JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Testa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Leonardi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Testa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Leonardi, A.

Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1284-1293, 1997

Pharmacological Characterization of the Uroselective Alpha-1 Antagonist Rec 15/2739 (SB 216469): Role of the Alpha-1L Adrenoceptor in Tissue Selectivity, Part II

R. Testa, L. Guarneri, P. Angelico, E. Poggesi, C. Taddei, G. Sironi, D. Colombo, A. C. Sulpizio, D. P. Naselsky, J. P. Hieble and A. Leonardi

Pharmaceutical R&D Division, Recordati S.p.A., 20148 Milano, Italy (R.T., L.G., P.A., E.P., C.T., G.S., D.C., A.L.) and Department of Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (A.C.S., D.P.N., J.P.H.)

The aim of the present work was to investigate whether or not the uroselectivity of Rec 15/2739 and several other alpha-1 adrenoceptor (alpha 1-AR) antagonists observed in the anesthetized dog could be related to selectivity of these compounds for a particular alpha-1 AR subtype. The binding affinity of the tested compounds for canine prostate alpha-1 ARs and their in vitro functional affinity for the alpha-1 ARs of rabbit urethra and prostate correlated with their functional affinity for the alpha-1L AR subtype, but not with the binding affinity for recombinant animal and human alpha-1a, alpha-1b and alpha-1d AR subtypes. Similar results were obtained when the in vivo potency on urethral pressure was correlated with the affinity for the alpha-1 AR subtypes; also in this case alpha-1L AR gave the best correlation. No correlation was obtained by considering the other alpha-1 AR subtypes. The in vivo hypotensive effects observed in dog after i.v. administration of the considered compounds correlated only with the binding affinity for the animal and human alpha-1d subtype. In conclusion, the results shown in the present paper indicate that the potencies of different alpha-1 antagonists against the contractions induced by norepinephrine on tissues of the lower urinary tract of rabbits and dogs are better correlated with their affinity for the putative alpha-1L subtype than for the alpha-1a subtype. Only the compounds showing selectivity for the alpha-1L subtype versus the alpha-1d subtype proved highly selective in vivo for the lower urinary tract versus the vascular tissues.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.