![]() |
|
|
Vol. 294, Issue 1, 347-355, July 2000
Departments of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine,
Stanford, CA (C.J.J.G.B, J.P.W.V, J.W.M., J.-P.T.); and Pharmacology,
Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden,
the Netherlands (C.J.J.G.B.)
The pharmacodynamic (PD) interaction between the benzodiazepine agonist
midazolam and the
2-adrenergic agonist
dexmedetomidine was characterized for defined measures of anesthetic
action and cardiovascular and ventilatory side effects in 33 rats. For
various combinations of constant plasma concentrations of midazolam
(0.1-20 µg/ml) and dexmedetomidine (0.3-19 ng/ml) obtained by
target-controlled infusion, the whisker reflex (WR), righting reflex
(RR), startle reflex to noise (SR), tail clamp response (TC), and
corneal reflex (CR) were assessed. EEG (power in 0.5-3.5-Hz frequency
band), mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded
continuously. Blood gas values and arterial drug concentrations were
determined regularly. The nature and extent of PD interaction was
quantified by the model parameter synergy (SYN < 0, antagonism; SYN = 0, additivity; and
SYN > 0, synergy). With increasing drug
concentrations WR was lost first, followed by RR, SR, TC, and CR. These
effects were accompanied by an increase of the EEG measure. The drug
interaction was synergistic for all stimulus-response measures and the
degree of synergy increased with deeper levels of central nervous
system depression (SYN was 7.3, 145, 560, 374, and 1490 for WR, RR, SR, TC, and CR, respectively). The cardiovascular side
effects of dexmedetomidine, evaluated at similar PD endpoints, were
reduced in the presence of midazolam. Ventilatory side effects were
minor for all drug combinations. The nature and extent of the PD
interactions were not reflected in the EEG measure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. A. Hendrickx, E. I. Eger II, J. M. Sonner, and S. L. Shafer Is Synergy the Rule? A Review of Anesthetic Interactions Producing Hypnosis and Immobility Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 494 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Johnson, N. D. Syroid, D. K. Gupta, S. C. Manyam, T. D. Egan, J. Huntington, J. L. White, D. Tyler, and D. R. Westenskow An Evaluation of Remifentanil Propofol Response Surfaces for Loss of Responsiveness, Loss of Response to Surrogates of Painful Stimuli and Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 471 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Van Sassenbroeck, P. De Paepe, F. M. Belpaire, and W. A. Buylaert Characterization of the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate and Ethanol in the Rat Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2003; 73(2): 270 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||