JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Abood, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tao, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Abood, M. E.

Vol. 285, Issue 2, 651-658, May 1998

Mutation of a Highly Conserved Aspartate Residue in the Second Transmembrane Domain of the Cannabinoid Receptors, CB1 and CB2, Disrupts G-Protein Coupling1

Qing Tao and Mary E. Abood

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

The cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, are members of the G-protein coupled receptor family and share many of this family's structural features. A highly conserved aspartic acid residue in the second transmembrane domain of G-protein coupled receptors has been shown for many of these receptors to be functionally important for agonist binding and/or G-protein coupling. To determine whether this residue is involved in cannabinoid receptor function, we used site-directed mutagenesis of receptor cDNA followed by expression of the mutant receptor in HEK 293 cells. Aspartate 163 (in CB1) and aspartate 80 (in CB2) were substituted with either asparagine or glutamate. Stably transfected cell lines were tested for radioligand binding and inhibition of cAMP accumulation. Binding of the cannabinoid receptor agonist [3H]CP-55,940 was not affected by either mutation in either the CB1 or CB2 receptor, nor were the affinities of anandamide or (-)-Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Binding of the CB1-selective receptor antagonist SR141716A also was unaltered. However, the affinity of WIN 55,212-2 was attenuated significantly in the CB1, but not the CB2, mutant receptors. Studies examining inhibition of cAMP accumulation showed reduced effects of cannabinoid agonists in the mutated receptors. Our data suggest that this aspartate residue is not generally important for ligand recognition in the cannabinoid receptors; however, it is required for communication with G proteins and signal transduction.


0022-3565/98/2852-0651$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. R. Ross, I. Napier, and M. Connor
Inhibition of Recombinant Human T-type Calcium Channels by {Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol
J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2008; 283(23): 16124 - 16134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Canals and G. Milligan
Constitutive Activity of the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Regulates the Function of Co-expressed Mu Opioid Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11424 - 11434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Kapur, P. Samaniego, G. A. Thakur, A. Makriyannis, and M. E. Abood
Mapping the Structural Requirements in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Transmembrane Helix II for Signal Transduction
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Anavi-Goffer, D. Fleischer, D. P. Hurst, D. L. Lynch, J. Barnett-Norris, S. Shi, D. L. Lewis, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. C. Howlett, P. H. Reggio, et al.
Helix 8 Leu in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Contributes to Selective Signal Transduction Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 25100 - 25113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. P. Picone, A. D. Khanolkar, W. Xu, L. A. Ayotte, G. A. Thakur, D. P. Hurst, M. E. Abood, P. H. Reggio, D. J. Fournier, and A. Makriyannis
(-)-7'-Isothiocyanato-11-hydroxy-1',1'-dimethylheptylhexahydrocannabinol (AM841), a High-Affinity Electrophilic Ligand, Interacts Covalently with a Cysteine in Helix Six and Activates the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1623 - 1635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Li, N. M. Nowak, S.-K. Kim, K. A. Jacobson, A. Bagheri, C. Schmidt, and J. Wess
Random Mutagenesis of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Expressed in Yeast: IDENTIFICATION OF SECOND-SITE MUTATIONS THAT RESTORE FUNCTION TO A COUPLING-DEFICIENT MUTANT M3 RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5664 - 5675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. C. Howlett, F. Barth, T. I. Bonner, G. Cabral, P. Casellas, W. A. Devane, C. C. Felder, M. Herkenham, K. Mackie, B. R. Martin, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 161 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Nie and D. L. Lewis
Structural Domains of the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor That Contribute to Constitutive Activity and G-Protein Sequestration
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 8758 - 8764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Soderstrom and F. Johnson
Zebra Finch CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor: Pharmacology and in Vivo and in Vitro Effects of Activation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2001; 297(1): 189 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
T. W. Klein, B. Lane, C. A. Newton, and H. Friedman
The Cannabinoid System and Cytokine Network
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2000; 225(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. Griffin, Q. Tao, and M. E. Abood
Cloning and Pharmacological Characterization of the Rat CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2000; 292(3): 886 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. D. McAllister, G. Griffin, L. S. Satin, and M. E. Abood
Cannabinoid Receptors Can Activate and Inhibit G Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels in a Xenopus Oocyte Expression System
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 1999; 291(2): 618 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. P. Roche, S. Bounds, S. Brown, and K. Mackie
A Mutation in the Second Transmembrane Region of the CB1 Receptor Selectively Disrupts G Protein Signaling and Prevents Receptor Internalization
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 1999; 56(3): 611 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Q. Tao, S. D. McAllister, J. Andreassi, K. W. Nowell, G. A. Cabral, D. P. Hurst, K. Bachtel, M. C. Ekman, P. H. Reggio, and M. E. Abood
Role of a Conserved Lysine Residue in the Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor (CB2): Evidence for Subtype Specificity
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 1999; 55(3): 605 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. De Petrocellis, T. Bisogno, M. Maccarrone, J. B. Davis, A. Finazzi-Agro, and V. Di Marzo
The Activity of Anandamide at Vanilloid VR1 Receptors Requires Facilitated Transport across the Cell Membrane and Is Limited by Intracellular Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 12856 - 12863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.