![]() |
|
|
Vol. 285, Issue 3, 1310-1316, June 1998
Interdepartmental Neuroscience Ph.D. Program (M.F.O.) and
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (M.F.O., N.T.M.),
Neuropsychiatric Institute (M.F.O., N.T.M.) and
Brain Research
Institute (M.F.O., N.T.M.), University of California at Los Angeles,
Los Angeles, California
The globus pallidus and ventral pallidum receive dense
enkephalinergic innervation from the dorsal and ventral striatum,
respectively. A previous study demonstrated peripheral morphine
administration to increase pallidal enkephalin release. To determine
whether such opioid stimulatory effects may be mediated directly in the pallidum, in vivo microdialysis was used to study the
effects of local administration of several concentrations of the
mu receptor agonists morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide
(M6G) as well as the the delta receptor agonist SNC80 on
pallidal enkephalin release in freely moving rats. Low concentrations
of morphine or M6G (1-10 nM) enhanced the release of enkephalins, an
effect that was reversed by coadministration of the mu
receptor antagonist
-funaltrexamine (
-FNA). A similar stimulatory
effect was observed with a low concentration of SNC80 (50 nM), an
effect that was blocked by the delta antagonist
naltrindole (NTD). High concentrations of morphine (100 nM to 100 µM)
had little or no effect, whereas M6G (10 µM) suppressed enkephalin
release, an effect that was reversed by
-FNA. Similarly, a high
concentration (5 µM) of SNC80 suppressed enkephalin release. However,
this effect was not blocked by NTD but was attenuated by
-FNA,
suggesting a mu receptor-mediated action. These results
offer in vivo evidence of bimodal
(i.e., stimulatory and inhibitory)
effects of mu and delta opioid agonists on enkephalin release in the pallidum.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Zaki, D. E. Keith Jr., G. A. Brine, F. I. Carroll, and C. J. Evans Ligand-Induced Changes in Surface {micro}-Opioid Receptor Number: Relationship to G Protein Activation? J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2000; 292(3): 1127 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||