JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu-Wong, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opgenorth, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu-Wong, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opgenorth, T. J.

Vol. 281, Issue 2, 791-798, 1997

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Effect of Serum Albumin on Potency and Comparison of Pharmacological Characteristics

Jinshyun R. Wu-Wong, Douglas B. Dixon, William J. Chiou and Terry J. Opgenorth

Pharmaceutical Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois

Endothelins (ETs) are 21-amino acid peptides that bind to membrane receptors to initiate pathophysiological effects. Two types of ET receptors, ETA and ETB, have been identified. Various ET receptor antagonists are being developed as therapeutic agents. This report examines the effects of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on the potency of ET receptor antagonists and compares five ET receptor antagonists. Competition studies show that in the absence of BSA, A-127722 and L-749329 inhibited ET-1 binding to ETA receptor with the same IC50 value of 0.09 nM. Addition of increasing concentrations of BSA incrementally decreased the potency of the antagonists: in the presence of 5% BSA, the IC50 values increased to 4.3 and 820 nM, respectively. Similarly, addition of BSA decreased the potency of antagonists in inhibiting ET-1-stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis. These results suggest that serum albumin has profound effects on the potencies of ET receptor antagonists. FR139317, PD-156707, L-749329, Ro-47-0203 and A-127722 were then selected for direct comparison under identical experimental conditions with 0.2% BSA. The potency of antagonists was assessed by binding studies for the determination of IC50 and Ki values and by ET-1-stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and arachidonic acid release for the determination of IC50 and pA2 values. All five antagonists inhibited ET binding and the biological effects exerted by ET in a competitive mode. The Ki values for A-127722, PD-156707, FR139317, Ro-47-0203 and L-749329 for the ETA receptor were 0.07, 0.38, 0.80, 3.67 and 33.6 nM, respectively. A similar hierarchy was revealed by the functional assays. Our results suggest that the rank order of potency of the antagonists is A-127722 >=  PD-156707 >=  FR139317 > Ro-47-0203 > L-749329.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.