 |
Introduction |
Nicotine-evoked
[3H]DA release from striatal synaptosomes is mediated by
a receptor exhibiting nicotinic pharmacology (Rapier et al.,
1988
, 1990
; Grady et al., 1992
, 1994
; Rowell and Hillebrand, 1994
; El-Bizri and Clarke, 1994
; Lippiello et al., 1995
) and
is largely dependent upon calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels (Soliakov et al., 1995
; Turner et al.,
1993
). NIC-stimulated [3H]DA release from rodent striatal
synaptosomes is biphasic with one component being a transient response
with micromolar affinity for L-NIC and substantial initial
release, and the other, a persistent response of low nanomolar affinity
for L-NIC but low initial release (Grady et al.,
1994
). The persistent response does not require previous transient
response; i.e., it is not a residual or secondary effect of
high concentrations of L-NIC (Rowell, 1995
; Grady et al., 1994
). The persistent release is dependent on external
calcium and is blocked by DH
E, which indicates that it is a
nicotinic response requiring calcium influx (Rowell, 1995
).
It is well established that nAChRs exist in multiple forms with
somewhat different pharmacology depending on the subunit composition (McGehee and Role, 1995
; Sargent, 1993
). Clear evidence of different pharmacology for agonists and antagonists has been demonstrated for
different combinations of subtypes expressed in Xenopus
oocytes (Luetje and Patrick, 1991
; Luetje et al., 1993
;
Cachelin and Jaggi, 1991
; Gross et al., 1991
; Cachelin and
Rust, 1994
; Gerzanich et al., 1995
; McGehee and Role, 1995
).
Electrophysiological measurements of agonist and antagonist potency for
nAChRs in rat medial habenula, interpeduncular nucleus, superior
cervical ganglion and hippocampus have shown that signals can be
differentiated on the basis of pharmacology (Mulle and Changeux, 1990
;
Mulle et al., 1991
; Covernton et al., 1994
;
Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1993
, 1995
). These potency variations are
thought to reflect differences in subtype composition. Functional
responses of nAChRs measured by ion flux and neurotransmitter release
from brain slices, cell lines and synaptosomes also differ pharmacologically (Wonnacott et al., 1995
; Lukas, 1993
; Wong
et al., 1995
; Sacaan et al., 1995
, 1996
;
Gopalakrishnan et al., 1996
; Clarke and Reuben, 1996
).
For a subtype to form functional presynaptic receptors on dopaminergic
terminals in striatum, the message should be detectable in substantia
nigra. Message for alpha-3, alpha-4,
alpha-5, beta-2 and beta-3 has been
shown to exist in substantia nigra of mice (Marks et al.,
1992
; Marks, M. J., unpublished results); therefore, it is possible
that the transient and persistent phases of [3H]DA
release from mouse striatal synaptosomes are the result of stimulation
of two different subtypes of nAChR. In this case, the persistent and
transient responses may express different pharmacologies. Alternatively, the two responses could be mediated by a single receptor
which exists in two states. Such a two-state desensitizing model was
originally proposed by Katz and Thesleff (1957)
(see also Ochoa
et al., 1989
; Changeux, 1990
), and subsequently this two-state model was shown to adequately explain the binding properties of L-[3H]NIC to rat brain membrane (Lippiello
et al., 1987
). Support for the single-receptor hypothesis
comes from the slow onset of the persistent response (Rowell, 1995
),
and the ability of low concentrations of L-NIC to
antagonize the transient response evoked by higher concentrations of
the agonist (Grady et al., 1994
; Lippiello et
al., 1995
). To determine whether it is likely that the two phases
of [3H]DA release are the result of stimulation of two
different receptor populations or kinetic manifestations of one
receptor subtype, the pharmacology of the transient and persistent
phases of agonist-induced [3H]DA release were compared.
 |
Methods |
Materials.
The following compounds were products of Sigma
Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO: acetylcholine iodide (ACh), cytisine
(CYT), (+)-nicotine-(+)-di-p-toluoyltartrate (D-NIC), carbachol iodide (CARB), tetramethylammonium
iodide (TMA), atropine sulfate (ATR), hexamethonium bromide (HEX),
decamethonium bromide (DEC), d-tubocurarine chloride (dTC),
sodium chloride, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium
sulfate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, D-(+)-glucose,
ascorbic acid, pargyline and diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP).
Nicotine hydrogen (+)-tartrate (L-NIC) was obtained from
BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole, England. Anatoxin-a hydrochloride (ATX),
-bungarotoxin (
BTX), (+)-epibatidine-L-tartrate (EPI), methylcarbamylcholine chloride (MeCARB),
dihydro-
-erythroidine hydrobromide (DH
E) and methyllycaconitine
citrate (MLA) were products of Research Biochemicals International,
Natick, MA. Sucrose and
N-[2-hydroxyethyl]-piperazine-N
-[2-ethanesulfonate] hemisodium salt (HEPES) were obtained from Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN.
Mecamylamine (MEC) was a gift from Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratory, Rahway, NJ. Econo-Safe scintillation cocktail was purchased
from Research Products International Corp., Mt. Prospect, IL.
[7,8-3H]Dopamine (40-60 Ci/mmol) and
[N-methyl-3H]L-nicotine (75 Ci/mmol) were
obtained from Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL.
Animals.
Mice of the C57BL/6J/Ibg strain obtained from the
breeding colony at the Institute for Behavioral Genetics (Boulder, CO), were maintained on a 12-hr light/12-hr dark cycle (lights on from 7 A.M. to 7 P.M.), and had free access to food
and water. Females between the ages of 60 and 90 days were used. All
animal procedures were in accordance with the NIH Guide for Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the local
animal care committee.
For chronic treatment experiments, mice were anesthetized by injection
of pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and chloral hydrate (100 mg/kg) and a
cannula of silastic tubing was implanted in the right jugular vein by
the method of Barr et al. (1979)
. Mice were transferred to
individual treatment cages (15 × 15 × 30 cm) after 3 to 5 hr recovery time. The cannulas were connected to polyethylene tubing attached to glass syringes mounted on an Infusion Pump (Harvard Instruments, South Natick, MA), and continuous infusion with sterile saline was started. After 2 days of saline infusion half the mice were
infused with 2 mg/kg/hr L-NIC for a day and then 4 mg/kg/hr L-NIC for 9 to 10 days. The rest of the mice were infused
with saline for the whole treatment period. Infusion was discontinued 15 hr before synaptosome preparation. This time period allowed for
total metabolism and elimination of nicotine (Petersen et al., 1984
).
Synaptosome preparation.
A crude P2 synaptosomal pellet was
prepared by homogenization of the striatal tissue from one or two mice
in 1 ml of 0.32 M sucrose buffered with 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) at 4°C
with 16 strokes by hand in a glass-Teflon homogenizer. The homogenate
was diluted to 3 ml with the HEPES-buffered sucrose and centrifuged at
3000 × g for 10 min. The S1 supernátant was then
centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The resulting P2
pellet was resuspended in perfusion buffer (128 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM KCl,
3.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM
MgSO4·7H2O, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM
glucose, 1 mM ascorbate, 0.01 mM pargyline).
L-[3H]Nicotine
binding.
A portion of the P2 synaptosomal preparation from each
mouse in the chronic treatment study was frozen (
20°C) for assay
after completion of the study. Particulate fractions were prepared from P2 synaptosomal preparations combined from two animals. Assays were
conducted as described previously (Marks et al., 1993a
) with 20.8 ± 1.3 nM L-[3H]NIC purified by the
method of Romm et al. (1990)
, with a 30 min incubation at
22°C. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 µM
L-NIC.
[3H]Dopamine uptake.
Synaptosomes
from one mouse suspended in 0.8 ml perfusion buffer were incubated at
37°C for 10 min. [3H]DA was added (4 µCi for an
approximate final concentration of 0.1 µM) and the suspension was
incubated for an additional 5 min. Aliquots (0.08-0.09 ml) were
collected with mild suction onto 7-mm-diameter type A/E glass-fiber
filters cut from larger sheets (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) and
washed once with 0.5 ml perfusion buffer. These filters were then
transferred to the perfusion apparatus. For experiments with ACh as
agonist, the synaptosomes were treated with 100 µM DFP during the
uptake procedure.
Perfusion and release.
The perfusion apparatus has been
described previously (Grady et al., 1992
). For these
experiments, all conducted at room temperature, synaptosomes on 7-mm
filters were placed on top of 13-mm-type A/E glass-fiber filters
(Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor MI) and perfused with buffer at a rate of
0.6 ml/min for 10 min before fraction collection was started. Fractions
were collected for 18 or 30 sec depending on the experiment. Released
radioactivity was primarily [3H]DA (Rapier et
al., 1988
).
Data analysis.
Each sample was plotted as cpm vs.
fraction number or time. An example of such data is shown in figure
1. Basal release was calculated as a single exponential
decay, f = a·e
b·t,
with fractions collected before and after agonist exposure (first 5 and
last 7 fractions of fig. 1A). Curves were fit using the nonlinear least
squares algorithm in SigmaPlot 5.0 (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).
The calculated base line at time t was subtracted from total
cpm at time t for each fraction and the resulting cpm released above base line were normalized to base line at time t to give units of release per fraction ([total cpm
base line]/base line). For short agonist exposures (not illustrated
here), units of release for fractions with cpm above base line during
the agonist exposure were summed for total release. For longer
exposures of agonist, [3H]DA release is biphasic (Grady
et al., 1994
), so data as units per fraction were fit to a
double-exponential equation:
|
(1)
|
with use of SigmaPlot 5.0 where f is measured
release; vT and vP are
maximum release for the first (transient) and second (persistent)
phases, respectively; dT and
dP are desensitization rates for the first and
second phases; and t is the time of agonist exposure. Figure
1B illustrates this curve fit for four experiments where synaptosomes
were exposed to 10 µM L-NIC for 10 min. For purposes of
the curve fit, the first fraction is taken as the peak of response, and
the time of each fraction is taken as the midpoint of the interval of
collection.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
[3H]DA release stimulated by
L-NIC. Graph A represents data from one filter of striatal
synaptosomes exposed to 10 µM L-NIC for 10 min starting
at the time indicated. Fractions were collected every 30 sec. The
dashed line is the base line calculated from the first five and the
last seven fractions. Graph B presents data from graph A and three
other experiments plotted as units of release per fraction
versus time of L-NIC exposure starting at
the peak fraction. The line drawn is the fit to a double-exponential decay equation (see "Methods" for details of calculations).
|
|
For experiments in which data for several concentrations of an agonist
were collected under conditions of long (5-10 min) exposure, the
following method was used to determine activation constants and maximum
initial release for each process. The parameters vT and vP were calculated
as described above for various concentrations of an agonist. These data
were then fit by SigmaPlot 5.0 to the Hill equation:
|
(2)
|
where f = vT or
vP, A = agonist concentration,
Km = agonist concentration at half-maximal
release (referred to as KT and KP for transient and persistent release,
respectively), Vm = maximal release for each
(referred to as VT and
VP, respectively) and n = the
Hill coefficient (referred to as n for transient release and
n
for persistent release). All parameters are reported ± S.E.M.
An alternative method was used which enabled simultaneous calculation
of maximum initial release, activation constants and desensitization
rates for both phases. Units released per fraction were calculated as
described above. Means for several experiments for 12 to 15 time points
were determined for six to nine concentrations of an agonist. These
data were then fit by SigmaPlot 5.0 to the Hill equation with
double-exponential decay where the Hill coefficients were set to 1:
|
(3)
|
where A is the agonist concentration,
VT and VP are the maximum
release values for the two processes, KT and
KP are the activation constants for the two
processes, DT and DP are
the desensitization rates for the two processes, n and
n
are the Hill coefficients and t is time in
minutes of agonist exposure at the midpoint of each fraction. The
results of this calculation are illustrated in figure 2
with L-NIC as agonist.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Simultaneous fit of [3H]DA release
data for multiple concentrations of L-NIC. Data points are
means of four experiments calculated as units of release per fraction
plotted versus time from the peak fraction. Lines are
the fit by SigmaPlot 5.0 to the Hill equation for two processes, with
both processes decaying exponentially, setting the Hill coefficients to
1 (see "Methods" for equation).
|
|
To determine Ki values for nicotinic antagonists
for the two phases of agonist-stimulated [3H]DA release,
data were collected by use of 1 µM L-NIC as agonist with
an exposure time of 10 min. The concentration of antagonist was varied
on different filters within each experiment and synaptosomes were
exposed to antagonist for 12 min before and during the
L-NIC exposure. Base lines were calculated, and units of
release per fraction were determined as above. These data were fit to
the double-exponential decay equation to determine maximum release for
the two processes (vT and
vP) in the presence of various concentrations of
inhibitor. These parameters were compared with controls from the same
experiments to determine % control response. To determine Ki values for the two processes, the % control
data were fit by use of SigmaPlot 5.0 to the equations for competitive
inhibition:
|
(4)
|
or noncompetitive inhibition:
|
(5)
|
where n = L-NIC concentration (1 µM), I = antagonist concentration V = Vmax for L-NIC calculated from
agonist parameters setting 1 µM L-NIC response to 100 (171 and 108.5 for transient and persistent phases, respectively),
Ka = activation constant for L-NIC
for each process (KT = 0.71 and
KP = 0.085, respectively) and
Ki = the inhibition constant for the antagonist.
The parameters used for L-NIC were calculated by the
simultaneous fit procedure (see fig. 2).
 |
Results |
A preliminary characterization of the effects of nicotinic
antagonists and external calcium and cadmium on both transient and
persistent phases was conducted by a long exposure to
L-NIC. The results presented in figure 3, A
and B, show that both transient and persistent responses are dependent
on external calcium and are almost totally inhibited by 200 µM
cadmium. Both responses are inhibited by the nicotinic antagonists
DH
E (fig. 3C) and MEC (fig. 3D), and neither are inhibited by
BTX
(fig.3E) or the muscarinic antagonist, ATR (fig.3F).

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effects of calcium, cadmium and various
antagonists on L-NIC-evoked [3H]DA release.
Data presented are from representative single filters and, for all
graphs, are plotted as total cpm calculated base line for each
fraction and are not normalized to base line. Data for each filter are
offset by 1000 cpm for clarity. The concentration and duration of
L-NIC exposure are as indicated on each plot. For graphs A
and B, 18-sec fractions were collected. For graphs C through F, 30-sec
fractions were collected. For graph E, synaptosomes were incubated at
37°C for 30 min with or without 1 µM BTX before the addition of
[3H]DA.
|
|
In experiments with synaptosomes as a model, depletion of
neurotransmitter and of labeled tracer versus endogenous
compound are always questions. To assess the extent of these possible
problems, synaptosomes were exposed for 1 min to 10 µM
L-NIC at various time intervals after uptake was complete.
Figure 4 (inset graph) shows that, although
[3H]DA is being released continually during the
perfusion, the base line normalizing procedure adequately corrects for
any decrease in specific activity over the course of 40 to 50 min, in
the absence of prior agonist exposure. The possibility exists that the
two phases of release are representative of two pools of DA-containing vesicles with differing specific activity. If two such pools exist, the
pool with higher specific activity would be depleted by the transient
release, leaving the pool with lower specific activity to be released
as the persistent phase. This appears to be a change in the amount of
DA released when actually it is only a change in specific activity. In
this case, the transient release would not be recoverable without
uptake of additional [3H]DA. Figure 4 presents a series
of experiments in which a 5-min exposure to 10 µM L-NIC
was followed by a second 5-min exposure with varying intervals between
the two exposures. The two phases both recover, although in 20 min the
transient phase has recovered to 55%, whereas the persistent phase has
recovered to 80% of the original value by use of the base-line
normalizing calculation. Therefore, it is likely that the two phases of
release are dependent upon some aspects of function of the nicotinic
receptor or the release mechanism, rather than any effect of depletion.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Recovery of response and effect of base-line
depletion. Data points are means of three to four experiments. For the
inset graph, fractions were collected every minute and
L-NIC exposure was for 1 min. Base lines have been
subtracted and data normalized to base line for units of release. Data
are offset by 2 units for clarity. For recovery, all synaptosomes were
exposed to 10 µM L-NIC for 5 min (initial peak), and the
exposure was repeated after 2-, 5-, 10- or 20-min recovery by perfusion
with the buffer. Data are offset by 2 units for clarity. Fractions were
collected every 30 sec and data calculated as for the inset graph.
|
|
To gain information on whether transient and persistent
[3H]DA release may be mediated by different types of
nicotinic receptor, the effects of antagonist concentration on initial
rates for transient (vT) and persistent
(vP) responses were determined. Synaptosomes were exposed to various concentrations of antagonist for 12 min before
and during exposure to 1 µM L-NIC for 10 min. Data from two to six experiments per concentration were fit to the
double-exponential decay equation to determine
vT and vP. Based on
previously published data on inhibition of [3H]DA release
at 50 µM L-NIC (Grady et al., 1992
) and
inhibition of L-[3H]NIC binding and
86Rb+ efflux (Marks et al., 1993b
)
dTC and DH
E appear to be competitive antagonists. HEX, DEC and MEC
are likely noncompetitive, although DEC may have some competitive
component. MLA is probably competitive in this system (Marks, M. J.,
unpublished results). Inhibition constants were calculated assuming
competitive inhibition for dTC, DH
E and MLA, and noncompetitive
inhibition for HEX and DEC. These results are presented in figure
5. A similar experiment was conducted with the
noncompetitive antagonist MEC. Because this compound is an open-channel
blocker, there is generally some response before the onset of
antagonist action. The curve-fit adds this response to the transient
portion of the release, which leads to an artifactually high
Ki value, so this approach with MEC was
abandoned. Regression analysis (see fig. 5F) for comparison of
Ki values for inhibition of transient
versus persistent response for five antagonists gave a
correlation coefficient of 0.98 (P < .005) with a slope of 0.89 and an intercept of
0.30. This correlation indicates that the effects
of these antagonists on the transient and persistent phases of
[3H]DA release were similar and could be mediated by the
same receptor.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of L-NIC-stimulated
[3H]DA release by nicotinic antagonists. Data points for
graphs A through E are means ± S.E.M. or range
(n = 2-6 experiments) of
vT ( ) or vP
( ) calculated by double-exponential fit of data expressed as units
per fraction for 3H-release evoked by 1 µM
L-NIC in the presence of various concentrations of
antagonist expressed as % control response in the absence of antagonist. Lines are curve fits of the data shown (see "Methods"). Ki values (in µM) determined from these
curve fits for inhibition of transient response
(vT) are: HEX, 11.0 ± 3.0; DH E,
0.038 ± 0.018; DEC, 10.1 ± 2.2; MLA, 0.036 ± 0.013;
dTC, 0.54 ± 0.17. Ki values (in µM)
for inhibition of the persistent response
(vP) are: HEX, 28.8 ± 8.7; DH E,
0.030 ± 0.010; DEC, 29.1 ± 10.9; MLA, 0.13 ± 0.03;
dTC, 0.84 ± 0.39. Graph F shows the regression analysis comparing
these Ki values. Parameters for the
regression line are: slope, 0.89; intercept, 0.30; correlation
coefficient, 0.98 (P < .005).
|
|
The effects of prolonged exposure to nine nicotinic agonists were also
investigated. Dose-response curves for each agonist were determined by
10-min exposure of aliquots of synaptosomes to various concentrations
of agonist. The results obtained at each concentration were fit to the
double-exponential decay equation as described under "Methods."
These curves for the transient phase release
(vT) and the persistent phase
(vP) for the nine agonists are presented in
figure 6. All nine nicotinic agonists activated both
persistent and transient responses in a concentration-dependent, saturable manner. Because of the tendency for decreased response at
high agonist concentrations (e.g., 100 µM
L-NIC), data were fit to the Hill equation setting
Vmax to the highest actual release obtained.
Parameters ± S.E.M. for the curve fits are given in table
1. Comparison of parameters VT
and VP indicate that several of these compounds
are partial agonists. Those that have the lowest efficacy for transient
release (CYT and D-NIC) are also partial agonists for
persistent release; however, the difference between the most and least
efficacious agonist is greater for transient release (about 5-fold)
than persistent release (about 2-fold). The ratio of activation
concentrations for transient and persistent release
(KT/KP) varied about
6-fold with L-NIC and D-NIC having a noticeably
higher ratio and CYT and ACh a lower ratio than the other compounds.
None of the Hill coefficients calculated were significantly higher than
1; most tended to be lower than 1, perhaps because of the
curve-broadening effect of using averaged data points or the
uncertainty of Vmax values.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Dose-response curves for nicotinic agonist
stimulation of transient and persistent [3H]DA release.
Data points are means ± S.E.M. or range (n = 2-6 experiments) for vT ( ) or
vP ( ) calculated by double-exponential fit of data expressed as units per fraction (see "Methods" for details). Lines drawn are curve fits by SigmaPlot 5.0 to the Hill equation setting Vm to the highest actual
release achieved and omitting any decreasing values at high
concentrations of agonist from the curve fits.
|
|
Calculating desensitization rates by an analogous procedure (fitting
dT and dP to the Hill
equation), proved less successful because of high errors in the
desensitization parameters calculated from lower concentrations of
agonists. To reduce these errors, simultaneous fit of data from all
concentrations of an agonist was performed as described under "Data
Analysis," setting the Hill coefficients to 1. Parameters ± S.E.M. calculated by this method for all nine agonists are given in
table 3. The maximum release parameters (VT and
VP) calculated by the simultaneous fits (table
2) were all similar to those estimated previously (table
1). Values for potency of stimulating transient release (KT) for all nine agonists, as well as values
for potency of stimulating persistent release
(KP) for six of the agonists, were not
significantly different from the previous calculation. Values of
KP for three agonists, D-NIC, CARB
and TMA, were significantly higher by this curve-fitting procedure as
indicated in table 2. Maximal desensitization rates for the transient
response varied about 2-fold. The rates measured for ACh, TMA and CARB
were significantly higher than rates of desensitization for the other
agonists. Maximal desensitization rates for the persistent response
varied less than 2-fold among the agonists, and none were significantly
different by one-way analysis of variance.
One of the properties of a desensitizing nAChR is that response can be
inhibited by low concentrations of agonist. This property has been
established for L-NIC-induced [3H]DA release
from mouse striatal synaptosomes (Grady et al., 1994
). To
determine inhibition constants for agonists as inhibitors of transient
release, the following protocol was used. After uptake of
[3H]DA, the synaptosomes were perfused with buffer
containing varying concentrations of agonist for 15 to 20 min. This
interval is approximately ten times the t1/2 for
onset (Grady et al., 1994
). Release was then evoked by
exposure to 10 µM L-NIC for 30 sec. The short test stimulation time was chosen to minimize the persistent response component. Not only is the ratio of transient to persistent response highest at early time points, the persistent phase has a somewhat slower onset (Rowell, 1995
; Grady et al., 1994
). The low
concentration of agonist present before and during test exposure
stimulated some persistent response which is included in the base line
and therefore subtracted from the transient response. As a result, this
method measures inhibition of the transient response only. Units of
release for the L-NIC test exposure were calculated as described under "Data Analysis" and are presented as % control in
figure 7. Figure 8 presents the
correlation of low concentration inhibition of transient response
(KIA) with activation of persistent response
(KP from table 2). The correlation coefficient
is 0.99 with an intercept of
0.79 and a slope of 0.95, which
indicates a strong correlation between these parameters but not
identity (slope and correlation coefficient are close to 1, but
intercept is not 0).

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Agonist inhibition of transient response. Nine
agonists were tested for their ability to inhibit [3H]DA
release evoked by a 30-sec exposure to 10 µM L-NIC.
Synaptosomes were exposed to nanomolar concentrations of agonist as
indicated for 15 to 20 min before the test exposure to
L-NIC, also in the presence of nanomolar agonist. Data were
calculated as total units of release and expressed as % control
response in the absence of prior agonist exposure. Each point
represents the mean ± S.E.M. for three to six experiments. Lines
drawn are curve fits for inhibition (see "Methods" for equation).
Inhibition constants for agonists (KIA in
nM) calculated from these curve fits are: L-NIC, 19.7 ± 4.9; ACh, 38.4 ± 8.1; D-NIC, 209 ± 28; EPI,
0.060 ± 0.013; ATX, 5.1 ± 0.8; CYT, 4.2 ± 1.5; CARB,
580 ± 269; MeCARB, 47.5 ± 15.0, TMA, 1081 ± 147.
|
|

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Correlation of agonist inhibition of transient
response with agonist activation of persistent response. Inhibition
constants (KIA) for low-concentration
agonist inhibition of transient [3H]DA release by
L-NIC (see fig. 7) are plotted versus
activation constants (KP) for stimulation of
persistent [3H]DA release by the agonists (see table 2).
The line is a regression line (SigmaPlot 5.0) with the following
parameters: slope, 0.95; intercept, 0.79; correlation coefficient,
0.99 (P < .005).
|
|
To assess whether chronic L-NIC treatment changes the
release profile, [3H]DA release was measured from
synaptosomes prepared from mice chronically treated with
L-NIC or saline (n = 11 per group) as described under "Methods." Individual animals were assayed by a
10-min exposure to 10 µM L-NIC. Data were expressed as
units of release per fraction as means of two to four filters per
animal and were fit to a double-exponential equation (see "Data
Analysis" and fig. 1). Figure 9 shows the data as
mean ± S.E.M. and curve fits for NIC- and saline-treated mice. In
addition, L-[3H]NIC binding was measured on a
portion of the P2 striatal synaptosomes prepared from each mouse. For
this measurement, pooled tissue from two mice were assayed
(n = 5 determinations per group) with 20 nM
L-[3H]NIC (a concentration close to
saturation for binding). Parameters calculated are presented in table
3. The parameter vT was
significantly different (P < .05) between groups. Although
differences for VP were not highly significant
(P < .20), the decrease to 82% of saline control value indicated
a decrease in function similar to that for VT.
Uptake and base-line release before exposure to L-NIC
during the assay did not differ between groups; however, [3H]DA remaining in the synaptosomes at the end of the
assay was higher for the L-NIC-treated group, probably
reflecting the decreased release. Binding of
L-[3H]NIC for the L-NIC-treated
group was not significantly higher than for the saline-treated group.

View larger version (K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
[3H]DA release from striatal
synaptosomes of chronically treated mice. Two groups of mice were
chronically infused through cannulas implanted in the jugular vein,
with either saline or L-NIC (4 mg/kg/hr) for 9 to 10 days.
Striatal synaptosomes were prepared from individual mice after a 15-hr
withdrawal, and [3H]DA release was measured with a 10-min
exposure to 10 µM L-NIC. Data are mean ± S.E.M.
(n = 11 mice per group) of agonist-stimulated units
of [3H]DA released per fraction and plotted
versus the midpoint of the time of collection of the
fraction (see fig. 1B). Lines are curve fits to a double-exponential
decay equation (see "Methods").
|
|
 |
Discussion |
Nicotinic agonist-induced release of [3H]DA
from striatal synaptosomes consists of two distinct phases, one
transient and the other persistent. Most of the [3H]DA
release from rodent synaptosomes stimulated by micromolar concentrations of L-NIC is transient, is blocked by
nicotinic antagonists and requires external calcium (Grady et
al., 1992
; Soliakov et al., 1995
; Rowell et
al., 1987
; El-Bizri and Clarke, 1994
). The persistent response,
remaining after the transient portion has desensitized, is also
calcium-dependent and inhibited by DH
E (figs. 3 and 5;
cf. Rowell, 1995
). In addition, both responses are inhibited
by MEC at approximately the same concentrations (fig. 3D), as expected
for a noncompetitive antagonist, but not by atropine or
-BTX. The
absolute dependence of both responses on external calcium and the total
blockade of both transient and persistent release by 200 µM cadmium
(fig. 3) indicate that both phases are mediated by voltage-sensitive
calcium channels (Miller, 1990
; Rathouz and Berg, 1994
). External
calcium is known to modify the response of some nAChRs; however, this
effect of calcium is not absolute and in fact may be minimal at high
agonist concentrations (Mulle et al., 1992b
). Thus, although
nAChRs can flux calcium (Mulle et al., 1992a
; Vernino
et al., 1994
), it appears that insufficient calcium enters
through the nAChR to directly promote release of [3H]DA.
The desensitization time course may be a function of the release
mechanism. Desensitization rates were similar for all the compounds
tested for persistent release. Values of desensitization rates for the
transient phase (DT) varied about 2-fold with
three agonists, ACh, CARB and TMA, having significantly higher rates than the other compounds. Similar desensitization rates for
[3H]DA release from rat striatal synaptosomes stimulated
by TMA and L-NIC have been reported (Lippiello et
al., 1995
). Experiments with other agents, such as 20 mM
K+ or 100 µM kainate, which promote [3H]DA
release via calcium-dependent processes but do not involve the nAChR, indicated similar rates of desensitization (Grady, S. R.,
unpublished results). However, a more direct measure of nAChR
desensitization,86Rb+ flux experiments (Marks
et al., 1996
), has shown that neuronal nAChRs do desensitize
but at slightly slower rates than measured by the [3H]DA
release assay. Although these assays may not measure the same receptor
subtype, this result shows that neuronal nAChRs do desensitize as
expected. The observation that the rate of desensitization of the
transient phase of [3H]DA release does not vary from
agonist to agonist and closely resembles the desensitization rate seen
after depolarization could mean that receptor desensitization is not
the rate-limiting step for attenuation of release. For example, there
is evidence for biphasic depletion of cytosolic calcium concentrations
and existence of two calcium sensors (Kao and Schneider, 1986
;
Greengard et al., 1993
; Geppert et al., 1994
;
Littleton and Bellen, 1995
). However, in bovine chromaffin cells that
exhibit a biphasic pattern of release for catecholamines, evidence has
been presented that replenishment of release granules is not the cause
of the biphasic release pattern (McKay and Schneider, 1984
). Several
observations indicate that efficacy and potency parameters measured by
the release assay are indicative of nAChR function. That persistent response is agonist dependent and can occur without prior transient release shows that the persistent phase is not simply the direct result
of biphasic calcium depletion. That transient response can be modulated
by treatment with low concentrations of agonists in the absence of
significant release argues against these parameters being affected by
calcium or vesicle depletion. In addition agonists show a range of
transient efficacy which would be unlikely if these parameters were
determined by calcium channel activity or some function of the release
mechanism.
Data presented here support the concept that both transient and
persistent components of L-NIC-evoked [3H]DA
release are mediated by a single receptor. If the two responses are
mediated by a single type of receptor, some predictions can be made
assuming the kinetics follow the desensitization model of Katz and
Thesleff (1957)
.
If RL is the only opening form of the receptor, the transient
phase of [3H]DA release could be a measure of R
RL
(rate constant, k1) which then desensitizes
via RL
R
L (rate constant, k3).
The persistent phase of release could be a measure of R
L
RL (rate constant, k4). This could occur if the receptor
that mediates dopamine release has a higher ratio of
k4/k3 than previously
studied subtypes of the neuronal nicotinic receptor. For example, if
the ratio of k7/k8 is
about 1:1 as expected from binding studies (Grady et al.,
1994
), the measured Vmax for a functional assay
would be 50% of the theoretical Vmax. If the
ratio of k3/k4 is 10:1, persistent release would be 10% of theoretical
Vmax, or approximately 20% of the measured
Vmax for transient release.
It has been shown for nAChR from Torpedo that Ki
values for competitive antagonists are similar for the
desensitized form, measured by competition binding assays, and the
active form, measured by 22Na+ efflux (Popot
et al., 1976
). The Ki values for
competitive antagonists measured for
[3H]norepinephrine release and
L-[3H]NIC binding in bovine adrenal
chromaffin cells are also similar (Higgins and Berg, 1988
). Therefore,
if the transient and persistent phases of [3H]DA release
are mediated by agonist binding to different forms of the same
receptor, it is likely that Ki values for
inhibition by competitive antagonists as well as noncompetitive
antagonists would be similar. If, however, the two phases of
[3H]DA release are mediated by different receptor
subtypes, Ki would likely be different (Alkondon
and Albuquerque, 1993
; Mulle et al., 1991
; Cachelin and
Rust, 1994
, 1995
; Clarke and Reuben, 1996
). The results (fig. 5) for
five antagonists show that the Ki values are
similar for the two phases of release. Regression analysis yielded a
good correlation (r = 0.98; slope = 0.89;
intercept =
0.30) between Ki values for
the five antagonists for the two phases of release. The slope and
intercept deviate somewhat from expected (1 and 0), which possibly
reflects an error in the assumption that DEC and possibly HEX are
purely noncompetitive inhibitors. Inhibition by these antagonists,
however, is similar enough to conclude that the two processes may be
mediated by the same receptor.
Further support for the same receptor hypothesis is derived from a
comparison of agonist-induced activation of the persistent phase and
agonist-induced desensitization of the transient phase. If the
transient and persistent responses are manifestations of the kinetics
of a single receptor, as opposed to responses of two separate types of
release, the concentrations required to evoke persistent response
(KP) should be correlated with inhibition of the
transient response (KIA), which is produced by
preexposure to low concentrations of agonist. Such a correlation is
expected because both processes require agonist interaction with the
desensitized form of the receptor (the R
R
L step). High
correlation between the activation constants for persistent release
(KP) and the inhibition by low agonist
concentrations of the transient response to L-NIC (KIA) was obtained (fig. 8). Whereas
KP and KIA are highly
correlated, KP is always larger than
KIA (ratio, 6.1 ± 0.7; range, 2.9-8.8). Calculations based on the Katz and Thesleff model described by Marks
et al. (1996)
have shown that KIA
values for inhibition of function are predicted to be higher than
KI values for inhibition of binding. Similar
calculations with ratios of
k3:k4 in the range of
10:1 and other constants set at values determined in experiments reported here and previously (Grady et al., 1994
) indicate
that KP is expected to be larger than
KIA.
A range of efficacy was seen for the nine agonists tested in this
study. For the transient release process, initial release (VT) varied about 5-fold with CYT giving the
lowest response and TMA having the highest transient release.
Persistent release (VP) varied much less (about
2-fold), with D-NIC having the lowest and TMA having the
highest efficacy. In agreement with these data, CYT has been shown to
have lower efficacy than L-NIC for release of
[3H]DA from rat synaptosomes (El Bizri and Clarke, 1994;
Wonnacott et al., 1995
). An initial characterization (Grady
et al., 1992
) indicated that efficacy was similar for
various agonists including L-NIC, CYT, D-NIC,
ACh and CARB. These early experiments with the perfusion system were
conducted with Percoll-purified synaptosomes and without current
improved line washing procedures, which resulted in considerably lower
agonist-stimulated release values than are now achieved. A greater
proportion of the response measured for this initial characterization
was possibly of the persistent phase which varies little in efficacy.
Marks et al. (1993a)
showed that chronic treatment of mice
with 4 mg/kg/hr L-NIC produces a functional down-regulation
of striatal [3H]DA release as measured by a 1-min
exposure to L-NIC. This treatment protocol was repeated in
the experiment reported here, which used a 10-min L-NIC
exposure for the [3H]DA assay and a 15-hr withdrawal from
chronic treatment, a length of time sufficient to clear
L-NIC from the bloodstream of mice (Petersen et
al., 1984
). A small but statistically insignificant increase in
L-[3H]NIC binding in striatum was seen.
Chronic exposure to L-NIC produces a well-documented
up-regulation of L-NIC binding sites in brain. Regional
differences are seen in the amount of up-regulation measured after
chronic treatment, with striatum showing minimal up-regulation (Marks
et al., 1993a
). The results reported here are in agreement
with this previous study. Results of functional assays (fig. 8) show
that both phases of [3H]DA release are decreased by 16 to
18% (P < .05 for the transient phase; P < .20 for the
persistent phase). This result is similar to previously reported
down-regulation of [3H]DA release (Marks et
al., 1993a
) where release was measured with a 1-min exposure to
L-NIC. The data reported here indicate that the
down-regulation of response by chronic treatment affects both transient
and persistent [3H]DA release similarly. Therefore, if
both responses are mediated by one receptor, functional down-regulation
is not produced by locking the receptor in a desensitized state,
because that possibility would have resulted in greatly reduced
transient phase release with increased or no change in persistent
response. Instead, some receptors may be functionally inactive or
partially active as measured by the [3H]DA assay, but
still able to bind L-[3H]NIC. This
interpretation is consistent with the results and conclusions of Peng
et al. (1994)
who investigated functional responses of
4
2 receptors expressed in oocytes and M10 cells chronically
treated with L-NIC.
Assuming that a single type of nAChR is mediating both phases of
[3H]DA release, the question of subtype assignment
arises. Multiple subunits likely coexist in mouse striata as messenger
RNA for alpha-3, alpha-4, alpha-5,
beta-2 and beta-3 has been detected by in
situ hybridization in the substantia nigra of mice (Marks et
al., 1992
; Marks, M. J., unpublished data). Certain assays are
known to measure a particular subtype of nAChR. Binding of L-[3H]NIC to brain membranes correlates well
with the
4
2 form of neuronal nAChR (Whiting et al.,
1991
; Flores et al., 1992
; Lindstrom et al.,
1995
; Gopalakrishnan et al., 1996
) and binding of
[125I]
BTX is a measure of the alpha-7
subunit (Vernallis et al., 1993
; Gotti et al.,
1994
). Parameters measuring effects of nicotinic agonists on
[3H]DA release, KT,
KP (table 2) and KIA
(fig. 7), were compared with KI values for
inhibition of binding of L-[3H]NIC to mouse
thalamic membranes (Marks et al., 1996
) and inhibition of
binding of [125I]
BTX to mouse brain membranes
(unpublished data) by regression analysis (table 4).
High correlations (0.97-0.98) with slopes near 1 were seen for all
[3H]DA release parameters compared with inhibition of
L-[3H]NIC binding. Correlations to
[125I]
BTX binding were lower (0.82-0.87) and similar
to that seen for a comparison of the two binding assays (0.85). A
significant correlation between inhibition of transient release of
[3H]DA from rat striatal synaptosomes and
L-[3H]NIC binding has also been reported for
rat brain (Lippiello et al., 1995
). Because high-affinity
L-[3H]NIC binding measures primarily the
4
2 form of neuronal nAChRs, it is likely that receptors mediating
[3H]DA release in rodent striata contain
alpha-4 and beta-2 subunits.
Another subtype-specific technique is measurement of inhibition by
nBTX. Oocyte experiments with specific nAChR subtypes have shown that
receptors potently inhibited by nBTX are most likely of
3
2
composition (Duvoisin et al., 1989
; Luetje and Patrick, 1991
; Luetje et al., 1990
, 1993
). Previous experiments have
shown that [3H]DA release is completely inhibited by low
concentrations of nBTX (Grady et al., 1992
; Schultz and
Zigmond, 1989
). These data indicate that alpha-3 and
beta-2 subunits are involved in mediating agonist-evoked
[3H]DA release. By functional measurements of receptors
expressed in oocytes, the beta-2 subunit is associated with
partial agonist activity of cytisine (Luetje and Patrick, 1991
).
It has been established that individual neurons can express multiple
subtypes of nAChR (Horch and Sargent, 1995
; Sargent, 1993
; McGehee and
Role, 1995
). In addition, the existence of receptors containing more
than one type of alpha or beta subunit have been proposed for other systems (Colquhoun et al., 1993
;
Vernallis et al., 1993
; Mandelzys et al., 1995
).
The strong pharmacological correlations between the transient and
persistent phases of [3H]DA release from striatal
synaptosomes presented here indicate that both phases are likely
mediated by one type of receptor. The correlations of
[3H]DA release and L-[3H]NIC
binding parameters implicate an
4
2 composition whereas sensitivity to nBTX favors
3
2 subunit containing receptors. It
seems possible that this nAChR contains both an alpha-3 and an alpha-4 as well as beta-2 subunits. Although
correlations of pharmacological parameters can suggest that receptors
mediating two processes are identical, confirmation of the subunit
composition of these receptors must be achieved by other methods.
The authors wish to thank Scott Robinson for assistance with
surgery and chronic treatments, and Jerry Stitzel and Amy Clark for
assistance with L-[3H]NIC binding assays.
Accepted for publication March 6, 1997.
Received for publication September 30, 1996.
ACh, acetylcholine;
ATR, atropine;
ATX, anatoxin-a;
CARB, carbachol;
CYT, cytisine;
DA, dopamine;
DEC, decamethonium;
DFP, diisopropyl fluorophosphate;
DH
E, dihydro-
-erythroidine;
EPI, (+)-epibatidine;
HEPES, N-[2-hydroxyethyl]-piperazine-N
-[2-ethanesulfonate];
HEX, hexamethonium;
MEC, mecamylamine;
MeCARB, methylcarbachol;
MLA, methyllycaconitine;
nAChR, neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor;
nBTX, neuronal bungarotoxin;
NIC, nicotine;
dTC, d-tubocurarine;
TMA, tetramethylammonium.