JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burnstock, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burnstock, G.

Vol. 285, Issue 3, 1005-1011, June 1998

Antagonism of an Adenosine/ATP Receptor in Follicular Xenopus Oocytes1

B. F. King, S. S. Wildman, A. Townsend-Nicholson and G. Burnstock

Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, England2

Follicular Xenopus oocytes possess a novel receptor where both adenosine and ATP activate a cAMP-dependent, nonrectifying K+-current. Five compounds, alpha ,beta -methylene ATP (alpha ,beta -meATP), 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT), theophylline, 2,2'-pyridylisatogen tosylate (PIT) and suramin, were tested as antagonists of adenosine- and ATP-activated K+-currents. The descending order of activity (pIC50 values) against adenosine responses was: alpha ,beta -meATP (6.72) = 8-SPT (6.68) > theophylline (5.32) > PIT (4.58), whereas suramin was relatively inactive. The blocking actions of alpha ,beta -meATP and alkylxanthine compounds were reversible with washout, whereas blockade by PIT was irreversible. These antagonists showed similar blocking activity against ATP responses, except for PIT which was more effective at ATP responses than at adenosine responses. The selectivity of antagonists was tested against cAMP-dependent K+-currents evoked by forskolin and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). 8-SPT and theophylline did not inhibit but instead augmented forskolin and FSH responses; this augmentation may be caused by inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity inside follicle cells. On the other hand, alpha ,beta -MeATP and PIT inhibited forskolin and FSH responses; both compounds apparently are nonselective antagonists. Thus, only alkylxanthine derivatives (8-SPT and theophylline) were selective antagonists of the novel adenosine/ATP receptor in Xenopus oocytes, whereas alpha ,beta -meATP and PIT were nonselective in their blocking actions and suramin was relatively inactive.


0022-3565/98/2853-1005$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.