![]() |
|
|
Vol. 282, Issue 1, 132-147, 1997
2A-Adrenergic Receptors in Relation to Modulation of
Cortical Monoamine Release and Activity in Models of Potential
Antidepressant Activity
Institut de Recherches Servier, The novel, potential anxiolytic, S 15535 (4-(benzodioxan-5-yl)1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine), is an agonist and
antagonist (weak partial agonist) at pre- and postsynaptic serotonin
(5-HT)1A receptors, respectively. Herein, we characterized
its influence on dialysate levels of 5-HT, dopamine (DA) and NAD
simultaneously determined in single samples of the
frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, and compared its activity
in several other models of potential antidepressant (AD) properties
with those of the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine. S 15535 displayed high affinity at cloned human (h) 5-HT1A
receptors (Ki = 0.7 nM) and >250-fold lower
affinity at cloned hD2 (400 nM), hD3 (248 nM)
and h
2A-adrenergic (AR) (190 nM) receptors. S 15535 (0.08-5.0 mg/kg s.c.) markedly and dose-dependently suppressed
dialysate levels of 5-HT in the FCX, nucleus accumbens and striatum of
freely moving rats, whereas fluoxetine (10.0 mg/kg s.c.) elevated
levels of 5-HT in each structure. In contrast to 5-HT, dialysate levels
of DA and NAD in the FCX were dose-dependently increased by S 15535, and this effect was mimicked by fluoxetine. The influence of S 15535 and fluoxetine on FCX levels of DA was regionally specific inasmuch as
dialysate levels of DA in the accumbens and striatum were not modified. The selective 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY 100,635 (N-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl}-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (0.16) transiently elicited a slight increase in
cortical levels of 5-HT, an action opposite to that of S
15535. Further, in the presence of WAY 100,635 (0.16), the influence of
S 15535 (0.63) on cortical levels of 5-HT, DA and NAD was markedly attenuated. Upon chronic administration of S 15535 or fluoxetine (10.0 mg/kg s.c. daily for 14 days, in each case), there was no significant
alteration in the density of
-AR receptors in the FCX. However, in
contrast to fluoxetine, S 15535 elicited a significant (25%) decrease
in the density (Bmax) of 5-HT2A
receptors labeled by [3H]ketanserin in the cortex; there
was no alteration in Kd. In a learned
helplessness paradigm in rats, S 15535 (0.63-40.0 mg/kg p.o.) markedly
reduced escape deficits on each of three consecutive days of testing.
Fluoxetine (2.0-8.0 mg/kg i.p.) was also active in each session, but
presented a biphasic dose-response curve. Finally, under the conditions
used, neither S 15535 (0.63-10.0) nor fluoxetine (0.63-10.0)
decreased immobility time in the forced swim test. In conclusion, S
15535 is a selective ligand of cloned, h5-HT1A receptors.
Its agonist actions at 5-HT1A autoreceptors underlie its
ability to decrease extracellular levels of 5-HT in the FCX, and likely
contribute to the increase in extracellular levels of DA and NAD evoked
by S 15535 in this structure. Further, S 15535 is active in several
other, although not all, models of potential AD activity. Thus,
although S 15535 is under development as an anxiolytic agent, a further
characterization of its putative AD actions would be of interest.
Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics