JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohte, N.
Right arrow Articles by Little, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohte, N.
Right arrow Articles by Little, W. C.

Vol. 282, Issue 1, 23-31, 1997

The Cardiac Effects of Pimobendan (But Not Amrinone) Are Preserved at Rest and During Exercise in Conscious Dogs with Pacing-Induced Heart Failure1

Nobuyuki Ohte, Che-Ping Cheng, Makoto Suzuki and William C. Little

Cardiology Section, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

We compared the effects of pimobendan (0.25 mg/kg i.v.), a Ca++ sensitizer, with some phosphodiesterase-III inhibition effects, and amrinone (1 mg/kg plus 10 µg/kg/min i.v.), a PDE-III inhibitor, on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic performance, both at rest and during exercise, in seven conscious dogs before and after pacing-induced congestive heart failure (CHF). Before CHF, under resting conditions, both pimobendan and amrinone caused a similar significant decrease in left ventricle size and end-systolic pressure, arterial elastance, and the time constant of LV relaxation. Similar results were obtained during exercise. Both agents also produced a similar increase in EES, the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relation (3.4 ± 1.5 vs. 4.2 ± 1.1 mm Hg/ml; amrinone vs. pimobendan). After CHF, the vasodilatory effects of amrinone and pimobendan were preserved both at rest and during exercise; however, the inotropic actions were different. After CHF, pimobendan increased EES (3.9 ± 0.5 vs. 5.7 ± 0.4 mm Hg/ml, P < .05), decreased the time constant of LV relaxation, increased the maximum rate of LV filling (37 ± 19 ml/sec) (P < .05) and produced a downward shift of the early diastolic portion of LV pressure-volume loop. Pimobendan also augmented LV contractile performance during CHF exercise. In contrast, after CHF, amrinone no longer produced a positive inotropic effect. Amrinone improved LV relaxation and filling, both at rest and during exercise after CHF, but significantly less than pimobendan. We conclude that after CHF, the cardiac response to a PDE-III inhibitor is attenuated, but the response to Ca++ sensitizer is preserved. Thus, after CHF, pimobendan is more effective than amrinone in enhancing LV contractile state, LV relaxation and LV filling both at rest and during exercise.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.