JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eichelbaum, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gross, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eichelbaum, M.

Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1102-1112, 1997

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Enantiomers of Gallopamil1

A. S. Gross2 , G. Mikus, D. Ratge, H. Wisser and M. Eichelbaum

Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie (A.S.G., G.M., M.E.), Stuttgart, Germany, and Department of Clinical Chemistry (D.R., H.W.), Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the enantiomers of the calcium antagonist gallopamil have been investigated in six healthy volunteers. Each subject was studied on five occasions after receiving, in randomized order: placebo, 25 mg of (R)-gallopamil, 25 mg of (S)-gallopamil, 50 mg of pseudoracemic [25 mg of deuterated (S)- gallopamil and 25 mg of (R)-gallopamil] and 100 mg of (R)-gallopamil HCl orally. After separate administration, the apparent oral clearances of both enantiomers were similar [(R), 15.1 ± 9.9 liters/min; (S), 11.0 ± 6.0 liters/min], indicating that gallopamil first-pass metabolism is not stereoselective. After coadministration, the apparent oral clearance of each enantiomers decreased [(R), 5.9 ± 2.8 liters/min; (S), 5.8 ± 2.66 liters/min], suggesting that a partial saturation of first-pass metabolism occurs because the dose was twice as high than for the single enantiomers. Serum protein binding and renal elimination of gallopamil are stereoselective, favoring (S)-gallopamil. Analysis of urine samples revealed a marked degree of stereoselectivity in the formation of O- and N-dealkyl metabolites. Because these showed opposite stereoselectivity, canceling out each other, the net result was no or only marginal stereoselectivity. Twenty-five milligrams of (S)-gallopamil prolonged the PR interval in all subjects; however, a greater effect was elicited by 50 mg of (RS)-gallopamil. (R)-Gallopamil (100 mg) did not significantly alter the PR interval, although higher concentrations were attained than after the pseudoracemate. Based on a consideration of (S)-gallopamil serum concentrations, a comparable relationship between (S)-gallopamil level and effect occurred after (S)- and (RS)-gallopamil, indicating that the pharmacological effect produced by the racemate could be totally accounted for by the higher concentrations of (S)-gallopamil attained.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.