JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sahin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sahin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, M.

Vol. 295, Issue 2, 836-843, November 2000

Evaluation of Route of Input on the Hepatic Disposition of Diazepam

Selma Sahin1 and Malcolm Rowland

Hacettepe University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara, Turkey (S.S.); School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (M.R.)

Diazepam, a drug of high intrinsic clearance, was studied in the in situ rat liver dually perfused with Krebs-bicarbonate buffer containing human serum albumin (HSA; 0-1%) and unlabeled diazepam (1 mg/l) under constant hepatic arterial (3 ml/min) and portal venous (PV; 12 ml/min) flow rates. Events after a unit impulse (using [14C]diazepam) and at steady state (using unlabeled diazepam) were evaluated. In the absence of HSA the fractional effluent recovery (F) after hepatic arterial infusion (0.046 ± 0.013) was about twice that after PV infusion (0.019 ± 0.006). With HSA present, regardless of input route, F increased as unbound diazepam fraction in perfusate decreased (e.g., for PV, F = 0.58 ± 0.05 and 0.69 ± 0.02 for unbound diazepam fraction values of 0.18 ± 0.01 and 0.037 ± 0.01 at 0.25% and 1% HSA). The effluent [14C]diazepam profile was also dependent upon HSA. On decreasing HSA from 1 to 0.25% the early sharp peak (at 12-20 s) was replaced by a flatter unimodal profile with a later peak (at 60-80 s). Comparison of estimated effective permeability-surface area product to perfusate flow ratios (4.4 for 1% HSA and 21 for 0.25% HSA) indicated a shift from a perfusion rate-limited uptake with 0.25% HSA to one intermediate between permeability and perfusion at 1% HSA. Recognizing that orally absorbed drug enters the liver only via PV and i.v. drug via both vascular routes, this study emphasizes the difference in hepatic extraction of compounds depending on route of input, and the role that alteration in perfusate binding has on hepatic drug disposition.


1 S.S. thanks the Turkish Government for a studentship.


0022-3565/00/2952-0836$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Sahin and M. Rowland
Application of the Dispersion Model to Describe Disposition Kinetics of Markers in the Dual Perfused Rat Liver
Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2007; 35(7): 1119 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.