![]() |
|
|
Vol. 296, Issue 3, 1035-1042, March 2001
College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
The limited penetration of paclitaxel into solid tumors may limit its
therapeutic efficacy. We recently showed a correlation between an
increase in interstitial space and an enhancement of drug delivery in
solid tumors. The present study evaluated whether this
observation can be used to develop a treatment strategy, where an
apoptosis-inducing pretreatment with paclitaxel is used to enhance its
own delivery to solid tumors. In histocultures of human pharynx FaDu
xenograft tumors, pretreatment with 1 µM nonradiolabeled paclitaxel,
which resulted in ~25% apoptosis and a 25% reduction in cell
density, enhanced the penetration rate of [3H]paclitaxel.
Likewise, dividing a total drug exposure to two treatments, separated
by an interval to allow apoptosis to occur, resulted in higher drug
penetration rate and accumulation compared with giving the same drug
exposure continuously. Similar results were obtained in rats bearing
subcutaneously implanted prostate MAT-LyLu tumors; fractionation of the
dose, to include 1) a pretreatment that yielded sufficient and
clinically relevant plasma concentration to induce apoptosis and 2) a
second dose given at an interval selected to allow apoptosis and
reduction in tumor cell density to occur, resulted in higher tumor
concentration compared with other treatments using the same total dose
but either did not include an apoptosis-inducing pretreatment or did
not allow for apoptosis to occur. We conclude that the pharmacological
effect of paclitaxel affects its own delivery to solid tumors and that modifications of the paclitaxel treatment schedule can enhance drug
delivery in solid tumors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Lu, M. Tsai, D. Lu, J. Wang, M. G. Wientjes, and J. L.-S. Au Tumor-Penetrating Microparticles for Intraperitoneal Therapy of Ovarian Cancer J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2008; 327(3): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Ackerman, D. Pawlowski, and K. D. Wittrup Effect of antigen turnover rate and expression level on antibody penetration into tumor spheroids Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2008; 7(7): 2233 - 2240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Tredan, C. M. Galmarini, K. Patel, and I. F. Tannock Drug Resistance and the Solid Tumor Microenvironment J Natl Cancer Inst, October 3, 2007; 99(19): 1441 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Lu, M. G. Wientjes, Z. Lu, and J. L.-S. Au Tumor Priming Enhances Delivery and Efficacy of Nanomedicines J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 80 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Grantab, S. Sivananthan, and I. F. Tannock The Penetration of Anticancer Drugs through Tumor Tissue as a Function of Cellular Adhesion and Packing Density of Tumor Cells Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1033 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||