![]() |
|
|
Vol. 291, Issue 3, 1257-1268, December 1999
Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of
Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
In this study we assessed the discriminative stimulus, self-reported,
and performance effects of flumazenil in humans. The first group
(n = 6) was trained to discriminate flumazenil (0.56 mg/70 kg i.v.) from saline and tested with flumazenil (0.10, 0.32, 0.56, and 1.0 mg/70 kg) under a two-response drug discrimination procedure. The second group (n = 8) was trained to
discriminate flumazenil (0.56 mg/70 kg i.v.) from saline and tested
with flumazenil (0.32, 0.56, and 1.0 mg/70 kg), midazolam (0.10, 0.56, and 1.0 mg/70 kg), and caffeine (75 mg/70 kg) under a novel-response
drug discrimination procedure. In both groups, flumazenil was acquired and maintained as a discriminative stimulus. Flumazenil
dose-dependently increased flumazenil-appropriate responding and
ratings of strength of drug effect and sedation, and decreased ratings
of stimulant effects and psychomotor performance. Under the
novel-response procedure, midazolam produced dose-dependent increases
in flumazenil-appropriate responding. However, midazolam produced 43 and 25% novel responding at the intermediate and highest test doses,
respectively. Midazolam dose-dependently increased ratings of strength
of drug effect and sedation, and decreased ratings of stimulant effects
and psychomotor performance. The magnitude of effects on ratings of
strength of drug effect and sedation were comparable after flumazenil
and midazolam, but psychomotor performance effects were greater after midazolam than after flumazenil. Caffeine produced mostly
saline-appropriate responding. The results indicate that flumazenil has
agonist effects similar to those of midazolam; however, novel
responding after midazolam, and the greater performance decrement after
midazolam, suggest that flumazenil does not act as a traditional
benzodiazepine agonist.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. V. Tcheremissine, S. D. Lane, L. M. Lieving, H. M. Rhoades, S. Nouvion, and D. R. Cherek Individual differences in aggressive responding to intravenous flumazenil administration in adult male parolees J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2005; 19(6): 640 - 646. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Kelly, W. W. Stoops, A. S. Perry, M. A. Prendergast, and C. R. Rush Clinical Neuropharmacology of Drugs of Abuse: A Comparison of Drug-Discrimination and Subject-Report Measures Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 227 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||