modulation of GABAA receptors.
J Neurosci
16: 6648-6656This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Dubois, M. Naassila, M. Daoust, and O. Pierrefiche Early chronic ethanol exposure in rats disturbs respiratory network activity and increases sensitivity to ethanol J. Physiol., October 1, 2006; 576(1): 297 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. C. Bailey, J. F. Brien, and J. N. Reynolds Chronic Prenatal Ethanol Exposure Increases GABAA Receptor Subunit Protein Expression in the Adult Guinea Pig Cerebral Cortex J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4381 - 4389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rema and F. F. Ebner Effect of Enriched Environment Rearing on Impairments in Cortical Excitability and Plasticity after Prenatal Alcohol Exposure J. Neurosci., December 15, 1999; 19(24): 10993 - 11006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|