![]() |
|
|
Vol. 297, Issue 1, 133-140, April 2001
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centre de Recherche
Pierre Fabre, Castres, France
Antipsychotic drugs comprise a wide range of structurally diverse
compounds and are considered to be antagonists at dopamine D2 receptors. High-resolution kinetic analyses of their
antagonist properties was performed by monitoring dynamic dopamine
(DA)-antagonist interactions at the recombinant human dopamine
D2short receptor. Time-dependent Ca2+ responses
were measured following activation of a chimeric
G
q/o protein in Chinese hamster
ovary-K1 cells. DA (10 µM) induced a rapid, high-magnitude
Ca2+ response (Tmax = 13.2 ± 0.7 s) followed by a low-magnitude phase, which
continued throughout the recorded time period (15 min). Of a large
series of putative DA antagonists, (+)-UH 232 and bromerguride demonstrated positive, DA-like intrinsic activity at the presumably unoccupied, DA-free receptor; the other antagonists being silent. Antagonists differed in terms of their abilities to prevent the high-magnitude Ca2+ phase in the antagonist-bound receptor
state, and to reverse the low-magnitude Ca2+ phase in the
DA-bound state. The benzamide derivatives tropapride and nemonapride
fully antagonized both the high- and low-magnitude Ca2+
response. Haloperidol, risperidone, and S 14066 also antagonized both
responses but with a maximal effect of only 62 to 79%. Although preventing the high-magnitude response (85-95%), the further putative antagonists (+)-butaclamol (6%), bromerguride (27%), and domperidone (41%) reversed the low-magnitude response only weakly and partially. These Ca2+ data indicate that putative DA antagonists act
differently, in particular, at the DA-bound D2short receptor.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Wurch, E. A. Boutet-Robinet, C. Palmier, F. C. Colpaert, and P. J. Pauwels Constitutive Coupling of a Chimeric Dopamine D2/alpha 1B Receptor to the Phospholipase C Pathway: Inverse Agonism to Silent Antagonism by Neuroleptic Drugs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2003; 304(1): 380 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||