![]() |
|
|
Vol. 295, Issue 1, 51-57, October 2000
Chemistry (M.R.G., D.M., S.L.D.) and Medical (M.F., N.D.V., A.G.,
S.J.G., P.E.M.) Departments, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New
York; and Psychiatry Department, New York University School of
Medicine, New York, New York (S.L.D.)
The therapeutic and stimulant properties of methylphenidate (MP), a
drug commonly prescribed for the treatment of attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder, have been attributed to increases in synaptic
dopamine (DA) concentrations resulting from the blockade of DA
transporters. In addition to obvious difficulties inherent in any
interspecies comparison, interpretation of preclinical studies done
with MP is further complicated by different routes of administration in
animals (i.v. and i.p.) compared with humans (oral). In the present
study we compared the effects of i.p. and intragastric (oral) MP both
on rat nucleus accumbens DA assessed by in vivo microdialysis and on
locomotor activity measured in a photocell apparatus. We also compared
regional brain uptake and plasma levels of [3H]MP after
administration of 5 mg/kg via both routes. Intraperitoneal MP (5 and 10 mg/kg) was approximately twice as potent as intragastric MP in terms of
increasing extracellular DA levels and in stimulating locomotion. This
was consistent with the higher brain uptake of [3H]MP
when given i.p. rather than intragastrically. The dose of 2 mg/kg
produced significant increases in both measurements when administered
i.p., but not intragastrically. This study shows that relatively low
doses of MP (2 mg i.p. and 5 mg intragastric) significantly increase
extracellular DA and locomotor activity and indicates that the
differences in the neurochemical and behavioral effects of MP between
the intragastric and the i.p. routes are due to central drug bioavailability.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Cassaday, B. Finger, and R. Horsley Methylphenidate and nicotine focus responding to an informative discrete CS over successive sessions of appetitive conditioning J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2008; 22(8): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Gray, M. Punsoni, N. E. Tabori, J. T. Melton, V. Fanslow, M. J. Ward, B. Zupan, D. Menzer, J. Rice, C. T. Drake, et al. Methylphenidate Administration to Juvenile Rats Alters Brain Areas Involved in Cognition, Motivated Behaviors, Appetite, and Stress J. Neurosci., July 4, 2007; 27(27): 7196 - 7207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Drouin, M. Page, and B. Waterhouse Methylphenidate Enhances Noradrenergic Transmission and Suppresses Mid- and Long-Latency Sensory Responses in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex of Awake Rats J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 622 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Patel, D. J. Rademacher, and C. J. Hillard Differential Regulation of the Endocannabinoids Anandamide and 2-Arachidonylglycerol within the Limbic Forebrain by Dopamine Receptor Activity J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2003; 306(3): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Wilens, S. V. Faraone, J. Biederman, and S. Gunawardene Does Stimulant Therapy of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Beget Later Substance Abuse? A Meta-analytic Review of the Literature Pediatrics, January 1, 2003; 111(1): 179 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuczenski and D. S. Segal Exposure of Adolescent Rats to Oral Methylphenidate: Preferential Effects on Extracellular Norepinephrine and Absence of Sensitization and Cross-Sensitization to Methamphetamine J. Neurosci., August 15, 2002; 22(16): 7264 - 7271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Volkow, G.-J. Wang, J. S. Fowler, J. Logan, M. Gerasimov, L. Maynard, Y.-S. Ding, S. J. Gatley, A. Gifford, and D. Franceschi Therapeutic Doses of Oral Methylphenidate Significantly Increase Extracellular Dopamine in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., January 15, 2001; 21(2): RC121 - RC121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||