Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (W.R.K., V.M.M.,
R.L.P.), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida and
Anesthesia Research Unit (C.J.L.), Department of
Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis,
Missouri
We assessed the pharmacological activity of anabaseine, a toxin
found in certain animal venoms, relative to nicotine and anabasine on a
variety of vertebrate nicotinic receptors, using cultured cells, the
Xenopus oocyte expression system, contractility assays with skeletal and smooth muscle strips containing nicotinic receptors and in vivo rat prostration assay involving direct
injection into the lateral ventricle of the brain. Anabaseine
stimulated every subtype of nicotinic receptor that was tested. It was
the most potent frog skeletal muscle nicotinic receptor agonist. At
higher concentrations it also blocked the BC3H1 (adult
mouse) muscle type receptor ion channel. The affinities of the three
nicotinoid compounds for rat brain membrane
alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites and their potencies for
stimulating Xenopus oocyte homomeric
alpha7 receptors, expressed in terms of their active monocation concentrations, displayed the same rank order,
anabaseine>anabasine> nicotine. Although the maximum currents
generated by anabaseine and anabasine at alpha7
receptors were equivalent to that of acetylcholine, the maximum
response to nicotine was only about 65% of the acetylcholine response.
At alpha4-beta2 receptors the affinities
and apparent efficacies of anabaseine and anabasine were much less than
that of nicotine. Anabaseine, nicotine and anabasine were nearly
equipotent on sympathetic (PC12) receptors, although parasympathetic
(myenteric plexus) receptors were much more sensitive to anabaseine and
nicotine but less sensitive to anabasine. These differences suggest
that there may be different subunit combinations in these two autonomic nicotinic receptors. The preferential interactions of anabaseine, anabasine and nicotine with different receptor subtypes provides molecular clues that should be helpful in the design of selective nicotinic agonists.
 |
Introduction |
Neuronal
nicotinic receptors have attracted much interest during the past few
years, largely due to the discovery that the Alzheimer's brain loses
many of its nicotinic receptors by the time of death, whereas
muscarinic receptors are much less affected (Kellar et al.,
1987
; Araujo et al., 1988
). So far, therapeutic approaches
directed toward cholinergic systems in the brain have focused on
stimulation of postsyaptic muscarinic cholinergic receptors, either
directly with muscarinic agonists or indirectly by cholinesterase inhibition. Unfortunately these two strategies have thus far yielded only modest improvements in the cognitive functions of Alzheimer's patients. Stimulation of brain nicotinic receptors has been shown to
enhance cognitive function in lower mammals (Woodruff-Pak et al., 1994
; Arendash et al., 1995a
, b; Decker et
al., 1995
; Bjugstad et al., in press), consistent with
the idea that these nicotinic receptors may be potential targets
treatment of Alzheimer's and other dementias (Newhouse et
al., 1993
).
Molecular biological studies have revealed a plethora of nicotinic
receptor subunits in the vertebrate brain (Papke, 1993
; McGehee and
Role, 1995
; Lindstrom, 1996
; Albuquerque et al., 1997
). Although there is still little understanding of the functional consequences of this receptor multiplicity, several labs are
investigating the pharmacological properties of the predominant
nicotinic receptor subtypes occurring in the nervous system to provide
a rational basis for the design of compounds selective for particular
nicotinic receptor subtypes that influence particular mental or motor
functions (Decker et al., 1995
; de Fiebre et al.,
1995
). Flores et al. (1992)
have shown that the major
receptor subtype displaying high nicotine, cytisine and
methylcarbamyl-choline affinity in the rat brain is the alpha4-beta2
combination. A major receptor subtype showing low affinity for nicotine
but high affinity for BTX contains alpha7 subunits
(Wonnacott, 1986
; Luetje et al., 1990
).
Alpha7-containing receptors have been implicated in
cognitive processes affected by hippocampal function, including sensory
gating and spatial memory (Luntz-Leybman et al., 1992
;
Bjugstad et al., in press).
Pharmacological investigations of nicotinic receptors have been
facilitated by the availability of many potent natural toxins, including curare, the erythrina alkaloids, the algal toxin anatoxin-a (Swanson and Albuquerque, 1992
), the frog toxin epibatidine (Badio and
Daly, 1994
; Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1995
), the flowering plant toxin
methyllcaconitine (Ward et al., 1990
), and of course, nicotine. The pharmacological properties of some other potent nicotinic
toxins, including leptodactyline (Erspamer, 1959
) and anabaseine, have
not yet been reported in much detail.
Anabaseine (fig. 1) was initially
isolated from a marine worm, but has subsequently been found in certain
species of ants (Kem et al., 1971
; Wheeler et
al., 1981
). It is as toxic as nicotine when injected in mice (Kem
et al., 1976
), stimulates acetylcholine release from rat
brain cortical minces (Meyer et al., 1987
) and elevates
cortical ACh and norepinephrine levels in the intact rat (Summers
et al., 1997
). As with nicotine, anabaseine enhances passive
avoidance behavior in nucleus basalis-lesioned rats (Meyer et
al., 1994
). At the molecular level anabaseine differs from nicotine and anabasine by having a tetrahydropyridyl ring whose imine
double bond is electronically conjugated with the 3-pyridyl ring (fig.
1). This causes its two rings to be approximately coplanar in their
relative orientation, whereas the two rings in the tobacco alkaloids
nicotine and anabasine are almost perpendicular to each other (Whidby
and Seeman, 1976
; Seeman, 1984
).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Structures of the three nicotinic alkaloids.
Anabaseine (A) is an animal toxin, whereas nicotine (C) and anabasine
(D) are plant alkaloids. Under physiological conditions anabaseine
occurs in three almost equally populated forms (Zoltewicz et
al., 1989 ; Bloom, 1990 ): cyclic iminium (A), cyclic imine and
ammonium-ketone (B). Only the cyclic iminium form of anabaseine
possesses significant nicotinic agonist activity (Kem et
al., 1994b ; Kem et al., submitted).
|
|
Because some anabaseine derivatives have been shown to enhance a
variety of cognitive behaviors (Meyer et al., 1994
;
Woodruff-Pak et al., 1994
; Arendash et al.,
1995b
), we examined the pharmacological properties of anabaseine on a
variety of vertebrate, mostly mammalian, nicotinic receptors. To
quantitatively compare anabaseine with the tobacco alkaloids, we
measured the potencies and binding affinities of all three compounds on
the same receptors under identical experimental conditions. Several
important pharmacological differences were found to exist between the
three compounds. Each displays a unique spectrum of action upon the
various nicotinic receptors. Our data indicate that these compounds
will be useful molecular models to design agonists selective for
particular nicotinic receptors. Portions of this study were previously
reported in abstract form (Kem and Papke, 1992
; Kem et al.,
1994a
).
 |
Materials and Methods |
Chemicals.
Anabaseine was synthesized according to Bloom
(1990)
. The fully ionized, synthetic ammonium-ketone dihydrochloride
salt (MW 251) was used in all of our experiments. DMAB-anabaseine
dihydrochloride was synthesized as previously described (Kem, 1971
;
Zoltewicz et al., 1989
). Stock solutions of anabaseine,
anabasine, nicotine and DMAB-anabaseine were kept in the dark at 5°C
for a maximum of 1 wk to avoid deterioration of the alkaloids.
(S)-Anabasine free base and reagents used to synthesize anabaseine were
obtained from Aldrich (Nukwayjee, WI); (S)-nicotine free base,
mecamylamine and other experimental drugs from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO); BTX and TTX from Boehringer-Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). Radioisotopically labeled compounds, 3H-MCC,
125ICl and 86RbCl were
purchased from Du Pont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).
Frog skeletal muscle contractility.
The two symmetrical
rectus abdominis muscles of each frog (Rana pipiens,
purchased from Nasco, Ft. Atkinson, WI) were used so that anabaseine
potency relative to nicotine or anabasine could be measured on muscles
from the same animal. Each muscle was mounted in a 10-ml tissue bath
containing frog saline (115 mM NaCl, 5.0 mM KCl, 7.0 mM
CaCl2 and 2.0 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) which was continuously bubbled with oxygen at room temperature. The
resting tension was initially adjusted to 1.0 g. After 30 min the
muscles were briefly (20 sec) contracted with isotonic KCl saline (NaCl
replaced with KCl) to measure the maximum isometric force of
contracture. After complete recovery, each muscle was challenged with a
sequence of 9 or 10 increasing concentrations of agonist until a
maximum contractural force was observed. After each application the
muscles were washed twice with normal saline and allowed to recover at
least 30 min before the next contracture, due to the relatively slow
relaxation after exposure to the three alkaloids. After the various
agonist concentrations were tested, the final contractility of each
muscle was again measured with isotonic KCl saline. A
concentration-response curve for each muscle was constructed and
expressed as a percentage of the average KCl-induced contracture force.
The concentration-response data for each compound was fitted to the
Hill equation using SigmaPlot and the EC50 and its S.E. were calculated from the computer-fitted curve.
Patch clamp experiments with neuromuscular type nicotinic
receptors.
BC3H-1 cells were cultured according to Covarrubias
et al. (1989)
. During single channel recordings they were
bathed in a saline containing 140 mM NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 10 mM NaHEPES, 1.8 mM CaCl2 and 2.0 mM MgCl2
titrated to pH 7.4. Single channels were recorded from cell-attached
patches. The pipette saline containing agonist was otherwise identical
to the bath saline. In most cases, cells were incubated for 5 to 12 min
with 48 nM BTX before recordings to reduce the number of available
channels in a patch. Single channel records were stored on videotape
using a digital audioprocesser (20 kHz bandwidth). For computer
analysis of single channel records, recordings were replayed and
digitized at 50 kHz with analog filtering to yield a bandwidth of 5 kHz. Single channel events were analyzed with standard half amplitude
threshold crossing methods (Auerbach and Lingle, 1987
).
AChR activity was typically examined with agonist concentrations of 5 µM or higher. At such concentrations, channel openings and closings
occur in groups that predominantly represent the behavior of single
nicotinic receptors as they exit from relatively long-lived
desensitized states (Sakmann et al., 1980
; Sine and Steinbach, 1984
; Auerbach and Lingle, 1987
) and that provide
information about the true EC50 for half
activation of current and the microscopic agonist efficacy, without the
complications of desensitization (Ogden and Colquhoun, 1985
; Marshall
et al., 1991
; Lingle et al., 1992
). From
continuous records of channel activity, lists of channel transitions
were subjected to a first pass sifting of groups of openings using an
arbitrary group terminator, typically about 30 msec, to generate
log-binned histograms (Sigworth and Sine, 1987
). Based on the
properties of closed intervals distributions, groups were then
reselected with a new group terminator value. Group terminators were at
least three to five times the closed interval identified as an
activation closure (see "Results"), except at 5 µM where the
group terminator was only 2-fold the activation closure. Group
terminator values were 20 msec or longer for 50, 100 or 200 µM
anabaseine, 50 or 100 msec for 20 µM anabaseine, and 100 msec for 5 or 10 µM anabaseine. For analysis of channel blockade by anabaseine,
a simple and approximate two-state missed events procedure (Blatz and
Magleby, 1986
) was selected that only uses the fast component of
closures and the longer open interval durations.
The probability of being open within a cluster was determined directly
from the closed and open interval durations and the numbers of each
component in the histograms (Ogden and Colquhoun, 1985
; Marshall
et al., 1991
). Closures longer than the primary activation
closure were considered to separate clusters and the putative blocking
gap was also excluded from the po determination. All transmembrane potentials were calculated from the single channel current and the measured single channel conductance of 39 pA, assuming
a reversal potential of 0 mV.
Xenopus oocyte expression and functional analysis of rat brain
nicotinic receptors.
Preparation of in vitro
synthesized cRNA transcripts and oocyte injection have been described
previously (de Fiebre et al., 1995
). Recordings were made 2 to 7 days after injections. Oocytes were placed in a Lucite recording
chamber with a 0.6 ml total volume and perfused at room temperature
with frog saline (115 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) containing 1 µM
atropine to block potential muscarinic responses. Calcium-activated chloride channels were not suppressed in our experiments, because their
functional presence does not affect the agonist concentration-response relation (Papke et al., 1977a). Drugs were diluted in
perfusion solution and then applied after preloading of a 2.0 ml length of tubing at the terminus of the perfusion system. A Mariotte flask
filled with Ringer saline was used to maintain a constant hydrostatic
pressure for drug deliveries and washes. The rate (6 ml/min) of drug
delivery was constant for all compound concentrations and receptor
subtypes. Current responses to drug administration were measured using
a two electrode voltage clamp with a holding potential of -50 mV.
Recordings were made using a Warner Instruments oocyte amplifier
interfaced with National Instruments LabView software.
Current electrodes were filled with 250 mM CsCl, 250 mM CsF and 100 mM
EGTA, pH 7.3 and had resistances of 0.5 to 2.0 megaohms. Voltage
electrodes were filled with 3 M KCl and had resistances of 1 to 3 megaohms. Only oocytes with resting membrane potentials more negative
than -30 mV were used. Responses were normalized for the level of
channel expression in each individual cell by measuring the response of
the oocyte to an initial control ACh application 5 min before
presentation of experimental solutions. The control ACh concentrations
were 10 µM for alpha4-beta2 receptors and 500 µM for alpha7 receptors. Receptors expressed from
alpha-7 cDNA often display an increased responsiveness after
an initial application of agonist that subsequently stabilizes (de
Fiebre et al., 1995
). Therefore, all alpha7
expressing oocytes received two control applications of ACh separated
by 5 min at the start of recording. The second ACh response was then
used to normalize the experimental response. For each experimental
concentration the mean current response and S.E. were calculated from
the normalized responses of at least four oocytes.
After the application of experimental drug solutions, the cells were
washed with control Ringer's solution for 5 min and then evaluated for
potential inhibition and response stability by measuring the oocyte
response to another application of the ACh (control) solution. These
second control responses were normalized to the initial ACh control
responses measured 10 min earlier. If the second ACh response showed a
difference of > 25% of the initial ACh control response the
oocyte was not used for further analysis. If the postexperimental ACh
control was within 75% of the preexperiment control ACh response, the
second ACh application was allowed to serve as the control response to
normalize the response of any subsequent experimental application.
Radioligand binding to nicotinic receptors.
The steady-state
binding of the three nicotinic compounds to neuromuscular type
receptors was measured indirectly by assessing their ability to inhibit
the rate of 125I-BTX binding to Torpedo
californica membranes prepared according to Eldefrawi et
al. (1980)
.
The ability of anabaseine to displace the specific binding of 5 nM
3H-MCC to rat cerebral cortex synaptosomal
membranes was used to assess the ability of anabaseine and related
nicotinoid compounds to bind to high nicotine affinity neuronal
receptors, which in the rat are primarily of the
alpha4-beta2 subtype (Flores et al., 1992
). The methods of Boksa and Quirion (1987)
were followed with only
minor modifications. Binding of 125I-BTX (1 nM,
119 Ci/mmol) to rat brain membranes was performed in a total volume of
0.25 ml, essentially as described by Marks and Collins (1982)
.
Membranes (0.4 mg protein per sample) were incubated with the
radioligand at 37°C for 3 hr in the buffer indicated above, which
also contained 2 mg/ml BSA. Displacement curves were analyzed by EBDA
(Ligand) and Ki values were
calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff (1973) equation.
Measurement of ganglionic nicotinic receptor activation.
Rat
pheochromocytoma (PC 12) cells grown in the absence of nerve growth
factor on polylysine-coated plastic culture dishes were loaded
overnight with 86Rb preceding the efflux assays,
which were carried out essentially as described by Lukas and Cullen
(1988)
at pH 7.4. After washing away extracellular rubidium three
times, the agonist (in saline containing 10 µM atropine sulfate to
inhibit muscarinic receptors and 0.5 mM ouabain to prevent rubidium
reuptake by active transport) was added and 1 min later the released
rubidium was removed for gamma counting. The rubidium efflux during
agonist stimulation was expressed as a percent of total cellular
rubidium released by 1 mM carbachol during the same time. All efflux
estimates were corrected for spontaneous efflux in the absence of
agonist. The amount of 86Rb remaining after the 1 min test period in each cell sample was determined after exposure to
1.0 M NaOH for at least 1 hr. All measurements were done in
quadruplicate.
A rat colon (Romano, 1981
) preparation was used to assess the agonist
activity of anabaseine. Longitudinal muscle strips with intact
myenteric plexus were suspended in Tyrode saline (pH 7.4) and aerated
with a continuous stream of oxygen bubbles. Each muscle was initially
adjusted to a length which maintained a resting tension of 0.5g.
Isometric contractions were recorded with a Grass FT.03 force
displacement transducer connected to a Grass model 7 polygraph.
i.c.v. administration of anabaseine.
When injected i.c.v.
with a nicotinic agonist, rats rapidly become immobile with extended
legs (Abood et al., 1981
). This prostration response was
used to compare the central activity of anabaseine relative to
nicotine. After implantation of a metal cannula into the third
ventricle, 5 days were allowed for recovery from surgery. The rat
received injections with 2 or 4 µl of the experimental compound
dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution, pH 6.5. Prostration was
judged to have occurred when all four legs of the Sprague-Dawley male
rat (250-300 g) remained laterally extended for at least 10 sec. To
detect prostration each rat was observed for at least 5 min after
injection. All rats that were not prostrated after injection were
killed after an additional i.c.v. injection of Evan's blue dye to
ascertain that the cannula was operational; the result was not used if
the dye was absent from the lateral ventricular space.
 |
Results |
Activation of frog neuromuscular nicotinic receptors by
anabaseine.
Anabaseine acted as a potent nicotinic agonist on frog
rectus abdominis muscle. A wide variety of natural toxins and synthetic compounds have previously been tested on this preparation, which facilitated quantitative comparison of anabaseine with these other substances (table 1). When the median
effective concentrations of the active, monocationic forms of each
compound were compared, anabaseine was only 14- and 3.7-fold less
potent, respectively, than epibatidine and anatoxin-a, which are the
most potent nicotinic agonists thus far reported. Nicotine was 6.7-fold
and cytisine 23-fold less potent than anabaseine.
The stimulatory action of anabaseine was competitively antagonized by
the reversible nicotinic antagonist d-tubocurarine (fig. 2A) but noncompetitively antagonized by
BTX, which due its extremely tight binding, acts essentially
irreversibly on skeletal muscle type nicotinic receptors (fig. 2B). At
higher concentrations both antagonists completely inhibited the effects
of micromolar concentrations of anabaseine, which is consistent with
the hypothesis that anabaseine action on the muscle membrane is
mediated entirely through nicotinic receptors. The
concentration-response curves for anabaseine, anabasine and nicotine
are shown in figure 3. The contractures
generated by all three of these weakly basic compounds were slow in
onset as well as in reversal compared with carbamylcholine (results not
shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Ability of muscle nicotinic receptor antagonists to
affect the contracting action of anabaseine. (A) The reversible
antagonist d-tubocurarine (10 µM) shifts the
anabaseine concentration-response curve to the right.
n = 6 muscles per point, except the lowest two
concentrations of anabaseine alone, where n = 4. The EC50 for anabaseine in the presence of TC was
calculated assuming that the maximum contractile response was the same
as when anabaseine was applied alone. (B) BTX (30 minutes initial
exposure) irreversibly reduces the response at all anabaseine
concentrations. n = 12 muscles per point for
anabaseine alone and n = 6 for points with BTX.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Relative actions of anabaseine, anabasine and
nicotine upon frog rectus abdominis muscle at pH 7.2 For anabaseine,
n = 8 muscles per point; for nicotine,
n = 6 muscles per point except the highest concentration where n = 4; for anabasine,
n = 6 except for the two highest concentrations
where n = 4.
|
|
The neuromuscular agonist potency of anabaseine on frog rectus
abdominis muscles is compared with those of other naturally occurring
nicotinic agonists in table 1. The estimated potency of the
monocationic form of each agonist was calculated assuming that its
nicotinic stimulatory potency was entirely due to its monocationic
form. Much data support this assumption for nicotine (Barlow and
Hamilton, 1962
; Bartels and Podleski, 1964
), anabaseine (Kem et
al., 1994b
; Kem et al., in preparation) and other
nicotinic agonists. The cyclic iminium form of anabaseine was
calculated to be approximately 7X more potent than monocationic
nicotine.
Interaction of nicotinoid compounds with electric fish muscle
nicotinic receptors.
The relative abilities of the three
nicotinoid compounds to inhibit 125I-BTX binding
to Torpedo electric organ membranes are shown in figure
4. Anabaseine displayed the highest
affinity of the three compounds although anabasine displayed the lowest
affinity (table 2). The relative
Kd for the electric fish muscle were
very similar with the frog rectus muscle potency
(EC50) estimates shown in table
3.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nicotinoid displacement of 125I-BTX
binding to Torpedo electric organ membranes. Membranes
containing 10 µg protein by Lowry assay were preincubated 15 min with
anabaseine in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) containing 2 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin and then incubated for 1 hr with 125I-BTX in
a final volume of .25 ml. Nonspecific binding was measured in the
presence of 1 mM nicotine. After incubation samples were diluted with
1.2 ml of ice cold buffer and bound radioligand was separated from free
ligand by filtration under vacuum through glass fiber filters (Whatman
GF/C) at 4°C. The filters were presoaked for 15 min in 0.5% (v/v)
polyethyleneimine containing 0.25 mg/ml BSA and washed with 2.5 ml
buffer before filtration. The membranes were washed twice on the
filters with 4 ml of ice cold buffer and then counted with a Biogamma
counter. Each point is the average of triplicate measurements. Data
were fitted with EBDA software (Ligand).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Relative affinity (Ki) estimates for anabaseine, anabasine and
nicotine on different vertebrate nicotinic receptors, expressed in
terms of the active monocationic species
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Relative potency estimates for anabaseine, anabasine and nicotine on
different vertebrate nicotinic receptors
|
|
Activation of mammalian neuromuscular nicotinic receptors by
anabaseine.
The ability of anabaseine to activate mouse embryonic
neuromuscular type nicotinic receptors was examined using cell-attached single channel recordings from the clonal BC3H-1 cell line. The single
channel conductance in the presence of anabaseine was indistinguishable from that obtained using ACh. As reported for other nicotinic agonists
(Colquhoun and Sakmann, 1985
; Sine and Steinbach, 1986
; Papke et
al., 1988
), a low anabaseine concentration (40 nM) caused two
types of open channel activity: short duration (<500 µsec) bursts
resulting primarily from single brief openings and long duration (>3
msec) bursts that were often interrupted by brief closures (results not
shown). Histograms of burst durations revealed two components. The
average duration of the longer component was somewhat shorter than for
bursts activated by ACh, although the voltage-dependence of the burst
durations was similar for both agonists. In some cases three components
better described the distribution of burst durations, a characteristic
also noted for bursts activated by ACh (Colquhoun and Sakmann, 1985
).
To better compare the relative effectiveness of anabaseine and ACh as
agonists, the behavior of nicotinic receptors activated by 5 µM or
higher anabaseine was then examined. The appearance of groupings of
channel openings and closings activated by either ACh or anabaseine is
shown in figure 5 for three
concentrations of each agonist. For both agonists, as the concentration
of the agonist increased, the average duration of closures within the periods of activity became shorter and the average time the channel is
open within clusters increased. Typically, open interval histograms were best fit with two exponential components, although at the highest
anabaseine concentrations only a single open interval component was
observed. Closed interval histograms were best described by four or
five components. Examination of closed interval distributions revealed
one component that occurred with a frequency of about 0.08 to 0.11 per
msec open time. This component became shorter in duration with
increases in anabaseine concentration and is therefore a strong
candidate for a closure reflecting reopenings of a channel from closed
states directly leading to channel opening. We term this an activation
closure. Support for this idea arises from the fact that the average
time between such closures is comparable to the mean burst duration
observed at low agonist concentrations. The time constant of the
activation closure observed in these histograms was as follows (at -80 to -100 mV): 5 µM: 5.9 ± 1.2 msec (mean S.D.),
n = 4 patches; 10 µM: 27.8 ± 3.1 msec,
n = 5; 20 µM: 1.2 ± 3.6 msec, n = 8; 50 µM: 3.9 ± 1.9 msec, n = 7; 100 µM
2.4 ± .9 msec, n = 6; 200 µM: 0.8 ± 0.5 msec, n = 5. Closed histograms in many cases contained
components at particular agonist concentrations that would be likely to
overlap or contaminate these activation closures. However, such
additional components in all cases occurred at frequencies considerably
less than 0.05 per msec open time. Thus, although these additional
closures may bias the properties of the component arising primarily
from activation closures, they only minimally alter our estimates of
duration and frequency of the activation closures.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nicotinic agonist activity of anabaseine and ACh
upon BC3H-1 cells. Data were recorded using the cell-attached voltage
clamp method. Groupings of openings activated by either ACh (A) or
anabaseine (B) are shown. Groups for analysis were selected as defined
in "Materials and Methods." Qualitatively, closed intervals within groups of openings become shorter with increases in agonist
concentration. With anabaseine, open intervals become shorter with
increases in agonist concentration as a result of channel block by
anabaseine, and an increase in frequency of a short duration gap is
apparent.
|
|
A notable characteristic of the openings activated by anabaseine is
that, as anabaseine concentration is increased, there is a shortening
of the apparent time a channel stays open before closing and an
increase in frequency of the short lived closure. This short-lived
closure of about 80 to 120 µsec duration was the primary component in
the closed interval histograms particularly at 20 µM anabaseine and
higher. A short-lived closure of similar duration was also observed at
40 nM anabaseine, but with a frequency of only 0.07 ± 0.04 per
msec open time. From the total open time in a record and the number of
detected short gaps, a blockage frequency plot (see Ogden and
Colquhoun, 1985
) was generated (fig. 6A),
which possessed a slope of 1.2 × 107
M
1 sec
1. This
linear dependence of the short gap frequency on anabaseine concentration is consistent with simple channel block behavior, as
described for numerous channel blockers (Ogden and Colquhoun, 1985
;
Marshall et al., 1991
). Figure 6B shows the dependence of open interval duration and duration of the fast gap on anabaseine concentration. Values in figure 6B were corrected for missed events. The fit of a simple blocking model to the open interval durations yielded a drug blocking rate of 1.8 × 107
M
1 sec
1.
Considering the correction for missed events in the latter case, this
blocking rate is comparable to that from analysis of the blocking gap
frequency. The duration (fig. 6C) of the corrected blocking gap
increased with membrane hyperpolarization (e-fold per 66 mV), although
the frequency per unit open time of the fast gap (fig. 6D) exhibited
only a slight increase (e-fold per 150 mV) with hyperpolarization.
Analysis of the voltage-dependence of open interval durations also
indicates that the forward rate of blockade is less voltage-dependent
than the unblocking rate.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Rapid channel block of BC3H-1 receptor channels by
anabaseine. In A, the frequency of occurrence (events per msec open
time) of a closed interval component of duration of about 100 msec is plotted as a function of anabaseine concentration. Patches with calculated membrane potential between -75 and -100 were included in
this analysis. Error bars are S.E. for 6, 4, 7, 7, 9, 8 and 5 files for
0.04, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 µM, respectively. The fitted line
has a slope of 1.2 × 107 M 1
sec 1, with intercept of 102 ± 88/s. In B, the
blocking gap duration (open circles) and longer open time component
(filled circles) are plotted as a function of anabaseine concentration.
Error bars are S.E.s. Values were corrected for missed events. The open
durations were fit with t([Anabaseine])= 1/(a * f[Anabaseine]),
where a is the channel closing rate at low [Anabaseine]. The fitted
values were a = 210 ± 10 sec 1, with f = 1.8 (± .3) × 107 M 1 sec 1. In
C, the duration of fast gaps corrected for missed events is plotted as
a function of membrane potential. Only values obtained with 100 µM
anabaseine were included in both C and D. The fitted line is described
by tc(V) = tc(0)* e(A*V) with
tc(0) = 0.02 ± .01 msec and A = -0.017 ± 0.003/mV. In D, the frequency of fast gaps scaled by the anabaseine
concentration (100 µM) is plotted as a function of membrane
potential. The 0-voltage frequency was 7.13 ± 2.56 sec 1 mM 1, with a voltage-dependence of
-0.007 ± 0.003/mV.
|
|
The relative effectiveness of ACh and anabaseine as agonists was
examined by comparing cluster po values over a
similar concentration range. Cluster pos were
determined as described in "Materials and Methods," based on
identification of the activation closure described above. After
correction for the occurrence of channel block, 20 µM anabaseine
resulted in a po of 0.59 ± 0.12 (eight patches). In comparison, 20 µM ACh resulted in a cluster
po of 0.90 ± 0.02 (eight patches).
Estimates of po for multiple patches over a range
of anabaseine concentrations are plotted in figure 7. A fit using the modified Hill equation
(see fig. 7 legend) to the po values suggests
that the limiting po for anabaseine is about
0.75 ± 0.08 (± 90% confidence limit) with half-activation at
9.6 ± 2.3 µM. The EC50 with ACh was
somewhat less than 5 µM (not shown). The limiting
po value qualitatively indicates that the
efficacy of anabaseine in opening this channel is somewhat less than
for ACh. Taking into consideration that only 29% of the anabaseine
molecules are in the active cyclic iminium form at pH 7.4, the potency
(EC50) of the anabaseine cyclic iminium for
activating the receptor was about twice that of ACh.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Dependence of BC3H-1 nicotinic receptor channel
cluster open probability on anabaseine. Channel open probability was
calculated from the interval distributions from selected groups as
described in "Materials and Methods." Closures attributed to
channel block or short-lived desensitized states were excluded by this
method. Each point is the mean of 4, 5, 8, 7, 6, and 5 values for 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 µM anabaseine, respectively, with error bars showing the S.E. The points were fit to po([Anabaseine])=
po(max)/(1+(EC50/[Anabaseine])n)
with po(max) = 0.75 ± 0.08, EC50 = 9.6 ± 2.3, and n = 1.6 ± .5.
|
|
Rat brain neuronal nicotinic receptors: Xenopus oocyte
experiments.
At alpha7 receptors anabaseine and
anabasine displayed very similar efficacies, although nicotine was
significantly less efficacious (fig. 8A).
Anabaseine and anabasine displayed the highest potencies for homomeric
alpha7 receptor. The concentration dependence of recovery in
responsiveness to ACh to each compound displayed the same concentration
dependence as its agonist activity (fig. 8B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Full agonist actions of anabaseine and anabasine
upon rat brain alpha7 homomeric receptors expressed in
the Xenopus oocyte. Agonist responses were normalized to
the individual oocyte's response to a control ACh (500 µM)
application made 5 min before the experimental applications. Each point
represents the average response (±S.E.) of at least four oocytes to
that agonist concentration.(A) concentration-response curves for
activation of the receptor. (B) Concentration-response curves showing
residual inhibitory activity 5 min after washing away the nicotinic
agonist. The ACh data, previously reported in Papke et
al. (1994) , are included for comparison with the three alkaloids.
|
|
Anabaseine and anabasine were only weak partial agonists upon the
alpha4-beta2 receptor, displaying 8 and 4%,
respectively, of the maximal current elicited by ACh (fig.
9). Nicotine displayed a much higher
efficacy at this receptor. The EC50s of the three nicotinoid compounds, corrected for their differing degrees of ionization, are presented in table 3. It was previously reported that
anabaseine-activated currents in the oocyte were prolonged in
comparison with ACh, in their rates of activation and desensitization (de Fiebre et al., 1995
). The anabasine and nicotine
responses observed in this study also were prolonged relative to those
generated by ACh.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Weak partial agonist actions of anabaseine and
anabasine upon alpha4-beta2 receptors
expressed in the Xenopus oocyte. Agonist responses were
normalized to the individual oocyte's response to a control ACh (500 µM) application made 5 min before the experimental applications. Each
point represents the average response (±S.E.) of at least four oocytes
to that agonist concentration. The ACh data, previously reported in
Papke et al. (1994) , are included for comparison with
the three alkaloids.
|
|
Rat brain neuronal nicotinic receptors: radioligand binding
experiments.
Next we examined the ability of anabaseine, anabasine
and nicotine to bind to rat brain neuronal receptors using two
radioligand binding assays, involving displacement of
125I-BTX and 3H-MCC
binding. Displacement of the first radioligand predominantly measures
interaction with alpha7-containing receptors although displacement of the second one measures
alpha4-beta2 receptor binding (Flores et
al., 1992
).
The relative abilities of the three compounds to displace
125I-BTX binding from brain receptors are shown
in figure 10. When the Ki of anabaseine was expressed in terms of
its cyclic iminium form the affinity of anabaseine for these sites was
nearly twice that of anabasine and seven times that of nicotine (table
2). The displacement data were well fitted by the EBDA single binding site model.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Nicotinic agonist displacement of specific
[125I]-alpha-bungarotoxin binding to rat
brain membranes. The BTX concentration was 1 nM. Membranes were
equilibrated with the radioligand for 1 hr at 37 C before washing and
filtration with ice-cold saline. Nonspecific binding was determined in
the presence of 1 mM nicotine. Each point represents the mean value for
triplicate samples. The IC50s of the three alkaloids,
determined by EBDA software, are shown in the box.
|
|
Anabaseine previously was reported to displace the binding of tritiated
cytisine to rat brain membranes (Meyer et al., 1994
). However, the nature of this inhibition was not determined. We investigated the effect of anabaseine on specific binding of
3H-MCC to rat brain high nicotine affinity
receptors. Scatchard analysis of 3H-MCC binding
in the absence and presence of anabaseine indicated that competitive
inhibition occurred, as the slope decreased in the presence of
anabaseine while the Bmax was not affected (fig. 11).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Scatchard plot showing anabaseine effect upon
binding of [3H]-methylcarbamylcholine to rat brain high
nicotine affinity receptors. Each point represents the mean value for
triplicate samples. The Kd of
[3H]-MCC was calculated to be 11 nM.
|
|
Our next goal was to assess the affinity of anabaseine, relative to the
two tobacco alkaloids. The displacement curves are shown in figure
12 and the
Kis for the monocationic forms are
expressed in table 2. The Ki for nicotine
displacement of 3H-MCC from the
alpha4-beta2 receptor subtype was about 100X less than for the neuronal BTX binding site, although the affinities of
anabaseine and anabasine for these two major brain receptors were very
similar.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Nicotinic agonist displacement of specific
[3H]-MCC binding to rat cerebral cortex membranes. The
tritiated MCC concentration was 5 nM and the saline pH was 7.4. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM
carbamylcholine. Each point represents a mean value obtained from
triplicate estimates. The IC50s shown in the box were
determined with EBDA software.
|
|
Anabaseine stimulation of autonomic nicotinic receptors.
All
three nicotinic agonists acted as high efficacy nicotinic receptor
agonists on PC12 cells (table 3). The major ganglionic nicotinic
receptor (Rogers et al., 1992
) in this transformed cell line
consists of alpha3 and beta4 subunits, and was
previously shown to possess relatively low affinity for nicotine and
ACh in functional assays (Lukas and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas, 1989; Wong et al., 1995
). Because maximum nicotinic stimulation of the
cells by the three alkaloids and carbamylcholine caused the release of
only a small (usually less than 10%) fraction of the internal rubidium, our efflux measurements with this ion should reflect the
average extent of receptor activation over the time (1 min) of the
measurement. All three compounds acted as full agonists relative to
carbachol (concentration-response curves not shown). When concentration
was expressed in terms of the active cationic form of each compound,
the potencies of the three nicotinoid compounds were very similar
(table 3).
In terms of monocationic concentration, the rat colon relaxing potency
of anabaseine was very similar to that of nicotine, but significantly
greater than that of anabasine (table 3). The action of anabaseine on
this preparation was non-competitively inhibited by tetrodotoxin, as
would be expected if it acts by exciting myenteric plexus neurons (fig.
13).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
Relaxing action of anabaseine and nicotine upon
rat colon longitudinal muscle. The relaxing ability of a particular
concentration of agonist was determined by adding it to the bath as
soon as the peak contraction caused by 320 nM oxotremorine had been
reached The amplitude of relaxation was expressed as a percentage of
the oxotremorine-stimulated contractile force. TTX inhibited the
relaxing effect of anabaseine in a noncompetitive fashion.
n = 6 for both anabaseine and nicotine curves, although
n = 4 for the anabaseine plus TTX curve.
|
|
Intracerebroventricular administration of anabaseine: rat
prostration experiments.
On a mole basis, anabaseine was
approximately 2.7-fold less potent than nicotine in causing prostration
when administered into the lateral ventricle of the unanesthetized rat
(fig. 14). If only the monocationic
forms of the two compounds are active, this equipotent mole ratio would
become nearly one. Nicotine was less potent in our experiments than was
previously reported by Abood et al. (1981)
. This may have
been due to our use of a slightly more stringent behavioral endpoint
for assessing prostration, as described in the Methods section.
Mecamylamine and DHBE both inhibited the prostrating action of
anabaseine. A large dose (80 µg) of DMAB-anabaseine failed to
prostrate rats but did partially inhibit the prostrating action of
nicotine.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 14.
Anabaseine causes immediate prostration in the
rat. Also shown is the inhibition of 80 µg anabaseine prostration by
pretreatment either with 40 µM mecamylamine or
dihydro-B-erythroidine, and the inhibition of 20 µg nicotine
prostration by 80 µg DMAB-anabaseine. The number of animals receiving
injections (i.c.v.) at each dose is indicated within parentheses. Doses
(µg) of anabaseine were based on its dihydrochloride form, whereas
those of nicotine were based on its free base form.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
Anabaseine selectively stimulates nicotinic receptors.
Although anabaseine stimulated all of the nicotinic receptor
preparations that we investigated, its high potency upon neuromuscular and alpha7 nicotinic receptors is particularly noteworthy.
On the skeletal muscle membrane, anabaseine appears to work entirely on
nicotinic receptors, because its action could be completely blocked by
the insurmountable antagonist BTX. Nerve action potentials were
unaffected by this compound, even at millimolar concentrations (Kem,
1971
). However, an effect at nerve terminals cannot yet be ruled out,
as some mammalian motoneuron terminals seem to possess nicotinic
receptors. Anabaseine affected neither rat brain muscarinic receptors
nor plasma cholinesterase, except at very high concentrations (>100
µM) where nonspecific membrane effects often occur (Kem et
al., 1994c
). Stimulation of the rat brain
5-HT3 receptor, which possesses a subunit
sequence homologous with nicotinic receptor subunits, was only
inhibited by 24% in the presence of 100 µM anabaseine (Machu
et al., 1996
). Thus, anabaseine is expected to selectively
act on nicotinic receptors at concentrations of less than 100 µM.
Anabaseine actions upon single neuromuscular channels.
The
results show that the characteristics of openings and groups of
openings activated by anabaseine at both low and high concentrations
share many similarities to properties of openings activated by ACh.
Based on the total concentration (~10 µM) of anabaseine at which a
half maximal channel open probability is achieved, anabaseine activates
the mouse embryonic neuromuscular nicotinic receptor with an apparent
affinity slightly less than that of ACh (2-10 µM; Sine and
Steinbach, 1987
; C. Lingle, unpublished results). However, because the
cyclic minimum concentration of anabaseine is only 29% of its total
concentration at pH 7.4, this active form of anabaseine is probably
slightly more potent than ACh on this mammalian receptor, as at the
amphibian neuromuscular receptor (table 1). In our experiments the
intrinsic activity or true efficacy (after correcting for its
channel-blocking action) of anabaseine displayed a limiting open
probability of less than 0.8 compared with values in excess of 0.9 for
ACh (Sine and Steinbach, 1987
; Zhang et al., 1995
). A higher
limiting po value for the compound might have
been achieved if higher anabaseine concentrations had been tested.
Anabaseine was a more effective open channel blocker than ACh (Ogden
and Colquhoun, 1985
; Sine and Steinbach, 1984
). This conclusion is
largely based on the longer duration of the blocking interval produced
by anabaseine. Qualitatively, the voltage-dependence of block and the
linear dependence of blocking event frequency on anabaseine
concentration are both consistent with the idea that anabaseine blocks
the nicotinic receptor pore by a simple channel blocking mechanism. For
a simple block model, the microscopic affinity of anabaseine for its
blocking site is describable by Kd(V) = Kd(0) * expA*V where
Kd(0) is the 0-voltage affinity and A
describes the voltage-dependence of the block. From the values derived
from fitting the blocking and unblocking rates shown in figure 6C and
D, Kd(0) = 7 mM with A = 0.024/mV,
which corresponds with the movement of a single charged species a
little more than halfway through the electric field. However, despite
the somewhat stronger channel blocking effect of anabaseine, the
affinity of anabaseine for block of the open channel was still much
lower than the concentrations effective at activating the receptor.
Over the physiological range of membrane potentials, the effective
Kds for channel block exceeded 500 µM
anabaseine, so even at concentrations in excess of about 20 µM the
reduction of macroscopic current by channel block would be rather
minor.
Electrophysiological comparison of the three alkaloids on
oocyte-expressed neuronal nicotinic receptors.
Anabaseine (Papke
et al., 1994
) and anabasine (table 3) both displayed low
efficacies on the Xenopus oocyte expressed
alpha4-beta2 receptor. A submaximal efficacy on
this receptor has previously been observed with other potent nicotinic
agonists, including cytisine, anatoxin-a, epibatidine, nicotine
and the synthetic nicotinic agonist ABT-418 (Papke and Heinemann,
1994
; Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1995
; Papke et al., in
press). Apparently the ligand molecular requirements for activating
this receptor subtype are even more stringent than those for high
affinity binding. Because most of the agonists that display high
affinity are larger, less flexible molecules, high efficacy may be
related to an ability to bind within a relatively restricted space on
this receptor. An alternative interpretation would be that the
alpha4-beta2 receptor channel is more readily
blocked by receptor agonists, which would be reflected in a smaller
maximum response or efficacy (Papke et al., 1997
b).
Patch-clamp analyses of the actions of these agonists are clearly
needed to determine the basis for the reduced apparent efficacy of
these compounds on alpha4-beta2 and
alpha7 nicotinic receptors.
We observed a similar rank order, anabaseine> anabasine>nicotine
for Xenopus oocyte alpha7 receptor potency (table
3) as for rat brain alpha7 receptor affinity, as measured by
BTX binding displacement (table 2). In both experiments the apparent
affinities of anabaseine and anabasine for this nicotinic receptor were
significantly higher than that of nicotine. Due to the rapid
desensitization of alpha7 receptors, concentration-response
curves for this receptor are quite dependent on the rate of agonist
application (Papke et al., 1997
). Because differences in
experimental methods for agonist application between laboratories
prevented us from quantitatively comparing our present
alpha7 data on anabaseine and anabasine with previously
published data for nicotine, we again determined the
concentration-response relation for nicotine under the same conditions.
We found that the apparent efficacy (maximum current) of nicotine for
stimulation of the homomeric alpha7 receptor was much less
than that of anabaseine, anabasine or ACh (fig. 8).
Comparing the efficacies of the three alkaloids on the
alpha7 and alpha4-beta2 receptors, it
is readily apparent that anabaseine displays the greatest efficacy and
affinity at alpha7 receptors, although at
alpha4-beta2 receptors anabaseine and anabasine
display a much lower efficacy and affinity than nicotine. This
combination of properties predicts that the in vivo actions
of anabaseine and anabasine on the brain are mostly mediated through
alpha7 receptors, although the actions of nicotine are
largely mediated through alpha4-beta2 and
possibly other high nicotine affinity receptors sharing a similar
pharmacological profile in receptor binding and efficacy.
Anabaseine interaction with rat brain membrane nicotinic
receptors.
Our binding data with the naturally expressed
BTX-binding nicotinic receptor is in agreement with our functional data
on the oocyte-expressed homomeric alpha7 receptor. Quik
et al. (1996)
have reported an excellent correspondence
between the ligand binding properties of the rat brain
alpha7-containing receptor and those of the homomeric
alpha7 receptor expressed in a transfected cell line, which
is consistent with the notion that the alpha7 receptor in
the rat brain may also be homomeric. However, Anand et al. (1993)
have observed some pharmacological differences between the
artificially expressed homomeric chick alpha7 receptor and brain receptors containing the alpha7 subunit, so at least
in the chick brain the receptors are not the same.
We have shown that anabaseine acts as a competitive antagonist of
3H-MCC, altering the apparent affinity of this
radioligand without significantly affecting the receptor concentration
available for binding (fig. 11). Compounds that act allosterically at
sites other than the ACh recognition site would affect the Scatchard
plot for MCC binding in a different manner (Takayama et al.,
1989
). Although our results indicate that anabaseine primarily
interacts with the ACh recognition sites of the receptor, it is
possible that anabaseine might also bind to one or more allosteric
sites that would not be detected by displacement of tritiated MCC.
Indeed, our finding that anabaseine has a channel blocking action above 20 µM on BC3H-1 cell nicotinic channels implies
the existence of at least one allosteric site that might be detectable
in electric organ membranes by measuring its ability to displace
radiolabeled compounds which specifically bind to the nicotinic
receptor ion channel (Eldefrawi et al., 1980
).
We carried out 3H-MCC binding displacement
experiments with all three compounds under identical conditions to
facilitate quantitative comparisons between them. Although the rank
order of binding affinities, nicotine
anabaseine> anabasine
(table 2), were in excellent agreement with the rank order of potencies
shown in table 3, the Ki and
EC50 concentrations for each alkaloid were quite
different. These differences arise from the fact that the steady-state
binding assay measures the affinity of the desensitized receptor,
whereas the functional assay measures the affinity of the activateable receptor. It is interesting that the ratio,
EC50/Ki for
anabaseine was only 131, compared to a ratio of 3410 for nicotine.
Anabaseine actions on PC12 cells and parasympathetic neurons.
On PC12 cell receptors anabaseine displayed a potency similar to
nicotine and anabasine when the extent of ionization was taken into
consideration, and the maximal responses (data not shown) were nearly
identical with that of carbachol. The uncorrected EC50 value of 29 µM for nicotine stimulation of
86Rb efflux is in excellent agreement with other
reported nicotine EC50 values for these cells (29 µM, Kemp and Edge, 1987
; 20 µM, Lukas, 1989). However, our
observation that the maximal effect of nicotine on PC12 cells is
comparable with the 1 mM carbamylcholine response differs from some
previously reported data that indicated that nicotine's maximal effect
was significantly less than the effect of 1 mM carbamylcholine (Lukas
and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas, 1989). Several factors, such as differences in
the composition or degree of expression of nicotinic receptors between
different PC12 cultures, could possibly contribute to such a
difference. PC12 cells express other nicotinic receptor subunits
besides alpha4 and beta3 (Rogers et
al., 1992
). PC12 alpha7 receptors bind BTX, but
probably have at most, only a small contribution to the rubidium fluxes
we measured over a 1-min interval (Kemp and Edge, 1987
; Rogers et
al., 1991
).
Anabaseine apparently relaxes the colon smooth muscle indirectly by
stimulating nicotinic receptors on paraympathetic neurons of the
myenteric plexus, because TTX blocked its effect. TTX blocks the
stimulatory effect of nicotine on guinea pig ileum smooth muscle by
depressing the electrical excitability of myenteric plexus neurons
(Torocsik et al., 1991
). Anabaseine and nicotine were much
more potent than anabasine in relaxing the rat colon (table 3). Haefely
(1974)
also reported that anabasine was only about 4% as potent as
nicotine in affecting the cat superior cervical ganglion preparation.
The maximal relaxing effect of anabaseine was very similar to that of
nicotine, as shown in figure 13. Both anabaseine and nicotine displayed
much higher potencies (32- and 25-fold, respectively) in relaxing the
rat colon muscle relative to their potency in stimulating
86Rb efflux from PC12 cells. Our data suggest
that the nicotinic receptors in these two autonomic preparations are
probably different in their subunit compositions, and warrants further
investigation. Also, Bencherif et al. (1996)
reported quite
different nicotinoid affinities for PC12 cells and guinea pig ileum
nicoinic receptors and suggested that myenteric plexus receptors are
composed of alpha3, beta2 and possibly a third
subunit.
Whole animal actions of anabaseine.
At an initial stage of
this investigation the rat prostration response to lateral ventricular
injection of nicotinic agonists was selected as an in vivo
bioassay for demonstrating neuronal nicotinic agonist activity of
anabaseine. The in vivo agonistic and antagonistic
activities of a variety of nicotinic compounds, neurotransmitters and
toxins had previously been demonstrated using this assay (Abood
et al., 1981
). The prostration response displayed pronounced
stereo-specificity for the (S)-form of nicotine, as had been observed
in radioligand binding experiments with the brain high nicotine
affinity binding site. Because displacement of BTX binding to low
affinity receptors shows little stereospecificity (Wonnacott, 1986
),
the existing data suggest that alpha7 type receptors do not
play a major role in causing this prostration response. Abood et
al. (1981)
reported that i.c.v. injection of hexamethonium or
mecamylamine immediately preceding nicotine administration partially
inhibited its prostrating action. They also reported that
preadministration of BTX or TC failed to inhibit the action of
prostrating action of nicotine, although TC injected alone caused
seizures.
In our prostrations assays anabaseine was approximately equipotent with
nicotine, when expressed in terms of the total µmol amount of cyclic
iminium form of anabaseine injected. This suggests that the nicotinic
receptor mediating prostration behavior is not the
alpha4-beta2 type, because this receptor subtype
displays much higher (>10X) affinity for nicotine than for anabaseine
(table 2). Both DHBE and mecamylamine antagonized the prostrating
action of i.c.v. anabaseine. DMAB-anabaseine and other 3-substituted anabaseine derivatives are alpha7 partial agonists but
antagonists at alpha3-beta4 and other nicotinic
receptors (Kem and Papke, 1992
; Papke et al., 1994
; de
Fiebre et al., 1995
). Although the large dose of
DMAB-anabaseine failed to cause prostration, it did inhibit the
prostrating action of nicotine (fig. 14). Thus, our results and those
of Abood et al. (1981)
suggest that the nicotinic
cholinergic receptors mediating the nicotinic prostration are neither
the alpha7 nor the alpha4-beta2 types.
The alpha3-beta4 subtype is a candidate receptor
for mediating prostration in the rat, because nicotine and anabaseine
were found to be of very similar potency (table 3) in stimulating PC12
cell rubidium efflux through nicotinic receptor channels, which are
generally considered to be predominantly the
alpha3-beta4 combination. This autonomic receptor
subtype also displays stereospecificity in its interactions with the
two isomers of nicotine (Madhok and Sharp, 1992
). Other receptor
subunit combinations such as alpha3-beta2 are
also possibly involved. Further experiments with compounds selective
for particular nicotinic receptor subtypes may assist in the
identification of the nicotinic receptors mediating this behavior.
Preferential actions of the three alkaloids upon particular
nicotinic receptors.
To compare nicotinic agonists in molecular
terms, it is necessary to quantitatively express potencies in terms of
the concentration of the active form of each compound. This can be
estimated with knowledge of the bulk pH of the saline and the pKa of
the ionizable group. Fixed negative charges might alter the local pH at
the ACh recognition site, so that it may differ from that of the bulk pH (Stauffer and Karlin, 1994
). For instance, a slightly lower local pH
at the ACh recognition site would enhance agonist ionization and
increase the estimated potencies of secondary and tertiary amine
compounds relative to a quaternary ammonium salt like carbamylcholine. Correction for the local pH effect would probably not greatly affect
the potency comparisons of the non-quaternary compounds in table 1.
Our examination of the relative potencies and affinities of these
closely related compounds provides useful insights for designing nicotinic compounds selective for a particular receptor subtype. Among
the three compounds, the anabaseine structure seems optimal for strong
neuronal alpha7 and neuromuscular agonist activities, although the nicotine structure seems optimal for designing
alpha4-beta2 selective compounds. The anabasine
structure, because of its low neuromuscular potency, would serve as a
good model for designing alpha7-selective compounds.
Structural comparison of anabaseine with the two tobacco
alkaloids.
Both nicotine and anabasine possess a tetrahedral
chiral carbon at position 2 of the saturated ring, whereas the same
carbon atom in anabaseine is part of a trigonal imine bond whose pi
electrons are conjugated with those of the pyridyl ring. Conformational analyses predict that the saturated ring is twisted approximately 90 degrees out of the plane of the pyridyl ring in nicotine and anabasine
(Whidby and Seeman, 1976
; Seeman, 1984
), although the two rings of
anabaseine are coplanar (Prokai et al., in preparation).
The electropositive N-methyl group of nicotine will be in the same
plane as the 3-pyridyl ring, which makes its presumed receptor-facing surface more similar to that of anabaseine. However, anabasine is
predicted to lack a positive charged group in the same plane as its
pyridyl ring. Analyses of anabaseine indicate that its two rings are
co-planar. The neuromuscular nicotinic receptor ACh recognition sites
(there are two, one for each alpha subunit) apparently
interact most readily with a positively charged group that resides
within the same plane as the pyridyl ring. The neuronal alpha7 ACh recognition sites apparently do not have this
coplanarity requirement. Anabaseine and anabasine readily activate this
receptor type relative to nicotine, perhaps because their cationic,
unmethylated nitrogens are able to make more intimate contact with the
alpha7 receptor ACh recognition sites.
Because anabasine and nicotine are thought to possess similar preferred
conformations (ring twists) in solution, their differing alpha4-beta2 affinity is probably due to some
other chemical differences between the two molecules. We suggest that
optimal receptor binding to this receptor occurs when the ligand
possesses an N-methyl substituent. Also, other experiments have shown
that the greater size of the piperidine ring in anabasine relative to
the pyrrolidine ring of nicotine also reduces its interaction with this
receptor (Kem et al., unpublished results).
The ligand binding requirements we observed for the
parasympathetic-type nicotinic receptors in the rat colon myenteric
plexus most closely resembled the neuromuscular receptor requirements. Both receptors displayed relatively strong affinities for nicotine and
anabaseine, but a much lower affinity for anabasine.
Comparison of anabaseine with 3-substituted anabaseines.
Our
study now provides a foundation for understanding the pharmacological
properties of the benzylidene and cinnamylidene derivatives of
anabaseines, including DMAB-, DMXB- and DMAC-anabaseines, which
preferentially stimulate neuronal nicotinic receptors containing alpha7 subunits (Kem et al., 1994c
; Meyer
et al., 1994
; Papke et al., 1994
; de Fiebre
et al., 1995
) and enhance cognitive behavior (Woodruff-Pak
et al., 1994
; Meyer et al., 1994
; Arendash
et al., 1995b
; Bjugstad et al., in press). As
with anabaseine, these compounds display high affinity and efficacy on
alpha7 receptors but low affinity and efficacy with
alpha4-beta2 receptors. Thus, the 3-substitution of anabaseine merely increases further an alpha7
vs. alpha4-beta2 preferential activity
already present in anabaseine. 3-Substituted anabaseines also lack
significant agonist activity on peripheral nicotinic receptors of the
autonomic and neuromuscular types (Kem et al., 1994c
). It is
extremely interesting that the addition of a 3-substituent to
anabaseine seems to diminish its peripheral nervous system and
alpha4-beta2 stimulation without reducing central alpha7 stimulation. This is probably the major
pharmacodynamic adv