![]() |
|
|
Vol. 295, Issue 3, 1127-1134, December 2000
Departments of Pharmacology (T.J.B., G.W., J.H.W.) and Psychology
(J.H.W.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Department
of Medicine (D.W.L., S.-X.D.), Columbia University, College of
Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
Recent reports have indicated the potential usefulness of
anticocaine catalytic monoclonal antibodies in reducing cocaine's toxic and reinforcing effects by altering its pharmacokinetics to favor
increased metabolism to the systemically inert products ecgonine
methylester and benzoic acid. The present study was designed to further
these findings by evaluating the hypothesis that administration of the
anticocaine catalytic monoclonal antibody mAb 15A10 would dose
and time dependently reduce behavior maintained by a range of doses of
i.v. cocaine. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in daily 8-h
sessions to self-administer i.v. cocaine. A within-session multiple-dose protocol was used wherein rats were allowed access to
saline or one of six doses of cocaine [0 (saline), 0.015, 0.03, 0.06, 0 (saline), 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg/injection] each hour in the
order stated. After demonstrating stable dose-response curves over 3 consecutive days, rats were given 30-min pretreatments of saline or mAb
15A10, (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg i.v.). Antibody, but not saline,
pretreatments significantly altered dose-response curves for cocaine
self-administration in a dose- and time-dependent manner, resulting in
downward and rightward shifts in rates of responding across the cocaine
dose range. These effects were apparently not attributable to general
behavioral suppression, because operant behavior for an alternative
reinforcer was not likewise affected. The present data extend previous
work indicating that pharmacokinetic approaches may be of worth in the
search for clinically effective cocaine antagonists.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. D. Cooper, Y. N.-T. Truong, Y.-G. Shi, and J. H. Woods Morphine Deprivation Increases Self-Administration of the Fast- and Short-Acting {micro}-Opioid Receptor Agonist Remifentanil in the Rat J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 920 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. D. Cooper, D. Narasimhan, R. K. Sunahara, P. Mierzejewski, E. M. Jutkiewicz, N. A. Larsen, I. A. Wilson, D. W. Landry, and J. H. Woods Rapid and Robust Protection against Cocaine-Induced Lethality in Rats by the Bacterial Cocaine Esterase Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1885 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pan, D. Gao, W. Yang, H. Cho, G. Yang, H.-H. Tai, and C.-G. Zhan Computational redesign of human butyrylcholinesterase for anticocaine medication PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16656 - 16661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. A. Carrera, G. F. Kaufmann, J. M. Mee, M. M. Meijler, G. F. Koob, and K. D. Janda From the Cover: Treating cocaine addiction with viruses PNAS, July 13, 2004; 101(28): 10416 - 10421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. McMillan, W. C. Hardwick, M. Li, M. G. Gunnell, F. I. Carroll, P. Abraham, and S. M. Owens Effects of Murine-Derived Anti-Methamphetamine Monoclonal Antibodies on (+)-Methamphetamine Self-Administration in the Rat J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2004; 309(3): 1248 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Jutkiewicz, E. B. Eller, J. E. Folk, K. C. Rice, J. R. Traynor, and J. H. Woods {delta}-Opioid Agonists: Differential Efficacy and Potency of SNC80, Its 3-OH (SNC86) and 3-Desoxy (SNC162) Derivatives in Sprague-Dawley Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 173 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sun, Y.-P. Pang, O. Lockridge, and S. Brimijoin Re-engineering Butyrylcholinesterase as a Cocaine Hydrolase Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 220 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Lau and L. Sun The Pharmacokinetic Determinants of the Frequency and Pattern of Intravenous Cocaine Self-administration in Rats by Pharmacokinetic Modeling Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2002; 30(3): 254 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||