![]() |
|
|
Vol. 282, Issue 1, 286-293, 1997
Department of Neuropharmacology and Molecular Biology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC (F.C.T., L.R., J.R.), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (J.E.M.), and Parke-Davis Neurosciences Research Centre, Addenbrookes Hospital Site, Cambridge, CB2 2QB, UK (J.H., J.C.H)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study characterized the electroencephalographic (EEG)
effects of the neuroprotective kappa opioids enadoline and PD117302 in conscious, freely moving rats with the use of
computer-assisted spectral analysis (CASA). Enadoline (25-100 µg/kg)
or PD117302 (1.25-5.0 mg/kg) was administered intravenously to rats
implanted with cortical EEG electrodes. Although both drugs produced an immediate, mild sedation, there were no signs of head-weaving or
ataxia, and there was little visual evidence of opioid-like EEG
slow-wave bursts or seizures. Both drugs produced only modest increases
in total EEG power that were not dose dependent. In contrast, CASA
revealed significant dose-dependent frequency shifts in relative power
distributions, thereby identifying distinct kappa opioid
alterations in awake EEG activity; EEG power decreased in the 0- to
4-Hz frequency band with concomitant increases in power measured in the
4- to 8-Hz frequency range. The kappa opioids produced a
dose-dependent consolidation of the EEG waveform centered about a peak
frequency of 5.0 Hz (for enadoline) or 4.8 Hz (for PD117302) and a
significant shift in the mean EEG frequency from 6.6 Hz (predrug) to
6.2 Hz (postdrug). Further CASA revealed significant postdrug decreases
in the edge frequency, mobility and complexity of the EEG. Both drugs
produced moderate increases in the latency to slow-wave sleep (SWS).
Overall, enadoline (ED50 = 18 µg/kg) was ~94 times more
potent than PD117302 (ED50 = 1690 µg/kg) in producing the
kappa EEG profile. Because the kappa-induced EEG changes were stereospecific for the (
)-enantiomers and inhibited by
norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI), the EEG "fingerprint" described in
this study could be attributed to specific activation of brain kappa opioid receptors.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the development of the
kappa opioid benzomorphan analgesics, several putative
kappa ligands expressing varying affinities and
selectivities for kappa vs. mu opioid binding sites have
been developed (Rees, 1992
). The benzomorphan kappa opioids
such as bremazocine and ethylketocyclazocine are recognized to interact with comparable potency at mu opioid sites as well as to
exhibit activity at nonopioid binding sites (Hunter et al.,
1990
; Millan, 1990
). In addition, the relatively selective
nonbenzomorphan kappa opioids such as the prototype
arylacetamide ligands U50,488 and spiradoline have been determined to
possess nonopioid actions and exhibit different pharmacological
profiles for their enantiomers (Hayes et al., 1988
; Meecham
et al., 1989
; Tortella et al., 1990
, Young,
1989
).
In general, kappa opioids share a pharmacological profile in
rodents exhibiting similar analgesic, behavioral, diuretic and EEG
properties (Campi and Clarke, 1995
; Millan, 1990
; Tortella et
al., 1980
) Unfortunately, of those kappa opioids
evaluated in humans, including the benzomorphinans MR2034,
ketocyclazocine and cyclazocine (Haertzen, 1970
; Pfeiffer et
al., 1986
; Kumor et al., 1986
), and the arylacetamide
spiradoline (Dionne et al., 1991
; Peters and Gaylor, 1989
),
all have displayed a predisposition for eliciting CNS disturbances,
including altered perception, dysphoria and psychotomimetic reactions.
Enadoline and PD117302 represent a series of highly selective
arylacetamide kappa opioids originally developed as
analgesics (Halfpenny et al., 1989
; Hunter et
al., 1990
; Leighton et al., 1987
) and possessing
~900- and ~9000-fold selectively, respectively, for kappa vs.
mu or delta opioid binding sites, with negligible affinity for nonopioid sites, including PCP or sigma sites
(Clark et al., 1988
; Hunter et al., 1990
).
Furthermore, as the resolved (
)-enantiomer, the pharmacological
profile exhibited by enadoline is consistent with kappa
opioid activity (Hunter et al., 1990
). More importantly,
clinical evaluations with enadoline have yet to reveal dysphoria or
psychotomimetic activity. Specifically, although CNS effects, including
lethargy, dystaxia, emotional lability, abnormal thinking and other
perceptual effects, have been reported at high doses (Dawkins et
al., 1991
; Reece et al., 1994
), the results of tests to
assess drug-induced sedation, euphoria and psychotomimetic activity
revealed effects of minimal intensity that, when corrected for placebo,
were not considered clinically significant (Reece et al.,
1994
).
The results of several recent studies have confirmed that enadoline and
PD117302 are neuroprotective in experimental models of CNS injury
(Tortella and DeCoster, 1994
). Although these data have been obtained
almost exclusively in rodent models of ischemic injury, evidence
derived from a gyrencephalic injury model (i.e., focal
cerebral ischemia in cats) confirms a neuroprotective property of
enadoline in higher species (Mackay et al., 1993
). Its
neuroprotective mechanism of actions remains to be elucidated, but
results from in vitro and in vivo studies
indicate that enadoline acts presynaptically to inhibit the release of
glutamate (Hill and Brotchie, 1995
; Lambert et al., 1991
;
Millan et al., 1995
; Pinnock, 1992
), thereby attenuating one
of the primary excitotoxic signals responsible for neuronal injury in
the mammalian CNS. On the basis of these findings, enadoline is
currently entering clinical trials in stroke patients.
The purpose of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive pharmacological evaluation of the effects of enadoline and PD117302 on spontaneous cortical brain function in the rat. Using CASA, an EEG "fingerprint" has been identified representing kappa opioid activity that is distinct from that described previously for other psychotomimetic kappa opioid and nonopioid drugs.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals.
Fifty male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g;
Zivic-Miller) were anesthetized with ketamine HCl and xylazine (70 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg i.m., respectively) and surgically prepared with a
chronic indwelling jugular vein catheter and epidural stainless-steel screw (0-80 ×
in.) electrodes chronically implanted
and fixed to the skull using dental acrylate cement. The four recording
electrodes were implanted bilaterally over the right and left frontal
(3 mm anterior, 2 mm lateral to bregma) and parietal (3 mm posterior, 2 mm lateral to bregma) cortices. A fifth reference electrode was
implanted over the occipital cortex (Tortella et al., 1987
).
Ten rats were also prepared with an 27-gauge indwelling cannulae aimed
at the right lateral ventricle for intracerebroventricular injections.
After surgery, all animals were allowed 3 to 5 days for recovery before
testing. During this time, they were acclimated to the test environment
by being individually housed in clear Plexiglas recording chambers
(30 × 30 × 49 cm). A 12 hr light/dark cycle (lights on at
6:00 a.m.) was maintained, and food and water were provided ad
libitum.
EEG analysis.
The recording chambers described above were
equipped with custom designed multichannel mercury swivel commutators
(Dragonfly Inc., Silver Spring, MD). The rats were connected to the
swivel system by flexible Microdot cables. This recording set-up
provided a noise-free connection from the unrestrained rat to a Grass
model 7D polygraph, permitting freedom of movement by the animals
during all phases of the experiment. In addition to the on-line EEG
record, the experiments were simultaneously recorded on a
Hewlett-Packard FM tape recorder and time-coded (see Tortella et
al., 1987
, for details). The direct bipolar EEG was filtered at
the polygraph at 35 Hz (high pass) and analyzed on-line and off-line by
spectral analysis on a Nicolet Pathfinder II signal analysis system
(Nicolet Instrument Co., Madison, WI) using the FAP (frequency analysis program) developed by Nicolet and the Pathlab II software package developed by R. P. Gussio (see Marquis et al., 1989
).
On-line, predrug and postdrug EEG epochs of 1-min duration were
analyzed continuously during the entire experiment by digitizing six
consecutive 10-sec samples of analog EEG activity at a rate of 126 Hz
and subjected to fast Fourier transformation to provide real-time power
density spectra. Using these comprehensive power density spectra,
selected 1-min EEG epochs chosen for subsequent off-line analysis were
averaged to yield single plots of EEG spectral power shifts in the
frequency domain. EEG spectral estimates, including peak frequency,
mean frequency, total power, 97% edge frequency and the Hjorth
parameters mobility and complexity (Hjorth, 1973
), were calculated for
the 1- to 30-Hz global band (band 5) frequency range. The EEG power
(µV2) residing in specific frequency bands was expressed
as a percentage of the total power (i.e., relative power) in
the global band. This estimate of relative power was determined for the
following designated frequency bands: 1 to 4.0 Hz (band 1), 4.0 to 8.0 Hz (band 2), 8.0 to 13.0 Hz (band 3) and 13 to 30 Hz (band 4).
Importantly, the EEG data from all animals were included in the
calculations of each of the CASA parameters quantified throughout the
study, with the exception of the peak frequency data seen in figure 5. In this case, only rats eliciting a kappa EEG response (see
fig. 6) could be included because changes in EEG power would otherwise be distributed evenly across the defined frequency bands.
|
|
Experimental protocol. Throughout these experiments, all rats were drug naive and used only once. Beginning the morning of each experiment, control EEG recordings were collected such that testing was initiated only after each subject exhibited normal EEG and behavioral SWS patterns. All experiments routinely began between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. and were considered complete on the reemergence of SWS. With this protocol, each animal served as its own control.
After the onset of normal SWS rhythms and behavior, the experiment was initiated by giving an intravenous injection of the control vehicle (1 ml/kg, distilled deionized water). For the nor-BNI experiments, rats also received an intracerebroventricular control vehicle injection (7 µl). With the reemergence of EEG SWS after the control injections (usually within 10-25 min), the animals (n = 4-6/dose) were injected intravenously with either enadoline (25, 50 or 100 µg/kg), PD117302 (1.25, 2.5 or 5.0 mg/kg) or the respective (+)-enantiomers CAM569 (500 µg/kg) and PD123497 (5.0 mg/kg). Kappa opioid receptor specificity was determined using the selective kappa antagonist nor-BNI. For these experiments, nor-BNI (25 nmol) was administered 30 min before either kappa agonist, a pretreatment time demonstrated previously to provide in vivo kappa receptor antagonism (Tortella et al., 1989Compounds.
Enadoline [(5R)-5
, 7
,
8
)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxzspiro [4,5]
dec-8-yl]-4-benzofuranacetamide monohydrochloride], PD117302
[(±)-trans-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]benzo[b]thiophene-4-acetamide monohydrochloride] and their respective (+)-isomers (CAM569 and PD123497) were synthesized by the Parke-Davis Research Unit (Cambridge, UK). nor-BNI was purchased from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA). All
compounds were dissolved in distilled deionized water immediately
before testing and administered as a 1 ml/kg volume. Intracerebroventricular injections of nor-BNI were delivered as a
5-µl volume followed by a 2-µl flush. Importantly, all injections (i.v. and i.c.v.) were administered as a 1-min infusion without handling or disturbance of normal animal behavior.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the morning of testing, EEG and behavioral SWS activity was
routinely observed by 9:00 a.m. for each rat. Control intravenous or
intracerebroventricular vehicle injections were followed by quiet-awake
behavior and normal desynchronized cortical EEG activity consisting of
low-amplitude waveforms, which on CASA of the EEG, failed to show any
predominate EEG spectral peak (fig. 1, top). On-line
visual monitoring of the analog EEG activity and real-time, compressed
frequency analysis of the EEG using the FAP program revealed little
change in the amplitude of the waveform after either enadoline or
PD117302 injections. Furthermore, although the EEG waveforms clearly
appeared more synchronized after enadoline and PD117302 injections,
inspection of the cortical EEG activity showed little evidence of the
classic opioid-like EEG SWBs and no signs of EEG (or behavioral)
seizures (fig. 1). As demonstrated by the representative power spectra
generated for enadoline (fig. 1, left) or PD117302 (fig. 1,
right)-induced EEG activity, with increasing doses both
kappa opioids produced a marked consolidation of EEG power
centered about the 5.0-Hz frequency band.
|
As shown in figure 2, changes in total EEG power (band
5) measured for enadoline and PD117302 were not dose dependent and revealed only moderate increases measured at the 50 µg/kg and 5 mg/kg
doses, respectively. In contrast, figure 3 shows that analysis of relative power shifts across the defined frequency bands
demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in EEG power measured in band 1, which was associated with concomitant increases in EEG power measured
in band 2. The dose-dependent EEG power shifts between bands 1 and 2 are further distinguished in figure 4, in which with
increasing doses, a maximal 25% to 30% shift in power from band 1 to
band 2 was measured (fig. 4). Quantitatively, there were no changes in
the EEG power distributions measured for the higher (i.e.,
or
) frequency bands (fig. 3, bands 3 and 4).
|
|
|
Additional CASA of the enadoline and PD117302 EEG response identified the peak frequency of their respective EEG waveforms as 5.0 ± 0.2 and 4.8 ± 0.2 Hz (fig. 5, top). In addition, compared with predrug activity, enadoline and PD117302 significantly decreased the mean frequency of the EEG by ~0.4 Hz (fig. 5, bottom). Finally, significant postdrug decreases in the edge frequency, mobility and complexity of the EEG were measured for both drugs (table 1).
|
The percentage of rats per treatment group responding to doses of
enadoline or PD117302 by producing the kappa EEG profile is
shown in figure 6. Quantal analysis of these data
(Tallarida and Murray, 1987
) demonstrated that the respective
ED50 values (and confidence limits) for enadoline and
PD117302 are 18 (6.8-49.7) µg/kg and 1,690 (1200-2466) µg/kg,
indicating that enadoline is 94-fold more potent than PD117302.
The immediate behavioral response to acute injections of enadoline or PD117302 was sedation. However, the animals were awake, upright and responsive to external stimuli. Also, in most animals, an immediate brief Straub tail reaction lasting 15 to 30 sec was observed. After the period of sedation, both kappa opioids produced intermittent, brief episodes of sniffing and locomotion. At the highest dose tested, the duration of enadoline- and PD117302-induced behavior and associated kappa EEG changes was 26 ± 3 and 25 ± 4 min, respectively. Regardless of dose, neither drug produced behavioral signs of ataxia or head-weaving.
Figure 7 describes the dose-dependent effect of
enadoline or PD117302 to delay the onset to SWS. Control SWS latencies
for the rats tested across all treatment groups ranged from 3.5 ± 1.1 to 15.2 ± 5.3 min. At the highest doses tested, enadoline and
PD117302 increased the latency to SWS a maximum of 62 ± 2 and
46 ± 5 min, respectively (fig. 7).
|
Control intracerebroventricular injections of nor-BNI failed to produce any significant changes in the EEG or behavior of the rat (not shown). However, pretreatment with the kappa antagonist significantly attenuated the EEG and behavioral effects of enadoline or PD117302 (figs. 3, 4, 6 and 7). Furthermore, the (+)-enantiomers of enadoline (CAM569) or PD117302 (PD123497) had no effect on the EEG or behavior of the rat (figs. 6 and 7).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kappa opioids represents a chemically diverse, pharmacologically complex class of drugs possessing a spectrum of opioid and nonopioid receptor affinities and an array of pharmacological properties. Originally developed as analgesics, kappa opioids historically have been limited by side effects ranging from diuresis and acute dysphoric reactions to psychotomimesis and dependence. However, with the successful development of highly selective ligands for the kappa opioid binding site, there is increasing evidence to suggest that a clinically useful kappa drug can be developed without severe limiting side effects.
As research in the field has advanced from the benzomorphinan ligands
to the arylacetamide series of kappa opioids, several drugs
prototyped after the selective kappa opioid U-50488 have been developed as kappa agonists possessing analgesic
activity in a number of preclinical models of nociception. Most notable have been the Upjohn compound spiradoline (U62066) and the Parke-Davis drug PD117302, both representing racemic mixtures of two enantiomers (Rees, 1992
). As racemates, each drug displayed preclinical efficacy as
analgesics. However, their (+)-isomers were determined to exhibit affinity at mu opioid binding sites (Meecham et
al., 1989
) and, at least in the case of spiradoline [140-fold
mu selectivity for its (+)-isomer], subsequently determined
to possess dysphoric properties in humans (Dione et al.,
1991; Peters and Gaylor, 1989
). In contrast, the furanyl derivative of
PD117302, enadoline, was developed by Parke Davis as the resolved
(
)-enantiomer and demonstrated to be highly selective for the
kappa opioid receptor (Ki = 0.11 nM;
µ/kappa selectivity ratio of 905) and exhibit a
pharmacological profile in rodents typical of kappa ligands
(Hunter et al., 1990
). Thus, unlike its predecessors,
enadoline is a potent analgesic (Davis et al., 1992
; Hunter
et al., 1990
; McLaughlin et al., 1995
) and
neuroprotective (Tortella and DeCoster, 1994
) drug that on early
clinical evaluation appears to be devoid of psychotomimetic activity
(Dawkins et al., 1991
; Reece et al., 1994
).
The results of the present study identified and characterized EEG properties of enadoline and PD117302 in conscious rats that were stereoselective and antagonized by nor-BNI. The emergence of the kappa opioid EEG spectral changes was dose dependent such that with increasing doses of either enadoline or PD117302, a synchronization of cortical activity emerged despite minimal, nonsignificant changes measured in total EEG power. For either drug, CASA of the power spectral shifts analyzed in the frequency domain revealed a consolidation of EEG power centered around the 4.8- to 5.0-Hz frequency band and an overall mean frequency of 6.2 Hz. Therefore, using this highly quantitative approach, a distinct "EEG fingerprint" can be attributed to kappa opioid receptor activation, at least in rats.
Although a similar kappa opioid-induced EEG peak frequency
has been described for other kappa ligands, certain
qualitative and quantitative differences can be seen that are likely
related to differences in kappa binding site affinity and
selectivity profiles. For example, previous EEG studies in rats
examining less-selective kappa ligands, such as cyclazocine,
ethylketocyclazocine and ketocyclazocine, U-50,488, or spiradoline and
BRL52656, have demonstrated either significant increases or decreases
in total EEG power or amplitude (Campi and Clarke 1995
; Carruyo
et al., 1968
; Colasanti and Khazan, 1973
; Tortella et
al., 1980
; Young et al., 1993
; Young and Khazan, 1984
);
the induction of high-amplitude SWB in awake EEG (Campi and Clarke,
1995
; Colasanti and Khazan, 1973
; Tortella et al., 1980
;
Young and Khazan, 1984
) or, in the case of spiradoline, a "dual
peak" power spectra profile (Campi and Clarke, 1995
; Tortella
et al., 1990
). These putative kappa-induced EEG
effects are, for the most part, inconsistent with those described in
the present study for either enadoline or PD117302 and likely attributed to the differences reported in the opioid binding affinities and selectivities for these drugs. Therefore, it is plausible that the
different EEG profiles reported for the less-selective kappa
ligands involve differential interactions at mu, kappa, and
possibly even sigma or dopaminergic binding sites (Tortella et al., 1980
; Young et al., 1989
, 1993
).
In addition to receptor heterogeneity, differences in the EEG analysis
procedures may account in part for the differences in EEG activity
described in this study for enadoline and PD117302 vs., for
example, that reported elsewhere for enadoline or spiradoline (Campi
and Clarke, 1995
) and other kappa opioids such as U50,488 and ketocyclazocine (Young et al., 1993
; Young and Khazan,
1984
). In these latter studies, EEG CASA was usually preformed
posthoc (i.e., off-line) and/or only at
designated postdrug injection intervals (usually 15-30 min).
Therefore, in the final analysis, this CASA protocol may not capture
the dynamic changes in the EEG occurring immediately and possibly
intermittently. This was not the case in our experiments because EEG
CASA was performed continuously on-line (i.e., using the
FAP) from predrug injection until the reemergence of postdrug SWS. As
such, the computer-derived EEG fingerprints described here for
enadoline and PD117302 represents the predominant EEG effect caused by
these drugs as measured in real time rather than the measured effect of
the drug response at a designated postinjection time interval, which
may be different. Importantly, using our approach, the "dual peak"
power spectra profile for spiradoline and its resolved isomers has been
identified to be qualitatively and quantitatively distinct from that
for enadoline or its (+)-isomer CAM569 (Tortella et al.,
1990
).
To date, all kappa opioids (with the exception of
enadoline) entering into clinical trials have produced unwanted
psychotomimetic/hallucinogenic episodes in patients (vidae
infra). The identification and prediction of drug-induced
psychotomimetic activity based on preclinical experimental studies in a
subhuman species have been difficult (if not impossible), with most
efforts having focused on animal behavior studies that, by their
nature, represent the highest level of integrative CNS activity. How
the EEG findings described in the present study relate to this issue of
drug-induced psychotomimesis in experimental animals remains to be
determined. In contrast to a study of solely animal behavior, the
present study measured brain function directly by recording the
electrical field potentials in the rat cortical EEG. Although this end
point offers a lower level of CNS integration, it has been shown to
provide some insight toward identifying and understanding drug-induced
CNS disturbances in rodents. For example, using rat EEG and CASA,
Dimpfel et al. (1989)
reported an ability to distinguish
hallucinogenic from nonhallucinogenic amphetamine derivatives.
Moreover, their results demonstrated that hallucinogenic compounds
selectively increased EEG power in the
1 frequency range
(7.0-9.5 Hz). Earlier studies by this same group (Dimpfel et
al., 1988
) showed a similar pattern of changes for LSD. More
recently, a number of putative psychotomimetic drugs have been studied
using a rat model of spontaneous cortical EEG activity and CASA similar
to that described in the present study. Injections of phencyclidine
have been shown to induce a dual peak spectra (Mattia and Moreton,
1986
), not unlike that reported for the psychotomimetic NMDA antagonist
MK-801 (Marquis et al., 1989
; Tortella and Hill, 1996
), the
benzomorphan phencyclidine/sigma ligands (+)-SKF-10047 and
(+)-cyclazocine (Marquis et al., 1989
; Tortella and Robles,
1991
) or the psychotomimetic kappa opioid spiradoline (Campi
and Clarke, 1995
; Tortella et al., 1990
). For example, as
mentioned earlier, studies evaluating the EEG effects of spiradoline in
rats (Tortella et al., 1990
) determined that this somewhat
selective kappa opioid induces an EEG spectral profile similar to other putative psychotomimetic drugs (i.e., a
dual peak spectra profile with frequency peaks centered around 1.9 and
5.0 Hz). Furthermore, it was determined that the initial spectral peak
produced by spiradoline was selective for the (+)-enantiomer U63639 and
antagonized by a low dose of naloxone (probably mu), whereas
the second kappa-like peak was selective for the
(
)-enantiomer U63640. Campi and Clarke (1995)
also described a double
peak EEG power spectra for analgesic doses of spiradoline in rats that was not seen at equivalent antinociceptive doses of enadoline. Critically, in the present study, CASA of the rat cortical EEG activity
after injections of enadoline or PD117302 failed to reveal either
changes in
1 power or the dual peak EEG spectral
profile, apparently associated with certain psychoactive drugs.
The novel EEG fingerprint produced by enadoline and described in the
present study was stereoselective for the (
)-isomer and, like
PD117302, was antagonized by pretreatment with the selective kappa antagonist nor-BNI. This suggests that these unique
EEG changes represent a true functional activation of the
kappa opioid receptor. These results are consistent with
previous reports describing different EEG effects of
non-kappa opioids in rats or kappa opioids possessing mixed selectivity for mu, delta and
kappa opioid receptors (vidae infra). For
example, using similar CASA EEG techniques, Khazan and coworkers
(Khazan, 1975
; Young et al., 1981
) and Tortella et
al., (1987)
have shown that mu opioids such as morphine
and [D-Ala2-N-methly-Phe4-Gly5-ol]enkephalin
produce predominantly an EEG slowing characterized by high amplitude
bursts at low doses characterized by an increase in power in the 0- to
10-Hz frequency band and continuous synchronization and seizures at
high doses. The mu-mediated EEG slowing is quantitatively measured as a distinct broad, single peak frequency spectra compared with the more-consolidated power spectra of enadoline of PD117302. These mu-mediated EEG effects have been shown to be highly
sensitive to antagonisms by naloxone or
[D-Pen2-D-Pen5]enkephalin
-funaltrexamine (Khazan, 1975
; Tortella et al., 1987
). In
contrast, delta opioid ligands such as
[D-Pen2-L-Pen5]enkephalin and
DPLPE, deltorphin or SNC-80 also produce a consolidated single peak
power spectra in the rat EEG but of a higher peak frequency (at
5.5-6.5 Hz) compared with enadoline and are antagonized by the
delta opioid antagonists ICI 174,864, naltrindole or
naltriben (Tortella et al., 1987
). Depending
on their route of administration, mu and delta
opioids can also induce EEG seizures in rats (Tortella, 1993
), another
effect apparently not shared by enadoline or PD117302 (present study)
or other highly selective kappa opioids (Campi and Clarke,
1995
; Tortella et al., 1990
; Young et al., 1989
). Finally, although enadoline and PD117302 induced a brief Straub tail
reaction, a behavioral response considered synonymous with a
mu receptor activation, we observed similar Straub tail
behaviors in rats after the intravenous injection of several nonopioid
drugs, including sodium channel blockers, glycine antagonists,
metrazol, some sigma compounds and even the excitatory amino
acid N-methyl-D-aspartate. Importantly, in the present
study, the Straub tail induced by enadoline or PD117302 was antagonized
by nor-BNI.
In conclusion, the neuroprotective kappa opioids enadoline and PD117302 were determined to induce changes in spontaneous cortical EEG activity in unanesthetized rats that were (1) kappa opioid receptor specific, (2) distinct from EEG effects described for non-kappa opioids or kappa opioids possessing mixed receptor binding affinities and (3) unlike those described in rats for known hallucinogenic or psychotomimetic drugs. Although high doses of enadoline may produce clinical signs of lethargy, dystaxia, emotional lability, abnormal thinking and other perceptual effects, drug-induced sedation, euphoria and psychotomimetic activity do not appear to be of clinical significance (vide infra). Therefore, it is possible that this kappa drug, which is entering into clinical trials for the treatment of stroke and ischemic brain attacks, may not be burdened with the unwanted CNS side effects associated with earlier kappa opioid drugs. Finally, the results of this study suggest that the method of EEG CASA in rats provides a sensitive and highly quantifiable in vivo approach for the characterization and study of kappa opioid activity and may be a predictor of preclinical drug-induced psychotomimesis and/or related CNS disturbances.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication March 18, 1997.
Received for publication October 8, 1996.
1 Research was conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH publication 85-23. The views of the authors do not purport to reflect the position of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense, (para 4-3), AR 360-5.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Frank C. Tortella, Department of Neuropharmacology and Molecular Biology, Division of Neurosciences, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
EEG, electroencephalogram; CASA, computer-assisted spectral analysis; SWB, slow-wave burst; SWS, slow-wave sleep; nor-BNI, norbinaltorphimine; FAP, frequency analysis program; CNS, central nervous system.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) enantiomers of spiradoline and PD117302.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
173: 151-157, 1989[Medline].
receptor antagonists: EEG, EEG power spectral and behavioral correlates.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
231: 473-476, 1993[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C S. Bradford, E. A Walthers, B. T Searcy, and F. L Moore Cloning, heterologous expression and pharmacological characterization of a kappa opioid receptor from the brain of the rough-skinned newt, Taricha granulosa J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 34(3): 809 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Williams, F. C. Tortella, X. M. Lu, J. E. Moreton, and J. A. Hartings Antiepileptic Drug Treatment of Nonconvulsive Seizures Induced by Experimental Focal Brain Ischemia J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 220 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Williams, X. M. Lu, B. Slusher, and F. C. Tortella Electroencephalogram Analysis and Neuroprotective Profile of the N-Acetylated-alpha -Linked Acidic Dipeptidase Inhibitor, GPI5232, in Normal and Brain-Injured Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2001; 299(1): 48 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Williams, J. R. Dave, J. B. Phillips, Y. Lin, R. T. McCabe, and F. C. Tortella Neuroprotective Efficacy and Therapeutic Window of the High-Affinity N-Methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist Conantokin-G: In Vitro (Primary Cerebellar Neurons) and In Vivo (Rat Model of Transient Focal Brain Ischemia) Studies J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2000; 294(1): 378 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Tortella, P. Britton, A. Williams, X. C. M. Lu, and A. H. Newman Neuroprotection (Focal Ischemia) and Neurotoxicity (Electroencephalographic) Studies in Rats with AHN649, a 3-Amino Analog of Dextromethorphan and Low-Affinity N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Antagonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1999; 291(1): 399 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||