![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 2, 868-875, 1997
Novo Nordisk A/S, Health Care Discovery, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760, Måløv, Denmark (M.J.S., M.D.B.S., P.D.S., P.H.O., P.S.) and Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (H.E.S., F.P.B., C.H.M., J.S.W.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The analgesic effects of a series of muscarinic agonists were investigated by use of the mouse acetic acid writhing, grid-shock, hot-plate and tail-flick tests. The compounds tested were oxotremorine, pilocarpine, arecoline, aceclidine, RS86 and four 3-3(substituted-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl pyridines (substituted TZTP), these being propoxy-TZTP, 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP, xanomeline (hexyloxy-TZTP) and hexylthio-TZTP. These agonists were also assayed for their ability to displace [3H]oxotremorine-M and [3H]pirenzepine binding and for their functional selectivity at pharmacologic M1, M2 and M3 receptors. These compounds all produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in all of the mouse analgesia tests. The effects of oxotremorine in the writhing test were fully antagonized by the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (0.1 mg/kg), but only partially antagonized by methscopolamine (10 mg/kg) and unaffected by the opioid antagonist naltrexone. 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP and propoxy-TZTP had virtually no effect at the M1 receptor subtype as measured by the human m1 clone expressed in baby hamster kidney cells or the rabbit vas deferens assay. These compounds, however, were more potent in the analgesia tests than the selective M1 agonists xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP. These data suggest that muscarinic analgesia is mediated by central muscarinic receptors. However, activity at the M1 receptor subtype is not a requirement for antinociceptive activity.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been known for more than
50 years that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as physostigmine
have analgesic properties in man (see review by Hartvig et
al., 1989
; Petersson et al., 1986
). The analgesic
properties of these compounds lead to the suggestion that cholinergic
mechanisms are involved in pain and analgesia.
Several studies have demonstrated that muscarinic cholinergic agonists
as well as cholinesterase inhibitors are active in animal tests for
analgesic activity (Chen, 1958
; Herz, 1962
; Metys et al.,
1969
; Harris et al., 1969
; Ireson, 1970
). Harris et
al. (1969)
showed that the nonselective muscarinic agonist
oxotremorine and the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine were as
efficacious as morphine in the mouse tail flick, but were 250 and 35 times more potent. Furthermore, acetylcholine administered
intracerebroventricularly produced analgesia in the mouse tail-flick
test (Pedigo et al., 1975
). These analgesic effects were
antagonized by muscarinic antagonists but not by opioid antagonists
(Pedigo et al., 1975
). These findings demonstrated that
muscarinic analgesia is mediated directly through muscarinic receptors
and not indirectly through opioid systems. In addition, chronic
oxotremorine and physostigmine infusions have been shown not to produce
physical dependence (Widman et al., 1985
).
Although the accumulated data suggest that muscarinic agonists may be a
viable alternative to opioid analgesics, the prominent parasympathomimetic cholinergic side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, diarrhea, urination, salivation and lacrimation preclude their clinical utility. The recent discovery of subtypes of muscarinic receptors (Bonner et al., 1987
), however, has provoked
interest in the discovery of analgesic muscarinic agonists which are
devoid of the unwanted effects of compounds such as oxotremorine.
Several studies have tried to investigate the muscarinic receptor
subtypes involved in the antinociception evoked by muscarinic agonists.
Ghelardini et al. (1990)
suggested that M1
receptors were involved, whereas Dawson et al. (1991)
suggested that antinociception in the mouse tail flick was mediated by
M1 or M3 receptors. More recently, Iwamoto and
Marion (1993)
, working with intrathecally injected muscarinic agonists,
suggested that M1 and/or M2 receptor subtypes
were involved.
In the present study we report on the antinociceptive effects of a
range of cholinergic muscarinic agonists and show that these effects
are mediated by central muscarinic receptors. Furthermore, we report on
the antinociceptive effects of a range of new cholinergic agonists,
substituted TZTPs, with varying functional subtype selectivity. We have
investigated the selectivity of these compounds in cloned human
m1 receptors, the rabbit vas deferens (M1;
Shannon et al., 1993
) and the isolated guinea pig atria
(M2; Clague et al., 1985
). Although the guinea
pig ileum contains 70% M2 and 30% M3
receptors (Ford et al., 1991
), contraction of this tissue
has been shown to be mediated by M3 receptors (Michel and
Whiting, 1988
; Ford et al., 1991
; Eglen and Harris, 1993
;
Honda et al., 1993
; Doods et al., 1994
).
Therefore, we have used the guinea pig ileum to investigate activity of
the compounds at M3 receptors. The data obtained with these
compounds suggest that the antinociceptive effects of muscarinic
compounds may not reside solely in their effects at the M1
subtype. Preliminary portions of these data have been partially
published in abstract form (Swedberg et al., 1993
).
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Receptor Binding Studies
The method used has been fully described by Sauerberg et
al. (1991)
. Fresh cortex from male Wistar rats was homogenized for 5 to 10 sec in 10 ml of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). The suspension was centrifuged for 15 min at 4000 × g. The pellet was
washed three times with buffer and centrifuged. The final pellet was
homogenized in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4; 100 ml/g of tissue) and used for
binding. For [3H]oxotremorine-M binding, 25 µl of test
solution and 25 µl of [3H]oxotremorine-M (1.0 nM final
concentration) were added to 0.5 ml of homogenate, and the solution was
mixed and incubated for 30 min at 25°C. Nonspecific binding was
determined in triplicate with arecoline (3 µM). For
[3H]pirenzepine binding, the homogenate was added to
[3H]pirenzepine (1 nM) and nonspecific binding was
determined with atropine (1 µM). After incubation, samples were
filtered through a Whatman glass fiber filter with ice-cold buffer, and
the filter was washed with ice-cold buffer. Radioactivity of the
filters was determined by scintillation counting. IC50
values were calculated from inhibitory effects of at least four
concentrations of test compound, in triplicate, by use of the Hill
equation.
In Vitro Functional Pharmacological Studies
Inositol phosphate hydrolysis in BHK cells transfected with human
m1 muscarinic receptors.
BHK cells
transfected with human m1 muscarinic receptors were placed
onto 24-well culture dishes at about 100,000 cells per well. After
24 h, the cells were labeled with 2 µCi
myo-[2-3H]inositol (Amersham, Inc., Arlington
Heights, IL; 16.3 Ci/mmol TRK911) per well. After 24 h of
incubation the cells were rinsed with 10 mM LiCl in DMEM-HEPES buffer,
then incubated in this buffer for 30 min at 37°C. The indicated drug,
or buffer, was then added, and the cells were incubated for an
additional 30 min. The reaction was stopped by aspirating off the
buffer and adding 1.0 ml of DMEM-HEPES and 1.0 ml of ice-cold
perchloric acid. The plates were kept on ice for 10 min. The solution
from each well was then centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 min. Four hundred microliters of the supernatant from each sample was
transferred to a separate tube containing 100 µl of 10 mM
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (pH 7.0). The samples were neutralized
by adding 300 µl of a 1:1 mixture of freon and
tri-n-octylamine by the method of Sharpes and McCarl (1982)
.
Four hundred microliters of the resulting supernatant was diluted with
4 ml of water and applied to an Amprep minicolumn (Amersham, Inc.; RPN
1908). Inositol monophosphates, inositol biphosphates and inositol
tetrabisphosphates were then eluted off the column.
Rabbit vas deferens.
Vasa deferentia were isolated from New
Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.5 to 4.0 kg (Hazelton Research
Products, Denver, PA) which had been sacrificed by i.v. overdose with
sodium pentobarbitone and prepared according to Shannon et
al. (1993)
. Each vas deferens was dissected free from surrounding
tissue, divided into a prostatic and an epididymal segment and placed
into modified Krebs' solution of the following composition (mM): NaCl,
134; KCl, 3.4; CaCl2, 2.8; KH2PO4,
1.3; NaHCO3, 16; MgSO4, 0.6; and glucose, 7.7. Yohimbine (1.0 µM) was included to block alpha-2
adrenergic receptors. The pH of the Krebs' solution was maintained at
7.4 during all experiments by constant bubbling with 95%
O2/5% CO2. Each segment was suspended between
two platinum/iridium electrodes in a 10-ml organ bath maintained at
31°C and attached to a Grass FT.03 force transducer. A passive force
of 0.75 g was applied followed by an equilibration time of 45 min
before continuous stimulation with square wave pulses at 0.05 Hz, 40 to
50 V, 0.5-msec duration. An equal number of prostatic and epididymal
segments were used for each treatment. Changes in isometric tension
were recorded and analyzed with an M5000 Signal Processing Center with
XYZ real-time software (Modular Instruments, Inc., Malvern, PA) and a
Compaq Deskpro 386 computer (Compaq Computer Corporation, Houston, TX).
Guinea pig atria. Male Hartley guinea pigs (Møllegård, Ry, Denmark) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The hearts were quickly removed and the atria dissected free from the surrounding tissue. The atria were suspended in 10-ml organ baths and bathed in modified Krebs-Henseleit solution of the following composition (mM): NaCl, 118; NaHCO3, 25; KCl, 4.7; CaCl2, 2.5; MgCl2, 2.1; NaH2PO4, 1.03; and glucose, 11. The solution was continuously bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. The mechanical activity of the tissue was measured by a Hugo Sachs Electronics (March-Hugstetten, Germany) type 351 isometric force transducer connected via a HSE type 301 bridge amplifier to a Kontron type 340 potentiometric pen recorder.
The negative inotropic effect of compounds was determined by a sequential dosing regimen with a dosing interval of 30 sec. Responses were expressed as percentage reduction of the force of contraction during a 5-min control period before the application of the test compound. IC50 values were determined by standard linear regression techniquesGuinea pig ileum. Ilea were isolated from male Hartley guinea pigs (Møllegård, Ry, Denmark) that were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, the terminal 15 cm of ileum removed, and 1.5- to 2.0-cm lengths prepared and mounted in 10-ml organ baths containing Tyrode solutions of the following composition (mM): NaCl, 137; KCl, 2.68; CaCl2, 0.9; MgCl2, 1.05; NaHCO3, 11.9; NaHPO4, 0.42; and glucose, 5.55. The solution was continuously bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Resting tension was set at 1 g and the tissue left to equilibrate for 1 hr. The mechanical activity of the tissue was measured by a Hugo Sachs Electronics (March-Hugstetten, Germany) type 351 isometric force transducer connected via a HSE type 301 bridge amplifier to a Kontron type 340 potentiometric pen recorder.
The contractile effect of compounds was investigated by a sequential dosing regimen with a 30-sec contact time for the compound and a 3-min dosing interval. The force of contraction in grams was measured 30 sec after addition of compound. EC50 values were calculated using standard linear regression techniques.Analgesic Studies
Acetic acid-induced writhing. Separate groups of 5 to 10 mice (Crl:CF1®BR, Charles River, Portage, MI) each were administered vehicle or a dose of the test compound (s.c.), followed 25 min later by an intraperitoneal injection of 0.5% acetic acid. Each mouse was then placed in an individual clear plastic observational chamber and the total number of writhes made by each mouse was counted between 5 and 10 min after acetic acid administration (30-35 min after vehicle or test compound). Data are expressed as the mean number of writhes during the 5 min observation period. ED50 values were determined by standard linear regression techniques.
Grid-shock.
This part of the study was carried out according
to the method of Swedberg (1994)
. Groups of 10 mice (male NMRI,
Møllegaard, Denmark) were placed individually in transparent acrylic
chamber (13 × 13 × 13 cm) equipped with a stainless steel
grid floor through which electric shocks could be delivered. The top of
the chamber was covered with a removable acrylic plate and had a
decibel meter (precision sound level meter, type 2232, Bruel and Kjaer,
Copenhagen, Denmark) attached. A shock generator delivering current
intensity increasing from 0.01 to 0.5 mA over a period of 30 sec was
connected to the grid floor. Square wave pulses of 2 msec duration were presented at 30 Hz. A predrug latency (sec) to vocalization (a 70-dB
squeak turned off the shocks) was generated for each mouse. A trial was
always terminated at the 70-dB squeak level or after 30 sec (cutoff
time), whichever came first. After the predrug trial, the mice were
injected with drug or vehicle subcutaneously and retested 30 min later
to produce a postdrug latency to vocalization. The pre- and postdrug
scores were summarized over the 10 mice in each group and means and
standard errors calculated. Percent analgesia was calculated by the
following formula: (postdrug latency
predrug latency/cutoff
time
predrug latency) × 100.
Hot-plate.
Groups of 10 mice (male NMRI, Møllegaard,
Denmark, 10-22 g) were placed individually on a hot plate maintained
at 55°C, and the latency to licking of the front paws was measured in
each mouse; animals not responding were removed after 30 sec (cutoff time). After this predrug trial, animals were injected with vehicle or
drug s.c. and retested 30 min later to give a postdrug latency. Each
animal was used only once. The pre- and postdrug latencies were
summarized for the 10 mice in each group and the percentage analgesia
calculated with the following formula: (Postdrug latency
predrug latency/cutoff time
predrug latency) × 100.
Tail-flick.
Groups of 10 mice (male NMRI, Møllegaard,
Denmark, 20-22 g) were taken individually and their tails immersed in
a 55°C water bath and the latency to removal measured. Thirty minutes
after s.c. injection of drug or vehicle, a postdrug latency was
obtained, a cutoff time of 10 sec was used. Each animal was used only
once. The pre- and postdrug latencies were summarized over the 10 mice in each group and the percentage analgesia calculated with the following formula: (Postdrug latency
predrug latency/cutoff time
predrug latency) × 100.
Materials
Propoxy-TZTP, 3-Cl-propoxy-TZTP, xanomeline (hexyloxy-TZTP) and
hexylthio-TZTP (see fig. 1) were synthesized according
to the method published by Sauerberg et al. (1992)
, RS86 and
aceclidine were synthesized at Lilly Research Laboratories. Carbachol,
oxotremorine sesquifumarate, arecoline hydrobromide and pilocarpine
hydrochloride (±) were purchased from Research Biochemicals
International, Natick, MA.
|
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vitro receptor binding. The IC50 values for the muscarinic agonists and the thiadiazole tetrahydropyridine analogs of arecoline propoxy-TZTP, 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP, xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP for inhibiting [3H]oxotremorine-M and [3H]pirenzepine are shown in table 2. All of the compounds, including the substituted TZTPs, showed high affinity in both [3H]oxotremorine-M and [3H]pirenzepine binding.
|
Antinociceptive effects of muscarinic agonists.
The muscarinic
agonist oxotremorine produced dose-related antinociceptive effects in
each of the analgesia tests (figs.
2, 3, 4, 5 and
table 1). The ED50 values for oxotremorine
varied from 0.04 to 0.15 mg/kg across the tests. In addition, the
muscarinic agonists arecoline, pilocarpine, aceclidine and RS86
produced antinociceptive effects in each of the analgesia tests (figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and table 1). In general, the order of potencies was RS86 > pilocarpine = aceclidine > arecoline. In addition, the arecoline analogs propoxy-TZTP, 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP, xanomeline and
hexylthio-TZTP also produced antinociceptive effects in each of the
analgesia tests. In general, the order of potencies was propoxy-TZTP
3-Cl-propoxy-TZTP > xanomeline
hexylthio-TZTP (table 1). For purposes of comparison, the opioids
morphine and pethidine were also tested. In all tests, morphine was
more potent than pethidine (table 1).
|
|
|
|
|
Stereospecificity.
The stereospecificity of the
antinociceptive effects of muscarinic agonists was evaluated by testing
the isomers of aceclidine in the writhing test. As may be seen in
figure 6, the antinociceptive effects of aceclidine in
writhing were stereospecific: S-aceclidine (ED50 = 2.5 mg/kg) was approximately twice as potent as racemic aceclidine
(5.3 mg/kg), whereas R-aceclidine was inactive up to a dose
of 30 mg/kg.
|
Antagonism by scopolamine but not methscopolamine.
To
determine if the antinociceptive effects of muscarinic agonists were
mediated directly by muscarinic receptors, the antinociceptive effects
of oxotremorine were determined alone and in the presence of graded
doses of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (fig. 7).
Scopolamine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) produced dose-related shifts to the right
in the dose-response curve of oxotremorine. Scopolamine administered
alone did not inhibit writhing (fig. 7).
|
|
Lack of antagonism by naltrexone. To determine if the effects of muscarinic agonists were mediated directly by muscarinic receptors rather than indirectly by release of endogenous enkephalins, the effects of oxotremorine (0.1 mg/kg) were determined alone and in the presence of the selective opioid antagonist naltrexone. Oxotremorine (0.1 mg/kg) administered alone inhibited acetic acid-induced writhing. Naltrexone (0.1-10 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the antinociceptive effects of oxotremorine (data not shown). Administered alone, naltrexone did not inhibit writhing (data not shown).
Inositol phosphate hydrolysis in BHK cells cloned with the human m1 muscarinic receptor. The results are shown in table 2. Propoxy- and 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP produced only 25 and 5%, respectively, of the maximal increase in phosphoinositide hydrolysis obtainable with carbachol, whereas xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP gave near-maximal responses with IC50 values of 89 and 76 µM, respectively. The data for oxotremorine, arecoline, aceclidine, pilocarpine and RS86 are shown in table 2.
Rabbit vas deferens.
Neither propoxy-TZTP nor
3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP produced greater than a 25% inhibition of twitch
height in the rabbit vas deferens at concentrations up to 30,000 nM
(table 2). In contrast, xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP both inhibited
twitch height by greater than 90% with IC50 values of
0.006 and 0.001 nM, respectively (table 2). The IC50 values
and percent maximal inhibition for the muscarinic agonists
oxotremorine, arecoline, pilocarpine, aceclidine and RS86 are
re-presented from Shannon et al. (1993)
in table 2 for purposes of comparison.
Guinea pig atria. In spontaneously beating isolated guinea pig atria, propoxy- and 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP produced concentration-dependent negative inotropic effects in guinea pig atria (table 2). Both compounds were full agonists with IC50 values of 90 and 2000 nM, respectively. Xanomeline was a weak partial agonist with an IC50 value of 9700 nM and a maximum inhibition of force of contraction of 56%. Hexylthio-TZTP only produced a maximal inhibition of 20%. The data for oxotremorine, arecoline, pilocarpine, aceclidine and RS86 are shown in table 2 for purposes of comparison.
Guinea pig ileum. Only propoxy-TZTP (EC50 = 75 nM) produced a response of 100% that of carbachol in the guinea pig whole ileum (table 2). Xanomeline (EC50 = 65 nM) produced a response 65% that of carbachol (table 2). 3-Cl-propylthio and hexylthio-TZTP produced responses only 27 and 10%, respectively, that of carbachol (table 2). The data for oxotremorine, arecoline, pilocarpine, aceclidine and RS86 are shown in table 2 for purposes of comparison.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present studies show that a wide range of cholinergic
muscarinic agonists are potent and efficacious analgesics in mice. These data extend previous studies in the literature which show similar
effects with muscarinic agonists (e.g., Ireson, 1970
; Harris
et al., 1969
; Pedigo et al., 1975
). Furthermore,
we have shown that these antinociceptive effects meet the criteria for classification as a specific, receptor-mediated effect. Muscarinic agonists from several different chemical classes were tested, and each
agonist produced dose-related antinociceptive effects in each of the
different analgesia assays. Stereospecificity was required for
producing antinociception: S-aceclidine was approximately twice as potent as racemic aceclidine, whereas R-aceclidine
was inactive up to a dose more than 10-fold greater than the
ED50 for S-aceclidine. Further, the
antinociceptive effects of oxotremorine were antagonized in an
apparently competitive manner by the specific muscarinic antagonist
scopolamine. In addition, methscopolamine, the quaternary analog of
scopolamine which crosses the blood-brain barrier only poorly, was at
least 100 times less potent than scopolamine in antagonizing the
effects of oxotremorine. These latter data indicate that the muscarinic
receptors mediating antinociception are within the central nervous
system.
Opioids are well known to affect cholinergic systems in the brain and
peripheral tissues and there has been considerable interest in the
potential role of acetylcholine in the analgesic mechanisms of opioids
(e.g., Harris et al., 1969
). Muscarinic agonists
potentiate the analgesic effects of full opioid agonists in humans
(Stone et al., 1961
) and animals (Ireson, 1970
), and those
of partial agonists or mixed agonist-antagonists, such as pentazocine
(Harris et al., 1969
). However, in the present study,
naltrexone failed to antagonize the antinociceptive effects of
oxotremorine in the writhing assay, which showed that the effects of
the muscarinic agonist are not mediated by modulation of opioid
receptors.
Until recently, it has not been possible to determine pharmacologically
which of the muscarinic receptor subtypes mediate antinociception. The
advent of functionally selective muscarinic agonists such as the
substituted TZTPs (Sauerberg et al., 1992
) has made it
possible to investigate this question. In this study we have used
xanomeline (hexyloxy-TZTP) and hexylthio-TZTP as examples of
functionally selective M1 agonists (see table 1). Both of
these compounds are effective in all four analgesia tests, thus they
are more effective in the very stringent tail-flick test than
pethidine, although their potency in the hot-plate test was relatively
low (25 and 40 mg/kg, respectively). Propoxy- and 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP
are compounds with little or no M1 receptor efficacy (see
table 1). They show very low levels of activity both in the rabbit vas
deferens, which is an M1 receptor assay (Eltze et
al., 1988
; Shannon et al., 1993
), and in the BHK cells cloned with human M1 receptors. Both compounds are potent
analgesics, approximately equivalent in potency and efficacy with
morphine, and clearly more potent and efficacious than pethidine. In
each of the mouse analgesia assays used, propoxy-TZTP and
3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP are between 2 and 20 times more potent than the
selective M1 agonists, xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP. These
data strongly suggest that muscarinic analgesia may not be mediated
primarily by the M1 receptor. This hypothesis is supported
by the finding that two very potent and efficacious muscarinic
analgesics, oxotremorine and RS86, are neither potent nor efficacious
agonists in BHK cells transfected with the cloned m1
receptor, and RS86 has very poor efficacy in the very sensitive rabbit
vas deferens assay. Furthermore, both hexylthio- and
3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP lacked efficacy in the guinea pig ileum, which is
largely an M3 receptor assay (Michel and Whiting, 1988
),
which suggests that analgesia is not mediated by the M3 receptor subtype. The lack of efficacy of the hexylthio-TZTP compound in the guinea pig atria, an M2 model (Birdsall et
al., 1989
), would further suggest that M2 receptors
may not be involved. Further data are needed, however, to more clearly
delineate which receptor subtype(s) mediate muscarinic analgesia.
The sensation and perception of pain in the mammalian central nervous
system is extremely complex, and there are many levels at which
muscarinic agonists could exert antinociceptive effects. Nociceptors
are situated on A-delta and C fibers which pass into the anterolateral
white matter in the spinal cord, enter the dorsal horns of the spinal
cord via the lateral division of the dorsal roots and
terminate in Rexed's laminae I, II, III, IV and V, where the main
projection neurons of the spinothalamic and spinocervical tracts are
situated. Clearly the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, especially the
substantia gelatinosa, would be a potential target area for
antinociceptive compounds. Furthermore, both M1 and
M2 receptors have been shown to be present in laminae II
and III (Gillberg and Askmark, 1991
). Although there is a lack of
molecular data concerning the expression of different muscarinic
receptor subtypes in the spinal cord, recent studies (Iwamoto et
al., 1992
; Iwamoto and Marion, 1993
) have shown that the
muscarinic agonist (+)cis-methyldioxolane was effective as
an antinociceptive agent after intrathecal administration to rats in
both hot-plate and tail-flick assays.
The major pathway of the projection neurons is via the
spinothalamic tract to the ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus (neospinothalamic) or to the posterior nuclear group and the
interlaminar nuclei (paleospinothalamic). The predominant muscarinic
receptor in the thalamus is the M2 receptor for which both
mRNA (Buckley et al., 1988
) and receptor protein have been found (Levey et al., 1991
). However, protein (m1
and m4) and mRNA (m1, m3,
m4 and m5) for the other subtypes also have
been found in the thalamus (Buckley et al., 1988
; Levey
et al., 1991
).
The spinothalamic tract also projects to areas in the brainstem and the
mesencephalon, which may be involved in the centrifugal control of
nociception. In these regions, again, the M2 receptor is
the predominant subtype (Buckley et al., 1988
; Levey
et al., 1991
; Levey, 1993
). The lack of efficacy of
hexylthio-TZTP in the isolated atria, however, suggests that
M2 receptor agonism may not be the mode of action of these
compounds. From the thalamus, neurons convey pain stimuli to the
cerebral cortex (mainly to the post central gyri) and the limbic
system. In these areas receptor protein and mRNA have been found for
the subtypes m1 to m4 (Buckley et
al., 1988
; Levey et al., 1991
; Levey, 1993
).
To summarize, although the primary effect does not seem to be M1 mediated, it is not possible from the available data to determine if the analgesic effects of muscarinic agonists are mediated by a specific subtype or by actions at more than one subtype at more than one site in the central nervous system, especially because the present study has only investigated the pharmacologically definable M1, M2 and M3 subtypes; thus, the importance of M4 or M5 subtypes cannot presently be investigated. The discovery of further compounds with different subtype selectivities or of subtype-selective antagonists would aid such studies.
In conclusion, a wide range of muscarinic agonists have been shown to be potent and efficacious analgesics in mice. The effects are mediated by central acetylcholinergic muscarinic receptors. The data obtained with some novel selective agonists suggest that an action at the M1 subtype alone does not mediate analgesia. Further work is required to elucidate the subtype or subtypes involved.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication January 31, 1997.
Received for publication October 31, 1995.
Send reprint requests to: Malcolm J. Sheardown, Novo Nordisk A/S, Health Care Discovery, Novo Nordisk Park, DK-2760 Måløv, Denmark.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
TZTP, (1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl pyridine;
substituted TZTPs, 3-(3-substituted-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl
pyridines;
DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium;
HEPES, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N
-2-ethanesulfonic acid;
BHK, baby
hamster kidney.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. R. Sullivan, L. Leventhal, J. Harrison, V. A. Smith, T. A. Cummons, T. B. Spangler, S.-C. Sun, P. Lu, A. J. Uveges, B. W. Strassle, et al. Pharmacological Characterization of the Muscarinic Agonist (3R,4R)-3-(3-Hexylsulfanyl-pyrazin-2-yloxy)-1-aza-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane (WAY-132983) in in Vitro and in Vivo Models of Chronic Pain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2007; 322(3): 1294 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Zhang, D.-P. Li, S.-R. Chen, and H.-L. Pan M2, M3, and M4 Receptor Subtypes Contribute to Muscarinic Potentiation of GABAergic Inputs to Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2005; 313(2): 697 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Kang and J. C. Eisenach Intrathecal Clonidine Reduces Hypersensitivity After Nerve Injury by a Mechanism Involving Spinal m4 Muscarinic Receptors Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1403 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Ma, S. Dohi, Y.-F. Wang, Y. Ishizawa, and F. Yanagidate The Antinociceptive and Sedative Effects of Carbachol and Oxycodone Administered into Brainstem Pontine Reticular Formation and Spinal Subarachnoid Space in Rats Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1307 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. U. Höglund, C. Hamilton, and L. Lindblom Effects of Microdialyzed Oxotremorine, Carbachol, Epibatidine, and Scopolamine on Intraspinal Release of Acetylcholine in the Rat J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 100 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Christiansen-Weber, J. R. Voland, Y. Wu, K. Ngo, B. L. Roland, S. Nguyen, P. A. Peterson, and W.-P. Fung-Leung Functional Loss of ABCA1 in Mice Causes Severe Placental Malformation, Aberrant Lipid Distribution, and Kidney Glomerulonephritis As Well As High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Deficiency Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 157(3): 1017 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Ellis, D. Harman, J. Gonzalez, M. L. Spera, R. Liu, T. Y. Shen, D. M. Wypij, and F. Zuo Development of Muscarinic Analgesics Derived from Epibatidine: Role of the M4 Receptor Subtype J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1999; 288(3): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. B. Swedberg, M. J. Sheardown, P. Sauerberg, P. H. Olesen, P. D. Suzdak, K. T. Hansen, F. P. Bymaster, J. S. Ward, C. H. Mitch, D. O. Calligaro, et al. Butylthio[2.2.2] (NNC 11-1053/LY297802): An Orally Active Muscarinic Agonist Analgesic J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1997; 281(2): 876 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. Shannon, M. J. Sheardown, F. P. Bymaster, D. O. Calligaro, N. W. Delapp, J. Gidda, C. H. Mitch, B. D. Sawyer, P. W. Stengel, J. S. Ward, et al. Pharmacology of Butylthio[2.2.2] (LY297802/NNC11-1053): A Novel Analgesic with Mixed Muscarinic Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Activity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1997; 281(2): 884 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||