Synthélabo Recherche, CNS Research Department (H.S., Y.C.,
D.F., L.R., O.C., A.O., C.C., J.B., B.S.), Bagneux, France and
Centre
Hospitalier Lyon-Sud (K.C., F.G.), Pierre-Bénite, France
The benzamide derivative amisulpride shows a unique therapeutic profile
being antipsychotic, at high doses, and disinhibitory, at low doses,
while giving rise to only a low incidence of extrapyramidal side
effects. In vitro, amisulpride has high affinity and
selectivity for the human dopamine D2
(Ki = 2.8 nM) and D3
(Ki = 3.2 nM) receptors. Amisulpride shows
antagonist properties toward D3 and both pre- and
postsynaptic D2-like dopamine receptors of the rat striatum or nucleus accumbens in vitro. At low doses (
10 mg/kg)
amisulpride preferentially blocks presynaptic dopamine autoreceptors
that control dopamine synthesis and release in the rat, whereas at higher doses (40-80 mg/kg) postsynaptic dopamine D2
receptor occupancy and antagonism is apparent. In contrast, haloperidol
is active in all of these paradigms within the same dose range.
Amisulpride preferentially inhibits in vivo binding of the
D2/D3 antagonist [3H]raclopride
to the limbic system (ID50 = 17 mg/kg) in comparison to the
striatum (ID50 = 44 mg/kg) of the rat, increases striatal and limbic tissue 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels with similar potency and efficacy, and preferentially increases extracellular 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels in the nucleus accumbens when
compared to the striatum. Haloperidol shows similar potency for the
displacement of in vivo [3H]raclopride binding
in striatal and limbic regions and preferentially increases striatal
tissue 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels. The present data
characterize amisulpride as a specific dopamine receptor antagonist
with high and similar affinity for the dopamine D2 and
D3 receptor. In vivo, it displays a degree of
limbic selectivity and a preferential effect, at low doses, on dopamine
D2/D3 autoreceptors. This atypical profile may
explain the therapeutic efficacy of amisulpride in the treatment of
both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
 |
Introduction |
Clinically, atypical neuroleptics
are defined as drugs active in the treatment of schizophrenia but with
a lesser propensity than conventional neuroleptics to induce
extrapyramidal side effects. Furthermore, some neuroleptics, such as
clozapine, are considered atypical because of their therapeutic
efficacy in the treatment of schizophenic patients resistant to
conventional neuroleptics.
Most neuroleptics display high affinity for the dopamine D2
receptor subtype in direct relation to their therapeutic potency or
plasma concentration at therapeutically active doses (Seeman, 1992
). It
has thus been suggested that the atypical characteristics of certain
neuroleptics necessarily derive from additional pharmacological properties, such as antagonism toward 5-HT2A or
5-HT2C, muscarinic cholinergic or alpha-1
adrenergic receptors (Meltzer, 1991
; Schmidt et al., 1995
),
or an interaction with
recognition sites (Ferris et al.,
1991
).
Molecular biological techniques have recently provided evidence that
the dopamine D1 receptor comprises a class of receptors, positively coupled to adenylate cyclase, that includes, besides the
classical D1 receptor (also termed D1A), the
D5 or D1B receptor (Sunahara et al.,
1991
) and possibly the mammalian equivalents of the D1C
(Sugamori et al., 1994
) and D1D (Demchyshyn
et al., 1995
) receptors. Similarly, the dopamine
D2 receptor family is now thought to include the
D2, D3 (Sokoloff et al., 1990
) and D4 (Van Tol et al., 1991
) subtypes. In
particular, the D3 and D4 receptor subtypes
have generated recent interest as potential therapeutic targets in the
treatment of schizophrenia because of their preferential limbic
localization (Sokoloff et al., 1990
; Van Tol et
al., 1991
). The D3 subtype is selectively recognized by several agonists and antagonists known for their selectivity for the
dopamine autoreceptor (Sokoloff et al., 1992a
, c), although it is present mainly on dopaminoceptive cells, in particular in the
limbic system (Sokoloff et al., 1990
, 1992c
). Thus it has been suggested that stimulation of a postsynaptic dopamine
D3 receptor might be inhibitory to rat locomotor activity
(Svensson et al., 1994
; Waters et al., 1993b
).
The D4 receptor represents the subtype of D2
receptors for which clozapine shows the highest affinity (Van Tol
et al., 1991
).
Amisulpride (fig. 1) is a substituted benzamide
derivative with dopamine receptor antagonist properties in
vitro and in vivo (Chivers et al., 1988
;
Perrault et al., 1997
; Scatton et al., 1994
;
Sokoloff et al., 1990
). Although in clinical studies its efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia has been clearly
demonstrated, its most notable characteristic is its atypical profile.
Thus, although amisulpride is efficacious in treating the positive
symptoms of schizophrenia, it does so at doses (400-1200 mg/day) that, according to present experience, have only a low propensity to induce
extrapyramidal side effects. In addition, amisulpride possesses disinhibitory effects at lower doses (50-300 mg/day) and is
successfully used, at these doses, in treatment of the negative
symptoms of schizophrenia and of dysthymia, a form of chronic
depression (Boyer et al., 1990
; Boyer et al.,
1995
; Delcker et al., 1990
; Paillere Martinot et
al., 1995
; Saletu et al., 1994
). These atypical
therapeutic characteristics of amisulpride may be a reflection of its
atypical neuropharmacological profile. Thus, amisulpride, similarly to classical neuroleptics, antagonizes the hyperactivity or stereotypies that result from the direct or indirect activation of postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors by (high doses of) dopaminomimetics such as
apomorphine or amphetamine in the rat (Perrault et al.,
1997
). Nevertheless, amisulpride does not provoke catalepsy in the rat, which is characteristic of postsynaptic D2 blockade, even
at doses maximally effective in these experimental paradigms (Perrault et al., 1997
). At lower doses, amisulpride potentiates
apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice,
particularly favoring a transition from sniffing to gnawing behavior
(Vasse et al., 1985
). Furthermore, low doses of amisulpride
inhibit hypokinesia induced by the administration of low doses of
apomorphine, 7-OH-DPAT or quinpirole in rats (Perrault et
al., 1997
). Classical neuroleptics such as haloperidol are devoid
of such prostereotypic effects and inhibit the diverse behavioral
effects of dopamine agonists within the same dose range.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amisulpride,
(±)-4-amino-N-1((1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl)-5-(ethylsulphonyl)-2-methoxybenzamide.
|
|
Various hypotheses have been put forward to explain the spectrum of
animal behaviors provoked by dopaminomimetics and the dichotomy in
their antagonism by atypical neuroleptics. These include the presence
of behaviorally suppressant dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens
(Waters et al., 1993b
) or frontal cortex (Carter and Pycock,
1980
) and the presence of inhibitory dopamine autoreceptors (Di Chiara
et al., 1986
). Thus, in addition to postsynaptic dopamine
receptors, D2-like autoreceptors have been amply
demonstrated and are thought to be involved in the regulation of
neuronal firing (Lejeune and Millan, 1995
), dopamine release
(Suaud-Chagny et al., 1991
) and tyrosine hydroxylase
activation (Claustre et al., 1985
; Walters and Roth, 1976
).
Their molecular identity, however, remains subject to debate.
Alternatively, drug activity at nondopaminergic receptors, such as
alpha-1 adrenoceptors (Wiszniowska-Szafraniec et
al., 1983
), 5-HT receptor subtypes (Carter and Pycock, 1981
; Mogilnicka et al., 1977
), beta adrenergic
receptors (Costall et al., 1978
), muscarinic cholinergic
receptors (Christensen et al., 1976
) and histamine
H1 receptors (Dadkar et al., 1976
), may modulate the expression of dopamine receptor activation or blockade.
In view of the established atypical profile of amisulpride in the
treatment of schizophrenia and dysthymia, and in view of current
hypotheses with respect to dopamine receptor subtypes and the possible
contribution of nondopaminergic effects to neuroleptic atypicity, we
have sought to define its neurochemical characteristics and mechanism
of action, largely in comparison with that of the typical neuroleptic
haloperidol. To this end, we studied the interaction of amisulpride
with a variety of drug receptor and recognition sites in
vitro, which demonstrated that amisulpride is highly specific and
selective for both the dopamine D2 and D3
receptor subtypes. Its antagonist character was demonstrated in
vitro by its inhibition of dopamine D3
receptor-mediated mitogenesis and by its pre- and postsynaptic effects
on neurotransmitter release and was demonstrated in vivo by
its effects on indices of dopamine synthesis, release and metabolism
and on ACh levels. These studies show that amisulpride displays a
degree of limbic selectivity and a preferential effect, at low doses,
on D2/D3 autoreceptors as compared with the
classical neuroleptic, haloperidol.
The behavioral characteristics of amisulpride are described in a
companion paper (Perrault et al., 1997
).
Some of the data presented here have previously been reported in
abstract form (Scatton et al., 1994
; Schoemaker et
al., 1995).
 |
Materials and Methods |
Animals.
Unless otherwise indicated, adult male
Sprague-Dawley rats (OFA or COBS, Iffa Credo, St. Germain sur
l'arbresle, France, or Charles River, St. Aubin-les-Elbeus, France),
Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs (Iffa Credo) and Fauves de Bourgogne rabbits
(ESD, Romans, France) were used.
Throughout these studies, the phrase the limbic system
refers to the nucleus accumbens and the olfactory tubercle.
Materials and drugs.
Pig choroid plexi and bovine caudate
nuclei were obtained from CollectOrgane (Paris, France). Cell lines
expressing the human dopamine receptor subtypes or membrane
preparations thereof were obtained from: D1 and
D5 (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA), D2S and
D3 (Dr. J.-C. Schwartz, INSERM, Paris, France),
D4.4 (Receptor Biology, Baltimore, MD).
Radioligands were obtained from the following sources:
[3H]spiperone, [3H]SCH 23390, [3H]GBR12935, [3H]prazosin,
[3H]clonidine, [3H]dihydroalprenolol,
[3H]desipramine, [3H]serotonin,
[3H]quipazine, [3H]quinuclidinyl benzylate,
[3H]pyrilamine, [3H]flumazenil,
[3H]TBOB, [3H]nipecotic acid,
[3H]strychnine, [3H]CGP 39653, [3H]glycine, [3H]MK801,
[3H]AMPA, [3H]kainate,
[3H]angiotensin II,
[5-methyl-3H]-nitrendipine,
[benzoyl-2,5-3H]-batrachotoxinin A 20-
-benzoate,
[3H]Ro5-4864, [3H]raclopride,
[3H]dopamine, [14C]choline,
[125I]angiotensin II (New England Nulear/DuPont de
Nemours, Boston, MA); [125I]iodosulpride,
[3H]7-OH-DPAT, [3H]mesulergine,
[3H]GR 113808, ((
)N6-R[G-3H]-phenylisopropyladenosine,
5
-N-ethylcarboxamido [8(n)-3H]-adenosine,
[3H]idazoxan, [3H]thymidine (Amersham,
Little Chalfont, UK); [3H]8-OH-DPAT (CEA, Saclay,
France); [3H]GABA (Dositek, Orsay, France).
[3H]ifenprodil was custom-synthesized by Amersham.
Amisulpride, sulpride, haloperidol, remoxipride, clozapine and
7-OH-DPAT were synthesized at Synthélabo Recherche (Bagneux,
France). All other chemicals were obtained commercially at the highest
purity available.
Drugs were administered through the i.p. route, except when indicated
otherwise; control groups received an equal volume of the corresponding
vehicle. Amisulpride was administered as a hydrochloride salt. Doses
refer to the free base equivalent.
Radioligand binding studies in vitro.
Studies of
radioligand binding to various receptor and/or drug recognition sites
were performed essentially as described by the authors indicated: the
human dopamine D2 receptor expressed in CHO cells (1.0 nM
[125I]iodosulpride; Sokoloff et al., 1992a
),
the human dopamine D3 receptor expressed in CHO cells (0.2 nM [125I]iodosulpride; Sokoloff et al.,
1992a
), the human dopamine D4.4 receptor expressed in CHO
cells (0.5 nM [3H]spiperone; Van Tol et al.,
1991
), the human dopamine D1 receptor in Sf9 cells (1.6 nM
[3H]SCH23390; Sunahara et al., 1991
), the
human dopamine D5 receptor expressed in Sf9 cells (1.8 nM
[3H]SCH23390; Sunahara et al., 1991
), the
dopamine D1 receptor in rat striatum (0.3 nM
[3H]SCH23390; Billard et al., 1984
), the
dopamine D2 receptor in rat striatum (0.3 nM
[3H]spiperone; Briley and Langer, 1978
), the dopamine
D3 receptor in bovine caudate nucleus (0.8 nM
[3H]7-OH-DPAT in the presence of 0.2 µM eliprodil;
Schoemaker, 1993
), the plasma membrane dopamine transporter from the
rat striatum (1 nM [3H]GBR12935; Janowsky et
al., 1986
), the alpha-1A adrenoceptor in the rat
salivary gland (0.2 nM [3H]prazosin; Faure et
al., 1994
), the alpha-1B adrenoceptor in the rat liver
(0.1 nM [3H]prazosin; Faure et al., 1994
), the
alpha-2 adrenoceptor in the rat cerebral cortex (5 nM
[3H]clonidine; Pimoule and Langer, 1982
), the
beta adrenoceptor in the rat cerebral cortex (2 nM
[3H]dihydroalprenolol; Mogilnicka et al.,
1980
), the plasma membrane noradrenaline transporter from the rat vas
deferens (2 nM [3H]desipramine; Raisman et
al., 1982
), the 5-HT1A receptor in rat hippocampus (1 nM [3H]8-OH-DPAT in the presence of 3 µM paroxetine;
Sanger and Schoemaker, 1992
; Schoemaker and Langer, 1986
), the
5-HT1B receptor in rat striatum (5 nM
[3H]5-HT in the presence of 100 nM 8-OH-DPAT and 100 nM
mesulergine; Herrick-Davis et al., 1988
; Heuring and
Peroutka, 1987
; Peroutka, 1986
), the 5-HT1D receptor in
bovine caudate nucleus (2 nM [3H]5-HT in the presence of
100 nM 8-OH-DPAT and 100 nM mesulergine; Herrick-Davis et
al., 1988
; Heuring and Peroutka, 1987
), the 5-HT2A receptor in rat cerebral cortex (0.4 nM [3H]spiperone;
Hicks et al., 1984
), the 5-HT2C receptor in the
pig choroid plexus (1 nM [3H]mesulergine; Pazos et
al., 1984
; Yagaloff and Hartig, 1986
), the 5-HT3
receptor in the rat cerebral cortex (0.8-0.9 nM
[3H]quipazine in the presence of 10 nM ketanserin and 100 nM paroxetine; Angel et al., 1993
), the 5-HT4
receptor in the guinea pig striatum (0.1 nM [3H]GR
113808; Grossman et al., 1993
), the muscarinic cholinergic receptor in the rat cortex (0.3 nM [3H]quinuclidinyl
benzylate; Yamamura and Snyder, 1974
), the histamine H1
receptor in the guinea pig cerebellum (1 nM
[3H]pyrilamine; Tran et al., 1978
), the
GABAA receptor in rat brain (4 nM [3H]GABA;
Langer et al., 1985
), the
1/benzodiazepine
receptor in the rat cerebellum (1 nM [3H]flumazenil;
Arbilla et al., 1985
), the
2/benzodiazepine
receptor in the rat spinal cord (1 nM [3H]flumazenil;
Arbilla et al., 1985
), the
5/benzodiazepine
receptor in the rat hippocampus (1 nM [3H]flumazenil in
the presence of 5 µM zolpidem; Tan and Schoemaker, 1993
), the
picrotoxin site of the GABAA receptor channel in the rat
cerebral cortex (2 nM [3H]TBOB; Van Rijn et
al., 1990
), the GABAB receptor in rat brain (10 nM
[3H]GABA; Hill and Bowery, 1981
), the presynaptic GABA
transporter in the rat cerebral cortex (5 µM
[3H]nipecotic acid; Vargas et al., 1993
), the
strychnine-sensitive glycine receptor in the rat spinal cord (2 nM
[3H]strychnine; Young and Snyder, 1974
; Young and Snyder,
1973
), the glutamate recognition site of the NMDA receptor in whole rat brain (1.5 nM [3H]CGP 39653; Sills et al.,
1991
), the strychnine-insensitive glycine recognition site of the NMDA
receptor in the whole rat brain (14-17 nM [3H]glycine;
Kishimoto et al., 1981
; Zukin et al., 1974
), the
polyamine-sensitive modulatory site of the NMDA receptor complex in the
rat cerebral cortex (1 nM [3H]ifenprodil in the presence
of 3 µM GBR 12909; Schoemaker et al., 1991
), the NMDA
receptor-ion channel site in well-washed membranes from the whole rat
brain (2 nM [3H]MK801; Reynolds et al., 1987
;
Wong et al., 1988
), the quisqualate/AMPA subtype of
glutamate receptors in the rat brain (4 nM [3H]AMPA;
Honoré et al., 1982
; Honoré and Drejer, 1988
),
the kainate subtype of glutamate receptors in the rat brain (2 nM
[3H]kainate; Simon et al., 1976
), the
adenosine A1 receptor in rat hippocampal membranes (3 nM
(
)N6-R[G-3H]-phenylisopropyladenosine;
Schwabe and Trost, 1980
), the adenosine A2 receptor in rat
striatal membranes (4 nM
5
-N-ethylcarboxamido[8(n)-3H]-adenosine in the presence
of 50 nM N6-cyclopentyladenosine; Bruns et al.,
1986
), the angiotensin II AT1 receptor in rabbit
adrenocortical membranes (2 nM [3H]angiotensin II;
Glossmann et al., 1974
), the angiotensin II AT2
receptor in membranes from the rat adrenal medulla (0.1 nM [125I]angiotensin II; Glossmann et al., 1974
),
the L-type Ca++ channel in rat cerebral cortex (0.1 nM
[5-methyl-3H]-nitrendipine; Schoemaker and Langer, 1989
),
the Na+ channel in rat cerebral cortex (2 nM
[benzoyl-2,5-3H]-batrachotoxinin A 20-
-benzoate in the
presence of 1 µM tetrodotoxin and scorpion toxin; Pauwels et
al., 1986
),
recognition sites in rat cortex (0.5 nM
[3H]ifenprodil; Schoemaker et al., 1991
), the
p-site (peripheral benzodiazepine receptor) in the rat kidney (0.5 nM
[3H]Ro 5-4864; Schoemaker et al., 1983
), the
imidazoline I2 recognition site in the whole rat brain (1 nM [3H]idazoxan in the presence of 10 µM
(
)adrenaline; Le Rouzic et al., 1995
).
Radioactivity was quantified using liquid scintillation spectometry.
Data from radioligand inhibition experiments were evaluated by
graphical methods or by linear or nonlinear regression analysis when
appropriate and, unless indicated otherwise, are presented as the drug
concentration required to inhibit 50% of specific radioligand binding
(IC50) or are converted to Ki values
as described by Cheng and Prusoff (1973)
.
Dopamine D3 receptor-stimulated mitogenic activity
in vitro.
The functional effects of amisulpride at the
dopamine D3 receptor subtype were assessed as described by
Pilon et al. (1994)
and Sautel et al. (1995)
.
Briefly, the mitogenic response elicited in NG108-15
neuroblastoma-glioma cells stably transfected with human dopamine
D3 receptor cDNA by the addition of 10 nM quinpirole in the
presence of 1 µM forskolin was quantified by the incorporation of
[3H]thymidine. Antagonism of quinpirole-induced
mitogenesis was measured in the presence of increasing (0.1-100 nM)
concentrations of amisulpride.
Radioligand binding studies in vivo.
In
vivo [3H]raclopride binding to rat brain structures
was measured according to a previously described procedure
(Köhler et al., 1985
). The radioligand (9 µCi/200
µl) was injected into the tail vein of male Sprague-Dawley rats 45 min before sacrifice. Test drug or vehicle was administered in a final
volume of 1 ml 75 min before [3H]raclopride. Brain
structures (striatum, limbic system and cerebellum) were dissected by
hand, and the incorporated radioactivity was measured after overnight
digestion in 0.5 ml of Soluene. The radioactivity incorporated into the
cerebellum was taken as nonspecific binding.
[3H]Spiperone binding in vivo was studied
according to a similar protocol. The radioligand (5 µCi/200 µl) was
administered into the tail vein 60 min before sacrifice. Drug or
vehicle was given 60 min before the radioligand.
Neurotransmitter release in vitro.
The modulation of
electrically evoked [3H]dopamine and
[14C]ACh release from slices (1 × 1 × 0.3 mm)
of the rat striatum and nucleus accumbens was studied essentially as
described by Arbilla and Langer (1984)
. Briefly, slices were incubated
with 0.1 µM [3H]dopamine and 19 µM
[14C]choline for 30 min at 37°C in Krebs buffer (mM:
NaCl, 118; KCl, 4.7; CaCl2, 1.3; MgCl2, 1.2;
NaH2PO4, 1.0; NaHCO3, 25.0;
glucose, 11.0; EDTA, 0.04, equilibrated with 5% CO2/95%
O2). Slices were then washed, transferred to superfusion
chambers (1 slice/chamber) and superfused with Krebs buffer
supplemented with 10 µM hemicholinium-3 for 60 min at a flow rate of
0.7 or 1 ml/min. After this period, fractions (7 and 6 min,
respectively) were collected until the end of the experiment. Slices
were initially stimulated electrically (2 min, 3 Hz, 2 ms, 16 mA) in
the absence of amisulpride or 7-OH-DPAT, 74 min after the beginning of
the superfusion, and were stimulated 40 min thereafter in their
presence. Amisulpride or 7-OH-DPAT was added to the superfusion buffer
20 min before the second stimulation period. When the interaction
between amisulpride and 7-OH-DPAT was studied, amisulpride was present
in the superfusion buffer as of 20 min before the first stimulation
period. In each case, the stimulation-evoked [3H] and
[14C] overflow (S1 and S2,
respectively) was calculated with respect to the spontaneous outflow
(sp1 and sp2, respectively) in the fractions
immediately before stimulation. Although both the neurotransmitter and
derived metabolites probably contribute to stimulation-evoked [3H] and [14C] overflow (see, for instance,
Parker and Cubeddu, 1985
), the terms [3H]dopamine and
[14C]ACh are used for convenience.
Microdialysis studies.
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were
anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg), and guide cannulae were
stereotaxically implanted onto the dura mater above the striatum and
the nucleus accumbens (+0.7 mm anterior, +3 mm lateral and +1.7 mm
anterior, +1.0 mm lateral from bregma, respectively) (Paxinos and
Watson, 1982
). At least 5 days after surgery, microdialysis probes
(Carnegy Medicine) 250 µm in diameter with an exposed membrane length
of 4 (striatum) and 2 (nucleus accumbens) mm were positioned within the
guide cannulae (vertical coordinates:
7 mm and
8 mm, respectively, from the dura surface) and perfused with artificial CSF (mM: NaCl, 147;
KCl, 4; CaCl2, 1.2; MgCl2, 1.0) using a CMA/100
pump (BAS) at a flow rate of 2 µl/min. Twenty-minute dialysate
fractions were collected in a valve loop and analyzed online using HPLC with electrochemical detection. The average concentration of five stable fractions immediately preceding drug administration was defined
as the 100% control value.
Electrically evoked dopamine release in vivo.
Presynaptic autoregulation of electrically evoked dopamine release in
the rat olfactory tubercle was studied in vivo as described by Suaud-Chagny et al. (1991)
. Briefly, dopamine release was
monitored every 1 s with electrochemically treated
12-µm-diameter carbon-fiber electrodes (1.6 mm lateral, 1.7 mm
anterior to bregma and 9.0 mm below the cortical surface) combined with
differential pulse amperometry with the final potential adjusted to +85
mV. Bipolar stimulating electrodes were implanted in the ascending
dopaminergic pathway at 1.2 mm lateral and 4.0 mm posterior to bregma,
at a depth adjusted for each experiment so that the stimulation-evoked dopamine response was maximal. Electrical stimulation was by twenty 1-s
trains of six square wave form current pulses (pulse interval 70 ms,
250 µA, 0.5 ms) and was repeated every 10 min.
Monoamines and metabolites in vivo.
Two hours after
drug administration, animals were sacrificed by decapitation, and the
brain structures (frontal cortex, striatum and limbic system) were
dissected on ice. Samples were then weighed, homogenized in 20 volumes
of 0.1 M HClO4 and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Dopamine and DOPAC levels were measured in the supernatant by HPLC with electrochemical detection as described previously (Sermerdjian-Rouquier et al., 1981
). ACh and
choline levels were measured in aliquots of a buffered supernatant (0.5 M Tris-citrate, pH 4) by HPLC with electrochemical detection using platinum electrodes (Asano et al., 1986
).
Measurement of dopamine and 5-HT synthesis rates.
The rate
of dopamine and 5-HT synthesis was estimated by measuring the
accumulation of dopa and 5-HTP, respectively, 30 min after the
administration of NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg) (Claustre et al.,
1985
). The presynaptic modulation of dopamine synthesis (Walters and
Roth, 1976
) was studied by co-administration of
-hydroxy-butyric acid (750 mg/kg) 45 min before sacrifice. Amisulpride and 7-OH-DPAT were given 75 and 15 min, respectively, before
-hydroxy-butyric acid. Dopa and 5-HTP levels were measured by HPLC with electrochemical detection according to Sermerdjian-Rouquier et al. (1981)
.
Statistical analyses.
Statistical differences between groups
were assessed using the ANOVA test, followed by Dunnett's or Duncan's
test where appropriate. Simple statistical comparisons were done using
a two-tailed Student's t test. ED50 values for
drug inhibition of in vivo radioligand binding in the
striatum and limbic system were tested for statistical identity using
the partial F test.
 |
Results |
In vitro radioligand binding studies.
Amisulpride
shows high affinity toward the cloned and stably transfected human
dopamine D2 (Ki = 2.8 ± 0.4 nM; n = 7) and D3
(Ki = 3.2 ± 0.3 nM; n = 7)
receptor subtypes labeled with [125I]iodosulpiride and
fails to recognize the D1, D4 and
D5 receptor subtypes. Both haloperidol and clozapine
recognize all human dopamine receptor subtypes (table
1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1
Affinity of amisulpride for molecularly identified human dopamine
receptor subtypes in vitro
Studies of radioligand binding to human dopamine receptor subtypes
transfected into CHO (D2 receptor family) or Sf9
(D1 receptor family) cells were performed as described in
"Materials and Methods". Data represent the mean of at least two
independent experiments performed in duplicate.
|
|
In agreement with its high affinity for the human D2 and
D3 receptor subtypes, amisulpride potently inhibits
radioligand binding to the native dopamine D2 receptor in
membranes from the rat striatum (IC50 = 21 nM, table
2). Similarly, amisulpride recognizes the native bovine
dopamine D3 receptor labeled with
[3H]7-OH-DPAT, at low concentrations (IC50 = 2.9 nM). The selectivity of amisulpride for dopamine receptors of the
D2 family was studied using [3H]SCH23390 to
label the D1 receptor in the rat striatum; amisulpride fails to affect the binding of this radioligand at concentrations up to
10 µM. In contrast, haloperidol inhibits radioligand binding to the
native dopamine D2 receptor at lower concentrations than in
the case of the D3 receptor and, in addition, recognizes
the native D1 receptor subtype (table 2). Clozapine
recognizes these three dopamine receptor subtypes with similar
affinity. The dopamine D4 and D5 receptors are
currently not accessible to radioligand binding studies in their native
state.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2
Inhibitory effects of amisulpride against radioligand binding to native
receptor and drug recognition sites in vitro
Drug inhibition of radioligand binding to native receptor and drug
recognition sites in vitro was studied as described in "Materials and Methods".
|
|
Amisulpride was devoid of significant affinity (IC50 > 1 µM) for radioligand binding to a variety of other neurotransmitter receptors and/or drug recognition sites (table 2), which attested to
its selectivity. Both haloperidol and clozapine recognize with high
affinity the 5-HT2A serotonergic and the alpha-1
adrenergic receptor subtypes. In addition, haloperidol inhibits
radioligand binding to
-sites, whereas clozapine affects binding to
5-HT2C, 5-HT3 and H1 histamine
receptors.
In vivo radioligand binding studies.
[3H]Raclopride selectively recognizes D2 and
D3 receptors in vitro and may be used as a label
for D2-like receptors in vivo (Köhler
et al., 1985
). Amisulpride displaces
[3H]raclopride binding in vivo (fig.
2) with an ED50 value of 17.3 ± 1.86 mg/kg in the rat limbic system but is significantly (P < .05)
less active in displacing binding in the striatum (ED50 = 43.6 ± 6.2 mg/kg; table 3). Like amisulpride,
sulpiride is more potent in displacing [3H]raclopride
binding in the limbic system, whereas remoxipride and haloperidol show
similar activity in both brain regions.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Displacement by amisulpride of
[3H]raclopride binding to the rat striatum and limbic
system in vivo. Data represent specific [3H]raclopride binding, the cerebellum being used as a
measure of nonspecific binding, and are the mean with S.E.M. of results
obtained from six rats per group. Test drugs were administered 75 min
before the radioligand.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3
Comparative potencies of several neuroleptics at inhibiting in
vivo[3H]raclopride-specific binding in the rat striatum
and limbic structures
In vivo [3H]raclopride binding to the striatum,
the limbic system and the cerebellum, taken to represent nonspecific
binding, amounted to 270, 80 and 27 dpm/mg tissue, respectively.
Specific binding to the striatum and to the limbic system accounted for 90% and 70% of the total binding, respectively. ED50 values,
shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6/group), represent
the estimated doses required to produce a half-maximal inhibition of
radioligand binding. Drugs were administered 75 min before sacrifice.
|
|
Spiperone similarly recognizes dopamine D2 and
D3 receptors (Sokoloff et al., 1990
) and, in
addition, labels the 5-HT2 receptor in vivo
(Laduron et al., 1978
). [3H]Spiperone binding
to D2-like receptors in vivo is significantly (P < .05) more sensitive to inhibition by amisulpride in the
limbic system than in the striatum (ED50 = 29 ± 5 and
87 ± 9 mg/kg, respectively; n = 5-14/group).
[3H]Spiperone binding in the frontal cortex, which mainly
represents 5-HT2 receptors (Laduron et al.,
1978
), is not affected by amisulpride at doses up to 100 mg/kg.
Dopamine D3 receptor-mediated mitogenesis in
vitro.
Quinpirole (10 nM) stimulated [3H]thymidine
incorporation, a measure of mitogenesis, in NG108-15 cells stably
transfected with the human D3 dopamine receptor, to
171.9 ± 5.0% of controls (100.0 ± 4.6%; n = 3; P < .01). Although amisulpride (100 nM) failed to stimulate
[3H]thymidine incorporation (95.8 ± 7.1%;
n = 3; P > .05 vs. control), it
inhibited quinpirole-elicited [3H]thymidine incorporation
with an IC50 value of 22 ± 3 nM (n = 3).
Neurotransmitter release studies in vitro.
Dopamine
D2/D3 receptor antagonism can be demonstrated
in vitro by studying the modulation of neurotransmitter
release. Thus the electrically stimulated [3H]dopamine
release from slices of the striatum or the nucleus accumbens is subject
to inhibitory modulation through a D2-like (D2/D3) terminal autoreceptor and is inhibited
by the D2/D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT with
EC50 values of 13.9 ± 0.7 and 4.7 ± 0.6 nM,
respectively. At maximally effective concentrations, 7-OH-DPAT reduces
the evoked release to 3.7% and 13.8% of controls in the striatum and
nucleus accumbens, respectively.
The effects of amisulpride were studied alone and against a
concentration of 7-OH-DPAT that produces approximately 70% of its
maximal inhibitory effect on evoked [3H]dopamine overflow
(30 nM in the striatum, 10 nM in the nucleus accumbens). Amisulpride
slightly but significantly increased [3H]dopamine release
from slices of the rat striatum (S2/S1 = 0.88 ± 0.04 under control conditions, n = 6;
1.04 ± 0.08 in the presence of 100 nM amisulpride,
n = 4; P < .05) and opposed the inhibitory effects of 7-OH-DPAT in both brain areas (fig. 3).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of amisulpride on electrically evoked
[3H]dopamine release from the rat striatum and nucleus
accumbens in vitro. The effect of amisulpride on
electrically evoked [3H]dopamine release was studied
using slices prepared from the rat striatum and nucleus accumbens.
Slices were initially stimulated electrically (2 min, 3 Hz, 16 mA) in
the absence of amisulpride or 7-OH-DPAT and, 40 min thereafter, in
their presence. Amisulpride or 7-OH-DPAT (30 nM for the striatum, 10 nM
for the nucleus accumbens) was added to the superfusion buffer 20 min
before the second stimulation period. When the interaction between
amisulpride and 7-OH-DPAT was studied, amisulpride was present in the
superfusion buffer as of 20 min before the first stimulation period. In
each case, the stimulation-evoked [3H]-overflow
(S1 and S2, respectively) was calculated with
respect to the spontaneous outflow in the fractions immediately before stimulation (sp1 and sp2, respectively). Data
are shown as the mean and S.E.M. of 3 to 11 observations. * and :
P < .05 compared with control and 7-OH-DPAT, respectively.
|
|
Electrically stimulated [14C]ACh (formed after
preincubation with [14C]choline) release from slices of
the rat striatum is inhibited through the stimulation of a postsynaptic
D2 receptor (Arbilla and Langer, 1984
). The dopamine
D2/D3 agonist 7-OH-DPAT inhibited electrical
stimulation-evoked [14C]ACh release from rat striatal
slices with an IC50 value of 19.5 ± 4.7 nM to a
maximum of 23% of control values. Amisulpride opposed the effects of
7-OH-DPAT, thus attesting to postsynaptic dopamine receptor blockade.
Amisulpride concentration-response curves against the effects of 30 nM
7-OH-DPAT on [3H]dopamine release (EC50 = 2.2 ± 0.3 nM) and [14C]ACh (EC50 = 1.2 ± 0.3 nM) release are compared in figure 4. Amisulpride did not affect basal [3H]dopamine or
[14C]ACh efflux at any concentration tested (data not
shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of amisulpride on electrically evoked
[3H]dopamine and [14C]ACh release from the
rat striatum in vitro. The effects of amisulpride ( ) on
the 7-OH-DPAT (30 nM)-induced ( ) inhibition of electrically evoked
[3H]dopamine and [14C]ACh release were
studied using slices prepared from the rat striatum. Data are shown as
a percentage of the corresponding S2/S1 control
( ) ratio ([3H]dopamine: 0.92 ± 0.02, n = 32; [14C]ACh: 0.90 ± 0.01, n = 37).
|
|
Effects on dopaminergic neurotransmission in vivo.
Tissue dopamine and DOPAC levels. The effects of
amisulpride, haloperidol, sulpiride and clozapine on regional dopamine
and DOPAC tissue levels are shown in table 4. The doses
of the latter three reference compounds were chosen as those previously
shown to have maximal effects on dopamine turnover in the striatum
(Scatton et al., 1977
).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4
Effects of amisulpride on dopamine and DOPAC levels in the rat brain
Animals were sacrificed 120 min after injection of drugs, and tissue
levels of dopamine and DOPAC were determined by HPLC with
electrochemical detection. Data are the mean and S.E.M. of 12 animals
for each experimental group and are presented as absolute levels and
(in parentheses) as a percentage of the corresponding control value.
|
|
Only the highest dose of amisulpride (100 mg/kg) significantly reduced
dopamine levels in the striatum or limbic system. No other neuroleptic
significantly decreased dopamine levels in the striatum at the doses
used. Sulpiride significantly decreased limbic dopamine levels by
approximately 10%.
Amisulpride increased tissue DOPAC levels in a dose-dependent manner in
all brain regions. This effect was significant (P < .05) from 2.5 to 100 mg/kg in the limbic system and from 10 to 100 mg/kg in the
striatum. Apart from this difference in threshold sensitivity, no
differences in the potency of amisulpride were observed between the two
regions studied. The maximal effects of amisulpride (100 mg/kg) were
similar in the limbic system and striatum (319% and 285% of controls,
respectively).
Haloperidol significantly increased tissue DOPAC levels in both regions
(P < .001). At the dose tested, its effects were more marked in
the striatum (344%) than in the limbic (265%) system. The effects of
sulpiride, like those of amisulpride, were of a similar order of
magnitude in each region (striatum = 290%, limbic = 272%).
Clozapine had a relatively minor effect on striatal (159%) and limbic
(174%) tissue DOPAC levels.
Dopamine synthesis. The effects of amisulpride on tyrosine
hydroxylase activity, the rate-limiting step in dopamine synthesis that
is subject to negative-feedback modulation through dopamine autoreceptors (Claustre et al., 1985
; Walters and Roth,
1976
), were specifically addressed after inhibition of L-dopa
decarboxylase by pretreatment with NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg).
Amisulpride significantly increased the synthesis of dopamine, as
measured by the accumulation of dopa, in the rat striatum and limbic
system at doses of 20 and 100 mg/kg (table 5). It shows
a relative selectivity for the limbic system (ED50 = 18.6 ± 4.7 mg/kg) as compared with the striatum (ED50 = 43.7 ± 6.5 mg/kg). At the dose of 100 mg/kg, its maximal
effects appear similar to those of haloperidol (0.3 mg/kg, table 5).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5
Effects of amisulpride on dopamine synthesis in the rat brain
Rats received NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg) 90 min after the administration
of amisulpride or its vehicle control and were sacrificed 30 min
thereafter. Data are expressed as the mean and S.E.M.
(n = 3-7/group). Dopa levels calculated as a
percentage of the corresponding control groups are shown in
parentheses.
|
|
In order to isolate presynaptic regulatory mechanisms,
pharmacologically, animals were additionally pretreated with
-hydroxy-butyrate to block neuronal impulse flow (Claustre et
al., 1985
). Under these conditions, dopa accumulation is increased
to approximately 210% and 115% of controls in the striatum and limbic
system, respectively. Amisulpride (0.5-75 mg/kg, table
6) fails to provoke an additional increase in dopa
accumulation in the striatum but slightly accelerates, at 75 mg/kg,
dopamine synthesis in the limbic system. In both brain regions,
haloperidol modestly but significantly stimulates the accumulation of
dopa.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 6
Effects of amisulpride on dopamine synthesis in the rat brain after
blockade of impulse flow
Rats received NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg) 90 min after the administration of
amisulpride or its vehicle control and were sacrificed 30 min
thereafter. -Hydroxy-butyric acid was administered 45 min before
sacrifice. Because the data for amisulpride derive from multiple
experiments, they are expressed as a percentage of the control value
for each experiment. Mean control dopa levels varied from 1038 ± 80 to 1451 ± 86 and from 592 ± 19 to 710 ± 33 ng/g
wet tissue weight for the striatum and limbic system, respectively, in
the case of amisulpride. In the case of haloperidol, control dopa
levels were 1038 ± 80 and 619 ± 30 ng/g wet tissue weight
for the striatum and limbic system, respectively. Shown are the mean
and S.E.M. (n = 3-7/group).
|
|
Activation of terminal dopamine autoreceptors by the administration of
7-OH-DPAT (0.082 mg/kg s.c.) to
-hydroxy-butyrate-pretreated animals
results in a decrease in dopa accumulation in both regions (table
7). Amisulpride opposes the effects of 7-OH-DPAT with ED50 values of 10.6 ± 5.2 and 10.4 ± 6.4 mg/kg in
the striatum and limbic system, respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 7
Effects of 7-OH-DPAT and amisulpride on dopamine synthesis in the rat
brain after blockade of impulse flow
Rats received NSD-1015 (100 mg/kg) 90 min after the administration of
amisulpride or its vehicle control and were sacrificed 30 min
thereafter. -Hydroxy-butyric acid was administered 45 min before
sacrifice. Data are expressed as the mean and S.E.M. (n = 3-7/group). Dopa levels calculated as a percentage of the corresponding control groups are shown in parentheses.
|
|
Effects on extracellular dopamine and DOPAC as measured by
microdialysis. In comparison with vehicle-treated controls,
amisulpride (10 mg/kg) increases extracellular dopamine levels,
measured by the technique of microdialysis coupled to online HPLC with
electrochemical detection, in both the striatum and nucleus accumbens
(fig. 5). Maximal levels, approximately 150% of
controls, are reached within 60 min of drug administration.
Amisulpride, administered at the dose of 30 mg/kg, produced similar
effects (data not shown). A concomitant but slightly delayed increase
in extracellular DOPAC levels in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens
reached, 140 min after drug administration, 137 ± 7% and
200 ± 22%, respectively. The effect of amisulpride on dialysate
DOPAC levels appeared greater in the nucleus accumbens than in the
striatum.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of amisulpride on extracellular dopamine and
DOPAC levels, as measured by microdialysis, in the rat striatum and
nucleus accumbens. Extracellular dopamine and DOPAC levels in the rat striatum (n = 4) and nucleus accumbens
(n = 6) were measured after the administration of
amisulpride (10 mg/kg i.p.), using the microdialysis technique.
Dialysates were collected as 20-min fractions and analyzed by online
HPLC coupled to electrochemical detection. Data are shown as a
percentage of basal outflow, taken over five stable fractions
immediately before drug administration, and represent the mean and
S.E.M.
|
|
In comparison, the effects of haloperidol were studied at a dose (0.03 mg/kg) that yields an occupancy (21%-30%) of
[3H]raclopride-labeled D2-like receptors
in vivo similar to that produced by 10 mg/kg of amisulpride
(19%-37%). Compared with vehicle-treated controls, haloperidol
increased extracellular dopamine concentrations to 140% to 150% of
basal values in both brain regions (fig. 6). Like
amisulpride, haloperidol appeared to increase dialysate DOPAC levels to
a greater extent in the nucleus accumbens than in the striatum.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of haloperidol on extracellular dopamine and
DOPAC levels, as measured by microdialysis, in the rat striatum and
nucleus accumbens. Extracellular dopamine and DOPAC levels in the rat striatum (n = 6) and nucleus accumbens
(n = 6) were measured after the administration of
haloperidol (0.03 mg/kg i.p.), using the microdialysis technique.
Dialysates were collected as 20-min fractions and analyzed by on-line
HPLC coupled to electrochemical detection. Data are shown as a
percentage of basal outflow, taken over five stable fractions
immediately before drug administration, and represent the mean and
S.E.M.
|
|
Effects on stimulation-evoked dopamine release in the olfactory
tubercle. The administration of amisulpride (0.5-15 mg/kg s.c.)
provokes a time- and dose-dependent increase in the stimulation-evoked dopamine release, measured by differential pulse amperometry in the rat
olfactory tubercle (fig. 7). Its maximal effect,
obtained at a dose of 10 mg/kg, is similar to that previously seen
after haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg s.c.; Suaud-Chagny et al.,
1991
).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of amisulpride on the amplitude of evoked
dopamine release in the rat olfactory tubercle in vivo. The
effect of amisulpride was studied on dopamine release evoked by
electrical stimulations of the ascending dopaminergic pathway, which
were repeated every 10 min. Dopamine release was measured using an
electrochemically treated carbon-fiber electrode implanted in the
olfactory tubercle and was recorded every 1 s. Data are expressed
as a percentage of the mean evoked dopamine release during the three
stimulations immediately before s.c. drug administration, and represent
the mean and S.E.M. of four (amisulpride) or six (vehicle) rats per group.
|
|
Evoked dopamine release at different doses of amisulpride, measured 90 min after drug administration and expressed as a percentage of
vehicle-treated controls, is shown in figure 8. The
ED50 value of amisulpride for its enhancement of
stimulation-evoked dopamine release may be estimated as 3.7 mg/kg s.c.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Dose-response curve of the effect of amisulpride on
stimulation-evoked dopamine release in the rat olfactory tubercle
in vivo. The effect of amisulpride, administered at the dose
of 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg s.c., on dopamine release was studied
as described in fig. 7. Shown is the effect, expressed as a percentage of the mean evoked dopamine release in vehicle-treated controls, of
amisulpride 90 min after drug treatment (mean ± S.E.M.;
n = 4/group).
|
|
Effects on striatal choline and ACh levels.
Amisulpride,
sulpiride, haloperidol and clozapine did not affect striatal choline
levels at the doses tested. Amisulpride decreased striatal ACh levels
significantly at 30 and 100 mg/kg (87.5% and 56.3% of control levels,
respectively). Haloperidol (2 mg/kg) and sulpiride (100 mg/kg)
decreased striatal ACh levels to a similar extent (68% and 62% of
controls, respectively), whereas clozapine (10 mg/kg) was without
significant effect (table 8).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 8
The effects of amisulpride, haloperidol, sulpiride and clozapine on rat
striatal ACh and choline levels
Animals were sacrificed 120 min after injection of drugs, and tissue
levels of ACh and choline were determined by HPLC with electrochemical
detection. Data are the mean and S.E.M. of six animals for each
experimental group.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The present studies indicate that amisulpride, in comparison with
other neuroleptics both typical and atypical, possesses complex
neurochemical characteristics and can largely be defined as a specific
dopamine receptor antagonist with a high degree of selectivity for the
D2 and D3 receptor subtypes that it recognizes in vitro with similar affinity. In vivo, these
properties translate into a degree of selectivity for the presynaptic
dopamine autoreceptors that control the dopaminergic system and for its
limbic projections.
Selectivity for the dopaminergic system.
The present data
confirm and extend previous reports (Chivers et al., 1988
)
in showing that amisulpride is highly selective for the D2
receptor family. Within this class of receptors, it recognizes the
cloned human and native D2 (rat) and D3
(bovine) subtypes with similar and low-nanomolar
(Ki = 3 nM) affinity in vitro. In
this respect, amisulpride is similar to drugs such as sulpiride, AJ76
and UH232 that show a D2/D3 affinity ratio
close to unity and is different from the classical neuroleptics, such as haloperidol, which generally show higher affinity for the
D2 than for the D3 receptor in vitro
(Sokoloff et al., 1990
, 1992a
). Previous studies have shown
that amisulpride recognizes the two isoforms of the human
D2 receptor (D2S and D2L) with
equal affinity (Malmberg et al., 1993
).
The mitogenic response to dopamine agonists of NG108-15 cells stably
transfected with human dopamine D3 receptor cDNA is one of
the few functional effects unequivocally associated with this receptor
subtype (Pilon et al., 1994
; Sautel et al.,
1995
). In this test, amisulpride inhibited the stimulation of
mitogenesis induced by quinpirole with a potency (IC50 = 22 nM) compatible with its affinity for the dopamine D3
receptor but failed to stimulate mitogenesis when added alone. Thus
amisulpride behaves as a full antagonist at the human dopamine
D3 receptor.
Like other neuroleptics of the benzamide structure, amisulpride does
not recognize the dopamine D4 receptor subtype (Van Tol et al., 1991
), subtypes of the D1 receptor
family (Sunahara et al., 1991
) or the plasma membrane
dopamine transporter.
Among the different 5-HT receptors studied, amisulpride recognizes only
the 5-HT2A subtype, albeit with low affinity
(IC50 = 2.0 µM). This observation agrees well with the
IC50 (5.6 µM) reported by Chivers et al.
(1988)
against the 5-HT2A receptor labeled using
[3H]ketanserin and with the observation that amisulpride
fails to inhibit the binding of [3H]spiperone to the
5-HT2A receptor of the rat frontal cortex in vivo (ID50 > 100 mg/kg). In this respect, amisulpride
thus differs from the majority of dopamine receptor antagonists,
i.e., neuroleptics, that often do possess high affinity for
this receptor (Meltzer et al., 1989
; Stockmeier et
al., 1993
). On the basis of an analysis of the affinity of
neuroleptics for the 5-HT2 receptor and their degree of
atypicity, Meltzer et al. (1989)
suggested that both properties are closely associated. Clearly, this conclusion does not
apply to amisulpride.
Drug affinity for muscarinic cholinergic and alpha-1
adrenergic receptors or
recognition sites has been suggested to
contribute to antipsychotic therapeutic activity or atypicity (Ferris
et al., 1991
; Meltzer, 1991
). Amisulpride fails to display
significant affinity (IC50 > 1 µM) for any of these
receptors, so they are not expected to contribute to its atypical
profile as a neuroleptic.
Amisulpride does not display significant activity against radioligand
binding to the alpha-2 adrenoceptor or the norepinephrine transporter, or to receptors involved in GABAergic or glutamatergic neurotransmission, the histamine H1 receptor, the
strychnine-sensitive glycine receptor, adenosine receptor subtypes, the
angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors, the
Na+ or L-type Ca++ channel, p-sites
(i.e., peripheral-type benzodiazepine) or I2 imidazoline recognition sites.
Thus, much like other neuroleptics derived from the benzamide
structure, such as sulpiride, remoxipride and raclopride (Chivers et al., 1988
; Leysen et al., 1993
), amisulpride
is highly selective for the dopamine D2 receptor family.
Within the D2 receptor family, amisulpride specifically
recognizes its D2 and D3 subtypes with high and
equal affinity in vitro. It seems reasonable to suggest that
its neuropharmacological and clinical profile would derive from these
characteristics.
Presynaptic dopamine autoreceptor selectivity.
As stated in
the Introduction, amisulpride, like most neuroleptics, antagonizes the
hyperactivity and stereotypies that result from the activation of
postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors by (high doses of) direct- or
indirect-acting dopaminomimetics such as apomorphine or amphetamine
(Perrault et al., 1997
). However, a characteristic feature
of amisulpride is that at lower doses, it potentiates apomorphine- and
amphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior (Vasse et al.,
1985
) and inhibits hypokinesia induced by the administration of low
(presynaptic) doses of apomorphine, 7-OH-DPAT or quinpirole (Perrault
et al., 1997
). The aim of the present study was to examine
whether the effects of low and high doses of amisulpride could be
neurochemically discriminated at the level of dopaminergic
neurotransmission.
The IC50 values of 7-OH-DPAT for inhibiting electrically
evoked [3H]dopamine and [14C]ACh release
from slices of the rat striatum in vitro are similar within
experimental limits. Similarly, the EC50 values of
amisulpride in opposing the effects of 7-OH-DPAT (30 nM) in this model
were indistinguishable (2.2 and 1.2 nM, respectively). Together, these observations suggest a close pharmacological similarity between these
populations of pre- and postsynaptic dopamine receptors. Gifford and
Johnson (1993)
, using quinpirole as the agonist in an otherwise similar
experimental approach, came to an identical conclusion using AJ-76 and
UH-232, dopamine antagonists for which a selectivity for the dopamine
autoreceptor has been amply demonstrated in vivo (Johansson
et al., 1985
; Svensson et al., 1986
; Waters et al., 1993a
, 1994
). Thus, for reasons that remain to be
explored, this in vitro model may not be fully
representative of in vivo drug effects.
As a second approach to characterizing the interaction of amisulpride
with presynaptic dopaminergic systems, we studied its effects on
extracellular dopamine levels, using the microdialysis technique
coupled to online HPLC analysis and electrochemical detection.
Amisulpride at low doses (10 mg/kg) increased dialysate dopamine levels
in both striatum and nucleus accumbens. Its effects at this dose were
similar to those of haloperidol at 0.03 mg/kg, a dose expected to yield
an occupancy of D2-like receptors in vivo
similar to that produced by amisulpride at 10 mg/kg.
The effects of amisulpride on terminal dopamine autoreceptors that
modulate impulse flow-dependent release in the rat olfactory tubercle
were studied by differential pulse amperometry in vivo. Because of the experimental design, where the impulse flow is imposed
by electrical stimulation of the ascending pathways, the modulation of
dopamine release as measured does not depend on postsynaptic or
somatodendritic autoreceptors but takes place at the terminal level
(Suaud-Chagny et al., 1991
). The design is thus different
from that in the microdialysis technique as employed, where
extracellular dopamine levels depend on the modulation of spontaneous
neuronal firing and dopamine release through somatodendritic as well as
terminal autoreceptors. Dopamine release evoked by electrical
stimulation of the ascending pathways was inhibited by the mixed
dopamine agonist apomorphine with an ED50 value of 70 µg/kg, as well as by the D2/D3 receptor
agonist quinpirole, whereas maximally effective doses of haloperidol
(0.5 mg/kg) and sulpiride (50 mg/kg) increased stimulation-evoked
dopamine release 4- to 5-fold (Suaud-Chagny et al., 1991
).
Amisulpride similarly increased the amplitude of dopamine release, its
maximal effect (a 5-fold increase) being observed at 10 mg/kg.
Amisulpride was approximately 3 times as active as sulpiride in this
respect and showed an ED50 value of 3.7 mg/kg. It should be
noted that the absolute potencies of both agonists (apomorphine) and
antagonists (amisulpride, haloperidol) are fully within the range for
behavioral effects thought to be mediated by presynaptic dopamine
autoreceptors (Perrault et al., 1997
), which further attests
to the validity of the model.
Thus it is clear that amisulpride behaves as an antagonist toward
presynaptic dopamine receptors that modulate [3H]dopamine
release in vitro as well as in vivo. At higher
doses, amisulpride possesses characteristics found in classical
neuroleptics. Thus amisulpride occupies postsynaptic
D2-like receptors in the rat striatum, labeled using
[3H]raclopride or [3H]spiperone
(ED50 = 44 and 87 mg/kg, respectively), and stimulates dopamine turnover, increasing tissue DOPAC levels with similar potency
and effectiveness in the striatum and limbic system. Its maximal
effects were similar to those of haloperidol and sulpiride and greater
than those of clozapine. Although striatal ACh levels were
significantly decreased only from 30 mg/kg amisulpride, inspection of
the relative overall dose-response curves for the effects of amisulpride on tissue DOPAC and ACh levels does not suggest any critical differences in potency. Both phenomena thus are likely to be
related.
In a result consistent with its stimulation of dopamine turnover,
amisulpride increased the rate of dopamine synthesis (ED50 = 20-40 mg/kg), as reflected by the increase in dopa accumulation after the administration of NSD-1015. It is also likely that in this
model, its effects were not mediated through presynaptic receptor
occupancy at the level of the dopamine nerve terminal because they were
largely eliminated by pretreatment with
-hydroxy-butyrate (table 6),
although we cannot rule out the possibility that low synaptic
concentrations of dopamine after impulse-flow blockade prevented
expression of a presynaptic component that might contribute under
control conditions. In contrast, haloperidol increased dopa accumulation in the absence as well as in the presence of
-hydroxy-butyrate, which suggests that its effects on dopamine
synthesis are mediated by postsynaptic (as evidenced in the absence of
-hydroxy-butyrate) as well as presynaptic (as evidenced in the
presence of
-hydroxy-butyrate) mechanisms.
7-OH-DPAT decreased the rate of dopa accumulation after pretreatment
with NSD-1015 and
-hydroxy-butyrate. Under those conditions where
impulse flow was interrupted, amisulpride opposed the effects of
7-OH-DPAT with an ED50 value of approximately 10 mg/kg. The fact that, particularly in the striatum, amisulpride failed to increase
dopa accumulation after NSD-1015 and
-hydroxy-butyrate pretreatment
yet opposed the effects of 7-OH-DPAT needs to be explored further. It
may be that synaptic concentrations of dopamine are too low after
blockade of neuronal activity to allow dopamine autoreceptor antagonism
to be expressed. A low endogenous DA tonus may similarly explain why
-hydroxy-butyrate administration caused only a small, nonsignificant
increase in dopa accumulation in the limbic system, even though the
effects of 7-OH-DPAT clearly demonstrated the presence of
synthesis-modulating DA autoreceptors in this area. Alternatively, the
modulation of dopamine synthesis by endogenous dopamine and the
exogenous agonist 7-OH-DPAT may be mediated at least in part through
different (extrajunctional?) dopamine receptor subtypes, differentially
recognized by amisulpride in vivo. Recent evidence suggests
that the molecularly defined D3 receptor might be a
candidate for this dopamine autoreceptor subtype (Meller et
al., 1993
; Nissbrandt et al., 1995
). Pharmacological studies in vitro (Aretha and Galloway, 1996
) and in
vivo (Aretha et al., 1995
) support this hypothesis. In
particular, the selective dopamine D3 receptor antagonist
(+)-S 14297 fails to affect dopamine synthesis in vivo, as
assessed by its effects on tissue DOPAC/dopamine ratios, when studied
alone, but opposes the inhibitory effects of 7-OH-DPAT on this
parameter (Gobert et al., 1995
).
Thus all available data suggest that, in vivo, amisulpride
affects presynaptic parameters of dopaminergic neurotransmission at
doses lower than those that block postsynaptic dopamine receptors. These data are in full agreement with the observations that amisulpride preferentially blocks behavioral effects thought to be associated with
the stimulation of presynaptic dopamine receptors (Perrault et
al., 1997
).
Selectivity for limbic D2/D3
receptors.
It has been suggested that the atypical character of
certain neuroleptics arises from a greater effect on the limbic system, which is thought to be involved in emotional and cognitive processes, than on the extrapyramidal system, which is intimately related to the
control of motor behavior (Bischoff, 1992
; Meltzer, 1993