JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whittemore, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whittemore, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, R. M.

Vol. 282, Issue 1, 326-338, 1997

Antagonism of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors by sigma  Site Ligands: Potency, Subtype-Selectivity and Mechanisms of Inhibition

E. R. Whittemore, V. I. Ilyin and R. M. Woodward

CoCensys Pharmaceuticals Inc., California

Recent studies propose that sigma  site ligands antagonize N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors by either direct, or indirect mechanisms of inhibition. To investigate this question further we used electrical recordings to assay actions of seventeen structurally diverse sigma  site ligands on three diheteromeric subunit combinations of cloned rat NMDA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes: NR1a coexpressed with either NR2A, 2B or 2C. The sigma  site ligands had a wide range of potency for antagonizing NMDA receptor currents. Steady-state IC50 values ranged between ~0.1 to >100 µM. In all cases inhibition was non-competitive with respect to glycine and glutamate. Five structurally related sigma  ligands [eliprodil, haloperidol, ifenprodil, 4-phenyl-1-(4-phenylbutyl)-piperidine and trifluperidol] were strongly selective for NR1a/2B receptors. The other drugs were weakly selective or nonselective inhibitors. There was no correlation between sigma  site affinity and potency of NMDA receptor antagonism for any subunit combination. Inhibition of NR1a/2B receptors by the selective antagonists was independent of voltage whereas inhibition by the weakly selective antagonists was voltage dependent. Potency of 10 sigma  ligands was cross-checked on NMDA currents in cultured rat cortical neurons. There was close correspondence between the two assay systems. Our results argue that antagonism of NMDA receptor currents by the sigma  ligands tested is due to direct effects on the receptor channel complex as opposed to indirect effects mediated by sigma  receptors. Inhibition occurs via sites in the NMDA receptor channel pore, or via allosteric modulatory sites associated with the NR2B subunit.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.