![]() |
|
|
Vol. 285, Issue 3, 1181-1186, June 1998
Geraldine Brush Cancer Research Institute, California Pacific
Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California
Although the mu selective agonist
[D-Ala2-MePhe4-Gly-ol5]enkephalin
(DAMGO) and the delta selective agonist
[D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin
(DPDPE) are both antinociceptive when administered directly into the
spinal cord of mice, 50% of antinociceptive dose (AD50) of
DAMGO is about 2 orders of magnitude lower than the AD50 of
DPDPE. In contrast, the two ligands show similar affinities for their
respective receptors in in vitro binding assays. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that DPDPE antinociception in the spinal cord is mediated through not delta but
mu receptors, for which it has an several hundred-fold
lower affinity than DAMGO. In support of this, we found that
DPDPE-mediated antinociception was blocked by the mu
selective antagonist
D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTAP). The pA2 value of CTAP for DPDPE was virtually
identical with that for DAMGO. However, because its action also was
blocked by naltrindole, an antagonist selective for
delta receptors, the latter must also play a role in
antinociception. When DAMGO and DPDPE were administered i.t. together
at ratios ranging from 1:200 to 1:500, the AD50 of DAMGO
was lowered as much as 10-fold relative to its AD50 when
given alone. Thus DPDPE had a potentiating effect on DAMGO, although
the reverse was not observed. This potentiation was lost in animals
made tolerant to systemic morphine. The loss of potentiation seemed to
be caused by changes in the delta receptors, because a)
the AD50 of DAMGO (i.t.) given alone to tolerant animals was virtually the same as for naive animals, whereas the
AD50 of DPDPE given alone increased by 4-fold; and b) the
AD50 of DPDPE given alone in the tolerant animal was
increased only slightly by naltrindole, whereas CTAP was still a very
potent antagonist. We conclude that DPDPE, a selective
delta agonist, mediates antinociception in the spinal
cord through mu receptors, consistent with results of
recent studies of "knock-out" mice lacking mu
receptors. At the same time, however, the delta agonist
acting through delta receptors can potentiate the
mu receptor-mediated antinociceptive action of either
mu or delta agonists. This potentiating
effect, like the synergistic effect observed between mu
receptors at spinal and supraspinal sites, is lost during tolerance.