JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Damaj, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Damaj, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, B. R.

Vol. 282, Issue 1, 410-419, 1997

Pharmacology of Lobeline, A Nicotinic Receptor Ligand1

M. I. Damaj, G. S. Patrick, K. R. Creasy and B. R. Martin

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia

In this study we investigated the pharmacology of lobeline, a high affinity nicotinic ligand with a unique pharmacological profile, in different in vitro and in vivo tests. Although lobeline displaced [3H]-nicotine binding sites in the rat brain with a Ki of 4.4 nM, it did not activate alpha 4beta 2 expressed receptors in frog oocytes. The in vivo pharmacological effects of lobeline were highly complex. Lobeline, at the time of maximal effect, dose-dependently produced motor impairment and decreased locomotor activity and body temperature in mice after s.c. treatment. However, antinociception was present after intrathecal but not after s.c. administration of lobeline in the tail-flick tests. The behavioral effects of lobeline were not blocked by pretreatment with either mecamylamine or dihydro-beta -erythroidine. In addition, lobeline given s.c. enhanced nicotine-induced antinociception in a dose-related manner. No acute tolerance developed to either lobeline's behavioral or antinociceptive effect after s.c. or intrathecal administration, respectively. However, tolerance developed to lobeline's pharmacological effects after chronic treatment with the drug for 10 days (15 mg/kg, s.c. twice a day). Furthermore, cross-tolerance between lobeline and nicotine developed after chronic treatment with either drug. Although the alpha 4beta 2 receptor is unlikely to mediate the agonist effects of lobeline, our results indicate that lobeline does interact with the nicotinic receptor in a novel fashion.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.