Vol. 286, Issue 2, 742-752, August 1998

Holtzman and Harlan Sprague-Dawley Rats: Differences in DRL 72-Sec Performance and 8-Hydroxy-Di-Propylamino Tetralin-Induced Hypothermia¹

Mercedes Balcells-Olivero, Michael S. Cousins and Lewis S. Seiden

The University of Chicago, Department of Pharmacological and Physiological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois

Several compounds were tested on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate 72-sec (DRL 72-sec) schedule, a behavioral screen to determine putative antidepressants; these compounds were evaluated in two outbred stocks of rats, Harlan and Holtzman Sprague-Dawley rats. A dose-response determination for the tricyclic antidepressants, imipramine and desipramine, the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserin, the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, (±)8-hydroxy-di-propylamino tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and the dopamine releasing compound, amphetamine, were assessed in both rat stocks. The two stocks of rats differed in their baseline performance on the DRL 72-sec schedule. The Harlan rats had a higher reinforcement rate and a lower response rate than the Holtzman rats. In Holtzman, but not in Harlan rats, imipramine, ketanserin, fluoxetine and 8-OH-DPAT increased reinforcement rate and decreased response rate on the DRL 72-sec schedule, confirming previous studies. However, desipramine was the only drug to increase reinforcement rate and decrease response rate in both Holtzman and Harlan rats; in Harlan rats, drugs that primarily act upon the 5-HT system, imipramine, ketanserin, fluoxetine and 8-OH-DPAT, disrupted the DRL 72-sec performance and did not increase the number of reinforcements over baseline as was seen in Holtzman rats. Amphetamine disrupted DRL 72-sec performance in both Holtzman and Harlan rats in a similar manner. The hypothermic response to 8-OH-DPAT was also assessed in the two stocks of rats; Holtzman rats had a smaller decrease in core body temperature than Harlan rats. The observed behavioral and pharmacological differences between Holtzman and Harlan rat stocks may be genetically and/or environmentally mediated.