![]() |
|
|
Vol. 285, Issue 2, 651-658, May 1998
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of
Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
The cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, are members of the G-protein
coupled receptor family and share many of this family's structural
features. A highly conserved aspartic acid residue in the second
transmembrane domain of G-protein coupled receptors has been shown for
many of these receptors to be functionally important for agonist
binding and/or G-protein coupling. To determine whether this residue is
involved in cannabinoid receptor function, we used site-directed
mutagenesis of receptor cDNA followed by expression of the mutant
receptor in HEK 293 cells. Aspartate 163 (in CB1) and aspartate 80 (in
CB2) were substituted with either asparagine or glutamate. Stably
transfected cell lines were tested for radioligand binding and
inhibition of cAMP accumulation. Binding of the cannabinoid receptor
agonist [3H]CP-55,940 was not affected by either mutation
in either the CB1 or CB2 receptor, nor were the affinities of
anandamide or (
)-
9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Binding of
the CB1-selective receptor antagonist SR141716A also was unaltered.
However, the affinity of WIN 55,212-2 was attenuated significantly in
the CB1, but not the CB2, mutant receptors. Studies examining
inhibition of cAMP accumulation showed reduced effects of cannabinoid
agonists in the mutated receptors. Our data suggest that this aspartate
residue is not generally important for ligand recognition in the
cannabinoid receptors; however, it is required for communication with G
proteins and signal transduction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. R. Ross, I. Napier, and M. Connor Inhibition of Recombinant Human T-type Calcium Channels by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2008; 283(23): 16124 - 16134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Canals and G. Milligan Constitutive Activity of the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Regulates the Function of Co-expressed Mu Opioid Receptors J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11424 - 11434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kapur, P. Samaniego, G. A. Thakur, A. Makriyannis, and M. E. Abood Mapping the Structural Requirements in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Transmembrane Helix II for Signal Transduction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Anavi-Goffer, D. Fleischer, D. P. Hurst, D. L. Lynch, J. Barnett-Norris, S. Shi, D. L. Lewis, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. C. Howlett, P. H. Reggio, et al. Helix 8 Leu in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Contributes to Selective Signal Transduction Mechanisms J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 25100 - 25113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Picone, A. D. Khanolkar, W. Xu, L. A. Ayotte, G. A. Thakur, D. P. Hurst, M. E. Abood, P. H. Reggio, D. J. Fournier, and A. Makriyannis (-)-7'-Isothiocyanato-11-hydroxy-1',1'-dimethylheptylhexahydrocannabinol (AM841), a High-Affinity Electrophilic Ligand, Interacts Covalently with a Cysteine in Helix Six and Activates the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1623 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, N. M. Nowak, S.-K. Kim, K. A. Jacobson, A. Bagheri, C. Schmidt, and J. Wess Random Mutagenesis of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Expressed in Yeast: IDENTIFICATION OF SECOND-SITE MUTATIONS THAT RESTORE FUNCTION TO A COUPLING-DEFICIENT MUTANT M3 RECEPTOR J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5664 - 5675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Howlett, F. Barth, T. I. Bonner, G. Cabral, P. Casellas, W. A. Devane, C. C. Felder, M. Herkenham, K. Mackie, B. R. Martin, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 161 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nie and D. L. Lewis Structural Domains of the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor That Contribute to Constitutive Activity and G-Protein Sequestration J. Neurosci., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 8758 - 8764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Soderstrom and F. Johnson Zebra Finch CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor: Pharmacology and in Vivo and in Vitro Effects of Activation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2001; 297(1): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Klein, B. Lane, C. A. Newton, and H. Friedman The Cannabinoid System and Cytokine Network Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2000; 225(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Griffin, Q. Tao, and M. E. Abood Cloning and Pharmacological Characterization of the Rat CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2000; 292(3): 886 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. McAllister, G. Griffin, L. S. Satin, and M. E. Abood Cannabinoid Receptors Can Activate and Inhibit G Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels in a Xenopus Oocyte Expression System J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 1999; 291(2): 618 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Roche, S. Bounds, S. Brown, and K. Mackie A Mutation in the Second Transmembrane Region of the CB1 Receptor Selectively Disrupts G Protein Signaling and Prevents Receptor Internalization Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 1999; 56(3): 611 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Tao, S. D. McAllister, J. Andreassi, K. W. Nowell, G. A. Cabral, D. P. Hurst, K. Bachtel, M. C. Ekman, P. H. Reggio, and M. E. Abood Role of a Conserved Lysine Residue in the Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor (CB2): Evidence for Subtype Specificity Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 1999; 55(3): 605 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. De Petrocellis, T. Bisogno, M. Maccarrone, J. B. Davis, A. Finazzi-Agro, and V. Di Marzo The Activity of Anandamide at Vanilloid VR1 Receptors Requires Facilitated Transport across the Cell Membrane and Is Limited by Intracellular Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 12856 - 12863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||