![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 1, 149-154, 1997
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proteolytic processing of the
-amyloid precursor protein (APP)
is regulated by neurotransmitters. Stimulation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) has been shown to increase the release of
soluble amyloid precursor protein derivatives (APPs) from cultured cells. We examined the effects of mGluR agonists on APP processing in
cortical and hippocampal slices from rat brain. Incubation of the
slices in the presence of L-glutamic acid (500 µM),
trans-(1S,3R)-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentane dicarboxylic acid (1-100 µM) or quisqualic acid (1-100 µM)
increased APP release into the medium, relative to the amount of APPs
released during incubation in normal Krebs-Ringer buffer under basal
conditions. N-Methyl-D-aspartate (1-320 µM),
(±)-
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (1-100
µM) or kainic acid (5-500 µM) did not alter APP release. The
increases in APP release induced by L-glutamic acid (500 µM), trans-(1S,3R)-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentane
dicarboxylic acid (10 µM) or quisqualic acid (10 µM) were blocked
by 100 µM (±)-
-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine, a selective
antagonist of mGluRs. Incubation of the slices in the presence of 1 µM phorbol-12-myrisate-13-acetate, an activator of protein kinase C
(PKC), also increased APP release, and an inhibitor of PKC, GF-109203X
(1 µM), blocked this response as well as the release evoked by mGluR
agonists. These data show that activation of mGluR increases APP
release from brain slices via PKC-dependent mechanisms.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
-amyloid deposits found in brains of patients with Alzheimer's
disease are composed of 39 to 42 amino acid peptides (A
) derived by
proteolytic cleavage of the APP (for reviews, see Checler, 1995
; Maury,
1995
; Selkoe, 1994
). APP is a membrane-spanning secretory glycoprotein
constitutively that is expressed in many types of mammalian cells and
present in high levels in brain cells (Kang et al., 1987
;
Selkoe et al., 1988
;Weidemann et al., 1989
).
Two major pathways of APP processing have been described. In the
constitutive secretory pathway, APP is cleaved within its A
domain
at residue 16 by an uncharacterized protease known as
-secretase
(Esch et al., 1990
; Sisodia, 1990
; Sisodia et
al., 1990
). This process releases large soluble fragments, APPs,
into the extracellular medium, and the smaller membrane-associated intracellular fragment is retained for subsequent cleavage and endocytotic processing (Haass et al., 1993
). The secreted
APPs exhibit neuroprotective and neurotrophic activities in some
experimental systems, protecting primary neuronal cultures from
excitotoxic damage (Mattson et al., 1993
; Barger et
al., 1995
) and promoting neurite outgrowth in PC-12 cells (Milward
et al., 1992
) and cell-to-cell adhesion (Koo et
al., 1993
). The alternative APP secretory processing involves
cleavage at both the amino and the carboxyl termini of A
, followed
by its rapid secretion (Haass et al., 1992
; Schubert et al., 1989
). The secreted A
peptides, when present in
high concentrations or exposed to amyloidotrophic factors, can form insoluble amyloid aggregates that may be toxic to neurons (Bush et al., 1994
; Jarrett and Lansbury, 1993
). The rate of A
production appears to be inversely coupled to that of APP secretion. In
several cell culture systems, enhanced APP secretion is associated with diminished A
production (Buxbaum et al., 1993
; Gabuzda
et al., 1993
; Hung et al., 1993
; Wolf et
al., 1995
), suggesting that the secretory processing of APP to
secreted APPs reduces the formation of potentially amyloidogenic
derivatives.
Studies performed in cell culture show that a variety of extracellular
and intracellular signals can modulate APP processing to favor the
secretion of APPs. Such intracellular signals include PKC (Buxbaum
et al., 1990
; Caporaso et al., 1992
; Slack
et al., 1993
), tyrosine kinases (Slack et al.,
1995
) and calcium levels (Buxbaum et al., 1994
). Activation
of cell-surface receptors enhances the formation of DAG and
inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate from PtdInsP2 and also
increases APP release. Such receptors have been shown to include
muscarinic M1 and M3 (Buxbaum, 1992; Nitsch
et al., 1992
; Wolf et al., 1995
), metabotropic
glutamate (Lee et al., 1995
), serotonin 5-HT2a
and 5-HT2c (Nitsch et al., 1996
), vasopressin (V1a) and bradykinin (B2) types (Nitsch et al., 1995
).
Our laboratory previously showed that electrical stimulation of rat
brain cortical and hippocampal slices caused enhanced APP secretion in
a frequency-dependent, tetradotoxin-sensitive fashion (Nitsch et
al., 1993
); exposure of the slices to muscarinic receptor agonists
had similar effects (Farber et al., 1995
). These findings
demonstrated that the proteolysis of APP to form APPs also occurs in
the central nervous system and that this process can be regulated in
brain by neuronal activation and neurotransmitter receptors. Thus, we
hypothesize that impairments in neurotransmission could exacerbate
amyloid formation in Alzheimer`s disease, particularly in the cortex
and hippocampus. The role of glutamate in cortical or hippocampal APP
processing might be expected to be particularly important inasmuch as
glutamatergic corticocortical connections and hippocampal projections
are highly vulnerable to damage in early stages of Alzheimer`s disease
(Francis et al., 1993
).
Using cell cultures, we recently observed that the release of APPs was
rapidly enhanced by stimulation of mGluRs but not of glutamate
receptors coupled to ligand-gated channels (Lee et al., 1995
). In the present study, we examine the effects of the activation of various glutamate receptors on APP processing in rat cortex and
hippocampus. We find that stimulation of mGluRs in cortical and
hippocampal slices rapidly increases APP release into the medium.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation and perfusion of slices. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (280-350 g) were decapitated, and the brains were rapidly removed and placed in chilled (4°C) oxygenated Krebs-Ringer buffer (see below). After removal of remaining meninges and choroid plexuses, hippocampal and cortical tissues were dissected, and slices 0.3 mm thick were prepared using a McIlwain tissue chopper (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, NY). Slices were washed four times to remove most of the membrane debris and then transferred into eight superfusion chambers (four for hippocampal slices and four for cortical slices). The chambers were kept at 37°C in a water bath, and the slices were perfused for 60 min (for equilibration and for washing away excess APP released during slice preparation) with Krebs-Ringer buffer (120 mM NaCl, 3.5 mM KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3 and 10 mM glucose) at a constant flow rate (0.8 ml/min) using an eight-channel peristaltic pump (Rainin Instrument Co., Woburn, MA). This solution was bubbled continuously with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. After this period, five or six hippocampal and seven or eight cortical slices were transferred into each of eight incubation wells (made from a 24-well tissue culture dish, with the bottom covered with nylon mesh). Slices were incubated in 1 ml of Krebs-Ringer buffer for 20 min; incubation media were replaced by 1 ml of buffer (37°C, oxygenated) every 5 min.
After the 20-min incubation period, slices were incubated for 10 additional min in 1 ml of buffer. The incubation medium was carefully removed, and slices were rinsed with 0.5 ml of the buffer (heated and oxygenated). The incubation and rinsing media were combined for measurement of basal APP release. Slices were then incubated again for one or more 10-min periods in 1 ml of buffer solutions containing the desired concentrations of drugs to be tested. In one set of experiments, KCI concentration was elevated from 3.5 to 50 mM and NaCl concentration was reduced to 73.5 from 120 mM in the buffer during second, third and fourth 10-min incubation periods. At the end of each incubation period, media were removed, and slices were rinsed with 0.5 ml of buffer. The incubation and rinsing media were again combined for measurements of APP release. Such release during the second incubation period was expressed as the percentage of APP release during first 10-min incubation period, and each well was used as its own control.Measurements of secreted APPs. Incubation and rinsing media were collected into 1.5-ml Eppendorff tubes on ice and centrifuged for 15 min at 2500 × g at 4°C to remove debris. Two aliquots (0.4 and 0.8 ml) of the media were blotted directly onto polyvinyldifluoride membranes (Immobilon-P, Waters, Milford, MA) by vacuum filtration, using a slot-blot microfiltration apparatus (Bio-Dot SF, BioRad, Hercules, CA). The remaining binding sites were blocked for 30 min with 4% nonfat dry milk (Carnation, Glendale, CA) in TBST. Membranes were then rinsed five times in TBST and immersed in TBST solution containing the monoclonal antibody 22C11 (Boehringer-Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). After overnight incubation, membranes were rinsed in TBST and then treated for 1 hr with a peroxidase-linked sheep anti-mouse secondary antibody (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL). Bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using linear Kodak X-ray films. Immunoreactive bands were compared densitometrically using a laser scanner (UltraScan XL, Pharmacia LKB, Bromma, Sweden) set at 40-µm vertical intervals and a 3-mm horizontal slit width. Areas under the absorbance curves were expressed as arbitrary units. Areas generated by immunoreactive proteins secreted during the second 10-min incubation under test conditions were normalized as percentages of those generated by immunoreactive proteins secreted from the same slices during the first 10-min period under basal conditions. Measurements were always performed in the linear range. Typically, two aliquots (0.4 and 0.8 ml) of incubation media obtained under basal and test conditions were handled in parallel, processed identically and run in parallel on the same blot. During test incubation periods, control samples (containing no drug and usually from duplicate chambers) were always run in parallel, and the changes in APP release under test conditions were compared with its release from control slices during a second incubation period.
In previous studies from our laboratory (Farber et al., 1995Glutamate and LDH assays.
Glutamate in incubation media was
determined by high performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical
detection as described previously (Bogdanov and Wurtman, 1994
). LDH
activity in 0.5 ml of incubation medium was assayed by using a
commercial assay kit (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO).
Drugs. L-Glutamic acid hydrochloride, NMDA, trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD, AMPA, kainic acid, (±)-quisqualic acid and MCPG were purchased from Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA). PMA and GF-109203X were purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA).
Data analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Analysis of variance and Student`s t test (two-tailed) were used to evaluate differences between groups. Differences were taken to be statistically significant at P < .05.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Basal APP release from cortical and hippocampal slices. The cortical and hippocampal slices incubated in normal Krebs-Ringer media released APPs into the medium at more or less constant rates during four consecutive 10-min incubation periods (table 1).
|
Effects of glutamate receptor agonists on APP release. Effects of L-glutamic acid, trans (1S,3R)-ACPD, quisqualic acid, NMDA, AMPA and kainic acid on APP release from cortical and hippocampal slices are summarized in table 2.
|
Effects of mGluR antagonist on APP release. As seen in table 3, the increases in APP release from cortical or hippocampal slices induced by trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD (10 µM), quisqualic acid (10 µM) or glutamic acid (500 µM) were blocked by MCPG (100 µM). At this dose, MCPG did not alter APP release from either cortical or hippocampal slices (table 3).
|
Effects of PKC activators and inhibitors on APP release. The PKC activator PMA (1 µM) increased APP release by 1.9- or 1.6-fold from cortical or hippocampal slices, respectively (table 4).
|
|
Effects of PKC inhibitors on APP release induced by glutamate receptor agonists. As seen in table 6, GF-109203X (1 µM) prevented the increases in APP release from cortical and hippocampal slices induced by glutamic acid (500 µM), trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD (10 µM) or quisqualic acid (10 µM).
|
Effects of glutamate agonists on LDH activity and glutamate levels in the medium. LDH activities in media incubated with cortical or hippocampal slices were 104 ± 15 µunits/ml (n = 16) or 55 ± 7 µunits/ml, respectively (n = 16), after a 10-min incubation period. Incubation with L-glutamic acid (500 µM), trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD (10 µM) or quisqualic acid (10 µM) failed to affect the activity of the enzyme (table 7).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These data show that the selective mGluR agonist
trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD and the
nonselective glutamate receptor agonists L-glutamic acid
and quisqualic acid, but not the ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists
NMDA, AMPA and kainic acid, increase APP release from rat brain
cortical and hippocampal slices. Furthermore, a selective mGluR
antagonist, MCPG, blocks the increases in APP release from cortical and
hippocampal slices induced by
trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD, L-glutamic acid or quisqualic acid without affecting basal
APP release. Incubation of the slices in physiological media containing a depolarizing concentration of potassium (50 mM) or PMA, an activator of PKC, also increases APP release. A PKC inhibitor, GF-109203X, blocks
the increases in APP release induced by PMA as well as by
L-glutamatic acid,
trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD or quisqualic acid.
Therefore, activation of mGluRs in rat brain enhances APP processing to
APPs, as we previously showed occurs in cultured cells (Lee et
al., 1995
).
These results confirm and extend other reports from our laboratory
(Farber et al., 1995
; Nitsch et al., 1993
)
showing that brain slices release APPs into the medium and that release
is enhanced by depolarizing the slices electrically or by exposing them
to M1 cholinergic receptor agonists. The increase in APP release after potassium depolarization was smaller in magnitude and
shorter lasting than the increases observed in APP release during
electrical stimulation (Farber et al., 1995
). Indeed, in the
present experiments, incubation of cortical and hippocampal slices in
the presence of high potassium concentrations for 30 min
(i.e., three consecutive 10-min periods) caused 1.6- or
1.5-fold increases in APP release from hippocampal and cortical slices during first 10-min incubation period (table 1), but APP release returned to basal levels during the second and third 10-min periods (table 1). In contrast, the increases in APP release from electrically depolarized cortical or hippocampal slices were 2-fold and were maintained for ~30 min (Farber et al., 1995
).
The increases in APP release from hippocampal and cortical brain slices
induced by trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD (table
3) are in good accordance with our laboratory's recent finding (Lee
et al., 1995
) that mGluR stimulation increases APP release
from primary hippocampal primary neuronal cultures. In the present
study, we also observed that L-glutamic acid and quisqualic
acid increase APP release from cortical and hippocampal slices. It is
well known that L-glutamic acid and quisqualic acid
stimulate ionotropic glutamate receptor in addition to mGluR. This
raised the possibility that L-glutamic acid and quisqualic
acid might also enhance APP secretion by stimulating Ca++
influx via ligand-gated channels activated by ionotropic
glutamate receptor. This seems unlikely for two reasons. First,
selective stimulation of ionotropic NMDA receptors by NMDA or of
AMPA/kainate receptors by AMPA or kainate failed to affect APP release
(table 2) across a wide range of drug concentrations (1-500 µM).
Second, the increases in APP release induced by the selective mGluR
agonist trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD, as well as
by L-glutamic acid or quisqualic acid, could be prevented
by MCPG (table 3), which effectively and competitively blocks
mGluR-mediated effects without inhibiting ionotropic glutamate
receptor-mediated effects (Eaton et al., 1993
; Thomsen
et al., 1994
).
The mGluR family is heterogeneous and comprises eight different
subtypes classified into three major groups on the basis of receptor
sequence homologies, agonist and antagonist pharmacology and the signal
transduction pathway with which they couple (for reviews, see
Nakanishi, 1992
; Schoepp and Conn, 1993
; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995
). Group
I mGluRs, comprising mGluR1
and mGluR5, are coupled to
PtdInsP2 hydrolysis/calcium mobilization (Abe et al., 1992
; Aramori and Nakanishi, 1992
). Group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3) and group III (mGluR4-8) metabotropic receptors are linked to
inhibition of adenylate cyclase and reduced cAMP formation (Nakanishi,
1992
; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995
; Schoepp and Conn, 1993
). mGluR1/mGluR5
and mGluR2/mGluR3 receptors are sensitive to
trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD, as well as to
quisgualate and glutamate, as an agonist (Nakanishi, 1992
; Pin and
Duvoisin, 1995
; Schoepp and Conn, 1993
) and to MCPG as a competitive
antagonist (Hayashi et al., 1994
; Thomsen et al.,
1994
). It is well known that the activation of mGluR1/mGluR5 by
glutamate, quisqualate or
trans-(1S,3R)-ACPD results in
PtdInsP2 hydrolysis/calcium mobilization (Hayashi et
al., 1994
; Kingston et al., 1995
; Tanabe et
al., 1993
), which is effectively blocked by MCPG (Hayashi et
al., 1994
; Kingston et al., 1995
; Roberts, 1995
) and,
consequently, PKC activation (Nishizuka, 1992
). In the present study,
direct activation of PKC by PMA increased APP release from both
cortical and hippocampal slices. This effect of PMA was blocked by the
specific PKC inhibitor GF-109203X. Moreover, the increase in APP
release induced by glutamatergic agonists was also blocked effectively
by GF-109203X. These observations agree with our laboratory's previous
report on cultured cells (Lee et al., 1995
) and show that
activation of PKC plays a major role in the stimulation by mGluR of APP
release from cortical and hippocampal slices. In other studies using
established cell cultures, it has been shown that PMA (Caporaso
et al., 1992
; Lee et al., 1995
; Slack et
al., 1993
) or activation of cell-surface receptors coupled to
PtdInsP2 hydrolysis (Buxbaum et al., 1992
; Lee
et al., 1995
; Nitsch et al., 1992
) can increase
APP secretion and decrease A
formation.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that mGluRs are coupled to APP proteolysis and APP release in cortical and hippocampal slices. The increase in APP induced by mGluR agonists is mimicked by phorbol esters and blocked by PKC inhibitors, suggesting that PKC activation mediates APP secretion.
In Alzheimer`s disease brains, glutamatergic transmission is severely
impaired by the early degeneration of corticocortical connections and
hippocampal projections (Francis et al., 1993
). Because both
of these brain regions accumulate amyloid and are components of neural
systems involved in memory and learning, the decrease in glutamatergic
transmission may contribute to the accumulation of amyloid plaques and,
secondarily, to memory dysfunction and progressive dementia. The
present observations suggest that metabotropic glutamate agonists might
be clinically useful for the treatment of Alzheimer`s disease, all the
more so when it is borne in mind that glutamate agonists can also
increase cortical acetylcholine release (Ulus et al., 1992
).
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication December 23, 1996.
Received for publication June 24, 1996.
1 These studies were supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (M. H.-28783) and the Center for Brain Sciences and Metabolism Charitable Trust.
2 Present address: Department of Pharmacology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Bursa, Turkey.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. R. J. Wurtman, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E25-604, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
APP,
-amyloid precursor protein;
mGluR, metabotropic glutamate receptor;
APP, soluble amyloid precursor protein
derivative;
trans-(1S, 3R)-ACPD,
trans-(1S,3R)-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentane
dicarboxylic acid;
NMDA, N-methyl-d-aspartic acid;
AMPA, (±)
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid;
MCPG, (±)-
-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine;
PMA, phorbol-12-myrisate-13-acetate;
PKC, protein kinase C;
LDH, lactic
dehydrogenase;
DAG, diacylglycerol;
PtdInsP2, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate;
TBST, Tris-buffered
saline/0.05% Tween.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
amyloid formation by zinc.
Science
265: 1465-1467, 1994.
/A4 peptide.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90: 9195-9198, 1993
/A4 amyloid precursor protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89: 3055-3059, 1992
-amyloid precursor protein and its regulation in Alzheimer`s disease.
J. Neurochem.
65: 1431-1444, 1995[Medline].
-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine.
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
244: 195-197, 1993[Medline].
-amyloid precursor protein in rat brain.
J. Neurosci.
15: 7442-7451, 1995[Abstract].
-amyloid production by activation of protein kinase C.
J. Neurochem.
61: 2326-2329, 1993[Medline].
-Amyloid peptide and a 3-kDa fragment are derived by distinct cellular mechanisms.
J. Biol. Chem.
268: 3021-3024, 1993
-protein is produced by cultured cells during normal metabolism.
Nature
359: 322-325, 1992[Medline].
-amyloidosis in Alzheimer`s disease and other cerebral amyloidoses.
Lab. Invest.
72: 4-16, 1995[Medline].
protein precursor derivatives by electrical depolarization of rat hippocampal slices.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90: 5191-5193, 1993
-protein precursor by first messengers: A novel potential approach for the treatment of Alzheimer`s disease.
Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Res.
45: 435-438, 1995.
protein precursor secretion and its modulatory role in cell adhesion.
Neuron
3: 689-694, 1989[Medline].
-Amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer`s disease occurs as 110- to 135-kilodalton membrane-associated proteins in neurol and nonneural tissues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85: 7341-7345, 1988
-Amyloid precursor protein cleavage by a membrane-bound protease.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89: 6075-6079, 1990
-amyloid protein in Alzheimer`s disease is not derived by normal processing.
Science
248: 492-495, 1990
.
J. Biol. Chem.
268: 21097-21101, 1993
-protein production in human neuronal NT2N cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270: 4916-4922, 1995This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. K. K. Lee, S. Knapp, and R. J. Wurtman Prostaglandin E2 Stimulates Amyloid Precursor Protein Gene Expression: Inhibition by Immunosuppressants J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jolly-Tornetta, Z.-y. Gao, V. M.-Y. Lee, and B. A. Wolf Regulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretion by Glutamate Receptors in Human Ntera 2 Neurons (NT2N) J. Biol. Chem., May 29, 1998; 273(22): 14015 - 14021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||